1
|
Wu T, Wu Y, Chen S, Wu J, Zhu W, Liu H, Chen M, Xu B. Curative Effect and Survival Assessment Comparing Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:678896. [PMID: 34900663 PMCID: PMC8656312 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.678896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been accepted as an effective curative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients and has resulted in better survival outcomes than radical cystectomy or a cisplatin-based regimen. In the present study, we aimed to compare the two most commonly used cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapies, gemcitabine plus cisplatin and methotrexate plus vinblastine plus doxorubicin plus cisplatin, by summarizing and analyzing clinical data and outcomes of published research. METHODS We searched for qualified studies that compared these two types of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including 4 randomized controlled trials and 14 retrospective studies. Data and information on pathological responses and long-term survival studies were extracted and analyzed separately. RESULTS A total of 18 studies with 3116 patients were selected from 1188 studies, which contained data on pathological complete response, pathological partial response, and overall survival. In contrast to the results of previous studies, there was no significant difference in pathological complete response (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.15), pathological partial response (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.14), and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.17) between GC and MVAC in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSION No significant differences were observed between GC and MVAC in the muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment due to the similar curative effect and parallel long survival outcomes due to the similar curative effect and parallel long survival outcomes. The priority selection of GC or MVAC in the clinic should be guided by further investigation, and the clinical standard strategy still counts on the results of more randomized controlled trials in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiange Wu
- Surgical Research Center, Institute of Urology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yuqing Wu
- Surgical Research Center, Institute of Urology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shuqiu Chen
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianping Wu
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Weidong Zhu
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Urology, Binhai County People’s Hospital, Yancheng, China
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University Lishui Branch, Nanjing, China
| | - Bin Xu
- Surgical Research Center, Institute of Urology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
A prospective study to examine the accuracies and efficacies of prediction systems for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Oncol Lett 2018; 16:5775-5784. [PMID: 30333861 PMCID: PMC6176418 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study established systems to predict the chemo-sensitivity of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin plus cisplatin (M-VAC) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine (CaG) by analyzing microarray data. The primary aim of the study was to investigate whether the clinical response would increase by combining these prediction systems. Treatment of each MIBC case was allocated into M-VAC NAC, CaG NAC, surgery, or radiation therapy groups by their prediction score (PS), which was calculated using the designed chemo-sensitivity prediction system. The therapeutic effect of the present study was compared with the results of historical controls (n=76 patients) whose treatments were not allocated using the chemo-sensitivity prediction system. In addition, the overall survival between the predicted to be responder (positive PS) group and predicted to be non-responder (negative PS) group was investigated in the present study. Of the 33 patients with MIBC, 25 cases were positive PS and 8 were negative PS. Among the 25 positive PS cases, 7 were allocated to receive M-VAC NAC and 18 were allocated to receive CaG NAC according to the results of the prediction systems. Of the 8 negative PS cases, 3 received CaG NAC, 1 received surgery without NAC and 4 received radiation therapy. The total clinical response to NAC was 88.0% (22/25), which was significantly increased compared with the historical controls [56.6% (43/76) P=0.0041]. Overall survival of the positive PS group in the study was significantly increased compared with the negative PS group (P=0.027). In conclusion, the combination of the two prediction systems may increase the treatment efficacy for patients with MIBC by proposing the optimal NAC regimen. In addition, the positive PS group would have a better prognosis compared with the negative PS group. These results suggest that the two prediction systems may lead to the achievement of ‘precision medicine’.
