Low-potassium and glucose-free dialysis maintains urea but enhances potassium removal

Potassium responses to sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in hyperkalemic hemodialysis patients: post-hoc analysis of DIALIZE

BACKGROUND

Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for hyperkalemia in maintenance hemodialysis patients. In post-hoc analyses of the phase 3b DIALIZE study, we examined the spectrum of potassium responses to SZC.

METHODS

Post-hoc analyses with SZC and placebo included: the number of long interdialytic interval (LIDI) visits during the 4-week evaluation period where patients attained pre-dialysis serum potassium (sK⁺) concentrations of 4.0-5.0 and 4.0-5.5 mmol/L; potassium gradient (the difference between pre-dialysis sK⁺ and dialysate potassium) at days 36, 43, 50, and 57, and change from baseline to the end of treatment (EOT) using categories of potassium gradient (1 to < 2, 2 to < 3, 3 to < 4, and ≥ 4 mmol/L).

RESULTS

A greater proportion of patients achieved the ranges of pre-dialysis sK⁺ concentration with SZC versus placebo for ≥1, ≥ 2, ≥ 3, and 4 LIDI visits over 4 weeks; 23.7 and 48.5% of patients in the SZC group achieved pre-dialysis sK⁺ concentrations of 4.0-5.0 and 4.0-5.5 mmol/L, respectively, at all 4 LIDI visits. Baseline mean potassium gradient was similar with SZC and placebo. At day 57, mean (standard deviation) potassium gradient was 2.78 (0.08) mmol/L with SZC and 3.52 (0.08) mmol/L with placebo; mean difference (95% confidence interval) was - 0.74 mmol/L (- 0.97 to - 0.52). A greater reduction in potassium gradient category from baseline towards lower-risk categories at EOT was observed with SZC versus placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses expand our knowledge of the spectrum of potassium responses with SZC in hyperkalemic hemodialysis patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03303521 .

Low dialysis potassium bath is associated with lower mortality in end-stage renal disease patients admitted to hospital with severe hyperkalemia

Background

Hyperkalemia is a modifiable risk factor for sudden cardiac death, a leading cause of mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The optimal treatment of hyperkalemia in hospitalized end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients is nonexistent in literature, which has prompted studies from outpatient dialysis to be extrapolated to inpatient care. The goal of this study was to determine if low-potassium dialysate 1 mEq/L is associated with higher mortality in hospitalized ESRD patients with severe hyperkalemia (serum potassium >6.5 mmol/L).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of all adult ESRD patients admitted with severe hyperkalemia between January 2011 and August 2016.

Results

There were 209 ESRD patients on HD admitted with severe hyperkalemia during the study period. Mean serum potassium was 7.1 mmol/L. In-hospital mortality or cardiac arrest in ESRD patients with severe hyperkalemia was 12.4%. Median time to dialysis after serum potassium result was 2.0 h (25, 75 interquartile range 0.9, 4.2 h). Totally, 47.4% of patients received dialysis with 1 mEq/L concentration potassium bath. The use of 1 mEq/L potassium bath was associated with significantly lower mortality or cardiac arrest in ESRD patients admitted with severe hyperkalemia (odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.09–0.80, P = 0.01).

Conclusion

We conclude that use of 1 mEq/L potassium bath for treatment of severe hyperkalemia (>6.5 mmol/L) in hospitalized ESRD patients is associated with decreased in-hospital mortality or cardiac arrest.

Dyselectrolytemia-management and implications in hemodialysis (Review)

Hemodialysis is a method for the renal replacement therapy followed by series of acute and chronic complications. Dyselectrolytemia appears in patients undergoing dialysis through mechanisms related to the chronic kidney disease and/or to the dialysis therapy and for this group of patients it is associated with an increase of morbidity and mortality. The dialysate has a standard composition, which can be modified according to the patient's characteristics. During hemodialysis patients are exposed to 18,000-36.000 litres of water/year, and the water purity along with the biochemical composition of the dialysate are essential. The individualization of the dialysis prescription is recommended for each patient and it has an important role in preventing the occurrence of dyselectrolyemia. The individualization of the treatment prescription according to the blood constants of each patient is the prerogative of the nephrologist and the association of the electrolyte imbalances with the patients cardiovascular mortality explains the importance of paying special attention to them.

