SARS-CoV-2 isolation from an appendix

The Severity of Appendicitis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Institution Experience

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic led to nationwide stay at home orders, leading to delays in medical care. We sought to identify if the severity of appendicitis changed during the pandemic due to these delays and if there were differences in appendicitis severity in patients with simultaneous COVID-19 infection. We hypothesized that pandemic-related restrictions led to more severe cases of appendicitis.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study (4/2018-4/2022) of all patients ≥ 5y with appendicitis. Patients with a malignant appendiceal specimen were excluded. Clinical outcomes and characteristics were compared in those with appendicitis prior to the COVID-19 (PC) era to those in the COVID-19 (C) era, as well as between COVID-19 positive (C+) and negative (C-) individuals. Univariate analyses were conducted. A P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.ResultsA total of 1665 patients met inclusion criteria, 806 (48.4%) in PC era, and 859 (51.6%) in C era. Age and gender did not differ from PC era to C era, nor did they differ from the C- group to the C+ group. The C era had significantly higher 30-day readmissions than the PC era (C 6.29% (n = 54) v. PC 2.73% (n = 22), P = 0.001). The C era also had more greater than 30-day readmissions than the PC era (C 3.26% (n = 28) v. PC 1.74% (n = 14), P = 0.048). There was no significant difference in the reason for 30-day or greater than 30-day readmissions for the PC vs C eras. Of the C era, 833 (97.0%) were C- and 26 (3.0%) were C+. Rates of nonoperative management at index admission were not different between groups. The white blood cell (WBC) count was significantly lower in C+, 11.9 (8.55-13.35 IQR), vs C- group, 12.85 (9.9-15.3 IQR), P = 0.0336. There was no significant difference in the severity of appendicitis nor readmission status in C+ vs C- groups during the C era.ConclusionOur data indicates that the PC era had more severe cases of appendicitis as shown by higher rates of perforated and gangrenous appendicitis on pathology reports compared to the C era. Interestingly, readmissions were more prevalent in the C era as opposed to the PC era, which coincided with an increase in complications requiring readmission following laparoscopic appendectomies. In evaluating appendicitis patients according to COVID-19 status, we saw no significant differences in the severity of appendicitis in C- and C+ individuals.

Features of Appendix and the Characteristics of Appendicitis Development in Children with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Research on the subject of the influence of SARS-CoV-2 mechanisms on human homeostasis remains an actual problem. Particular interest is the study of pathomorphological changes in the appendix in children with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

Aim of this study: morphological and molecular biological evaluation of the appendix in children of different age groups with COVID-19.

METHODS

Groups were formed on the basis of anamnestic, clinical, and morphological data: I (n = 42; aged 2 to 18 years, average age-10.8 ± 4.79)-with an established clinical diagnosis: coronavirus infection (COVID-19; PCR+); II (n = 55; aged 2 to 18 years, average age-9.7 ± 4.77)-with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis; collected before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2017-2019; and III (n = 38; aged 2 to 18 years, average age-10.3 ± 4.62)-the control group. Histological and immunohistochemical studies were conducted using primary antibodies to CD3, CD4, CD68, CD163, CD20, and CD138 and to pro-inflammatory (IL-1, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4, IL-10) cytokines.

RESULTS

In most samples of appendixes in children with COVID-19, signs of destructive phlegmonous-ulcerative and gangrenous appendicitis were discovered. An increase in CD3+, CD4+, CD68+, CD163+, and CD20+ CD138+ immunocompetent cells was found in the appendix of children with COVID-19. As well, there was an increase in pro-inflammatory (IL-1, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4, IL-10) cytokines.

CONCLUSIONS

The aforementioned pathological and immunohistochemical changes were more pronounced in the group of children aged 6-12 years (childhood).

Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in abdominal tissues and biologic fluids during abdominal surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Viral transmission to healthcare providers during surgical procedures was a major concern at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The presence of the severe acute respiratory disease syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, in the abdominal cavity as well as in other abdominal tissues which surgeons are exposed has been investigated in several studies. The aim of the present systematic review was to analyze if the virus can be identify in the abdominal cavity.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to identify relevant studies regarding the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in abdominal tissues or fluids. Number of patients included as well as patient's characteristics, type of procedures, samples and number of positive samples were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies were included (18 case series and 18 case reports). There were 357 samples for detection of SARS-CoV-2, obtained from 295 individuals. A total of 21 samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (5.9%). Positive samples were more frequently encountered in patients with severe COVID-19 (37.5% vs 3.8%, p < 0.001). No health-care provider related infections were reported.

CONCLUSION

Although a rare occurrence, SARS-CoV-2 can be found in the abdominal tissues and fluids. It seems that the presence of the virus in the abdominal tissues or fluids is more likely in patients with severe disease. Protective measures should be employed in the operating room to protect the staff when operating patients with COVID-19.

