Amino acid pharmacokinetics and safety assessment

Human milk extracellular vesicles enhance muscle growth and physical performance of immature mice associating with Akt/mTOR/p70s6k signaling pathway

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play an important role in human and bovine milk composition. According to excellent published studies, it also exerts various functions in the gut, bone, or immune system. However, the effects of milk-derived EVs on skeletal muscle growth and performance have yet to be fully explored. Firstly, the current study examined the amino acids profile in human milk EVs (HME) and bovine milk EVs (BME) using targeted metabolomics. Secondly, HME and BME were injected in the quadriceps of mice for four weeks (1 time/3 days). Then, related muscle performance, muscle growth markers/pathways, and amino acids profile were detected or measured by grip strength analysis, rotarod performance testing, Jenner-Giemsa/H&E staining, Western blotting, and targeted metabolomics, respectively. Finally, HME and BME were co-cultured with C2C12 cells to detect the above-related indexes and further testify relative phenomena. Our findings mainly demonstrated that HME and BME significantly increase the diameter of C2C12 myotubes. HME treatment demonstrates higher exercise performance and muscle fiber densities than BME treatment. Besides, after KEGG and correlation analyses with biological function after HME and BME treatment, results showed L-Ornithine acts as a "notable marker" after HME treatment to affect mouse skeletal muscle growth or functions. Otherwise, L-Ornithine also significantly positively correlates with the activation of the AKT/mTOR pathway and myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) and can also be observed in muscle and C2C12 cells after HME treatment. Overall, our study not only provides a novel result for the amino acid composition of HME and BME, but the current study also indicates the advantage of human milk on skeletal muscle growth and performance.

Tolerable Upper Intake Level for Individual Amino Acids in Humans: A Narrative Review of Recent Clinical Studies

Individual amino acids are widely popular as supplements because of various perceived and real health benefits. However, currently, there are no recommendations set by national health agencies for tolerable upper intake levels (UL) for amino acids because of a lack of well-conducted human dose-response trials. In the past decade, under the initiative of the International Council on Amino Acid Science, a nonprofit organization, a series of UL human clinical studies were conducted. The goal of this narrative review is to summarize the studies on 6 essential amino acids (leucine, tryptophan, methionine, lysine, histidine, and phenylalanine), 2 nonessential amino acids (arginine and serine), and 2 nonproteinogenic amino acids (ornithine and citrulline) and provide the first set of ULs. A brief background of the concept of the DRI framework of UL, the concept of UL for amino acids, and a perspective of the results are also provided. The data suggest that in relatively healthy adult individuals, the tested amino acids are well tolerated, and ULs, or the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL), lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL), can be determined. The ULs were for leucine-young (35 g/d), tryptophan (4.5 g/d), and leucine-elderly (30 g/d); NOAEL and LOAEL for methionine at 3.2 and 6.4 g/d, respectively; NOAEL for arginine (30 g/d); NOAEL and LOAEL for lysine at 6 and 7.5 g/d, respectively; NOAEL and LOAEL for histidine at 8 and 12 g/d, respectively; and NOAEL for phenylalanine (12 g/d), serine (12 g/d), ornithine (12 g/d) and citrulline (24 g/d). This first set of human UL data are hoped to help national and international agencies set safety standards for supplemental amino acids.

An Integrative Biology Approach to Quantify the Biodistribution of Azidohomoalanine In Vivo

Background

Identification and quantitation of newly synthesized proteins (NSPs) are critical to understanding protein dynamics in development and disease. Probing the nascent proteome can be achieved using non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs) to selectively label the NSPs utilizing endogenous translation machinery, which can then be quantitated with mass spectrometry. We have previously demonstrated that labeling the in vivo murine proteome is feasible via injection of azidohomoalanine (Aha), an ncAA and methionine (Met) analog, without the need for Met depletion. Aha labeling can address biological questions wherein temporal protein dynamics are significant. However, accessing this temporal resolution requires a more complete understanding of Aha distribution kinetics in tissues.

