Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: study design and baseline characteristics of the IMPACT SHPT study

Effect of calcium supplementation on severe hypocalcemia in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism after total parathyroidectomy

BACKGROUND

Severe hypocalcemia (SH) is a dreaded complication of total parathyroidectomy (TPTX) without auto-transplantation.

AIM

To compare conventional and preventive calcium supplementation (CS) regimens in terms of SH occurrence after TPTX.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent TPTX between January 2015 and May 2018 at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital. From January 2015 to May 2016, conventional CS was performed in patients who underwent TPTX, with calcium amounts adjusted according to postoperative serum calcium levels. From October 2016 to May 2018, preventive CS was performed according to preoperative alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. The patients were defined as low-risk (ALP < 500 U/L) and high-risk (ALP > 500 U/L) for SH. All preoperative blood samples were collected in the fasting state on the day before surgery. Postoperative blood samples were obtained at 6-7 AM from the first postoperative day.

RESULTS

A total of 271 patients were included. These patients were 47.7 ± 11.1 years old, and 57.6% were male. Their mean body mass index (BMI) was 22.9 ± 3.8 kg/m². There were no significant differences in sex, age, BMI, preoperative ALP, serum calcium, serum phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus ratio, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) between the two CS groups. Compared with conventional CS, preventive CS led to lower occurrence rates of hypocalcemia within 48 h (46.0% vs 74.5%, P < 0.001) and SH (31.7% vs 64.1%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that preoperative iPTH levels [odds ratio (OR) = 1.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.000-1.001, P = 0.009), preoperative ALP amounts (OR = 1.002, 95%CI: 1.001-1.003, P = 0.002), preoperative serum phosphorus levels (OR = 8.729, 95%CI: 1.518-50.216, P = 0.015) and preventive CS (OR = 0.132, 95%CI: 0.067-0.261, P < 0.001) were independently associated with SH. In patients with preoperative ALP ≥ 500 U/L, only preventive CS (OR = 0.147, 95%CI: 0.038-0.562. P = 0.005) was independently associated with SH.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that preventive CS could reduce the occurrence of SH, indicating its critical value for hypocalcemia after TPTX.

Total parathyroidectomy with forearm autotransplantation in secondary hyperparathyroidism patients: analysis of muscle, subcutaneous and muscle + subcutaneous method

Background

Forearm autotransplantation after parathyroidectomy has turned into the standard method for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) treatment in chronic kidney disease patients. Our study aimed to explore the effects of three methods including muscle, subcutaneous and muscle + subcutaneous transplant methods on SHPT.

Methods

Seventy five SHPT patients were enrolled and assigned into the muscle + subcutaneous (M + S) (n = 26), muscle (M) (n = 35), and subcutaneous (S) (n = 14) groups. The operation efficacy evaluation included preoperative and postoperative biological characteristics such as parathyroid hormone (PTH), serum phosphorus, serum calcium and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The data were recorded from pre-operation time point to 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 month (mo) postoperation periods. After operation, short-form health survey (SF-36) scores was made for life quality identification at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24 time points. Symptoms about SHPT including bone pain, fracture, pruritus, and coronary artery calcification were followed-up based on the scale.

Results

Compared with the preoperative record, all the M + S, M, and S groups showed postoperative decreased levels of PTH, serum phosphorus, serum calcium, calcium-phosphorus. In M + S group, the PTH and serum calcium level kept more steady compared with the M and S groups during a 24 mo duration observation. After this, a SF-36 score scale which represents the life quality show M + S group got more scores at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 mo points. At last, the incidence of SHPT associated symptoms including Bone pain, Fracture, Pruritus, and Coronary artery calcification in M + S group were decreased compared with M and S groups at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 mo post-operation time points.

Conclusion

M + S seems to be an efficient method for medical treatment of SHPT patients in the control of PTH and serum calcium. This mixed transplant strategy improves the biochemical characterizes compared with M and S groups in SHPT patients. Furthermore, the M + S method make beneficial on clinical outcomes and life quality of patients.

Risk factors predicting severe hypocalcemia after total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism

Objective

This study was performed to investigate the risk factors for severe hypocalcemia (SH) after total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation (TPTX) in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 136 patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism treated by TPTX. The patients were categorized as having SH or non-SH based on their postoperative blood calcium concentration. The risk factors for SH were identified by comparing the clinical characteristics between the two groups and by performing multiple logistic regression analyses.

