Nucleosome positioning properties of the albumin transcriptional enhancer

Cryo-EM structure of the nucleosome containing the ALB1 enhancer DNA sequence

Pioneer transcription factors specifically target their recognition DNA sequences within nucleosomes. FoxA is the pioneer transcription factor that binds to the ALB1 gene enhancer in liver precursor cells, and is required for liver differentiation in embryos. The ALB1 enhancer DNA sequence is reportedly incorporated into nucleosomes in cells, although the nucleosome structure containing the targeting sites for FoxA has not been clarified yet. In this study, we determined the nucleosome structure containing the ALB1 enhancer (N1) sequence, by cryogenic electron microscopy at 4.0 Å resolution. The nucleosome structure with the ALB1 enhancer DNA is not significantly different from the previously reported nucleosome structure with the Widom 601 DNA. Interestingly, in the nucleosomes, the ALB1 enhancer DNA contains local flexible regions, as compared to the Widom 601 DNA. Consistently, DNaseI treatments revealed that, in the nucleosome, the ALB1 enhancer (N1) DNA is more accessible than the Widom 601 sequence. The histones also associated less strongly with the ALB1 enhancer (N1) DNA than the Widom 601 DNA in the nucleosome. Therefore, the local histone–DNA contacts may be responsible for the enhanced DNA accessibility in the nucleosome with the ALB1 enhancer DNA.

Genetic determinants and epigenetic effects of pioneer-factor occupancy

Transcription factors are the core drivers of gene regulatory networks that control developmental transitions, therefore a more complete understanding of how they access, alter and maintain tissue-specific gene expression patterns remains an important goal. To systematically dissect molecular components that enable or constrain their activity, we investigated the genomic occupancy of FOXA2, GATA4 and OCT4 in several cell types. Despite a classification as pioneer factors, all three factors demonstrate cell type specific enrichment even under super-physiological expression. However, only FOXA2 and GATA4 display, in both endogenous and ectopic conditions, a low enrichment sampling of additional loci that are occupied in alternative cell types. Co-factor expression can lead to increased pioneer factor binding at subsets of previously sampled target sites. Finally, we demonstrate that FOXA2 occupancy and changes to DNA accessibility at silent cis-regulatory elements can occur when the cell cycle is halted in G1, but subsequent loss of DNA methylation requires DNA replication.

Prediction of nucleosome positioning by the incorporation of frequencies and distributions of three different nucleotide segment lengths into a general pseudo k-tuple nucleotide composition

Motivation

Nucleosome positioning plays important roles in many eukaryotic intranuclear processes, such as transcriptional regulation and chromatin structure formation. The investigations of nucleosome positioning rules provide a deeper understanding of these intracellular processes.

Results

Nucleosome positioning prediction was performed using a model consisting of three types of variables characterizing a DNA sequence—the number of five-nucleotide sequences, the number of three-nucleotide combinations in one period of a helix, and mono- and di-nucleotide distributions in DNA fragments. Using recently proposed stringent benchmark datasets with low biases for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Homo sapiens, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster, the present model was shown to have a better prediction performance than the recently proposed predictors. This model was able to display the common and organism-dependent factors that affect nucleosome forming and inhibiting sequences as well. Therefore, the predictors developed here can accurately predict nucleosome positioning and help determine the key factors influencing this process.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Genome-wide analysis reveals positional-nucleosome-oriented binding pattern of pioneer factor FOXA1

