1
|
Galbraith JD, Kortschak RD, Suh A, Adelson DL. Genome Stability Is in the Eye of the Beholder: CR1 Retrotransposon Activity Varies Significantly across Avian Diversity. Genome Biol Evol 2021; 13:6433158. [PMID: 34894225 PMCID: PMC8665684 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evab259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the sequencing of the zebra finch genome it has become clear that avian genomes, while largely stable in terms of chromosome number and gene synteny, are more dynamic at an intrachromosomal level. A multitude of intrachromosomal rearrangements and significant variation in transposable element (TE) content have been noted across the avian tree. TEs are a source of genome plasticity, because their high similarity enables chromosomal rearrangements through nonallelic homologous recombination, and they have potential for exaptation as regulatory and coding sequences. Previous studies have investigated the activity of the dominant TE in birds, chicken repeat 1 (CR1) retrotransposons, either focusing on their expansion within single orders, or comparing passerines with nonpasserines. Here, we comprehensively investigate and compare the activity of CR1 expansion across orders of birds, finding levels of CR1 activity vary significantly both between and within orders. We describe high levels of TE expansion in genera which have speciated in the last 10 Myr including kiwis, geese, and Amazon parrots; low levels of TE expansion in songbirds across their diversification, and near inactivity of TEs in the cassowary and emu for millions of years. CR1s have remained active over long periods of time across most orders of neognaths, with activity at any one time dominated by one or two families of CR1s. Our findings of higher TE activity in species-rich clades and dominant families of TEs within lineages mirror past findings in mammals and indicate that genome evolution in amniotes relies on universal TE-driven processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D Galbraith
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Alexander Suh
- School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.,Department of Organismal Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC), Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - David L Adelson
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suh A, Bachg S, Donnellan S, Joseph L, Brosius J, Kriegs JO, Schmitz J. De-novo emergence of SINE retroposons during the early evolution of passerine birds. Mob DNA 2017; 8:21. [PMID: 29255493 PMCID: PMC5729268 DOI: 10.1186/s13100-017-0104-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Passeriformes ("perching birds" or passerines) make up more than half of all extant bird species. The genome of the zebra finch, a passerine model organism for vocal learning, was noted previously to contain thousands of short interspersed elements (SINEs), a group of retroposons that is abundant in mammalian genomes but considered largely inactive in avian genomes. RESULTS Here we resolve the deep phylogenetic relationships of passerines using presence/absence patterns of SINEs. The resultant retroposon-based phylogeny provides a powerful and independent corroboration of previous sequence-based analyses. Notably, SINE activity began in the common ancestor of Eupasseres (passerines excluding the New Zealand wrens Acanthisittidae) and ceased before the rapid diversification of oscine passerines (suborder Passeri - songbirds). Furthermore, we find evidence for very recent SINE activity within suboscine passerines (suborder Tyranni), following the emergence of a SINE via acquisition of a different tRNA head as we suggest through template switching. CONCLUSIONS We propose that the early evolution of passerines was unusual among birds in that it was accompanied by de-novo emergence and activity of SINEs. Their genomic and transcriptomic impact warrants further study in the light of the massive diversification of passerines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Suh
- Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany
- Department of Evolutionary Biology (EBC), Uppsala University, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sandra Bachg
- Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Stephen Donnellan
- South Australian Museum, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 Australia
| | - Leo Joseph
- Australian National Wildlife Collection, CSIRO National Research Collections Australia, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia
| | - Jürgen Brosius
- Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany
- Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), D-16816 Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Jan Ole Kriegs
- Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany
- LWL-Museum für Naturkunde, Westfälisches Landesmuseum mit Planetarium, D-48161 Münster, Germany
| | - Jürgen Schmitz
- Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Suh A, Smeds L, Ellegren H. Abundant recent activity of retrovirus-like retrotransposons within and among flycatcher species implies a rich source of structural variation in songbird genomes. Mol Ecol 2017; 27:99-111. [DOI: 10.1111/mec.14439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Suh
- Department of Evolutionary Biology; Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC); Uppsala University; Uppsala Sweden
| | - Linnéa Smeds
- Department of Evolutionary Biology; Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC); Uppsala University; Uppsala Sweden
| | - Hans Ellegren
- Department of Evolutionary Biology; Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC); Uppsala University; Uppsala Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lammers F, Gallus S, Janke A, Nilsson MA. Phylogenetic Conflict in Bears Identified by Automated Discovery of Transposable Element Insertions in Low-Coverage Genomes. Genome Biol Evol 2017; 9:2862-2878. [PMID: 28985298 PMCID: PMC5737362 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Phylogenetic reconstruction from transposable elements (TEs) offers an additional perspective to study evolutionary processes. However, detecting phylogenetically informative TE insertions requires tedious experimental work, limiting the power of phylogenetic inference. Here, we analyzed the genomes of seven bear species using high-throughput sequencing data to detect thousands of TE insertions. The newly developed pipeline for TE detection called TeddyPi (TE detection and discovery for Phylogenetic Inference) identified 150,513 high-quality TE insertions in the genomes of ursine and tremarctine bears. By integrating different TE insertion callers and using a stringent filtering approach, the TeddyPi pipeline produced highly reliable TE insertion calls, which were confirmed by extensive in vitro validation experiments. Analysis of single nucleotide substitutions in the flanking regions of the TEs shows that these substitutions correlate with the phylogenetic signal from the TE insertions. Our phylogenomic analyses show that TEs are a major driver of genomic variation in bears and enabled phylogenetic reconstruction of a well-resolved species tree, despite strong signals for incomplete lineage sorting and introgression. The analyses show that the Asiatic black, sun, and sloth bear form a monophyletic clade, in which phylogenetic incongruence originates from incomplete lineage sorting. TeddyPi is open source and can be adapted to various TE and structural variation callers. The pipeline makes it possible to confidently extract thousands of TE insertions even from low-coverage genomes (∼10×) of nonmodel organisms. This opens new possibilities for biologists to study phylogenies and evolutionary processes as well as rates and patterns of (retro-)transposition and structural variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fritjof Lammers
