1
|
Agar MR, Nowak AK, Hovey EJ, Barnes EH, Simes J, Vardy JL, Wheeler HR, Kong BY, Leonard R, Hall M, Tim E, Spyridopoulos D, Sim HW, Lwin Z, Dowling A, Harrup R, Jennens R, Kichenadasse G, Dunlop T, Gzell C, Koh ES. Acetazolamide versus placebo for cerebral oedema requiring dexamethasone in recurrent and/or progressive high-grade glioma: phase II randomised placebo-controlled double-blind study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023; 13:354-362. [PMID: 36807048 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Symptoms of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) in recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) generally require corticosteroid treatment, often causing toxicity with variable effects on ICP symptoms. Acetazolamide reduces ICP when used in other clinical non-cancer settings. The aim of the study was to explore whether the addition of oral acetazolamide enables safe dexamethasone dose reduction in management of raised ICP in recurrent HGG. METHODS Participants had recurrent HGG with any of dexamethasone recommencement, dose increase or dependency; prior/current bevacizumab was an exclusion. Eligible participants were randomised 1:1 to acetazolamide or placebo for 8 weeks. Standardised protocols were used for dexamethasone dosing, with planned dose decrease from day 5 once ICP symptoms were stable. The primary endpoint was a composite of dexamethasone dose reduction and stable Karnofsky Performance Status Secondary endpoints included toxicity and feasibility. RESULTS Thirty participants (15 per group) were enrolled (mean age 58 years) from seven Australian sites. The mean baseline dexamethasone dose was 6.2 mg. Mean duration on study treatment was 38 days (placebo group) and 31 days (acetazolamide group) with nine participants (30%) completing all study treatments (six placebo, three acetazolamide). Study withdrawal was due to adverse events (n=6; one placebo, five acetazolamide) and disease progression (n=6 (three per arm)). Four participants (13%) (two per arm) were stable responders. Ten participants experienced a total of 13 serious adverse events (acetazolamide arm: five participants (33%), six events, two related). CONCLUSIONS The study closed early due to poor accrual and increasing availability of bevacizumab. The addition of acetazolamide did not facilitate dexamethasone reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12615001072505.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meera R Agar
- Palliative Care, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Hovey
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - John Simes
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Janette L Vardy
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Helen R Wheeler
- Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Benjamin Y Kong
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Leonard
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Merryn Hall
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Evonne Tim
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Hao-Wen Sim
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Zarnie Lwin
- Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anthony Dowling
- Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rosemary Harrup
- Medical Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Ross Jennens
- Medical Oncology, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ganessan Kichenadasse
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Health Care, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tracey Dunlop
- Medical Oncology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cecelia Gzell
- Genesis Care Pty Ltd, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
King AL, Shuboni-Mulligan DD, Vera E, Crandon S, Acquaye AA, Boris L, Burton E, Choi A, Christ A, Grajkowska E, Jammula V, Leeper HE, Lollo N, Penas-Prado M, Reyes J, Theeler B, Wall K, Wu J, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS. Exploring the prevalence and burden of sleep disturbance in primary brain tumor patients. Neurooncol Pract 2022; 9:526-535. [PMID: 36388423 PMCID: PMC9665069 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleep disturbance (SD) is common in patients with cancer and has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. This cross-sectional study explored the prevalence of SD in a primary brain tumor (PBT) population, identified associated demographic and clinical characteristics, and investigated co-occurrence of SD with other symptoms and mood disturbance. METHODS Demographic, clinical characteristics, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor, and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Depression and Anxiety Short-Forms were collected from PBT patients at study entry. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and independent t-tests were used to report results. RESULTS The sample included 424 patients (58% male, 81% Caucasian) with a mean age of 49 years (range 18-81) and 58% with high-grade gliomas. Moderate-severe SD was reported in 19% of patients and was associated with younger age, poor Karnofsky Performance Status, tumor progression on MRI, and active corticosteroid use. Those with moderate-severe SD had higher overall symptom burden and reported more moderate-severe symptoms. These individuals also reported higher severity in affective and mood disturbance domains, with 3 to 4 times higher prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. The most frequently co-occurring symptoms with SD were, drowsiness, and distress, though other symptoms typically associated with tumor progression also frequently co-occurred. CONCLUSIONS PBT patients with moderate-severe SD are more symptomatic, have worse mood disturbance, and have several co-occurring symptoms. Targeting interventions for sleep could potentially alleviate other co-occurring symptoms, which may improve life quality for PBT patients. Future longitudinal work examining objective and detailed subjective sleep reports, as well as underlying genetic risk factors, will be important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L King
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Dorela D Shuboni-Mulligan
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Sonja Crandon
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alvina A Acquaye
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa Boris
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Eric Burton
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Anna Choi
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alexa Christ
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ewa Grajkowska
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Varna Jammula
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Heather E Leeper
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicole Lollo
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer Reyes
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Brett Theeler
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathleen Wall
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Jing Wu
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Panda PK, Gupta T, Jalali R. A Practice Pilot Survey on the Current Use of Corticosteroid Therapy in Brain Tumor Patients. Neurol India 2022; 70:1896-1900. [PMID: 36352584 DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.359216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This pilot survey aims to provide an insight into the variations of corticosteroid prescription among health care professionals across the Indian subcontinent and serve as a prerequisite for the future development of corticosteroid therapy guidelines in brain tumor patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants of this anonymized online questionnaire-based survey included health care professionals involved in treating brain tumor patients. Unique links were electronically mailed to health care professionals from a database populated from professional associations. Descriptive statistical analysis, Chi-square test, and/or exact test were used for data analysis. RESULTS Seventy-three percent of the respondents were radiation oncologists followed by neurosurgeons (23%), medical oncologists (2%), and other specialties (2%). Raised intracranial pressure (90%) was the commonest indication for prescribing corticosteroids. Fifty percent of neurosurgeons preferred corticosteroids to be given routinely for all patients undergoing surgery for brain tumors while 64% of the radiation oncologists would prescribe based on imaging findings and/or on appearance of neurologic symptoms. Most of the respondents (90%) used a flat dosage pattern for determining the starting dose of corticosteroids. Emerging data about the long-term use of corticosteroids having a negative impact on the survival of brain tumor patients were not known by 52% of the respondents. The majority of the practitioners (94%) agreed regarding the formulation of evidence-based guidelines for prescribing corticosteroids in brain tumor patients. CONCLUSION In view of the wide variations of corticosteroid therapy practices among health care professionals across various parts of the world, our pilot survey provides significant information which can act as a suitable benchmark to form uniform practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pankaj K Panda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Tejpal Gupta
- Neuro-Oncology Disease Management Group, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Rakesh Jalali
- Neuro-Oncology Disease Management Group, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rogers JL, De La Cruz Minyety J, Vera E, Acquaye AA, Payén SS, Weinberg JS, Armstrong TS, Weathers SPS. Assessing mobility in primary brain tumor patients: A descriptive feasibility study using two established mobility tests. Neurooncol Pract 2022; 9:219-228. [PMID: 35601968 PMCID: PMC9113321 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with primary brain tumors (PBT) face significant mobility issues related to their disease and/or treatment. Here, the authors describe the preliminary utility and feasibility of two established mobility measures, the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) and Five-Times Sit-to-Stand (TSS) tests, in quickly and objectively assessing the mobility status of PBT patients at a single institution's neuro-oncology clinic. Methods Adult patients undergoing routine PBT care completed the TUG/TSS tests and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor module (MDASI-BT), which assessed symptom burden and interference