Differences in initial treatment modality for end-stage renal disease among glomerulonephritis subtypes in the USA

Clinical Characteristics and Histopathology in Adults With Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Rationale & Objective

Few data are available regarding histological features at the time of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) diagnosis among diverse real-world populations. This study describes clinical and histological characteristics and correlates of histological disease severity in adults with FSGS who underwent a clinical kidney biopsy.

Study Design

Real-world cohort study with data derived from health records.

Setting & Participants

Adults with FSGS by kidney biopsies from Arkana Laboratories from January 1, 2016 to May 31, 2020.

Exposure

Race, chronic kidney disease stage, nephrotic proteinuria, age, sex, and hypertension.

Outcomes

Severe histological disease, defined as global glomerulosclerosis in >50% of glomeruli and >25% interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA).

Analytical Approach

Demographic, clinical, and histological characteristics were compared between race groups. Correlates of severe disease were analyzed using multiple logistic regression.

Results

Among 2,011 patients with FSGS, 40.6% were White, and 23.6% Black. White patients were older (52.8 vs 45.5 years, P < 0.001) with a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) than Black patients (53.5 vs 43.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.001). A higher proportion of Black patients had global glomerulosclerosis ≥50% (32.1% vs 14.6%, P < 0.001) or IFTA >50% (34.6% vs 14.7%, P < 0.001). Severe histological disease was more likely in Black patients (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.59-3.79; P < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients with nephrotic than nonnephrotic proteinuria exhibited diffuse foot process effacement.

Limitations

Unequal representation across United States regions, missing demographic and clinical data, and lack of data on primary versus secondary FSGS, treatments, or outcomes.

Conclusions

Black patients were more frequently diagnosed at younger age with lower eGFR and more severe histological disease compared with White patients. Timelier identification of FSGS could increase the opportunity for therapeutic intervention, especially for high-risk patients, to mitigate disease progression and complications.

Plain-Language Summary

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) accounts for around one-quarter of diagnoses derived from clinical kidney biopsies in the United States. Limited data are available regarding the classes and distribution of histological features at FSGS diagnosis among diverse real-world populations. Analyzing data from US patients who underwent kidney biopsy and were diagnosed with FSGS, we showed that up to half of patients had features of severe histological disease. Of this overall population, Black patients were more frequently diagnosed at a younger age but with more severe histological disease than White patients. The work highlights the need for timelier diagnosis of FSGS to enable intervention at an earlier disease stage.

Prevalence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Incidental IgA Glomerular Deposits in Donor Kidneys

Introduction

Incidental IgA deposits in donor kidneys have unknown sequelae and may predate clinical kidney disease if primed by adverse immunologic or hemodynamic stimuli or may remain dormant.

Methods

The presence of incidental IgA in post-implantation (T₀) biopsies from living (LDK) and deceased donor (DDK) kidneys, and its relationship to post-transplant patient and graft outcomes was investigated in an ethnically diverse US population at a large transplant center.

Results

Mesangial IgA was present in 20.4% of 802 T₀ biopsies; 13.2% and 24.5% of LDK and DDK, respectively. Donors with incidental IgA deposits were more likely to have hypertension and be of Hispanic or Asian origin. Intensity of IgA staining was 1+ (57.3%), 2+ (26.8%), or 3+ (15.8%) of the T₀ IgA+ biopsies. Mesangial pathology correlated with higher-intensity IgA staining with less clearance on follow-up (53.8%) versus 79.2% without mesangial pathology. IgA cleared in 91%, 63%, and 40% of follow-up biopsies with 1+, 2+, and 3+ IgA staining, respectively. Early post-transplant rejection and rejection-related graft loss occurred more frequently in IgA+ kidney recipients; however, 5-year kidney function and graft survival were comparable to kidneys without IgA.

Conclusion

This first and largest report of incidental IgA in T₀ biopsies of LDK and DDK in a US ethnically diverse population demonstrated no adverse association between the presence of IgA in donor kidneys and graft or patient survival. Whether IgA in donor kidneys represents latent IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is uncertain; nevertheless, living donors who demonstrate IgA on T₀ biopsy deserve careful follow-up.

Spatiotemporal trends and prognosis of end-stage renal disease patients with biopsy-proven immunoglobulin A nephropathy in France from 2010 to 2014

Background

Although end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is frequently used as an outcome marker for primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), the clinical course after reaching ESRD is not well documented. This study examined patients’ characteristics and survival in ESRD-related biopsy-proven IgAN in France.

Methods

French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network Registry data from 2010 to 2014 were used to analyse patients’ survival and outcome in incident ESRD patients >16 years of age with biopsy-proven primary IgAN, in comparison with other primary and secondary glomerulonephritis (GN), adult polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) or diabetes. Multivariable survival analysis was adjusted for age, sex, time on dialysis and comorbidities.

Results

Among 17 138 incident dialysis patients with ESRD, IgAN (242.8/10 000 dialysis initiation) represents the most common GN related to ESRD during 2010. IgAN patients were the youngest, and had the fewest comorbidities and the highest use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) (17%). In comparison with the haemodialysis group, hazard ratios for death were not different in the preemptive transplantation group [0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17–1.28] and in the PD group (0.77, 95% CI 0.44–1.33). Mortality rates in IgAN patients with preemptive transplantation and in those receiving dialysis waiting for transplantation were 2.9% (95% CI 0.0–5.6) and 6.7% (95% CI 0.9–12.3). Mortality rates of ADPKD patients receiving dialysis waiting for transplantation were higher (18%, 95% CI 3.1–30.6).

