1
|
Faba OR, Boissier R, Budde K, Figueiredo A, Hevia V, García EL, Regele H, Zakri RH, Olsburgh J, Bezuidenhout C, Breda A. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Transplantation: Update 2024. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00217-7. [PMID: 39489684 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2024] [Revised: 09/30/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The European Association of Urology (EAU) Panel on Renal Transplantation released an updated version of the renal transplantation (RT) guidelines. This report aims to present the 2024 EAU guidelines on RT. METHODS A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise covering all areas of RT guidelines published between May 31, 2020 and April 1, 2023 was performed. Databases covered by the search included Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Libraries. Previous guidelines were updated, and levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were assigned. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS It is strongly recommended to offer pure or hand-assisted laparoscopic/retroperitoneoscopic surgery for living donor nephrectomy. One should not base decisions regarding the acceptance of a donor organ on histological findings alone, since this might lead to an unnecessary high rate of discarded grafts. For the ureterovesical anastomosis, a Lich-Gregoir-like extravesical technique protected by a ureteral stent is the preferred technique. A list of RT patients with a history of appropriately treated low-stage/grade renal cell carcinoma or prostate cancer should be made without additional delay. In the potential donor kidney, the main surgical tumoral approach is ex vivo tumor excision and finally transplantation. It is also strongly recommended to perform initial rejection prophylaxis with a combination therapy of a calcineurin inhibitor (preferably tacrolimus), mycophenolate, steroids, and an induction agent (either basiliximab or antithymocyte globulin). The long version of the guidelines is available at the EAU website (www.uroweb.org/guidelines). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS These abridged EAU guidelines present updated information on the clinical and surgical management of RT for incorporation into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY The European Association of Urology has released the renal transplantation guidelines. Implementation of minimally invasive surgery for organ retrieval and the latest evidence on transplant surgery as well as on immunosuppressive regimens are key to minimizing rejection and achieving long-term graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Rodríguez Faba
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Puigvert, University Autonoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Romain Boissier
- Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation, La Conception University Hospital, Assistance-Publique Marseille, France
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arnaldo Figueiredo
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Vital Hevia
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Alcalá University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Lledó García
- Department of Urology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Heinz Regele
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rhana Hassan Zakri
- Department of Urology and Transplant, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Jonathon Olsburgh
- Department of Urology and Transplant, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust Hospitals, London, UK
| | | | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Puigvert, University Autonoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Edginton O, George M, Bandara C, Johnston M, Rao A, Howse M, Ridgway D, Goldsmith P. Renal transplantation in older adults: retrospective cohort study to examine the impact of the new 2019 kidney offering scheme on older adult transplant recipients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024. [PMID: 39377692 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/09/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2019, a new kidney offering scheme was launched in the United Kingdom, aiming to better match estimated patient survival and graft life expectancy. The scheme's impact on older patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) is unknown. This study aims to compare the outcomes of older adult KT recipients before and after introduction of the 2019 scheme. METHODS A retrospective observational cohort study of older adults who underwent KT was undertaken. Group 1 were transplanted between 1 September 2017 and 31 August 2019 (2006 allocation scheme) and group 2 between 1 September 2019 and 31 August 2021 (2019 offering scheme). An older adult was any person ≥60 years old at the time of KT. Univariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS There were 107 older adult deceased donor KT recipients, 62 from group 1 and 45 from group 2. Median age at transplantation was 68 (interquartile range [IQR] 62-71) and 67 (IQR 64-73) years, respectively. Univariable analysis showed that re-intervention (OR 6.486, 95% CI 1.306-32.216, p = 0.022) and critical care admission (OR 5.619, 95% CI 1.448-21.812, p = 0.013) were significantly more likely in group 2. Group 2 recipients were significantly more likely to have a level 4 human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch (OR 4.667, 95% CI 1.640-13.275, p = 0.004) and to have undergone previous KT (OR 4.691, 95% CI 1.385-15.893, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS The introduction of the 2019 offering scheme was associated with re-intervention and critical care admission for older KT recipients. We also observed less-favourable HLA matches but more KT in difficult-to-match groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - C Bandara
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - M Johnston
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - A Rao
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - M Howse
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - D Ridgway
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - P Goldsmith
- University of Liverpool, UK
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jallah BP, Kuypers DRJ. Impact of Immunosenescence in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: Associated Clinical Outcomes and Possible Risk Stratification for Immunosuppression Reduction. Drugs Aging 2024; 41:219-238. [PMID: 38386164 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01100-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
