Standard chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: randomized phase III EORTC study

Carfilzomib in combination with R-CHOP for initial treatment of patients with non-germinal center diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter, single arm, phase 1/2 study

We performed a phase I/II trial to explore the safety and efficacy of carfilzomib (K) in combination with R-CHOP (KR-CHOP) in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A total of 48 patients were enrolled and 47 were treated. The overall response rate (ORR) was 89% (70% complete response). At a median follow-up of 31 months, 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS and OS were 79% and 87%, respectively. Treatment with KR-CHOP for non-GC DLBCL was associated with a decreased risk of disease progression and death relative to standard of care treatment with R-CHOP with hazard ratios (HR) of 0.16 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.58, p = 0.002] and 0.31 [(95% CI, 0.09 - 0.99), p = 0.02], respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were anemia (13%), thrombocytopenia (9%) and febrile neutropenia (9%). KR-CHOP is safe and may have preferential activity in non-GC DLBCL.

Lenalidomide in combination with rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose ARA-C and cisplatinum as salvage therapy in refractory or relapsed aggressive B-cell non-hodgkin-lymphoma - an open-label, multicentre phase I/II study (DSHNHL-R6)

Treatment of relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma (aNHL) is still an unmet medical need. Platinum-containing salvage immunotherapies achieve remission rates of 40-60%. The phase I/II DSHNHL-R6 trial sought to investigate feasibility, safety and efficacy of R-DHAP plus lenalidomide in patients with first or subsequent relapse of aNHL. 33 patients were enrolled in the trial and could be analyzed (ITT). Lenalidomide dose was stepwise increased if no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for lenalidomide in combination with R-DHAP was 15 mg administered on days 1-7 of each cycle. The overall response rates (ORR; defined as complete, unconfirmed complete or partial remission; using the revised response criteria by CT) and complete response rates (CR) rates were 60.6% and 27.3% for the ITT-population and 81.3% and 50.0% in the patients treated as per protocol (PP). With a median follow-up of 13.9 months, the median OS was 21.2 months and PFS for the ITT and PP-population were 10.7 and 18.9 months respectively. No treatment related deaths were observed. Haematologic adverse events (77% grade 3-4) were common. Combining Lenalidomide with R-DHAP is an effective salvage therapy for patients with aNHL. Prolonged use of lenalidomide lead to more toxicities. (registered at www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu ; EudraCT number: 2009-010824-25; Start Date: 2010-04-12).

High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous or Allogeneic Transplantation in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma-Is There Still a Role?

Novel therapies such as CAR-T, BTK inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors have changed the management of aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Nonetheless, these novel therapies have their own risk of late toxicities including second malignancies. They also create a subgroup of patients with relapse, treatment failure, or indefinite maintenance. We discuss the current role of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in this context. In patients with recurrent diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, CAR-T cell treatment has largely replaced autologous transplant. Autologous transplant should be considered in patients with late relapses and in selected patients with T-cell-rich B-cell lymphoma, where CAR-T cell therapy may be less effective. It also remains the treatment of choice for consolidation of patients with primary CNS lymphoma. In mantle cell lymphoma, intensive chemotherapy combined with BTK inhibitors and rituximab results in excellent outcomes, and the role of autologous transplantation is declining. In Hodgkin's lymphoma, autologous transplant consolidation remains the standard of care for patients who failed initial chemotherapy. Allogeneic transplantation has lower relapse rates but more complications and higher non-relapse mortality than autologous transplantation. It is usually reserved for patients who fail autologous transplantation or in whom autologous stem cells cannot be collected. It may also have an important role in patients who fail CAR-T therapies. The increasing complexity of care and evolving sequencing of therapies for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas only emphasizes the importance of appropriate patient selection and optimal timing of stem cell transplantation.

[Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma of adolescents and young adults]

Lymphoma is one of the most frequent cancers in adolescent and young adults. Hodgkin Lymphoma is curable in more than 90% of cases. Recent pediatric and adults protocols aimed to decrease long term toxicities (mostly gonadic and cardiovascular) and secondary malignancies, reducing the use of alkylating agents and limiting radiation fields. Risk-adapted strategies, using positron emission tomography staging, are about to become a standard, both in adult and pediatric protocols. These approaches allow obtaining excellent results in adolescents with Hodgkin lymphoma. On the other hand, treatment of adolescents with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma raises some questions. Even through children have good outcomes when treated with risk-adapted strategies, adolescents who are between 15 and 18 years old seem to experience poorer survivals, whereas patients older than 18 years old have globally the same outcome than older adults. This category of patient needs a particular care, based on a tight coordination between adults and pediatric oncologists. Primary mediastinal lymphomas, a subtype of BLDCL frequent in young adult population, exhibits poorer outcomes in children or young adolescent population than in older ones. Taking together, B-cell lymphoma benefited from recent advances in immunotherapy (in particular with the extended utilization of rituximab) and metabolic response-adapted strategies. In conclusion, adolescent and young adult's lymphomas are very curable diseases but require a personalized management in onco-hematological units.

