Expression of sex steroid receptors and Ki-67 in the endometria of menorrhagic women: effects of intrauterine levonorgestrel

Effectiveness of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) are conventional conservative treatments for adenomyosis, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel ablation technique. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of HIFU combined with GnRH-a or LNG-IUS for adenomyosis patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were searched up to December 2021. Published studies comparing HIFU plus GnRH-a with HIFU plus LNG-IUS in adenomyosis patients were assessed for eligibility by two independent authors. Risk of bias tool was utilized for risk evaluation. We selected treatment effective rate of dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as the primary outcome; effective rate of menorrhagia severity and reduction rate of adenomyotic lesion as the secondary outcomes. Adverse effects were assessed. Four studies with a total 729 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. HIFU plus LNG-IUS showed lower dysmenorrhea [within 6 months: risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-0.93, p < 0.00001; over 1 year: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.82, p < 0.00001] and less menorrhagia severity (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60-0.66, p < 0.00001) than HIFU plus GnRH-a. Both groups demonstrated equal efficacy in adenomyotic lesion reduction rate (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97-1.09, p = 0.30). Adverse effects happened equally in both groups. Combination therapy of HIFU and LNG-IUS revealed better effectiveness in treating dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia than that of HIFU and GnRH-a. However, interpreting the conclusion should be approached with caution as a result of significant heterogeneity.

Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for the Treatment of Endometriosis: Biological and Clinical Evidence

Endometriosis-associated symptomatology can be safely and effectively treated with intrauterine-released progestin, which is associated with fewer adverse effects than other therapeutic options and may be used on a long-term basis. We have herein reviewed the current literature in relation to the biological and clinical rationale for the use of an intrauterine system releasing 20 μg/day of levonorgestrel for the treatment of pelvic pain symptoms associated with endometriosis. Levonorgestrel induces endometrial glandular atrophy and decidual transformation of the stroma, reduces endometrial cell proliferation and increases apoptotic activity. After the first year of use, a 70–90% reduction in menstrual blood loss is observed. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system has proven effective in relieving pelvic pain symptoms caused by peritoneal and rectovaginal endometriosis and in reducing the risk of recurrence of dysmenorrhea after conservative surgery. Thus, the intrauterine delivery of a potent progestin may constitute an innovative, effective, safe and convenient alternative for local delivery of a potent progestin in the long-term therapy of symptomatic endometriosis.

Morphologic Changes in the Endometrium Associated With the Use of the Mirena Coil: A Retrospective Study of 106 Cases

This study outlines the histologic changes seen in 106 endometrial specimens after use of the Mirena coil (levonorgestrel) and compares these changes with previous studies. The variables assessed include nature of the endometrial glands, metaplastic glandular changes, nuclear atypia, hobnail change, and endometrial hyperplasia. Stromal changes include pseudodecidualization, mucinous change, ulceration, and infiltration by granulocytes, neutrophils, and plasma cells, and stromal hyaline nodules, a feature not described previously. Additional changes include superficial micropapillary change, infarcted decidua, dystrophic calcification, hemosiderophages, polypoid indentations, cervical microglandular hyperplasia and endocervical pseudodecidualization. These variables are compared with a similar previous study. Significant differences in the incidence of glandular metaplasia, dystrophic calcification, plasma cell infiltrates, hemosiderophages, and presence of nuclear atypia are noted. With increased use of the Mirena coil, histopathologists need to be aware of the characteristic and constant endometrial changes due to progestogenic and mechanical effects, despite a wide variation in the duration of usage.

Hormonal treatment for severe hydronephrosis caused by bladder endometriosis

The incidence of endometriosis cases involving the urinary system has recently increased, and the bladder is a specific zone where endometriosis is most commonly seen in the urinary system. In the case presented here, a patient presented to the emergency department with the complaint of side pain and was examined and diagnosed with severe hydronephrosis and bladder endometriosis was determined in the etiology. After the patient was pathologically diagnosed, Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) was administered to the uterine cavity. At the 12-month follow-up, endometriosis was not observed in the cystoscopy and symptoms had completely regressed. Hydronephrosis may be observed after exposure of the ureter, and silent renal function loss may develop in patients suffering from endometriosis with bladder involvement. For patients with moderate or severe hydronephrosis associated with bladder endometriosis, LNG-IUS application may be separately and successfully used after conservative surgery.