with daily life, during clinic visits over a 6-month period. Research staff assessed feasibility metrics, including test completion times/rates, and collected demographic, clinical, and treatment data. Mann-Whitney tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Spearman's rho correlations were used to interrogate relationships between TUG/TSS test completion times and patient characteristics. Results The study cohort included 66 PBT patients, 59% male, with a median age of 47 years (range: 20-77). TUG/TSS tests were completed by 62 (94%) patients. Older patients (P < .001) and those who were newly diagnosed (P = .024), on corticosteroids (P = .025), or had poor (≤80) KPS (P < .01) took longer to complete the TUG/TSS tests. Worse activity-related (work, activity, and walking) interference was associated with longer TUG/TSS test completion times (P < .001). Conclusions The TUG/TSS tests are feasible for use among PBT patients and may aid in clinical care. Older age, being newly diagnosed, using corticosteroids, poor (≤80) KPS, and high activity-related interference were associated with significant mobility impairment, highlighting the tests' potential clinical utility. Future investigations are warranted to longitudinally explore feasibility and utility in other practice and disease settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Rogers
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA,Corresponding Author: James L. Rogers, BS, Cancer Research Training Award Fellow, Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9030 Old Georgetown Rd., Bethesda, MD 20892, USA ()
| | - Julianie De La Cruz Minyety
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alvina A Acquaye
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Samuel S Payén
- Center for Nursing Research, Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shiao-Pei S Weathers
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Medical and Neurological Management of Brain Tumor Complications. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2021; 21:53. [PMID: 34545509 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-021-01142-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The diagnosis of brain tumors often leads to complications that are either related to the tumor itself or the tumor-directed and supportive therapies, increasing the burden on the patients' quality of life and even survival. This article reviews the medical and neurological conditions that commonly complicate the disease course of brain tumors patients. RECENT FINDINGS Various mechanisms have been newly identified to be involved in the pathophysiology of seizures and brain edema and can help advance the treatment of such complications. There have also been new developments in the management of thromboembolic disease and cognitive impairment. Medical and neurological complications are being identified more often in brain tumor patients with the improved survival provided by therapeutic advances. Early and proper identification and management of such complications are crucial for a better survival and quality of life.
Collapse
|
6
|
Willis KD, Ravyts SG, Lanoye A, Loughan AR. Sleep disturbance in primary brain tumor: prevalence, risk factors, and patient preferences. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:741-748. [PMID: 34368887 PMCID: PMC8349701 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06476-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Primary brain tumor (PBT) patients report sleep disturbance due to their disease and treatment, yet few studies have utilized validated measures to understand the extent of patients' concerns and preferences for treatment. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine the prevalence and associated risk factors of sleep disturbance among PBT patients in our clinic and to evaluate interest in treatment for sleep disturbance. METHODS PBT patients completed validated measures of sleep disturbance and health during routine neuro-oncology visits. Patients also reported on sleep-related symptom management and their preferences for pharmacological and/or behavioral treatment. RESULTS Sleep disturbance was common, with 61.5% of PBT patients (N = 119; Mage = 52.60 years; 50% male) reporting poor sleep quality and 21.5% endorsing symptoms of insomnia. Insomnia could be explained by increased fatigue and corticosteroid use; sleep quality could be explained by fatigue. Patients in our clinic with higher grade tumors, significant sleep disturbance, of minority racial/ethnic status, and those not already taking sleep medications were more likely to report their symptoms and were not well-addressed by their medical team. Patients indicated a similar interest in pharmacological and behavioral treatment, warranting the availability of both in our clinic. CONCLUSIONS Findings indicate a high prevalence of sleep disturbance in PBT patients, highlighting the need for increased screening, monitoring, and treatment in our neuro-oncology clinic. Future research would benefit from assessing the efficacy of behavioral treatments for sleep disturbance in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelcie D Willis
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Scott G Ravyts
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Autumn Lanoye
