Chloramine-induced haemolysis presenting as erythropoietin resistance

Methemoglobinemia in Hemodialysis Patients due to Acute Chlorine Intoxication: A Case Series Calling Attention on an Old Problem

INTRODUCTION

Hemodialysis uses municipal water that must be strictly purified and sterilized to be used for that procedure. Large amounts of decontaminants are often used, such as chlorine, and if these compounds are not subsequently removed they can be transferred to the blood of patients causing complications including methemoglobinemia.

METHODS

In this case series study, dialysis patients in one unit were evaluated. We reviewed clinical characteristics and laboratory findings obtained on the day when the water supply was disinfected with chlorine, with the aim to quantify methemoglobin concentrations. Our objective was to characterize the clinical presentation and management of patients who presented with methemoglobinemia on a specific index day. We also reviewed reported cases in the literature regarding this underreported complication.

RESULTS

Eight patients who presented with chlorine intoxication were evaluated. The methemoglobin concentrations were between 1.3% and 7.9% (reference value 0-1%). We believe this to be caused by water containing 0.78 mg/L of total chlorine. Seven patients presented with cyanosis, 4 with dizziness, 6 with dark brown blood, 4 with dyspnea, and 4 with headache and hemolytic anemia. Subjects were treated with supplemental oxygen, methylene blue, intravenous vitamin C, blood transfusions, and increased doses of erythropoietin. No patient died, and all continued with their usual hemodialysis sessions.

CONCLUSION

Acute chlorine intoxication transferred by the water used during hemodialysis sessions can present with methemoglobinemia accompanied by cyanosis, oxygen desaturation, and hemolytic anemia. Chlorine levels should be carefully monitored in the water used for hemodialysis treatment.

Exposure to Chloramine and Chloroform in Tap Water and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Shanghai

Chloramine and chloroform are widespread in tap water due to water disinfection processes. This study was designed to explore the associations between trimester-specific exposure to chloramine and chloroform in tap water and adverse outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included 109,182 mother–infant singleton pairs in Shanghai. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the associations of chloramine and chloroform concentrations averaged over the whole pregnancy and in each trimester with adverse outcomes, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), gestational hypertensive disorders (GHD), low birthweight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), preterm birth (PTB) and prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM). The use of tap water with elevated chloramine levels in the first trimester was associated with GDM (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.09), while that in the second trimester was related to GHD (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.17). Chloroform levels in the third trimester were associated with LBW (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.16), PTB (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.08) and PROM (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.01). However, tap water chloroform exposure in the second trimester was negatively associated with LBW (OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93, 0.98) and PTB (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99). In conclusion, there are probably no casual associations between current tap water chloroform and chloramine levels and perinatal outcomes. However, more research focusing on the effect of chloramine and chloroform on perinatal outcomes are still warranted.

Application of two on-site quantitative methods for the detection of total chlorine in the water in the hemodialysis industry

To observe the application of two instruments for the quantitative detection of total chlorine in the water in the hemodialysis industry, thereby evaluating the accuracy of the two tools and the consistency of their results, and evaluating their practical significance for the safety of hemodialysis treatment. Two methods, based on diethyl-p-phenylenediamine spectrophotometry and amperometric methods, were employed to detect the total chlorine concentration in running water and in activated carbon tank effluent. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the two instruments. The Bland-Altman test was used to evaluate the consistency of the two methods. The total chlorine tester showed high accuracy and good repeatability in terms of detecting the total chlorine concentration in running water and activated carbon tank effluent. The residual chlorine sensor had high accuracy and good repeatability for detecting the concentrations of total and free chlorine, respectively, in running water. When detecting the concentrations of total and free chlorine in the effluent of the activated carbon tank, the two test results showed a moderate correlation. The two detection methods had good consistency for the detection of total chlorine concentrations in running water and activated carbon tank effluent. The two reviewed methods can monitor changes in the total chlorine in running water and activated carbon tank effluent. It is important to take timely measures when the total chlorine concentration of the activated carbon tank effluent reaches a certain warning value, and therefore to better ensure the safety of hemodialysis treatment.

Membrane Distillation of Human Plasma Ultrafiltrate and its Theoretical Applications to Haemodialysis Techniques

Membrane Distillation (MD) is a technique that allows the extraction of water from aqueous solutions. The basic principle is that vapour, but not liquid water, can pass through hydrophobic micro-porous membranes, along a temperature gradient, with consequent separation of water from solutes. In this study we evaluated the possibility to utilise MD to extract water from Plasma Ultrafiltrate (PU) of patients with Chronic Renal Failure (CRF). The experiments were carried out in vitro by a hydro-phobic polypropylene hollow-fibre distillation module; PU was obtained by a CRF patient utilising a high permeability polisulphone membrane. The results show that water can be extracted by MD from PU of CRF subjects at a constant rate and that none of the substances analysed in PU was able to pass through the polypropilene membrane. In the future MD could integrate extra-corporeal blood purification techniques allowing the re-utilisation of plasmatic water thus ameliorating the treatment of uraemia.

