What is an isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutated central nervous system World Health Organization grade 2 glioma, or who should receive vorasidenib?

Epidemiological analysis of adult-type diffuse lower-grade gliomas and incidence and prevalence estimates of diffuse IDH-mutant gliomas in France

BACKGROUND

The recent advent of anti-IDH therapies and changes in the WHO classification of gliomas implies estimating the number of patients who could benefit (or not) from anti-IDH treatment. As published data on the current incidence of different subtypes of IDH-mutant gliomas (based on the latest histomolecular WHO classification) are lacking in many countries. The present analysis aims to review the main factors impacting the incidence of gliomas and lower-grade gliomas and to estimate the incidence and prevalence of IDH-mutant gliomas in France.

METHODS

Our analysis was based on data from the French Brain Tumor DataBase and literature.

RESULTS

Case definition, recording methods, histological classifications, age, sex, ethnicity, ancestry, environment, genetics, etc., impact the incidence of gliomas overall and lower-grade gliomas. In France, for the year 2024, the incidence estimates of all gliomas and all adult-type diffuse IDH-mutant gliomas are 6.6/100,000 and 1/100,000 person-years, respectively. The incidence estimates of grades 2, 3, and 4 diffuse IDH-mutant gliomas are 0.5, 0.3, 0.2 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Of note, the incidence estimate of grade 3 diffuse IDH-mutant glioma versus grade 2 or 4 is slightly more difficult to assess due to the possible variability in histological criteria to define tumor grade. The prevalence of diffuse IDH-mutant grade 2 glioma would be more than 6.57/100,000 persons.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Our epidemiological analysis provides estimates of potential number of patients, but large prospective real-world studies are required to determine the positioning of anti-IDH treatments among all therapeutic strategies [surgery(ies), chemotherapy(ies), radiotherapy(ies), clinical/radiological follow-up, etc.].

Who will benefit from vorasidenib? Review of data from the literature and open questions

The clinical efficacy of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitors in the treatment of patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant (mIDH) gliomas is a significant therapeutic advancement in neuro-oncology. It expands treatment options beyond traditional radiation therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy, which may lead to significant long-term neurotoxic effects while extending patient survival. The INDIGO study demonstrated that vorasidenib, a pan-mIDH inhibitor, improved progression-free survival for patients with grade 2 mIDH gliomas following surgical resection or biopsy compared to placebo and was well tolerated. However, these encouraging results leave a wake of unanswered questions: Will higher-grade mIDH glioma patients benefit? When is the appropriate timing to start and stop treatment? Where does this new treatment option fit in with other treatment modalities? In this study, we review the limited data available to start addressing these questions, provide a framework of how to discuss these gaps with current patients, and highlight what is needed from the neuro-oncology community for more definitive answers.

IDH inhibition in gliomas: from preclinical models to clinical trials

Gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumours in adults and cannot usually be cured with standard cancer treatments. Gliomas show intratumoural and intertumoural heterogeneity at the histological and molecular levels, and they frequently contain mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) or IDH2 gene. IDH-mutant adult-type diffuse gliomas are subdivided into grade 2, 3 or 4 IDH-mutant astrocytomas and grade 2 or 3 IDH-mutant, 1p19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas. The product of the mutated IDH genes, D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG), induces global DNA hypermethylation and interferes with immunity, leading to stimulation of tumour growth. Selective inhibitors of mutant IDH, such as ivosidenib and vorasidenib, have been shown to reduce D-2-HG levels and induce cellular differentiation in preclinical models and to induce MRI-detectable responses in early clinical trials. The phase III INDIGO trial has demonstrated superiority of vorasidenib, a brain-penetrant pan-mutant IDH inhibitor, over placebo in people with non-enhancing grade 2 IDH-mutant gliomas following surgery. In this Review, we describe the pathway of development of IDH inhibitors in IDH-mutant low-grade gliomas from preclinical models to clinical trials. We discuss the practice-changing implications of the INDIGO trial and consider new avenues of investigation in the field of IDH-mutant gliomas.

Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors in Glioma: From Bench to Bedside

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas are a primary malignancy of the central nervous system (CNS) malignancies, most commonly affecting adults under the age of 55. Standard of care therapy for IDH-mutant gliomas involves maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, despite good initial responses to multimodality treatment, recurrence is virtually universal. IDH-mutant gliomas represent a life-limiting prognosis. For this reason, there is a great need for novel treatments that can prolong survival. Uniquely for IDH-mutant gliomas, the IDH mutation is the direct driver of oncogenesis through its oncometabolite 2-hydroxygluterate. Inhibition of this mutated IDH with a corresponding reduction in 2-hydroxygluterate offers an attractive treatment target. Researchers have tested several IDH inhibitors in glioma through preclinical and early clinical trials. A phase III clinical trial of an IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitor vorasidenib yielded promising results among patients with low-grade IDH-mutant gliomas who had undergone initial surgery and no radiation or chemotherapy. However, many questions remain regarding optimal use of IDH inhibitors in clinical practice. In this review, we discuss the importance of IDH mutations in oncogenesis of adult-type diffuse gliomas and current evidence supporting the use of IDH inhibitors as therapeutic agents for glioma treatment. We also examine unresolved questions and propose potential directions for future research.