Intrauterine devices and endometrial cancer risk: a pooled analysis of the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium

Intrauterine devices (IUDs), long-acting and reversible contraceptives, induce a number of immunological and biochemical changes in the uterine environment that could affect endometrial cancer (EC) risk. We addressed this relationship through a pooled analysis of data collected in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. We combined individual-level data from 4 cohort and 14 case-control studies, in total 8,801 EC cases and 15,357 controls. Using multivariable logistic regression, we estimated pooled odds ratios (pooled-ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for EC risk associated with ever use, type of device, ages at first and last use, duration of use and time since last use, stratified by study and adjusted for confounders. Ever use of IUDs was inversely related to EC risk (pooled-OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.74-0.90). Compared with never use, reduced risk of EC was observed for inert IUDs (pooled-OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58-0.82), older age at first use (≥ 35 years pooled-OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.43-0.67), older age at last use (≥ 45 years pooled-OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.50-0.72), longer duration of use (≥ 10 years pooled-OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.52-0.71) and recent use (within 1 year of study entry pooled-OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.30-0.49). Future studies are needed to assess the respective roles of detection biases and biologic effects related to foreign body responses in the endometrium, heavier bleeding (and increased clearance of carcinogenic cells) and localized hormonal changes.

Analysis of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with endometriosis

Objectives

To compare the efficacy, safety and other clinical benefits of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) in women with endometriosis.

Methods

A systematic search was carried out using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE™ and EMBASE databases for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the use of the LNG-IUS and GnRH-a in premenopausal women with endometriosis.

Results

Five RCTs studies were identified. A meta-analysis showed that, in women with endometriosis, both the LNG-IUS and GnRH-a reduced pain visual analogue scale scores (weighted mean difference [WMD] 0.03 [95% confidence interval [CI] −0.53, 0.59]), serum levels of CA125 (WMD −12.29 [95% CI −29.90, 3.32]), and American Society of Reproductive Medicine staging scores (WMD 1.10 [95% CI −27.98, 30.18]). Psychological and general wellbeing index scores were increased (WMD 1.50 [95% CI −6.19, 9.19]). Levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were also significantly reduced in patients treated with the LNG-IUS (WMD 39.30 [95% CI 6.74, 71.86]).

Conclusions

The LNG-IUS had clinical efficacy equivalent to that of GnRH-a but may have some clinical advantages over GnRH-a in the treatment of endometriosis-associated symptoms. These observations will require further verification in additional studies employing larger patient populations.

Clinical applications of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system to gynecologic diseases

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), originally designed for contraception, has since been applied to various gynecologic diseases. This article summarizes the current status of clinical applications of LNG-IUS to the treatment of gynecologic diseases such as heavy menstrual bleeding, endometriosis, leiomyoma, adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia, and early-stage endometrial cancer.

Non-contraceptive health benefits of intrauterine hormonal systems

Non-contraceptive health benefits are now recognized as an important aspect of the overall impact of all hormonal contraceptives. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG IUS) are particularly effective at producing a number of health benefits for women using the LNG IUS as a contraceptive (reduced menstrual bleeding; reduced dysmenorrhea and the potential for prevention of a number of gynecological conditions in the longer term, such as iron-deficiency anemia, endometrial hyperplasia, uterine fibroids, acute episodes of pelvic inflammatory disease, endometriosis and perhaps others). The LNG IUS also has the potential to specifically treat a range of pre-existing gynecological conditions such as heavy menstrual bleeding due to a wide range of underlying causes, endometrial hyperplasia, uterine fibroids, adenomyosis, and endometriosis. These health benefits should be recognized as a key component in the decision-making process for individual women in choosing a specific type of hormonal or other contraceptive. Investment in research into the very substantial health benefits of hormonal contraceptives, such as the LNG IUS, has generally been ignored in comparison with the massive investment into understanding the often subtle or rare complications of hormonal contraceptive use. Both are important, but there is a real need to define more accurately those women who will benefit most from these health benefits.