Results

After surgery, 46.0% of the patients had hypocalcemia and 31.7% had SH. Evidence of renal osteodystrophy on lumbar radiographs and the serum concentrations of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), calcium, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were different between the two groups. The SH group had higher preoperative iPTH and ALP concentrations than the non-SH group. In addition, more patients with SH showed renal osteodystrophy. Logistic regression analyses indicated that preoperative hypocalcemia and a high ALP concentration were independent predictors of SH.

Conclusion

Preoperative hypocalcemia and a high ALP concentration were identified as risk factors for SH following TPTX.

Cinacalcet plus vitamin D versus vitamin D alone for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients undergoing dialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common and serious complication of chronic kidney disease, particularly in end-stage renal disease. Currently, both cinacalcet and vitamin D are used to treat SHPT via two different mechanisms, but it is still unclear whether the combination use of these two drugs can be a safe and effective alternative to vitamin D alone. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of cinacalcet plus vitamin D in the treatment of SHPT.

METHODS

Four electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science, were searched for eligible publications. All randomized-controlled trials comparing cinacalcet plus vitamin D with vitamin D alone in SHPT patients undergoing dialysis were included. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model or fixed-effects model. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by removing any one study successively to estimate the stability of the pooled results, and subgroup analysis was carried out to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, and funnel plots were used to test publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 8 randomized-controlled trials involving 1480 patients were included in the study. Compared with vitamin D treatment, the combination use of cinacalcet and vitamin D significantly lowered serum calcium (MD - 0.82, 95% CI - 1.02 to - 0.61, P < 0.001), phosphorus (MD - 0.57, 95% CI - 0.97 to - 0.18, P = 0.005), and calcium × phosphorus product (MD - 9.41, 95% CI - 10.00 to - 8.82, P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in serum parathyroid hormone (PTH, MD 43.99, 95% CI - 49.22 to 137.20, P = 0.35), ≥ 30% reduction in PTH (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.69-1.52, P = 0.91), and PTH achieve 150-300 pg/ml (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.68-1.15, P = 0.35). Moreover, the combination therapy did not increase the risk of all adverse events, all-cause mortality, diarrhea, muscle spasms, and headache (all P > 0.05), but had a higher risk of hypocalcemia (RR 17.98, 95% CI 5.68-56.99, P < 0.001), and nausea or vomiting (RR 3.47, 95% CI 2.25-5.35, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with vitamin D alone, the combination use of cinacalcet and vitamin D significantly lowered serum calcium, phosphorus, and the calcium × phosphorus product, and did not increase the risk of all adverse events, all-cause mortality, diarrhea, muscle spasms, and headache, whereas had no effect on serum PTH and increased the risk of hypocalcemia and nausea or vomiting. Future studies are needed to assess the effects of cinacalcet plus vitamin D on PTH level, cardiovascular events, and other clinical outcomes in larger samples with longer durations.

Efficacy and safety of cinacalcet and active vitamin D in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis

Background

We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cinacalcet, active vitamin D and cinacalcet plus active vitamin D in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) and Wanfang databases. In total, eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1,443 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. Pairwise meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the compliance of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), Ca, P, etc., and the mortality and safety of cinacalcet plus active vitamin D and active vitamin D alone. Then, NMA was used to estimate the safety and efficacy of the administration of active vitamin D and different drugs in the control group.

Results

The results of the pairwise meta-analysis revealed that compared with active vitamin D monotherapy, cinacalcet plus active vitamin D did not improve the survival of patients but significantly improved the blood calcium compliance rate [relative risk (RR) =1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.51-2.21, P<0.00001]. Furthermore, it is worth noting that compared with the corresponding incidence with other treatments, the incidence of vomiting was significantly increased with cinacalcet plus active vitamin D treatment (RR =2.07, 95% CI: 1.18-3.65, P=0.01). Through direct and indirect comparisons, the NMA revealed the following results: (I) compared with oral or intravenous (IV) administration of vitamin D, the solely oral administration of active vitamin D increased mortality, and (II) cinacalcet monotherapy increased the risk of hypocalcemia, and that risk was even higher for cinacalcet plus active vitamin D. However, the results should be treated with caution because the prediction interval (PrI) crossed the invalid line.