The number of older individuals receiving a kidney transplant as replacement therapy has significantly increased in the past decades and this increase is expected to continue. Older patients have a lower rate of acute rejection but an increased incidence of death with a functioning graft. Several factors, including an increased incidence of infections, post-transplant malignancy and cardiovascular comorbidity and mortality, contribute to this increased risk. Notwithstanding, kidney transplantation is still the best form of kidney replacement therapy in all patients with chronic kidney disease, including in older individuals. The best form of immunosuppression and the optimal dose of these medications in older recipients remains a topic of discussion. Pharmacological studies have usually excluded older patients and when included, patients were highly selected and their numbers insignificant to draw a reasonable conclusion. The reduced incidence of acute rejection in older recipients has largely been attributed to immunosenescence. Immunosenescence refers to the aging of the innate and adaptive immunity, accumulating in phenotypic and functional changes. These changes influences the response of the immune system to new challenges. In older individuals, immunosenescence is associated with increased susceptibility to infectious pathogens, a decreased response after vaccinations, increased risk of malignancies and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Chronic kidney disease is associated with premature immunosenescent changes, and these are independent of aging. The immunosenescent state is associated with low-grade sterile inflammation termed inflammaging. This chronic low-grade inflammation triggers a compensatory immunosuppressive state to avoid further tissue damage, leaving older individuals with chronic kidney disease in an immune-impaired state before kidney transplantation. Immunosuppression after transplantation may further enhance progression of this immunosenescent state. This review covers the role of immunosenescence in older kidney transplant recipients and it details present knowledge of the changes in chronic kidney disease and after transplantation. The impact of immunosuppression on the progression and complications of an immunosenescent state are discussed, and the future direction of a possible clinical implementation of immunosenescence to individualize/reduce immunosuppression in older recipients is laid out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borefore P Jallah
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk R J Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tiwari A, Mukherjee S. Role of Complement-dependent Cytotoxicity Crossmatch and HLA Typing in Solid Organ Transplant. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2024; 19:34-52. [PMID: 38155466 DOI: 10.2174/0115748871266738231218145616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving medical operation that has progressed greatly because of developments in diagnostic tools and histocompatibility tests. Crossmatching for complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing are two important methods for checking graft compatibility and reducing the risk of graft rejection. HLA typing and CDC crossmatching are critical in kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, intestine, and multi-organ transplantation. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on the internet, using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, to identify peer-reviewed publications about solid organ transplants, HLA typing, and CDC crossmatching. CONCLUSION Recent advances in HLA typing have allowed for high-resolution evaluation, epitope matching, and personalized therapy methods. Genomic profiling, next-generation sequencing, and artificial intelligence have improved HLA typing precision, resulting in better patient outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) driven virtual crossmatching and predictive algorithms have eliminated the requirement for physical crossmatching in the context of CDC crossmatching, boosting organ allocation and transplant efficiency. This review elaborates on the importance of HLA typing and CDC crossmatching in solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpit Tiwari
- Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Sayali Mukherjee
- Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Fijter J, Dreyer G, Mallat M, Budde K, Pratschke J, Klempnauer J, Zeier M, Arns W, Hugo C, Rump LC, Hauser I, Schenker P, Schiffer M, Grimm MO, Kliem V, Olbricht CJ, Pisarski P, Banas B, Suwelack B, Hakenberg O, Berlakovich G, Schneeberger S, van de Wetering J, Berger S, Bemelman F, Kuypers D, Heidt S, Rahmel A, Claas F, Peeters P, Oberbauer R, Heemann U, Krämer BK. A paired-kidney allocation study found superior survival with HLA-DR compatible kidney transplants in the Eurotransplant Senior Program. Kidney Int 2023; 104:552-561. [PMID: 37343659 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) has expedited the chance for elderly patients with kidney failure to receive a timely transplant. This current study evaluated survival parameters of kidneys donated after brain death with or without matching for HLA-DR antigens. This cohort study evaluated the period within ESP with paired allocation of 675 kidneys from donors 65 years and older to transplant candidates 65 years and older, the first kidney to 341 patients within the Eurotransplant Senior DR-compatible Program and 334 contralateral kidneys without (ESP) HLA-DR antigen matching. We used Kaplan-Meier estimates and competing risk analysis to assess all cause mortality and kidney graft failure, respectively. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression were used for comparisons. Within ESP, matching for HLA-DR antigens was associated with a significantly lower five-year risk of mortality (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95) and significantly lower cause-specific hazards for kidney graft failure and return to dialysis at one year (0.55; 0.35-0.87) and five years (0.73; 0.53-0.99) post-transplant. Allocation based on HLA-DR matching resulted in longer cold ischemia (mean difference 1.00 hours; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-1.68) and kidney offers with a significantly shorter median dialysis vintage of 2.4 versus 4.1 yrs. in ESP without matching. Thus, our allocation based on HLA-DR matching improved five-year patient and kidney allograft survival. Hence, our paired allocation study suggests a superior outcome of HLA-DR matching in the context of old-for-old kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
| | - Geertje Dreyer
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marko Mallat
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jürgen Klempnauer
- Integrated Research and Treatment Centre Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Arns