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Institute for Ecology, Evolution & Diversity, Biologicum, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Susanne Gallus
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Axel Janke
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Institute for Ecology, Evolution & Diversity, Biologicum, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Maria A. Nilsson
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gao B, Wang S, Wang Y, Shen D, Xue S, Chen C, Cui H, Song C. Low diversity, activity, and density of transposable elements in five avian genomes. Funct Integr Genomics 2017; 17:427-439. [PMID: 28190211 PMCID: PMC5486457 DOI: 10.1007/s10142-017-0545-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2016] [Revised: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we conducted the activity, diversity, and density analysis of transposable elements (TEs) across five avian genomes (budgerigar, chicken, turkey, medium ground finch, and zebra finch) to explore the potential reason of small genome sizes of birds. We found that these avian genomes exhibited low density of TEs by about 10% of genome coverages and low diversity of TEs with the TE landscapes dominated by CR1 and ERV elements, and contrasting proliferation dynamics both between TE types and between species were observed across the five avian genomes. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that CR1 clade was more diverse in the family structure compared with R2 clade in birds; avian ERVs were classified into four clades (alpha, beta, gamma, and ERV-L) and belonged to three classes of ERV with an uneven distributed in these lineages. The activities of DNA and SINE TEs were very low in the evolution history of avian genomes; most LINEs and LTRs were ancient copies with a substantial decrease of activity in recent, with only LTRs and LINEs in chicken and zebra finch exhibiting weak activity in very recent, and very few TEs were intact; however, the recent activity may be underestimated due to the sequencing/assembly technologies in some species. Overall, this study demonstrates low diversity, activity, and density of TEs in the five avian species; highlights the differences of TEs in these lineages; and suggests that the current and recent activity of TEs in avian genomes is very limited, which may be one of the reasons of small genome sizes in birds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Gao
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-product Safety, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, 48 Wenhui East Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China
| | - Saisai Wang
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-product Safety, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, 48 Wenhui East Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China
| | - Yali Wang
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-product Safety, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, 48 Wenhui East Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China
| | - Dan Shen
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-product Safety, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, 48 Wenhui East Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China
| | - Songlei Xue
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-product Safety, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, 48 Wenhui East Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China
| | - Cai Chen
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-product Safety, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, 48 Wenhui East Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China
| | - Hengmi Cui
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-product Safety, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, 48 Wenhui East Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China
| | - Chengyi Song
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-product Safety, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, 48 Wenhui East Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sotero-Caio CG, Platt RN, Suh A, Ray DA. Evolution and Diversity of Transposable Elements in Vertebrate Genomes. Genome Biol Evol 2017; 9:161-177. [PMID: 28158585 PMCID: PMC5381603 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evw264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) are selfish genetic elements that mobilize in genomes via transposition or retrotransposition and often make up large fractions of vertebrate genomes. Here, we review the current understanding of vertebrate TE diversity and evolution in the context of recent advances in genome sequencing and assembly techniques. TEs make up 4-60% of assembled vertebrate genomes, and deeply branching lineages such as ray-finned fishes and amphibians generally exhibit a higher TE diversity than the more recent radiations of birds and mammals. Furthermore, the list of taxa with exceptional TE landscapes is growing. We emphasize that the current bottleneck in genome analyses lies in the proper annotation of TEs and provide examples where superficial analyses led to misleading conclusions about genome evolution. Finally, recent advances in long-read sequencing will soon permit access to TE-rich genomic regions that previously resisted assembly including the gigantic, TE-rich genomes of salamanders and lungfishes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roy N. Platt
- Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
| | - Alexander Suh
- Department of Evolutionary Biology (EBC), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - David A. Ray
- Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kapusta A, Suh A. Evolution of bird genomes-a transposon's-eye view. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2016; 1389:164-185. [DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2015] [Revised: 10/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Kapusta
- Department of Human Genetics; University of Utah School of Medicine; Salt Lake City Utah
| | - Alexander Suh