Collapse
|
3
|
Leone AR, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Diorio GJ, Sharma P, Boulware D, Gilbert SM, Powsang JM, Zhang J, Sexton WJ, Spiess PE, Poch MA. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bladder Cancer: Oncologic Outcomes From a Single Institution Experience. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15:e583-e589. [PMID: 28410909 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Revised: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We conducted this study to determine if, in appropriately selected elderly patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), clinical outcomes including pathologic complete response/downstaging and overall survival were similar to a younger cohort. METHODS Chart review was performed on patients receiving NAC for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) from 2004 to 2013. A total of 116 patients were identified that underwent NAC from 2004 to 2013 for ≥ cT2N0M0 UCB. Patients were excluded who received 2 cycles or less of chemotherapy (N = 18; 11 patients in the younger cohort, 7 in the elderly group; P = .74). Data was analyzed, and Kaplan-Meir analysis curves were used for survival and recurrence. RESULTS Forty-six elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) (67% cisplatin-based regimen) were identified and compared with 70 (93% cisplatin-based regimen) younger patients. The estimated glomerular filtration rate, performance status, preoperative hemoglobin, and body mass index were significantly worse in elderly patients. Dose reduction and pathologic downstaging to non-muscle-invasive disease was not statistically different between older and younger patients Complete pathologic response in older patients (16%) and in the younger cohort (17%) were similar (P = .146). There was no significant difference in follow-up, recurrence, or in median overall survival between patient groups (28 months elderly vs. 35 months younger; P = .78). Age was not an independent predictor of pathologic downstaging, complete response, overall survival, or recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS NAC in elderly patients (≥ 70 years old) demonstrated equivalent toxicity and oncologic outcomes in our single-institution cohort. Although older patients had significantly poorer performance status and renal function, there were no differences in survival or response to NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Leone
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
| | - Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Gregory J Diorio
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Pranav Sharma
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - David Boulware
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Scott M Gilbert
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Julio M Powsang
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Jingsong Zhang
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Wade J Sexton
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Michael A Poch
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yin M, Joshi M, Meijer RP, Glantz M, Holder S, Harvey HA, Kaag M, Fransen van de Putte EE, Horenblas S, Drabick JJ. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Two-Step Meta-Analysis. Oncologist 2016; 21:708-15. [PMID: 27053504 PMCID: PMC4912364 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 325] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2015] [Accepted: 01/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide updated results of previous findings. We also summarized published data to compare clinical outcomes of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin/carboplatin (GC) in the neoadjuvant setting. METHODS A meta-analysis of 15 randomized clinical trials was performed to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus local treatment with the same local treatment alone. Because no randomized trials have investigated MVAC versus GC in the neoadjuvant setting, a meta-analysis of 13 retrospective studies was performed to compare MVAC with GC. RESULTS A total of 3,285 patients were included in 15 randomized clinical trials. There was a significant overall survival (OS) benefit associated with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.96). A total of 1,766 patients were included in 13 retrospective studies. There was no significant difference in pathological complete response between MVAC and GC. However, GC was associated with a significantly reduced overall survival (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.57). After excluding carboplatin data, GC still seemed to be inferior to MVAC in OS (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.99-1.74), but the difference was no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSION These results support the use of cisplatin-based combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Although GC and MVAC had similar treatment response rates, the different survival outcome observed in this study requires further investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has been shown to improve survival outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients, but the optimal neoadjuvant regimen has not been established. Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) and gemcitabine and cisplatin/carboplatin (GC) are two of the most commonly used chemotherapy regimens in modern oncology. In this two-step meta-analysis, an updated and more precise estimate of the survival benefit of cisplatin-based NCT in MIBC is provided. This study also demonstrated that MVAC might have superior overall survival compared with GC (with or without carboplatin data) in the neoadjuvant setting. The findings suggest that NCT should be standard care in MIBC, and MVAC could be the preferred neoadjuvant regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Yin
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Monika Joshi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Glantz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sheldon Holder
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Harold A Harvey
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew Kaag
- Department of Urology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph J Drabick
