Randomized phase III trial of post-operative chemotherapy for patients with stage I/II/III small bowel adenocarcinoma (JCOG1502C, J-BALLAD)

Incidence, clinical management and prognosis of patients with small intestinal adenocarcinomas from 1999 through 2019: A nationwide Dutch cohort study

BACKGROUND

Small intestinal adenocarcinomas (SIAs) are rare. Hence, randomized controlled trials are lacking and understanding of the disease features is limited. This nationwide cohort investigates incidence, treatment and prognosis of SIA patients, to improve disease outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of 2697 SIA patients diagnosed from January 1999 through December 2019 were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and Pathology Archive. Incidence was calculated using the revised European Standardized Rate. The influence of patient and tumor characteristics on overall survival (OS) was studied using survival analyses.

RESULTS

The age-standardized incidence rate almost doubled from 0.58 to 1.06 per 100,000 person-years, exclusively caused by an increase in duodenal adenocarcinomas. OS did not improve over time. Independent factors for a better OS were a younger age, jejunal tumors, Lynch syndrome and systemic therapy. Only 13.8% of resected patients was treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, which improved OS compared to surgery alone in stage III disease (HR 0.47 (0.35-0.61)), but not in the limited group of deficient mismatch repair (MMR) patients (n = 53, HR 0.93 (0.25-3.47)). In the first-line setting, CAPOX was associated with improved OS compared to FOLFOX (HR 0.51 (0.36-0.72)). For oligometastatic patients, a metastasectomy significantly improved OS (HR 0.54 (0.36-0.80)).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of SIAs almost doubled in the past 20 years, with no improvement in OS. This retrospective non-randomized study suggests the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III disease and first-line CAPOX for metastatic patients. For selected oligometastatic patients, a metastasectomy may be considered. MMR-status testing could aid in clinical decision-making.

Small bowel adenocarcinomas with favorable prognoses by radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy: a case series of five cases

BACKGROUND

Small bowel cancer is very rare, accounting for less than 5% of all gastrointestinal cancers, and small bowel adenocarcinoma accounts for approximately 40% of all small bowel cancers. Small bowel adenocarcinoma is often found in advanced stages, with only 40-65% of cases being curatively resectable. The prognosis is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 14-33% for all patients and 40-60% for those who are curatively resectable. In Japan, practice guidelines for duodenal cancer were instituted in 2021. However, evidence-based standard treatments have not been established for jejunal and ileal cancers. In particular, chemotherapeutic options are limited, and there are only a few reports on multidisciplinary treatments, including adjuvant chemotherapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report five cases of jejunal or ileal lesions that were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection. Three patients were male and two were female, with a median age of 67 years. Tumor localization was observed in the jejunum in all cases. Clinical staging was as follows: stage IIIA in two cases and stage IIIB in three cases. Laparotomy was then performed in all cases, employing partial resection with lymph node dissection. Pathological staging in all cases was as follows: stage IIB in two cases, stage IIIA in one case, and stage IIIB in two cases. In all cases, the regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy was selected based on the colorectal cancer guidelines. No serious complications arose from adjuvant therapy; however, adverse events occurred in patients receiving multi-agent chemotherapy. No recurrence was observed in any of the cases, and all the patients survived, with a median survival time of 32 months. As a representative case, we present a case of adjuvant chemotherapy for jejunal adenocarcinoma staged as pT3N2M0, pStage IIIB, with no recurrence at 32 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, favorable outcomes were achieved with adjuvant therapy applied in accordance with the criteria for colorectal cancer. These favorable outcomes suggest that it is necessary to identify the risk factors and indications for adjuvant therapy, specifically for small bowel adenocarcinoma.

Small intestinal adenocarcinoma accompanied by lynch syndrome: A case report

RATIONALE

Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations of DNA mismatch repair genes. A significant risk increase for several types of cancer is one of the characteristics of lynch syndrome.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 45-year-old female presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain that had persisted for a month.

DIAGNOSES

The abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scan showed edematous and thickening of the proximal small bowel wall, as well as dilatation of the proximal bowel and stomach.

INTERVENTIONS

Tumor resection of the small bowel was performed, and adenocarcinoma was confirmed pathologically. Microsatellite instability was also confirmed.

OUTCOMES

Postoperative imaging revealed soft tissue lesions with potential for tumor seeding. Two months after the first surgery, a secondary surgery was performed as a result of cancer recurrence. The patient received chemotherapy with capecitabine. The latest computed tomography scan, performed 19 months after the cessation of chemotherapy, did not show any recurrence.

LESSONS

In the rare incidence of small bowel cancer genetic mutation testing and detailed family history should be actively considered.

Updates in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors

Small-bowel tumors represent a rare entity comprising 0.6% of all new cancer cases in the US, and only 3% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. They are a heterogenous group of neoplasms comprising of about forty different histological subtypes with the most common being adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, stromal tumors and lymphomas. Their incidence has been reportedly increasing over recent years, partly owing to the advances and developments in the diagnostic modalities. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy, device assisted enteroscopy and dedicated small-bowel cross-sectional imaging are complimentary tools, supplementing each other in the diagnostic process. Therapeutic management of small-bowel tumors largely depends on the histological type and staging at diagnosis. The aim of the present review article is to discuss relevant advances in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors.

