Activation of the Klebsiella pneumoniae nifU promoter: identification of multiple and overlapping upstream NifA binding sites

Specialization of the Reiterated Copies of the Heterodimeric Integration Host Factor Genes in Geobacter sulfurreducens

Integration host factor (IHF) is a widely distributed small heterodimeric protein member of the bacterial Nucleoid-Associated Proteins (NAPs), implicated in multiple DNA regulatory processes. IHF recognizes a specific DNA sequence and induces a large bend of the nucleic acid. IHF function has been mainly linked with the regulation of RpoN-dependent promoters, where IHF commonly recognizes a DNA sequence between the enhancer-binding region and the promoter, facilitating a close contact between the upstream bound activator and the promoter bound, RNA polymerase. In most proteobacteria, the genes encoding IHF subunits (ihfA and ihfB) are found in a single copy. However, in some Deltaproteobacteria, like Geobacter sulfurreducens, those genes are duplicated. To date, the functionality of IHF reiterated encoding genes is unknown. In this work, we achieved the functional characterization of the ihfA-1, ihfA-2, ihfB-1, and ihfB-2 from G. sulfurreducens. Unlike the ΔihfA-2 or ΔihfB-1 strains, single gene deletion in ihfA-1 or ihfB-2, provokes an impairment in fumarate and Fe(III) citrate reduction. Accordingly, sqRT-PCR experiments showed that ihfA-1 and ihfB-2 were expressed at higher levels than ihfA-2 and ihfB-1. In addition, RNA-Seq analysis of the ΔihfA-1 and ΔihfB-2 strains revealed a total of 89 and 122 differentially expressed genes, respectively. Furthermore, transcriptional changes in 25 genes were shared in both mutant strains. Among these genes, we confirmed the upregulation of the pilA-repressor, GSU1771, and downregulation of the triheme-cytochrome (pgcA) and the aconitate hydratase (acnA) genes by RT-qPCR. EMSA experiments also demonstrated the direct binding of IHF to the upstream promoter regions of GSU1771, pgcA and acnA. PilA changes in ΔihfA-1 and ΔihfB-2 strains were also verified by immunoblotting. Additionally, heme-staining of subcellular fractions in ΔihfA-1 and ΔihfB-2 strains revealed a remarkable deficit of c-type cytochromes. Overall, our data indicate that at least during fumarate and Fe(III) citrate reduction, the functional IHF regulator is likely assembled by the products of ihfA-1 and ihfB-2. Also, a role of IHF controlling expression of multiple genes (other than RpoN-dependent) affects G. sulfurreducens physiology and extracellular electron transfer.

Compilation and analysis of sigma(54)-dependent promoter sequences

Promoters recognized by the RNA-polymerase with the alternative sigma factor sigma(54) (Esigma54) are unique in having conserved positions around -24 and -12 nucleotides upstream from the transcriptional start site, instead of the typical -35 and -10 boxes. Here we compile 186 -24/-12 promoter sequences reported in the literature and generate an updated and extended consensus sequence. The use of the extended consensus increases the probability of identifying genuine -24/-12 promoters. The effect of several reported mutations at the -24/-12 elements on RNA-polymerase binding and promoter strength is discussed in the light of the updated consensus.

In vivo genomic footprinting analysis reveals that the complex Bradyrhizobium japonicum fixRnifA promoter region is differently occupied by two distinct RNA polymerase holoenzymes