The compaction of nucleosomal structures creates a barrier for DNA-binding transcription factors (TFs) to access their cognate cis-regulatory elements. Pioneer factors (PFs) such as FOXA1 are able to directly access these cis-targets within compact chromatin. However, how these PFs interplay with nucleosomes remains to be elucidated, and is critical for us to understand the underlying mechanism of gene regulation. Here, we have conducted a computational analysis on a strand-specific paired-end ChIP-exo (termed as ChIP-ePENS) data of FOXA1 in LNCaP cells by our novel algorithm ePEST. We find that FOXA1 chromatin binding occurs via four distinct border modes (or footprint boundary patterns), with a preferential footprint boundary patterns relative to FOXA1 motif orientation. In addition, from this analysis three fundamental nucleotide positions (oG, oS and oH) emerged as major determinants for blocking exo-digestion and forming these four distinct border modes. By integrating histone MNase-seq data, we found an astonishingly consistent, ‘well-positioned’ configuration occurs between FOXA1 motifs and dyads of nucleosomes genome-wide. We further performed ChIP-seq of eight chromatin remodelers and found an increased occupancy of these remodelers on FOXA1 motifs for all four border modes (or footprint boundary patterns), indicating the full occupancy of FOXA1 complex on the three blocking sites (oG, oS and oH) likely produces an active regulatory status with well-positioned phasing for protein binding events. Together, our results suggest a positional-nucleosome-oriented accessing model for PFs seeking target motifs, in which FOXA1 can examine each underlying DNA nucleotide and is able to sense all potential motifs regardless of whether they face inward or outward from histone octamers along the DNA helix axis.

Pioneer transcription factors in cell reprogramming

Biochemical and genomic studies have shown that transcription factors with the highest reprogramming activity often have the special ability to engage their target sites on nucleosomal DNA, thus behaving as “pioneer factors” to initiate events in closed chromatin. This review by Iwafuchi-Doi and Zaret focuses on the most recent studies of pioneer factors in cell programming and reprogramming, how pioneer factors have special chromatin-binding properties, and facilitators and impediments to chromatin binding.

A subset of eukaryotic transcription factors possesses the remarkable ability to reprogram one type of cell into another. The transcription factors that reprogram cell fate are invariably those that are crucial for the initial cell programming in embryonic development. To elicit cell programming or reprogramming, transcription factors must be able to engage genes that are developmentally silenced and inappropriate for expression in the original cell. Developmentally silenced genes are typically embedded in “closed” chromatin that is covered by nucleosomes and not hypersensitive to nuclease probes such as DNase I. Biochemical and genomic studies have shown that transcription factors with the highest reprogramming activity often have the special ability to engage their target sites on nucleosomal DNA, thus behaving as “pioneer factors” to initiate events in closed chromatin. Other reprogramming factors appear dependent on pioneer factors for engaging nucleosomes and closed chromatin. However, certain genomic domains in which nucleosomes are occluded by higher-order chromatin structures, such as in heterochromatin, are resistant to pioneer factor binding. Understanding the means by which pioneer factors can engage closed chromatin and how heterochromatin can prevent such binding promises to advance our ability to reprogram cell fates at will and is the topic of this review.

Isolation, characterization, and differentiation of thy1.1-sorted pancreatic adult progenitor cell populations

We have isolated a novel progenitor cell population from adult rat pancreatic ducts, termed pancreatic-derived progenitor cells (PDPCs). Here, we report the in vitro culture, selection, and characterization of Thy1.1-positive and Thy1.1-negative PDPC subpopulations. These cells exhibit bipotentiality for differentiation into both pancreatic and hepatic cell types. Significantly, they express Pdx-1. Using a serum-free FGF-4-containing differentiation protocol, we have observed a time course of both morphological and gene expression changes indicative of hepatic lineage differentiation for the Thy1.1-positive subpopulation. These cells express albumin and store glycogen, typical features of mature hepatocytes. The Thy1.1-positive subpopulation could also readily be induced to differentiate into a pancreatic lineage with characteristic morphological changes resulting in three-dimensional islet-like structures and the transcriptional expression of insulin and glucagon in addition to Pdx-1. No morphological evidence of islet-like clusters was observed using the Thy1.1-negative population. However, Thy1.1-negative cells grown in pancreatic differentiation medium did show insulin gene transcription. Glucagon was not expressed in the undifferentiated Thy1.1-negative cells, nor was it induced in vitro after differentiation. The detection of Pdx-1 transcriptional expression in both populations indicates their potential as a novel source of non-beta-cell-derived insulin.