Evaluation of Systemic Treatments of Small Intestinal Adenocarcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Although small intestinal adenocarcinomas (SIAs) are rare, they have a poor prognosis, and the optimal treatment strategies are largely unknown. Because of the lack of high-quality evidence, guidelines for colorectal cancer are often followed in the treatment of SIAs.

OBJECTIVE

To review the current evidence regarding survival benefit of systemic therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy, for patients with SIAs.

DATA SOURCES

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, MEDLINE and Embase were searched for articles published from January 1, 2005, until June 1, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Retrospective cohort studies and prospective phase 2 or 3 trials describing survival after systemic therapies for patients with SIAs were eligible for inclusion. Assessment of study eligibility was blinded and performed by 3 reviewers.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The reviewers independently extracted data. Random effects, inverse variance, pairwise meta-analyses were performed.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with SIAs after systemic therapies. Measures of interest included hazard ratios for survival and median survival times.

RESULTS

Overall, 57 retrospective cohort and phase 2 studies of 35 176 patients were included. Adjuvant chemotherapy, generally fluoropyrimidine-based, was associated with increased OS in stage I to III SIAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.53-0.68), especially in stage III tumors (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.64), irrespective of tumor localization. Palliative chemotherapy was also associated with an OS benefit (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.58). Fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin combinations were superior to other regimens (OS: HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.99; PFS: HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.71). Furthermore, bevacizumab added to chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone was associated with significantly prolonged PFS (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.89). Immunotherapy showed a 50% overall response rate in previously treated defective mismatch repair tumors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy were both associated with improved survival of patients with SIAs, especially fluoropyrimidine-based regimens and fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin combinations. Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy appears to prolong PFS and deserves further investigation. Immunotherapy seems beneficial and should be considered for patients with defective mismatch repair tumors. International collaborations should be undertaken to confirm and improve efficacy of systemic therapies for patients with SIAs.

Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: 10-Year Experience in a Cancer Center-The Ottawa Hospital (TOH)

(1) Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is one of the predominant primary small bowel cancers that has a dismal outcome. We aim to report 10 years of experience in SBA management at a regional cancer centre in Canada.; (2) Methods: We retrospectively analysed clinical and pathological data of patients diagnosed with an SBA between 2011 and 2021 at the Ottawa Hospital (TOH), Ottawa, Canada. We describe the clinicopathological features and outcomes, including survival. Potential prognostic factors were analysed using the Cox proportional hazard model for multivariate analysis.; (3) Results: We identified 115 patients with SBA. The duodenum was the most common SBA location representing 61% (70) of the total patients, followed by the jejunum (17%) and ileum (10%). Around 24% (27) of cases presented with bowel obstructions. The majority of patients (56%, 64) had stage IV disease on presentation. Seven patients had MSI-high tumours, while 24% (27) were MS-stable. In terms of management, 48 patients underwent curative surgical resection, 17 of whom received adjuvant chemotherapy. On the other hand, 57 patients (49.5%) with the advanced disease received palliative systemic therapy, and 18 patients (16%) had supportive care only. Over a median follow-up of 21.5 months (range 0-122), the median overall survival was 94, 61, and 34 months for stages II, III, and IV, respectively (p < 0.05). The median recurrence-free survival was 93 and 23 months for stages II and III, respectively. However, there was no statistically significant difference between TNM stages in RFS, p = 0.069. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed only poor performance status at diagnosis as a predictor for shorter overall survival (p < 0.05). The univariate analysis didn't show any significant correlation between RFS and covariants.; (4) Conclusions: SBA remains one of the most aggressive tumours with a dismal prognosis even after surgical resection. The optimal chemotherapy regimen has not been established. Further studies are needed to explore the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for stages I-III SBA.

Localized Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma Management: Evidence Summary

Small bowel cancers are rare diseases whose prognosis is poorer than that of colon cancers. Due to disease rarity, there is little data on small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) treatment, and most recommendations come from expert agreements or analogies to the management of colon cancer. Although relatively high rates of local recurrence are observed for duodenal malignancies, distant metastatic relapse remains common and requires adjuvant systemic therapy. Given the similarities between SBA and colorectal cancer, radiotherapy and chemotherapy strategies used for the latter disease are frequently pursued for the former disease, specifically for tumors located in the duodenum. However, no previous randomized study has evaluated the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy on the overall survival of SBA patients. Most previous studies on treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in this context were based on large international databases, such as the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results or the National Cancer Database. Studies are required to establish and validate prognostic and predictive markers relevant in this context to inform the use of (neo) adjuvant treatment. Among those, deficient mismatch repair tumors represent 20% of SBAs, but their impact on chemosensitivity remains unknown. Herein, we summarize the current evidence on the management of localized SBA, including future perspectives.

Surgical results of non-ampullary duodenal cancer: a nationwide survey in Japan

BACKGROUND

As non-ampullary duodenal cancer is relatively rare, the optimal treatment strategy, including the appropriate surgical procedure and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy, remains unclear. This nationwide survey aimed to clarify the actual lymph node spread pattern and determine the optimal treatment strategy for this disease, using a large-scale database.