Conclusions

This pairwise meta-analysis and NMA provided a comprehensive analysis of the currently utilized CKD-SHPT treatment interventions. This network identified some highly ranked interventions through analyses that were included in a small number of trials; these interventions merit further examination on a larger scale in the context of well-designed RCTs.

Factors associated with parathyroid hormone control in haemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism treated with cinacalcet in real-world clinical practice: Mimosa study

Background

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is frequent in haemodialysis (HD) patients. Oral cinacalcet-hydrochloride (HCl) decreases parathyroid hormone (PTH); however, real-life PTH data, according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, are still lacking. Our goal is to assess the percentage of cinacalcet-HCl-treated HD patients with controlled SHPT (PTH <9× upper limit of the normal range) after 12 months (M12) of treatment.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study in HD patients with SHPT treated by cinacalcet-HCl between 2005 and 2015 and dialysed in seven French HD centres using the same database (Hemodial™).

Results

The study included 1268 patients with a mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 21 ± 12 months. Their mean dialysis vintage was 4.3 ± 5.6 years. PTH values were available and exploitable at M12 in 50% of them (645 patients). Among these patients, 58.9% had controlled (mean PTH of 304 ± 158 pg/mL) and 41.1% uncontrolled SHPT (mean PTH of 1084 ± 543) at M12. At the baseline, patients with controlled SHPT were older (66 ± 15 versus 61 ± 17 years), and had lower PTH (831 ± 346 versus 1057 ± 480 pg/mL) and calcaemia (2.18 ± 0.2 versus 2.22 ± 0.19 mmol/L) than uncontrolled patients. In multivariate analysis, these three factors still remained significantly associated with controlled SHPT.

Conclusion

In this real-life study, 41.1% of HD patients with SHPT treated with cinacalcet-HCl remained with a PTH above the KDIGO recommended target after 12 months of treatment. Apart from the possibility of non-compliance, the severity of SHPT appears to be a major factor determining the response to cinacalcet-HCl treatment, reinforcing the importance of treating SHPT at earlier stages.

Three Therapeutic Strategies: Cinacalcet, Paricalcitol or Both in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment in Hemodialysed Patients During 1-Year Observational Study-A Comparison

Introduction: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) is a common hormonal complication of chronic kidney disease. There are several therapeutic options for sHPT management aiming at calcium-phosphorus balance normalization and decrease of parathormone secretion. Objectives: The aim of this retrospective, observational study was the outcome assessement of three most common therapeutic strategies of secondary hyperparathyroidism treatment with vitamin D receptor activator-paricalcitol, calcimimetic-cinacalcet or both agents administered together during in 12-months period. Methods: One hundred and thirty-one haemodialysed patients with uncontrolled parathyroid hormone secretion have been treated with paricalcitol administered intravenously (group PAR-60 patients) or cinacalcet per os (group CIN-50 patients). The last group (group PAR+CIN-21 patients) received paricalcitol i.v. and oral cinacalcet administered simultaneously. Results: In all groups, the iPTH level decreased significantly, however in group 1 treated with paricalcitol administered intravenously iPTH level decrease was greater than in group 2 treated with cinacalcet and in group 3 treated with paricalcitol and cinacalcet in parallel. The most substantial change of iPTH level was noticed after 3-months of observation. After this period the iPTH level was stabilized and maintained till the end of observation. Safety level of all strategies was comparable. No severe hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia was observed during the whole period of observation. Conclusions: The results of observation show significant advantage of intravenous paricalcitol treatment. Complementing cinacalcet therapy with paricalcitol does not improve treatment outcomes. In case of unsatisfactory results after 3-months treatment, potential continuation should be considered carefully. Among three available therapeutic options, the treatment with paricalcitol i.v. should be considered in all haemodialysed patients with inadequate control of serum PTH level. The second option-with cinacalced administered orally should be considered in PD patients and when severe hypercalcemia occurs.