The Bradyrhizobium japonicum fixRnifA operon is transcribed from two promoters: fixRp1, a -24/-12 promoter recognized by the sigma54-holoenzyme form of the RNA polymerase, and fixRp2, a -35/-10 promoter that is transcribed by a second, unidentified, form of RNA polymerase holoenzyme. The fixRp1 promoter is autoregulated during microaerobiosis by NifA, whereas fixRp2 is also activated, but by a different regulatory protein. The main transcription start sites for these promoters are just two nucleotides apart, such that the conserved -12 and -10 regions of fixRp1 and fixRp2, respectively, must overlap each other, whereas the -24 and -35 regions lie one DNA helical turn apart. Using in vivo genomic dimethyl sulfate and KMnO4 footprinting, we showed that the promoter region is differentially protected, depending upon which holoenzyme is bound. Mutagenesis analyses indicated that positions from -12 to -14 are critical for the activity of both promoters, whereas mutations at -10 and -11 affected mainly fixRp2 expression. When the sequence of the putative -35 region of fixRp2 was modified to match the putative consensus, expression from this promoter was increased 3-fold and the reactivity toward KMnO4, but not the transcriptional start site, moved two nucleotides further upstream, indicating that the altered promoter forms a different open complex. Additionally, we detected NifA-dependent methylation protection of two atypical NifA binding sites and protection of guanine -75. The latter residue is located in a region critical for fixRp2 promoter activation. The results present direct physical evidence of the complexity of the organization, regulation, and function of the fixRnifA promoter region.

The transcription initiation pathway of sigma 54 mutants that bypass the enhancer protein requirement. Implications for the mechanism of activation

In vitro transcription, DNase I footprinting, and abortive initiation assays were used to characterize transcription using mutant forms of sigma 54 shown previously to bypass certain enhancer requirements in vitro. The holoenzymes containing these sigma mutants produce low levels of open complexes at both the glnAp2 and glnHp2 promoters. The open complexes are unusual in that they are destroyed by heparin. Enhancer protein and ATP convert them into a stable heparin-resistant state. The enhancer response occurs over a similar range of NtrC concentration as occurs with the wild-type holoenzyme, indicating that the activation determinants have been largely preserved within these mutants. One-round transcription assays show that the mutant holoenzymes can be driven to transcribe both promoters without NtrC. The unstable opening induced by these mutations apparently serves as a conduit that can shuttle templates into transcriptionally competent complexes. The results lead to a model in which activation occurs in two steps. First, the enhancer complex overcomes an inhibitory effect of the sigma 54 leucine patch and unlocks the melting activity of the holoenzyme. Second, different sigma 54 determinants are used to drive stabilization of the open complexes, allowing the full transcription potential to be realized.

Regulatory proteins and cis-acting elements involved in the transcriptional control of Rhizobium etli reiterated nifH genes

In Rhizobium etli the nitrogenase reductase genes are reiterated. Strain CE3 has three copies; nifHa and nifHb form part of nifHDK operons with the nitrogenase structural genes, while nifHc is linked to a truncated nifD homolog. Their sequences are identical up to 6 residues upstream from a sigma54-dependent promoter. A remarkable difference among them is the absence of canonical NifA binding sites upstream of nifHc while a canonical binding site is located 200 bp upstream of nifHa and nifHb. To evaluate the transcriptional regulation of the reiterated nifH genes, we constructed fusions of nifHa and nifHc with the lacZ gene of Escherichia coli. Both genes were expressed at maximum levels under 1% oxygen in free-living cultures, and their expression declined as the oxygen concentration was increased. This expression was dependent on the integrity of nifA, and nifHc was expressed at higher levels than nifHa. The same pattern was observed with root nodule bacteroids. Expression of both genes in E. coli required sigma54 in addition to NifA bound to the upstream activator sequence. In vivo dimethyl sulfate footprinting analyses showed that NifA binds to the canonical site upstream of nifHa and to a TGT half-site 6 nucleotides further upstream. NifA protected an imperfect binding site upstream of nijHc at position 85 from the promoter. The integration host factor stimulated each gene differently, nifHa being more dependent on this protein. The above results correlate the asymmetric arrangement of cis-acting elements with a differential expression of the reiterated nifH genes, both in culture and during symbiosis with bean plants.