Results

To address these gaps, we created a deterministic, compartmental model of the kinetic transport and incorporation of Aha in mice. Model results demonstrate the ability to predict Aha distribution and protein labeling in a variety of tissues and dosing paradigms. To establish the suitability of the method for in vivo studies, we investigated the impact of Aha administration on normal physiology by analyzing plasma and liver metabolomes following various Aha dosing regimens. We show that Aha administration induces minimal metabolic alterations in mice.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that we can reproducibly predict protein labeling and that the administration of this analog does not significantly alter in vivo physiology over the course of our experimental study. We expect this model to be a useful tool to guide future experiments utilizing this technique to study proteomic responses to stimuli.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-023-00760-4.

Population Pharmacokinetic Model of AST-001, L-Isomer of Serine, Combining Endogenous Production and Exogenous Administration in Healthy Subjects

AST-001 is an L-isomer of serine that has protective effects on neurological disorders. This study aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of AST-001 in healthy Korean to further propose a fixed-dose regimen in pediatrics. The model was constructed using 648 plasma concentrations from 24 healthy subjects, including baseline endogenous levels during 24 h and concentrations after a single dose of 10, 20, and 30 g of AST-001. For the simulation, an empirical allometric power model was applied to the apparent clearance and volume of distribution with body weight. The PK characteristics of AST-001 after oral administration were well described by a two-compartment model with zero-order absorption and linear elimination. The endogenous production of AST-001 was well explained by continuous zero-order production at a rate of 0.287 g/h. The simulation results suggested that 2 g, 4 g, 7 g, 10 g, and 14 g twice-daily regimens for the respective groups of 10–14 kg, 15–24 kg, 25–37 kg, 38–51 kg, 52–60 kg were adequate to achieve sufficient exposure to AST-001. The current population PK model well described both observed endogenous production and exogenous administration of AST-001 in healthy subjects. Using the allometric scaling approach, we suggested an optimal fixed-dose regimen with five weight ranges in pediatrics for the upcoming phase 2 trial.

Potential pitfalls of health claims from a public health nutrition perspective

The European Union is implementing a new regulatory framework for nutrition and health claims (HCs) that will greatly impact the communication of health messages on foodstuffs. In particular, approved HCs will be included in a positive register of generic claims. In the currently available literature, assessment of the relevance of HCs has mainly been related to scientific substantiation, and the issue of relevance in terms of public health has tended to be overlooked. Interestingly, the new regulation states that claims must be well understood by the average consumer. This article delves beyond the issue of scientific substantiation of claims and reviews possible discrepancies between consumer perception/understanding of HCs and the public health nutrition reality, which can confuse or mislead the consumer and ultimately impact public health nutrition. Six pitfalls are described herein and a comprehensive overview of the critical examination of any HC is proposed.

Parenteral amino acid intakes in critically ill children: a matter of convenience

BACKGROUND

Parenteral and enteral amino acid requirements for nutrition balance and function have not been defined in critically ill children or adults. In addition to playing a role in protein synthesis, amino acids trigger signaling cascades that regulate various aspects of fuel and energy metabolism and serve as precursors for important substrates. Amino acids can also be toxic. In this study, parenteral intakes of essential and nonessential amino acids (EAAs and NEAAs) supplied to critically ill children were assessed as an initial step for further studies aimed at establishing parenteral amino acid requirements.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted to assess intakes of parenteral amino acid for 116 critically ill children, and these intakes were compared with EAA intakes recommended by the Institute of Medicine. Because there are no recommended intakes for NEAA, NEAA intakes were compared with mixed muscle protein content in the older children and breast milk amino acid content in the infants.

RESULTS

Parenteral EAAs were provided in amounts that exceeded recommended intakes for healthy children, except for phenylalanine and methionine, which although excessive, were given in less generous amounts. NEAAs were supplied in lower or higher amounts than the content of mixed muscle proteins or breast milk. Parenteral amino acid formulas are limited in taurine, glutamine, and asparagine despite the fact that inflammatory/immune proteins are rich in these amino acids.