Stable chromatin binding prevents FoxA acetylation, preserving FoxA chromatin remodeling

FoxA1-3 (formerly HNF3alpha, -beta, and -gamma), members of the FoxA subfamily of forkhead transcription factors, function as initial chromatin-binding and chromatin-remodeling factors in a variety of tissues, including liver and pancreas. Despite essential roles in development and metabolism, regulation of FoxA factors is not well understood. This study examines a potential role for acetylation in the regulation of FoxA chromatin binding and remodeling. Using in silico analysis, we have identified 11 putative p300 acetylation sites within FoxA1, five of which are located within wings 1 and 2 of its winged-helix DNA-binding domain. These polypeptide structures stabilize FoxA DNA and chromatin binding, and we have demonstrated that acetylation attenuates FoxA binding to DNA and diminishes its ability to remodel chromatin. FoxA acetylation is inhibited by chromatin binding. We propose a model whereby stable chromatin binding protects the FoxA DNA-binding domain from acetylation to preserve chromatin binding and remodeling by FoxA factors in the absence of extracellular cues.

Multiple sequence-directed possibilities provide a pool of nucleosome position choices in different states of activity of a gene

BACKGROUND

Genome-wide mappings of nucleosome occupancy in different species have shown presence of well-positioned nucleosomes. While the DNA sequences may help decide their locations, the observed positions in vivo are end-results of chromatin remodeling, the state of gene activity and binding of the sequence-specific factors to the DNA, all of which influence nucleosome positions. Thus, the observed nucleosome locations in vivo do not reflect the true contribution of DNA sequence to the mapped position. Moreover, the naturally occurring nucleosome-positioning sequences are known to guide multiple translational positionings.

RESULTS

We show that yeast SNR6, a gene transcribed by RNA polymerase III, constitutes nucleosome-positioning sequence. In the absence of a chromatin remodeler or any factor binding, the gene sequence confers a unique rotational phase to nucleosomes in the gene region, and directs assembly of several translationally positioned nucleosomes on approximately 1.2 kb DNA from the gene locus, including the short approximately 250 bp gene region. Mapping of all these gene sequence-directed nucleosome positions revealed that the array of nucleosomes in the gene upstream region occupy the same positions as those observed in vivo but the nucleosomes on the gene region can be arranged in three distinct registers. Two of these arrangements differ from each other in the position of only one nucleosome, and match with the nucleosome positions on the gene in repressed and active states in vivo, where the gene-specific factor is known to occupy the gene in both the states. The two positions are interchanged by an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler in vivo. The third register represents the positions which block the access of the factor to the gene promoter elements.

CONCLUSION

On a gene locus, multiple nucleosome positions are directed by a gene sequence to provide a pool of possibilities, out of which the preferred ones are selected by the chromatin remodeler and transcription factor of the gene under different states of activity of the gene.

Transcription factor interactions and chromatin modifications associated with p53-mediated, developmental repression of the alpha-fetoprotein gene

We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analyses of developmentally staged solid tissues isolated from wild-type and p53-null mice to determine specific histone N-terminal modifications, histone-modifying proteins, and transcription factor interactions at the developmental repressor region (-850) and core promoter of the hepatic tumor marker alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) gene. Both repression of AFP during liver development and silencing in the brain, where AFP is never expressed, are associated with dimethylation of histone H3 lysine 9 (DiMetH3K9) and the presence of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1). These heterochromatic markers remain localized to AFP during developmental repression but spread to the upstream albumin gene during silencing. Developmentally regulated decreases in levels of acetylated H3 (AcH3K9) and H4 (AcH4) and of di- and trimethylated H3K4 (DiMetH3K4 and TriMetH3K4) occur at both the core promoter and distal repressor regions of AFP. Hepatic expression of AFP correlates with FoxA interaction at the repressor region and the binding of RNA polymerase II and TATA-binding protein to the core promoter. p53 acts as a developmental repressor of AFP in the liver by binding to chromatin, excluding FoxA interaction and targeting mSin3A/HDAC1 to the distal repressor region. p53-null mice exhibit developmentally delayed AFP repression, concomitant with acetylation of H3K9, methylation of H3K4, and loss of DiMetH3K9, mSin3A/HDAC1, and HP1 interactions.

What positions nucleosomes?--A model

Here we propose a new determinant for localization of nucleosomes along genomic DNA, in addition to sequence-dependent features. The new specific class of chromatin scaling signals involves curved DNA. According to the observed positional distribution of DNA curvature, the new synchronizing signal occurs once per four nucleosomes on average. This new factor in nucleosome positioning should substantially influence the efficiency of biological reactions through regulatory factors microscopically and the entire chromatin structure through the 30 nm fiber structure macroscopically. Allocation of the new type of signals is found to be fixed evolutionarily although they could be shifted in accordance with the hierarchy of functional genomic structures.

Identification of factors mediating the developmental regulation of the early acting -3.9 kb chicken lysozyme enhancer element

The chicken lysozyme gene -3.9 kb enhancer forms a DNase I hypersensitive site (DHS) early in macrophage differentiation, but not in more primitive multipotent myeloid precursor cells. A nucleosome becomes precisely positioned across the enhancer in parallel with DHS formation. In transfection assays, the 5'-part of the -3.9 kb element has ubiquitous enhancer activity. The 3'-part has no stimulatory activity, but is necessary for enhancer repression in lysozyme non-expressing cells. Recent studies have shown that the chromatin fine structure of this region is affected by inhibition of histone deacetylase activity after Trichostatin A (TSA) treatment, but only in lysozyme non-expressing cells. These results indicated a developmental modification of chromatin structure from a dynamic, but inactive, to a stabilised, possibly hyperacetylated, active state. Here we have identified positively and negatively acting transcription factors binding to the -3.9 kb enhancer and determined their contribution to enhancer activity. Furthermore, we examined the influence of TSA treatment on enhancer activity in macrophage cells and lysozyme non-expressing cells, including multipotent macrophage precursors. Interestingly, TSA treatment was able to restore enhancer activity fully in macrophage precursor cells, but not in non-macrophage lineage cells. These results suggest (i) that the transcription factor complement of multipotent progenitor cells is similar to that of lysozyme-expressing cells and (ii) that developmental regulation of the -3.9 kb enhancer is mediated by the interplay of repressing and activating factors that respond to or initiate changes in the chromatin acetylation state.

Origin recognition complex binding to a metazoan replication origin

The initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells at the onset of S phase requires the origin recognition complex (ORC) [1]. This six-subunit complex, first isolated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [2], is evolutionarily conserved [1]. ORC participates in the formation of the prereplicative complex [3], which is necessary to establish replication competence. The ORC-DNA interaction is well established for autonomously replicating sequence (ARS) elements in yeast in which the ARS consensus sequence [4] (ACS) constitutes part of the ORC binding site [2, 5]. Little is known about the ORC-DNA interaction in metazoa. For the Drosophila chorion locus, it has been suggested that ORC binding is dispersed [6]. We have analyzed the amplification origin (ori) II/9A of the fly, Sciara coprophila. We identified a distinct 80-base pair (bp) ORC binding site and mapped the replication start site located adjacent to it. The binding of ORC to this 80-bp core region is ATP dependent and is necessary to establish further interaction with an additional 65-bp of DNA. This is the first time that both the ORC binding site and the replication start site have been identified in a metazoan amplification origin. Thus, our findings extend the paradigm from yeast ARS1 to multicellular eukaryotes, implicating ORC as a determinant of the position of replication initiation.

Changes in DNA loop domain structure during spermatogenesis and embryogenesis in the Syrian golden hamster

The DNA in eukaryotic cells is organized into loop domains that are 25 to 100 kilobases long and attached at their bases to the nuclear matrix. This organization plays major roles in DNA replication and transcription. We examined changes in DNA loop structure of the 5S rDNA gene cluster in the Syrian golden hamster as a function of cellular differentiation by direct visualization with fluorescent in situ hybridization. The 5S rDNA cluster is large enough to encompass more than one loop domain but small enough that individual loop domains can still be resolved. We found that the sizes of the 5S rDNA loops are much smaller, and that the numbers of loops per locus are larger, in all pluripotent cell types than they are in adult somatic tissue. Within the pluripotent spermatogenic cell lineage, the loop domain organization was cell specific. The loop size decreased during the early stages of spermatogenesis but did not change during spermiogenesis, suggesting that DNA loop structure is independent of the chromatin condensation that occurs when protamines replace histones. In early embryonic cells, the loop structure remained small, but in differentiated somatic cells, it became much larger. We suggest that these changes in the 5S rDNA loop domain structure may be related to the maintenance or loss of developmental potential.

A unique combination of transcription factors controls differentiation of thyroid cells

The thyroid follicular cell type is devoted to the synthesis of thyroid hormones. Several genes, whose protein products are essential for efficient hormone biosynthesis, are uniquely expressed in this cell type. A set of transcriptional regulators, unique to the thyroid follicular cell type, has been identified as responsible for thyroid specific gene expression; it comprises three transcription factors, named TTF-1, TTF-2, and Pax8, each of which is expressed also in cell types different from the thyroid follicular cells. However, the combination of these factors is unique to the thyroid hormone producing cells, strongly suggesting that they play an important role in differentiation of these cells. An overview of the molecular and biological features of these transcription factors is presented here. Data demonstrating that all three play also an important role in early thyroid development, at stages preceding expression of the differentiated phenotype, are also reviewed. The wide temporal expression, from the beginning of thyroid organogenesis to the adult state, is suggestive of a recycling of the thyroid-specific transcription factors, that is, the control of different sets of target genes at diverse developmental stages. The identification of molecular mechanisms leading to specific gene expression in thyroid cells renders this cell type an interesting model in which to address several aspects of cell differentiation and organogenesis.

Distant enhancers stimulate the albumin promoter through complex proximal binding sites

The albumin-alpha-fetoprotein locus epitomizes the main features of transcriptional regulation of fetal and adult hepatocyte-specific genes: developmentally regulated promoters and strong distant enhancers. Full enhancer activity required only a proximal albumin-promoter region containing the TATA box, hepatic nuclear factor 1 (HNF1), and nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) sites. Deletion of the HNF1 site abrogated enhancer and promoter activity, whereas methylation of the site reduced all activity by about 3-fold. Deletion of the NF-Y site attenuated activity by about half, but much of the activity could be replaced by juxtaposition of an upstream region (designated distal element IV). Gel shift and competition analysis demonstrated that binding of architectural factors overlapped NF-Y binding. Moreover, a mutation that eliminated NF-Y binding but only minimally perturbed the surrounding region did not affect enhancer function. In plasmids with a second promoter, the enhancers simultaneously stimulated both albumin and alpha-fetoprotein promoters with minimal competition, but surprisingly some mutations in the albumin promoter attenuated expression from both promoters, whereas another uncoupled their expression. With single promoters, the function of the proximal promoter region was controlled by three parameters in the following hierarchy: HNF1 binding > local architecture > NF-Y binding, but integrated two-promoter function had a much greater dependence on NF-Y.

Domina (Dom), a new Drosophila member of the FKH/WH gene family, affects morphogenesis and is a suppressor of position-effect variegation

Domina (Dom) is a novel member of the FKH/WH transcription factor gene family of Drosophila. Two alternatively polyadenylated Dom transcripts of 2.9 and 3.9 kb encode a 719-amino-acid protein with a FKH/WH domain and a putative acidic transactivation domain. Dom is mainly expressed in the central and peripheral nervous system. Homozygous mutants show rough eyes, irregular arrangement of bristles, extended wings, defective posterior wing margins, and a severely diminished vitality and fertility. Heterozygous Dom flies are morphologically wild type but show suppression of position-effect variegation. Consistently with this chromatin effect DOM protein is accumulated in the chromocenter and, as expected from a transcription factor, is found at specific euchromatic loci. Sequence comparison suggests that DOM of Drosophila is homologous to the chordate WHN proteins. The chromatin modifying capability of DOM is probably based on the FKH/WH domain, which shows a remarkable structural similarity to the winged-helix structures of H1 and the central globular domain of H5.

An early developmental transcription factor complex that is more stable on nucleosome core particles than on free DNA

In vivo footprinting studies have shown that transcription factor binding sites for HNF3 and GATA-4 are occupied on the albumin gene enhancer in embryonic endoderm, prior to the developmental activation of liver gene transcription. We have investigated how these factors can stably occupy silent chromatin. Remarkably, we find that HNF3, but not GATA-4 or a GAL4 control protein, binds far more stably to nucleosome core particles than to free DNA. In the presence of HNF3, GATA-4 binds stably to an HNF3-positioned nucleosome. Histone acetylation does not affect HNF3 binding. This is evidence for stable nucleosome binding by a transcription factor and shows that a winged helix protein is sufficient to initiate the assembly of an enhancer complex on nonacetylated nucleosomes.

Long-distance chromatin mechanisms controlling tissue-specific gene locus activation

Several different types of regulatory mechanisms contribute to the tissue- and development-specific regulation of a gene. It is now well established that, in addition to promoters, upstream cis-regulatory elements, which bind a variety of trans-acting factors, are essential for correct gene activation. In the last few years, however, it has become evident that the chromatin structure of eukaryotic genes is an important additional regulatory layer that is essential for correct gene expression during development. Chromatin is essentially a repressive environment for transcription factors; hence, much effort in recent years has been devoted to the elucidation of how these repressive forces are overcome during the process of gene locus activation. A particular interesting question in this context is: what are the molecular mechanisms by which extensive regions of chromatin, in many cases far outside the coding region, are reorganized during development? In this review, I summarize data from recent investigations that have uncovered a surprising variety of factors involved in this process.

Specific binding of high-mobility-group I (HMGI) protein and histone H1 to the upstream AT-rich region of the murine beta interferon promoter: HMGI protein acts as a potential antirepressor of the promoter

The high-mobility-group I (HMGI) protein is a nonhistone component of active chromatin. In this work, we demonstrate that HMGI protein specifically binds to the AT-rich region of the murine beta interferon (IFN-beta) promoter localized upstream of the murine virus-responsive element (VRE). Contrary to what has been described for the human promoter, HMGI protein did not specifically bind to the VRE of the murine IFN-beta promoter. Stably transfected promoters carrying mutations on this HMGI binding site displayed delayed virus-induced kinetics of transcription. When integrated into chromatin, the mutated promoter remained repressed and never reached normal transcriptional activity. Such a phenomenon was not observed with transiently transfected promoters upon which chromatin was only partially reconstituted. Using UV footprinting, we show that the upstream AT-rich sequences of the murine IFN-beta promoter constitute a preferential binding region for histone H1. Transfection with a plasmid carrying scaffold attachment regions as well as incubation with distamycin led to the derepression of the IFN-beta promoter stably integrated into chromatin. In vitro, HMGI protein was able to displace histone H1 from the upstream AT-rich region of the wild-type promoter but not from the promoter carrying mutations on the upstream high-affinity HMGI binding site. Our results suggest that the binding of histone H1 to the upstream AT-rich region of the promoter might be partly responsible for the constitutive repression of the promoter. The displacement by HMGI protein of histone H1 could help to convert the IFN-beta promoter from a repressed to an active state.

Identification of a novel cis-acting element for fibroblast-specific transcription of the FSP1 gene

The FSP1 gene encodes a filament-binding S100 protein with paired EF hands that is specifically expressed in fibroblasts. This led us to look for cis-acting elements in the FSP1 promoter that might engage nuclear transcription factors unique to fibroblasts. The first exon of FSP1 is noncoding, therefore, a series of luciferase reporter minigenes were created containing varying lengths of 5'-flanking sequence, the first intron, and the noncoding region of the second exon. A position and promoter-dependent proximal element between -187 and -88 bp was shown to be active in fibroblasts but not in epithelium. Sequence in the first intron from +777 to +964 had an enhancing effect that was not cell type specific. Hsv TK reporter constructs driven by this promoter/intron cassette in transgenic mice were coexpressed appropriately with FSP1 in tissue fibroblasts. Gel mobility shift competitor assays identified a novel domain, FTS-1 (fibroblast transcription site-1; TTGAT from -177 to -173 bp), that specifically interacts with nuclear extracts from fibroblasts. The necessity of this binding site was confirmed by site-specific mutagenesis. Database searches also turned up putative FTS-1 sites in the early promoter regions of other fibroblast expressed proteins, including the alpha1 and alpha2(I), and alpha1(III) collagens and the alphaSM-actin gene. We hypothesize that the selective engagement of FTS-1 elements may contribute to the mesenchymal phenotype of fibroblasts and perhaps other dedifferentiated cells.

Role of histone H1 as an architectural determinant of chromatin structure and as a specific repressor of transcription on Xenopus oocyte 5S rRNA genes

We explore the role of histone H1 as a DNA sequence-dependent architectural determinant of chromatin structure and of transcriptional activity in chromatin. The Xenopus laevis oocyte- and somatic-type 5S rRNA genes are differentially transcribed in embryonic chromosomes in vivo depending on the incorporation of somatic histone H1 into chromatin. We establish that this effect can be reconstructed at the level of a single nucleosome. H1 selectively represses oocyte-type 5S rRNA genes by directing the stable positioning of a nucleosome such that transcription factors cannot bind to the gene. This effect does not occur on the somatic-type genes. Histone H1 binds to the 5' end of the nucleosome core on the somatic 5S rRNA gene, leaving key regulatory elements in the promoter accessible, while histone H1 binds to the 3' end of the nucleosome core on the oocyte 5S rRNA genes, specifically blocking access to a key promoter element (the C box). TFIIIA can bind to the somatic 5S rRNA gene assembled into a nucleosome in the presence of H1. Because H1 binds with equivalent affinities to nucleosomes containing either gene, we establish that it is the sequence-selective assembly of a specific repressive chromatin structure on the oocyte 5S rRNA genes that accounts for differential transcriptional repression. Thus, general components of chromatin can determine the assembly of specific regulatory nucleoprotein complexes.

Binding of the winged-helix transcription factor HNF3 to a linker histone site on the nucleosome

The transcription factor HNF3 and linker histones H1 and H5 possess winged-helix DNA-binding domains, yet HNF3 and other fork head-related proteins activate genes during development whereas linker histones compact DNA in chromatin and repress gene expression. We compared how the two classes of factors interact with chromatin templates and found that HNF3 binds DNA at the side of nucleosome cores, similarly to what has been reported for linker histone. A nucleosome structural binding site for HNF3 is occupied at the albumin transcriptional enhancer in active and potentially active chromatin, but not in inactive chromatin in vivo. While wild-type HNF3 protein does not compact DNA extending from the nucleosome, as does linker histone, site-directed mutants of HNF3 can compact nucleosomal DNA if they contain basic amino acids at positions previously shown to be essential for nucleosomal DNA compaction by linker histones. The results illustrate how transcription factors can possess special nucleosome-binding activities that are not predicted from studies of factor interactions with free DNA.

Nucleosome positioning by the winged helix transcription factor HNF3

Nucleosome positioning at genetic regulatory sequences is not well understood. The transcriptional enhancer of the mouse serum albumin gene is active in liver, where regulatory factors occupy their target sites on three nucleosome-like particles designated N1, N2, and N3. The winged helix transcription factor HNF3 binds to two sites near the center of the N1 particle. We created dinucleosome templates using the albumin enhancer sequence and found that site-specific binding of HNF3 protein resulted in nucleosome positioning in vitro similar to that seen in liver nuclei. Thus, binding of a transcription factor can position an underlying nucleosome core.

Nucleosome positioning and periodicity of satellite DNA in the liver of aging rats. Nucleosome positioning and periodicity of satellite DNA

The positioning of nucleosomes has been analysed by comparing the pattern of cutting sites of a probing reagent on chromatin and naked DNA. For this purpose, high molecular weight DNA and nuclei from the liver of young (18 +/- 2 weeks) and old (100 +/- 5 weeks) Wistar male rats were digested with micrococcal nuclease (MNase) and hybridized with 32P-labelled rat satellite DNA probe. A comparison of the ladder generated by MNase with chromatin and nuclei indicates long range organization of the satellite chromatin fiber with distinct non-random positioning of nucleosomes. However, the positioning of nucleosomes on satellite DNA does not vary with age. For studying the periodicity and subunit structure of satellite DNA, high molecular weight DNA from the liver of young and old rats were digested with different restriction enzymes. Surprisingly, no noteworthy age-related change is visible in the periodicity and subunit structural organization of the satellite DNA. These results suggest that the nucleosome positioning and the periodicity of liver satellite DNA do not vary with age.

The developmental activation of the chicken lysozyme locus in transgenic mice requires the interaction of a subset of enhancer elements with the promoter

The complete chicken lysozyme locus is expressed in a position independent fashion in macrophages of transgenic mice and forms the identical chromatin structure as observed with the endogenous gene in chicken cells. Individual lysozyme cis -regulatory elements reorganize their chromatin structure at different developmental stages. Accordingly, their activities are developmentally regulated, indicating a differential role of these elements in locus activation. We have shown previously that a subset of enhancer elements and the promoter are sufficient to activate transcription of the chicken lysozyme gene at the correct developmental stage. Here, we analyzed to which grade the developmentally controlled chromatin reorganizing capacity of cis -regulatory elements in the 5'-region of the chicken lysozyme locus is dependent on promoter elements, and we examined whether the lysozyme locus carries a dominant chromatin reorganizing element. To this end we generated transgenic mouse lines carrying constructs with a deletion of the lysozyme promoter. Expression of the transgene in macrophages is abolished, however, the chromatin reorganizing ability of the cis -regulatory elements is differentially impaired. Some cis -elements require the interaction with the promoter to stabilize transcription factor complexes detectable as DNase I hypersensitive sites in chromatin, whereas other elements reorganize their chromatin structure autonomously.

TTF-2, a new forkhead protein, shows a temporal expression in the developing thyroid which is consistent with a role in controlling the onset of differentiation

Expression of thyroglobulin (Tg) and thyroperoxidase (TPO) genes in thyroid follicular cells occurs in the mouse at embryonic day (E)14.5. Two transcription factors, TTF-1 and Pax-8, have been implicated in transcriptional activation of Tg and TPO, even though the onset of their expression is at E9.5, suggesting that additional events are necessary for transcriptional activation of Tg and TPO genes. We report in this paper the cloning of TTF-2, a DNA binding protein that recognizes sites on both Tg and TPO promoters. TTF-2 is a new forkhead domain-containing protein whose expression is restricted to the endodermal lining of the foregut and to the ectoderm that will give rise to the anterior pituitary. TTF-2 shows transient expression in the developing thyroid and anterior pituitary. In the thyroid, TTF-2 expression is down-regulated just before the onset of Tg and TPO gene expression, suggesting that this transcription factor plays the role in development of a negative controller of thyroid-specific gene expression.

Histone-like transcription factors in eukaryotes

Histone proteins have long been recognized as important regulators of eukaryotic gene expression. Condensation of DNA into chromatin by the core (H2A, H2B, H3, H4) and linker (H1, H5) histones effectively represses transcription initiation from the promoters of genes that have been packaged. Recently, eukaryotic transcriptional activators and coactivators (both positive and negative) resembling core and linker histone proteins have been discovered. Substantial progress has been made on structural and mechanistic studies of histones and histone-like transcription factors. Three-dimensional structures solved include the core histone octamer, an archael histone homodimer, two core histone-like subunits of transcription factor IID, a linker histone, and a linker histone-like transcriptional activator.