COVID19 detection in appendix of acute appendicitis in a child: a case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal symptoms are one of the most common presentations of Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), even in children. Higher rates of complicated appendicitis have been demonstrated in the era of the COVID-19 outbreak, and it has been recently suggested that acute appendicitis may occur as a complication of COVID-19. However, the relationship between appendicitis and COVID-19 remains unclear.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 7-year-old male presented to the pediatric emergency department with 2 days' history of lower abdominal discomfort and tenderness. On examination, his abdomen was distended with diffuse mild tenderness at the lower abdomen, which was aggravated by movement. He was also tested and was found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2. Computed tomography showed perforated appendicitis with a fecalith. The patient was admitted and laparoscopic appendectomy was successfully performed. Postoperatively, a minor intra-abdominal abscess was present, which successfully treated with antibiotics. Histopathology showed a markedly inflamed appendix with mucosal ulceration and transmural neutrophilic inflammation, which was consistent with phlegmonous appendicitis. Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction using a surgically extracted appendix specimen revealed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus, which indicated a pathophysiological relationship between appendicitis and COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

The present case will provide further understanding of pediatric patients with concomitant COVID-19 and acute appendicitis.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 Alpha variant (B.1.1.7), original wild-type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and cytomegalovirus co-infection in a young adult with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, case report, and review of the possible cytomegalovirus reactivation mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Like other viral infections, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection could affect different human body systems, including host immune responses. Three years after its pandemic, we learn more about this novel coronavirus. As we expected, different co-infections with various organisms, such as viruses, bacteria, and even fungi, have been reported. However, concurrent infection with two severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 strains and cytomegalovirus is extremely unusual. We have only a rudimentary understanding of such co-infections and their long-term consequences for patients with cancer.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 18-year-old young Iranian adult with acute lymphoblastic leukemia presented with abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting following a recent history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. The patient never experienced respiratory symptoms, and the chest imaging study was normal on admission. His primary laboratory investigation revealed prerenal azotemia and severe abnormal liver function tests (blood urea nitrogen 32 mg/dL, creatinine 1.75 mg/dL, prothrombin time 66 s, partial thromboplastin time 44.5 s, international normalized ratio 5.14, total bilirubin 2.9 mg/dL, and direct bilirubin 2.59 mg/dL). Cytomegalovirus disease was diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction in his blood and stool samples. The patient's gastrointestinal signs and symptoms improved shortly after receiving intravenous ganciclovir treatment. His gastrointestinal symptoms continued intermittently for weeks despite maintenance valganciclovir prescription, necessitating frequent hospitalizations. The patient was complicated by the recurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms during the sixth hospitalization, even though he had no respiratory symptoms, and the nasopharyngeal test revealed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 Wuhan strain for the first time. Remdesivir and valganciclovir were administrated due to persistent enteritis and evidence of intestinal tissue invasion by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and cytomegalovirus on multiple intestinal biopsies, which led to partial clinical responses. Cytomegalovirus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 fecal shedding continued for more than 6 months despite repeated antiviral therapy, and the Wuhan and Alpha strains were also detected in his nasopharyngeal samples through repeated sampling (confirmed by four nasopharyngeal sampling and multiple stool specimens and several intestinal biopsies). Finally, during the Delta-variant (B.1.617.2) outbreak in Iran, the patient was admitted again with febrile neutropenia and decreased level of consciousness, necessitating respiratory support and mechanical ventilation. During the Delta-variant peak, the patient's nasopharyngeal sample once more tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The patient died a few days later from cardiopulmonary arrest.

CONCLUSION

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has encountered patients with cancer with critical diagnostic and treatment challenges. Patients who are immunocompromised may co-infect with multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 strains and cytomegalovirus, and even with timely diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis may be poor.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Is Not Associated With Pediatric Appendicitis

Although case reports have suggested an association between severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 and appendicitis, we found that the overall incidence of appendicitis was stable throughout the pandemic at our tertiary pediatric hospital. Furthermore, we did not find evidence of CoV2 infection in 9 appendicitis tissues. Therefore, we conclude that severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 infection of the appendix is not a common etiologic cause of pediatric appendicitis.

Swab test in biological fluids as predictor of COVID-19 transmission risk during surgery: a prospective cross-sectional study from an Italian COVID center

BACKGROUND

The contamination of body fluids by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 during surgery is current matter of debate in the scientific literature concerning CoronaVIrus Disease 2019. Surgical guidelines were published during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and recommended to avoid laparoscopic surgery as much as possible, in fear that the chimney effect of high flow intraperitoneal gas escape during, and after, the procedure would increase the risk of viral transmission.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during surgery by searching for viral RNA in serial samplings of biological liquids.

METHODS

This is a single center prospective cross-sectional study. We used a real-time reverse transcriptase (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to perform swab tests for the qualitative detection of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2 in abdominal fluids, during emergency surgery and on the first post-operative day. In the case of thoracic surgery, we performed a swab test of pleural fluids during chest drainage placement as well as on the first post-operative day.

RESULTS

A total of 20 samples were obtained: 5 from pleural fluids, 13 from peritoneal fluids and two from biliary fluid. All 20 swabs performed from biological fluids resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection.