[Utilization of alfacalcidol and active vitamin D analogs in chronic kidney disease]

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is one of the most frequent and deleterious complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). SHPT is also one of the principal components of the now called CKD-mineral and bone disorders (MBD) syndrome. It is usually prevented and treated by vitamin D derivatives. However, the rationale for the prescription of vitamin D sterols in those patients is still a matter of hotly debates, mainly because of unsatisfactory results from numerous observational and not well-controlled studies. Scanty clinical data on head-to-head comparisons between the multiple vitamin D sterols are currently available. Moreover, there is crescent expectations on nutritional vitamin D, as well as vitamin D receptor activators (VDRA), regarding their putative pleiotropic effects even in CKD patients, and the promising effects of VDRA against proteinuria and myocardial hypertrophy in diabetic CKD cohorts. Nevertheless, additional randomized controlled trials (RCT) are needed to answer to many open questions and incertitude considering the effect of nutritional vitamin D and VDRA on hard end points including the risk of skeletal fractures and of mortality in CKD patients. RCT comparing VDRA to calcimimetics in the control of SHPT are also needed in dialysis patients. The present review will visit these open questions that nephrologists should ask before starting a treatment by nutritional vitamin D or VDRA.

Total parathyroidectomy with forearm auto-transplantation improves the quality of life and reduces the recurrence of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

Our study aims to explore the effect of total parathyroidectomy (PTX) with forearm autotransplantation (FAT) on the quality of life and recurrence of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in chronic kidney disease patients.

METHODS

A total of 104 chronic kidney disease patients with SHPT were enrolled and divided into the PTX (n = 62) and PTX + FAT (n = 42) groups. The operation efficacy was evaluated by analyzing preoperative and postoperative values, including levels of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), serum phosphorus, serum calcium, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), calcium-phosphorus product, signs and symptoms, and MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) scores. Moreover, complications and recurrences were followed up for 12 months after the operation. Binary logistic regression was to present the risk factors for the recurrence of chronic kidney disease patients with SHPT.

RESULTS

Compared with the preoperative values, the PTX and PTX + FAT groups showed decrease postoperative levels of iPTH, serum phosphorus, serum calcium, calcium-phosphorus product, bone pain, and skin pruritus at all time periods. The PTX and PTX + FAT groups demonstrated decreased ALP, fracture or deformity, and coronary artery calcification at 1 month, decreased short stature at 3 months after the operation but increased SF-36 score after operation. Compared with the PTX group, the level of iPTH decreased and the levels of serum calcium, calcium-phosphorus product increased at 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation in the PTX + FAT group. The levels of ALP, fracture or deformity, short stature, and SF-36 decreased separately at 1 week and 6 and 12 months after the operation, along with the decrease of coronary artery calcification and the recurrence rate, respectively, at 6 and 12 months after the operation in the PTX + FAT group when compared with those in the PTX group. Logistic regression analysis evidenced that the preoperative iPTH level, SF-36 score, and operation type were the risk factors for the recurrence of chronic kidney disease with SHPT.

CONCLUSION

Total PTX combined with FAT is more effective in improving the quality of life and reducing the recurrence of chronic kidney disease with SHPT than PTX alone.

Calcimimetics for secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

Calcimimetic agents lower abnormal serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in people who have chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the benefits and harms on patient-level outcomes are uncertain. Since this review was first published in 2006 showing that evidence for calcimimetics was largely restricted to biochemical outcomes, additional studies have been conducted. This is an update of a review first published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of cinacalcet on patient-level outcomes in adults with CKD.

SEARCH METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and conference proceedings were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating any calcimimetic against placebo or another agent in adults with CKD (persistent albuminuria > 30 mg/g with or without reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (below 60 mL/min/1.73 m²)). We updated searches to 7 February 2013 including the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to complete this update.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all RCTs of a calcimimetic administered to patients with CKD for the treatment of elevated serum PTH levels.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted on all relevant patient-centred and surrogate outcomes. We summarised treatment estimates using random effects and expressed treatment effects as a risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen studies (7446 participants) compared cinacalcet in addition to standard therapy with no treatment or placebo plus standard therapy. In adults with GFR category G5 (GFR below 15 mL/min/1.73 m²) treated with dialysis, routine cinacalcet treatment had little or no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.05), imprecise effects on cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.16 to 2.87), and prevented surgical parathyroidectomy (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.59) and hypercalcaemia (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.97), but increased hypocalcaemia (RR 6.98, 95% CI 5.10 to 9.53), nausea (RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.81) and vomiting (RR 1.97, 95% CI 95% CI 1.73 to 2.24). Cinacalcet decreased serum PTH (MD -281.39 pg/mL, 95% CI -325.84 to -234.94) and calcium (MD -0.87 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.77) levels, but had little or no effect on serum phosphorous levels (MD -0.23 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.58 to 0.12).Data were sparse for adults with GFR categories G3a to G4 (GFR 15 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m²) and kidney transplant recipients.Overall, based on GRADE criteria, evidence for cinacalcet in adults with GFR category G5 treated with dialysis (mortality, parathyroidectomy, hypocalcaemia, and nausea) is of high or moderate quality. High quality evidence suggests "further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of treatment effect" and moderate quality evidence is "further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate". Information for adults with less severe CKD GFR category G3a to G4 is of low or very low quality. This means that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Routine cinacalcet therapy reduced the need for parathyroidectomy in adults treated with dialysis and elevated PTH levels but does not improve all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. Cinacalcet increases risks of nausea, vomiting and hypocalcaemia, suggesting harms may outweigh benefits in this population.