- Department of Evolutionary Biology (EBC); Uppsala University; Uppsala Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Suh A. The phylogenomic forest of bird trees contains a hard polytomy at the root of Neoaves. ZOOL SCR 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Suh
- Department of Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC) Uppsala University SE ‐ 752 36 Uppsala Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cui Y, Yan C, Sun T, Li J, Yue B, Zhang X, Li J. Identification of CR1 retroposons in Arborophila rufipectus and their application to Phasianidae phylogeny. Mol Ecol Resour 2016; 16:1037-49. [PMID: 26929266 DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2015] [Revised: 01/26/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Chicken repeat 1 (CR1), a member of non-LTR retroposon, is an important phylogenetic marker in avian systematics. In this study, we reported several characteristics of CR1 elements in a draft genome of Arborophila rufipectus (Sichuan partridge). According to the analyses of RepeatMasker, approximately 254 966 CR1 elements were identified in A. rufipectus, covering 6.7% of the genome. Subsequently, we selected eighteen novel CR1 elements by comparing the chicken genome, turkey genome and assembled A. rufipectus scaffolds. Here, a combined data set comprising of 22 CR1 loci, mitochondrial genomes and eight unlinked introns was analysed to infer the evolutionary relationships of twelve Phasianidae species. The applicability of CR1 sequences for inferring avian phylogeny relative to mtDNA and intron sequences was investigated as well. Our results elucidated the position of A. rufipectus in Phasianidae with robust supports that it presented a sister clade to Arborophila ardens/Arborophila brunneopectus, and implied that genus Arborophila was in a basal phylogenetic position within Phasianidae and a phylogenetic affinity between Meleagris gallopavo and Pucrasia macrolopha. Therefore, this work not only resolved some of the confounding relationships among Phasianidae, but also suggested CR1 sequences could provide powerful complementary data for phylogeny reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaoyao Cui
- Key Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China.,Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610064, China
| | - Chaochao Yan
- Key Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China.,Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610064, China
| | - Tianlin Sun
- Key Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China.,Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610064, China
| | - Jing Li
- Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610064, China
| | - Bisong Yue
- Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610064, China
| | - Xiuyue Zhang
- Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610064, China
| | - Jing Li
- Key Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China.,Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610064, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kuramoto T, Nishihara H, Watanabe M, Okada N. Determining the Position of Storks on the Phylogenetic Tree of Waterbirds by Retroposon Insertion Analysis. Genome Biol Evol 2015; 7:3180-9. [PMID: 26527652 PMCID: PMC4700946 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evv213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite many studies on avian phylogenetics in recent decades that used morphology, mitochondrial genomes, and/or nuclear genes, the phylogenetic positions of several birds (e.g., storks) remain unsettled. In addition to the aforementioned approaches, analysis of retroposon insertions, which are nearly homoplasy-free phylogenetic markers, has also been used in avian phylogenetics. However, the first step in the analysis of retroposon insertions, that is, isolation of retroposons from genomic libraries, is a costly and time-consuming procedure. Therefore, we developed a high-throughput and cost-effective protocol to collect retroposon insertion information based on next-generation sequencing technology, which we call here the STRONG (Screening of Transposons Obtained by Next Generation Sequencing) method, and applied it to 3 waterbird species, for which we identified 35,470 loci containing chicken repeat 1 retroposons (CR1). Our analysis of the presence/absence of 30 CR1 insertions demonstrated the intra- and interordinal phylogenetic relationships in the waterbird assemblage, namely 1) Loons diverged first among the waterbirds, 2) penguins (Sphenisciformes) and petrels (Procellariiformes) diverged next, and 3) among the remaining families of waterbirds traditionally classified in Ciconiiformes/Pelecaniformes, storks (Ciconiidae) diverged first. Furthermore, our genome-scale, in silico retroposon analysis based on published genome data uncovered a complex divergence history among pelican, heron, and ibis lineages, presumably involving ancient interspecies hybridization between the heron and ibis lineages. Thus, our retroposon-based waterbird phylogeny and the established phylogenetic position of storks will help to understand the evolutionary processes of aquatic adaptation and related morphological convergent evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Kuramoto
- Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hidenori Nishihara
- Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Maiko Watanabe
- Division of Microbiology, National Institute of Health Sciences, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norihiro Okada
- Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan Foundation for Advancement of International Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan Department of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Doronina L, Churakov G, Shi J, Brosius J, Baertsch R, Clawson H, Schmitz J. Exploring Massive Incomplete Lineage Sorting in Arctoids (Laurasiatheria, Carnivora). Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:3194-204. [PMID: 26337548 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msv188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Freed from the competition of large raptors, Paleocene carnivores could expand their newly acquired habitats in search of prey. Such changing conditions might have led to their successful distribution and rapid radiation. Today, molecular evolutionary biologists are faced, however, with the consequences of such accelerated adaptive radiations, because they led to sequential speciation more rapidly than phylogenetic markers could be fixed. The repercussions being that current genealogies based on such markers are incongruent with species trees.Our aim was to explore such conflicting phylogenetic zones of evolution during the early arctoid radiation, especially to distinguish diagnostic from misleading phylogenetic signals, and to examine other carnivore-related speciation events. We applied a combination of high-throughput computational strategies to screen carnivore and related genomes in silico for