Acetate-free biofiltration versus bicarbonate haemodialysis in the treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy: a cross-over multicentric study

The Nephrologist's Role in the Collaborative Multi-Specialist Network Taking Care of Patients with Diabetes on Maintenance Hemodialysis: An Overview

Diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of renal failure in incident dialysis patients in several countries around the world. The quality of life for patients with diabetes in maintenance hemodialysis (HD) treatment is in general poor due to disease complications. Nephrologists have to cope with all these problems because of the “total care model” and strive to improve their patients’ outcome. In this review, an updated overview of the aspects the nephrologist must face in the management of these patients is reported. The conventional marker of glycemic control, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), is unreliable. HD itself may be responsible for dangerous hypoglycemic events. New methods of glucose control could be used even during dialysis, such as a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. The pharmacological control of diabetes is another complex topic. Because of the risk of hypoglycemia, insulin and other medications used to treat diabetes may need dose adjustment. The new class of antidiabetic drugs dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors can safely be used in non-insulin-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Nephrologists should take care to improve the hemodynamic tolerance to HD treatment, frequently compromised by the high level of ultrafiltration needed to counter high interdialytic weight gain. Kidney and pancreas transplantation, in selected patients with diabetes, is the best therapy and is the only approach able to free patients from both dialysis and insulin therapy.

Acetate-free, citrate-acidified bicarbonate dialysis improves serum calcification propensity-a preliminary study

Background

A novel in vitro test (T50 test) assesses ex vivo serum calcification propensity and predicts mortality in chronic kidney disease and haemodialysis (HD) patients. For the latter, a time-dependent decline of T50 was shown to relate to mortality. Here we assessed whether a 3-month switch to acetate-free, citrate-acidified, standard bicarbonate HD (CiaHD) sustainably improves calcification propensity.

Methods

T50 values were assessed in paired midweek pre-dialysis sera collected before and 3 months after CiaHD in 78 prevalent European HD patients. In all, 44 were then switched back to acetate. Partial correlation was used to study associations of changing T50 and changing covariates. Linear mixed effect models were built to assess the association of CiaHD and covariates with changing T50.

Results

A significant intra-individual increase of serum calcification resilience was found after 3 months on CiaHD (206  ±  56 to 242  ±  56 min; P < 0.001), but not after switching back to acetate (252  ±  63 to 243  ±  64 min; n = 44; P = 0.29). CiaHD, Δ serum phosphate and Δ albumin but not Δ ionized calcium and magnesium were the strongest determinants of changing T50. Beneath T50, only serum albumin but not phosphate changed significantly during 3 months of CiaHD.

Conclusion

CiaHD dialysis favourably affected calcification propensity as measured by the T50 test. Whether this treatment, beyond established phosphate-directed treatments, has the potential to sustainably tip the balance towards a more anti-calcific serum milieu needs to be further investigated.

The Influence of Different Glucose Concentrations in Haemodialysis Solutions on Metabolism and Blood Pressure Stability in Diabetic Patients

In recent years the percentage of diabetic patients on haemodialysis has increased. Considering the high frequency of intradialytic hypotensive and hypoglycaemic episodes experienced by these patients, it was the aim of the present study to evaluate the influence of different dialysate glucose concentrations (5.5 mmol/L or 11 mmol/L) on blood pressure and glycaemic regulation, using special dialysis equipment - the GENIUS® System.

This cross-over, prospective and randomised study, total duration 14 weeks, included 20 diabetic patients on maintenance haemodialysis. Group 1: 9 patients dialysed using dialysate with a glucose concentration of 5.5 mmol/L and after 7 weeks switched to dialysate with a glucose concentration of 11 mmol/L. Group 2: vice versa.

Results show a statistically higher number of patients with hypoglycaemic and hypotensive episodes using dialysate with a 5.5 mmol/L glucose concentration. Also, mean serum glucose values were higher during haemodialysis sessions with a glucose dialysate concentration of 11 mmol/L. There were no statistical differences between the groups in laboratory values, HbA1C, insulin doses or in anthropometric parameters.

Our results suggest that fewer diabetic patients undergoing haemodialysis using a higher dialysate glucose concentration of 11 mmol/L have hypoglycaemic and hypotensive episodes. Since this dialysate glucose concentration had no influence on lipid or hepatic metabolism, anthropometric parameters and especially HbA1C values in this short-term study, the long term examination of its effects is warranted.

