Effects of recurrent urinary tract infections on graft and patient outcomes after kidney transplantation

Diagnosing and Managing Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients

In the article, the authors review antibiotic treatment options for both acute uncomplicated UTI and complicated UTI. In addition, they review alternative regimens which are needed in the setting of drug-resistant pathogens including vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, -extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas, which are encountered with more frequency.

The phenomenon of urinary tract infection experienced by women with a kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infection is the most common infection among people with a kidney transplant and increases the risk of graft rejection. Women have a higher risk. A literature search did not identify any description of the phenomenon of urinary tract infection experienced by women with a kidney transplant.

OBJECTIVE

To examine how women with a kidney transplant experienced the phenomenon of a urinary tract infection.

DESIGN

A qualitative study with a phenomenological approach.

APPROACH

Eight individual semistructured interviews based on van Manen's four lifeworld existentials and analysed using systematic text condensation.

PARTICIPANTS

Women with a kidney transplant and recently been admitted to the hospital due to a urinary tract infection.

FINDINGS

We identified four themes: (1) Feeling both typical and atypical symptoms; (2) Becoming aware of the body and trying her best to prevent urinary tract infection; (3) Having a urinary tract infection is a dual experience, both good and bad; (4) Support from relatives.

CONCLUSION

The urinary tract infection symptoms pathway varied between participants but also between individual episodes of incidents among each participant. Participants felt secure when they experienced a common symptom pattern, but a new symptom pattern made them insecure. Together with their relatives, they experienced a urinary tract infection as a disruption of their everyday life and it decreased their experiences of happiness. They experienced to be supported by relatives but also by healthcare professionals, but needed more information on how to prevent, observe and react to a urinary tract infection in the future.

Predicting kidney allograft survival with explainable machine learning

INTRODUCTION

Despite significant progress over the last decades in the survival of kidney allografts, several risk factors remain contributing to worsening kidney function or even loss of transplants. We aimed to evaluate a new machine learning method to identify these variables which may predict the early graft loss in kidney transplant patients and to assess their usefulness for improving clinical decisions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out with 627 kidney transplant patients followed at least three months. All these data were pre-processed, and their selected features were used to develop an automatically working a machine learning algorithm; this algorithm was then applied for training and parameterization of the model; and finally, the tested model was then used for the analysis of patients' features that were the most impactful for the prediction of clinical outcomes. Our models were evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm was used to interpret its predictions.

RESULTS

The final selected model achieved a precision of 0.81, a sensitivity of 0.61, a specificity of 0.89, and an AUC value of 0.84. In our model, serum creatinine levels of kidney transplant patients, evaluated at the hospital discharge, proved to be the most important factor in the decision-making for the allograft loss. Patients with a weight equivalent to a BMI closer to the normal range prior to a kidney transplant are less likely to experience graft loss compared to patients with a BMI below the normal range. The age of patients at transplantation and Polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection had significant impact on clinical outcomes in our model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our algorithm suggests that the main characteristics that impacted early allograft loss were serum creatinine levels at the hospital discharge, as well as the pre-transplant values such as body weight, age of patients, and their BKPyV infection. We propose that machine learning tools can be developed to effectively assist medical decision-making in kidney transplantation.

Different profiles of acute graft pyelonephritis among kidney recipients from standard or elderly donors

Background

Acute graft pyelonephritis (AGPN) is a relatively common complication in kidney transplants (KTs); however, the effects on allograft function, diagnostic criteria, and risk factors are not well established.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of all consecutive adult KTs was performed between 01 January 2011 and 31 December 2018 (follow-up ended on 31 December 2019) to examine the association between the diagnosis of AGPN (confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) during the first post-transplantation year and graft outcomes.

Results

Among the 939 consecutive KTs (≈50% with donors ≥60 years), we identified 130 MRI-confirmed AGPN episodes, with a documented association with recurrent and multidrug-resistant bacterial urinary tract infections (UTIs) (p < 0.005). Ureteral stenosis was the only risk factor associated with AGPN (OR 2.9 [95% CI, 1.6 to 5.2]). KTs with AGPN had a decreased allograft function at the first year (ΔeGFR 6 mL/min/1.73 m2 [-2-15] in non-AGPN vs. -0.2 [-6.5-8.5] in AGPN, p < 0.001), with similar and negative profiles in KTs from standard or elderly donors. However, only KTs with AGPN and a donor <60 years showed reduced death-censored graft survival (p = 0.015); most of this subgroup received anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction (40.4% vs. 17.7%), and their MRI presented either a multifocal AGPN pattern (73.9% vs. 56.7%) or abscedation (28.3% vs. 11.7%). No difference was noted in death-censored graft survival between early (<3 months post-KT) or late (3-12 months) AGPN, solitary/recurrent forms, or types of multidrug-resistant pathogens. Linear regression confirmed the independent role of multifocal pattern, abscedation, ATG induction, and donor age on the eGFR at the first year.

Conclusion

AGPN, influenced by multifocal presentation, ATG induction, donor age, and abscedation, affects kidney function and significantly impacts allograft survival in KTs with donors <60 years.

Randomized clinical trial of non-antibiotic prophylaxis with d-Mannose plus Proanthocyanidins vs. Proanthocyanidins alone for urinary tract infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria in de novo kidney transplant recipients: The Manotras study

BACKGROUND

Studies analyzing non-antibiotic alternatives in kidney transplant UTI's are lacking. d-Mannose, a simple sugar, inhibits bacterial attachment to the urothelium, as does Proanthocyanidins; both could act as a synergic strategy preventing UTI; nonetheless their efficacy and safety have not been evaluated in kidney transplant population yet.

METHODS

This is a pilot prospective, double-blind randomized trial. Sixty de novo kidney transplant recipients were randomized (1:1) to receive a prophylactic strategy based on a 24-h prolonged release formulation of d-Mannose plus Proanthocyanidins vs. Proanthocyanidins (PAC) alone. The supplements were taken for the first 3 months after kidney transplant and then followed up for 3 months as well. The main objective of the study was to search if the addition of Mannose to PAC alone reduced the incidence of UTI and/or asymptomatic bacteriuria in the first 6 months post-transplantation.

