Adaptation of an Intervention to Reduce Disparities in School HRQOL for Latino Childhood Cancer Survivors

Family partnerships to support equity and cultural humility in pediatric intervention research

OBJECTIVE

Family partnerships in community-engaged research (CEnR) can promote family-centered, equitable interventions. This paper describes the process (meeting frequency, content) of a collaborative research family partnership and related methodological modifications to support equity and cultural humility during a multi-phase project adapting and evaluating an early childhood sleep intervention (Sleep Well!) for families of primarily lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds in urban (large, metropolitan) primary care.

METHODS

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Family Partners Program consulted on initial project development. Research family partners collaborated to modify intervention content, delivery methods, and research procedures in an open-pilot (NCT04046341) and randomized controlled trial (NCT04473222). We reviewed family partners meeting agendas, presentations, and minutes to identify meeting frequency, content, and resulting project modifications and to generate related themes. Family partners also provided recommendations for researchers, including for those without existing institutional CEnR resources.

RESULTS

Ten 60-120-min meetings with 4-6 family partners occurred over 4 years. Themes representing the partnership process and project modifications included enhancing flexibility, centering cultural humility, and incorporating contextual factors (coronavirus pandemic, police violence, racism). These factors were especially relevant as project participants were primarily Black mothers and/or of lower-SES backgrounds. Family partner recommendations highlighted the need for collaborative, meaningful, and communicative relationships in pediatric intervention research.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of recommended project modifications highlights the importance of family partnerships to support equity and cultural humility in pediatric psychology research and practice. Findings also underscore the need for representation of racial and ethnic minoritized scholars and families in this work.

Reducing learning and psychosocial disparities in Latino children with cancer: a randomized intervention trial

BACKGROUND

We developed a high-intensity parenting intervention program (HIP) to help parents support the academic success of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs), who often face post-treatment challenges affecting their school-related functioning. This randomized controlled trial (NCT03178617) evaluated HIP's efficacy compared with lower-intensity, single-session, treatment-as-usual services (lower-intensity program [LIP]) in Latino families. Primary outcomes were parenting efficacy and CCSs' school functioning; secondary outcomes included parenting knowledge and measures of CCSs' academic performance, attention, and functioning outside of school.

METHODS

In total, 106 Latino survivors of childhood leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma (aged 6-12 years) and their parents were randomly assigned to HIP (n = 54) or LIP (n = 52). Linear mixed-effects models evaluated group differences across baseline, 6-month (T2), and 12-month (T3) assessments.

RESULTS

Parenting efficacy and knowledge improved significantly in the HIP arm, resulting in higher scores vs LIP at T2 and T3 (P ≤ .01). No significant between-group differences were found in child school functioning; however, HIP children showed significantly better social functioning and performance on 1 measure of attention (CPT-3 commissions) at T3 (P < .05). Although HIP adherence challenges were observed, with only 33 (61%) completing the intervention, exploratory analyses suggest that benefits were most evident among those who were fully engaged. Satisfaction and perceived benefit were greater for HIP vs LIP at both time points (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the potential value of parent-directed behavioral interventions such as HIP for CCSs and their families. Further studies are needed to address participation barriers and enhance engagement to maximize and sustain benefits.

Integrative review of school integration support following pediatric cancer

PURPOSE

This study aims to understand parents' experiences of school integration support for their child's transition to K-12 schooling during or after cancer treatment.

METHODS

This integrative literature review used PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase databases and included articles from January 2000 to July 2022 describing parent experiences with support from healthcare providers, school faculty/systems, and school integration programs. This review was guided by an adapted School Re-Entry Model and used constant comparison to identify common themes and guide synthesis. The Johns Hopkins Evidence and Quality Guide was used to appraise article quality and level of evidence.