Hemodialysis treatment in patients with severe electrolyte disorders: Management of hyperkalemia and hyponatremia

Significant deviations of serum potassium and sodium levels are frequently observed in hospitalized patients and are both associated with increased all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality. The presence of acute or chronic renal failure facilitates the pathogenesis and complicates the clinical management. In the absence of reliable outcome data in the context of dialysis prescription, requirement of renal replacement therapy in patients with severe electrolyte disturbances constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Recommendations for intradialytic management are based on pathophysiologic reasoning and clinical observations only, and as such, heterogeneous and limited to expert opinion level. This article reviews current strategies for the management of severe hyperkalemia and hyponatremia in hemodialysis patients.

Fluctuations in plasma potassium in patients on dialysis

Plasma potassium concentration is maintained in a narrow range to avoid deleterious electrophysiologic consequences of both abnormally low and high levels. This is achieved by redundant physiologic mechanisms, with the kidneys playing a central role in maintaining both short-term plasma potassium stability and long-term total body potassium balance. In patients with end-stage renal disease, the lack of kidney function reduces the body’s ability to maintain normal physiologic potassium balance. Routine thrice-weekly dialysis therapy achieves long-term total body potassium mass balance, but the intermittent nature of dialytic therapy can result in wide fluctuations in plasma potassium concentration and consequently contribute to an increased risk of arrhythmogenicity. Various dialytic and nondialytic interventions can reduce the magnitude of these fluctuations, but the impact of such interventions on clinical outcomes remains unclear.

Serum-to-dialysate potassium gradient and its association with short-term outcomes in hemodialysis patients

Background

A high serum-to-dialysate potassium (K+) gradient at the start of dialysis leads to rapid lowering of serum K+ and may confer a greater risk of adverse events. Here, we examined the near-term association of K+ gradient with clinical outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective (2010-11) event-based study considered 830 741 patient-intervals, each defined by a pre-dialysis measurement of serum K+ made among adult Medicare Parts A and B enrollees who received in-center hemodialysis on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday schedule at a large US dialysis organization. K+ gradient was considered based on the difference in K+ concentration (serum-dialysate) on the date of measurement; analyses accounted for multiple observations per patient. Outcomes considered were: all-cause and cardiovascular hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) visits and deaths.

Results

Higher K+ gradient was associated with younger age, greater fistula use, lower comorbidity scores and better nutritional indices. Adjusting for patient differences, there was a dose-response relationship between higher K+ gradient and greater risks of all-cause hospitalization and ED visit. A similar trend was seen for cardiovascular hospitalization but did not achieve statistical significance. No associations were observed with mortality, potentially due to a low number of events.

Conclusions

Higher K+ gradient is independently associated with greater risk of all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions that reduce the K+ gradient ameliorate this risk.

Dialysate potassium concentration: Should mass balance trump electrophysiology?

Nephrologists are faced with a difficult dilemma in choosing the ideal dialysis prescription to maintain neutral potassium mass balance. Should potassium mass balance goals prioritize the normalization of serum potassium levels using low potassium dialysate at the expense of provoking intradialytic arrhythmias, or should mass balance goals favor permissive hyperkalemia using higher dialysate potassium to avoid rapid intradialytic fluxes at the risk of more interdialytic arrhythmias? This review examines the factors that determine potassium mass balance among HD patients, the relationships between serum and dialysate potassium levels and outcomes, and concludes by examining currently available approaches to reducing risk of arrhythmias while managing potassium mass balance.

Dialysate Potassium, Dialysate Magnesium, and Hemodialysis Risk

One of the fundamental goals of the hemodialysis prescription is to maintain serum potassium levels within a narrow normal range during both the intradialytic and interdialytic intervals. Considering the extraordinarily high rate of cardiovascular mortality in the hemodialysis population, clinicians are obligated to explore whether factors related to dialytic potassium removal can be modified to improve clinical outcomes. Observational studies and circumstantial evidence suggest that extreme concentrations of serum and dialysate potassium can trigger cardiac arrest. In this review, we provide an overview of factors affecting overall potassium balance and factors modulating potassium dialysate fluxes in dialysis, and we review data linking serum and dialysate potassium concentrations with arrhythmias, cardiovascular events, and mortality. We explore potential interactions between serum and dialysate magnesium levels and risks associated with dialysate potassium levels. Finally, we conclude with proposed dialytic and novel nondialytic approaches to optimize outcomes related to potassium homeostasis in patients on hemodialysis. Dialysis clinicians need to consider changes in the overall clinical scenario when choosing dialysate potassium concentrations, and an effective change in practice will require more frequent serum potassium monitoring and responsive dialysis care teams.