Effects of LNG-IUS on nerve growth factor and its receptors expression in patients with adenomyosis

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is effective in the treatment of dysmenorrhea associated with adenomyosis. However, the mechanism of pain relief of LNG-IUS in patients with adenomyosis is unclear. We aimed to investigate the effects of LNG-IUS on the expression of nerve growth factor (NGF) and its receptors, NGFR p75 and TrkA in patients with adenomyosis. Endometrial and myometrial tissues were prepared from 17 LNG-IUS-treated patients and 15 hormonally untreated patients who had undergone hysterectomies for adenomyosis. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies against NGF, NGFR p75, and TrkA, was performed. The expression of NGF, NGFR p75, and TrkA in endometrium and myometrium of LNG-IUS-treated patients was significantly decreased compared to those of hormonally untreated patients. Our findings may indicate that the suppression of NGF and its receptors by LNG-IUS is another possible mechanism of relieving pain in patients with adenomyosis.

Sex hormone regulation of survivin gene expression

Survivin (BIRC5) is a cell survival gene that is overexpressed in endometrial cancer and has been implicated to have a physiological role in normal endometrial function. To determine whether survivin gene expression is regulated by reproductive steroid hormones in the human endometrium, RNA was prepared from normal cycling women in the proliferative and secretory phases of the menstrual cycle. RNA was also isolated from 21 endometrial biopsies from premenopausal women at baseline and following 3 months of treatment with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Finally, RNA was isolated from endometrial biopsies from ten healthy postmenopausal women participating in a clinical trial of estrogen replacement therapy at baseline and following 6 months of treatment with conjugated equine estrogen. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was used to determine survivin, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP1), Ki67, and IGF1 gene expression levels. Survivin gene expression was highest in the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle and showed a statistically significant 4-fold increase in expression following chronic treatment with estrogens; this was strongly correlated with increased Ki67, a marker of proliferation. Survivin gene expression decreased 4.6-fold following chronic progestin treatment in the human endometrium. These data suggest that survivin transcript is regulated by estrogens and progestins in the disease-free human endometrium. The data also suggest that survivin transcript may be used as a biomarker of estrogen and progestin treatment efficacy, but validation studies must be conducted to support this conclusion.

Development of an animal experimental model to study the effects of levonorgestrel on the human endometrium

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to develop an animal model to test the response of endometrium to local progestin delivery.

METHODS

Proliferative human endometrium was subcutaneously grafted in two groups of SCID mice that received, 2 days before, a subcutaneous estradiol (E(2)) pellet and, for half of them, an additional implant of levonorgestrel (LNG). Mice were sacrificed 1, 2, 3 or 4 weeks after endometrial implantation and grafts were histologically analysed. Proliferation, steroid hormone receptors, blood vessels and stromal decidualization in both groups (E(2) and LNG) were immunohistologically evaluated and compared with proliferative endometrium and endometrium from women with an LNG intrauterine device.

RESULTS

Grafts presented normal morphological endometrial characteristics. The expression of progesterone receptors was significantly decreased in glands and stroma of the LNG group as compared with the E(2) group at all times. A significant decrease was also observed in the stromal expression of estrogen receptor-alpha in the LNG group. At 4 weeks, the mean cross-sectional area of vessels was significantly higher after LNG treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics are similar to those observed in women treated with local LNG. This mouse model might facilitate further investigations needed to understand the mechanisms responsible for the breakthrough bleeding frequently observed in progestin users.