METHODS

We used a questionnaire and a retrospective registry of 1083 patients with non-ampullary duodenal cancer who had undergone surgery during 2008-2017 in 114 high-volume Japanese Society of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery-certified training institutions. Propensity score-matched analyses were conducted to minimise background bias. Cox regression was performed to identify covariates associated with recurrence-free survival. There were distinct disparities in the nodal dissection rate according to the predominant tumor location and tumor invasion depth. Metastases were frequently observed in the peripancreatic nodes and those along the superior mesenteric artery, irrespective of tumor location. Their dissection seemed to be beneficial for improved survival. In the overall cohort, no survival benefit was observed in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy when compared with that in patients who underwent surgery alone. Nevertheless, in the matched cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy for > 6 months was associated with a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (median: 43.5 vs. 22.5 months, p = 0.016), particularly in patients with tumor invasion of the subserosa or deeper tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, or elevated serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatoduodenectomy should be the standard procedure for advanced non-ampullary duodenal cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy for > 6 months, especially for advanced tumors, significantly improves survival.

Prognostic Factors and Lymph Node Metastasis Patterns of Primary Duodenal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and extent of regional lymph node dissection in primary duodenal cancer (DC) remains unclear. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic factors and lymph node metastasis (LNM) patterns in DC.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients who underwent surgical resection for DC between January 1998 and December 2018 at two institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the prognostic factors of resected DC. Moreover, the relationships between depth of tumor invasion and incidence of LNM and between tumor location and LNM stations were analyzed.

RESULTS

The five-year survival rate of the study population was 68.9%. Multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that histologic grade G2-G4, presence of LNM, pT3-4, and elevated preoperative CA19-9 were the independent poor prognostic factors. No patient with pTis-T2 had LNM. On the other hand, LNM was found in 70% of patients with pT3-4. Among 36 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), LNM around the pancreatic head was observed, regardless of the duodenal cancer site, including the duodenal bulb and the third to the fourth portion.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologic grade G2-G4, presence of LNM, pT3-T4, and elevated preoperative CA19-9 were the independent poor prognostic factors in patients with resected DC. Our results suggested that lymph node dissection could be omitted for DC Tis-T1a. Moreover, based on the high frequency of LNM in T3-4 cases, PD with lymph node dissection in the pancreatic head region was considered necessary for T3-4 DC at any site.

Rare resected eight cases of duodenal adenocarcinomas

INTRODUCTION

Duodenal adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy; recently, it has been found to be accompanied by operative indications.

METHODS

Nine consecutive rare cases were diagnosed with duodenal carcinoma (DC), in which clinicopathological characteristics were retrospectively examined. Age was ranged over middle-aged males and females. No clinical onset with severe symptoms was observed, and the specific treatment for accompanied diseases or habits was not found.

OUTCOMES

One case of two T1 stage DCs that underwent pancreas-sparing duodenectomy. Stage II DC was diagnosed in three cases, and stage III DC was diagnosed in four cases. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) mainly occurred in seven patients, and duodenectomy was limited in two patients. All operations were safely performed, and the postoperative course showed no severe morbidity. Histological findings showed R0 resection in eight cases and R1 at the retroperitoneal dissecting part in one case. Five patients with advanced-stage DC underwent adjuvant chemotherapy; however, four patients showed tumor recurrence within 12 months. With additional strong chemotherapy, eight patients survived up to 84 months, and one died of liver metastasis at 43 months after surgery. Three representative cases of mucosal invasion with widespread pancreas-sparing duodenectomy and advanced-stage DC cases undergoing duodenectomy or PD are shown.

CONCLUSION

In the field of upper digestive tract surgery, duodenal adenocarcinoma and various applications of surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy for long-term survival are important.

Prognostic Impact of Pancreatic Invasion in Duodenal Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The prognostic factors for duodenal carcinoma (DC) remain unclear because of its rarity. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of pancreatic invasion (PI) on postoperative survival for patients with DC.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 86 patients with DC, including 18 patients with PI, who underwent surgical resection between October 2002 and March 2018. The clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes of these patients were investigated to identify the prognostic factors in DC. The long-term survival for the DC patients with PI was compared with that for the patients who underwent resection for resectable pancreatic head carcinoma (RPHC) during the same period.

RESULTS

The median survival time (MST) for the DC patients with PI was 25.7 months, which was significantly worse than for the patients with T2 or deeper DC without PI (p = 0.010). The multivariate analysis showed that the independent prognostic factors were PI (hazard ratio [HR] 7.59; p = 0.019) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) (HR 5.01; p = 0.026). The MST for the DC patients with PI did not differ significantly from that for the RPHC patients treated without adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.135). Comparable rates of microscopic venous invasion and hematogenous metastasis were observed for the DC patients with PI and the RPHC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic invasion was an independent prognostic factor in DC. The survival outcomes for the DC patients with PI did not differ from those for the patients with RPHC, which was associated with a high rate of hematogenous recurrence.