The Effect of Hemodialysis and Acetate-Free Biofiltration on Anemia

The authors monitored, for a period of 12 months, anemia-, nutrition-, and free radical-related parameters and the rHuEPO dose required to maintain target hemoglobin (Hb) in 20 patients with chronic renal failure. Ten patients each were randomized for treatment by either acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) or low-flux hemodialysis (HD). At baseline, Hb levels were 102±2 (AFB) vs. 98±2 g/L (HD) (not significant difference, NS), the rHuEPO dose was 4050±976 vs. 5100±1538 IU/week (NS). Compared with baseline and with HD, lower rHuEPO doses were required during AFB at months 8, 9, 10 and 11, and 12 when they were 2100±510 (AFB) vs. 6000±1153 (HD), p=0.008. Prealbumin, transferrin and cholinesterase levels rose in the AFB group. Kt/V, albumin, transferrin saturation, aluminium, bicarbonate in serum, superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase in erythrocytes, and malondialdehyde and antioxidant capacity in plasma did not differ between the AFB and HD groups. In terms of anemia control, AFB using an AN69 membrane was found to be more advantageous than low-flux HD, AFB improves some nutritional parameters. The compared methods do not differ in their effect on lipid peroxidation and the antioxidant system. (Int J Artif Organs 2000; 23: 173–80)

Haemodiafiltration, haemofiltration and haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Convective dialysis modalities (haemofiltration (HF), haemodiafiltration (HDF), and acetate-free biofiltration (AFB)) removed excess body fluid across the dialysis membrane with positive pressure and accumulated middle- and larger-size accumulated solutes more efficiently than haemodialysis (HD). This increased larger solute removal combined with use of ultra-pure dialysis fluid in convective dialysis is hypothesised to reduce the frequency and severity of symptoms during dialysis as well as improve clinical outcomes. Convective dialysis therapies (HDF and HF) are associated with lower mortality compared to diffusive therapy (HD) in observational studies. This is an update of a review first published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

To compare convective (HF, HDF, or AFB) with diffusive (HD) dialysis modalities on clinical outcomes (mortality, major cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and treatment-related adverse events) in men and women with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (to 18 February 2015) through contact with a Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing convective therapy (HF, HDF, AFB) with another convective therapy or diffusive therapy (HD) for treatment of ESKD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent authors identified studies, extracted data and assessed study risk of bias. We summarised treatment effects using the random effects model. We reported results as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous data together with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed for heterogeneity using the Chi(2) test and explored the amount of variation in treatment estimates beyond that expected by chance using the I(2) statistic.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty studies comprising 667 participants were included in the 2006 review. In that review, there was insufficient evidence of treatment effects on major clinical outcomes to draw clinically meaningful conclusions. Searching to February 2015 identified 40 eligible studies comprising 3483 participants overall. In total, 35 studies (4039 participants) compared HF, HDF or AFB with HD, three studies (54 participants) compared AFB with HDF, and three studies (129 participants) compared HDF with HF.Risks of bias in all studies were generally high resulting in low confidence in estimated treatment effects. Convective dialysis had no significant effect on all-cause mortality (11 studies, 3396 participants: RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.05; I(2) = 34%), but significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality (6 studies, 2889 participants: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92; I(2) = 0%). One study reported no significant effect on rates of nonfatal cardiovascular events (714 participants: RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.50) and two studies showed no significant difference in hospitalisation (2 studies, 1688 participants: RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.63; I(2) = 0%). One study reported rates of hypotension during dialysis were significantly reduced with convective therapy (906 participants: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.80). Adverse events were not systematically evaluated in most studies and data for health-related quality of life were sparse. Convective therapies significantly reduced predialysis levels of B2 microglobulin (12 studies, 1813 participants: MD -5.55 mg/dL, 95% CI -9.11 to -1.98; I(2) = 94%) and increased dialysis dose (Kt/V urea) (14 studies, 2022 participants: MD 0.07, 95% CI -0.00 to 0.14; I(2) = 90%) compared to diffusive therapy, but results across studies were very heterogeneous. Sensitivity analyses limited to studies comparing HDF with HD showed very similar results. Directly comparative data for differing types of convective dialysis were insufficient to draw conclusions.Studies had important risks of bias leading to low confidence in the summary estimates and were generally limited to patients who had adequate dialysis vascular access.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Convective dialysis may reduce cardiovascular but not all-cause mortality and effects on nonfatal cardiovascular events and hospitalisation are inconclusive. However, any treatment benefits of convective dialysis on all patient outcomes including cardiovascular death are unreliable due to limitations in study methods and reporting. Future studies which assess treatment effects of convection dose on patient outcomes including mortality and cardiovascular events would be informative.