The levonorgestrel intrauterine system for use in peri- and postmenopausal women

The intrauterine system (IUS) delivering levonorgestrel (LNG; Mirena), initially developed as a long-acting method of contraception, has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in a large number of users all over the world. The local delivery of a small dose of a highly effective progestin in the uterine cavity maintains the endometrium in a nonproliferative state and reduces the number of bleeding days, thus preventing anemia, an important medical benefit, especially in developing countries. In addition, the intrauterine delivery of a progestin allows the treatment of other medical conditions and prevention of endometrial hyperplasia, in postmenopausal women receiving estrogen therapy. During the perimenopausal years, the IUS provides an effective contraception as occasional ovulations occur. In addition, by its direct effect on the endometrium, it prevents the occurrence of menorrhagia, a frequent condition in the premenopause. After cessation of the ovarian function, when estrogen therapy may be initiated, the IUS would ensure endometrial protection as a transition to the menopause and as long as hormone therapy is needed. Although the circulating levels of LNG are very low, minor side effects related to the androgenic properties of LNG have been reported. In addition, the insertion of the system needs a skilled health provider and may be difficult or painful when the uterus is small or atrophic. The development of smaller devices is warranted for these specific situations.

Use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea

OBJECTIVES

This report is a review of the medical literature on the use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in women with endometriosis, adenomyosis, cyclic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review was carried out using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to evaluate the use of LNG-IUS in women with endometriosis and adenomyosis.

RESULTS

Nine studies were identified, only two of which were randomized clinical trials. One compared the insertion of LNG-IUS after surgery with expectant conduct and the other compared the use of the device with a GnRH analogue (GnRH-a). All studies reported an improvement in pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea, and a reduction in menstrual bleeding. One study found an improvement in the staging of the disease at 6 months of use, and the studies that evaluated the use of LNG-IUS in women with adenomyosis reported a reduction in uterine volume. Furthermore, the only study in which women were followed up for 3 years after insertion found improvement in pelvic pain at 12 months of use. However, there was no improvement after that period.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LNG-IUS is an alternative for the medical treatment of women suffering from endometriosis, adenomyosis, chronic pelvic pain or dysmenorrhea, but experience is limited and long-term studies are necessary to reach definitive conclusions. However, for women who do not wish to become pregnant, this device offers the possibility of at least 5 years of treatment following one single intervention.

The role of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the management of symptomatic endometriosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to evaluate the biological rationale for the use of an intrauterine device releasing 20 mug/day of levonorgestrel in women with endometriosis, and to assess its efficacy in relieving pelvic pain symptoms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Levonorgestrel induces endometrial glandular atrophy and extensive decidual transformation of the stroma, downregulates endometrial cell proliferation, increases apoptotic activity, and has antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Up to 85% of patients wearing the device have anovulatory cycles during the first 3 months of use, but the proportion falls to below 35% by 12 months. After the first year of use, a 70-90% reduction in monthly blood loss is observed; few women report intermenstrual bleeding and about 20-30% amenorrhea. This is advantageous in patients experiencing dysmenorrhea. Although it is maintained that the hormonal activity of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device is local, a systemic effect secondary to uterine absorption of levonorgestrel is probable. The levonorgestrel intrauterine device has proven effective in relieving pelvic pain symptoms caused by peritoneal and rectovaginal endometriosis and in reducing the risk of recurrence of dysmenorrhea after conservative surgery.

SUMMARY

Intrauterine administration of levonorgestrel with direct distribution to pelvic tissues would imply a local concentration greater than plasma levels. This could result in a superior effectiveness with limited adverse effects and increased patient compliance during long-term treatment. Further trials are needed, however, to verify whether the good results observed are maintained during an entire 5-year period, to confirm the efficacy on dyspareunia and dyschezia, and to compare the effects of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device with those of other treatment options.

Progestogen only contraception and endometrial break through bleeding

Progestogen only contraceptives (POC) provide a safe and effective method of fertility regulation. Unfortunately, they are commonly associated with the problem of endometrial break through bleeding (BTB), often leading to discontinuation of use. An increase in endometrial vascular fragility has been demonstrated as an important mechanism that contributes to BTB but our understanding of the interaction between exogenous steroid use and endometrial vasculature remains incomplete. This review sets out to describe a number of commonly used POC, their effects on endometrial morphology and possible molecular and cellular mechanisms that may lead to unscheduled bleeding.

Serum and peritoneal fluid levels of levonorgestrel in women with endometriosis who were treated with an intrauterine contraceptive device containing levonorgestrel

OBJECTIVE

To determine and compare levels of levonorgestrel (Lng) in serum and peritoneal fluid (PF) of patients on the Lng intrauterine system Mirena (Schering Health, Berlin, Germany) for endometriosis and to relate these to symptoms.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial.