A review of rituximab, the first anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of B non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

Rituximab is a type I anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, which stabilizes CD20 on lipid rafts, promoting antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity activities. It is the first targeted therapy used in B-cell malignancies and has revolutionized their treatment, without excess of toxicity. In combination with chemotherapy, it has significantly improved response rates and progression-free survival and, for some of them, overall survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma. Moreover, it has been shown to improve progression-free survival in maintenance in follicular lymphoma as well as mantle cell lymphoma. Improvement of its efficacy includes exploration of resistance mechanisms, pharmacokinetics parameters, role of vitamin D and evaluation of subcutaneous route, among others.

Induction chemotherapy followed by up-front autologous stem cell transplantation may have a survival benefit in high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients

We compared the outcomes of patients with higher-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who were treated with either up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or salvage chemotherapy followed by delayed ASCT after relapse. Data for 122 DLBCL patients who underwent ASCT as up-front or salvage treatment were analyzed. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate in DLBCL patients who underwent up-front ASCT was 76.6%, and the rate for those who underwent delayed ASCT was 60.9% (p = 0.017). In a subgroup analysis of patients with a high-intermediate/high-risk age-adjusted International Prognostic Index, achievement of complete remission translated into improved OS in the up-front ASCT group, whereas patients who achieved partial remission had similar OS rates in both groups. The up-front ASCT group had improved OS in patients aged <50 years or with good performance status, whereas the OS rates of both groups were similar in patients aged ≥ 60 years or with poor performance status. When the OS outcome is analyzed by the number of factors (no complete remission during R-CHOP induction chemotherapy, age ≥ 50 years, and performance status ≥ 2), the 3-year OS rates of patients with zero or one, two, and three clinical factors were 80.2%, 51.6%, and 0%, respectively (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in higher-risk DLBCL patients, induction chemotherapy followed by up-front ASCT may have a survival benefit compared with induction chemotherapy alone in highly selected patients who have achieved a complete remission, who are aged <50 years, and who have a good performance status at diagnosis.

Consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in first remission for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: current indications and future perspective

The non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases with variable clinical outcomes. Autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) as frontline, consolidative therapy has been evaluated based upon histological subtype of NHL. In this review, we summarize the major clinical trials guiding the use of frontline ASCT in NHL. With the constantly changing landscape of upfront therapy and multiple promising novel agents, the ability to conduct randomized trials to evaluate the benefit of consolidative ASCT is not only challenging but may be considered by some an inept utilization of resources. Our recommendation for consolidative ASCT is based on analyzing the current available data.

Autologous transplantation as consolidation for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of autologous stem-cell transplantation during the first remission in patients with diffuse, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma classified as high-intermediate risk or high risk on the International Prognostic Index remains controversial and is untested in the rituximab era.

METHODS

We treated 397 patients who had disease with an age-adjusted classification of high risk or high-intermediate risk with five cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP plus rituximab. Patients with a response were randomly assigned to receive three additional cycles of induction chemotherapy (control group) or one additional cycle of induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (transplantation group). The primary efficacy end points were 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 370 induction-eligible patients, 253 were randomly assigned to the transplantation group (125) or the control group (128). Forty-six patients in the transplantation group and 68 in the control group had disease progression or died, with 2-year progression-free survival rates of 69 and 55%, respectively (hazard ratio in the control group vs. the transplantation group, 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 2.51; P=0.005). Thirty-seven patients in the transplantation group and 47 in the control group died, with 2-year overall survival rates of 74 and 71%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.94; P=0.30). Exploratory analyses showed a differential treatment effect according to risk level for both progression-free survival (P=0.04 for interaction) and overall survival (P=0.01 for interaction). Among high-risk patients, the 2-year overall survival rate was 82% in the transplantation group and 64% in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early autologous stem-cell transplantation improved progression-free survival among patients with high-intermediate-risk or high-risk disease who had a response to induction therapy. Overall survival after transplantation was not improved, probably because of the effectiveness of salvage transplantation. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, and others; SWOG-9704 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004031.).

Autologous transplantation as consolidation for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of autologous stem-cell transplantation during the first remission in patients with diffuse, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma classified as high-intermediate risk or high risk on the International Prognostic Index remains controversial and is untested in the rituximab era.

METHODS

We treated 397 patients who had disease with an age-adjusted classification of high risk or high-intermediate risk with five cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP plus rituximab. Patients with a response were randomly assigned to receive three additional cycles of induction chemotherapy (control group) or one additional cycle of induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (transplantation group). The primary efficacy end points were 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 370 induction-eligible patients, 253 were randomly assigned to the transplantation group (125) or the control group (128). Forty-six patients in the transplantation group and 68 in the control group had disease progression or died, with 2-year progression-free survival rates of 69 and 55%, respectively (hazard ratio in the control group vs. the transplantation group, 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 2.51; P=0.005). Thirty-seven patients in the transplantation group and 47 in the control group died, with 2-year overall survival rates of 74 and 71%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.94; P=0.30). Exploratory analyses showed a differential treatment effect according to risk level for both progression-free survival (P=0.04 for interaction) and overall survival (P=0.01 for interaction). Among high-risk patients, the 2-year overall survival rate was 82% in the transplantation group and 64% in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early autologous stem-cell transplantation improved progression-free survival among patients with high-intermediate-risk or high-risk disease who had a response to induction therapy. Overall survival after transplantation was not improved, probably because of the effectiveness of salvage transplantation. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, and others; SWOG-9704 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004031.).