Carbon Dioxide and Acetate-Free Biofiltration: A Relationship to be Investigated

As the name reveals, acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) is featured by lack of acetate and this would seem to allow better hemodynamic stability. However, AFB also has a unique characteristic of carbon dioxide (CO2 )-free dialysate, whereas all other modern dialysis techniques imply an overload of CO2 from dialysate to the patient. This notwithstanding the role of CO2 in tolerance to dialysis treatment, both AFB and all other dialysis techniques seem not investigated in due depth. Specifically, the amount of CO2 coming back to the patient's bloodstream during AFB and bicarbonate dialysis (BD) is unknown. We measured partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2 ) in blood samples withdrawn from the venous line of the extracorporeal circuit during BD and subsequently during AFB in 22 stable chronic hemodialysis outpatients. The amount of CO2 coming back to the patient's bloodstream is higher in BD (59.1 ± 4.0 mmol/L) than in AFB (42.8 ± 4.5 mmol/L, P < 0.0001). Such difference exceeds 30%. Moreover, shifting from BD to AFB shows, notably for each patient, the reduction of pCO2 toward physiological values. BD implies CO2 overload from dialysate, whereas AFB does not. Further studies are required to evaluate if AFB would be the most appropriate dialysis technique in patients affected by chronic, but especially acute, lung diseases.

A randomized controlled study on the effects of acetate-free biofiltration on organic anions and acid-base balance in hemodialysis patients

Metabolic acidosis correction is achieved by the transfer of bicarbonate and other buffer anions in dialysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the main anions of intermediary metabolism on standard hemodiafiltration (HDF) and on acetate-free biofiltration (AFB). A prospective, in-center, crossover study was carried out with 22 patients on maintenance dialysis. Patients were randomly assigned to start with 12 successive sessions of standard HDF with bicarbonate (34 mmol/L) and acetate dialysate (3 mmol/L) or 12 successive sessions of AFB without base in the dialysate. Acetate increased significantly during the standard HDF session from 0.078 ± 0.062 mmol/L to 0.156 ± 0.128 mmol/L (P < 0.05) and remained unchanged at 0.044 ± 0.034 mmol and 0.055 ± 0.028 mmol/L in AFB modality. Differences in the acetate levels were observed at two hours (P < 0.005), at the end (P < 0.005) and thirty minutes after the session between HDF and AFB (P < 0.05). There were significantly more patients above the normal range in HDF group than AFB group (68.1% vs 4.5% P < 0.005) postdialysis and 30 minutes later. Serum lactate and pyruvate concentrations decreased during the sessions without differences between modalities. Citrate decreased only in the AFB group (P < 0.05). Acetoacetate and betahydroxybutyrate increased in both modalities, but the highest betahydroxybutyrate values were detected in HDF (P < 0.05). The sum of postdialysis unusual measured organic anions (OA) were higher in HDF compared to AFB (P < 0.05). AFB achieves an optimal control of acid-base equilibrium through a bicarbonate substitution fluid. It also prevents hyperacetatemia and restores internal homeostasis with less production of intermediary metabolites.

Convective therapies versus low-flux hemodialysis for chronic kidney failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Although convective therapies have gained popularity for the optimal removal of uremic solutes, their benefits and potential risks have not been fully elucidated. We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing convective therapies with low-flux hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney failure.

METHODS

We performed a literature search using MEDLINE (inception-December 2012), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, scientific abstracts from meetings and bibliographies of retrieved articles. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of convective therapies including high-flux hemodialysis, hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration versus low-flux hemodialysis were included. Random-effects model meta-analyses were used to examine continuous and binary outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-five (29 crossover and 36 parallel-arm) trials were identified (n = 12 182). Convective therapies resulted in a decrease in all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76, 1.02, P = 0.09], cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71, 0.98, P = 0.03), all-cause hospitalization (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.82, 1.01; P = 0.08) and therapy-related hypotension (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35, 0.87, P = 0.01). Convective therapies also resulted in an increase in the clearance of several low-molecular-weight (urea, creatinine and phosphate), middle-sized (β-2 microglobulin and leptin) and protein-bound (homocysteine, advanced glycation end-products and pentosidine) solutes and a decrease in inflammatory markers (interleukin-6). There was no impact of convective therapies on cardiac morphological and functional parameters, and blood pressure and anemia parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Although convective therapies are associated with improved clearance of uremic solutes, the potential long-term benefits of specific convective modalities require further study.