SETTING

Gynecology unit of a teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Women with minimal to moderate endometriosis at diagnostic laparoscopy.

INTERVENTION(S)

Mirena was inserted at diagnostic laparoscopy and blood and PF collected for Lng levels. Levonorgestrel was again quantified in serum at 1, 3, and 6 months and PF at 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Serum and PF Lng levels during 6 months, differences in levels before and 6 months after Mirena insertion, and the relationship between these levels and symptoms of endometriosis.

RESULT(S)

There was significant improvement in symptoms after 6 months on Mirena. The mean (SD) serum Lng levels were 459.2 (100.2), 368.2 (51.8), and 357.3 (53.0) pg/mL at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. The PF levels at 6 months were approximately two-thirds the serum levels in patients showing improvement in symptoms.

CONCLUSION(S)

Mirena delivers significant amounts of Lng into the PF and serum. The relationship between Lng levels in these compartments is linear.

Lack of effect of isoflavonoids on the vagina and endometrium in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of soy-derived isoflavones on vaginal epithelium and the endometrium.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic of a university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Sixty-four postmenopausal women with a history of breast cancer.

INTERVENTION(S)

The women took (in a randomized order) 114 mg of isolated isoflavonoids or placebo in tablets daily for 3 months; the treatment regimens were crossed over after a 2-month washout period. The subjects were studied before and on the last day of each treatment period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Vaginal dryness, maturation index (MI) of vaginal epithelium, endometrial thickness, histology, and expression of estrogen (E) and progesterone (P) receptors and the proliferation marker Ki-67 in the endometrium.

RESULT(S)

Isolated isoflavones did not relieve vaginal dryness. Maturation index values remained unchanged during the isoflavone regimen, but decreased during the placebo regimen. No changes were found in any of the variables measured in the endometrium.

CONCLUSION(S)

Daily administration of 114 mg of isolated isoflavones for 3 months had no effect on the subjective perception of vaginal dryness or on objective findings in the vagina or endometrium. This implies safety with regard to the endometrium.

The efficacy, side-effects and continuation rates in women with symptomatic endometriosis undergoing treatment with an intra-uterine administered progestogen (levonorgestrel): a 3 year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Side-effects and choice of drugs influence compliance during treatment for endometriosis. Progestogen administered by a device with a 5-year lifespan, has been shown to be an effective medical alternative with several advantages. The aims of this study were to investigate its efficacy, continuation rates and side-effects in women with endometriosis over a 3-year period.

METHODS

Thirty-four women with laparoscopically confirmed minimal to moderate symptomatic endometriosis offered insertion of an intrauterine device at diagnostic laparoscopy were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months, and then every 6 months for 3 years. A symptom diary for side-effects, documentation of symptoms on a visual analogue scale (VAS), a verbal rating scale (VRS) and quantified menstrual loss using the pictorial blood loss chart was used to assess response to treatment.

RESULTS

The continuation rates were respectively 85%, 68%, 62% and 56% at, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Discontinuation rates were highest at <12 months, and most of these were for irregular and intolerable bleeding and persistent pain. An improvement in symptoms was observed throughout the 36 months. The greatest changes in pain assessed by either the VAS or VRS were between the pretreatment scores and those after 12 months (7.7 +/- 1.3 versus 3.5 +/- 1.8 for VAS, P < 0.001; and 25 +/- 13.8 versus 14 +/- 9.4 for VRS, P < 0.002). The monthly quantified blood loss fell from 204 (196) pretreatment to 60 (50) at 12 months (P < 0.001) and then to 70 (30) after 36 months. The most common side-effects were bleeding irregularities (14.7%), one-sided abdominal pain (11.8%) and weight gain (8.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intrauterine progestogen is effective in symptom control throughout the 3 years on the device, and discontinuation is greatest between 3 and 6 months. For those patients with improvement in symptoms, it is an acceptable long-term alternative.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Menorrhagia is a frequent reason for women to seek medical care and an increasingly common health problem. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is an effective medical treatment for menorrhagia. Emerging clinical and research evidence suggests that this new treatment modality has major health benefits.