The two overlapping Azospirillum brasilense upstream activator sequences have differential effects on nifH promoter activity

The Azospirillum brasilense nifH promoter is positively controlled by the NifA protein bound to the upstream activator sequences (UASs). Two overlapping UASs located at -191 and -182 were identified with the consensus TGT-N10-ACA motif. The role of the two UASs of Azospirillum brasilense nifH promoter was examined by introducing base substitutions in the NifA binding sites. Both the promoter down phenotype of a mutation in UAS2 and increased activation when UAS1 was mutated reveal that the integrity of the UAS2 is required for the efficient activation of nifH promoter. This atypical NifA-binding site may represent a region interacting with two NifA dimers.

Physical organization of the upper pathway operon promoter of the Pseudomonas TOL plasmid. Sequence and positional requirements for XylR-dependent activation of transcription

The upper pathway operon of the Pseudomonas putida TOL plasmid belongs to the -12/-24 class of promoters. These promoters exhibit three regions critical for regulated transcription, namely, the -12/-24 site for RNA polymerase/sigma 54 binding, the -55/-67 region for IHF protein binding, and the -130(UAS2)/-170(UAS1) region, where two sites for XylR binding are located. The XylR-protected G residues located at -131, -139, -160 and -169 were replaced with As, and the activity of the mutant promoters was assayed after fusion to a promoterless lacZ gene. The mutation (G(-169)-->A) resulted in a 50% decrease in expression from the promoter (Pu), whereas the other three changes had no significant effect. The XylR recognition sequence UAS2 has a perfect inverted repeat (5'-ATTTN4-AAAT-3') while UAS1 shows two mismatches (5'-CCTTN4AAAT-3'). The two Cs (located at -172 and -173), which interrupt the inverted repeat, were changed as follows: C(-172)-->T; C(-173)-->A, CC(-172, -173)-->AT. Transcription activation from the mutant promoters was measured as beta-galactosidase activity after fusion to lacZ; the better the palindromic sequence, the higher the rate of transcription from Pu, with increases in activity of up to 50%. The introduction of one or two full helix turns between the IHF and the XylR binding sites did not significantly affect transcription from Pu; however, the insertion of three helix turns resulted in a drop of 90% in the activity. The non-permissive effect of insertion of three full helix turns between the IHF and XylR binding sites was not evident in an IHF- background.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Activity of purified NIFA, a transcriptional activator of nitrogen fixation genes

The NIFA protein activates transcription of nitrogen fixation (nif) operons by the sigma 54-holoenzyme form of RNA polymerase. We purified active NIFA from Klebsiella pneumoniae in the form of a maltose-binding protein (MBP)-NIFA fusion; proteolytic release of MBP yielded inactive and insoluble NIFA. MBP-NIFA activated transcription from the nifHDK promoter in a purified transcription system. Like the related transcriptional activator NTRC, MBP-NIFA catalyzed the ATP-dependent isomerization of closed complexes between sigma 54-holoenzyme and a promoter to open complexes. MBP-NIFA had a broader nucleotide specificity than NTRC, being able to utilize pyrimidine in addition to purine nucleoside triphosphates. Both MBP-NIFA and a purified C-terminal fragment of NIFA bound to the upstream activation sequence for the nifHDK promoter, as assessed by DNAse I footprinting. When assays were performed at 37 degrees C instead of the usual 30 degrees C, transcriptional activation, open complex formation, and DNA binding by MBP-NIFA were all abolished, consistent with the known heat lability of NIFA. However, the purified C-terminal fragment of NIFA still bound the upstream activation sequence at 37 degrees C, indicating that the function of the helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif is not inherently heat-labile.