Conclusion

IgAN has the best prognosis among primary and secondary GN. IgAN patients receiving dialysis waiting transplantation seem to have a more favourable prognosis than ADPKD patients, who usually comprise the reference population. The underlying reasons for the difference in access treatment modalities should be investigated to improve survival with respect to renal disease.

Methodological considerations in comparing access to Pre-emptive renal transplantation between SLE and other ESRD causes in the USRDS

BACKGROUND

We compared pre-emptive transplant rates between SLE and non-SLE end-stage renal disease (ESRD) from the U.S. Renal Data System (USRDS) and investigated the potential influence of frequency matching and primary ESRD causes in the non-SLE group.

METHODS

4830 adult SLE patients with incident ESRD from USRDS 2005-2009 were frequency matched by age, sex and race to 4830 patients with incident non-SLE ESRD. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of pre-emptive transplantation in SLE and non-SLE, and with the non-SLE subgroups by primary ESRD cause.

RESULTS

The odds ratios (OR) of receiving a pre-emptive transplant were similar among non-SLE and SLE (referent group): OR = 1.18 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.50; p = 0.20). However, the ORs for receiving a pre-emptive transplant were 0.19 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.42) in type 2 diabetes ESRD, 0.42 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.75) for hypertension-associated ESRD, 1.67 (95% CI: 1.10, 2.54) in type 1 diabetes ESRD, and 2.06 (95% CI: 1.55, 2.73) for "other" ESRD. In contrast to non-SLE, younger SLE patients were less likely to receive a pre-emptive transplant than older SLE patients.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study provide compelling evidence that major improvements need to be made in optimizing access to pre-emptive transplantation in SLE by addressing sociodemographic disparities and the unique challenges faced by SLE patients. Applying careful matching and selecting appropriate comparison groups in future studies may facilitate the development of effective strategies to address these barriers and to increase the number of pre-emptive renal transplants among SLE patients.

Association of Peritonitis with Hemodialysis Catheter Dependence after Modality Switch

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Few studies have evaluated vascular access use after transition from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis. Our study characterizes vascular access use after switch to hemodialysis and its effect on patient mortality and evaluates whether a peritonitis event preceding the switch was associated with the timing of permanent vascular access placement and use.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The US Renal Data System data were used to evaluate the establishment of a permanent vascular access in 1165 incident Medicare-insured adult patients on dialysis who initiated peritoneal dialysis between July 1, 2010 and June 30, 2011 and switched to hemodialysis within 1 year.

RESULTS

The proportions of patients using a hemodialysis catheter were 85% (744 of 879), 76% (513 of 671), and 51% (298 of 582) at 30, 90, and 180 days, respectively, after the switch from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis. Patients who switched from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis with a previous peritonitis episode were more likely to dialyze with a catheter at 30 days (90% [379 of 421] versus 80% [365 of 458]; P=0.03), 90 days (82% [275 of 334] versus 71% [238 of 337]; P=0.03), and 180 days (57% [166 of 289] versus 45% [132 of 293]; P=0.04) after the switch and less likely to dialyze with an arteriovenous fistula at 30 days (8% [32 of 421] versus 16% [73 of 458]; P=0.01), 90 days (13% [42 of 334] versus 23% [76 of 337]; P=0.03), and 180 days (31% [91 of 289] versus 43% [126 of 293]; P=0.04). Patients using a permanent vascular access 180 days after switching from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis had better adjusted survival during the ensuing year than those using a catheter (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 1.00; P=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who switch from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis, prior peritonitis is associated with a higher rate of persistent hemodialysis catheter use, which in turn, is associated with lower patient survival. Studies addressing vascular access planning and implementation are needed in this group of patients.

Differences in Initial Hemodialysis Vascular Access Use Among Glomerulonephritis Subtypes in the United States

BACKGROUND

The type of vascular access used for hemodialysis affects patient morbidity and mortality. Whether vascular access types differ by glomerulonephritis (GN) subtype in the US hemodialysis population has not been investigated.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We identified all adult (aged ≥ 18 years) patients within the US Renal Data System who initiated hemodialysis therapy from July 2005 through December 2011 with a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease attributed to any of 4 primary (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, immunoglobulin A nephropathy [reference group], membranous nephropathy, and membranoproliferative GN) or 2 secondary (lupus nephritis and vasculitis) GN subtypes.

PREDICTOR

GN subtype.

OUTCOMES

ORs with 95% CIs for arteriovenous fistula versus central venous catheter (CVC) use and for arteriovenous graft versus CVC use were computed using multinomial logistic regression, with adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, comorbidity, and duration of nephrology care covariates.

RESULTS

Among 29,015 patients, CVC use at initiation of hemodialysis therapy was substantially higher in patients with lupus nephritis (89.2%) or vasculitis (91.2%) compared with patients with primary GN subtypes (72.7%-79.8%). After adjustment and compared with patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy, patients with lupus nephritis or vasculitis were as likely to have used an arteriovenous graft (ORs of 0.94 [95% CI, 0.70-1.27] and 0.80 [95% CI, 0.56-1.13], respectively) but significantly less likely to have used an arteriovenous fistula (ORs of 0.66 [95% CI, 0.57-0.76] and 0.54 [95% CI, 0.45-0.63], respectively), whereas patients with any comparator primary GN subtype were at least as likely to have used either of these 2 access types.

LIMITATIONS

Potential misclassification of exposure; residual confounding by unmeasured covariates; inability to determine causes of observed associations; lacking longitudinal data for vascular access use.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in vascular access distributions at initiation of hemodialysis therapy are apparent among GN subtypes. The unacceptably high use of CVCs in patients with lupus nephritis and vasculitis is particularly concerning. Further studies are needed to identify any potentially modifiable factors underlying these findings.