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Hugo
- Clinic for Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lars-Christian Rump
- Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Hauser
- Department of Nephrology, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Peter Schenker
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Mario Schiffer
- Department of Nephrology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Volker Kliem
- Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Center, Nephrological Center of Lower Saxony, Klinikum Hann, Münden, Germany
| | | | - Przemyslaw Pisarski
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Banas
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Suwelack
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Gabriela Berlakovich
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Stefan Berger
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Frederike Bemelman
- Department of Nephrology, Division of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Eurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Axel Rahmel
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Frans Claas
- Eurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Patrick Peeters
- Department of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard K Krämer
- V-th Department of Medicine (Nephrology), University Medical Center Mannheim/University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koch M, Zecher D, Lopau K, Weinmann-Menke J, Schulze A, Nashan B, Wenzel U, Banas B, Zeier M, Thaiss F, Sommerer C. Human Leucocyte Antigen-Matching Can Improve Long Term Outcome of Renal Allografts from Donors Older Than 75 Years. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:309-316. [PMID: 36801175 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal transplantation is the therapy of choice for kidney failure. The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) has been established to allocate kidneys ≥65 years to recipients of the same age group considered a regional allocation with short cold ischemia (CIT) but not human-leukocyte-antigen (HLA)-matching. The acceptance of organs aged ≥75 years is also still controversial within the ESP. METHODS In a multicenter approach, 179 kidney grafts ≥75 years (mean donor age 78 years) that were transplanted in 174 patients in 5 German transplant centers were analyzed. The primary focus of the analysis was long-term outcome of the grafts and the impact of CIT, HLA matching, and recipient related risk factors. RESULTS The mean graft survival was 59 months (median 67 months) with a mean donor age of 78.3 ± 2.9 years. Grafts with 0 to 3 HLA-mismatches had a significantly better overall graft survival compared to grafts with ≥4 mismatches (69 months vs 54 months; P = .008). The mean CIT was short (11.9 ± 5.3 hours) and had no impact on graft survival. CONCLUSION Recipients receiving a kidney graft from donors aged ≥75 years can benefit from nearly 5 years of survival with a functioning graft. Even minimal HLA matching may improve long term allograft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Koch
- General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany; Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
| | - Daniel Zecher
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany
| | - Kai Lopau
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Würzburg, Germany
| | - Julia Weinmann-Menke
- Department of Medicine, Section Nephrology; University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Alicia Schulze
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics; University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Björn Nashan
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Clinic of Hepato-pancreatico-biliary Surgery and The Transplantation Center First Affiliated Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Medical Center University of Sciences & Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Ulrich Wenzel
- Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Banas
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Nephrology Unit, Renal Center Heidelberg, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Friedrich Thaiss
- Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Sommerer
- Nephrology Unit, Renal Center Heidelberg, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seeking Standardized Definitions for HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplants: A Systematic Review. Transplantation 2023; 107:231-253. [PMID: 35915547 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no standard definition for "HLA incompatible" transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes. METHODS We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility. RESULTS Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains. CONCLUSIONS Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
8
|
Impact of Sensitization on Waiting Time Prior to Kidney Transplantation in Germany. Transplantation 2022; 106:2448-2455. [PMID: 35973058 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assignment of unacceptable HLA mismatches (UAMs) prevents transplantation of incompatible grafts but potentially prolongs waiting time. Whether this is true in the Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System (ETKAS) and the Eurotransplant Senior Program in Germany is highly debated and relevant for UAM policies. METHODS Donor pool restriction due to UAM was expressed as percent virtual panel-reactive antibodies (vPRAs). Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze the impact of vPRA levels on waiting time and transplant probability during a period of 2 y in all patients eligible for a kidney graft unter standard circumstances in Germany on February 1, 2019 (n = 6533). Utility of the mismatch probability score to compensate for sensitization in ETKAS was also investigated. RESULTS In ETKAS, donor pool restriction resulted in significant prolongation of waiting time and reduction in transplant probability only in patients with vPRA levels above 85%. This was most evident in patients with vPRA levels above 95%, whereas patients in the acceptable mismatch program had significantly shorter waiting times and higher chances for transplantation than nonsensitized patients. In the Eurotransplant Senior Program, vPRA levels above 50% resulted in significantly longer waiting times and markedly reduced the chance for transplantation. Compensation for sensitization by the mismatch probability score was insufficient. CONCLUSIONS Donor pool restriction had no significant impact on waiting time in most sensitized patients. However, despite the existence of the acceptable mismatch program, the majority of highly sensitized patients is currently disadvantaged and would benefit from better compensation mechanisms.