The Klebsiella pneumoniae nifJ promoter: analysis of promoter elements regulating activation by the NifA promoter

The nifJ and nifH promoters of Klebsiella pneumoniae are divergently transcribed sigma 54-dependent promoters that are positively activated by the NifA protein. NifA binds to upstream activator sequences (UASs), usually located 60-200 bp upstream of the start of transcription. Bound NifA is presented to the RNA polymerase-sigma 54 complex (E sigma 54) via DNA loop formation, mediated by the binding of integration host factor protein (IHF) between E sigma 54 and NifA. The nifJ promoter sequence contains three potential NifA binding sites (UAS1, 2 and 3) and two potential RNA polymerase-sigma 54-binding sites (downstream promoter elements, DPEs 1 and 2). DPE2 is located 420 bp into the coding region and DPE1 overlaps UAS1 by 5 bp. Mutational and footprinting analyses have shown efficient activation of the nifJ promoter requires that NifA is bound at UAS 2 and 3. Transcription is initiated at DPE1. Only a weak interaction of NifA with the UAS overlapping DPE1 was detected. Footprints demonstrated that E sigma 54 forms a closed complex at DPE1 but not DPE2 and that bound E sigma 54 closely approaches the -15 region of DPE1. Stimulation of nifJ promoter activity by IHF was not as great as that observed for other nif promoters. In the absence of IHF nifH promoter sequences stimulated activation of the nifJ promoter. This appeared to require NifA bound at the nifH UAS. Thus, one additional role of IHF may be to partition NifA between the two promoters by constraining the topology of the DNA.

Positive and negative effects of DNA bending on activation of transcription from a distant site

Transcription of the Escherichia coli glnHPQ operon, which encodes components of the high-affinity glutamine transport system, is activated by nitrogen regulator I (NRI)-phosphate in response to nitrogen limitation. NRI-phosphate binds to sites upstream from the sigma 54-dependent glnHp2 promoter and activates transcription by catalyzing the isomerization of the closed sigma 54-RNA polymerase promoter complex to an open complex. On linear DNA, the initiation of glnHp2 transcription requires in addition to NRI-phosphate the presence of integration host factor (IHF), which binds to a site located between the NRI-binding sites and the promoter. On supercoiled DNA, IHF does not play an essential role, but enhances the activation of transcription by NRI-phosphate. We found that at a mutant glnHp2 promoter with increased affinity for sigma 54-RNA polymerase, the initiation of transcription can be activated equally well by NRI-phosphate in the presence or absence of IHF. Binding of IHF to its site does not increase the binding of sigma 54-RNA polymerase to the glnHp2 promoter; instead, our data suggest that IHF bends the DNA to align the activator with the closed sigma 54-RNA polymerase promoter complex to facilitate the interactions that result in open complex formation. In the absence of IHF, NRI-phosphate can activate transcription whether its binding sites are on the same face of the DNA helix as the sigma 54-RNA polymerase or on the opposite face. IHF enhances transcription when the three proteins are located on the same face of the helix, but strongly inhibits transcription when any one of the proteins is located on the opposite face.

Role of integration host factor in stimulating transcription from the sigma 54-dependent nifH promoter

In a wide variety of nitrogen-fixing organisms among the Purple Bacteria (large division of Gram-negative bacteria) the nitrogen fixation (nif) operons are transcribed by an alternative holoenzyme form of RNA polymerase, sigma 54-holoenzyme. Transcription depends on the activator protein NIFA (nitrogen fixation protein A), which catalyzes isomerization of closed complexes between this polymerase and a promoter to transcriptionally productive open complexes. NIFA-mediated activation of transcription from the nifH promoter of Klebsiella pneumoniae is greatly stimulated by the integration host factor IHF, which binds to a site between the upstream binding site for NIFA and the promoter, and bends the DNA. IHF fails to stimulate activation of transcription from this promoter by another activator of sigma 54-holoenzyme, NTRC (nitrogen regulatory protein C), which lacks a specific binding site in the nifH promoter region. As predicted, if the IHF-induced bend facilitates interaction between NIFA and sigma 54-holoenzyme, substitution of an NTRC-binding site for the NIFA-binding site allowed IHF to stimulate NTRC-mediated activation of transcription from the nifH promoter. The stimulation was of the same order of magnitude as that for NIFA in the native configuration of the promoter-regulatory region (up to 20-fold). With purified NTRC and the substitution construct we could demonstrate that stimulation by IHF in a purified transcription system was comparable to that in a crude coupled transcription-translation system, indicating that the stimulation in the crude system could be accounted for by IHF. The IHF stimulation was observed on linear as well as supercoiled templates, indicating that the geometric requirements are relatively simple. We have attempted to visualize the arrangement of proteins on DNA fragments carrying the nifH promoter-regulatory region of K. pneumoniae by electron microscopy. IHF stimulated NIFA-mediated activation of transcription from the nifH and nifD promoters of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and less so from the nifH promoters of Rhizobium meliloti and Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, consistent with previous observations that stimulation is greatest at promoters that are weak binding sites for sigma 54-holoenzyme in closed complexes.

