Regulation of phage Mu repressor transcription by IHF depends on the level of the early transcription

Transcriptional interference--a crash course

The term "transcriptional interference" (TI) is widely used but poorly defined in the literature. There are a variety of methods by which one can interfere with the process or the product of transcription but the term TI usually refers to the direct negative impact of one transcriptional activity on a second transcriptional activity in cis. Two recent studies, one examining Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the other Escherichia coli, clearly show TI at one promoter caused by the arrival of a transcribing complex initiating at a distant promoter. TI is potentially widespread throughout biology; therefore, it is timely to assess exactly its nature, significance and operative mechanisms. In this article, we will address the following questions: what is TI, how important and widespread is it, how does it work and where should we focus our future research efforts?

Replication control of a small cryptic plasmid of Escherichia coli

The role of the RepA initiator protein in replication and copy-number control of pKL1, a small cryptic plasmid of Escherichia coli, was elucidated. The identified ori region encompasses a copy-number control element (cop) and an active single-strand initiation signal (ssi), n'-pasH, which were essential for efficient plasmid replication. The cop region also harbors a region of plasmid incompatibility, inc, encompassing a stem-loop structure, the repA promoter, Prep, as well as two distinct RepA binding sites, BD-1 and BD-2. RepA was shown to bind to these sites quite differently, binding primarily as a monomer or dimer to BD-1 to initiate RepA transcription and plasmid replication, and as higher oligomers to BD-2 to autoregulate repA transcription, the balance being reflected in plasmid copy number. An active integration host factor (IHF) binding sequence was located in the cop region and plasmid replication was shown to be dependent on host IHF encoding genes himA and himD. Low concentrations of IHF predisposed the cop region to RepA binding, although when highly expressed in trans RepA effectively displaced bound IHF and it overcame IHF dependency. Incompatibility was shown to be due to the titration of RepA at the cop locus but could be easily overridden by excess RepA. Both RepA binding sites were required to maintain incompatibility and effective pKL1 replication. Neither antisense RNA nor iterons were found to be involved in pKL1 regulation, thus pKL1 is a novel example of autoregulation of DNA replication. When produced in excess from a helper plasmid, RepA induced pKL1 replication to unusually high levels (>2500 copies/cell). In addition, pKL1 replication could be artificially modulated and a wide range of copy numbers maintained.

Starvation-induced Mucts62-mediated coding sequence fusion: a role for ClpXP, Lon, RpoS and Crp

The formation of araB-lacZ coding sequence fusions in Escherichia coli is a particular type of chromosomal rearrangement induced by Mucts62, a thermoinducible mutant of mutator phage Mu. Fusion formation is controlled by the host physiology. It only occurs after aerobic carbon starvation and requires the phage-encoded transposase pA, suggesting that these growth conditions trigger induction of the Mucts62 prophage. Here, we show that thermal induction of the prophage accelerated araB-lacZ fusion formation, confirming that derepression is a rate-limiting step in the fusion process. Nonetheless, starvation conditions remained essential to complete fusions, suggesting additional levels of physiological regulation. Using a transcriptional fusion indicator system in which the Mu early lytic promoter is fused to the reporter E. coli lacZ gene, we confirmed that the Mucts62 prophage was derepressed in stationary phase (S derepression) at low temperature. S derepression did not apply to prophages that expressed the Mu wild-type repressor. It depended upon the host ClpXP and Lon ATP-dependent proteases and the RpoS stationary phase-specific sigma factor, but not upon Crp. None of these four functions was required for thermal induction. Crp was required for fusion formation, but only when the Mucts62 prophage encoded the transposition/replication activating protein pB. Finally, we found that thermally induced cultures did not return to the repressed state when shifted back to low temperature and, hence, remained activated for accelerated fusion formation upon starvation. The maintenance of the derepressed state required the ClpXP and Lon host proteases and the prophage Ner-regulatory protein. These observations illustrate how the cts62 mutation in Mu repressor provides the prophage with a new way to respond to growth phase-specific regulatory signals and endows the host cell with a new potential for adaptation through the controlled use of the phage transposition machinery.

The integration host factor-DNA complex upstream of the early promoter of bacteriophage Mu is functionally symmetric

Inversion of the ihf site in the promoter region of the early promoter of bacteriophage Mu did not influence the integration host factor (IHF)-mediated functions. IHF bound to this inverted site could counteract H-NS-mediated repression, directly activate transcription, and support lytic growth of bacteriophage Mu. This implies that the IHF heterodimer and its asymmetrical binding site form a functionally symmetrical complex.