RESULTS

27% of patients experienced one UTI episode (cystitis or pyelonephritis) while asymptomatic bacteriuria was very common (57%). Incidences according UTI type or AB were: 7% vs. 4% for cystitis episode (p 0.3), 4% vs. 5% for pyelonephritis (p 0.5) and 17% vs. 14% for asymptomatic bacteriuria (p 0.4) for patients in the Mannose+PAC group vs. PAC group respectively. The most frequent bacteria isolated in both groups was Escherichia coli (28% of all episodes), UTI or AB due to E. coli was not different according to study group (30% vs. 23% for Mannose+PAC vs. PAC alone p 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-antibiotic therapy is an unmet need to prevent UTI after kidney transplantation; however, the use of d-Mannose plus PAC does not seem capable to prevent it.

Outcomes of Bladder Washout for the Treatment of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections After Renal Transplantation

Background Current literature suggests that anywhere from 2.9-27% of renal transplant recipients (RTR) will develop recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) (≥2 UTIs over six months or ≥3 UTIs over 12 months). Recurrent UTIs are of particular importance to RTR given its increased risk for allograft fibrosis and overall patient survival. Alternative solutions are needed for the management of recurrent UTIs, especially given the vulnerability of RTR to UTIs. We hypothesize that bladder washout (BW) reduces the incidence and recurrence of UTIs in RTR. Methods This is a retrospective study evaluating the utility of BW procedures on RTR diagnosed with recurrent UTIs between December 2013 and July 2021 at a single center. Results A total of 106 patients were included in the study with a total of 118 BW performed. 69% of patients were successfully treated with BW, meaning they no longer met the criteria for recurrent UTIs (<1 UTI) in the six-month post-BW period. The mean number of UTIs was 2.76 (range 2-7) before the BW and 1.16 (range 0-5) after the BW. On average, there were 1.60 fewer UTIs in the post-BW period compared to the pre-BW period (p<0.0001). There is no statistically significant difference in success rates stratified by bacterial class (p=1) or antimicrobial resistance class (p=0.6937). Conclusion BW decreased the incidence of UTIs in the six-month post-operative period as nearly 70% of patients did not have UTI recurrence. This data provides evidence that BW may have utility in transplant recipients with recurrent UTIs. We hope this will stimulate further prospective randomized studies in this area.

Outcomes of asymptomatic histologic pyelonephritis of kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Urinary Tract Infections are the most common post-transplant infection and can have varied presentations. This study aimed to describe the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with asymptomatic histologic pyelonephritis on allograft biopsy. Histologic Pyelonephritis was defined as neutrophil cast or neutrophilic tubulitis, interstitial infiltrates with predominant neutrophils, and no evidence of rejection or glomerulonephritis on biopsy.

METHODS

The study included 123 kidney transplant recipients, of whom 95 underwent protocol biopsies, and 28 had biopsies for elevated creatinine within the first 2 years of a kidney transplant.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 55.3 years, with 52% females and 78% deceased donor transplants. The risk factors for asymptomatic histologic pyelonephritis were recipient female sex (OR 1.89, 1.3-2.7, diabetes mellitus (OR 2.479, 1.687-3.645), and deceased donation (OR 1.69, 1.098-2.63). The incidence of asymptomatic pyelonephritis on protocol biopsy was 1.7%, with 52% having positive urine cultures and Escherichia coli being the most common bacteria. Subjects with asymptomatic pyelonephritis had inferior graft survival compared to the matched cohort HR 1.88 (1.06-3.35), p = .0281. In addition, of these 123 subjects, 68 (55%) subsequently developed pyelonephritis, and 34 subjects had pyelonephritis within 6 months after this episode. Subjects with recurrent infections exhibited lower survival HR 2.86 (1.36-6.02) and a trend toward higher rejection risk.

CONCLUSION

Asymptomatic histologic pyelonephritis can occur in kidney transplant recipients and is associated with inferior graft survival.

Prevalence and risk factors of urinary tract infection in kidney recipients: a meta-analysis study

BACKGROUND

A kidney recipient's urinary tract infection (UTI) can result in infectious problems and be a risk factor for less successful transplant outcomes. UTI risk factors are still controversial. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of UTI and its association with risk factors in kidney recipients.

METHOD

Twenty-six papers published between 2005 and 2022 were retrieved using keywords and searching Medlib, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and other databases. If possible, the pooled prevalence of UTI in kidney recipients and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval for each risk factor were calculated. The data were analyzed using the random effects model in R and Stata 14.

RESULTS

The total sample size was 72,600, with an average age of 48.7 years. The pooled prevalence of UTI was 35% (95% CI, 30-40%). The estimated risk factors for UTI were female (OR = 3.13; 95%CI: 2.35-4.17), older age (OR = 1.03; 95%CI: 1-1.05), history of UTI (OR = 1.31; 95%CI) CI: 1.05-1.63), receiving a kidney from a deceased donor (OR = 1.59; 95%CI: 1.23-2.35), long-term use of an indwelling catheter (OR = 3.03; 95%CI: 1.59-6.59), a ureteral stent (OR = 1.54; 95%CI: 1.16-2.06), diabetes (OR = 1.17; 95%CI: 0.97-1.41), hypertension (OR = 1.6; 95%CI: 1.26-2.28), acute rejection process (OR = 2.22; 95%CI: 1.45-3.4), and abnormal urinary tract anatomy (OR = 2.87; 95%CI 1.44-5.74).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis revealed that UTIs are a significant problem in kidney recipients. Factors such as female sex, old age, history of UTIs, deceased donor, long-term use of an indwelling catheter, diabetes, acute rejection process, use of ureteral stent, abnormal urinary tract anatomy, and hypertension were related to an increased risk of UTIs in kidney recipients.

Risk Factors and Outcome of Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection in Living-Donor Renal Transplant Recipients: A Case-Control Study From Pakistan

OBJECTIVES

Gram-negative rods are the most common cause of bloodstream infection in renal transplant recipients. Acute rejection, urologic abnormalities, and ureteral stents are risk factors. Graft dysfunction is independently associated with gram-negative rod bloodstream infection. Our aim is to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcome among living donor renal transplant recipients from Pakistan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this case-control study, we reviewed the medical records until June 2021 of renal transplant recipients seen from 2015 to 2019 for gram negative bacteremia. For every case, controls were matched by age, date of transplant, and sex. Demographics, risk factors, graft function, and mortality were compared. Clinical features, immunosuppression, source of blood stream infection, and microbiology were noted in cases.