[Fluid overload and arterial hypertension in hemodialysis patients]

The water sodium overload is a factor of morbi-mortality and its treatment is one of the markers of adequacy of the hemodialysis treatment. Its first clinical assessment was improved by tools such as echocardiography and ultrasonography of the inferior vena cava, the per-dialytic curve of plasma volume, measuring BNP or proBNP and by impedancemetry. The combination of the evaluation of these parameters and of the clinical situation allows one to assess the extracellular overload, the state of the blood volume and the potential of plasma refilling. The latter is a key factor of the per-dialytic hemodynamic tolerance. It is itself a determining factor in weight can be achieved at the end of the session. Getting the "dry" weight can require modifications of the prescriptions of the hemodialysis sessions, a filling by albumin even a drugs support. Finally, the overload treatment is the central part of the treatment of arterial hypertension, which has to benefit however often from antihypertensive treatment the profit of which is demonstrated.

1H-NMR-based metabonomic analysis of metabolic profiling in diabetic nephropathy rats induced by streptozotocin

Elucidation of the metabolic profiling in diabetic nephropathy (DN) rats is of great assistance for understanding the pathogenesis of DN. In this study, 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabonomics combined with HPLC measurements was used to quantitatively analyze the metabolic changes in urine and kidney extracts from diabetic 2-wk and 8-wk rats induced by streptozotocin (STZ). Pattern recognition analysis of either urine or kidney extracts indicated that the two diabetic groups were separated obviously from the control group, suggesting that the metabolic profiles of the diabetic groups were markedly different from the control. The diabetic 8-wk rats showed lower levels of creatine, dimethylamine, and higher levels of ascorbate, succinate, lactate, citrate, allantoin, 2-ketoglutarate, and 3-hydrobutyrate (3-HB) in the urine samples. Moreover, the diabetic 8-wk rats displayed lower levels of succinate, creatine, myo-inositol, alanine, lactate, and ATP, and higher levels of 3-HB and glucose in the kidney extracts. The observed metabolic changes imply the enhanced pathways of either lipid or ketone body synthesis and decreased pathways of either tricarboxylic acid cycle or glycolysis in DN rats compared with the control. Our results suggest that the energy metabolic changes are associated with the pathogenic process of DN.

Correction of chronic metabolic acidosis for chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

Metabolic acidosis is a feature of chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to the reduced capacity of the kidney to synthesise ammonia and excrete hydrogen ions. It has adverse consequences on protein and muscle metabolism, bone turnover and the development of renal osteodystrophy. Metabolic acidosis may be corrected by oral bicarbonate supplementation or in dialysis patients by increasing the bicarbonate concentration in dialysate fluid.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the benefits and harms of treating metabolic acidosis in patients with CKD, both prior to reaching end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or whilst on renal replacement therapy (RRT), with sodium bicarbonate or increasing the bicarbonate concentration of dialysate.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, issue 4 2005), Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register (October 2005), MEDLINE (1966 - October 2005) and EMBASE (1980 - October 2005).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), crossover RCTs and quasi-RCTs investigating the correction of chronic metabolic acidosis in adults or children with CKD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Outcomes were analysed using relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (MD) for continuous measures.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three trials in adult dialysis patients (n = 117). There were insufficient data for most outcomes for meta-analysis. In all three trials acidosis improved in the intervention group though there was variation in achieved bicarbonate level. There was no evidence of effect on blood pressure or sodium levels. Some measures of nutritional status/protein metabolism (e.g. SGA, NP NA) were significantly improved by correction in the one trial that looked in these in detail. There was heterogeneity of the effect on serum albumin in two trials. Serum PTH fell significantly in the two trials that estimated this, there was no significant effect on calcium or phosphate though both fell after correction. Complex bone markers were assessed in one study, with some evidence for a reduction in bone turnover in those with initial high bone turnover and an increase in low turnover patients. The studies were underpowered to assess clinical outcomes, in the one study that did there was some evidence for a reduction in hospitalisation after correction.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for the benefits and risks of correcting metabolic acidosis is very limited with no RCTs in pre-ESRD patients, none in children, and only three small trials in dialysis patients. These trials suggest there may be some beneficial effects on both protein and bone metabolism but the trials were underpowered to provide robust evidence.