Function of the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase in basal expression and integration host factor-mediated activation of the early promoter of bacteriophage Mu

Integration host factor (IHF) can activate transcription from the early promoter (Pe) of bacteriophage Mu both directly and indirectly. Indirect activation occurs through alleviation of H-NS-mediated repression of the Pe promoter (P. Van Ulsen, M. Hillebrand, L. Zulianello, P. Van de Putte, and N. Goosen, Mol. Microbiol. 21:567-578, 1996). The direct activation involves the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit (alphaCTD) of RNA polymerase. We investigated which residues in the alphaCTD are important for IHF-mediated activation of the Pe promoter. Initial in vivo screening, using a set of substitution mutants derived from an alanine scan (T. Gaal, W. Ross, E. E. Blatter, T. Tang, X. Jia, V. V. Krishnan, N. Assa-Munt, R. Ebright, and R. L. Gourse, Genes Dev. 10:16-26, 1996; H. Tang, K. Severinov, A. Goldfarb, D. Fenyo, B. Chait, and R. H. Ebright, Genes Dev. 8:3058-3067, 1994), indicated that the residues, which are required for transcription activation by the UP element of the rrnB P1 promoter (T. Gaal, W. Ross, E. E. Blatter, T. Tang, X. Jia, V. V. Krishnan, N. Assa-Munt, R. Ebright, and R. L. Gourse, Genes Dev. 10:16-26, 1996), are also important for Pe expression in the presence of IHF. Two of the RNA polymerase mutants, alphaR265A and alphaG296A, that affected Pe expression most in vivo were subsequently tested in in vitro transcription experiments. Mutant RNA polymerase with alphaR265A showed no IHF-mediated activation and a severely reduced basal level of transcription from the Pe promoter. Mutant RNA polymerase with alphaG296A resulted in a slightly reduced transcription from the Pe promoter in the absence of IHF but could still be activated by IHF. These results indicate that interaction of the alphaCTD with DNA is involved not only in the IHF-mediated activation of Pe transcription but also in maintaining the basal level of transcription from this promoter. Mutational analysis of the upstream region of the Pe promoter identified a sequence, positioned from -39 to -51 with respect to the transcription start site, that is important for basal Pe expression, presumably through binding of the alphaCTD. The role of the alphaCTD in IHF-mediated stimulation of transcription from the Pe promoter is discussed.

Integration host factor alleviates the H-NS-mediated repression of the early promoter of bacteriophage Mu

Integration host factor (IHF), which is a histone-like protein, has been shown to positively regulate transcription in two different ways. It can either help the formation of a complex between a transcription factor and RNA polymerase or it can itself activate RNA polymerase without the involvement of other transcription factors. In this study, we present a third mechanism for IHF-stimulated gene expression, by counteracting the repression by another histone-like protein, H-NS. The early (Pe) promoter of bacteriophage Mu is specifically inhibited by H-NS, both in vivo and in vitro. For this inhibition, H-NS binds to a large DNA region overlapping the Pe promoter. Binding of IHF to a binding site just upstream of Pe alleviates the H-NS-mediated repression of transcription. This same ihf site is also involved in the direct activation of Pe by IHF. In contrast to the direct activation by IHF, however, the alleviating effect of IHF appears not to be dependent on the relevant position of the ihf site on the DNA helix, and it also does not require the presence of the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase. Footprint analysis shows that binding of IHF to the ihf site destabilizes the interaction of H-NS with the DNA, not only in the IHF-binding region but also in the DNA regions flanking the ihf site. These results suggest that IHF disrupts a higher-order nucleoprotein complex that is formed by H-NS and the DNA.