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rudzinski JK, Basappa NS, North S. Perioperative chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2015; 9:249-54. [PMID: 26125306 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Radical cystectomy with or without systemic chemotherapy is considered a standard of care for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The purpose of this review is to provide an update on current and recent literature published within the last 12 months reviewing the evidence for use of perioperative chemotherapy for patients with MIBC. RECENT FINDINGS In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) setting, the evidence demonstrates clinical efficacy and lower rate of toxicity with the use of high-dose methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (MVAC) compared with standard MVAC. Higher quality evidence for the use of gemcitabine with cisplatin is not yet available. Meta-analysis of cisplatin-based regimens in the adjuvant setting demonstrates significant benefit in overall survival and disease-free survival specifically in patients with lymph-node-positive disease. SUMMARY The available evidence suggests that along with radical cystectomy, cisplatin-based perioperative chemotherapy should be the standard of care in patients with MIBC with a higher quality and quantity of literature in support of the NAC approach. Adoption of perioperative chemotherapy for MIBC is on the rise in North America, which is reassuring. Novel therapeutic approaches for cisplatin-ineligible patients are currently being investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan K Rudzinski
- aDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery bDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mitra AP, Lerner SP. Potential Role for Targeted Therapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2015; 42:201-15, viii. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2015.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
7
|
Ryan Pritchard E, Waddell JA, Solimando DA. Gemcitabine and Carboplatin (renally dosed) regimen for bladder cancer. Hosp Pharm 2015; 50:103-7. [PMID: 25717204 DOI: 10.1310/hpj5002-103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of antineoplastic therapy, and the agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases. Questions or suggestions for topics should be addressed to Dominic A. Solimando, Jr, President, Oncology Pharmacy Services, Inc., 4201 Wilson Blvd #110-545, Arlington, VA 22203, e-mail: OncRxSvc@comcast.net; or J. Aubrey Waddell, Professor, University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy; Oncology Pharmacist, Pharmacy Department, Blount Memorial Hospital, 907 E. Lamar Alexander Parkway, Maryville, TN 37804, e-mail: waddfour@charter.net.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Ryan Pritchard
- Dr. Pritchard is a pharmacy practice (PGY1) resident at Blount Memorial Hospital , Maryville, Tennessee
| | - J Aubrey Waddell
- Dr. Pritchard is a pharmacy practice (PGY1) resident at Blount Memorial Hospital , Maryville, Tennessee
| | - Dominic A Solimando
- Dr. Pritchard is a pharmacy practice (PGY1) resident at Blount Memorial Hospital , Maryville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zargar H, Espiritu PN, Fairey AS, Mertens LS, Dinney CP, Mir MC, Krabbe LM, Cookson MS, Jacobsen NE, Gandhi NM, Griffin J, Montgomery JS, Vasdev N, Yu EY, Youssef D, Xylinas E, Campain NJ, Kassouf W, Dall'Era MA, Seah JA, Ercole CE, Horenblas S, Sridhar SS, McGrath JS, Aning J, Shariat SF, Wright JL, Thorpe AC, Morgan TM, Holzbeierlein JM, Bivalacqua TJ, North S, Barocas DA, Lotan Y, Garcia JA, Stephenson AJ, Shah JB, van Rhijn BW, Daneshmand S, Spiess PE, Black PC. Multicenter assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2014; 67:241-9. [PMID: 25257030 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 204] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2014] [Accepted: 09/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) was established primarily with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), with complete response rates (pT0) as high as 38%. However, because of the comparable efficacy with better tolerability of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with metastatic disease, GC has become the most commonly used regimen in the neoadjuvant setting. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess real-world pathologic response rates to NAC with different regimens in a large, multicenter cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Data were collected retrospectively at 19 centers on patients with clinical cT2-4aN0M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who received at least three cycles of NAC, followed by radical cystectomy (RC), between 2000 and 2013. INTERVENTION NAC and RC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary outcome was pathologic stage at cystectomy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine factors predictive of pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 stages. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Data were collected on 935 patients who met inclusion criteria. GC was used in the majority of the patients (n=602; 64.4%), followed by MVAC (n=183; 19.6%) and other regimens (n=144; 15.4%). The rates of pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 pathologic response were 22.7% and 40.8%, respectively. The rate of pT0N0 disease for patients receiving GC was 23.9%, compared with 24.5% for MVAC (p=0.2). There was no difference between MVAC and GC in pT0N0 on multivariable analysis (odds ratio: 0.89 [95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.34]; p=0.6). CONCLUSIONS Response rates to NAC were lower than those reported in prospective randomized trials, and we did not discern a difference between MVAC and GC. Without any evidence from randomized prospective trials, the best NAC regimen for invasive BCa remains to be determined. PATIENT SUMMARY There was no apparent difference in the response rates to the two most common presurgical chemotherapy regimens for patients with bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Homayoun Zargar
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Patrick N Espiritu
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Adrian S Fairey
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Colin P Dinney
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria C Mir
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Laura-Maria Krabbe
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michael S Cookson
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Nilay M Gandhi
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joshua Griffin
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David Youssef
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas J Campain
- Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marc A Dall'Era
- Department of Urology, University of California at Davis, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Jo-An Seah
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cesar E Ercole
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - John S McGrath
- Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Jonathan Aning
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrew C Thorpe
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeff M Holzbeierlein
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Scott North
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jorge A Garcia
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrew J Stephenson
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jay B Shah
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bas W van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Peter C Black
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mise au point du FRancilian Oncogeriatric Group (FROG) pour la prise en charge du cancer de vessie du sujet âgé. Bull Cancer 2014; 101:841-55. [DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2014.1939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
10
|
Kim SH, Yang HK, Lee JH, Lee ES. A retrospective analysis of incidence and its associated risk factors of upper urinary tract recurrence following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer with transitional cell carcinoma: the significance of local pelvic recurrence and positive lymph node. PLoS One 2014; 9:e96467. [PMID: 24798444 PMCID: PMC4010468 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2013] [Accepted: 04/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to examine the incidence and risk factors of upper urinary tract recurrence (UUTR) following radical cystectomy (RC) in bladder cancer and to evaluate its relationship with neobladder (Neo) or ileal conduit (IC). Materials and Methods All clinicopathologic parameters and perioperative parameters of 311 patients who underwent RC with either Neo or IC by a single surgeon from 1999 to 2012 were retrospectively included in this study. Patients with a history of renal surgery, concomitant UUTR, or a histopathology of non-transitional cell carcinoma were excluded. For statistical analyses of predictive risk factors of UUTR, a multivariate analysis was performed with known risk factors of UUTR, including type of urinary diversion with significance defined as P < 0.05. Results During the median follow-up period of 53 months, 143 (46.0%) IC and 168 (54.0%) Neo were performed, resulting in 11 (3.5%) cases of UUTR (Neo 7 and IC 4) after RC and all patients then underwent nephroureterectomy. No significant differences in incidence and overall survival in UUTR were observed according different types of urinary diversion (p = 483), and the prognosis for survival of Neo was insignificantly better than that of IC (5-year overall survival 78% vs 74%, respectively, p>0.05). Higher number of positive lymph nodes (HR 9.03) and the presence of pelvic local recurrence (HR 7286.08) were significant predictive factors of UUTR (p<0.05). Conclusion This study reports a UUTR rate of 3.5%, and positive lymph nodes and presence of local recurrence at the pelvis as important risk factors. No significant differences in incidence and survival were observed between Neo and IC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Han Kim
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyanggi, Korea
| | - Hyung-Kook Yang
- Department of Epidemiology and Statistics and Cancer Policy Branch of the National Cancer Control Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyanggi, Korea
| | - Jung Hoon Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun-Sik Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
North S, El-Gehani F, Santos C, Ghosh S, Lai R, Cass CE, Mackey JR. Expression of nucleoside transporters and deoxycytidine kinase proteins in muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: correlation with pathological response to neoadjuvant platinum/gemcitabine combination chemotherapy. J Urol 2013; 191:35-9. [PMID: 23851183 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In pancreatic cancer, deoxycytidine kinase and the human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 have been validated as predictive markers for benefit from gemcitabine therapy. Gemcitabine is used with cisplatin or carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive urothelial cancer of the bladder before radical cystectomy and patients rendered disease-free at surgery tend to have better outcomes. In this trial we examined if nucleoside transporter or deoxycytidine kinase protein abundance in biopsy specimens before chemotherapy is related to the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 62 consecutive patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with platinum/gemcitabine at a single institution were accrued. Initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor specimens and cystectomy specimens were collected, and scored for nucleoside transporter and deoxycytidine kinase expression. Pathological response rates and survival data were collected. RESULTS Of the 62 patients 17 (27%) achieved a complete pathological response (pT0) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nucleoside transporter and deoxycytidine kinase protein expression in the transurethral resection of bladder tumor specimens did not predict for pT0 status to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median overall survival was not reached for the group achieving pT0 status and was 46 months for those with persistent cancer at definitive surgery (p = 0.07). Median followup for the cohort was 30 months. CONCLUSIONS Nucleoside transporter and deoxycytidine kinase expression in transurethral resection of bladder tumor samples do not predict for response to gemcitabine and platinum neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients should continue to be offered neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy based on clinical and pathological staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott North
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - Faraj El-Gehani
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Cheryl Santos
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Raymond Lai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Carol E Cass
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - John R Mackey
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|