CONCLUSIONS

Amino acid composition of parenteral formulas is variable and lacks scientific support. Parenteral amino acid intakes should be based on measured requirements to maintain nutrition and functional balance and on knowledge of toxicity.

Nutrient risk assessment: setting upper levels and an opportunity for harmonization

Upper levels are estimates of the quantity of a nutrient that can be ingested daily over a lifetime without appreciable risk to health. The approach to establishing upper levels for nutrients, nutrient risk assessment, has derived from the risk assessment of foreign chemicals that are deliberately added to foods, or are in food as contaminants. This process of risk assessment is rigorous and transparent, particularly in dealing with the uncertainty arising from the data available and their assessment and extrapolation to human populations. Hazard identification and characterization, i.e., a dose-response pattern, as applied to xenobiotics, are discussed first, and then the difficulties of applying this approach to nutrients are reviewed. Nutrients, in contrast to foreign chemicals, have specific and selective metabolic pathways and homeostasis, as well as specific functions. This is the source of differences in the nutrient risk assessments produced by various national and international advisory bodies. Although the same data are used in such exercises, different judgments are made about identifying adverse effects, the nature of uncertainties in the assessment, and in matching the upper levels with exposure assessments and dietary reference values. The establishment of different upper levels for different national and international communities is a source of confusion in public health policy and practice and a barrier to trade. It is proposed that a basis for harmonizing the existing approaches used in nutrient risk assessment would be the collaborative development of the model for establishing upper levels of intake for nutrients and related substances that has been recently described by a Joint Task Force of the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization.

Screening of toxicity biomarkers for methionine excess in rats

Although many animal studies have reported that dietary excess of methionine causes toxic changes including growth suppression and hemolytic anemia, the biochemical mechanism and biomarkers for methionine toxicity have not been well elucidated. The present study aimed to identify toxicity biomarkers from plasma metabolites in rats fed excessive methionine. Young growing rats were fed graded doses of additional methionine for 2 wk. Cluster analysis of multivariate correlations was performed on the physiological and toxicity variables with plasma metabolites detected by GC/MS, amino acid analyzer, and thiol-specific analysis. Indicative variables for hemolysis such as splenic nonheme iron content and plasma bilirubin were grouped in the same cluster as many methionine metabolites. Homocysteine and some undefined metabolites in this cluster were found to be strong discriminators between nontoxic and toxic levels of methionine intake. Product-to-precursor ratios of each methionine metabolite demonstrated that excessive methionine intake caused a marked decrease only in the ratio of cystathionine to homocysteine, suggesting that metabolism from homocysteine to cystathionine would be rate limiting in the disposal of excessive methionine. Collectively from these results, homocysteine appeared to be the most plausible biomarker to assess methionine excess as a surrogate marker both for toxicity and for setting a metabolic upper limit.

Introduction to the 5th Amino Acid Assessment Workshop

Amino acids (AAs) may be consumed at intakes above those that could be obtained from the normal diet, to promote health status in certain specific situations (e.g., sports training, aging). In this context, the relevant AAs may be used at high intake levels, which may in turn trigger adverse effects. There is little information on the adverse effects or pathophysiological consequences of excessive intakes of individual amino acids or mixtures. Hence, a series of workshops (named AAAW) are being organized to bring together experts in the fields of amino acid metabolism and nutritional effects, cell and molecular biology, toxicology, and regulatory issues and policy, with the aim of establishing a paradigm for the characterization of risks associated with specific intakes of amino acids by humans. The first 3 workshops covered general aspects concerning AAs (functions, risk characterization, differences in subpopulations, definition of surrogate markers, etc.). The fourth AAAW focused on branched-chain AAs. The articles in this supplement issue of the journal summarize the fifth workshop in the series, which focused on sulfur amino acids.