RESULTS

Of 1677 renal transplant recipients, 44 developed gram negative bacteremia. The incidence was 5.9 per 1000 person-years. Median time since transplant was 5 months. The most common source was urinary tract infection. On univariate analysis, antithymocyte globulin, urinary tract infection, and recurrent urinary tract infections were associated with gram negative bacteremia. On multivariate analysis, urinary tract infection (adjusted odds ratio = 3.46; 95% CI, 1.27-9.37) and recurrent urinary tract infections (adjusted odds ratio = 4.03; 95% CI, 1.15-14.15) were significant risk factors. We found no difference in 30-day mortality and estimated glomerular filtration rate on last follow-up between cases and controls. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed significant differences in graft survival in patients with gram negative bacteremia. Escherichia coli was the most common organism, with 75% ceftriaxone and 13% imipenem resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The most significant risk factor for gram negative rod bloodstream infection was recurrent urinary tract infections. Timely treatment and prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections areimperative for prevention of gram negative bacteremia.

Urinary Tract Infection 1 Year After Kidney Transplant: Effect on Kidney Transplant Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Transplant is the gold standard treatment for end-stage renal disease, and yet infectious complications frequently arise in kidney recipients in the context of immunosuppression therapy, with urinary tract infection being the most common. We aimed to assess the prevalence of posttransplant urinary tract infections in kidney transplant recipients and assess the effects on kidney allograft and overall patient outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from State University of New York Upstate University Hospital from January 2016 to November 2022 to assess transplant outcomes in patients who underwent a kidney transplant at our center and met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

There were 507 renal allograft recipients who met our inclusion criteria and were assessed for the incidence of urinary tract infection within the first year after transplant. Urinary tract infection was recurrent in 113 transplant recipients (55.6%) within the first year, and 118 (58.1%) were on prophylactic antibiotics at urinary tract infection diagnosis. We observed no relation between recurrence of urinary tract infection and use of prophylactic antibiotics (P = .21). Overall allograft survival rate was 92.1% in the urinary tract infection group and 96.7% in the group without urinary tract infection, which was significantly different (P = .02). Urinary tract infection significantly affected allograft survival (hazard ratio, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.49-8.23; P = .004). Overall patient survival rates were 86.7% and 91.4% in the groups with and without urinary tract infection, respectively (P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

We determined that allograft survival was significantly greater in the group without urinary tract infection versus the urinary tract infection group. We found no relation between urinary tract infection recurrence and prophylactic antibiotics. We also found that overall patient survival was not significantly different in the group with urinary tract infection versus the group without urinary tract infection.

Differences in the composition of the bacterial element of the urinary tract microbiome in patients undergoing dialysis and patients after kidney transplantation

Introduction

The development of molecular biology methods and their application in microbial research allowed the detection of many new pathogens that cause urinary tract infections (UTIs). Despite the advances of using new research techniques, the etiopathogenesis of UTIs, especially in patients undergoing dialysis and patients after kidney transplantation, is still not fully understood.

Methods

This study aimed to characterize and compare the composition of the bacterial element of the urinary tract microbiome between the groups of patients undergoing dialysis (n = 50) and patients after kidney transplantation (n = 50), with positive or negative urine culture, compared to healthy individuals (n = 50).

Results

Asymptomatic bacteriuria was observed in 30% of the urine cultures of patients undergoing dialysis and patients after kidney transplantation, with Escherichia coli as the most dominant microorganism (73%) detected with the use of classical microbiology techniques. However, differences in the bacterial composition of the urine samples between the evaluated patient groups were demonstrated using the amplicon sequencing. Finegoldia, Leptotrichia, and Corynebacterium were found to be discriminative bacteria genera in patients after dialysis and kidney transplantation compared to the control group. In addition, in all of urine samples, including those without bacteriuria in classical urine culture, many types of bacteria have been identified using 16S rRNA sequencing.

Discussion

The revealed microbial characteristics may form the basis in searching for new diagnostic markers in treatment of patients undergoing dialysis and patients after kidney transplantation.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients

Background

Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) are common after renal transplantation (RTx), and the impact on graft and patient survival remains controversial.

Objective

In this study, we investigate the incidence and risk factors for rUTIs in a cohort of RTx recipients and evaluate the effect on graft and patient survival.

Design setting and participants

A retrospective cohort of adult patients who underwent RTx at Rigshospitalet, Denmark, between 2014 and 2021 was evaluated in this study.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Risk factors for rUTIs were explored with a multivariable cause-specific Cox proportional hazard analysis. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to assess overall survival.

Results and limitations

A total of 571 RTx recipients were included. The median age was 52 yr (interquartile range: 42-62 yr). Of the cases, 62% were deceased donor RTx. A total of 103 recipients experienced rUTIs. We found increasing age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02 per year increase, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.00-1.04, p = 0.02), female gender (HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4-3.3, p < 0.001), history of lower urinary tract symptoms (HR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.4-3.5, p = 0.001), and a UTI within 30 d of surgery (HR: 3.5, 95% CI: 2.1-5.9, p < 0.001) were associated with rUTIs. No influence of rUTIs on overall or graft survival was observed.

Conclusions

One in six patients experience rUTIs after RTx. Pre- and postoperative variables affect the risk of rUTIs, but none are easily modifiable. In this cohort, rUTIs did not affect the graft function or survival. The etiology of rUTIs remains poorly understood, and there is a continuous need to study how rUTIs can be reduced and treated optimally.

Patient summary

In this study, we looked at the risk factors for recurrent urinary tract infections in patients after kidney transplantation. We conclude that 21.5% of patients experience recurrent urinary tract infections 5 years after kidney transplantation. Multiple risk factors were found and should be taken into consideration by clinicians.

Bacterial Urinary Tract Infection and Early Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Kidney Transplantation Still Negatively Affect Kidney Transplant Outcomes in the Era of Modern Immunosuppression and Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis

Risk factors and consequences of urinary tract infection (UTI) post-kidney transplant have been variously reported by studies that were heterogenous in immunosuppressants and prophylactic protocols. We aimed to clarify the risks and consequences of UTI in kidney transplant recipients with post-transplantation cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in the context of modern immunosuppression. This retrospective cohort included kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate, prednisolone, and cotrimoxazole for bacterial UTI prophylaxis. Recipients were categorized into non-UTI and UTI groups. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) was screened in the first 3 months and was evaluated for association with UTI. Of 348 kidney transplant recipients, 129 were in the UTI group and 219 in the non-UTI group. UTI risk factors were female sex, body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m², human leukocyte antigen mismatch, and panel reactive antibody ≥ 50%. Recipients with recurrent UTI had inferior allograft function compared with non-UTI recipients. Patient survival was significantly lower in recipients with UTI in the first post-transplant month. Higher degree of immunosuppressions was associated with recurrent UTI and drug-resistant organisms. In conclusion, UTI continues to negatively affect graft function and survival of kidney transplant recipients. Treating ASB in the first 3 months did not reduce the UTI incidence in the first transplantation year.