Autologous stem cell transplantation for aggressive lymphomas

The role of high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment armamentarium of aggressive B- and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is still a matter of debate. In the pre-Rituximab era, the PARMA study demonstrated the superiority of HDT/ASCT over conventional salvage chemotherapy in chemosensitive, relapsed patients. Subsequently, HDT/ASCT has become a standard approach for relapsed NHL. With the advent of Rituximab in the landscape of NHL, transplantation as part of first-line therapy has been challenged. However, no benefit in terms of disease-free or overall survival of HDT/ASCT over standard therapy was shown when Rituximab was added to both arms. Moreover, the superiority of HDT/ASCT over conventional salvage therapy in patients relapsing from first-line therapy including Rituximab was not confirmed. From these disappointing results, novel strategies, which can enhance the anti-lymphoma effect, at the same time reducing toxicity have been developed, with the aim of improving the outcome of HDT/ASCT in aggressive NHL. In T-cell lymphoma, few publications demonstrated that consolidation of complete remission with HDT/ASCT is safe and feasible. However, up to one-third of patients may never receive transplant, mostly due to progressive disease, and relapse still remains a major concern even after transplant.

Conventional chemotherapy (CHOEP-14) with rituximab or high-dose chemotherapy (MegaCHOEP) with rituximab for young, high-risk patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma: an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial (DSHNHL 2002-1)

BACKGROUND

High-dose therapy (HDT) followed by transplantation of autologous haemopoietic stem cells is frequently done as part of first-line therapy in young patients with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma. We investigated whether HDT with cytotoxic agents identical to those used for conventional therapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) improved survival outcome compared with conventional chemotherapy when rituximab was added to both modalities.

METHODS

We did an open-label, randomised trial comparing conventional chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone) and rituximab (R-CHOEP-14) with dose-escalated sequential HDT and rituximab (R-MegaCHOEP) followed by repetitive ASCT in high-risk (age-adjusted International Prognostic Index [IPI] 2 or 3) patients aged 18-60 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Eligible patients received radiotherapy for bulky, extranodal disease, or both. Randomisation (1:1) used the Pocock minimisation algorithm; patients were stratified by age-adjusted IPI factors, bulky disease, and centre. The primary endpoint was event-free survival. All analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00129090.

FINDINGS

136 patients were randomly assigned to R-CHOEP-14 and 139 to R-MegaCHOEP. 130 patients in the R-CHOEP-14 group and 132 in the R-MegaCHOEP group were included in the intention-to-treat population. After a median of 42 months (IQR 29-59), 3-year event-free survival was 69·5% (95% CI 61·3-77·7) in the R-CHOEP-14 group and 61·4% (52·8-70·0) in the R-MegaCHOEP group (p=0·14; hazard ratio 1·3, 95% CI 0·9-2·0). All 128 evaluable patients treated with R-MegaCHOEP had grade 4 leucopenia, as did 48 (58·5%) of 82 patients with documented blood counts in the R-CHOEP-14 group. All 128 evaluable patients in the R-MegaCHOEP group had grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, as did 26 (33·8%) of 77 patients in the R-CHOEP-14 group with documented blood counts. The most important non-haematological grade 3 or 4 adverse event was infection, which occurred in 96 (75·0%) of 128 patients treated with R-MegaCHOEP and in 40 (31·3%) of 128 patients treated with R-CHOEP-14.

INTERPRETATION

In young patients with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma, R-MegaCHOEP was not superior to conventional R-CHOEP therapy and was associated with significantly more toxic effects. R-CHOEP-14 with or without radiotherapy remains a treatment option for these patients, with encouraging efficacy.

FUNDING

Deutsche Krebshilfe.

The role of autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (DLBCL) accounting for approximately 30% of new lymphoma diagnoses in adult patients. Complete remissions (CRs) can be achieved in 45% to 55% of patients and cure in approximately 30-35% with anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy. The ageadjusted IPI (aaIPI) has been widely employed, particularly to "tailor" more intensive therapy such as high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous hemopoietic stem cell rescue (ASCT). IPI, however, has failed to reliably predict response to specific therapies. A subgroup of young patients with poor prognosis exists. To clarify the role of HDT/ASCT combined with rituximab in the front line therapy a longer follow-up and randomized studies are needed. The benefit of HDT/ASCT for refractory or relapsed DLBCL is restricted to patients with immunochemosensitive disease. Currently, clinical and biological research is focused to improve the curability of this setting of patients, mainly young.