The Role of Improved Water Quality on Inflammatory Markers in Patients Undergoing Regular Dialysis

Hemodialysis utilizes large quantities of water for the preparation of dialysis fluid. Such water meets national standards and international standards but a considerable disparity exists between such standards with respect to microbiological purity. This study collated and retrospectively analyzed the impact of upgrading water systems from that specified in the US standards to those specified in European standards on clinical measures associated with inflammation in four metropolitan dialysis units for two periods. Two periods were compared, three months prior to and six months post upgrading the water treatment systems. The monthly total erythropoietin dosage and intravenous iron supplementation for each patient were also compared over these periods. Variables with significant pre-post differences were assessed using multivariate models to control for confounding factors.

The results indicated significant increases in hemoglobin, ferritin and TSat (all p < 0.0001) and albumin (p = 0.0001) were associated with improvement in water quality. Decreases in CRP and creatinine (both p < 0.0001) were also noted.

These findings suggest that the current regulations in the United States set the microbiological limits of water and dialysis fluid inappropriately high, and the limits should be revised downwards, since such an approach is reflected in improvement in markers of inflammation.

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Hemodialysis Emergencies

Given the high comorbidity in patients on hemodialysis and the complexity of the dialysis treatment, it is remarkable how rarely a life-threatening complication occurs during dialysis. The low rate of dialysis emergencies can be attributed to numerous safety features in modern dialysis machines; meticulous treatment and testing of the dialysate solution to prevent exposure to trace elements, toxins, and pathogens; adherence to detailed treatment protocols; and extensive training of dialysis staff to handle medical emergencies. Most hemodialysis emergencies can be attributed to human error. A smaller number are due to rare idiosyncratic reactions. In this review, we highlight major emergencies that may occur during hemodialysis treatments, describe their pathogenesis, offer measures to minimize them, and provide specific interventions to prevent catastrophic consequences on the rare occasions when such emergencies arise. These emergencies include dialysis disequilibrium syndrome, venous air embolism, hemolysis, venous needle dislodgement, vascular access hemorrhage, major allergic reactions to the dialyzer or treatment medications, and disruption or contamination of the dialysis water system. Finally, we describe root cause analysis after a dialysis emergency has occurred to prevent a future recurrence.

Complications of hemodialysis treatments due to dialysate contamination and composition errors

Although hemodialysis is a routine outpatient treatment for millions of patients with a proven safety record, accidents and errors do occur from time to time. Many nephrologists are unaware of the technical aspects of providing a safe and reliable dialysate and rely on the support and advice of renal technologists. Complications may arise due to bacterial and chemical contamination of potable water, errors in dialysate acid or bicarbonate solution composition and proportioning, and resetting machine conductivity and temperature controls. As such, clinicians need to be aware of the possible complications of hemodialysis so that these are recognized promptly to provide appropriate management and minimize patient harm.

What Medical Directors Need to Know about Dialysis Facility Water Management

The medical directors of dialysis facilities have many operational clinic responsibilities, which on first glance, may seem outside the realm of excellence in patient care. However, a smoothly running clinic is integral to positive patient outcomes. Of the conditions for coverage outlined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, one most critical to quality dialysis treatment is the provision of safe purified dialysis water, because there are many published instances where clinic failure in this regard has resulted in patient harm. As the clinical leader of the facility, the medical director is obliged to have knowledge of his/her facility's water treatment system to reliably ensure that the purified water used in dialysis will meet the standards for quality set by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for conditions for coverage. The methods used to both achieve and maintain these quality standards should be a part of quality assessment and performance improvement program meetings. The steps for water treatment, which include pretreatment, purification, and distribution, are largely the same, regardless of the system used. Each water treatment system component has a specific role in the process and requires individualized maintenance and monitoring. The medical director should provide leadership by being engaged with the process, knowing the facility's source water, and understanding water treatment system operation as well as the clinical significance of system failure. Successful provision of quality water will be achieved by those medical directors who learn, know, and embrace the requirements of dialysis water purification and system maintenance.