Participation of the flank regions of the integration host factor protein in the specificity and stability of DNA binding

The heterodimeric integration host factor (IHF) protein is a site-specific DNA-binding protein from Escherichia coli that strongly bends the DNA. It has been proposed (Yang, C., and Nash, H.A. (1989) Cell 57, 869-880; Granston, A. E., and Nash, H. A. (1993) J. Mol. Biol 234, 45-59; Lee, E. C., Hales, L. M., Gumport, R. I., and Gardner, J. F. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 305-313) that the wrapping of the DNA around the protein is stabilized through interactions between the flanks of the protein and the DNA. In order to elucidate which domains of the IHF protein are involved in these interactions, we have constructed mutant proteins in which the C-terminal part of one of the subunits has been deleted. We observed that the C-terminal alpha 3 helix of HimD is involved in the stability of DNA binding, but not in the specificity. In contrast the corresponding alpha 3 helix of HimA is essential for the sequence specificity, since an IHF mutant lacking this domain only binds to the DNA in a non-specific way. The possible role of the two C-terminal alpha-helical structures in complex formation will be discussed. We also examined the properties of an IHF mutant that has an amino acid substitution between beta sheets beta 1 and beta 2 of the HimD subunit (R46H). The occupancy of the ihf site by the mutant and wild type proteins differ in the 3' part of the ihf site and as a result the bend introduced in the DNA by the mutant protein is less pronounced. We propose that the arginine 46 in the HimD subunit is in vicinity of the TTR region of the consensus and that through contacts within the minor groove the DNA bend introduced by IHF is stabilized.

Localization of the VirA domain involved in acetosyringone-mediated vir gene induction in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

The VirA protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is thought to be a receptor for plant phenolic compounds such as acetosyringone. Although it is not known whether the interaction between VirA and the phenolics is direct or requires other phenolic-binding proteins, it is shown in this study that the first 280 amino acids of the VirA protein are not essential for the acetosyringone mediated vir gene induction response. Considering the fact that the cytoplasmic region between the amino acids 283 and 304 is highly conserved between the different VirA proteins, and that deletion of this region abolishes VirA activity, we suggest that the acetosyringone receptor domain is located in this cytoplasmic domain of the VirA protein.

Promoters responsive to DNA bending: a common theme in prokaryotic gene expression

The early notion of DNA as a passive target for regulatory proteins has given way to the realization that higher-order DNA structures and DNA-protein complexes are at the basis of many molecular processes, including control of promoter activity. Protein binding may direct the bending of an otherwise linear DNA, exacerbate the angle of an intrinsic bend, or assist the directional flexibility of certain sequences within prokaryotic promoters. The important, sometimes essential role of intrinsic or protein-induced DNA bending in transcriptional regulation has become evident in virtually every system examined. As discussed throughout this article, not every function of DNA bends is understood, but their presence has been detected in a wide variety of bacterial promoters subjected to positive or negative control. Nonlinear DNA structures facilitate and even determine proximal and distal DNA-protein and protein-protein contacts involved in the various steps leading to transcription initiation.

Inhibition of bacteriophage Mu transposition by Mu repressor and Fis

In this paper we show that the Escherichia coli protein Fis has a regulatory function in Mu transposition in the presence of Mu repressor. Fis can lower the transposition frequency of a mini-Mu 3-80-fold, but only if the Mu repressor is expressed simultaneously. In this novel type of regulation of transposition by the concerted action of Fis and repressor, the IAS, the internal activating sequence, is also involved as deletion of this site lead to the loss of the Fis effect. As the IAS contains strong repressor binding sites these are probably the target for the repressor in the observed negative regulation by Fis and repressor. However, the role of Fis and repressor is not only to inactivate the IAS, since a 4 bp insertion in the IAS, which changes the spacing of the repressor-binding site, abolishes the enhancing function of the IAS but leaves the repressor-Fis effect intact. A likely target for Fis in this regulation is a strong Fis-binding site, which is located adjacent to the L2 transposase-binding site. However, when this Fis-binding sequence was substituted by a random sequence and Fis no longer showed specific binding to this site, the Fis effect was still observed. Although it is still possible that Fis can function by binding to this non-specific site in a particular complex, it seems more likely that Fis is directly or indirectly involved in determining the level of the repressor.

The virA promoter is a host-range determinant in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

The limited host range (LHR) Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain Ag162 is an isolate with a narrow host range. Introduction of the wide host range (WHR) virA gene is essential for extending the host range to Kalanchoë daigremontiana. In this report we show that the region upstream of the ATG start codon is responsible for the LHR phenomenon and that this is probably due to the non-inducibility of the LHRvirA promoter. By comparing the characteristics of the LHR and WHR VirA receptor proteins, it was found that the LHR VirA protein is able to activate the WHR VirG protein in the presence of acetosyringone and that this acetosyringone-dependent vir-induction is enhanced by the presence of D-glucose, as in the case of WHR VirA proteins. These results indicate that the domains, acting as receptors for sugars and phenolic signals, must be conserved between the LHR and WHR VirA receptor proteins.