Cost effectiveness of paricalcitol versus cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients in the USA

Background

The IMPACT SHPT [Improved Management of Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) with Paricalcitol-Centered Therapy Versus Cinacalcet Therapy with Low-Dose Vitamin D in Hemodialysis Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism] study compared the effectiveness of paricalcitol and cinacalcet in the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients but did not report the costs or cost effectiveness of these treatments.

Aim

The aim of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of a paricalcitol-based regimen versus cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients from a US payer perspective, using a 1-year time horizon.

Methods

This was a post hoc cost-effectiveness analysis of data collected for US patients enrolled in the IMPACT SHPT study—a 28-week, randomized, open-label, phase 4, multinational study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00977080). Patients eligible for the IMPACT SHPT study were aged ≥18 years with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, had been receiving maintenance haemodialysis three times weekly for at least 3 months before screening and were to continue haemodialysis during the study. Only US patients who reached the evaluation period (weeks 21–28) were included in this secondary analysis. US subjects in the IMPACT SHPT study were randomly assigned to receive intravenous paricalcitol, or oral cinacalcet plus fixed-dose intravenous doxercalciferol, for 28 weeks. Patients in the paricalcitol group could also receive supplemental cinacalcet for hypercalcaemia. The primary effectiveness endpoint in the IMPACT SHPT study was the proportion of subjects who achieved a mean intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level of 150–300 pg/mL during the evaluation period. In this secondary analysis, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), comparing paricalcitol-treated patients with cinacalcet-treated patients on the basis of this primary endpoint and several secondary endpoints. Costs were estimated by examining the dosage of the study drug (paricalcitol or cinacalcet) and phosphate binders used by each participant during the trial. Nonparametric bootstrap analysis was used to examine the accuracy of the ICER point estimates.

Results

The percentages of patients achieving the treatment goal of a mean iPTH level between 150–300 pg/mL during weeks 21–28 of therapy were 56.9 % in the paricalcitol group and 34.0 % in the cinacalcet group (a difference of 23 %, p = 0.0235). Paricalcitol was also more effective for each of the secondary endpoints. When annualized, the total drug costs were US$10,153 in the paricalcitol group and US$15,967 in the cinacalcet group, a difference of US$5,814 (57.3 %, p = 0.0053). Because the paricalcitol-based treatment was less expensive and more effective, it was ‘dominant’, compared with cinacalcet, in this cost-effectiveness analyses. In our bootstrap analysis, 99.1 % of bootstrap replicates for the ICER of the primary endpoint fell within the lower right quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane—where paricalcitol is considered dominant. For all of the other endpoints, paricalcitol was dominant in 100 % of replicates.

Conclusion

On the basis of dosing and effectiveness data from US patients in the IMPACT SHPT study, we found that a regimen of intravenous paricalcitol was more cost effective than cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D in the management of iPTH in patients with SHPT requiring haemodialysis.

Paricalcitol- or cinacalcet-centred therapy affects markers of bone mineral disease in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT-SHPT study

BACKGROUND

In this Phase 4 international study, efficacy and safety of paricalcitol-centred therapy were compared with that of cinacalcet-centred therapy for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients undergoing haemodialysis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00977080).