Activator-independent formation of a closed complex between sigma 54-holoenzyme and nifH and nifU promoters of Klebsiella pneumoniae

The alternative sigma factor sigma 54 is required for transcription of nitrogen fixation genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other diazotrophs. The nif genes, and other E sigma 54-dependent genes whose products are necessary for a wide range of processes, are postively regulated. A unifying model that is well supported by studies on nif and other nitrogen-regulated (ntr) genes includes the central tenet that sigma 54 confers upon core RNA polymerase the ability to recognize and bind specific promoter sequences, but not the ability to isomerize to the open complex without assistance from the appropriate activator protein. Direct physical evidence for formation of an activator-independent complex between E sigma 54 and the NifA-dependent K. pneumoniae nifH and nifU promoters has, to date, been lacking. Using purified components we have now demonstrated formation of the closed complex at these promoters, indicating that it is an intermediate along the pathway to open complex formation. The closed complex was not detected when conserved features of the promoter were altered by mutation, nor was its stability increased when integration host factor protein was bound adjacent to the E sigma 54 recognition sequence.

Central domain of the positive control protein NifA and its role in transcriptional activation

The positive control protein NifA of Klebsiella pneumoniae activates transcription by RNA polymerase containing sigma 54 by catalysing open promoter complex formation. We show that the integrity of the putative ATP-binding pocket in the central domain of NifA is necessary for the positive control function of NifA, but is not required for DNA-binding or recognition of NifA by NifL. The inactive mutant NifA proteins are trans dominant to wild-type NifA and are unable to catalyse formation of open promoter complexes irrespective of whether a closed promoter complex at the nifH promoter has preformed. Formation of the closed complex results in a DNA structural distortion adjacent to the DNA region melted in the open promoter complex. This distortion lies at the leading edge of the E sigma 54 footprint. Although unable to catalyse open complex formation, some mutant NifAs altered the chemical reactivity of the distorted base-pair indicating that they retain the ability to recognize the closed promoter complex. The activation phenotype of partially active NifA molecules was sensitive to promoter sequences known to influence closed complex formation, indicating differences in (1) the susceptibility of the closed complexes towards activation and (2) their requirements for NifA during activation.

Upstream binding sequences of the XylR activator protein and integration host factor in the xylS gene promoter region of the Pseudomonas TOL plasmid

The xylR and xylS genes, which encode the positive regulators of the TOL plasmid catabolic pathways, are adjacent genes on the TOL plasmid and are transcribed from divergent promoters. Transcription from the xylS gene promoter, Ps, is positively regulated by effector-activated XylR protein and requires the specific RNA polymerase sigma 54 subunit (RpoN). Deletions and point mutations in the Ps upstream region localized the site of XylR interaction to the region between -133 bp and -207 bp (with respect to the transcriptional start of the xylS messenger), which contains an inverted sequence repeat largely homologous to the motif recognised by XylR in the XylR-regulated 'upper' catabolic pathway promoter, Pu. Gel retardation experiments showed binding of IHF to the Ps promoter region. Corresponding sequences showing good homology to the IHF-binding consensus were identified close to the Ps Promoter (between -35 bp and -47 bp, Ps proximal site) and further upstream overlapping the XylR recognition sequence (Ps distal site). In the latter case IHF recognition motifs were found well conserved on both strands at nearly the same position (between -140 bp and -152 bp on the upper and between -141 bp and -153 bp on the lower strand). Expression from Ps, either under inducing or non-inducing conditions, was, however, only slightly influenced by the absence of IHF in an IHF-deficient mutant and thus activation of Ps, like that of other sigma 54-dependent promoters which are rich in Ts, does not absolutely require IHF protein.