High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation versus chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy for follicular lymphoma in adults

BACKGROUND

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent and second most common Non-Hodgkin`s lymphoma (NHL) in the Western world. Standard treatment usually includes rituximab and chemotherapy. High-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an option for patients in advanced stages or for second-line therapy, leading to improved progression-free survival (PFS) rates. However, the impact of HDT and ASCT remains unclear, as there are hints of an increased risk of second cancers.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HDT plus ASCT with chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy in patients with FL with respect to overall survival (OS), PFS, treatment-related mortality (TRM), adverse events and secondary malignancies.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE as well as conference proceedings from January 1985 to September 2011 for RCTs. Two review authors independently screened search results.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy with HDT followed by ASCT in adults with previously untreated or relapsed FL.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used hazard ratios (HR) as effect measures used for OS and PFS as well as relative risks for response rates. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search strategies led to 3046 potentially relevant references. Of these, five RCTs involving 1093 patients were included; four trials in previously untreated patients and one trial in relapsed patients. Overall, the quality of the five trials is judged to be moderate. All trials were reported as randomised and judged to be open-label studies, because usually trials evaluating stem cell transplantation are not blinded. Due to the small number of studies in each analysis (four or less), the quantification of heterogeneity was not reliable and not evaluated in further detail. A potential source of bias are uncertainties in the HR calculation. For OS, the HR had to be calculated for three trials from survival curves, for PFS for two trials.We found a statistically significant increased PFS in previously untreated FL patients in the HDT + ASCT arm (HR = 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.54; P < 0.00001). However, this effect is not transferred into a statistically significant OS advantage (HR = 0.97; 95% 0.76 to 1.24; P = 0.81). The subgroup of trials adding rituximab to both intervention arms (one trial) confirms these results and the trial had to be stopped early after an interim analysis due to a statistically significant PFS advantage in the HDT + ASCT arm (PFS: HR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.55; OS: HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.92). In the four trials in previously untreated patients there are no statistically significant differences between HDT + ASCT and the control-arm in terms of TRM (RR = 1.28; 95% CI 0.25 to 6.61; P = 0.77), secondary acute myeloid leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndromes (RR = 2.87; 95% CI 0.7 to 11.75; P = 0.14) or solid cancers (RR = 1.20; 95% CI 0.25 to 5.77; P = 0.82). Adverse events were rarely reported and were observed more frequently in patients undergoing HDT + ASCT (mostly infections and haematological toxicity).For patients with relapsed FL, there is some evidence (one trial, N = 70) that HDT + ASCT is advantageous in terms of PFS and OS (PFS: HR = 0.30; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.61; OS: HR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.89). For this trial, no results were reported for TRM, adverse events or secondary cancers.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the currently available evidence suggests a strong PFS benefit for HDT + ASCT compared with chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with FL. No statistically significant differences in terms of OS, TRM and secondary cancers were detected. These effects are confirmed in a subgroup analysis (one trial) adding rituximab to both treatment arms. Further trials evaluating this approach are needed to determine this effect more precisely in the era of rituximab. Moreover, longer follow-up data are necessary to find out whether the PFS advantage will translate into an OS advantage in previously untreated patients with FL.There is evidence that HDT + ASCT is advantageous in patients with relapsed FL.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Lymphomas

Background

The heterogeneity of lymphomas results in numerous treatment options, including both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, the type of transplantation, the timing the procedure, and the selection of suitable patients for transplant continue to evolve.

Methods

We reviewed the current medical literature to provide a succinct synthesis for the most common types of lymphoma and the indications for transplantation.

Results

This review discusses the outcomes of autologous and allogeneic transplantation for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, HIV-associated lymphomas, mantle cell lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma.

Conclusions

Each of these histologies differs in the indications and timing for transplantation. However, ongoing clinical trials support the continuing role of both autologous and allogeneic transplantation for lymphoma management.

The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: update of the 2006 evidence-based review

Clinical research published since the first evidence-based review on the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults is presented and critically evaluated in this update. Treatment recommendations changed or modified based on new evidence include: (1) myeloablative allogeneic SCT is an appropriate treatment for adult (<35 years) ALL in first complete remission for all disease risk groups; and (2) reduced-intensity conditioning may produce similar outcomes to myeloablative regimens. Treatment recommendations unchanged or strengthened by new evidence include: (1) allogeneic SCT is recommended over chemotherapy for ALL in second complete remission or greater; (2) allogeneic is superior to autologous SCT; and (3) there are similar survival outcomes after related and unrelated allogeneic SCT. New treatment recommendations based on new evidence include: (1) in the absence of a suitable allogeneic donor, autologous SCT may be an appropriate therapy, but results in a high relapse rate; (2) it is appropriate to consider cord blood transplantation for patients with no HLA well-matched donor; and (3) imatinib therapy before and/or after SCT (for Ph+ ALL) yields significantly superior survival outcomes. Areas of needed research in the treatment of adult ALL with SCT were identified and presented in the review.

The Allogeneic Effect in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been restricted to medically fit patients under the age of 55 years due to adverse effects of the intensive conditioning regimens. Autologous HSCT has not proven to be a particularly effective treatment for patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Much of the benefit of allogeneic HSCT appears to be mediated by a graft-vs.-tumor (GVT) effect. Reduced-intensity regimens in allogeneic HSCT have been developed to minimize conditioning regimen-related toxicities and to control the malignancy until a GVT effect is established. A number of studies investigating reduced-intensity allogeneic HSCT are discussed. Results from these studies suggest that indications for allogeneic transplant include patients with low-grade NHL with a sibling or matched donor who are under 60 years of age; young patients with mantle cell lymphoma who are in first remission and have a sibling or matched donor; patients with high-grade NHL who have already failed an autograft but have chemosensitive disease, and those under 30 years of age who have poor-risk disease and are in first remission. It is concluded that reduction in treatment-related mortality with reduced-intensity HSCT and the presence of GVT effects increases the applicability of allogeneic transplantation for NHL. However, treatment will be improved by optimizating conditioning regimens and a better understanding of patient selection criteria and the immune processes involved in graft-vs.-host disease and GVT.

Transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma

High-dose therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) has become the treatment of choice for patients with relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure after auto-HCT. More intensive regimens incorporating radioimmunotherapy into high-dose regimens have been developed to prevent relapse. The role of auto-HCT for follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma remain inconclusive. Since prognosis of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified are very poor with conventional chemotherapy, auto-HCT during first remission is being explored in peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Given the lower risk of relapse after allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) in NHL, allo-HCT has been performed in patients with refractory or relapsed NHL, especially after auto-HCT failure. However, the transplant-related mortality remains high after myeloablative allo-HCT. Reduced-intensity conditioning followed by allo-HCT has been shown to reduce transplant-related mortality but graft-versus-host disease continues to be the major problem, thus the role of allo-HCT in NHL remains an investigational approach for NHL. The outcomes of auto-HCT and allo-HCT for various lymphomas are reviewed.

Outcome and toxicity associated with a dose-intensified, maintenance-free CHOP-based chemotherapy protocol in canine lymphoma: 130 cases

A dose-intensified/dose-dense chemotherapy protocol for canine lymphoma was designed and implemented at the Veterinary Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. In this study, we describe the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, efficacy and toxicity in 130 dogs treated with this protocol. The majority of the dogs had advanced stage disease (63.1% stage V) and sub-stage b (58.5%). The median time to progression (TTP) and lymphoma-specific survival were 219 and 323 days, respectively. These results are similar to previous less dose-intense protocols. Sub-stage was a significant negative prognostic factor for survival. The incidence of toxicity was high; 53.9 and 45% of the dogs needed dose reductions and treatment delays, respectively. Dogs that required dose reductions and treatment delays had significantly longer TTP and lymphoma-specific survival times. These results suggest that dose density is important, but likely relative, and needs to be adjusted according to the individual patient's toxicity for optimal outcome.

Unresolved issues in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas

For more than 25 years, the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) was considered the 'gold standard' for the treatment of aggressive lymphomas, 90% of which are diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs). After the demonstration of rituximab's single-agent activity in DLBCL, a pivotal trial in elderly patients demonstrated that combining rituximab with eight applications of CHOP significantly improved complete remission rates, and event-free and overall survival rates compared with CHOP alone. These positive results have meanwhile been confirmed by two additional randomized trials and have been extended to young patients with good-prognosis DLBCL by a fourth trial and rituximab, in combination with CHOP, has become accepted worldwide as the new standard for all DLBCL. Remaining issues concern biology-based approaches and the guidance of therapy by PET, the definition of the optimal dosage and schedule of rituximab for DLBCL, as well as the optimal chemotherapy regimen partner for rituximab. Finally, patients failing after rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy have a dismal prognosis and the treatment of these patients has become a prime challenge in the rituximab era.

Study of conditioning regimens with or without high-dose radiotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for treating aggressive lymphoma

The aim and objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of conditioning regimens with or without high-dose radiotherapy for treating aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Eighty-nine aggressive NHL patients who underwent high-dose therapy in combination with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) between 1993 and 2006 were retrospectively studied. HDT was either high-dose chemotherapy alone (CT) or high-dose chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Overall, 37 patients in CT group and 52 in CRT group. The median radiotherapy DT in CRT group was 8 Gy. The median count of reinfused CD34+ cells was 6.26 x 10(6) and 22.16 x 10(6) cells/kg, respectively (p < 0.001). The median time of leukocyte engraftment was 11 days in CT group and 13 days in CRT group (p = 0.003), and the median platelet engraftment time was 12 days in CT group and 11 days in CRT group (p = 0.305). The median event-free survival (EFS) was 102 and 84 months in CT and CRT groups, respectively (p = 0.783), and the median overall survival (OS) was 102 and 121 months in CT and CRT groups, respectively (p = 0.857). Prolonged hospitalization favored EFS (p = 0.013) and OS (p = 0.011). In conclusion, when compared with CT, high-dose CRT does not improve prognosis.

Front-line therapy for nonlocalized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: what has been demonstrated and what is yet to be established

The field of treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has been in a continuous flux over the last 10-15 years owing to the introduction of new therapeutic approaches such as dose-dense chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies and high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant. The use of clinical prognostic factors has improved our ability to predict the outcome of these lymphomas; moreover, the gene and protein expression pattern has been shown, at least in the pre-rituximab era, to be an independent and powerful prognostic indicator. This review will focus on results obtained in the last decade by large clinical trials evaluating the first-line therapy in nonlocalized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; special emphasis will be placed on more mature results that can be indicated as 'standard' therapy. Ongoing studies addressing as yet unanswered or controversial questions will be analyzed, and preliminary data will be critically reviewed.