randomly inserted retroposed elements that we then used to identify inconsistent phylogenetic patterns in the Arctoidea group, which is well known for phylogenetic discordances.Our combined retrophylogenomic and in vitro wet lab approach detected hundreds of carnivore-specific insertions, many of them confirming well-established splits or identifying and solving conflicting species distributions. Our systematic genome-wide screens for Long INterspersed Elements detected homoplasy-free markers with insertion-specific truncation points that we used to distinguish phylogenetically informative markers from conflicting signals. The results were independently confirmed by phylogenetic diagnostic Short INterspersed Elements. As statistical analysis ruled out ancestral hybridization, these doubly verified but still conflicting patterns were statistically determined to be genomic remnants from a time of ancestral incomplete lineage sorting that especially accompanied large parts of Arctoidea evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliya Doronina
- Institute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Gennady Churakov
- Institute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster, Münster, Germany Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Jingjing Shi
- Institute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Jürgen Brosius
- Institute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster, Münster, Germany Institute of Evolutionary and Medical Genomics, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Robert Baertsch
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz
| | - Hiram Clawson
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz
| | - Jürgen Schmitz
- Institute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Suh A, Smeds L, Ellegren H. The Dynamics of Incomplete Lineage Sorting across the Ancient Adaptive Radiation of Neoavian Birds. PLoS Biol 2015; 13:e1002224. [PMID: 26284513 PMCID: PMC4540587 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 170] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2015] [Accepted: 07/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The diversification of neoavian birds is one of the most rapid adaptive radiations of extant organisms. Recent whole-genome sequence analyses have much improved the resolution of the neoavian radiation and suggest concurrence with the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary, yet the causes of the remaining genome-level irresolvabilities appear unclear. Here we show that genome-level analyses of 2,118 retrotransposon presence/absence markers converge at a largely consistent Neoaves phylogeny and detect a highly differential temporal prevalence of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), i.e., the persistence of ancestral genetic variation as polymorphisms during speciation events. We found that ILS-derived incongruences are spread over the genome and involve 35% and 34% of the analyzed loci on the autosomes and the Z chromosome, respectively. Surprisingly, Neoaves diversification comprises three adaptive radiations, an initial near-K-Pg super-radiation with highly discordant phylogenetic signals from near-simultaneous speciation events, followed by two post-K-Pg radiations of core landbirds and core waterbirds with much less pronounced ILS. We provide evidence that, given the extreme level of up to 100% ILS per branch in super-radiations, particularly rapid speciation events may neither resemble a fully bifurcating tree nor are they resolvable as such. As a consequence, their complex demographic history is more accurately represented as local networks within a species tree. A study of ancient genetic variation reveals genomic evidence for near-simultaneous speciation at the base of Neoaves (a group containing most modern birds), which temporally coincides with the mass extinction of nonavian dinosaurs and archaic birds. The rise of modern birds began after the mass extinction of nonavian dinosaurs and archaic birds at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary, about 66 million years ago. This coincides with the super-rapid adaptive radiation of Neoaves (a group that contains most modern birds), which has been difficult to resolve even with whole genome sequences. We reconstructed the genealogical fates of thousands of rare genomic changes (insertions of selfish mobile elements called retrotransposons), a third of which were found to be affected by a phenomenon known as incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), namely a persistence of polymorphisms across multiple successive speciation events. Astoundingly, we found that near the K-Pg boundary, speciation events were accompanied by extreme levels of ILS, suggesting a near-simultaneous, star-like diversification process that appears plausible in the context of instantaneous niche availability that must have followed the K-Pg mass extinction. Our genome-scale results provide a population genomic explanation as to why some species radiations may be more complex than a fully bifurcating tree of life. We suggest that, under such circumstances, ILS bears witness to the biological limitation of phylogenetic resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Suh
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| | - Linnéa Smeds
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hans Ellegren
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Suh A. The Specific Requirements for CR1 Retrotransposition Explain the Scarcity of Retrogenes in Birds. J Mol Evol 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s00239-015-9692-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
14
|
Platt RN, Zhang Y, Witherspoon DJ, Xing J, Suh A, Keith MS, Jorde LB, Stevens RD, Ray DA. Targeted Capture of Phylogenetically Informative Ves SINE Insertions in Genus Myotis. Genome Biol Evol 2015; 7:1664-75. [PMID: 26014613 PMCID: PMC4494050 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evv099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Identification of retrotransposon insertions in nonmodel taxa can be technically challenging and costly. This has inhibited progress in understanding retrotransposon insertion dynamics outside of a few well-studied species. To address this problem, we have extended a retrotransposon-based capture and sequence method (ME-Scan [mobile element scanning]) to identify insertions belonging to the Ves family of short interspersed elements (SINEs) across seven species of the bat genus Myotis. We identified between 120,000 and 143,000 SINE insertions in six taxa lacking a draft genome by comparing to the M. lucifugus reference genome. On average, each Ves insertion was sequenced to 129.6 × coverage. When mapped back to the M. lucifugus reference genome, all insertions were confidently assigned within a 10-bp window. Polymorphic Ves insertions were identified in each taxon based on their mapped locations. Using cross-species comparisons and the identified insertion positions, a presence–absence matrix was created for approximately 796,000 insertions. Dollo parsimony analysis of more than 85,000 phylogenetically informative insertions recovered strongly supported, monophyletic clades that correspond with the biogeography of each taxa. This phylogeny is similar to previously published mitochondrial phylogenies, with the exception of the placement of M. vivesi. These results support the utility of our variation on ME-Scan to identify polymorphic retrotransposon insertions in taxa without a reference genome and for large-scale retrotransposon-based phylogenetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy N Platt