Collapse
|
9
|
Živčić-Ćosić S, Süsal C, Döhler B, Katalinić N, Markić D, Orlić L, Rački S, Španjol J, Trobonjača Z. Kidney Transplants from Elderly Donors: The Experience of a Reference Center in Croatia. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2022; 20:19-27. [PMID: 35060445 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2021.0366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
10
|
Schachtner T, Otto NM, Reinke P. Two decades of the Eurotransplant Senior Program: the gender gap in mortality impacts patient survival after kidney transplantation. Clin Kidney J 2020; 13:1091-1100. [PMID: 33391754 PMCID: PMC7769544 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfz118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term outcomes of the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) are urgently needed to improve selection criteria and allocation policies in the elderly. METHODS We analysed patient and allograft outcomes of 244 ESP-kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) between 1999 and 2019 and assessed quality of living compared with 82 ESP-waitlisted dialysis patients using standardized short form-8. RESULTS We observed 1-, 5- and 10-year patient survival of 91.7, 66.3 and 38.0%, respectively. Mortality risk factors included male gender (P = 0.006) and T-cell-mediated rejection (P < 0.001). Median patient survival of male ESP-KTRs was 80 versus 131 months for female ESP-KTRs (P = 0.006). 1-, 5- and 10-year death-censored allograft survival was 93.3, 82.6 and 70.4%. Risk factors included high body mass index (P < 0.001) and T-cell-mediated rejection (P < 0.001). After re-initiation of dialysis median patient survival was 58 months. Change of estimated glomerular filtration rate showed a mean decline of 2.3 and 6.8 mL/min at 5 and 10 years. Median physical and mental component scores of ESP-KTRs were 40.2 and 48.3, significantly higher compared with dialysis patients (P < 0.05). Of ESP-KTRs, 97.5% who underwent transplantation would again do so. CONCLUSIONS Long-term outcomes of ESP-KTRs ultimately support the effectiveness of an age-matched allocation system. Our data suggest that the survival advantage of women is maintained after kidney transplantation and calls for gender-specific care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Schachtner
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg Center of Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Natalie M Otto
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg Center of Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Reinke
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg Center of Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Echterdiek F, Latus J, Döhler B, Schwenger V, Süsal C. Impact of HLA compatibility in recipients of kidneys from expanded criteria donors: A Collaborative Transplant Study Report. Int J Immunogenet 2020; 48:201-210. [PMID: 32945128 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Due to a widespread organ shortage, the use of expanded criteria donors (ECDs) in kidney transplantation has increased persistently, reaching approximately 40% in recent years. Whether human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matching between donor and recipient should be part of allocation algorithms in transplantation of ECD kidneys, and especially of ECD kidneys from ≥70-year-old donors, is still in question. To this end, 135,529 kidney transplantations performed between 2000 and 2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analysed and the impact of HLA-A+B+DR mismatches on death-censored graft and patient survival as well as on rejection episodes was investigated. Results were stratified according to donor status (standard criteria donor (SCD) versus ECD) and age of ECD. HLA incompatibility increased the five-year death-censored graft failure risk similarly strong in recipients of ECD and SCD transplants (hazard ratio (HR) per HLA mismatch 1.078 and 1.075, respectively; p < .001 for both). Its impact on rejection treatments during the first post-transplant year was also significant but slightly weaker for recipients of ECD transplants (risk ratio (RR) per HLA mismatch 1.10 for ECD transplants and 1.13 for SCD transplants; p < .001 for both). Mortality increased gradually from zero to six HLA mismatches in recipients of SCD transplants, whereas for ECD transplants a significant increase was notable only from zero to more than zero mismatches. A significant but slightly less pronounced impact of HLA incompatibility on graft failure was observed in transplants from ≥70- compared with <70-year-old ECDs (HR per mismatch 1.047 and 1.093; p = .009 and < 0.001, respectively). The influence of HLA mismatches on rejection treatments was the same for both ECD age groups (RR = 1.10, p < .001 and p = .004, respectively). Our data indicate that HLA matching should be part of allocation algorithms not only in transplantation of kidneys from SCDs but also from ECDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Echterdiek
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Stuttgart - Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Joerg Latus
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Stuttgart - Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Bernd Döhler
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vedat Schwenger
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Stuttgart - Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Renal transplantation in the elderly: Outcomes and recommendations. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2020; 34:100530. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2020.100530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 11/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
13
|