METHODS

Patients ≥ 18 years of age with Stage 5 CKD and SHPT [intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level of 300-800 pg/mL, calcium level of 8.4-10.0 mg/dL and phosphate concentration of ≤ 6.5 mg/dL] who were undergoing haemodialysis were included. Patients were randomized by mode of paricalcitol administration [i.e. intravenous (IV) or oral strata] to receive paricalcitol- or cinacalcet-centred therapy for ≤ 28 weeks. Changes in metabolic markers [total alkaline phosphatase (AP), bone-specific AP and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23)] and the proportion of patients in each treatment group who achieved an iPTH level of 150-300 pg/mL during Weeks 8, 16 and 21-28 as a composite value were evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared with cinacalcet-centred therapy, levels of both bone turnover markers were significantly reduced from baseline with IV and oral paricalcitol-centred treatment (P < 0.05 for both dosing strata) at Weeks 8, 16 and 28. Levels of FGF-23 were increased with paricalcitol versus cinacalcet-centred treatment. A greater proportion of patients receiving paricalcitol-centred therapy achieved target iPTH levels (i.e. 150-300 pg/mL) throughout the study in the IV and oral dosing strata compared with patients receiving cinacalcet-centred treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CKD and SHPT undergoing haemodialysis, paricalcitol-centred therapy reduced circulating bone turnover markers and iPTH levels and increased FGF-23 levels compared with cinacalcet-centred treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00977080.

Paricalcitol treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients: a German-Austrian, single-arm, open-label, prospective, noninterventional, observational study

BACKGROUND

Safety and efficacy of paricalcitol in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) was investigated under routine clinical practice in German and Austrian dialysis centers.

METHODS

Hemodialysis patients with sHPT initiating intravenous paricalcitol were enrolled in this noninterventional study regardless of concomitant sHPT treatment. Prior active vitamin D therapy was discontinued. Clinical laboratory values, including intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), total serum calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), Ca × P product, and alkaline phosphatase (AP), were recorded for 6 months following initiation of paricalcitol treatment.

RESULTS

1,313 patients (Austria, n = 280; Germany, n = 1,033) from 169 dialysis centers were enrolled. Most patients (n = 932; 79.1%) had received dialysis for ≥1 year. Median iPTH fell from 518.9 pg/ml [55.0 pmol/l] at baseline to 264.0 pg/ml [28.0 pmol/l] after 6 months (p < 0.0001). After 6 months of treatment, ≥30 and ≥60% reductions in iPTH were observed in 63.0 and 35.9% of patients, respectively. At 6 months, 27.2% of patients achieved iPTH levels between 150 and <300 pg/ml [15.9 and <31.8 pmol/l] compared with 9.7% at baseline. Ca, P, and Ca × P levels remained stable in the majority of patients. AP levels declined from a median of 98 U/l at baseline to 83 U/l (p < 0.0001) at 6 months. Monitoring of adverse events and clinical laboratory assessments identified no unexpected safety signals for paricalcitol.

CONCLUSIONS

Paricalcitol is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for the control of iPTH levels in hemodialysis patients with sHPT. The results of this study support the results of previous trials under real-time clinical practice conditions in Austria and Germany.

Comparative cost analysis of management of secondary hyperparathyroidism with paricalcitol or cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D in hemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this analysis was to compare costs of paricalcitol or cinacalcet plus low dose vitamin D, and of phosphate binders, in patients in the IMPACT SHPT study; and to extrapolate those to estimate expected annual maintenance costs.

METHODS

IMPACT SHPT was a 28-week, randomized, open-label trial. Subjects from 12 countries received intravenous (IV) or oral paricalcitol, or oral cinacalcet plus fixed IV doxercalciferol or oral alfacalcidol. The primary end-point was the proportion of subjects who achieved a mean intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) value of 150-300 pg/mL during weeks 21-28 (evaluation period). This study compares the costs of study drugs and phosphate binders among participants during the study and annualized. This analysis includes only those subjects that reached the evaluation period (134 in each group).

RESULTS

The mean total drug costs over the study period were €2606 (SD = €2000) in the paricalcitol group and €3034 (SD = €3006) in the cinacalcet group (difference €428, p = 0.1712). The estimated annualized costs were €5387 (SD = €4139) in the paricalcitol group and €6870 (SD = €6256) in the cinacalcet group (difference €1492, p = 0.0395). In addition, a significantly greater proportion (p = 0.010) of subjects in the paricalcitol arm (56.0%) achieved an iPTH of 150-300 pg/mL during the evaluation period compared to the cinacalcet arm (38.2%).