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University
| | - Yuhua Zhang
- Bionomics Research & Technology Center, Environmental and Occupational Health Science Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
| | | | - Jinchuan Xing
- Department of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
| | - Alexander Suh
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Megan S Keith
- Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University
| | - Lynn B Jorde
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center
| | - Richard D Stevens
- Department of Natural Resources Management and the Museum of Texas Tech University
| | - David A Ray
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jarvis ED, Mirarab S, Aberer AJ, Li B, Houde P, Li C, Ho SYW, Faircloth BC, Nabholz B, Howard JT, Suh A, Weber CC, da Fonseca RR, Alfaro-Núñez A, Narula N, Liu L, Burt D, Ellegren H, Edwards SV, Stamatakis A, Mindell DP, Cracraft J, Braun EL, Warnow T, Jun W, Gilbert MTP, Zhang G. Phylogenomic analyses data of the avian phylogenomics project. Gigascience 2015; 4:4. [PMID: 25741440 PMCID: PMC4349222 DOI: 10.1186/s13742-014-0038-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2014] [Accepted: 12/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Determining the evolutionary relationships among the major lineages of extant birds has been one of the biggest challenges in systematic biology. To address this challenge, we assembled or collected the genomes of 48 avian species spanning most orders of birds, including all Neognathae and two of the five Palaeognathae orders. We used these genomes to construct a genome-scale avian phylogenetic tree and perform comparative genomic analyses. FINDINGS Here we present the datasets associated with the phylogenomic analyses, which include sequence alignment files consisting of nucleotides, amino acids, indels, and transposable elements, as well as tree files containing gene trees and species trees. Inferring an accurate phylogeny required generating: 1) A well annotated data set across species based on genome synteny; 2) Alignments with unaligned or incorrectly overaligned sequences filtered out; and 3) Diverse data sets, including genes and their inferred trees, indels, and transposable elements. Our total evidence nucleotide tree (TENT) data set (consisting of exons, introns, and UCEs) gave what we consider our most reliable species tree when using the concatenation-based ExaML algorithm or when using statistical binning with the coalescence-based MP-EST algorithm (which we refer to as MP-EST*). Other data sets, such as the coding sequence of some exons, revealed other properties of genome evolution, namely convergence. CONCLUSIONS The Avian Phylogenomics Project is the largest vertebrate phylogenomics project to date that we are aware of. The sequence, alignment, and tree data are expected to accelerate analyses in phylogenomics and other related areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erich D Jarvis
- Department of Neurobiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 USA
| | - Siavash Mirarab
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
| | - Andre J Aberer
- Scientific Computing Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bo Li
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083 China ; College of Medicine and Forensics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061 China ; Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Houde
- Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
| | - Cai Li
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083 China ; Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simon Y W Ho
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Brant C Faircloth
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA ; Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
| | - Benoit Nabholz
- CNRS UMR 5554, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, Université Montpellier II, Montpellier, France
| | - Jason T Howard
- Department of Neurobiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 USA
| | - Alexander Suh
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Claudia C Weber
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Rute R da Fonseca
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nitish Narula
- Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA ; Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Onna-son, Okinawa, 904-0495 Japan
| | - Liang Liu
- Department of Statistics and Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, 30602 USA
| | - Dave Burt
- Department of Genomics and Genetics, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG UK
| | - Hans Ellegren
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Scott V Edwards
- Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Alexandros Stamatakis
- Scientific Computing Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany ; Institute of Theoretical Informatics, Department of Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D- 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - David P Mindell
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Joel Cracraft
- Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024 USA
| | - Edward L Braun
- Department of Biology and Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
| | - Tandy Warnow
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
| | - Wang Jun
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083 China ; Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark ; Princess Al Jawhara Center of Excellence in the Research of Hereditary Disorders, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia ; Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai long, Taipa, Macau, 999078 China ; Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - M Thomas Pius Gilbert
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark ; Trace and Environmental DNA Laboratory Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102 Australia
| | - Guojie Zhang