In vitro interactions of integration host factor with the ompF promoter-regulatory region of Escherichia coli

Previous work has shown that integration host factor (IHF) mutants have increased expression and altered osmoregulation of OmpF, a major Escherichia coli outer membrane protein. By in vitro analysis the possibility was investigated that IHF interacts directly with the ompF promoter region. Gel retardation assays and DNase I protection experiments showed that IHF binds to two sites in the ompF promoter region centered at positions -180 and -60 relative to the start of transcription. Gel electrophoresis studies with circularly permuted ompF promoter fragments indicated that IHF binding strongly increased a small intrinsic bend in the ompF promoter region. The addition of IHF to a purified in vitro transcription system strongly and specifically inhibited ompF transcription. This inhibition was reversed by increasing the concentration of OmpR, a positive activator required for ompF expression, suggesting that IHF may inhibit ompF transcription by altering how OmpR interacts with the ompF promoter.

The remote control of transcription, DNA looping and DNA compaction

mRNA synthesis can be controlled at some distance from the start of transcription in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. It is generally assumed that the distal elements of the transcriptional machinery directly interact with the proximal elements, forcing the DNA to bend in a loop. DNA loop formation and transcription can be affected by the distance between the sites, their helical positioning, their orientation, their concentration (responsible for a cis- or a trans-effect of the DNA sequences), and DNA compaction in chromatin. The corresponding in vitro and in vivo situations have been critically examined for a number of systems, mostly prokaryotic.

Integration host factor binds specifically to multiple sites in the ompB promoter of Escherichia coli and inhibits transcription

Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF) is a DNA-binding protein that participates in gene regulation, site-specific recombination, and other processes in E. coli and some of its bacteriophages and plasmids. In the present study, we showed that IHF is a direct negative effector of the ompB operon of E. coli. Gel retardation experiments and DNase I footprinting studies revealed that IHF binds to three sites in the ompB promoter region. In vitro transcription from ompB promoter fragments was specifically blocked by IHF. In vivo experiments showed that IHF is a negative effector of ompB expression in growing cells. Analysis of IHF binding site mutations strongly suggested that IHF binding in the ompB promoter region is necessary for the negative effects seen in vivo.

Control site location and transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli

The regulatory regions for 119 Escherichia coli promoters have been analyzed, and the locations of the regulatory sites have been cataloged. The following observations emerge. (i) More than 95% of promoters are coregulated with at least one other promoter. (ii) Virtually all sigma 70 promoters contain at least one regulatory site in a proximal position, touching at least position -65 with respect to the start point of transcription. There are not yet clear examples of upstream regulation in the absence of a proximal site. (iii) Operators within regulons appear in very variable proximal positions. By contrast, the proximal activation sites of regulons are much more fixed. (iv) There is a forbidden zone for activation elements downstream from approximately position -20 with respect to the start of transcription. By contrast, operators can occur throughout the proximal region. When activation elements appear in the forbidden zone, they repress. These latter examples usually involve autoregulation. (v) Approximately 40% of repressible promoters contain operator duplications. These occur either in certain regulons where duplication appears to be a requirement for repressor action or in promoters subject to complex regulation. (vi) Remote operator duplications occur in approximately 10% of repressible promoters. They generally appear when a multiple promoter region is coregulated by cyclic AMP receptor protein. (vii) Sigma 54 promoters do not require proximal or precisely positioned activator elements and are not generally subject to negative regulation. Rationales are presented for all of the above observations.