LIMITATIONS

This was a secondary analysis of the IMPACT SHPT study which was not designed or powered for costs as an outcome. The dosing of study drugs and phosphate binders in the IMPACT study may not reflect actual practice, and patients were followed for 28 weeks, while the treatment of SHPT is long-term.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SHPT requiring hemodialysis who were treated with a paricalcitol-based regimen for iPTH control had lower estimated annual drug costs compared to those treated with cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D.

Which vitamin D in CKD-MBD? The time of burning questions

Vitamin D is a common treatment against secondary hyperparathyroidism in renal patients. However, the rationale for the prescription of vitamin D sterols in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is rapidly increasing due to the coexistence of growing expectancies close to unsatisfactory evidences, such as (1) the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proving the superiority of any vitamin D sterol against placebo on patients centered outcomes, (2) the scanty clinical data on head to head comparisons between the multiple vitamin D sterols currently available, (3) the absence of RCTs confirming the crescent expectations on nutritional vitamin D pleiotropic effects even in CKD patients, (4) the promising effects of vitamin D receptors activators (VDRA) against proteinuria and myocardial hypertrophy in diabetic CKD cohorts, and (5) the conflicting data on the impact on mortality of VDRA versus calcimimetic centered regimens to control CKD-MBD. The present review arguments these issues focusing on the opened questions that nephrologists should consider dealing with the prescription of nutritional vitamin D or VDRA and with the choice of a VDRA versus a calcimimetic based regimen in CKD-MBD patients.

Save life and improve quality: report from the 5th Congress of International Society for Hemodialysis

The 5th congress of International Society for Hemodialysis took place last August 3-5, 2012 at the Grand Hotel in Taipei and focused on "Save Life and Improve Quality." It attracted a total of 927 participants from 18 countries. The full spectrum of hemodialysis was covered with plenary lectures and symposiums delivered by experts from different subspecialties in nephrology starting from the history of hemodialysis, mineral bone disease, microinflammation and advanced techniques in hemodialysis. It was followed by critical care in nephrology, anemia, and nutrition in dialysis. Last but not the least, natural disasters and medical economics in hemodialysis were also discussed extensively. This special article will highlight the authentic contributions and innovative clinical presentations from the meeting.

Safety and tolerability of paricalcitol in patients with chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Beyond skeletal complications, uncontrolled SHPT is associated with cardiovascular mortality. Vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs) are a mainstay of therapy for SHPT; however, use is limited by hypercalcemia, though less so with calcitriol analogs such as paricalcitol and there is emerging experience with oral formulations for non-SHPT indications. The role of VDRAs in the treatment of SHPT becomes a complex question as alternative strategies have developed.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes trials that established the safety and efficacy of paricalcitol for SHPT. Comparative experience with paricalcitol as against other VDRAs will be reviewed as will the experience with paricalcitol in non-dialysis CKD and comparative experience with non-VDRA-based therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

VDRA therapy is considered first-line therapy for treatment of SHPT. Paricalcitol has demonstrated superiority to calcitriol with respect to parathyroid hormone suppression and calcium-phosphorus balance. Oral formulations of paricalcitol appear to be similarly effective for SHPT. While there is evidence to suggest adjunctive antiproteinuria benefit with the use of VDRAs, efficacy of these agents to slow the progression of CKD or to reduce cardiovascular risk has not yet been demonstrated.

The efficacy of cinacalcet combined with conventional therapy on bone and mineral metabolism in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism: a meta-analysis

Cinacalcet, the first calcimimetic to be approved for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in the chronic kidney disease patients, offers a novel therapeutic approach to SHPT. The aim of this meta-analysis is to access the efficacy and safety of cinacalcet on bone and mineral metabolism disorders in the dialysis patients with SHPT. Randomized controlled trials on cinacalcet combined with vitamin D and/or phosphate binders in the dialysis patients with SHPT were identified in Pubmed, Sciencedirect, and the Cochrane library. Data were analyzed with RevMan software. We compared the proportion of patients achieving the biochemical targets recommended by the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines and the incidence of adverse events between the cinacalcet and control groups. Six trials involving 2,548 patients were included. A greater proportion of patients in the cinacalcet group compared with the conventional group achieved the KDOQI targets. The relative risks (RRs) were parathyroid hormone (PTH) (RR = 3.51, 95 % CI: 2.38-5.17), calcium (RR = 2.04, 95 % CI: 1.76-2.37), phosphorus (RR = 1.15, 95 % CI: 0.83-1.60), and calcium-phosphorus product (Ca × P) (RR = 1.41, 95 % CI: 1.18-1.69), the number of patients simultaneously achieving the KDOQI targets for PTH + Ca × P was also greater (RR = 3.89, 95 % CI: 2.36-6.41), with p < 0.001 for each. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and hypocalcemia, which had a higher incidence in the cinacalcet group, but were usually mild to moderate in severity and transient. Compared with conventional therapy, treatment with cinacalcet results in more patients achieving KDOQI targets and offers an effective and safety therapeutic option for controlling mineral and bone disorders in the dialysis patients with SHPT.