CONCLUSION

To date, there is no scientific evidence of possible contagion by laparoscopic aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2, neither is certain whether the virus is effectively present in biological fluids.

Acute appendicitis-advances and controversies

Being one of the most common causes of the acute abdomen, acute appendicitis (AA) forms the bread and butter of any general surgeon's practice. With the recent advancements in AA's management, much controversy in diagnostic algorithms, possible differential diagnoses, and weighing the management options has been generated, with no absolute consensus in the literature. Since Alvarado described his eponymous clinical scoring system in 1986 to stratify AA risk, there has been a burgeoning of additional scores for guiding downstream management and mortality assessment. Furthermore, advancing literature on the role of antibiotics, variations in appendicectomy, and its adjuncts have expanded the surgeon's repertoire of management options. Owing to the varied presentation, diagnostic tools, and management of AA have also been proposed in special groups such as pregnant patients, the elderly, and the immunocompromised. This article seeks to raise the critical debates about what is currently known about the above aspects of AA and explore the latest controversies in the field. Considering the ever-evolving coronavirus disease 2019 situation worldwide, we also discuss the pandemic's repercussions on patients and how surgeons' practices have evolved in the context of AA.

Vascular thrombosis and vasculitis in the gastrointestinal tract are associated with poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19

AIM

To report pathologic findings in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

we evaluated clinical and GI tract histologic findings in six COVID-19 patients that presented with GI symptoms like diarrhea, and abdominal pain. This study includes surgical resection specimens from five patients and two sets of biopsy specimens from one patient.

RESULTS

Idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease was considered in three of six cases based on clinical, radiologic, and endoscopic presentation. Histologically, the enteric mucosa had a spectrum of histologic changes, including active enteritis, chronic active enteritis, and transmural necrosis. Extensive thrombi in vessels and/or vasculitis were identified in three out of the six cases. The presence of extensive vascular thrombi is associated with poor prognosis, and the three patients deceased in a short period of time (ranges from 7-67 days, median 14 days) after admission for GI symptoms. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) RNA was detected in bowel tissue of one case. The other three patients recovered and were discharged and free of GI symptoms (follow-up period ranges from 235 days to 270 days, median 237 days).

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 associated enteritis may mimic Crohn's disease clinically, radiologically and endoscopically, and these two entities can be differentiated by pathologic findings. COVID-19 patients with GI symptoms may warrant a workup to evaluate for pathologic changes, as the presence of vasculitis and microthrombi may predict poor clinical outcome.

SARS-CoV-2-associated gastrointestinal and liver diseases: what is known and what is needed to explore

BACKGROUND

The pandemic of COVID19 which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first described in China as an unexplained pneumonia transmitted by respiratory droplets. Gastrointestinal (GI) and liver injury associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported as an early or sole disease manifestation, mainly outside China. The exact mechanism and incidence of GI and liver involvement are not well elucidated.

MAIN BODY

We conducted a PubMed search for all articles written in the English language about SARS-CoV-2 affecting the GI and liver. Following data extraction, 590 articles were selected. In addition to respiratory droplets, SARS-CoV-2 may reach the GI system through the fecal-oral route, saliva, and swallowing of nasopharyngeal fluids, while breastmilk and blood transmission were not implicated. Moreover, GI infection may act as a septic focus for viral persistence and transmission to the liver, appendix, and brain. In addition to the direct viral cytopathic effect, the mechanism of injury is multifactorial and is related to genetic and demographic variations. The most frequently reported GI symptoms are diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and bleeding. However, liver infection is generally discovered during laboratory testing or a post-mortem. Radiological imaging is the gold standard in diagnosing COVID-19 patients and contributes to understanding the mechanism of extra-thoracic involvement. Medications should be prescribed with caution, especially in chronic GI and liver patients.

CONCLUSION

GI manifestations are common in COVID-19 patients. Special care should be paid for high-risk patients, older males, and those with background liver disease.

Laparoscopic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: detection of SARS-COV-2 in abdominal tissues, fluids, and surgical smoke

Background

There are still concerns over the safety of laparoscopic surgery in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients due to the potential risk of viral transmission through surgical smoke/laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of currently available literature to determine the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) in abdominal tissues or fluids and in surgical smoke.

Results

A total of 19 studies (15 case reports and 4 case series) comprising 29 COVID-19 patients were included. The viral RNA was positively identified in 11 patients (37.9%). The samples that tested positive include the peritoneal fluid, bile, ascitic fluid, peritoneal dialysate, duodenal wall, and appendix. Similar samples, together with the omentum and abdominal subcutaneous fat, tested negative in the other patients. Only one study investigated SARS-COV-2 RNA in surgical smoke generated during laparoscopy, reporting negative findings.

Conclusions

There are conflicting results regarding the presence of SARS-COV-2 in abdominal tissues and fluids. No currently available evidence supports the hypothesis that SARS-COV-2 can be aerosolized and transmitted through surgical smoke. Larger studies are urgently needed to corroborate these findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-021-02142-8.