Organization and function of binding sites for the transcriptional activator NifA in the Klebsiella pneumoniae nifE and nifU promoters

The interaction of the Klebsiella pneumoniae NifA protein, a sigma 54-dependent activator, with the nifE and nifU promoters was analysed. At these promoters NifA established contacts in addition to those predicted by the minimal formulation NifA binding site (5'-TGT-N10-ACA). The positions of the contacts indicate that bound NifA molecules could assemble to form an oligomer. At both promoters contacts with NifA are made predominantly on one face of the DNA helix, and all contacts appear necessary for full activation by NifA. The close contacts made by NifA appear to be made by the DNA-binding domain of NifA. This domain shows specific DNA-binding activity in vitro. The binding of NifA to one site in the nifU promoter depends upon occupancy of additional upstream sequences by NifA. At the nifE promoter NifA binds adjacent to an integration host factor (IHF) binding site, but in contrast to results obtained with the nifU promoter IHF does not diminish nifE promoter occupancy by NifA. The IHF requirement for efficient in vivo activation of the nifU promoter by NifA was greater than that of the nifE promoter. Accordingly, the affinity of IHF for the nifU promoter is higher than for the nifE promoter. Amongst promoters utilizing the sigma 54 holoenzyme, the nifE promoter appears somewhat atypical in having the activator bound at around position -74 rather than the usual 100 base-pairs or more upstream from the transcription start site.

Influence of oxygen on DNA binding, positive control, and stability of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum NifA regulatory protein

Central to the genetic regulatory circuit that controls Bradyrhizobium japonicum nif and fix gene expression is the NifA protein. NifA activates transcription of several nif and fix genes and autoregulates its expression during symbiosis in soybean root nodules or in free-living microaerobic conditions. High O2 tensions result in the lack of nif expression, possibly by inactivation of NifA through oxidation of an essential metal cofactor. Several B. japonicum nif and fix promoters have upstream activator sequences (UAS) required for optimal activation. The UAS are located more than 100 bp from the -24/-12 promoter and have been proposed to be binding sites for NifA. We investigated the interaction of NifA with the nifD promoter region by using in vivo dimethyl sulfate footprinting. NifA-dependent protection from methylation of the two UAS of this promoter was detected. Footprinting experiments in the presence of rifampin showed that UAS-bound NifA led to the formation of an open nifD promoter-RNA polymerase sigma 54 complex. Shift to aerobic growth resulted in a rapid loss of protection of both the UAS and the promoter, indicating that the DNA-binding and the activation functions of NifA were controlled by the O2 status of the cell. After an almost complete inactivation by oxygen, the NifA protein began to degrade. Furthermore, metal deprivation also caused degradation of NifA. In this case, however, the rates of NifA inactivation and NifA degradation were not clearly distinguishable. The results are discussed in the light of a previously proposed model, according to which the oxidation state of a NifA-metal complex influences the conformation of NifA for both DNA-binding and positive control functions.

Expression of regulatory nif genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus

Translational fusions of the Escherichia coli lacZ gene to Rhodobacter capsulatus nif genes were constructed in order to determine the regulatory circuit of nif gene expression in R. capsulatus, a free-living photosynthetic diazotroph. The expression of nifH, nifA (copies I and II), and nifR4 was measured in different regulatory mutant strains under different physiological conditions. The expression of nifH and nifR4 (the analog of ntrA in Klebsiella pneumoniae) depends on the NIFR1/R2 system (the analog of the ntr system in K. pneumoniae), on NIFA, and on NIFR4. The expression of both copies of nifA is regulated by the NIFR1/R2 system and is modulated by the N source of the medium under anaerobic photosynthetic growth conditions. In the presence of ammonia or oxygen, moderate expression of nifA was detectable, whereas nifH and nifR4 were not expressed under these conditions. The implications for the regulatory circuit of nif gene expression in R. capsulatus are discussed and compared with the situation in K. pneumoniae, another free-living diazotroph.