Multidrug resistance-associated protein-overexpressing teniposide-resistant human lymphomas undergo apoptosis by a tubulin-binding agent

Several DNA- and microtubule-binding agents are used to manage hematologic malignancies in the clinic. However, drug resistance has been a challenge, perhaps due to a few surviving cancer stem cells. Toxicity is another major impediment to successful chemotherapy, leading to an impoverished quality of life. Here, we show that a semisynthetic nontoxic tubulin-binding agent, 9-bromonoscapine (EM011), effectively inhibits growth and regresses multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP)-overexpressing teniposide-resistant T-cell lymphoma xenografts and prolongs longevity. As expected, teniposide treatment failed to regress teniposide-resistant xenografts, rather, treated mice suffered tremendous body weight loss. Mechanistically, EM011 displays significant antiproliferative activity, perturbs cell cycle progression by arresting mitosis, and induces apoptosis in teniposide-resistant lymphoblastoid T cells both in vitro and in vivo. EM011-induced apoptosis has a mitochondrially-mediated component, which was attenuated by pretreatment with cyclosporin A. We also observed alterations of apoptosis-regulatory molecules such as inactivation of Bcl2, translocation of BAX to the mitochondrial membrane, cytochrome c release, and activation of downstream apoptotic signaling. EM011 caused DNA degradation as evident by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin end labeling staining of the increased concentration of 3'-DNA ends. Furthermore, the apoptotic induction was caspase dependent as shown by cleavage of the caspase substrate, poly(ADP)ribose polymerase. In addition, EM011 treatment caused a suppression of natural survival pathways such as the phosphatidylinositol-3'-kinase/Akt signaling. These preclinical findings suggest that EM011 is an excellent candidate for clinical evaluation.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma

High-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells (ASCT) is frequently performed in patients with lymphoma. For many subentities, reliable results from prospective randomized studies are missing. In Hodgkin's disease (HD), HDT/ASCT is a standard indication for patients with chemosensitive first relapse. Patients with indolent or aggressive B-cell lymphoma may benefit from HDT/ASCT if considered as part of first-line therapy or at the time of relapse. However, new randomized studies comparing HDT/ASCT with optimal chemoimmunotherapy are necessary because the introduction of monoclonal antibodies (rituximab) significantly improved the results of conventional chemotherapy. Because data on patients with less frequent entities like mantle cell lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, Burkitt's lymphoma, or lymphoblastic lymphoma are insufficient, the role of HDT/ASCT needs further study.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in the first line treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in adults

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (HDT) has been proven effective in relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, conflicting results of HDT as part of first-line treatment have been reported in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of such treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation as part of first-line treatment improves survival in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancer Lit, the Cochrane Library and smaller databases, Internet-databases of ongoing trials, conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology were searched. We included full-text, abstract publications and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing conventional chemotherapy versus high-dose chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of adults with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eligibility and quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were done in duplicate. All authors were contacted to obtain missing data and asked to provide individual patient data.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs including 3079 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. Overall treatment-related mortality was 6.0% in the HDT group and not significantly different compared to conventional chemotherapy (OR 1.33 [95% CI 0.91 to 1.93], P=0.14). 13 studies including 2018 patients showed significantly higher CR rates in the group receiving HDT (OR 1.32, [95% CI 1.09 to 1.59], P=0.004). However, HDT did not have an effect on OS, when compared to conventional chemotherapy. The pooled HR was 1.04 ([95% CI 0.91 to 1.18], P=0.58). There was no statistical heterogeneity among the trials. Sensitivity analyses underlined the robustness of these results. Subgroup analysis of prognostic groups according to IPI did not show any survival difference between HDT and controls in 12 trials (low and low-intermediate risk IPI: HR 1.41[95% CI 0.95 to 2.10], P=0.09; high-intermediate and high risk IPI: HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.83 to 1.13], P=0.71. Event-free survival (EFS) also showed no significant difference between HDT and CT (HR 0.93, [95% CI 0.81 to 1.07], P=0.31). Other possible risk factors such as the proportion of patient with diffuse large cell lymphoma, protocol adherence, HDT strategy, response status before HDT, conditioning regimens and methodological issues were analysed in sensitivity analyses. However, there was no evidence for an association between these factors and the results of our analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

. Despite higher CR rates, there is no benefit for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation as a first line treatment in patients with aggressive NHL.

Dose dense (CEOP-14) vs dose dense and rituximab (CEOP-14 +R) in high-risk diffuse large cell lymphoma

To assess efficacy and toxicity of rituximab and dose chemotherapy in high-risk diffuse large cell lymphoma, we conducted a controlled clinical trial to assess efficacy and toxicity of a dose-dense regimen CEOP- 14 (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, and prednisone every 14 d) compared to CEOP-14 plus rituximab. One hundred and ninety-six patients were randomized to received CEOP-rituximab (cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m2, epirubicin 120 mg/m2, vincristine, and prednisone at standard dose and rituximab at 375 mg/m2) compared with the same chemotherapy administered every 14 d (CEOP-14). In an intent-to-treat analysis all patients were available for efficacy and toxicity. Complete response in CEOP-14 was observed in 73 cases (74%) and in 75 patients (76%) in the CEOP-R regimen (76%) (p = 0.8). With a median follow-up of 53.4 mo, median has not been reached in time to tumor-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Actuarial curves at 5 yr showed that TTP and OS in patients treated with CEOP-R were 74% and 67%, respectively, that were not statistical different when compared to CEOP-14, 72% and 65%, respectively (p = 0.8). Acute toxicity was mild and well tolerated. The use of a dense-dose regimen is useful and well tolerated in patients with very high risk diffuse large cell lymphoma. The addition of rituximab did not improve outcome in these setting of patients.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is one of the most common subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is a heterogeneous disease, and a distinctive subgroup of patients with different treatment outcome can be identified based on clinical and molecular prognostic factors. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy has been the standard systemic therapy for this disease with a cure rate of 40% to 50%, although, more recently, the addition of rituximab has been shown in phase III trials to confer a significant survival benefit in both older and younger patients. To further improve on the treatment outcome of this disease, dose-dense, and/or dose-intense regimens have been developed and tested against CHOP. However, these regimens are not yet accepted as standard therapy because of the increased toxicity as well as the uncertain benefit over CHOP with rituximab. In patients with localized DLBCL, available randomized trials suggest that radiation therapy improves local control and disease-free survival and that the addition of radiation therapy cannot replace inadequate chemotherapy.