Efficacy of cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D in incident haemodialysis subjects with secondary hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND

Treatment with cinacalcet improves the control of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) and the achievement of calcium and phosphorus targets. Most data come from subjects receiving cinacalcet after several years of dialysis treatment. We therefore compared the efficacy of treatment with cinacalcet and low doses of active vitamin D to flexible doses of active vitamin D alone for the management of SHPT in patients recently initiating haemodialysis.

METHODS

This open-label trial randomized subjects (n = 309) with parathyroid hormone (PTH) >300 pg/mL on dialysis for 3-12 months to either cinacalcet with low-dose active vitamin D, if prescribed (cinacalcet); or usual care without cinacalcet (control). Randomized subjects were stratified by PTH at screening (300-450, >450-600, >600 pg/mL) and by the use of active vitamin D at enrolment. Treatment duration was 12 months, with primary efficacy endpoint (mean PTH reduction ≥ 30% from baseline) assessed at 6 months.

RESULTS

The mean [standard deviation (SD)] haemodialysis vintage at enrolment was 7.2 (2.7) months; 53% of subjects were not receiving active vitamin D at enrolment. There was a significant difference in the achievement of the primary endpoint (≥ 30% PTH reduction at 6 months) between cinacalcet-treated subjects and controls in both the entire cohort (63 versus 38%; n = 304; P < 0.0001) and the subgroup of subjects not receiving active vitamin D at enrolment (70 versus 44%; n = 161; P < 0.01). Hypocalcaemia and gastrointestinal adverse events were more commonly observed in cinacalcet-treated subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that cinacalcet with low-dose active vitamin D, if prescribed, provides a more effective treatment approach than usual care without cinacalcet for SHPT in incident haemodialysis patients, even in relatively treatment-naive patients.

Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) has not been defined. The IMPACT SHPT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00977080) study assessed whether dose-titrated paricalcitol plus supplemental cinacalcet only for hypercalcaemia is superior to cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D in controlling intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels in patients with SHPT on haemodialysis.

METHODS

In this 28-week, multicentre, open-label Phase 4 study, participants were randomly selected to receive paricalcitol or cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D. Randomization and analyses were stratified by mode of paricalcitol administration [intravenous (IV) or oral]. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects who achieved a mean iPTH value of 150-300 pg/mL during Weeks 21-28.

RESULTS

Of 272 subjects randomized, 268 received one or more dose of study drug; 101 in the IV and 110 in the oral stratum with two or more values during Weeks 21-28 were included in the primary analysis. In the IV stratum, 57.7% of subjects in the paricalcitol versus 32.7% in the cinacalcet group (P = 0.016) achieved the primary end point. In the oral stratum, the corresponding proportions of subjects were 54.4% for paricalcitol and 43.4% for cinacalcet (P = 0.260). Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analysis, controlling for stratum, revealed overall superiority of paricalcitol (56.0%) over cinacalcet (38.2%; P = 0.010) in achieving iPTH 150-300 pg/mL during Weeks 21-28. Hypercalcaemia occurred in 4 (7.7%) and 0 (0%) of paricalcitol-treated subjects in the IV and oral strata, respectively. Hypocalcaemia occurred in 46.9% and 54.7% of cinacalcet-treated subjects in the IV and oral strata, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D provided superior control of iPTH, with low incidence of hypercalcaemia.

Lipids, blood pressure, kidney - what was new in 2011?

The year 2011 was very interesting regarding new studies, trials and guidelines in the field of lipidology, hypertensiology and nephrology. Suffice it to mention the new European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines on the management of dyslipidaemias, American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines on hypertension in the elderly, and many important trials presented among others during the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Annual Congress in Philadelphia and the AHA Annual Congress in Orlando. The paper is an attempt to summarize the most important events and reports in the mentioned areas in the passing year.