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083 China ; Centre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, Universitetsparken 15, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jarvis ED, Mirarab S, Aberer AJ, Li B, Houde P, Li C, Ho SYW, Faircloth BC, Nabholz B, Howard JT, Suh A, Weber CC, da Fonseca RR, Li J, Zhang F, Li H, Zhou L, Narula N, Liu L, Ganapathy G, Boussau B, Bayzid MS, Zavidovych V, Subramanian S, Gabaldón T, Capella-Gutiérrez S, Huerta-Cepas J, Rekepalli B, Munch K, Schierup M, Lindow B, Warren WC, Ray D, Green RE, Bruford MW, Zhan X, Dixon A, Li S, Li N, Huang Y, Derryberry EP, Bertelsen MF, Sheldon FH, Brumfield RT, Mello CV, Lovell PV, Wirthlin M, Schneider MPC, Prosdocimi F, Samaniego JA, Vargas Velazquez AM, Alfaro-Núñez A, Campos PF, Petersen B, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Pas A, Bailey T, Scofield P, Bunce M, Lambert DM, Zhou Q, Perelman P, Driskell AC, Shapiro B, Xiong Z, Zeng Y, Liu S, Li Z, Liu B, Wu K, Xiao J, Yinqi X, Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Yang H, Wang J, Smeds L, Rheindt FE, Braun M, Fjeldsa J, Orlando L, Barker FK, Jønsson KA, Johnson W, Koepfli KP, O'Brien S, Haussler D, Ryder OA, Rahbek C, Willerslev E, Graves GR, Glenn TC, McCormack J, Burt D, Ellegren H, Alström P, Edwards SV, Stamatakis A, Mindell DP, Cracraft J, et alJarvis ED, Mirarab S, Aberer AJ, Li B, Houde P, Li C, Ho SYW, Faircloth BC, Nabholz B, Howard JT, Suh A, Weber CC, da Fonseca RR, Li J, Zhang F, Li H, Zhou L, Narula N, Liu L, Ganapathy G, Boussau B, Bayzid MS, Zavidovych V, Subramanian S, Gabaldón T, Capella-Gutiérrez S, Huerta-Cepas J, Rekepalli B, Munch K, Schierup M, Lindow B, Warren WC, Ray D, Green RE, Bruford MW, Zhan X, Dixon A, Li S, Li N, Huang Y, Derryberry EP, Bertelsen MF, Sheldon FH, Brumfield RT, Mello CV, Lovell PV, Wirthlin M, Schneider MPC, Prosdocimi F, Samaniego JA, Vargas Velazquez AM, Alfaro-Núñez A, Campos PF, Petersen B, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Pas A, Bailey T, Scofield P, Bunce M, Lambert DM, Zhou Q, Perelman P, Driskell AC, Shapiro B, Xiong Z, Zeng Y, Liu S, Li Z, Liu B, Wu K, Xiao J, Yinqi X, Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Yang H, Wang J, Smeds L, Rheindt FE, Braun M, Fjeldsa J, Orlando L, Barker FK, Jønsson KA, Johnson W, Koepfli KP, O'Brien S, Haussler D, Ryder OA, Rahbek C, Willerslev E, Graves GR, Glenn TC, McCormack J, Burt D, Ellegren H, Alström P, Edwards SV, Stamatakis A, Mindell DP, Cracraft J, Braun EL, Warnow T, Jun W, Gilbert MTP, Zhang G. Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 2014; 346:1320-31. [PMID: 25504713 PMCID: PMC4405904 DOI: 10.1126/science.1253451] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1171] [Impact Index Per Article: 106.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
To better determine the history of modern birds, we performed a genome-scale phylogenetic analysis of 48 species representing all orders of Neoaves using phylogenomic methods created to handle genome-scale data. We recovered a highly resolved tree that confirms previously controversial sister or close relationships. We identified the first divergence in Neoaves, two groups we named Passerea and Columbea, representing independent lineages of diverse and convergently evolved land and water bird species. Among Passerea, we infer the common ancestor of core landbirds to have been an apex predator and confirm independent gains of vocal learning. Among Columbea, we identify pigeons and flamingoes as belonging to sister clades. Even with whole genomes, some of the earliest branches in Neoaves proved challenging to resolve, which was best explained by massive protein-coding sequence convergence and high levels of incomplete lineage sorting that occurred during a rapid radiation after the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction event about 66 million years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erich D Jarvis
- Department of Neurobiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Siavash Mirarab
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Andre J Aberer
- Scientific Computing Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bo Li
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China. College of Medicine and Forensics, Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an 710061, China. Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Houde
- Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
| | - Cai Li
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China. Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simon Y W Ho
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - Brant C Faircloth
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
| | - Benoit Nabholz
- CNRS UMR 5554, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, Université Montpellier II Montpellier, France
| | - Jason T Howard
- Department of Neurobiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Alexander Suh
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala Sweden
| | - Claudia C Weber
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala Sweden
| | - Rute R da Fonseca
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jianwen Li
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Fang Zhang
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Hui Li
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Long Zhou
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Nitish Narula
- Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA. Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan
| | - Liang Liu
- Department of Statistics and Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Ganesh Ganapathy
- Department of Neurobiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Bastien Boussau
- Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Lyon, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Volodymyr Zavidovych
- Department of Neurobiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Sankar Subramanian
- Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
| | - Toni Gabaldón
- Bioinformatics and Genomics Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez
- Bioinformatics and Genomics Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaime Huerta-Cepas
- Bioinformatics and Genomics Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bhanu Rekepalli
- Joint Institute for Computational Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
| | - Kasper Munch
- Bioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Schierup
- Bioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Bent Lindow
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Wesley C Warren
- The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MI 63108, USA
| | - David Ray
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA. Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA. Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
| | - Richard E Green
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Michael W Bruford
- Organisms and Environment Division, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales, UK
| | - Xiangjiang Zhan
- Organisms and Environment Division, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales, UK. Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Andrew Dixon
- International Wildlife Consultants, Carmarthen SA33 5YL, Wales, UK