Dreyer GJ, de Fijter JW. Transplanting the Elderly: Mandatory Age- and Minimal Histocompatibility Matching. Front Immunol 2020; 11:359. [PMID: 32226428 PMCID: PMC7080649 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Worldwide over 40% of patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) are aged 65 years or older, a number that is still increasing. Renal transplantation is the preferred RRT, providing substantial survival benefit over those remaining on dialysis, including the elderly. Only 3% of patients aged 65 years or older accepted on the waiting list actually received a kidney transplant offer within the Eurotransplant allocation region. To increase the chance for elderly to receive a timely kidney transplant, the Eurotransplant Senior Program was introduced. The ESP supports local allocation of older kidneys to older donors in order to decrease cold ischemia time, while disregarding former exchange principles based on matching for HLA antigens. As a consequence, more elderly received a kidney transplant and a relative higher incidence of acute rejection resulted in additional courses of high steroids and/or depleting antibody therapy. Since death with a functioning graft due to infections is the dominant reason of graft loss in elderly, more intense clinical immunosuppression to prevent or treat acute rejection is not a very attractive option. Therefore in elderly kidney transplant candidates, we advocate reintroduction of minimal histocompatibility criteria (i.e., HLA-DR matching) followed by age-matching with mandatory local/regional allocation to also facilitate short cold ischemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geertje J Dreyer
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Everolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients participating in the Eurotransplant senior program: Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study (SENATOR). PLoS One 2019; 14:e0222730. [PMID: 31536556 PMCID: PMC6752944 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Early conversion to everolimus was assessed in kidney transplant recipients participating in the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP), a population in whom data are lacking. The SENATOR multicenter study enrolled 207 kidney transplant recipients undergoing steroid withdrawal at week 2 post-transplant (ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00956293]). At week 7, patients were randomized (1:2 ratio) to continue the previous calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimen with mycophenolic acid (MPA) and cyclosporine or switch to a CNI-free regimen with MPA, everolimus (5–10 ng/mL) and basiliximab at weeks 7 and 12, then followed for 18 weeks to month 6 post-transplant. The primary endpoint was estimated GFR (eGFR). At week 7, 77/207 (37.2%) patients were randomized (53 everolimus, 24 control). At month 6, eGFR was comparable: 36.5±10.8ml/min with everolimus versus 42.0±13.0ml/min in the control group (p = 0.784). Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 27.8% of everolimus-treated patients and 0.0% of control patients (p = 0005). Efficacy profiles showed no difference. In conclusion, eGFR, safety and efficacy outcomes at month 6 post-transplant showed no difference between groups. The everolimus group experienced a higher rate of discontinuation due to adverse events. However, the high rate of non-randomization is highly relevant, indicating this to be a somewhat unstable patient population regardless of treatment.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lehner LJ, Kleinsteuber A, Halleck F, Khadzhynov D, Schrezenmeier E, Duerr M, Eckardt KU, Budde K, Staeck O. Assessment of the Kidney Donor Profile Index in a European cohort. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2019; 33:1465-1472. [PMID: 29617898 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recently, transplant societies have had to change their allocation policies to counter global organ shortages. However, strategies differ significantly and long-term outcomes and cross-regional applicability remain to be evaluated. Methods Therefore, we retrospectively analysed the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of 987 adult kidney transplants at our centre using data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) as a reference. Results In our cohort, the median KDPI was 66%, with a higher proportion of >85% KDPI kidneys compared with the US cohort (32.3% versus 9.2%). Among elderly patients (≥65 years of age), 62% received >95% KDPI kidneys, which were primarily allocated within the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP). After 10 years, the rate of death-censored graft survival was 70.5%. Recipients of >85% KDPI kidneys were significantly older, demonstrating higher mortality, poorer graft survival and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients receiving ≥99% KDPI kidneys had a satisfactory 5-year death-censored graft survival (72.9%). The 5-year survival rate of patients living with a functioning graft exceeded the matched OPTN data in the whole KDPI range, despite a higher proportion of elderly recipients. Multivariate analysis revealed KDPI as an independent risk factor for graft loss (hazard ratio 1.14/10%, P < 0.001), although C-statistics of 0.62 indicated limited discriminative ability for individuals. Conclusion The analysis demonstrated KDPI as a potentially useful tool for donor quality assessment in a European cohort. Most importantly, our analysis revealed acceptable outcomes even for very high KDPI kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Johannes Lehner
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Kleinsteuber
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Halleck