Escherichia coli integration host factor stabilizes bacteriophage Mu repressor interactions with operator DNA in vitro

Using gel retardation and DNase I protection techniques, we have demonstrated that the Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF) stabilizes the interaction between Mu repressor and its cognate operator-binding sites in vitro. These results are discussed in terms of a model in which IHF may commit the phage to the lytic or lysogenic pathway depending on the occupancy of the operator sites by the repressor.

Stabilization of bacteriophage Mu repressor-operator complexes by the Escherichia coli integration host factor protein

All of the previously described effects of integration host factor (IHF) on bacteriophage Mu development have supported the view that IHF favours transposition-replication over the alternative state of lysogenic phage growth. In this report we show that, consistent with a model in which Mu repressor binding to its operators requires a particular topology of the operator DNA, IHF stimulates repressor binding to the O1 and O2 operators and enhances Mu repression. IHF would thus be one of the keys, besides supercoiling and the H-NS protein, that lock the operator region into the appropriate topological conformation for high-affinity binding not only of the phage transposase but also of the phage repressor.

Characterization of the lysogenic repressor (c) from transposable Mu-like bacteriophage D108

The c gene products from related, transposable phages Mu and D108 encode lysogenic repressors which negatively regulate transcription and transposition. Using the gel shift assay to monitor c-operator specific DNA-binding activity, the 19.5 kDa D108 c repressor was purified to homogeneity. Sequence analysis of the N-terminus confirmed the identity of the purified protein as the repressor and ascribed its ATG initiation codon to base pair 864 from the D108 left end. Analytical gel filtration and dimethyl suberimidate cross-linking of repressor at 0.1-0.5 microM concentrations revealed that the repressor protein could form oligomers in the absence of its DNA substrate. From DNase I footprinting and gel mobility shift analyses, the D108 repressor only bound to two operators (O1 and O2) which, as in Mu, flank an Integration Host Factor (IHF) binding site. In contrast to Mu, an O3 site in D108 was not found. Moreover, D108 repressor first bound operator O2, while occupancy of O1 required higher protein concentrations. The implications of these results on the D108 regulatory system are discussed.

Genes coding for integration host factor are conserved in gram-negative bacteria

A genetic system for the selection of clones coding for integration host factor and HU homologs is described. We demonstrate that the himA and hip genes of Serratia marcescens and Aeromonas proteolytica can substitute for the Escherichia coli genes in a variety of biological assays. We find that the sequence and genetic organization of the himA and hip genes of S. marcescens are highly conserved.

A single amino acid substitution changes the substrate specificity of quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase in Gluconobacter oxydans

Gluconobacter oxydans contains pyrroloquinoline quinone-dependent glucose dehydrogenase (GDH). Two isogenic G. oxydans strains, P1 and P2, which differ in their substrate specificity with respect to oxidation of sugars have been analysed. P1 can oxidize only D-glucose, whereas P2 is also capable of the oxidation of the disaccharide maltose. To investigate the nature of this maltose-oxidizing property we cloned the gene encoding GDH from P2. Expression of P2 gdh in P1 enables the latter strain to oxidize maltose, indicating that a mutation in the P2 gdh gene is responsible for the change in substrate specificity. This mutation could be ascribed to a 1 bp substitution resulting in the replacement of His 787 by Asn.

Analysis of the IHF binding site in the regulatory region of bacteriophage Mu

In bacteriophage Mu the converging early and repressor transcriptions are both stimulated by binding of IHF to the same region, which is located just upstream of the early promoter (Pe) and 100 base pairs downstream of the repressor promoter (Pc). Within this region two sequences are present (ihfa and ihfb) that match the consensus sequence for IHF binding. These sequences are partially overlapping and in inverted orientation. In this paper we describe the effect of mutations in the non-overlapping part of ihfa and ihfb on the binding of IHF. We show that IHF has a very strong preference to bind to ihfb even when a mutated ihfa has a better match with the consensus. A stretch of A residues located nine base pairs from the ihfb sequence appears to play an important role in the stability of the DNA-IHF complex, but not in the discrimination between the two putative binding sites. In addition we describe the effect of the mutations on the stimulation of early and repressor transcription. We show that for activation of the Pc promoter a stable complex between IHF and the DNA is required, whereas for normal Pe stimulation a much weaker DNA-IHF interaction is sufficient.