Cotranscription of the electron transport protein genes nifJ and nifF in Enterobacter agglomerans 333

A nucleotide sequence showing extensive homology to the nifF gene, which codes for a flavodoxin involved in nitrogen fixation in Klebsiella pneumoniae, was localized on the plasmid pEA3 of Enterobacter agglomerans and determined. The analysis of transcriptional fusions, as well as transcript protection assays, indicated a novel nif gene organization, that is, the cotranscription of nifJ and nifF.

Purification of the regulatory protein AlgR1 and its binding in the far upstream region of the algD promoter in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

A regulatory protein AlgR1, previously suggested to be a member of a two-component sensory transduction system because of its homology to OmpR and NtrC and its ability to allow activation of the algD promoter under conditions of high osmolarity, has been hyperproduced in Escherichia coli after deletion of the upstream region including part of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence of the algR1 gene and its subsequent cloning under the tac promoter. The AlgR1 protein is purified as a monomer, and the sequence of the nine N-terminal amino acids of the monomer matches with that predicted from the DNA sequence of the algR1 gene. The purified AlgR1 protein binds to two separate DNA fragments of the algD upstream region. DNase protection experiments identify these two DNA segments as 14-mer sequences centered at -382 and -458 regions, which contain a common CCGT-TCGTC sequence in them. While the presence of at least one AlgR1 binding site is important for the activation of the algD promoter, the presence of both of the binding sites in the upstream region leads to a higher level of activation.

Role of integration host factor in the regulation of the glnHp2 promoter of Escherichia coli

The glnHPQ operon of Escherichia coli encodes components of the high-affinity glutamine transport system. One of the two promoters of this operon, glnHp2, is responsible for expression of the operon under nitrogen-limiting conditions. The general nitrogen regulatory protein (NRI) binds to two overlapping sites centered at -109 and -122 from the transcription start site and, when phosphorylated, activates transcription of glnHp2 by catalyzing isomerization of the closed sigma 54-RNA polymerase promoter complex to an open complex. The DNA-bending protein integration host factor (IHF) binds to a site immediately upstream of glnHp2 and enhances the activation of open complex formation by NRI phosphate. The NRI-binding sites can be moved several hundred base pairs further upstream without altering the ability of NRI phosphate to activate open complex formation. We propose that the IHF-induced bend can facilitate or obstruct the interaction between NRI phosphate and the closed complex depending on the relative positions of NRI phosphate and sigma 54-RNA polymerase on the DNA.

Transcriptional regulatory cascade of nitrogen-fixation genes in anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria: oxygen- and nitrogen-responsive factors

Many photosynthetic bacteria from aquatic and terrestrial habitats reduce atmospheric dinitrogen to ammonia. The synthesis of proteins required for nitrogen fixation in these microorganisms is repressed by fixed nitrogen or oxygen. Studies on the purple non-sulphur phototroph Rhodobacter capsulatus have helped to clarify this transcriptional control and to define the factors involved in this regulation. The molecular mechanisms by which the nitrogen and oxygen status of the cell are relayed into nif gene expression or repression involve many trans- and cis-acting factors. The roles of these factors in the nif regulatory cascade of R. capsulatus are summarized. Two levels of control are present. The first level of control involves the nitrogen sensing circuitry in which at least four proteins act in a cascade. Upon nitrogen deficiency, genes involved in the second level of control are transcriptionally activated. These genes encode regulatory proteins that subsequently activate transcription of all other nif genes under anaerobic conditions. The R. capsulatus cascade is compared to the nif regulatory cascade in Klebsiella pneumoniae, highlighting both common and unique aspects.