Influence of Graft Ureter Length, a Donor-Related Factor, on Urinary Tract Infections After Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Analysis of 211 Cases

Urinary tract infection (UTI) occurs in 25% of recipients of living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Female sex, age, and anatomical abnormalities have been reported as recipient-related risk factors for UTI after LDKT; few studies have reported donor-related factors. We retrospectively examined UTI occurrence within 5 years of transplantation in recipients (n = 211) who underwent LDKT at our hospital between April 2011 and April 2021. All nephrectomies were performed using a retroperitoneal pure laparoscopic approach. The ureter was dissected at the lower level of the common iliac artery and trimmed to the shortest length, enough to reach the bladder using extra vesicular ureterocystoneostomy with a 3 cm submucosal tunnel. Twenty-nine recipients (13.7%) developed UTI within 5 years, and the median time to onset was 40.0 days. After adjusting for the well-known factors, including recipient sex, graft ureter length was an independent factor for UTI occurrence (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02∼1.53, p = 0.028) in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. The long ureter is usually trimmed, and the widest part is used for anastomosis, which may increase the possibility of reflux from the bladder to the ureter in the standard technique. The ureter length may be associated with the incidence of UTI after LDKT.

Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients: Risk Factors and Outcomes in Low-resource Settings

Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) after kidney transplantation are a common problem adversely affecting graft outcomes. This retrospective study aimed to report the frequency and risk factors of recurrent UTI and their impact on graft and patient outcomes in kidney transplant recipients at the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan, in January-December 2015. Five-year graft and patient survival rates were compared among different groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Of the 251 recipients, 67 developed one episode of UTI. Of these 67, 29 had 76 episodes of recurrent UTI. Out of the 76 episodes of recurrent UTI, Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen in 32 cases. Organisms causing recurrent UTI showed resistance to carbapenem in 19 cases versus 2 in the non-recurrent UTI group (P = 0.006). The estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year was 57.8 ± 16.23 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the recurrent UTI group vs. 61.9 ± 15.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the non-recurrent UTI group (P = 0.001). Graft survival in the recurrent UTI group at 5 years was significantly lower (76%) than in the non-recurrent UTI (95%) and no UTI groups (93%) (log-rank P = 0.006), with no significant effect on patient survival in these groups (P = 0.429). The presence of double-J stent (P = 0.036) and cytomegalovirus infections (P = 0.013) independently predicted recurrent UTI. Recurrent UTIs are common in low-resource settings and adversely affect graft outcomes. Appropriate prophylaxis and treatment are important to reduce recurrent UTI to improve graft outcomes.

Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent urinary tract infection in kidney transplant recipients

Background

Rapid and accurate pathogen diagnosis is an urgent unmet clinical need for recurrent urinary tract infection (RUTI) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) may offer another strategy for diagnosing uropathogens but remains to be studied.

Methods

Nineteen KTRs with RUTI were collected in this study. The uropathogens were detected and compared by mNGS and urine culture, respectively. Modifications of the anti-infection strategy were also assessed.

Results

Rich and diverse pathogens were revealed by mNGS. mNGS was significantly higher than culture in total positive rate (100.0% vs. 31.6%; p < 0.01) and in identification rates for bacteria (89.5% vs. 31.6%; p < 0.01), for viruses (57.9% vs. 0; p < 0.01), and for fungi (42.1% vs. 0; p < 0.01), respectively. mNGS identified a significantly higher proportion of mixed infections than culture (89.5% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.01). The anti-infection therapies were adjusted in two (33.3%) and 12 (76.9%) cases guided by culture and mNGS, respectively.

Conclusion

mNGS has more remarkable etiological diagnostic performance compared with urine culture for KTRs with RUTI to guide anti-infection strategies and, in turn, protect the graft.

The adverse effects of high-dose corticosteroid on infectious and non-infectious sequelae in renal transplant recipients with coronavirus disease-19 in India

INTRODUCTION

The corticosteroid dosing modulation in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is not well defined. We aimed to analyze the outcomes and infectious and non-infectious sequelae in RTR with COVID-19 with reference to corticosteroid dosing and the first and second pandemic waves of COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included RTRs admitted during two pandemic waves between March 25, 2020, and July 31, 2021. Patients were categorized into mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19. The outcomes and predictors of survival at 4 weeks were analyzed. The survivors were also followed for 6 months and were studied for mortality, readmission rates, and infectious and non-infectious sequelae with reference to high-dose and standard-dose corticosteroids.

RESULTS

A total of 251 RTRs, 104 during the first wave and 147 during the second wave, were treated. Overall mortality was 15.1% (11.5% in the first wave vs. 17.5% in the second wave, p = .23). The use of high-dose steroids was also significantly high in non-survivors (85.8% vs. 11.3%, p = .001). On multivariate analysis, the severity of COVID-19, graft dysfunction, and high dose of corticosteroid therapy were associated with increased odds of mortality. Among survivors, 6-month mortality (17.3% vs. 0.5%, p = .001), readmission rate (91.3% vs. 23.7%, p = .001), fungal infection (30.4% vs. 2.2%, p < .001), and post-COVID lung sequelae (21.7% vs. 4.4%, p = .008) were significantly higher in the high-dose corticosteroid group than in the standard-dose group.

CONCLUSION

High-dose corticosteroid dosing in RTRs with COVID-19 was associated with increased infections, particularly fungal infections, and non-infectious sequelae with higher mortality on subsequent follow-up.