Potential approaches to the assessment of amino acid adequacy in rats: a progress report

We report on research progress on two approaches that may be useful in determining the upper adequacy range for macronutrients such as amino acids. One approach was to attempt to identify "toxic metabolites" that were responsible for toxicity or biomarkers for the toxicity of excessive intake of an amino acid in rats. We found that there was hepatic toxicity that was specifically associated with L-cystine excess, but not with L-cysteine excess. We analyzed urine samples from rats fed basal diets or L-cystine or L-cysteine excess diets and identified 25 peaks from gas chromatography mass spectrometry analysis that were specific for L-cystine excess and also correlated with toxicity markers. Another approach was to try to identify "metabolic limits" by measuring CO(2) arising from amino acid excess. Uniformly (13)C labeled L-leucine was used as tracer, in diets with added L-leucine fed to rats, and (13)CO(2) arising from its metabolism was collected over 24 h and the fraction of the ingested L-leucine that was exhaled as CO(2) was calculated. The fractional exhalation of (13)CO(2) increased with increasing L-leucine dose, but showed an inflexion point at approximately 8.9 g/kg body weight, after which it reached a plateau. This suggested that >8.9 g/kg BW, the catabolism of L-leucine changed and this approximately coincided with the dose above which a statistically significant decrease in body weight was seen.

Establishing the upper end of the range of adequate and safe intakes for amino acids: a toxicologist's viewpoint

The safety assessment of high intake levels of individual amino acids cannot be based on data from nutritional studies with proteins. Routine toxicity tests designed to investigate a wide range of possible effects should be undertaken for hazard identification and characterization using studies selected to mirror the predicted pattern and duration of human exposure. The approach used to establish an acceptable daily intake level for additives and pesticides, based on defining a "no observed adverse effect" level in the experimental study and dividing by uncertainty factors that allow for species differences and human variability, has a long history of use for foreign compounds and would provide a suitable basis for determining health-based guidance values for single amino acids. The usual default uncertainty factors for toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics should be replaced by compound-specific values if suitable data are available. In addition, the usual uncertainty factors should be modified to more relevant default values based on species differences and human variability in the biodisposition of amino acids in general or of groups of metabolically interrelated amino acids. There would be no significant health concerns if the human intake levels were below a health-based guidance value developed using this approach. A population-distribution approach could be used to define the magnitude of any risk at intake levels above the guidance value.

The Smallest Vertebrate, Teleost Fish, Can Utilize Synthetic Dipeptide-Based Diets

In vitro studies of brush-border intestinal transport of dipeptides and cytoplasmic hydrolysis in fish suggest that these processes could be key mechanisms in the absorption and utilization of nutrients for growth. However, in vivo experimentation to study the nutritional importance of these processes was needed. We compared three dietary formulations based on free, peptide and protein sources of amino acids. Our results were the first to show that a synthetic dipeptide (PP)-based diet could support growth in the early stages of ontogenesis of a teleost fish, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), whereas a free amino acid (FAA)-based diet failed. We found that fish fed an FAA-based diet had an increased rate of ammonia excretion [1.78 +/- 0.19 mmol NH(3)-N/(kg body wt.h)], compared with fish fed a PP-based diet [1.25 +/- 0.07 mmol NH(3)-N/(kg body wt.h)], suggesting that deamination is involved in the metabolism of dietary FAA. Teleost fish are known to obtain a high proportion of total energy from protein, compared with higher vertebrates. However, we found that feeding trout alevins a PP-based diet increased postprandial oxygen consumption for 2 to 24 h, whereas other treatments decreased 24-h postprandial metabolism. This may indicate that peptide metabolism is less efficient than protein metabolism. Juvenile rainbow trout differed from alevins in their response to FAA- and PP-based diets. These observations strongly suggest that intestinal dietary peptide transport and hydrolysis could support protein synthesis and growth in vertebrates that respond poorly to FAA-based diets. We conclude that nutrient administration may be improved by manipulating dietary peptide composition and peptide/protein ratios, leading to better utilization of synthetic peptides, with nutritional and therapeutic implications for all vertebrates.