Treatment of Severe Hyperkalemia: Confronting 4 Fallacies

Severe hyperkalemia is a medical emergency that can cause lethal arrhythmias. Successful management requires monitoring of the electrocardiogram and serum potassium concentrations, the prompt institution of therapies that work both synergistically and sequentially, and timely repeat dosing as necessary. It is of concern then that, based on questions about effectiveness and safety, many physicians no longer use 3 key modalities in the treatment of severe hyperkalemia: sodium bicarbonate, sodium polystyrene sulfonate (Kayexalate [Concordia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Oakville, ON, Canada], SPS [CMP Pharma, Farmville, NC]), and hemodialysis with low potassium dialysate. After reviewing older reports and newer information, I believe that these exclusions are ill advised. In this article, I briefly discuss the treatment of severe hyperkalemia and detail why these modalities are safe and effective and merit inclusion in the treatment of severe hyperkalemia.

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for the Management of Acid-Base and Electrolyte Imbalances in Acute Kidney Injury

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is used to manage electrolyte and acid-base imbalances in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Although a standard solution and prescription is acceptable in most clinical circumstances, specific disorders may require a tailored approach such as adjusting fluid composition, regulating CRRT dose, and using separate intravenous infusions to mitigate and correct these disturbances. Errors in fluid prescription, compounding, or delivery can be rapidly fatal. This article provides an overview of the principles of acid-base and electrolyte management using CRRT.

We Use Dialysate Potassium Levels That Are Too Low in Hemodialysis

Sudden cardiac death accounts for a quarter of all deaths in hemodialysis patients. While this group is at high risk for cardiovascular events, there are certain modifiable factors that have been associated with higher risk of sudden cardiac death. These include short dialysis time, high ultrafiltration rate, and dialysate with a low potassium or calcium concentration. While it is impossible to discern the relative contribution of each of these factors, our review focuses on the role of dialysate potassium concentration in sudden cardiac death. Retrospective studies have identified low potassium dialysate (<2-3 mEq/l) as a risk factor for sudden cardiac death, particularly in patients with predialysis serum potassium concentrations <5 mEq/l. However, patients with predialysis hyperkalemia (≥5.5 mEq/l) may be an exception since a significant association of low potassium dialysate with sudden cardiac death was not observed in this subgroup. Dialysis prescribers must employ alternatives to low dialysate potassium concentrations to achieve potassium control such as increasing dialysis time and frequency, dietary restriction of potassium, prevention and treatment of constipation, discontinuation of medications contributing to hyperkalemia and traditional (or newer, better tolerated) potassium binding resins. Finally, one must also address other factors associated with sudden cardiac death such as short dialysis time, high ultrafiltration rate, and low calcium concentration dialysate.

Optimizing haemodialysate composition

Survival and quality of life of dialysis patients are strictly dependent on the quality of the haemodialysis (HD) treatment. In this respect, dialysate composition, including water purity, plays a crucial role. A major aim of HD is to normalize predialysis plasma electrolyte and mineral concentrations, while minimizing wide swings in the patient's intradialytic plasma concentrations. Adequate sodium (Na) and water removal is critical for preventing intra- and interdialytic hypotension and pulmonary edema. Avoiding both hyper- and hypokalaemia prevents life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Optimal calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) dialysate concentrations may protect the cardiovascular system and the bones, preventing extraskeletal calcifications, severe secondary hyperparathyroidism and adynamic bone disease. Adequate bicarbonate concentration [HCO₃⁻] maintains a stable pH in the body fluids for appropriate protein and membrane functioning and also protects the bones. An adequate dialysate glucose concentration prevents severe hyperglycaemia and life-threating hypoglycaemia, which can lead to severe cardiovascular complications and a worsening of diabetic comorbidities.

A neglected issue in dialysis practice: haemodialysate

The intended function of dialysate fluid is to correct the composition of uraemic blood to physiologic levels, both by reducing the concentration of uraemic toxins and correcting electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities. This is accomplished principally by formulating a dialysate whose constituent concentrations are set to approximate normal values in the body. Sodium balance is the cornerstone of intradialysis cardiovascular stability and good interdialytic blood pressure control; plasma potassium concentration and its intradialytic kinetics certainly play a role in the genesis of cardiac arrhythmias; calcium is related to haemodynamic stability, mineral bone disease and also cardiac arrhythmias; the role of magnesium is still controversial; lastly, acid buffering by means of base supplementation is one of the major roles of dialysis. In conclusion, learning about the art and the science of fashioning haemodialysates is one of the best ways to further the understanding of the pathophysiologic processes underlying myriad acid-base, fluid, electrolyte as well as blood pressure abnormalities of the uraemic patient on maintenance haemodialysis.

