Grit and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: Mediating Role of Health Self-Efficacy and Treatment Adherence

Spanish adolescent patients with cancer and main caregivers: Using perceptions of care to drive change in healthcare

PURPOSE

To determine whether there are differences in care experience of adolescent cancer patients and their main caregiver, treated in Adolescent Cancer Units (ACUs), compared to those treated in Non-Adolescent Cancer Units (NACUs), including the COVID-19 pandemic period.

METHOD

Measurement of Reported Experience in adolescent oncology patients (12-19 years old) and caregivers through ad hoc surveys. The responses of the study group of patients and caregivers treated in Adolescent Units were compared with the group not treated in them.

RESULTS

It is noted that many respondents consider that they have not been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant differences were seen in communication, with better perception by the group of patients treated in ACU (87.1%) and caregivers of ACU (97.3%) compared to patients and caregivers of NACU (53.3% and 68.2% respectively). Regarding information received about the side effects, a better perception was observed among patients treated in the ACU than in the NACU (p=0.247). In the transmission of information and the possibility of fertility preservation, a significant difference was observed in favour of ACU in patients and direct caregivers (p=0.010 and p=0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

ACU represents an improvement in the quality perceived by patients and main caregiver on key points in the comprehensive care of the adolescent with cancer such as information, participation in the process and decision making, approach to side effects, psychological care and help in returning to normal life. However, fertility and strategies for talking about the cancer experience, were identified as areas for future improvement.

Peer2Me - evaluation of a peer supported program for adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients: study protocol of a randomised trial using a comprehensive cohort design

BACKGROUND

Developing cancer in young adulthood is a non-normative life event and associated with adverse physical, social and psychological consequences. High psychological distress is common in AYA cancer patients including anxiety, depression or fear of recurrence. At the same time, it is well known that AYA often report unmet needs for support, particularly in terms of informational exchange and emotional support from peers in order to benefit from shared experiences and enhance self-efficacy. Especially in the AYA group, interactions with other same-aged cancer patients may represent an essential resource in terms of coping with the disease, as family members and friends are often overwhelmed and struggling with helplessness. Currently, there is a lack of professional support services using peer support (e.g. psycho-oncological support, aftercare consultations, social legal counselling) or evaluated peer support interventions in Germany. Our aim is to assess the effectiveness of the Peer2Me intervention for AYAs, in which acute patients (mentees) are accompanied by an AYA survivor (mentor) over a period of three months.

METHODS

A prospective Comprehensive Cohort Design with repeated measures will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of Peer2Me for AYA. A sample of 180 patients in active cancer treatment aged 18 to 39 years will be enrolled and randomized to the intervention or control condition (a single AYA-specific consultation). Following mentor training, mentees and mentors are matched by diagnosis, age, and gender. The primary outcome is self-efficacy; secondary outcomes include measures of anxiety, depression, health literacy, life satisfaction and social support life. Outcomes will be measured at baseline before the intervention (t1), immediately after completion of the three-month intervention (t2) and three months after completion the intervention (t3). For the final analyses, we will use an intention-to-treat approach (ITT) and compare patients in the assigned treatment groups.

DISCUSSION

Peer2Me might be an important addition to existing professional psychosocial support services for young cancer patients. At the end of the study, a psycho-oncological intervention for young cancer patients undergoing acute treatment should be available, from which both mentors and mentees could benefit. The long-term continuity of Peer2Me should be ensured through collaboration with different partners.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was retrospectively registered on February 4, 2022 at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05336318).

Psychometric properties of the Turkish Version General Self-Efficacy Scale in children and adolescents with cancer

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in children and adolescents aged 8-18 undergoing cancer treatment.

METHODS

The sample of this methodological and descriptive study consisted of 128 children and adolescents between the ages of 8 and 18 in the pediatric hematology-oncology wards and outpatient units of a university hospital. The study was implemented in a university hospital in Turkey between March 2023 and November 2023. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews with children and adolescents attending the clinic or outpatient clinic. Data were collected using the information form and General Self-Efficacy Scale psychometric tests, Cronbach's alpha, Test-retest, validity and reliability analysis). Item-total score correlation was used.

RESULTS

In the exploratory factor analysis, Kaiser Meyer Olkin was p 0.77, for which Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (p < 0.001). Exploratory factor analysis revealed a ten-item unidimensional structure with satisfactory representation. Item-total score correlations of the scale ranged between 0.32 and 0.52. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the model fit indices of this scale were obtained as follows: χ2/sd = 1.36, Goodness-of-Fit Index = 0.94, Comparative Fit Index = 0.92, Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index = 0.90, and Cronbach alpha value, indicating the internal consistency of the entire scale, was 0.76.

CONCLUSIONS

The scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing self-efficacy in children and adolescents between the ages of eight and eighteen undergoing cancer treatment.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The study will provide precious information for experimental interventions and follow-up studies to assess the self-efficacy of children and adolescents with cancer.