Pre-emptive replacement of water treatment components improves responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in maintenance haemodialysis patients: a quality improvement report

Hypo-responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has been associated with increased mortality. We examined the effect of water treatment component replacement on declining ESA responsiveness in the absence of chemical or microbiological standards failure. Pre-emptive renewal of the water treatment system supplying 802 standard-flux haemodialysis patients resulted in a significant rise in haemoglobin from (mean ± SD) 12.1 ± 1.2 to 12.3 ± 1.0 g/dl (p < 0.0001), accompanied by a significant decrease in prescribed dose of darbepoetin alfa from 47.9 ± 27.3 to 44.7 ± 27.6 μg/week (p < 0.0001). ESA responsiveness improved significantly from 0.060 ± 0.041 to 0.055 ± 0.040 μg/kg/g · dl(-1) (p < 0.0001) and the number of patients no longer requiring ESA therapy increased threefold. These benefits were derived in the absence of haemolysis or significant changes in water quality. Renewal of water system components should be conducted even in the absence of proven microbiological and chemical failure.

Warning: an anemia outbreak due to chloramine exposure in a clean hemodialysis unit--an issue to be revisited

In July 2004, an anemia outbreak was identified in our hemodialysis (HD) unit. The dialysate chloramine levels had risen from <0.1 mg/mL in May to 0.27 mg/mL in August 2004. Other parameters of water quality were within accepted standards. Hematocrit (Ht) and hemoglobin (Hb) returned to basal values after one month without changing recombinant human erythropoetin (rHuEpo) doses and with exchange of activated charcoal column. Chloramines (chlorine and ammonia) are used routinely to disinfect and sterilize potable water. High blood levels of chloramines are associated with hemolysis and rarely methemoglobinemia. Uremic patients have a decreased ability to withstand oxidative stress. It is postulated that their antioxidant capacity is reduced, yet the mechanism remains unclear. Patients on maintenance hemodialysis are vulnerable to chloramine toxicity if chloramines are inadequately removed from water.

Influence of clinical factors on the haemolysis marker haptoglobin

BACKGROUND

Plasma haptoglobin determination is clinically used as parameter for haemolysis. To date, however, the influence of the mode of haemolysis (extravascular vs. intravascular) and of nonhaemolytic conditions on haptoglobin concentration and its reliability as a haemolysis marker remain poorly defined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a total of 479 individuals, the influence of haemolytic and nonhaemolytic conditions on plasma haptoglobin levels was investigated.

RESULTS

All studied types of haemolytic disease (n = 16) were associated with markedly decreased plasma haptoglobin levels, without significant differences between intravascular vs. predominantly extravascular haemolysis. Diminished haptoglobin values were also observed in patients with liver cirrhosis, which normalized after liver transplantation. In contrast, markedly increased haptoglobin levels were found in patients with inflammation. In patients with haemolysis and a concomitant acute-phase response, however, haemolysis-dependent haptoglobin depletion was not attenuated. Interestingly, patients with a strongly positive direct antiglobulin test or high cold agglutinin titre but no further evidence for haemolysis had normal haptoglobin values. Likewise, anaemia owing to bone marrow failure, acute gastrointestinal or chronic diffuse blood loss, and end-stage kidney disease were associated with normal haptoglobin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma haptoglobin depletion is a reliable marker for the instant diagnosis of accelerated red cell destruction irrespective of the site of haemolysis or the presence of inflammation. The capacity of this parameter to predict haemolysis appears to be limited in patients with liver cirrhosis and decreased haptoglobin production only.

The Importance of Water Quality and Haemodialysis Fluid Composition

Treatment of renal failure by haemodialysis uses dialysis fluid to facilitate the normalization of electrolyte and acid base abnormalities and the removal of low molecular weight uraemic compounds present in the plasma such as urea. The dialysis fluid is a continuously produced blend of treated tap water and a concentrated solution containing electrolytes, buffer, and glucose. The water used originates as drinking water but undergoes additional treatment. Recent surveys have indicated that the chemical and microbiological content of such water frequently fails to meet the requirements of established standards, and its bacterial content arising from the presence of a biofilm in the water distribution network or the hydraulic circuit of the dialysis machine is a contributory factor to the chronic inflammatory state in patients undergoing regular dialysis. The composition of the dialysis fluid plays an important role in the modulation of complications associated with end-stage renal disease, as well as those associated with the treatment itself. The avoidance of complications arising from water contaminants requires a constant and vigorous attention to water quality, whilst with the composition of electrolytes and buffer there is a trend towards greater individualization to provide a high degree of treatment tolerance.