| | - Shengbin Li
- College of Medicine and Forensics, Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an, 710061, China
| | - Ning Li
- State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
| | - Yinhua Huang
- State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
| | - Elizabeth P Derryberry
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA. Museum of Natural Science and Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
| | - Mads Frost Bertelsen
- Center for Zoo and Wild Animal Health, Copenhagen Zoo Roskildevej 38, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Frederick H Sheldon
- Museum of Natural Science and Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
| | - Robb T Brumfield
- Museum of Natural Science and Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
| | - Claudio V Mello
- Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. Brazilian Avian Genome Consortium (CNPq/FAPESPA-SISBIO Aves), Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil
| | - Peter V Lovell
- Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Morgan Wirthlin
- Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Maria Paula Cruz Schneider
- Brazilian Avian Genome Consortium (CNPq/FAPESPA-SISBIO Aves), Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil. Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil
| | - Francisco Prosdocimi
- Brazilian Avian Genome Consortium (CNPq/FAPESPA-SISBIO Aves), Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil. Institute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro RJ 21941-902, Brazil
| | - José Alfredo Samaniego
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Amhed Missael Vargas Velazquez
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Paula F Campos
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bent Petersen
- Centre for Biological Sequence Analysis, Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark Kemitorvet 208, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten
- Centre for Biological Sequence Analysis, Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark Kemitorvet 208, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - An Pas
- Breeding Centre for Endangered Arabian Wildlife, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Tom Bailey
- Dubai Falcon Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Paul Scofield
- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue, Christchurch 8050, New Zealand
| | - Michael Bunce
- Trace and Environmental DNA Laboratory Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Australia
| | - David M Lambert
- Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
| | - Qi Zhou
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Polina Perelman
- Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute Frederick, MD 21702, USA. Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Amy C Driskell
- Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013, USA
| | - Beth Shapiro
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Zijun Xiong
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Yongli Zeng
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Shiping Liu
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Zhenyu Li
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Binghang Liu
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Kui Wu
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Jin Xiao
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Xiong Yinqi
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Qiuemei Zheng
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Yong Zhang
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | | | - Jian Wang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Linnea Smeds
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala Sweden
| | - Frank E Rheindt
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Michael Braun
- Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Suitland, MD 20746, USA
| | - Jon Fjeldsa
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Ludovic Orlando
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - F Keith Barker
- Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA
| | - Knud Andreas Jønsson
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK
| | - Warren Johnson
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA
| | - Klaus-Peter Koepfli
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC 20008, USA
| | - Stephen O'Brien
- Theodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia 199004. Oceanographic Center, Nova Southeastern University, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33004, USA
| | - David Haussler
- Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, UCSC, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Oliver A Ryder
- San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, Escondido, CA 92027, USA
| | - Carsten Rahbek
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK
| | - Eske Willerslev
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gary R Graves
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Department of Vertebrate Zoology, MRC-116, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA
| | - Travis C Glenn
- Department of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - John McCormack
- Moore Laboratory of Zoology and Department of Biology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041, USA
| | - Dave Burt
- Department of Genomics and Genetics, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Hans Ellegren
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala Sweden
| | - Per Alström
- Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Box 7007, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Scott V Edwards
- Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Alexandros Stamatakis
- Scientific Computing Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany. Institute of Theoretical Informatics, Department of Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D- 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - David P Mindell
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Joel Cracraft
- Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA
| | - Edward L Braun
- Department of Biology and Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Tandy Warnow
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Departments of Bioengineering and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
| | - Wang Jun
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China. Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. Princess Al Jawhara Center of Excellence in the Research of Hereditary Disorders, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia. Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai long, Taipa, Macau 999078, China. Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| | - M Thomas P Gilbert
- Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark. Trace and Environmental DNA Laboratory Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Australia.