Impact of different urinary tract infection phenotypes within the first year post-transplant on renal allograft outcomes

In this study, we investigated the clinical impact of different urinary tract infection (UTI) phenotypes occurring within the first year after renal transplantation. The population included 2368 transplantations having 2363 UTI events. Patients were categorized into four groups based on their compiled UTI events observed within the first year after transplantation: (i) no colonization or UTI (n = 1404; 59%), (ii) colonization only (n = 353; 15%), (iii) occasional UTI with 1-2 episodes (n = 456; 19%), and (iv) recurrent UTI with ≥3 episodes (n = 155; 7%). One-year mortality and graft loss rate were not different among the four groups, but patients with recurrent UTI had a 7-10 ml/min lower eGFR at year one (44 ml/min vs. 54, 53, and 51 ml/min; p < .001). UTI phenotypes had no impact on long-term patient survival (p = .33). However, patients with recurrent UTI demonstrated a 10% lower long-term death-censored allograft survival (p < .001). Furthermore, recurrent UTI was a strong and independent risk factor for reduced death-censored allograft survival in a multivariable analysis (HR 4.41, 95% CI 2.53-7.68, p < .001). We conclude that colonization and occasional UTI have no impact on pertinent outcomes, but recurrent UTI are associated with lower one-year eGFR and lower long-term death-censored allograft survival. Better strategies to prevent and treat recurrent UTI are needed.

Analysis of Complications and Recipients' and Graft Survival in Patients 60 Years of Age and Older in the Long-Term Follow-up Period After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center, Paired Kidney Analysis

BACKGROUND

Long-term results of kidney transplant (KTx) in older patients may differ from younger recipients owing to increased cardiovascular comorbidities. The study aimed to analyze surgical and nonsurgical complications that develop in the long-term follow-up period after KTx, and factors that influence results of KTx in recipients aged 60 years and older (≥60) compared with younger recipients (<60).

METHODS

One hundred seventy-five patients aged ≥60 years and 175 patients aged <60 years who received a kidney graft from the same deceased donor were enrolled in the study. In the long-term follow-up period (3 months to 5 years after KTx) the incidence of surgical and nonsurgical complications, as well as patient and kidney graft survival, were compared. Additionally, the influence of early complications on patients and kidney graft survival was assessed.

RESULTS

There were no differences between recipients aged ≥60 years compared with recipients aged <60 years in occurrence of surgical complications (graft artery stenosis: 0.6% vs 2.3%; ureter stenosis: 3.4% vs 1.1%; lymphocele: 6.9% vs 3.4%) and nonsurgical complications (urinary tract infection: 19.4% vs 23.4%; pneumonia: 8.6% vs 8.6%; cytomegalovirus infection: 6.3% vs 8%; new-onset diabetes after transplant: 16.6% vs 17.1%; cancer incidence: 5.7% vs 4.6%; acute rejection episode: 13.1% vs 17.1%). Five-year recipient survival was lower in a group of patients aged ≥60 years (death, 15.4% vs 8%; death with functioning graft, 12% vs 5.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of surgical and nonsurgical complications, as well as kidney-graft survival, in recipients aged ≥60 years in a 5-year follow-up period is comparable to younger recipients aged <60 years.

The Prevalence and Risk Factors for Urinary Tract Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients in the First Year After Transplantation

Background: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) needs replacement therapy and most often, kidney transplantation is the best therapeutic option. Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most important complications after renal transplantation that affects transplantation outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to define the incidence rate, UTI risk factors among kidney transplant recipients, and causative organism of UTI and their antibiotic susceptibility. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we collected clinical, demographic, and laboratory data from 268 transplant recipients in Ali-Asghar Hospital from 2011 - 2018. Data collected from patients were analyzed with SPSS software version 25. Results: According to the results, 50 (18.7%) had UTI in the first year after renal transplantation. Female gender and underlying cause of renal failure were predisposing factors for UTI. The most common causative organism was Escherichia coli (58.4%). The antibiotic susceptibility results showed nitrofurantoin and meropenem as the most effective antibiotics for Escherichia coli. Conclusions: The UTI was more common in women and patients with analgesic nephropathy and lupus nephritis. The most common causative organism was E. coli and meropenem and nitrofurantoin were the most effective drug choices.

Impact of Late and Recurrent Acute Graft Pyelonephritis on Long-Term Kidney Graft Outcomes

Background

While Urinary tract infections are the most common infections in kidney transplant recipients, the impact of late acute graft pyelonephritis (AGPN) on graft outcomes remains unknown. Our study was performed to more precisely evaluate the long-term impact of AGPN.

Methods

We included 9052 kidney and combined kidney-pancreas recipients who underwent transplantation between 2008 and 2018 from a French multicenter cohort. The relationships between AGPN and patient and graft survival were analyzed with a time-dependent multivariate Cox model.

Results

The cumulative incidence of AGPN was 20.9%. A first episode of early AGPN is associated with a non-significant increase in the risk of graft failure (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.90 to 1.79). Though, cumulative number of AGPN episodes (HR = 1.51; 95% CI, 0.89 to 2.57 for two episodes and HR = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.17 to 3.69 for three or more episodes) is associated with an increased risk of graft failure. In contrast, when the first episode of AGPN occurred late (i.e., 6 months post transplantation), the risk of graft failure is significantly increased (HR = 2.25; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.07), and this risk remains relatively stable with the recurrence of late AGPN episodes. The onset of late AGPN were also associated with a higher risk of patient death.

Conclusion

This analysis shows that late AGPN and recurrent AGPN are both risk factors for a poor long-term graft outcome and mortality. Late AGPN should not be considered benign infections in post-transplantation follow-up.

Construction of a nursing solution to prevent and control urinary tract infection in the early stages of kidney transplantation

Background

To construct a nursing solution for the prevention and control of urinary tract infection (UTI) in the early stage after kidney transplantation, and to provide systematic and standardized nursing intervention measures for patients in the early stage after kidney transplantation.

Methods

The preliminary draft of intervention plan was formulated based on risk factor analysis research results of early UTI after kidney transplantation, combined with theoretical research, literature review, and research group meeting. The Delphi method was used to consult 15 experts for two rounds, and the entries were modified according to the opinions of the experts.

Results

After two rounds of consultation, the expert opinions tended to be consistent, and expert authority coefficient was 0.87. The Kendall harmony coefficient of importance and feasibility indexes of the two rounds of consultation were 0.407, 0.651 and 0.545, 0.686, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P<0.001). The nursing solution consisted of eight first-level indexes and 35 second-level indexes. The eight first-level indexes included admission symptom evaluation, UTI monitoring, health education, sports intervention, nutrition intervention, ward management, risk factor prevention and nursing, and psychosocial intervention.

Conclusions

This study constructed a scientific and reliable nursing solution for the prevention and control of early UTI after kidney transplantation, which is hugely important for guiding clinical nursing work.