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, VA, Richmond, USA.,Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Ashlee R Loughan
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, VA, Richmond, USA. .,Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hardy J, Haywood A, Rickett K, Sallnow L, Good P. Practice review: Evidence-based quality use of corticosteroids in the palliative care of patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med 2021; 35:461-472. [PMID: 33499759 DOI: 10.1177/0269216320986717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It would be unusual for a patient with advanced cancer not to be prescribed corticosteroids at some stage of their disease course for a variety of specific and non-specific indications. AIM The aim of this practice review was to provide a pragmatic overview of the evidence supporting current practice and to identify areas in which further research is indicated. DESIGN A 'state-of-the-art' review approach was used to examine the evidence supporting the use of corticosteroids for the management of cancer-related complications and in symptom control, in the context of known risks and harms to inform quality use of this medicine. We developed 'Do', 'Do not', and 'Don't know' recommendations based on current literature and identified areas for future investigation and research. DATA SOURCES We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane library from inception to 14th October 2020. Our initial search limited to reviews, reviews of reviews, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials was supplemented by supporting literature as appropriate. RESULTS Evidence to support common practice in the use of corticosteroids is lacking for most indications. This is in the context of strong evidence for the potential for significant toxicity and poor quality use of medicine. CONCLUSION Guidelines recommending the widespread use of corticosteroids should acknowledge the poor evidence base supporting much current dogma. Quality research is essential not only to define the role of corticosteroids in this context but to ensure good prescribing practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Hardy
- Mater Health, Brisbane, SEQ, Australia.,Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland (UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Alison Haywood
- Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland (UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Kirsty Rickett
- University of Queensland Library - Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Libby Sallnow
- St Christopher's Hospice and UCL Marie Curie Palliative Care Department, London, UK.,St Vincent's Private Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Phillip Good
- Mater Health, Brisbane, SEQ, Australia.,Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland (UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,St Vincent's Private Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jeon MS, Dhillon HM, Koh ES, Nowak AK, Hovey E, Descallar J, Miller L, Marshall NS, Agar MR. Exploring sleep disturbance among adults with primary or secondary malignant brain tumors and their caregivers. Neurooncol Pract 2020; 8:48-59. [PMID: 33664969 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Emerging evidence supports the clinical impact of sleep disturbance (SD) on cancer patients. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of SD in people with malignant brain tumors and caregivers, and explore any relationship between the patient-caregiver dyad's sleep. Methods Eighty-one adults with primary malignant (91%) or metastatic (9%) brain tumors and their family caregivers (n = 44) completed a series of self-report questionnaires, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Insomnia Severity Index, and the drowsiness item of The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor in an Australian ambulatory neuro-oncology setting. Participants were grouped by the PSQI cutoff (SD > 5), and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors. Results Of patients, 53% reported SD and 15% of those clinically significant insomnia, and 27% reported moderate to severe daytime drowsiness. Whereas anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain, neurocognitive symptoms, and antiemetic use were higher in patients with SD, fatigue and KPS were strong predictors of SD. In caregivers, 55% reported poor sleep and 13% clinical insomnia. Anxiety, caregiver burden, and comorbid illness were significantly associated with caregivers' SD. The individual's SD did not affect the chance of the other member of the patient-caregiver dyad experiencing SD. Conclusions More than half the sample had sleep disturbance, which was linked to many concomitant symptoms, such as fatigue in patients and anxiety in caregivers, potentially contributing to distress and functional impairment. Understanding underlying mechanisms of SD, the potential use of these clinical predictors in care settings, and options for management is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan S Jeon
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School, QEII Medical Centre Unit, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands WA, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Hovey
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joseph Descallar
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Lisa Miller
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Nathaniel S Marshall
- Woolcock Institute for Medical Research & Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Meera R Agar
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pidani AS, Siddiqui AR, Azam I, Shamim MS, Jabbar AA, Khan S. Depression among adult patients with primary brain tumour: a cross-sectional study of risk factors in a low-middle-income country. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e032748. [PMID: 32912937 PMCID: PMC7482499 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The prevalence of depression among patients with primary brain tumour ranges from 15% to 40% globally. Several individual and clinical factors contribute to the development of depression. However, their association with depression in Pakistani setting has not yet been assessed. Thus, we aim to study the factors associated with depression among adult patients with primary brain tumour at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. STUDY DESIGN A prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital of Karachi, Pakistan. PARTICIPANTS This study included 132 patients with confirmed diagnosis of primary brain tumour (initially diagnosed on MRI of the brain with contrast and later confirmed on histology of surgical specimen) in various stages of treatment. PRIMARY OUTCOME The primary outcome of this study was to assess depression and its associated factors among adult patients with primary brain tumour. Depression was assessed using a validated screening tool Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Scores of 10-27 on PHQ-9 were indicative of screen positive for depressive symptoms. A set of the structured pre-tested questions was used to evaluate patient-related, tumor-related and treatment-related factors. RESULTS Fifty-one (39%, CI: 33.33-46.94) patients in our study screened positive for depressive symptoms on PHQ-9. There was a significant association between depressive symptoms and Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) (prevalence ratio: 3.25 and CI: 1.87-5.62) after controlling covariates. Propensity scores predicted a positive association between KPS (functional status) and unemployment, treatment stage, and tumour recurrence. Tumor-related and treatment-related factors including tumour grade, location, type and hemispheric lateralisation were found insignificant. CONCLUSION Depression is common in patients with primary brain tumour. Impaired functional status has a direct impact on depression in these patients. Incorporating the psychosocial domain earlier in the course of treatment needs to be considered for better neuro-oncology management of patients with primary brain tumour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Iqbal Azam
- Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Adnan Abdul Jabbar
- Oncology, Aga Khan University Medical College Pakistan, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Shameel Khan
- Psychiatry, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sleep disturbance in people with brain tumours and caregivers: a survey of healthcare professionals' views and current practice. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:1497-1508. [PMID: 32712828 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05635-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Sleep disturbance is easily overlooked in subspecialty consultations and may remain untreated during and after initial treatment of malignant brain tumours (BT). This study aimed to explore perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) actively engaged in neuro-oncology care towards sleep disturbance in adults with primary or secondary BT and to identify facilitators and barriers to assessment and management of sleep disturbance. METHODS A survey was conducted to explore HCPs' perceptions about their knowledge, skills, and confidence in managing sleep disturbance in people with BT. The survey also explored their beliefs, motivation, and perceived role in managing sleep disturbance, and views on contributing external factors that impacted management. RESULTS Seventy-three interdisciplinary HCPs with average of 9.3 years of clinical experience in neuro-oncology participated. Fifty-five percent of participants were medical or radiation oncologists. Participants reported a high observed prevalence of sleep disturbance, especially in inpatient settings, during initial treatment, and after tumour progression or recurrence. Only 20% of participants reported routinely reviewing sleep-related symptoms during consultations. General symptom screening questions were perceived as helpful to identify sleep disturbance. Almost all respondents (92%) viewed corticosteroids as the most relevant risk factor, followed by psychological distress. The most frequent clinical responses were offering verbal advice and prescribing medication. The lack of time, resources, and training for managing sleep issues were commonly reported barriers. CONCLUSIONS Overall, participants perceived sleep disturbance as highly prevalent in neuro-oncology and positively viewed the importance of managing this symptom. Practical barriers to management were reported that future interventions can target.
Collapse
|
11
|
Cheah JTL, Robson JC, Black RJ, Goodman SM, Lester S, Mackie SL, Hill CL. The patient's perspective of the adverse effects of glucocorticoid use: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. From an OMERACT working group. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020; 50:996-1005. [PMID: 32911291 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain widely used. However, the impact of GCs from the perspective of the patient, rather than of the clinician, remains relatively unexplored. Additionally, no general patient reported outcome measure has been developed to assess the effects of GCs across rheumatological conditions. The aim of this literature review was to identify the adverse effects of systemic GC use that are of importance to patients. METHODS OVID EMBASE, OVID MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL was searched relating to three concepts: GCs, the patient perspective and adverse effects. A meta-synthesis of the qualitative data was performed separately by two independent researchers before qualitative metasummary was utilized to quantitatively aggregate the findings (combining quantitative and qualitative results), including the derivation of frequency and intensity effect sizes to identify those outcomes most prominently featured across all reviewed articles. RESULTS The initial search retrieved 1,356 articles, of which 25 (18 quantitative, 7 qualitative) were deemed suitable for quality assessment and data extraction. Four major themes emerged amongst the 71 discrete outcomes: physical symptoms (44), psychological symptoms (18), effect on participation (6) and contextual factors (3). CONCLUSIONS Patients with a broad range of inflammatory diseases and demographic features describe key cross-cutting themes in relation to GCs and their impact on health-related quality of life. This work will inform the development of a core domain set for clinical trials involving GCs and a patient reported outcome to measure impact of GCs from the patient's perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan T L Cheah
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Joanna C Robson
- Consultant Senior Lecturer in Rheumatology, Faculty of Health and Applied Science, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom; School of Clinical Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel J Black
- Consultant Rheumatologist, Rheumatology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Susan M Goodman
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Professor of Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, United States
| | - Susan Lester
- Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Chief Medical Scientist, Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sarah L Mackie
- Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine Chapel Allerton Hospital University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine L Hill
- Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Clinical Professor, Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Rheumatology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Neurocognitive functioning and health-related quality of life in adult medulloblastoma patients: long-term outcomes of the NOA-07 study. J Neurooncol 2020; 148:117-130. [PMID: 32367436 PMCID: PMC7280359 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03502-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Combined radiochemotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy with cisplatin, lomustine and vincristine within the NOA-07 study resulted in considerable short-term toxicity in adult medulloblastoma patients. Here we investigated the long-term impact of this treatment, focusing on neurocognitive functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods Neurocognitive functioning and HRQoL scores over time were determined, and differences between the post-treatment and follow-up assessments were calculated up to 18 months for neurocognition and 60 months for HRQoL. Results 28/30 patients were analyzed. The three preselected HRQoL scales (role, social and cognitive functioning) showed improved scores, to a clinically relevant extent (≥ 10 points), compared to post-treatment levels up to 30 months, but decreased afterwards. Z-scores for verbal working memory were worse during follow-up compared to post-treatment scores and remained impaired during 18 months follow-up (i.e. z-score below − 1 standard deviation). Attention was impaired post-treatment, and remained impaired to a clinically relevant extent during follow-up. Coordination/processing speed and lexical verbal fluency improved compared to post-treatment scores, and remained within the normal range thereafter. Other tests of verbal fluency were stable over time, with z-scores within the normal range. Conclusions This long-term follow-up study showed that the NOA-07 treatment regimen was not associated with a deterioration in HRQoL in the post-treatment period. Verbal working memory deteriorated, while other neurocognitive domains did not seem to be impacted negatively by the treatment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-020-03502-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
13
|
Jeon MS, Dhillon HM, Descallar J, Lam L, Allingham S, Koh ES, Currow DC, Agar MR. Prevalence and severity of sleep difficulty in patients with a CNS cancer receiving palliative care in Australia. Neurooncol Pract 2019; 6:499-507. [PMID: 31832221 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The literature describing the incidence of sleep difficulty in CNS cancers is very limited, with exploration of a sleep difficulty symptom trajectory particularly sparse in people with advanced disease. We aimed to establish the prevalence and longitudinal trajectory of sleep difficulty in populations with CNS cancers receiving palliative care nationally, and to identify clinically modifiable predictors of sleep difficulty. Methods A consecutive cohort of 2406 patients with CNS cancers receiving palliative care from sites participating in the Australian national Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration were evaluated longitudinally on patient-reported sleep difficulty from point-of-care data collection, comorbid symptoms, and clinician-rated problems. Multilevel models were used to analyze patient-reported sleep difficulty. Results Reporting of mild to severe sleep difficulties ranged from 10% to 43%. Sleep scores fluctuated greatly over the course of palliative care. While improvement in patients' clinical status was associated with less sleep difficulty, the relationship was not clear when patients deteriorated. Worsening of sleep difficulty was associated with higher psychological distress (P < .0001), greater breathing problems (P < .05) and pain (P < .05), and higher functional status (P < .001) at the beginning of care. Conclusions Sleep difficulty is prevalent but fluctuates widely in patients with CNS cancers receiving palliative care. A better-tailored sleep symptom assessment may be needed for this patient population. Early interventions targeting psychological distress, breathing symptoms, and pain for more functional patients should be explored to see whether it reduces sleep difficulties late in life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan S Jeon
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Joseph Descallar
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lawrence Lam
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
| | - Samuel Allingham
- Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, University of Wollongong, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - David C Currow
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
| | - Meera R Agar
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia.,IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Arvold ND, Armstrong TS, Warren KE, Chang SM, DeAngelis LM, Blakeley J, Chamberlain MC, Dunbar E, Loong HH, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Vogelbaum MA, Yuan Y, Weller M, van den Bent M, Wen PY. Corticosteroid use endpoints in neuro-oncology: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group. Neuro Oncol 2018; 20:897-906. [PMID: 29788429 PMCID: PMC6007454 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for peritumor edema but are often associated with significant side effects. Therapies that can reduce corticosteroid use would potentially be of significant benefit to patients. However, currently there are no standardized endpoints evaluating corticosteroid use in neuro-oncology clinical trials. Methods The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group has developed consensus recommendations for endpoints evaluating corticosteroid use in clinical trials in both adults and children with brain tumors. Results Responders are defined as patients with a 50% reduction in total daily corticosteroid dose compared with baseline or reduction of the total daily dose to ≤2 mg of dexamethasone (or equivalent dose of other corticosteroid); baseline dose must be at least 4 mg of dexamethasone daily (or equivalent dose of other corticosteroids) for at least one week. Patients must have stable or improved Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) score or Karnofsky performance status score or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) (Lansky score for children age <16 y), and an improved score on a relevant clinical outcome assessment tool. These criteria must be sustained for at least 4 weeks after baseline assessment to be considered a response, and are confirmed 4 weeks after that (ie, 8 wk after baseline assessment) to be considered a sustained response. Conclusions This RANO proposal for corticosteroid use endpoints in neuro-oncology clinical trials may need to be refined and will require prospective validation in clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils D Arvold
- St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Associates, St Luke’s Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Katherine E Warren
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lisa M DeAngelis
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jaishri Blakeley
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Erin Dunbar
- Piedmont Brain Tumor Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Herbert H Loong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - David R Macdonald
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David A Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Brain Tumor Institute at Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Manier KK, Rowe LS, Welsh J, Armstrong TS. The impact and incidence of altered body image in patients with head and neck tumors: a systematic review. Neurooncol Pract 2018; 5:204-213. [PMID: 31386002 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npy018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Body image dissatisfaction is a common issue among patients with cancer and is associated with difficulty coping, anxiety, and depression. Patients with tumors involving the head and neck are at increased risk of body image dissatisfaction due to the visible disfigurement that can occur from their illness and its treatment. Patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) malignancies often face similar tumor-related and treatment-related effects, yet there is limited research conducted in this population. Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the literature on body image in patients with tumors of the head and neck, and identify factors associated with body image alterations during treatment, with the intention of applying these approaches to those with CNS disease. A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed using predefined criteria. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for review. The literature collected showed a relationship between body image and age, depressive symptoms, and tumor grade or stage. In addition, body image disturbance had an impact on patients' daily functioning and psychosocial indices including anxiety, coping, and body reintegration. Evaluation of the impact of body image alterations in patients with CNS tumors is needed to direct clinical care, explore research opportunities, and improve patient quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karra K Manier
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute Building, Room, Bethesda, MD
| | - Lindsay S Rowe
- Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Building CRC, Room Bethesda, MD
| | - Judith Welsh
- NIH Library, National Institutes of Health, Building, Room, Bethesda, MD
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute Building, Room, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Corticosteroids are commonly used in the management of primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors and CNS metastases to treat cancer- and treatment-related cerebral edema and improve neurologic function. However, they are also associated with significant morbidity and mortality, given their wide range of adverse effects. PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the mechanism of action, pharmacology, and toxicity profile of corticosteroids and to critically appraise the evidence that supports their use in neuro-oncologic practice based on the latest scientific and clinical data. RECENT FINDINGS Recent data suggest that corticosteroids may negatively impact survival in glioma patients. In addition, corticosteroids should be incorporated as a standard criterion to assess a patient's clinical and radiographic response to treatment. Corticosteroids should be used judiciously in neuro-oncologic patients, given the potential deleterious effects on clinical outcome and patient survival. Anti-angiogenic agents, which lack these adverse effects, may be a reasonable alternative to corticosteroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ina Ly
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Armstrong TS, Shade MY, Breton G, Gilbert MR, Mahajan A, Scheurer ME, Vera E, Berger AM. Sleep-wake disturbance in patients with brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 2017; 19:323-335. [PMID: 27286798 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Sleep-wake disturbances are defined as perceived or actual alterations in sleep that result in impaired daytime functioning. Unlike other cancers, there is limited information about sleep-wake disturbances in adults with primary brain tumors throughout the illness trajectory. Sleep-wake disturbance is among the most severe and common symptoms reported by primary brain-tumor patients, particularly those undergoing radiation therapy. As with other cancers and neurologic illness, sleep-wake disturbance may also be clustered or related to other symptoms such as fatigue, depression, and cognitive impairment. There is increasing evidence for a genetic basis of normal sleep and sleep regulation in healthy adults. Specific mutations and single nucleotide variants have been reported to be associated with both fatigue and sleep-wake disorders, and both inflammation and alterations in circadian rhythms have been postulated to have a potential role. Guidelines for assessment and interventions have been developed, with cognitive behavioral therapy, exercise, and sleep hygiene demonstrating benefit in patients with other solid tumors. Further research is needed to identify risk and appropriate treatment in the brain-tumor patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcia Y Shade
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Ghislain Breton
- Department of Integrative Biology, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth Vera
- University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ann M Berger
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang KW, Valencia M, Banfield L, Chau R, Fleming A, Singh SK, Burrow S, de Souza RJ, Thabane L, Samaan MC. The effectiveness of interventions to treat obesity in survivors of childhood brain tumors: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 2016; 5:101. [PMID: 27301869 PMCID: PMC4908756 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0274-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 05/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children. Advances in understanding the hallmarks of cancer biology and novel therapies have led to an increasing number of survivors of childhood brain tumors (SCBT). However, these survivors are at an increased risk of obesity and cardiometabolic disorders that affect their quality of life and lifespan. It is important to define effective strategies to treat and prevent obesity in this population. This systematic review aims to investigate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery on treating obesity in SCBT. METHODS Searches will be conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effect (DARE). In addition, ClinicalTrials.gov and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I will be searched to identify relevant gray literature. The reference lists of eligible articles will be searched for additional studies. All screening, quality assessment, and data abstraction will be done independently by two reviewers. We will perform meta-analysis if there are sufficient studies. DISCUSSION This review will summarize evidence for the effectiveness of interventions used to reduce obesity risk in SCBT. This has significant implications for SCBT, as it can identify gaps in knowledge and provide insights into the development of new interventions to manage obesity in survivors, which may improve their outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42015025909.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuan-Wen Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, HSC-3A57, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, McMaster Children's Hospital, 1280 Main Street West, HSC-3A57, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Marlie Valencia
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, HSC-3A57, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, McMaster Children's Hospital, 1280 Main Street West, HSC-3A57, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Laura Banfield
- Health Sciences Library, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ruth Chau
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, HSC-3A57, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, McMaster Children's Hospital, 1280 Main Street West, HSC-3A57, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Adam Fleming
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, HSC-3A57, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sheila K Singh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,McMaster Stem Cell and Cancer Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Burrow
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Russell J de Souza
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, HSC-3A57, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Biostatistics Unit, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Constantine Samaan
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, HSC-3A57, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada. .,Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, McMaster Children's Hospital, 1280 Main Street West, HSC-3A57, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada. .,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|