Long-Term Results of a Phase-I/II Study of Sequential High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in the Initial Treatment of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Aims and Background

To improve the survival of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, we evaluated a risk-adapted therapeutic approach using high-dose (HD) or conventional-dose (CD) chemotherapy (CT) for poor-risk and good-risk patients, respectively.

Methods

Twenty patients were treated in each group. In both groups, the first chemotherapy cycle consisted of dexamethasone, vincristine, ifosfamide, and etoposide. Thereafter, the CD or HD patients received 3 or 2 cycles of dexamethasone, vincristine, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, respectively, followed by 1 cycle of dexamethasone, carboplatin, and etoposide. In the HD group cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, carboplatin, and etoposide were dose-escalated by a factor of 6, 3, 3, and 3, respectively, as compared to the CD group, and autologous peripheral blood stem cells were administered after each HD-CT cycle.

Results

Grade III-IV toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (100%), anemia (55%), and stomatitis (30%) in patients with HD-CT, and neutropenia (90%) in patients with CD-CT. One toxic death occurred in a patient with HD-CT. The overall response rate was 100% in HD-CT patients, including 70% complete remissions, and 80% in CD-CT patients, including 60% complete remissions. The 10-year overall survival was 55% for patients with HD-CT and 80% for patients with CD-CT.

Conclusions

The risk-adapted treatment approach showed tolerable toxicities and was associated with encouraging results.

Prolonged survival in poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma following front-line treatment with rituximab-supplemented, early-intensified chemotherapy with multiple autologous hematopoietic stem cell support: a multicenter study by GITIL (Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innovative nei Linfomi)

A prospective multicenter program was performed to evaluate the combination of rituximab and high-dose (hd) sequential chemotherapy delivered with multiple autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support (R-HDS-maps regimen) in previously untreated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLB-CL) and age-adjusted International Prognostic Score (aaIPI) score 2-3. R-HDS-maps includes: (i) three APO courses; (ii) sequential administration of hd-cyclophosphamide (CY), hd-Ara-C, both supplemented with rituximab, hd-etoposide/cisplatin, PBPC harvests, following hd-CY and hd-Ara-C; (iii) hd-mitoxantrone (hd-Mito)/L-Pam + 2 further rituximab doses; (iv) involved-field radiotherapy. PBPC rescue was scheduled following Ara-C, etoposide/cisplatin and Mito/L-Pam. Between 1999 and 2004, 112 consecutive patients aged <65 years (74 score 2, 38 score 3) entered the study protocol. There were five early and two late toxic deaths. Overall 90 patients (80%) reached clinical remission (CR); at a median 48 months follow-up, 87 (78%) patients are alive, 82 (73%) in continuous CR, with 4 year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) projections of 76% (CI 68-85%) and 73% (CI 64-81%), respectively. There were no significant differences in OS and EFS between subgroups with Germinal-Center and Activated B-cell phenotype. Thus, life expectancy of younger patients with aaIPI 2-3 DLB-CL is improved with the early administration of rituximab-supplemented intensive chemotherapy compared with the poor outcome following conventional chemotherapy.

Intensified 12-week CHOP (I-CHOP) plus G-CSF compared with standard 24-week CHOP (CHOP-21) for patients with intermediate-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 3 trial of the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON)

Optimal dose and timing of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is still an unresolved issue. We assessed whether dose intensifications with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin might improve outcome in younger patients with intermediate-risk aggressive NHL. Previously untreated patients were assigned to receive either 8 courses of standard CHOP (n = 239) or 6 courses of intensified (I)-CHOP (n = 238). Although there was a tendency in favor of I-CHOP for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival (EFS), the differences were not significant. However, although these analyses were not planned, when the intermediate-risk group was divided into low-intermediate- and high-intermediate-risk patients according to the International Prognostic Index (IPI), low-intermediate-risk patients had improved 6-year OS (67% vs 52%; P = .05), DFS (58% vs 45%; P = .06), and EFS (41% vs 30%; P = .21) when they were treated with I-CHOP compared with standard CHOP. On the other hand, high-intermediate-risk patients seem to have no benefit from I-CHOP. Although clinically relevant side effects occurred more often in the I-CHOP arm, treatment-related mortality was similar. These data suggest that I-CHOP might be preferable to standard CHOP in younger patients with low-intermediate-risk aggressive NHL.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support in first-line treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma - results of a comprehensive meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported conflicting results on the impact of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation in the first-line treatment of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

We performed a systematic meta-analysis to assess the efficacy HDCT compared to conventional chemotherapy in aggressive NHL patients with regard to complete response (CR), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), toxicity, and impact of the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) risk factors. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and other databases (1/1990 to 1/2005). Hazard ratio (HR), relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed effect model.

RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs including 2728 patients were identified. HDCT improved CR when compared to conventional chemotherapy (RR 1.11, CI 1.04-1.18). Overall, there was no evidence for HDCT to improve OS (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92-1.19) or EFS (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80-1.05) when compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, subgroup analysis indicated OS differences (p=0.032) between good (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.09) and poor risk (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81-1.11) patients. Conflicting results were reported for poor risk patients, where some studies reported improved and others reduced OS and EFS after HDCT.

CONCLUSION

There was no evidence that HDCT improved OS and EFS in good risk NHL patients. The evidence for poor risk patients is inconclusive. HDCT should not be further investigated in good risk patients with aggressive NHL but high quality studies in poor risk patients are warranted.

Dose-adjusted EPOCH plus rituximab is an effective regimen in patients with poor-prognostic untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from a prospective observational study

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of an infusional DA-EPOCH (dose-adjusted etoposide/vincristine/doxorubicin/bolus cyclophosphamide/prednisone) and rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) regimen for patients with poor prognosis diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Thirty-three patients, aged 21-76 years, with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) of 2 or 3, were enrolled, and 31/33 patients were evaluable for response. Consolidative radiation therapy was given to eight patients with bulky (> or =10 cm) disease at presentation. Overall, 26 patients (83.8%) achieved a complete remission (CR), four patients (12.9%) achieved a partial remission, and one patient (3.2%) died during induction. Two patients relapsed (7.6%) within 15 months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia developed in 52% of cycles and neutropenic fever in 14% of cycles (51% of patients). The estimates for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival at 2 years were 68% and 75% respectively. The only factor related to poor EFS was the presence of three age-adjusted IPI-risk factors. We conclude that DA-EPOCH-R has clinically significant activity with a favourable toxicity profile for poor-prognostic DLBCL patients. The administration of DA-EPOCH-R as an outpatient regimen by using a single portable infusion pump may be a feasible alternative to improve the compliance and to reduce the total cost of this very effective regimen.

Dose-intensified treatment of advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphomas

The introduction of the CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) regimen 30 years ago was the great breakthrough in the treatment of advanced-stage aggressive lymphomas. About 50% of all patients treated with CHOP achieved complete remission, and about one third experienced long-term disease-free survival and cure. Attempts to improve results by modifications of CHOP using escalated doses, additional drugs, or the alternative use of putatively non-cross-resistant chemotherapy regimens were not confirmed in randomized trials. With the availability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the tool of autologous stem cell support in the 1990s, dose escalation, dose densification (by interval reduction), or combinations thereof were pursued to increase dose intensity. While dose-escalation strategies, including high-dose approaches necessitating stem cell support, have not been demonstrated unequivocally yet to be superior to a baseline CHOP-21, dose-dense (biweekly) modifications improved the outcome of young and elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas compared to baseline CHOP-21. The challenges in the era of the monoclonal antibody rituximab are the identification of the ideal chemotherapy partner for rituximab both with respect to potential synergistic effects and to the lack of interference with its effector mechanisms. Finally, the issue of intensifying rituximab within such approaches must be addressed by appropriately designed randomized trials.

Role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced-stage diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma-B

The prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma-B (DLCL-B) is poor with conventional salvage chemotherapy; therefore, high-dose therapy (HDT) combined with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has become the treatment of choice for these patients. The outcomes of transplant are better in patients with chemosensitive relapse: those with a longer duration of first remission (>12 month) and those with an age-adjusted low-risk International Prognostic Index (IPI) at relapse. Several high-dose regimens with or without total body irradiation (TBI) have been used with similar outcomes. Relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure, and thus the use of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in the high-dose regimens and incorporation of rituximab in the transplant setting have been explored. Several studies have shown that RIT both at conventional dose and at high dose can be given in combination with high-dose chemotherapy regimens without additional toxicity or delay in hematopoietic recovery after ASCT. Additional studies using RIT in combination with high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT are ongoing, and preliminary results suggest that these approaches may be superior to conventional high-dose regimens. Since rituximab is an effective therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and given its limited toxicity, rituximab has been incorporated into HDT and ASCT for DLCL-B as in vivo purging, as part of high-dose regimens, and as maintenance therapy to prevent relapse. Preliminary results suggested that rituximab during ASCT and as maintenance therapy post-transplant reduces the risk of relapse and improves survival; however, these results need to be confirmed in phase III randomized trials. The role of ASCT during first remission as consolidative therapy in patients with DLCL-B remains controversial and should not be performed outside of the clinical trial setting. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) for patients with relapsed DLCL-B is associated with significant toxicity and should be reserved for patients who relapse after ASCT or those with persistent marrow involvement. Innovative approaches are needed for primary refractory and chemoresistant relapsed DLCL-B since these patients have very poor outcomes after ASCT.