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dmytro Khadzhynov
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Schrezenmeier
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Duerr
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kai-Uwe Eckardt
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Staeck
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sureshkumar KK, Chopra B. Induction Type and Outcomes in HLA-DR Mismatch Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:1796-1800. [PMID: 31399165 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In kidney transplantation, donor recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR mismatch signals high immunologic risk and portends inferior outcomes. We compared the impacts of depleting vs non-depleting antibody induction on the outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) at different levels of HLA-DR mismatches. METHODS Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified adult KTRs from 2001 to 2015 who received induction therapy with either depleting (thymoglobulin/alemtuzumab) or non-depleting (basiliximab/daclizumab) antibody and were discharged on calcineurin inhibitor/mycophenolic acid maintenance. Patients were then stratified by the number of donor-recipient HLA-DR mismatches (0, 1, 2) in both living donor (LD) and deceased donor (DD) KTRs. Under each HLA-DR mismatch category, long-term outcomes were compared for depleting vs non-depleting induction using a Cox model. RESULTS A total of 63,821 LD (HLA-DR mismatches: 0, n = 6945 [depleting = 4409, non-depleting = 2536]; 1, n = 19,557 [depleting = 13,558, non-depleting = 6019]; and 2, n = 10,727 [depleting = 7694, non-depleting = 3033]) and 64,922 DD (HLA-DR mismatches: 0, n = 13,915 [depleting = 10,124, non-depleting = 3791]; 1, n = 27,994 [depleting = 20,454, non-depleting = 7540]; and 2, n = 23,013 [depleting = 16,908, non-depleting = 6105]) KTRs were included in the analysis. Adjusted patient death risk was significantly lower in the depleting vs non-depleting antibody induction group among DD kidney recipients (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96, P = .001) and trended lower among LD kidney recipients (HR 0.88, 95% 0.79-1.01, P = .05) with 2 HLA-DR mismatches. DISCUSSION Our study found a patient survival benefit associated with the use of perioperative induction with depleting when compared to non-depleting antibody in KTRs with 2 HLA-DR mismatches and maintained on a calcineurin inhibitor/mycophenolic acid regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalathil K Sureshkumar
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medicine Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA.
| | - Bhavna Chopra
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medicine Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
von Moos S, Schalk G, Mueller TF, Laube G. Age-associated decrease in de novo donor-specific antibodies in renal transplant recipients reflects changing humoral immunity. IMMUNITY & AGEING 2019; 16:9. [PMID: 31168309 PMCID: PMC6509825 DOI: 10.1186/s12979-019-0149-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background Older age at organ transplantation is associated with increased risk of infection and malignancy but reduced risk of cellular rejection. De novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (dnDSA), are key biomarkers associated with reduced long-term allograft survival, yet there is a lack of data focusing on age-associated changes. Methods Development of dnDSA was restrospectively analyzed in all subjects who received a kidney transplant at the University Hospital Zurich between 01/2006 and 02/2015. Follow up continued until 03/2016. The incidence of dnDSA in different age categories was compared with special focus on the extremes of age: children < 10 years (n = 19) and adults ≥60 years of age (n = 110). Results Incidence of dnDSA gradually decreased with age, with older recipients having a significantly lower risk (HR 0.21, p = 0.0224) compared to pediatric recipients. Cumulative incidence of dnDSA at 2, 5 and 10 years was 6.2, 9.1 and 36% in the older recipients versus 5.3, 29.5 and 47.1% in pediatric recipients. Median time to development of dnDSA was similar (older 720 days, min 356, max 3646 days; children 1086 days, min 42, max 2474 days). Annual incidence was highest within the first two years after transplantation in the older recipients and peaked in years two to four in pediatric recipients. DnDSA were predominantly class II. More dnDSA were observed with cyclosporine as compared to tacrolimus. Conclusion Older kidney transplant recipients have a lower risk of developing dnDSA than pediatric recipients, pointing towards reduced humoral immune reactivity with increasing age. This observation raises the question of adjustment in immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seraina von Moos
- 1Department of Nephrology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Gesa Schalk
- 2Department of Nephrology, University of Zurich and University Children's Hospital, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas F Mueller
- 1Department of Nephrology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Guido Laube