Disaster nephrology: a new concept for an old problem

Natural and man-made mass disasters directly or indirectly affect huge populations, who need basic infrastructural help and support to survive. However, despite the potentially negative impact on survival chances, these health care issues are often neglected by the authorities.

Treatment of both acute and chronic kidney diseases (CKDs) is especially problematic after disasters, because they almost always require complex technology and equipment, whereas specific drugs may be difficult to acquire for the treatment of the chronic kidney patients. Since many crush victims in spite of being rescued alive from under the rubble die afterward due to lack of dialysis possibilities, the terminology of ‘renal disaster’ was introduced after the Armenian earthquake. It should be remembered that apart from crush syndrome, multiple aetiologies of acute kidney injury (AKI) may be at play in disaster circumstances.

The term ‘seismonephrology’ (or earthquake nephrology) was introduced to describe the need to treat not only a large number of AKI cases, but the management of patients with CKD not yet on renal replacement, as well as of patients on haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis and transplanted patients. This wording was later replaced by ‘disaster nephrology’, because besides earthquakes, many other disasters such as hurricanes, tsunamis or wars may have a negative impact on the ultimate outcome of kidney patients.

Disaster nephrology describes the handling of the many medical and logistic problems in treating kidney patients in difficult circumstances and also to avoid post-disaster chaos, which can be made possible by preparing medical and logistic scenarios. Learning and applying the basic principles of disaster nephrology is vital to minimize the risk of death both in AKI and CKD patients.

Low dialysate potassium concentration: an overrated risk factor for cardiac arrhythmia?

Serum potassium concentrations rise with dietary potassium intake between dialysis sessions and are often at hyperkalemic levels by the next session. Conversely, potassium concentrations fall during each hemodialysis, and sometimes reach hypokalemic levels by the end. Low potassium dialysate, which rapidly decreases serum potassium and often brings it to hypokalemic levels, is almost universally considered a risk factor for life-threatening arrhythmias. While there is little doubt about the threat of lethal arrhythmias due to hyperkalemia, convincing evidence for the danger of low potassium dialysate and rapid or excess potassium removal has not been forthcoming. The original report of more frequent ventricular ectopy in early dialysis that was improved by reducing potassium removal has received very little confirmation from subsequent studies. Furthermore, the occurrence of ventricular ectopy during dialysis does not appear to predict mortality. Studies relating sudden deaths to low potassium dialysate are countered by studies with more thorough adjustment for markers of poor health. Dialysate potassium concentrations affect the excursions of serum potassium levels above or below the normal range, and have the potential to influence dialysis safety. Controlled studies of different dialysate potassium concentration and their effect on mortality and cardiac arrests have not been done. Until these results become available, I propose interim guidelines for the setting of dialysate potassium levels that may better balance risks and benefits.

Hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients

Hyperkalemia contributes significantly to high mortality among ESRD patients. Excess intake and inadequate removal are the most common etiologies in HD patients. Although dialysis is the definitive treatment, classical medical therapy must be employed as a temporizing measure to acutely lower serum potassium. Reducing potassium intake through dietetic/nutritional support is critical to reducing the K+ load in ESRD patients and preventing this condition.

Potassium balance in dialysis patients

The advent of dialytic therapy has enabled nephrologists to provide life-saving therapy, but potassium balance continues to be an ever present challenge in the ESRD population. Although a small percent of patients are chronically hypokalemic, hyperkalemia is by far the most common abnormality in dialysis patients. It is associated with increased all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and arrhythmogenic death. Although alterations of the dialysis bath may decrease predialysis potassium, potassium baths <2 mEq/l are associated with a higher risk of sudden cardiac death. Studies show that patients are aware of the risks of hyperkalemia, but adherence to a low potassium diet is suboptimal. ACEI, ARBs, and spironolactone may cause slight increases in potassium even in anuric patients, requiring increased surveillance. Fludrocortisone and potassium binders have not been proven to be beneficial in lowering interdialytic potassium levels. Frequent hemodialysis may be a viable option, and studies of prophylactic placement of implantable cardioverter/defibrillators are underway.