The potential utility of fecal (or intestinal) microbiota transplantation in controlling infectious diseases

The intestinal microbiota is recognized to play a role in the defense against infection, but conversely also acts as a reservoir for potentially pathogenic organisms. Disruption to the microbiome can increase the risk of invasive infection from these organisms; therefore, strategies to restore the composition of the gut microbiota are a potential strategy of key interest to mitigate this risk. Fecal (or Intestinal) Microbiota Transplantation (FMT/IMT), is the administration of minimally manipulated screened healthy donor stool to an affected recipient, and remains the major 'whole microbiome' therapeutic approach at present. Driven by the marked success of using FMT in the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, the potential use of FMT in treating other infectious diseases is an area of active research. In this review, we discuss key examples of this treatment based on recent findings relating to the interplay between microbiota and infection, and potential further exploitations of FMT/IMT.

How to adapt an intestinal microbiota transplantation programme to reduce the risk of invasive multidrug-resistant infection

BACKGROUND

Vulnerable patients with intestinal colonization of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are recognized to be at increased risk of invasive MDRO-driven infection. Intestinal microbiota transplantation (IMT, also called faecal microbiota transplant) is the transfer of healthy screened donor stool to an affected recipient, and recent interest has focused on its impact on the reduction of invasive MDRO infection.

OBJECTIVES

To describe how to establish a clinical IMT pathway for patients at risk of MDRO invasive infection, with special considerations for optimizing administration and assessment of endpoints.

SOURCES

Expert guidelines and peer-reviewed clinical studies are encompassed and discussed.

CONTENT

IMT is offered to patients with MDROs detected on rectal or stool screening and either at risk of MDRO invasive infection due to altered immune status or those with recurrent MDRO-mediated invasive disease and considered at risk of further disease. Donor screening should include pathogens with theoretical or demonstrated risk of transmission (including MDROs themselves and SARS-CoV-2) and take into consideration the relative immunosuppressed state of potential recipients. Delivery of IMT is timed for when the patient is free from active infection, but no additional antibiotics are indicated. If administered when future immunosuppression is to take place, IMT is aligned at least 2 weeks beforehand to ensure sufficient time for engraftment. Patients are followed up in terms of adverse effects from IMT and clinicians are advised to discuss with the IMT multidisciplinary team on choice of antibiotics if needed to take into consideration the impact upon the intestinal microbiome. Prevention of invasive disease is the primary measure of success, rather than using intestinal decolonization as a binary outcome. Repeat IMT is considered case by case.

IMPLICATIONS

Future research areas should include randomized studies that consider clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness, and better understanding of mechanisms to identify markers of treatment success and functional microbiome components that could be used therapeutically.

Association between acute graft pyelonephritis and kidney graft survival: A single-center observational study

The association between acute graft pyelonephritis (AGPN) and graft failure in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) remains controversial. In this single-center observational study, we aimed to assess the incidence of AGPN as a time-dependent posttransplantation event. We also examined the association between the diagnosis of AGPN and graft outcomes. In total, we evaluated 1480 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2007 and December 2017. During a median follow-up of 5.04 years, we observed 297 AGPN episodes that occurred in 158 KTR. To evaluate the association between AGPN and clinical outcomes, we performed Cox proportional hazards regression analyses in which AGPN was entered as a time-dependent covariate. AGPN was independently associated with an increased risk of graft loss (hazard ratio = 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-2.64, p < .03) and a persistently decreased eGFR (fixed effect on intercept: -2.29 ml/min/1.73 m² ; 95% CI: from -3.23 to -1.35, p < .01). However, neither mortality nor biopsy-proven acute rejection was found to correlate with AGPN. Moreover, recurrent AGPN episodes did not appear to have an additive detrimental impact on graft loss. These data represent a promising step in understanding whether AGPN prevention may decrease the risk of graft loss in KTR.

A Current Review of the Etiology, Clinical Features, and Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Renal Transplant Patients

Urinary tract infection (UTI) represents the most common infection after kidney transplantation and remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, with a potential impact on graft survival. UTIs after KT are usually caused by Gram-negative microorganisms. Other pathogens which are uncommon in the general population should be considered in KT patients, especially BK virus since an early diagnosis is necessary to improve the prognosis. UTIs following kidney transplantation are classified into acute simple cystitis, acute pyelonephritis/complicated UTI, and recurrent UTI, due to their different clinical presentation, prognosis, and management. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) represents a frequent finding after kidney transplantation, but ASB is considered to be a separate entity apart from UTI since it is not necessarily a disease state. In fact, current guidelines do not recommend routine screening and treatment of ASB in KT patients, since a beneficial effect has not been shown. Harmful effects such as the development of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and a higher incidence of Clostridium difficile diarrhea have been associated with the antibiotic treatment of ASB.

Incidence and risk factors for urinary tract infections in the first year after renal transplantation

Background

The most common infections among renal transplant patients are urinary tract infections (UTI). Our main objective in this study is to determine the incidence of UTIs in patients who have undergone renal transplantation in our hospital, to identify the causative microbiological agents, risk factors and determine the effects of UTI on short-term graft survival.

Methods

Urinary tract infections, which developed within the first year of renal transplantation, were investigated. Patients were compared regarding demographic, clinical, laboratory characteristics and graft survival.

Results

102 patients were included in our study. Fifty-three patients (53%) were male and 49 (48%) were female. Sixty-seven urinary tract infection attacks in 21 patients (20.5%) were recorded. Age (p = 0.004; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.032–1.184), longer indwelling urinary catheter stay time (p = 0.039; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.013–1.661) and urologic complications (p = 0.006; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.001–0.320) were found as risk factors for UTI development in the first year of transplantation. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most frequently isolated microorganisms. Of these bacteria, 63.2% were found to be extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) positive. Multidrug resistant microorganisms (MDROs) were more frequent in male patients (32 episodes in males vs. 14 episodes in females, p = <0.001). UTI had no negative impact on short-term graft survival.

Conclusion

Our study results represent the high incidence of UTI with MDROs in KT recipients. Infection control methods should be applied even more vigorously especially in male transplant patients since a higher incidence of UTI caused by resistant microorganisms was reported in male patients.

Disease Prevention Not Decolonization: A Model for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients Colonized With Multidrug-resistant Organisms

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) yields variable intestinal decolonization results for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). This study showed significant reductions in antibiotic duration, bacteremia, and length of stay in 20 patients colonized/infected with MDRO receiving FMT (compared with pre-FMT history, and a matched group not receiving FMT), despite modest decolonization rates.

Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial

Background

Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Fosfomycin (FOS) is an attractive alternative for prophylaxis because it does not interact with immunosuppressants; although 90% is excreted unchanged in the urine, it does not require adjustment for renal function for single dose prophylaxis.

Methods

RTRs were recruited into this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive one 4 g dose of FOS disodium intravenously 3 h (FOS group) or placebo (placebo group) before placement and removal of a urinary catheter and before removal of a double-J ureteral stent. All participants received prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The main outcome was a comparison of the mean number of symptomatic UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) episodes per patient during a 7-week follow-up period. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NTC03235947.

Results

Eighty-two participants were included (41 in the FOS group and 41 in placebo group). The mean number of AB or symptomatic UTI episodes per patient was lower in the FOS group [intention-to-treat (ITT) 0.29 versus 0.60, P = 0.04]. The incidence of symptomatic UTI was lower in the FOS group (ITT, 7.3% versus 36.6%, P = 0.001), and there was no difference in the incidence of AB between both groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups.

Conclusions

FOS addition is an effective and safe strategy to reduce the number of symptomatic UTIs during the first 7 weeks after renal transplant.

Analysis of risk factors for early urinary tract infection after kidney transplantation

Background

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common kind of infection in the early stage after kidney transplantation. Although many studies have investigated the risk factors for UTI following kidney transplantation, few studies have focused on the risk factors for UTI in the early stage after transplantation.

Methods

The early-stage data of patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2018 and December 2019 in a first-class tertiary hospital in Suzhou, China, were retrospectively analyzed. The general and UTI information of the recipients was subjected to univariate analysis. Variables with statistical significance in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results

A total of 129 recipients were recruited, among whom 62 patients had a UTI in the early stage after kidney transplantation (48.1%), and the median (interquartile range) of onset time was 5 (4, 10) days after the surgery. A total of 324 strains of UTI pathogens were detected in the 62 recipients after kidney transplantation, 279 of which were gram-negative bacilli (86.1%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that female sex and delayed graft function (DGF) were independent risk factors for early-stage UTI, with odds ratios of 0.095 and 3.753, respectively.

Conclusions

The incidence of early UTI after kidney transplantation is high. Females and DGF patients are more prone to UTIs. Comprehensive prevention and treatment measures should be taken as early as possible against the risk factors to reduce the incidence of UTI.

Institutional protocol adherence in the incidence of recurrent urinary tract infection after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) occur frequently after kidney transplantation (KT), however their optimal management remains undefined. This study aimed to identify risk factors for rUTI and to validate a protocol for UTI and rUTI treatment after KT.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study involved patients undergoing KT between January 2013 and July 2016. Patients were followed-up from day of KT until graft loss, death or end of follow-up (31 December 2018). We analysed all episodes of symptomatic UTI. The main outcome measure was rUTI after KT. Analysis was done per episode in a multilevel approach; patient features were considered in the distal level and UTI features in the proximal level. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by Cox regression. A propensity score was used to adjust the risk of patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

RESULTS

During the study period, 787 patients underwent KT, of whom 152 (19.3%) developed 356 UTI episodes. The most common micro-organisms wereEscherichia coli (165/356; 46.3%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (101/356; 28.4%). Multidrug-resistant micro-organisms were isolated in 161 UTIs (45.2%). Risk factors for rUTI were diabetic nephropathy as the cause of end-stage renal disease (P = 0.02), UTI in first 180 days after KT (P = 0.04), anatomic alteration of the urinary tract at UTI diagnosis (P = 0.004) and length of time to effective therapy (P = 0.002); UTI treatment duration according to institutional protocol (P = 0.04) was the only protective factor identified.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate therapy duration has an impact on rUTI prevention after KT.

Gut commensal microbiota and decreased risk for Enterobacteriaceae bacteriuria and urinary tract infection

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common complication in kidney transplant recipients and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Recent evidence supports a role for the gut as a source for UTIs but little is known about the relationship between gut commensal bacteria and UTI development. We hypothesized that the abundance of gut commensal bacteria is associated with a lower risk of developing bacteriuria and UTIs. We performed gut microbiome profiling using 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the V4-V5 hypervariable region on 510 fecal specimens in 168 kidney transplant recipients. Fifty-one kidney transplant recipients (30%) developed Enterobacteriaceae bacteriuria within the first 6 months after transplantation (Enterobacteriaceae Bacteriuria Group) and 117 did not (No Enterobacteriaceae Bacteriuria Group). The relative abundances of Faecalibacterium and Romboutsia were significantly higher in the fecal specimens from the No Enterobacteriaceae Bacteriuria Group than those from the Enterobacteriaceae Bacteriuria Group (Adjusted P value<.01). The combined relative abundance of Faecalibacterium and Romboutsia was inversely correlated with the relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae (r = -0.13, P = .003). In a multivariable Cox Regression, a top tercile cutoff of the combined relative abundance of Faecalibacterium and Romboutsia of ≥13.7% was independently associated with a decreased risk for Enterobacteriaceae bacteriuria (hazard ratio 0.3, P = .02) and Enterobacteriaceae UTI (hazard ratio 0.4, P = .09). In conclusion, we identify bacterial taxa associated with decreased risk for Enterobacteriaceae bacteriuria and Enterobacteriaceae UTI in kidney transplant recipients, which supports future studies on modulating the gut microbiota as a novel treatment for preventing UTIs.

Five compelling UTI questions after kidney transplant

PURPOSE

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common bacterial infection among infectious complications in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). After transplantation, infections can result from surgical complications, donor-derived infections, pre-existing recipient infections, and nosocomial infections. Post-transplant infection is still a major cause of morbidity, mortality, graft dysfunction and rejection. In this paper, we aimed to review a few compelling questions in kidney transplantation (KTX).

METHODS

To identify relevant clinical questions regarding KTX and UTI a meeting was conducted among physicians involved in the KT program in our hospital. After discussion, several clinically relevant questions related to UTI after KTX. The 5 first rated in importance were judged generalizable to other clinical settings and selected for the purposes of this review.

RESULTS

Nearly half of the patients present in the first three months of transplant with UTI. The most common uropathogens in post-transplant UTIs are Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis. Risk factors for UTI include female sex, advanced age, recurrent UTI before transplant, prolonged urethral catheterization, delayed graft function, and cadaveric kidney transplant.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of post-transplant UTI is similar in both developed and developing countries. E.coli is the most common pathogen in most of studies. Cadaveric donor and post-dialysis transplantation are defined as independent risk factors for post-transplant UTI. Further studies are still required to identify risk factors after kidney transplantation and UTI's importance for graft function and patient outcome.