Role of B-type natriuretic peptide in cardiovascular state monitoring in a hemodialysis patient with primary amyloidosis

BACKGROUND

Cardiac involvement occurs in up to 50% of patients with primary or A amyloidosis (ALA) and is associated with very poor prognosis. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been proposed as a guide for treatment of heart failure patients and as an index of myocardial dysfunction in patients with ALA. Data about BNP dosage for cardiovascular monitoring of patients with ALA on renal replacement therapy are lacking.

CASE

A 64 year old Caucasian man was admitted because of nephrotic syndrome in July 2003. Renal diagnosis was ALA. Melphalan and prednisolone were given but renal function worsened and in April 2004 standard bicarbonate hemodialysis was started. In March 2004 thalidomide was added to his therapy. During the follow-up ejection fraction was stable and was 65% on the contrary E/A ratio gradually increased and overtook 1. BNP plasma levels were increased and the values recorded during the follow-up were: 2505 pg/mL in October 2003 (normal reference values<100), 1827 in April 2004, 4006 in June 2004, 5000 in September 2004, 3750 in January 2005 and 1920 in April 2005. In September 2005 BNP was 3380 pg/mL. The patient was still alive after a follow-up longer than two years.

CONCLUSION

In ALA patients a powerful prognostic role of BNP has been reported whose expression is increased in ventricular myocytes of patients with cardiac involvement. BNP level monitoring does not appear to be superior to standard echocardiography in evaluating cardiovascular status of uremic patients with ALA.

Haemodiafiltration, haemofiltration and haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) can be achieved by several interventions including haemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and kidney transplantation. HD, haemofiltration (HF), haemodiafiltration (HDF) and acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) are extracorporeal RRT methods. It has been suggested that HF and HDF may reduce the frequency and severity of intradialytic and post-dialytic adverse symptoms and may be more effective than HD in the removal of high molecular weight molecules.

OBJECTIVES

To compare convective modes of extracorporeal RRT (HF, HDF or AFB) with HD and to establish if any of these techniques is superior to each other in patients with ESKD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (1966-2006), EMBASE (1980-2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library issue 2, 2006) and CINAHL (1872-2006). Authors of included studies were contacted, reference lists of identified RCTs and relevant narrative reviews were screened.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs comparing HF, HDF, AFB and HD for ESKD were included. Trials enrolling any patient undergoing RRT for ESKD were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes or weighted mean difference (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was measured using the Chi-square (chi(2)) and I(2) statistic.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty studies (657 patients) were included. Seventeen studies compared HF, HDF or AFB with HD, two compared HDF with AFB and one compared HF with HDF. The studies were generally small with suboptimal quality. Convective modalities (HF, HDF, AFB) did not differ significantly from HD for mortality (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.23 to 12.13; chi(2)= 2.58, P = 0.11, I(2) = 61.2%), number of hospital admissions/year (MD 0.20, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.47) and dialysis adequacy (Kt/V: MD 0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.17; chi(2) = 3.73, P = 0.29, I(2) = 19.6%). No study assessed number of dialysis treatments associated with "any adverse symptoms", sessions that were stopped early, change of dialysis modality or dialysis-related amyloidosis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to demonstrate whether convective modalities (either HF, HDF or AFB) have significant advantages over HD with regard to clinically important outcomes of mortality, dialysis-related hypotension and hospitalisation. More adequately-powered good quality RCTs assessing clinically important outcomes (mortality, hospitalisation, quality of life) are needed.

Comparison of hemodialysis, hemofiltration, and acetate-free biofiltration for ESRD: systematic review

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing hemodialysis (HD), hemofiltration (HF), hemodiafiltration (HDF), and acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) in the treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease to assess their clinical effectiveness.

METHODS

The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the American College of Physicians Database, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of HF, HDF, and AFB compared with HD; HDF compared with AFB; and HF compared with HDF. Two reviewers extracted data for all-cause mortality; hypotension, headache, nausea, vomiting, and any other adverse symptoms; quality of life (QoL); hospitalization; dialysis adequacy; and end-of-treatment beta 2 -microglobulin levels. Analysis was by means of a random-effects model, and results are expressed as relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Eighteen eligible trials (588 patients) were identified. HDF was associated with significantly greater mortality risk than HD (4 trials, 326 patients; RR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.37 to 9.47). Risk for mortality was not different among the other comparisons. Risks for hypotension episodes and dialysis-related symptoms were not significantly different with HD, HF, HDF, and AFB (18 trials, 583 patients). QoL, assessed by using an unvalidated scoring tool, appeared to be significantly improved in patients on HDF therapy than those on HD therapy (1 trial, 67 patients; WMD, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.9), but this was not evident when validated QoL assessment tools were used. Use of AFB compared with HDF was not associated with a significant difference in risk for hospitalization (1 trial, 11 patients; WMD, -0.45; 95% CI, -1.42 to 0.52). HDF in comparison to HD did not reduce the risk for carpal tunnel syndrome (1 trial, 67 patients; RR, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.59 to 7.00). Kt/V was significantly different with HDF compared with HD (3 trials, 124 patients; WMD, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.22). No other substantial data for these interventions and their impact on major patient-centered outcomes were available.

CONCLUSION

The trials assessed were not powered adequately and had suboptimal method quality. It is not possible on the basis of effectiveness to prefer one extracorporeal renal replacement therapy modality to the other for end-stage kidney disease because significant differences in clinically important outcomes have not been shown by available published RCTs.

Optimal composition of the dialysate, with emphasis on its influence on blood pressure

Introduction. From the beginning of the dialysis era, the most appropriate composition of the dialysate has been one of the central topics in the delivery of dialysis treatment.

METHODS

A discussion is employed to achieve a consensus on key points relating to the composition of the dialysate, focusing on the relationships with blood pressure behaviour.

RESULTS

Sodium balance is the cornerstone of intra-dialysis cardiovascular stability and good inter-dialysis blood pressure control. Hypernatric dialysis carries the risk of positive sodium balance, with the consequent possibility of the worsening sense of thirst and hypertension. Conversely, hyponatric dialysis may lead to negative sodium balance, with the possibility of intra-dialysis cardiovascular instability and 'disequilibrium' symptoms including fatigue, muscle cramps and headache. The goal is to remove with dialysis the exact amount of sodium that has accumulated in the inter-dialysis interval. The conductivity kinetic model is applicable on-line at each dialysis session and has been proved to be able to improve intra-dialytic cardiovascular stability in hypotension-prone patients. Therefore, it should be regarded as a promising tool to be implemented in everyday clinical practice. Serum potassium concentration and variations during dialysis treatment certainly play a role in the genesis of cardiac arrhythmia. Potassium profiling, with a constant gradient between plasma and dialysate, should be implemented in clinical practice to minimize the arrhythmogenic potential of dialysis. Calcium plays a role both in myocardial contractility and in peripheral vascular resistance. Therefore, an increase in dialysate calcium concentration may be useful in cardiac compromised hypotension-prone patients. Acid-buffering by means of base supplementation is one of the major roles of dialysis. Bicarbonate concentration in the dialysate should be personalized in order to reach a midweek pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration of 22 mmol/l. The role of convective dialysis techniques in cardiovascular stability is still under debate. It has been demonstrated that dialysate temperature and sodium balance play a role and this should be taken into account. Whether removal of vasoactive, middle-sized compounds by convection plays an independent role in improving cardiovascular stability is still uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

The prescription of dialysis fluid is moving from a pre-fixed, standard dialysate solution to individualization of electrolyte and buffer composition, not only during the dialysis session, but also within the same session (profiling) in order to provide patients with an optimal blood purification coupled with a high degree of tolerability.

Acetate-free hemodialysis: a feasibility study on a technical alternative to bicarbonate dialysis

This study aimed at evaluating the feasibility of an acetate-free hemodialysis (AFHD) technique, comparing it with acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) and bicarbonate dialysis (BD). The assessment of the parameters concerned: electrolyte kinetics (Na+, K+), acid-base balance (HCO3-, pH), dialysis efficiency (Kt/V), serum beta2-microglobulin reduction ratio, nutritional status (normalized protein catabolic rate, serum albumin and total proteins, body mass index), hemopoietic status (hemoglobin, hematocrit), and some clinical parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, percent blood volume reduction measured by Hemoscan). Nine patients participated in this study which was conducted using a Latin square randomized experimental design. The results of the last week of each month of the study (1 month for each technique) were analyzed by means of Anova for repeated measures. The different treatments were comparable with regard to the main dialysis parameters such as blood flow (320 ml/min) and weight loss rate (0.6 +/- 0.1 kg/h), while dialysis length and dialysate conductivities were different, depending on the dialysis technique. Electrolyte kinetics and acid-base balance were similar during the three periods. The dialysis efficiency for small molecules (Kt/V of urea) was similar (between 1.4 and 1.6); however, AFB seemed to show a higher beta2-microglobulin reduction rate (47.6 +/- 4 vs. 4.3 +/- 10% for AFHD and vs. 9.9 +/- 5% for BD; p < 0.001). The nutritional and hemopoietic status maintained stable, and the hemodynamic parameters were comparable during all periods. The percent blood volume reduction at the end of the treatments was not statistically different (-14.9 +/- 9.4% in AFB, -12.1 +/- 5.1% in AFHD, and -12.2 +/- 4.4% in BD), and these results could explain the similar hemodynamic behavior during the three periods. In conclusion, AFHD appears to be a safe technique which has all positive effects of AFB and the low costs of BD. In our opinion, it could be used in patients with few clinical impairments, usually treated with hemodialysis, in whom a biocompatible treatment is indicated.

Optimal dialysis for the end-stage renal disease patient with cardiovascular disease

The increasing incidence and prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) that requires renal replacement therapy has placed a focus on the dialysis procedure itself with respect to its hemodynamic and cardiovascular complications. More than 50% of patients with ESRD will die of cardiovascular disease (CVD). A considerable contribution to cardiovascular events occurs with the dialysis procedure itself. This paper explores the intradialytic complications of hemodialysis as they relate to the cardiovascular system and highlights opportunities for research and improved quality of care.

Online hemodiafiltration versus acetate-free biofiltration: a prospective crossover study

Online hemodiafiltration (online HDF) and acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) are 2 innovative renal replacement therapies. Convincing evidence has shown that both techniques are superior to conventional hemodialysis in many aspects. The aim of the present investigation was to compare online HDF and AFB in 12 stable maintenance hemodialysis patients in a prospective, randomized crossover trial. Twelve stable dialysis patients, age 49.7 +/- 11.3 years and on dialysis for 83.5 +/- 76.7 months, were treated prospectively and randomly by either AFB, predilution HDF (pre-HDF), or postdilution HDF (post-HDF) for a total of 36 weeks using exclusively F60S high-flux dialyzers. Routine blood biochemical tests, bone metabolism parameters, and clearance for both small and larger molecular weight substances were measured at defined intervals. During the trial period inter- and intradialysis symptoms, e.g., hypotensive episodes and intradialysis arterial blood gas analyses, were recorded. Both online HDF and AFB were well accepted by the overwhelming majority of patients and also by the dialysis staff. Pretreatment sodium, total and ionized calcium, chloride, bicarbonate, and urea did not differ within or between the 3 treatment groups. Potassium increased slightly in HDF patients while phosphate and beta2-microglobulin (beta2-M) decreased in all groups. After dialysis, AFB patients exhibited a significantly higher bicarbonate concentration and lower potassium level when identical potassium concentrations in dialysate were used. Patients receiving AFB manifested less intradialysis partial pressure of oxygen drop and partial pressure of carbon dioxide rise than those on HDF treatments. HDF treatments could afford higher single-pool and double-pool Kt/V, higher effective urea and beta2M clearance, and lower total interdialysis symptom scores than the AFB treatment method. While bone metabolism parameters did not differ between the 3 dialysis modalities, some parameters such as deoxypyridinoline in HDF and osteocalcin, pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline in AFB deteriorated at the end of the crossover study. Aluminum concentration decreased progressively to about one-third of prestudy values at the end of the study with all 3 treatments. AFB was associated with a lower predialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP), a smaller drop in MAP during treatment, and similar hypotension episodes compared with the 2 HDF treatments. Albumin concentration showed a trend to decrease during the first 2 months of the trial period followed by a slight increase thereafter but still significantly lower than initial value at the end of crossover. Both online HDF and AFB share most of the features of optimal renal replacement therapy. Online HDF is superior to AFB in such aspects as increased delivered dialysis dose both for small and larger molecular weight toxins and less interdialysis symptoms. On the other hand, AFB is associated with a smaller effect on arterial blood gas values and improved intradialysis hemodynamic tolerance. Some dialysis-related symptoms and complications in the case of our AFB practice could be attributable, at least in part, to low dialysate calcium level.