| | - Guojie Zhang
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China. Centre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, Universitetsparken 15, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Suh A, Churakov G, Ramakodi MP, Platt RN, Jurka J, Kojima KK, Caballero J, Smit AF, Vliet KA, Hoffmann FG, Brosius J, Green RE, Braun EL, Ray DA, Schmitz J. Multiple lineages of ancient CR1 retroposons shaped the early genome evolution of amniotes. Genome Biol Evol 2014; 7:205-17. [PMID: 25503085 PMCID: PMC4316615 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Chicken repeat 1 (CR1) retroposons are long interspersed elements (LINEs) that are ubiquitous within amniote genomes and constitute the most abundant family of transposed elements in birds, crocodilians, turtles, and snakes. They are also present in mammalian genomes, where they reside as numerous relics of ancient retroposition events. Yet, despite their relevance for understanding amniote genome evolution, the diversity and evolution of CR1 elements has never been studied on an amniote-wide level. We reconstruct the temporal and quantitative activity of CR1 subfamilies via presence/absence analyses across crocodilian phylogeny and comparative analyses of 12 crocodilian genomes, revealing relative genomic stasis of retroposition during genome evolution of extant Crocodylia. Our large-scale phylogenetic analysis of amniote CR1 subfamilies suggests the presence of at least seven ancient CR1 lineages in the amniote ancestor; and amniote-wide analyses of CR1 successions and quantities reveal differential retention (presence of ancient relics or recent activity) of these CR1 lineages across amniote genome evolution. Interestingly, birds and lepidosaurs retained the fewest ancient CR1 lineages among amniotes and also exhibit smaller genome sizes. Our study is the first to analyze CR1 evolution in a genome-wide and amniote-wide context and the data strongly suggest that the ancestral amniote genome contained myriad CR1 elements from multiple ancient lineages, and remnants of these are still detectable in the relatively stable genomes of crocodilians and turtles. Early mammalian genome evolution was thus characterized by a drastic shift from CR1 prevalence to dominance and hyperactivity of L2 LINEs in monotremes and L1 LINEs in therians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Suh
- Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, Germany Department of Evolutionary Biology (EBC), Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Gennady Churakov
- Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, Germany
| | - Meganathan P Ramakodi
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University Present address: Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA Present address: Department of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Roy N Platt
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University
| | - Jerzy Jurka
- Genetic Information Research Institute, Mountain View, California
| | - Kenji K Kojima
- Genetic Information Research Institute, Mountain View, California
| | | | - Arian F Smit
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Federico G Hoffmann
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University
| | - Jürgen Brosius
- Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, Germany
| | - Richard E Green
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California
| | - Edward L Braun
- Department of Biology and Genetics Institute, University of Florida
| | - David A Ray
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University
| | - Jürgen Schmitz
- Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Retroposon presence/absence patterns in orthologous genomic loci are known to be strong and almost homoplasy-free phylogenetic markers of common ancestry. This is evidenced by the comprehensive reconstruction of various species trees of vertebrate lineages in recent years, as well as the inference of the evolution of genes via retroposon-based gene trees of paralogous genes. Recently, it has been shown that retroposon markers are also suitable for the inference of differentiation events of gametologous genes, i.e., homologous genes on opposite sex chromosomes. This is because sex chromosomes evolved via stepwise cessation of recombination, making the presence or absence of a particular retroposon insertion among the two different gametologs in more or less closely related species a clear-cut indicator of the timing of differentiation events. Here, I examine the advantages and current limitations of this novel perspective for understanding avian sex chromosome evolution, compare the retroposon-based and sequence-based insights into gametolog differentiation and show that retroposons promise to be equally applicable to other sex chromosomal systems, such as the human X and Y chromosomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Suh
- Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE); University of Münster; Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chalopin D, Fan S, Simakov O, Meyer A, Schartl M, Volff JN. Evolutionary active transposable elements in the genome of the coelacanth. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY PART B-MOLECULAR AND DEVELOPMENTAL EVOLUTION 2013; 322:322-33. [DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.22521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2013] [Revised: 05/22/2013] [Accepted: 06/17/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Domitille Chalopin
- Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon; Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon; CNRS UMR 5242; Université Lyon 1; Lyon France
| | - Shaohua Fan
- Lehrstuhl für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Department of Biology; University of Konstanz; Konstanz Germany
- Konstanz Research School Chemical Biology; University of Konstanz; Konstanz Germany
| | - Oleg Simakov
- Lehrstuhl für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Department of Biology; University of Konstanz; Konstanz Germany
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Axel Meyer
- Lehrstuhl für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Department of Biology; University of Konstanz; Konstanz Germany
- Konstanz Research School Chemical Biology; University of Konstanz; Konstanz Germany
| | - Manfred Schartl
- Department Physiological Chemistry, Biocenter; University of Wuerzburg; Wuerzburg Germany
| | - Jean-Nicolas Volff
- Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon; Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon; CNRS UMR 5242; Université Lyon 1; Lyon France
| |
Collapse
|