Sailing between Scylla and Charybdis: the high serum K-low dialysate K quandary

In HD patients, the optimal choice of dialysate K concentration is of paramount importance. Recent large observational studies have documented an association between low dialysate K concentration (< 2 or even <3 mEq/L) and a higher risk of sudden death. In this review, we first briefly discuss the available data concerning the link between hypokalemia and negative outcomes in non-CKD populations, especially after an acute myocardial infarction or in congestive heart failure. We next review the pathophysiology of the arrhythmogenic effect related to K fluxes during HD and discuss the dialytic strategies aiming at making potassium fall more gradual and thus at reducing the electrical disturbances triggered by the HD session. We conclude with practical recommendations regarding the optimal choice of K bath and the importance of more frequent monitoring of serum K in some clinical scenarios.

Prediction and management of hyperkalemia across the spectrum of chronic kidney disease

Hyperkalemia commonly limits optimizing treatment to slow stage 3 or higher chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. The risk of hyperkalemia is linked to dietary potassium intake, level of kidney function, concomitant diseases that may affect potassium balance such as diabetes, and use of medications that influence potassium excretion. The risk predictors for developing hyperkalemia are an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and a serum potassium level greater than 4.5 mEq/L in the absence of blockers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Generally, monotherapy with RAAS blockers does not increase risk substantially unless hypotension or volume depletion occur. Dual RAAS blockade involving any combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin-receptor blocker, renin inhibition, or aldosterone-receptor blocker markedly increases the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with stage 3 or higher CKD. Moreover, dual RAAS blockade further reduces albuminuria by 25% to 30% compared with monotherapy, it has failed to show a benefit on CKD progression or cardiovascular outcome, and thus is not indicated in such patients because of its marked increase in hyperkalemia potential. Although sodium polystyrene resins exist to manage hyperkalemia in patients requiring therapy that increases serum potassium levels, they are not well tolerated. Newer, more predictable, better-tolerated polymers to bind potassium are on the horizon and may be approved within the next 1 to 2 years.

Standardising dialysate potassium does not increase patient risk

BACKGROUND

Rapid intradialytic potassium shifts during haemodialysis have been associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Standardising dialysate potassium to 2 mmol/l may decrease the potassium shift.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of standardising dialysate potassium to 2 mmol/l for all chronic dialysis treatments.

DESIGN

Pre- and post-intervention comparison of monthly serum potassium.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-seven individuals, of whom 56 patients could be matched across both data collection periods.

METHODS

Serum potassium data were categorised based on a target range 3.5-6.0 mmol/l. Overall pre- and post-intervention mean scores were compared using a paired samples t-test. Data for patients routinely prescribed dialysate potassium 1 mmol/l pre-intervention (n = 6) underwent paired samples t-test to compare their mean serum potassium pre- and post-intervention.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant change in serum potassium post-intervention. The majority of patients remained within the target range, including the subset of patients who had a history of high serum potassium during the pre-intervention period.

CONCLUSIONS

A standard potassium dialysate of 2 mmol/l may reduce intradialytic serum potassium shifts and may assist in standardising safer work practices.

Treatment and pathogenesis of acute hyperkalemia

This article focuses on the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and various treatment modalities for acute hyperkalemia and presents a systematic approach to selecting a treatment strategy. Hyperkalemia, a life-threatening condition caused by extracellular potassium shift or decreased renal potassium excretion, usually presents with non-specific symptoms. Early recognition of moderate to severe hyperkalemia is vital in preventing fatal cardiac arrhythmias and muscle paralysis. Management of hyperkalemia includes the elimination of reversible causes (diet, medications), rapidly acting therapies that shift potassium into cells and block the cardiac membrane effects of hyperkalemia, and measures to facilitate removal of potassium from the body (saline diuresis, oral binding resins, and hemodialysis). Hyperkalemia with potassium level more than 6.5 mEq/L or EKG changes is a medical emergency and should be treated accordingly. Treatment should be started with calcium gluconate to stabilize cardiomyocyte membranes, followed by insulin injection, and b-agonists administration. Hemodialysis remains the most reliable method to remove potassium from the body and should be used in cases refractory to medical treatment. Prompt detection and proper treatment are crucial in preventing lethal outcomes.

The management of hyperkalemia in patients with cardiovascular disease

The development of hyperkalemia is common in patients with cardiac and kidney disease who are administered drugs that antagonize the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). As the results of large-scale clinical trials in hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure demonstrate benefits of RAAS blockade alone or, in some cases, in combination therapies, the incidence of hyperkalemia has increased in clinical practice. Although there is potential for adverse events in the presence of hyperkalemia, there also are potential benefits of RAAS blockers that support their use in high-risk patient populations. Management of hyperkalemia may be improved by identifying the levels of potassium that may potentially induce harm and using appropriate strategies to avert the levels that may be dangerous or life threatening.

Management of hyperkalemia in dialysis patients

Hyperkalemia is common in patients with end-stage renal disease, and may result in serious electrocardiographic abnormalities. Dialysis is the definitive treatment of hyperkalemia in these patients. Intravenous calcium is used to stabilize the myocardium. Intravenous insulin and nebulized albuterol lower serum potassium acutely, by shifting it into the cells. Despite their widespread use, neither intravenous bicarbonate nor cation exchange resins are effective in lowering serum potassium acutely. Prevention of hyperkalemia currently rests largely upon dietary compliance and avoidance of medications that may promote hyperkalemia. Prolonged fasting may provoke hyperkalemia, which can be prevented by administration of intravenous dextrose.

Potassium disorders—clinical spectrum and emergency management

Potassium disorders are common and may precipitate cardiac arrhythmias or cardiopulmonary arrest. They are an anticipated complication in patients with renal failure, but may also occur in patients with no previous history of renal disease. They have a broad clinical spectrum of presentation and this paper will highlight the life-threatening arrhythmias associated with both hyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia. Although the medical literature to date has provided a foundation for the therapeutic options available, this has not translated into consistent medical practice. Treatment algorithms have undoubtedly been useful in the management of other medical emergencies such as cardiac arrest and acute asthma. Hence, we have applied this strategy to the treatment of hyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia which may prove valuable in clinical practice.

Emergency interventions for hyperkalaemia

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalaemia occurs in outpatients and in between 1% and 10% of hospitalised patients. When severe, consequences include arrhythmia and death.

OBJECTIVES

To review randomised evidence informing the emergency (i.e. acute, rather than chronic) management of hyperkalaemia

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (1966-2003), EMBASE (1980-2003), The Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2003), and SciSearch using the text words hyperkal* or hyperpotass* (* indicates truncation). We also searched selected journals and abstracts of meetings. The reference lists of recent review articles, textbooks, and relevant papers were reviewed for additional potentially relevant titles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All selection was performed in duplicate. Articles were considered relevant if they were randomised, quasi-randomised or cross-over randomised studies of pharmacological or other interventions to treat non-neonatal humans with hyperkalaemia, reporting on clinically-important outcomes, or serum potassium levels within the first six hours of administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All data extraction was performed in duplicate. We extracted quality information, and details of the patient population, intervention, baseline and follow-up potassium values. We extracted information about arrhythmias, mortality and adverse effects. Where possible, meta-analysis was performed using random effects models.

MAIN RESULTS

None of the studies of clinically-relevant hyperkalaemia reported mortality or cardiac arrhythmias. Reports focussed on serum potassium levels. Many studies were small, and not all intervention groups had sufficient data for meta-analysis to be performed. On the basis of small studies, inhaled beta-agonists, nebulised beta-agonists, and intravenous (IV) insulin-and-glucose were all effective, and the combination of nebulised beta agonists with IV insulin-and-glucose was more effective than either alone. Dialysis is effective. Results were equivocal for IV bicarbonate. K-absorbing resin was not effective by four hours, and longer follow up data on this intervention were not available from RCTs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Nebulised or inhaled salbutamol, or IV insulin-and-glucose are the first-line therapies for the management of emergency hyperkalaemia that are best supported by the evidence. Their combination may be more effective than either alone, and should be considered when hyperkalaemia is severe. When arrhythmias are present, a wealth of anecdotal and animal data suggests that IV calcium is effective in treating arrhythmia. Further studies of the optimal use of combination treatments and of the adverse effects of treatments are needed.

The faster potassium-lowering effect of high dialysate bicarbonate concentrations in chronic haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalaemia is common in patients with advanced renal disease. In this double-blind, randomized, three-sequence, crossover study, we compared the effect of three dialysate bicarbonate concentrations ([HCO3-]) on the kinetics of serum potassium (K+) reduction during a conventional haemodialysis (HD) session in chronic HD patients.

METHODS

We studied eight stable HD patients. The choice of dialysate [HCO3-] followed a previously assigned treatment protocol and the [HCO3-] used were low bicarbonate (LB; 27 mmol/l), standard bicarbonate (SB; 35 mmol/l) and high bicarbonate (HB; 39 mmol/l). Polysulphone dialysers and automated machines provided blood flow rates of 300 ml/min and dialysis flow rates of 500 ml/min for each HD session. Blood samples were drawn at 0 (baseline), 15, 30, 60 and 240 min from the arterial extracorporeal line to assess blood gases and serum electrolytes. In three of the eight patients, we measured serum K+ 1 h post-dialysis as well as K+ removal by the dialysis. The same procedures were followed until the completion of the three arms of the study, with a 1 week interval between each experimental arm.

RESULTS

Serum K+ decreased from 5.4+/-0.26 (baseline) to 4.96+/-0.20, 4.90+/-0.19, 4.68+/-0.13 and 4.24+/-0.15 mmol/l at 15, 30, 60 and 240 min, respectively, with LB; from 5.38+/-0.21 to 5.01+/-0.23, 4.70+/-0.25, 4.3+/-0.15 and 3.8+/-0.19 mmol/l, respectively, with SB; and from 5.45+/-0.25 to 4.79+/-0.17, 4.48+/-0.17, 3.86+/-0.16 and 3.34+/-0.11 mmol/l, respectively, with HB (P<0.05 for high vs standard and low [HCO3-] at 60 and 240 min). The decrease in serum K+ correlated with the rise in serum [HCO3-] in all but LB (P<0.05). Potassium rebound was 3.9+/-10.2%, 5.2+/-6.6% and 8.9+/-4.9% for LB, SB and HB dialysates, respectively (P=NS), while total K+ removal (mmol/dialysis) was 116.4+/-21.6 for LB, 73.2+/-12.8 for SB and 80.9+/-15.4 for HB (P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

High dialysate [HCO3-] was associated with a faster decrease in serum K+. Our results strongly suggest that this reduction was due to the enhanced shifting of K+ from the extracellular to the intracellular fluid compartment rather than its removal by dialysis. This finding could have an impact for those patients with life-threatening pre-HD hyperkalaemia.

Hypertension but Not Sodium Intake Determines Progression of Renal Failure in Experimentally Uremic Rats

BACKGROUND/AIMS

High sodium intake is implicated in contributing to progression of chronic renal failure. We studied the effect of high sodium consumption on progression of rat experimental renal failure while sodium-induced hypertension was pharmacologically controlled.

METHODS

64 Sprague-Dawley rats underwent 5/6 nephrectomy. Subsequently, they were divided in three groups which were fed either low, normal, or high sodium diet. Only the high sodium-consuming group developed hypertension. This group was further divided in two subgroups in which hypertension was either untreated or titrated to normotension by hydralazine alone or with propranolol.

RESULTS

Sequential GFR values did not differ between the respective normotensive groups. Survival downslopes of all three normotensive groups (including the pharmacologically treated, high sodium-consuming subgroup) were also similar, extending over 10 weeks. By contrast, pharmacologically untreated animals exhibited severe hypertension and 100% mortality within 3 weeks. In all experimental groups, 24-hour urinary sodium excretion paralleled sodium intake. Proteinuria rose similarly and significantly in all animals on high sodium. A significant correlation between 24-hour sodium and proteinuria was evident throughout the experimental period.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) In 5/6 nephrectomized rats, renal function deterioration was not affected by dietary sodium, provided hypertension was pharmacologically controlled. (2) Enhanced proteinuria secondary to high sodium consumption had no adverse effect on progression of renal failure in this model.

Hyperkalemia in dialysis patients

Serious hyperkalemia is common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and accounts for considerable morbidity and death. Mechanisms of extrarenal disposal of potassium (gastrointestinal excretion and cellular uptake) play a crucial role in the defense against hyperkalemia in this population. In this article we review extrarenal potassium homeostasis and its alteration in patients with ESRD. We pay particular attention to the factors that influence the movement of potassium across cell membranes. With that background we discuss the emergency treatment of hyperkalemia in patients with ESRD. We conclude with a review of strategies to reduce the risk of hyperkalemia in this population of patients.