RESULTS

Thirty-five articles were included in the final review: seventeen qualitative, fourteen quantitative, and four mixed or multi-method designs. Parents reported experiences receiving support from healthcare providers, school faculty/systems, school integration programs, and "other" sources. Parents reported both facilitators and barriers to communication, knowledge, and the process of receiving school integration support.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents found neuro/psychologists highly supportive but reported limited support from other healthcare providers. Most parents reported mixed experiences with school faculty and reported many barriers to school system support. Parents reported positive experiences with school integration programs; however, limited programs were available.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Future programs and research should focus on addressing identified barriers and facilitators of school integration support. Further work is also needed to understand a wider range of parent experiences during school integration.

The Electronic Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program-a Psychosocial Digital Health Intervention for English- and Spanish-Speaking Parents of Children With Cancer: Protocol for Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The psychosocial needs and risks of children with cancer and their families are well-documented including increased risk of parental distress, posttraumatic stress, and anxiety. There is a critical need to provide evidence-based psychosocial care to parents and caregivers of children with cancer. Digital health interventions are important to address many barriers to in-person intervention delivery but are not widely used in pediatric psychosocial cancer care. The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the need for flexible, acceptable, and accessible psychosocial digital health interventions. The Electronic Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program (eSCCIP) is an innovative digital health intervention for parents and caregivers of children with cancer, delivered through a combination of self-guided web-based content and supplemented by 3 telehealth follow-up sessions with a trained telehealth guide. A Spanish language adaptation of eSCCIP, El Programa Electronico de Intervencion para Superar Cancer Competentemente (eSCCIP-SP), has been developed. The self-guided web-based cores of eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP are a mix of didactic video content, multifamily video discussion groups featuring parents of children with cancer, and hands-on web-based activities.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to test eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP in a multisite randomized controlled trial, compared to an internet-based education control condition consisting of information specifically focused on concerns relevant to parents and caregivers of children with cancer.

METHODS

Using a randomized controlled clinical trial design, 350 eligible parents and caregivers of children with cancer will be randomly assigned to the intervention (eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP) or an education control condition. Data will be collected at 3 time points: preintervention (prior to randomization), immediately post intervention (after 6 weeks), and at a 3-month follow-up (from baseline). Participants randomized to either condition will receive study material (eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP intervention or education control website) in English or Spanish, based on the primary language spoken in the home and participant preference.

RESULTS

The primary study end point is a reduction in acute distress from baseline to postintervention, with secondary end points focused on reductions in symptoms of posttraumatic stress and anxiety, and improvements in coping self-efficacy and cognitive coping. An additional exploratory aim will be focused on implementation strategies and potential costs and cost-savings of eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP, laying the groundwork for future trials focused on dissemination and implementation, stepped-care models, and intervention refinement.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial will provide necessary data to evaluate the efficacy of eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP. This intervention has the potential to be an easily scalable and highly impactful psychosocial treatment option for parents and caregivers of children with cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05294302; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05294302.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/46339.

Introduction to the Special Issue: Addressing Health Disparities in Pediatric Psychology

This introduction to the special issue on Addressing Health Disparities in Pediatric Psychology provides context for why this special issue is needed, reviews key findings of the accepted articles, and discusses future directions for advancing the field. This special issue, one of three on this topic area that has been put forth in the history of this journal, comes at a critical point in our world. This is a time when the COVID-19 pandemic is systematically infecting Black, Indigenous, and People of Color and when there has been increased attention to systemic racism and intersecting violence inherent in multiple systems, including the justice, health, and educational systems. Using Kilbourne et al. (2016) framework, this special issue focuses on Phase 2 and Phase 3 research. Rather than only identifying health disparities (Phase 1), this issue focuses on understanding mechanisms and translating such understanding into interventions and policy changes. The accepted articles span a wide gamut from obesity to autism to rural populations. Furthermore, the articles provide methods for advancing the field beyond simply noting that systematic differences exist toward strategies to address these inequities. We conclude this introduction by discussing next steps for future research, with hopes that it inspires the next generation to study issues of disparities and inequity in deeper, more meaningful, and impactful ways.