Dialysis water as a determinant of the adequacy of dialysis

Hemodialysis patients are exposed to large volumes of water in the form of dialysate. Contaminants from the dialysate may cross the dialyzer membrane into the blood and have the potential to compromise the adequacy of dialysis. Several chemicals found commonly in drinking water have long been known to be toxic to hemodialysis patients. More recently, it has become apparent that even low levels of bacterial products in dialysate may adversely impact dialysis adequacy through their ability to stimulate an inflammatory response. Minimum levels of water and dialysate quality have been recommended to protect patients from chemical and microbiologic contaminants. Complying with these recommendations requires an appropriately designed water purification and distribution system, combined with a surveillance program designed to maintain dialysate quality.

RENAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE SYMPOSIUM: The Implications of Water Quality in Hemodialysis

Water used in dialysis requires additional treatment to minimize patient exposure to potential contaminants that may be present in drinking water. Although standards for the chemical purity of water are in existence and have eliminated many of the problems seen in renal units in the 1970s, some problems remain, and the importance of newer contaminants arising from changes in water treatment at the municipal level are being recognized. Despite this, recent surveys have indicated considerable shortcomings in compliance with chemical standards. The water quality used in the preparation of dialysis fluid also requires minimal bacterial content. Staff working in renal units are frequently unaware of the level of microbiologic contamination in their dialysis fluid arising from the presence of biofilm in the dialysis machines and the water distribution network. Bacterial fragments generated by such biofilms are able to cross the dialysis membrane and stimulate an inflammatory response in the patient. Such inflammation has been implicated in the mortality and morbidity associated with dialysis. The desire to improve treatment outcomes has led to the application of more stringent standards for the microbiologic purity of dialysis fluid and to the introduction of ultraclean dialysis fluid into clinical practice.

The physiology and pharmacology of singlet oxygen

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated by many different cells. Singlet oxygen (1O(2)) and a reaction product of it, excited carbonyls (C=O*), are important ROS. 1O(2) and C=O* are nonradicalic and emit light (one photon/molecule) when returning to ground state oxygen. Especially activated polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocytes (PMN) produce large amounts of 1O(2). Via activation of the respiratory burst (NADPH oxidase and myeloperoxidase) they synthesize hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chloramines (in particular N-chlorotaurine). Chloramines are selective and stable chemical generators of 1O(2). In the human organism, 1O(2) is both a signal and a weapon with therapeutic potency against very different pathogens, such as microbes, virus, cancer cells and thrombi. Chloramines at blood concentrations between 1 and 2 mmol/L inactivate lipid enveloped virus and chloramines at blood concentrations below 0.5 mmol/L, i.e. at oxidant concentrations that do not affect thrombocytes or hemostasis factors, act antithrombotically by activation of the physiologic PMN mediated fibrinolysis; this thrombolysis is of selective nature, i.e. it does not impair the hemostasis system of the patient allowing the antithrombotic treatment in patients where the current risky thrombolytic treatment is contraindicated. The action of 1O(2) might be compared to the signaling and destroying gunfire of soldiers directed against bandits at night, resulting in an autorecruitment of the physiological inflammatory response. Chloramines (such as the mild and untoxic oxidant chloramine T (N-chloro-p-toluene-sulfonamide)) and their signaling and destroying reaction product 1O(2) might be promising new therapeutic agents against a multitude of up to now refractory diseases.

Water treatment for hemodialysis: ensuring patient safety

Patient safety has become an important focus of the Institute of Medicine and the medical community. Although hemodialysis is a routine therapy, it is nonetheless a complex procedure where errors can occur. In particular, errors related to water quality can lead to patient injury and to increased medical costs. Using the Institute of Medicine report on errors in medicine as a basis, this article discusses previously published incidents of patient injury related to water quality in terms of the types of errors that occurred. Epidemiologic techniques provide a framework to identify, correct, and possibly avert these types of errors in the future. While the ultimate responsibility for ensuring water quality rests with the medical director of the hemodialysis unit, patient safety should be a concern of all members of the nephrology community.

[Outbreak of hemolytic reactions associated with chlorine and chloramine residuals in hemodialysis water]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the process of water contamination and to assess the subsequent outbreak in the hemodialysis center.

METHODS

In September 2000, sixteen patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis at a dialysis center in Minas Gerais, Brazil, experienced hemolytic reactions compatible with toxic symptoms due to chlorine and chloramine water contamination. Chlorine and chloramine concentrations in samples obtained from various sites of the dialysis center's water treatment and distribution system were measured. Case-patients were identified by reviewing medical records and nursing notes for all dialysis sessions carried out during the study period. Interviews with technicians, nursing and medical staff members were conducted.

RESULTS

Reaction rate was significantly higher (p<0.028) during the outbreak period (September 25 to 27, 2000) than the pre-outbreak period (September 18 to 20, 2000). All patients with toxic symptoms had been under dialysis with water treated by reverse osmosis equipment and had used dialysers manually reprocessed. Chlorine and chloramine residuals concentrations found in the dialysis water as well as in the dialysers were at levels higher than regulations, </=0.5 mg/L for chlorine and </= 0.1 mg/L for chloramine. Individuals exposed to high chlorine and chloramine concentrations presented a relative risk of 2.58 (1.0-6.28) of having hemolytic reactions.

CONCLUSION

There is a need to observe surveillance procedures to secure that the maximum allowable concentrations of regulated substances in the water used in the hemodialysis process are not exceeded.

Acute aluminum encephalopathy in a dialysis center caused by a cement mortar water distribution pipe

BACKGROUND

In Curaçao, distilled seawater from the water plant was used without further purification for hemodialysis for several decades. A new distribution pipe supplying water to a dialysis center on the island was installed in May 1996. To protect it from corrosion, this pipe was lined on the inside with a cement mortar. Because of the aggressiveness of the distilled water, calcium and aluminum (Al) leached from the cement mortar into the water used to prepare dialysate. This caused a possible hard water syndrome and definite acute Al intoxication.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical details and outcome at follow-up, and arranged laboratory and toxicological studies of serum and hemodialysis water.

RESULTS

Of the 27 patients who had a similar exposure ( approximately 60 hours) to the contaminated dialysate, 10 died from acute Al encephalopathy, whereas 17 patients had no or only minor symptoms and survived. The nonsurvivors were older (64 +/- 3 years vs. 52 +/- 2 years, P < 0.01) and had a lower body weight (57.5 +/- 5.9 kg vs. 86.5 +/- 4.1 kg, P < 0.01) and lower serum albumin concentrations (33 +/- 1 vs. 36 +/- 1 g/L, P < 0.01). Anuria tended to be more common in the nonsurvivors (8 out of 10 vs. 8 out of 17, P> 0.05). Serum Al concentrations, available in seven nonsurvivors, were significantly higher than in the survivors (808 +/- 127 vs. 255 +/- 25 microg/L, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The water distribution pipe was lined with a cement mortar that was probably inappropriate for transporting drinking water. Water distribution facilities as well as the dialysis community should be aware of the possibility of Al leaching from cemented water distribution pipes. Similar Al loads appear to induce a more severe intoxication in malnourished, older patients with smaller Al distribution volumes and anuria.

Haemolysis in haemodialysis patients: evidence for impaired defence mechanisms against oxidative stress

BACKGROUND

Uraemic patients have a decreased ability to withstand oxidative stress. It is postulated that their antioxidant capacity is reduced, yet the mechanism remains unclear. Recently 33 haemodialysis (HD) patients were exposed to chloramine contamination in the water supply. This led to haemolysis in 24 patients, while nine were unaffected. In the former group haemoglobin decreased from 11.7+/-1.1 to 8.5+/- 1.4 g/dl (P<0.0001) and returned to 11.4+/-0.9 g/dl (P<0.0001) following recovery. During haemolysis, haptoglobin was 38.4+/-10.6 vs 138.1+/-8.3 ng/dl (P<0.0001) following recovery.

METHODS

To explore the factors affecting the severity of haemolysis we studied extracellular and intracellular anti-oxidant defence mechanisms 3 months after recovery. In 29 patients and 20 controls we determined plasma glutathione (GSH), and the erythrocyte enzymes glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), glutathione reductase (GSH-Rx), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Serum malondialdehyde (MDA) was measured as a marker of oxidative stress.

RESULTS

Plasma GSH was lower in patients as compared to controls (5.49+/-0.26 vs 7.4+/-0.5 micromol/l, P<0.005). There was an inverse correlation between GSH and the degree of haemolysis (r=-0.42, P<0.02). Patients had higher GSH-Rx (4.64+/-0.15 vs 3.97+/-0.12 U/gHb, P<0.02), lower GSH-Px (29. 7+/-1.85 vs 35.5+/-1.62 U/gHb, P<0.001), and similar SOD (0.63+/-0. 02 vs 0.51+/-0.02 U/mgHb) as compared to controls. There was no correlation between the enzyme levels and the degree of haemolysis. MDA was higher in patients (2.37+/-0.07 vs 0.97+/-0.1 nmol/ml, P<0. 0001). There was a correlation between MDA and the years patients were on HD (r=0.43, P<0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that HD patients have an impaired anti-oxidant response, which may be attributed in part, to plasma GSH deficiency. Patients with the lowest plasma GSH levels are more susceptible to oxidative stress and consequent haemolysis.