RECENT FINDINGS

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is a cost-effective treatment modality for menorrhagia. The quality of life improves significantly which is comparable to that gained with hysterectomy. The costs are about half those of hysterectomy after 5 years of follow-up. Unscheduled breakthrough bleeding is the most common side effect of the treatment. There are different new theories about the mechanism underlying this problem. Women with endometriosis or fibroids also benefit from this treatment.

SUMMARY

Because menorrhagia is often a reason for seeking medical attention, it is important to consider the outcomes and costs to provide the most appropriate care. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system improves health-related quality of life significantly at relatively low cost. It is the most effective medical treatment for menorrhagia and comparable to surgical interventions. The system is not associated with serious complications. Although not all women are successfully treated, about 60% avoid hysterectomy and are satisfied with the treatment. Thus, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system should be the first line of treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Effects of ospemifene, a novel SERM, on hormones, genital tract, climacteric symptoms, and quality of life in postmenopausal women: a double-blind, randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Ospemifene, a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator, shows a potential for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. We studied the effects of ospemifene on hormone levels, genital tract organs, climacteric symptoms, and quality of life.

DESIGN

A double-blinded study in which 160 postmenopausal women were randomly allocated to receive either ospemifene at three different daily doses (30, 60, or 90 mg) or placebo for 3 months.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed among the study groups in clinical characteristics or parameters reflecting estrogen action at baseline. Ospemifene reduced follicle-stimulating hormone and insulin-like growth factor I levels, whereas estradiol failed to change at all, and luteinizing hormone was reduced only in the 90-mg group of ospemifene. In the vast majority of participants, the endometrium remained atrophic after 3 months of treatment with ospemifene. Although the rate of proliferative endometrium slightly increased in all groups, including placebo, no hyperplasia or bleeding occurred in any participant. Ospemifene had no effect on the appearance of proliferation marker Ki-67 in the endometrium as compared with placebo, and endometrial thickness increased by mean 0.4 to 0.6 mm (P < 0.01, P < 0.05 and P < 0.05 for 30, 60 and 90 mg ospemifene, respectively). Uterine volume slightly increased (8.4%-14.7%) in the ospemifene groups (P > 0.05), perhaps as a result of increased uterine blood flow. The most conspicuous finding was the significant estrogenic effect on vaginal epithelium, as evidenced by an increase in intermediate and superficial cells in repeat Pap smears. Ospemifene was not observed to aggravate climacteric symptoms or cause adverse events, nor did it suppress climacteric symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Ospemifene at daily doses of 30 to 90 mg did not stimulate endometrium or aggravate hot flashes but clearly had a rather strong estrogenic effect on the vaginal epithelium during a 3-month treatment period. Such effects would be advantageous if ospemifene were found to be effective in the long-term prevention of osteoporosis.

Therapeutic use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with menorrhagia: a pilot study(1)

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and performance, for up to 1 year, of an intrauterine system releasing 20 microg/day of levonorgestrel (LNG-IUS, Mirena) in the treatment of women with menorrhagia. It was a descriptive, prospective, non-comparative study. A 20 microg/day LNG-releasing-IUS was inserted on any day during bleeding to 44 women (between 24 and 49 years of age) who presented with menorrhagia after medical therapies had failed. Menstrual patterns were assessed, and hemoglobin concentrations were measured before LNG-IUS was inserted and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of use. The most common bleeding pattern at 3 months after insertion was spotting, and after 6, 9, and 12 months the majority of women presented with amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea. Three women requested removal of the LNG-IUS because of spotting, and six women expelled it spontaneously. Hemoglobin levels were improved from 102 g/L to 123 and 128 g/L at 3 and 12 months, respectively, after insertion of the LNG-IUS (p < 0.01). At 12 months 79.5% of participants continued the use of LNG-IUS. In conclusion, LNG-IUS was an effective treatment for three out of four women with menorrhagia and could be an alternative treatment for women with menorrhagia who are either contraindicated for or refuse hysterectomy or endometrial ablation.