- 2Department of Nephrology, University of Zurich and University Children's Hospital, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cossart AR, Cottrell WN, Campbell SB, Isbel NM, Staatz CE. Characterizing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressant medicines and patient outcomes in elderly renal transplant patients. Transl Androl Urol 2019; 8:S198-S213. [PMID: 31236338 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.10.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This review examines what is currently known about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of commonly prescribed immunosuppressant medicines, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolate and prednisolone, in elderly renal transplant recipients, and reported patient outcomes in this cohort. Renal transplantation is increasing rapidly in the elderly, however, currently, long-term patient outcomes are relatively poor compared to younger adults. Some studies have suggested that elderly recipients may have higher dose-adjusted exposure and/or lower clearance of the calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and cyclosporine; with one study reporting up to 50% reduction in tacrolimus exposure in the elderly. Elderly transplant recipients do not appear to have higher dosage-adjusted exposure to mycophenolic acid (MPA). The effects of ageing on the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone are unknown. Only one study has examined how aging effects drug target enzymes, reporting no difference in baseline inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity and MPA-induced IMPDH activity in elderly compared to younger adult renal transplant recipients. In elderly transplant recipients, immunosenescence likely lowers the risk of acute rejection, but increases the risk of drug-related adverse effects. Currently, the three main causes of death in elderly renal transplant recipients are cardiovascular disease, infection and malignancy. One study has showed that renal transplant recipients aged over 65 years are seven times more likely to die with a functioning graft compared with young adults (aged 18-29 years). This suggests that an optimal balance between immunosuppressant medicine efficacy and toxicity is not achieved in elderly recipients, and further studies are needed to foster long-term graft and patient survival. Lower maintenance immunosuppressant targets in elderly recipients may decrease patient susceptibility to drug side effects, however, further studies are required and appropriate targets need to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia R Cossart
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - W Neil Cottrell
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Scott B Campbell
- Department of Nephrology, University of Queensland at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Nicole M Isbel
- Department of Nephrology, University of Queensland at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sommerer C, Suwelack B, Dragun D, Schenker P, Hauser IA, Witzke O, Hugo C, Kamar N, Merville P, Junge M, Thaiss F, Nashan B. An open-label, randomized trial indicates that everolimus with tacrolimus or cyclosporine is comparable to standard immunosuppression in de novo kidney transplant patients. Kidney Int 2019; 96:231-244. [PMID: 31027892 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
This is a randomized trial (ATHENA study) in de novo kidney transplant patients to compare everolimus versus mycophenolic acid (MPA) with similar tacrolimus exposure in both groups, or everolimus with concomitant tacrolimus or cyclosporine (CsA), in an unselected population. In this 12-month, multicenter, open-label study, de novo kidney transplant recipients were randomized to everolimus with tacrolimus (EVR/TAC), everolimus with CsA (EVR/CsA) or MPA with tacrolimus (MPA/TAC), with similar tacrolimus exposure in both groups. Non-inferiority of the primary end point (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] at month 12), assessed in the per-protocol population of 338 patients, was not shown for EVR/TAC or EVR/CsA versus MPA/TAC. In 123 patients with TAC levels within the protocol-specified range, eGFR outcomes were comparable between groups. The mean increase in eGFR during months 1 to 12 post-transplant, analyzed post hoc, was similar with EVR/TAC or EVR/CsA versus MPA/TAC. The incidence of treatment failure (biopsy proven acute rejection, graft loss or death) was not significant for EVR/TAC but significant for EVR/CsA versus MPA/TAC. Most biopsy-proven acute rejection events in this study were graded mild (BANFF IA). There were no differences in proteinuria between groups. Cytomegalovirus and BK virus infection were significantly more frequent with MPA/TAC. Thus, everolimus with TAC or CsA showed comparable efficacy to MPA/TAC in de novo kidney transplant patients. Non-inferiority of renal function, when pre-specified, was not shown, but the mean increase in eGFR from month 1 to 12 was comparable to MPA/TAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Sommerer
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Barbara Suwelack
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Transplant Nephrology, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Duska Dragun
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universtätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Schenker
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Ingeborg A Hauser
- Department of Nephrology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Oliver Witzke
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Nephrology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Hugo
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, INSERM U1043, IFR-BMT, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Merville
- Department of Nephrology-Transplantation-Dialysis-Apheresis, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Friedrich Thaiss
- III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Björn Nashan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rodríguez Faba O, Boissier R, Budde K, Figueiredo A, Taylor CF, Hevia V, Lledó García E, Regele H, Zakri RH, Olsburgh J, Breda A. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Transplantation: Update 2018. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4:208-215. [PMID: 30033070 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2018] [Revised: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) panel on renal transplantation (RT) has released an updated version of the RT guidelines. OBJECTIVE To present the 2018 EAU guidelines on RT. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise was performed, encompassing all areas of RT guidelines published between January 1, 2007, and May 31, 2016. Databases covered by the search included Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Libraries. Previous guidelines were updated, and levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were assigned. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS It is strongly recommended to offer pure or hand-assisted laparoscopic/retroperitoneoscopic surgery as the preferential technique for living donor nephrectomy. Decisions on the acceptance of a donor organ should not be based on histological findings alone since this might lead to an unnecessarily high rate of discarded grafts. For ureterovesical anastomosis, a Lich-Gregoir-like extravesical technique protected by a ureteral stent is the preferred technique for minimisation of urinary tract complications. It is also strongly recommended to perform initial rejection prophylaxis with a combination therapy comprising a calcineurin inhibitor (preferably tacrolimus), mycophenolate, steroids, and an induction agent (either basiliximab or anti-thymocyte globulin). The long version of the guidelines is available at the EAU website (http://uroweb.org/guidelines). CONCLUSIONS These abridged EAU guidelines present updated information on the clinical and surgical management of RT for incorporation into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY The European Association of Urology has released the renal transplantation guidelines. The implementation of minimally invasive surgery for organ retrieval and the latest evidence on transplant surgery as well as on immunosuppressive regimens are key factors for minimisation of rejection and achievement of long-term graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Rodríguez Faba
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Romain Boissier
- Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation, La Conception University Hospital, Assistance-Publique Marseille, France
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arnaldo Figueiredo
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Claire Fraser Taylor
- Department of Urology and Transplant, St Georges NHS Trust Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Vital Hevia
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Alcalá University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Lledó García
- Department of Urology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Heinz Regele
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rhana Hassan Zakri
- Department of Urology and Transplant, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Jonathon Olsburgh
- Department of Urology and Transplant, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lachmann N, Niemann M, Reinke P, Budde K, Schmidt D, Halleck F, Pruß A, Schönemann C, Spierings E, Staeck O. Donor-Recipient Matching Based on Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes Independently Predicts the Incidence of De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies Following Renal Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:3076-3086. [PMID: 28613392 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2016] [Revised: 05/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (dnDSA) are recognized as a risk factor for premature allograft failure. Determinants of DSA specificity are generated via the indirect allorecognition pathway. Here, we present supportive data for the relevance of predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes (PIRCHE) to predict dnDSA following kidney transplantation. A total of 2787 consecutive kidney transplants performed between 1995 and 2015 without preformed DSA have been analyzed. De novo DSA were detected by single antigen bead assay. HLA epitope mismatches were determined by the HLAMatchmaker and PIRCHE approach and correlated in uni- and multivariate analyses with 10-year allograft survival and incidence of dnDSA. The PIRCHE-II score moderately predicted allograft survival. However, the predictive value of elevated PIRCHE-II scores >9 for the incidence of dnDSA was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for antigen mismatch and HLAMatchmaker epitopes, the PIRCHE-II score could be identified as an independent risk factor for dnDSA. The PIRCHE-II score independently from the antigen mismatch and HLAMatchmaker epitopes could be revealed as being a strong predictor for dnDSA. PIRCHE may help to identify acceptable mismatches with decreased risk of dnDSA and thus improve long-term renal allograft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Lachmann
- Center for Tumor Medicine, H&I Laboratory, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - P Reinke
- Department of Nephrology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - K Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - D Schmidt
- Department of Nephrology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - F Halleck
- Department of Nephrology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Pruß
- Universitary Tissue Bank, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Schönemann
- Center for Tumor Medicine, H&I Laboratory, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - E Spierings
- UMC Utrecht, Laboratory of Translational Immunology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - O Staeck
- Department of Nephrology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|