Lack of Impact of Acute Pyelonephritis on Kidney Graft Survival

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infection is the most common bacterial infection after kidney transplant. Some studies suggested that urinary tract infection could impair graft survival, but this issue remains debated. The objective of this study was to analyze the association between acute pyelonephritis (APN) and the risk of kidney graft failure.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients who received a kidney transplant from 2001 to 2009 at a university hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. They were followed until December 2015. The primary outcome was graft failure. Follow-up of patients who died with a functioning graft was censored on the date of death. Cox proportional hazards method was used in multivariable analysis to assess risk factors for graft failure. The occurrence of the first episode of APN and acute rejection were modeled as time-dependent variables.

RESULTS

A total of 587 patients were included. Of these, 112 recipients (19%) developed 173 episodes of APN. Graft failure occurred in 150 patients (25%) after a median follow-up of 79 months. The factors associated with graft failure in the multivariate analyses were age of the transplant recipient (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-0.99; P < .01), occurrence of delayed graft function (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.72-3.40; P < .01), and acute rejection (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.92-3.82; P < .01). There was no association between APN and graft failure (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65-1.68; P = .85).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the occurrence of APN is not associated with a significant reduction in graft survival after kidney transplant.

Safety and efficacy of methenamine hippurate for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections in adult renal transplant recipients: A single center, retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients (RTR).

METHODS

In this retrospective study we gathered clinical data from patients prescribed methenamine hippurate to prevent recurrent UTI pre- and post-intervention. Thirty-eight RTR ≥18 years old at Northwestern Memorial Hospital from 2006-2017 were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

The median and range for follow-up days were 365 (299-365) pre- vs 314 (105-365) post-methenamine. Total UTI frequency (9.16 vs 5.01/1000 patient follow-up days), days of antibiotic therapy to treat UTI (215 vs 132/1000 patient follow-up days), and hospitalization due to UTI (2.64 vs 1.07/1000 patient follow-up days) decreased while patients took methenamine. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most commonly identified cause of UTI both pre- and post-intervention. Drug resistant bacteria (ESBL-producing or VRE) affected 3 patients pre- and recurred in 1 of those patients plus 3 new patients post-methenamine. Methenamine had few adverse side effects for patients. One patient had nausea and 1 was intolerant.

CONCLUSION

We found that methenamine is well tolerated and is useful in reducing UTI, antibiotic prescriptions, and hospitalization in RTR with recurrent UTI. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Association of Double-J Stenting in Renal Transplant Patients With Urinary Tract Colonization and Infections in a Multidrug-resistant Microbe Endemic Nosocomial Environment

PURPOSE

We investigated the association of ureteral stenting after kidney transplantation with the development of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and/or urinary tract colonization, in a hospital environment considered endemic for multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae.

METHODS

Seventy-five recipients of deceased donor grafts were divided in groups A and B. Group A (with subgroups A1 and A2) included 45 transplanted patients without urinary stenting, and group B 30 patients with stenting. Subgroup A1 consisted of 30 patients transplanted before 2006, and A2 of 15 patients transplanted after 2006, when MDR, mainly carbapenem-resistant, Enterobacteriaceae, frequency has risen in our hospital.

RESULTS

The incidence and the number of UTIs per patient were significantly higher in patients without stenting compared to those with stenting. (Group A: 32/45 vs group B: 9/30, P < .001, and group A: 2.86 ± 0.43 vs group B: 0.6 ± 0.19, P < .01 respectively). Patients without stenting tended to have a higher frequency of recurrent UTIs compared to those with stenting (group A: 16/45 vs group B: 4/30, P < .05). Asymptomatic bacteriuria was more frequent in the patients with stent (group A: 8/45 vs group B: 14/30, P < .05). Further sub-comparison of the A1 and A2 subgroups with group B did not change the statistical results.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clinically significant association of ureteral stenting after kidney transplantation with the high frequency of MDR Gram-negative bacteria in our hospital.

Impact of Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A 4-Year Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most frequent bacterial infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), yet little is known about the impact of severe UTIs. We aimed to explore the burden of severe UTIs post renal transplant on both graft function and health care resources.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of KTRs with severe UTI warranting hospital admission at our center between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015.

RESULTS

We identified 198 UTI-related hospital admissions in 83 KTRs representing 7.4% of transplant admissions; 44.6% were men and 45 (54.2%) had recurrent admissions. The most commonly isolated pathogens were E coli (47.5%) and Klebsiella (16.2%): extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing organisms were detected in 31.3% of Klebsiella and in 25.5% of E coli. During UTI, the median serum creatinine increased from 126 to 196.5 μmol/L, then decreased to 149 and 161 μmol/L 3 months and 1 year after UTI, respectively. Acute kidney injury complicated 40.9% of UTIs (23.7% stage 1, 12.1% stage 2, 5.1% stage 3), with no significant difference between single and recurrent admission groups (χ² = 0.36, P = .5). The 1-year mortality and death-censored graft loss were 1.2% and 3.6%, respectively. The median length of hospital stay was 4 days (286 days per annum) and the estimated annual cost was £87,665 ($117,347).

CONCLUSIONS

UTI post renal transplant represents a substantial burden on health care resources and patient morbidity in terms of acute kidney injury and deterioration in graft function. Thus, applying proper preventative and management strategies is paramount.

Managing recurrent urinary tract infections in kidney transplant patients

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) are a common clinical problem in kidney transplant recipients. Due to the complex urological anatomy derived from the implantation of the kidney graft, the spectrum of the disease and the broad underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Recurrent UTI worsen the quality of life, decrease the graft survival and increase the costs of kidney transplantation. Areas covered: In this review, we describe the definitions, clinical characteristics, pathophysiological mechanisms and microbiology of recurrent urinary tract infections in kidney transplantations. The actual published literature on the management of recurrent urinary tract infections is based on case series, observational cohorts and very few clinical trials. In this review, the available evidence is compiled to propose evidence-based strategies to manage these complex cases. Expert commentary: The management of recurrent urinary tract infections in kidney transplant patients requires a proper diagnosis of the underlying mechanism. Early identification of structural or functional urological abnormalities, potentially amenable for surgical correction, is crucial for a successful management. The use of antibiotics to prevent recurrent infections should be carefully evaluated to avoid side effects and emergence of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms.