Impact of Weekend Presentation on Short-Term Outcomes and Choice of Clipping vs Coiling in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Weekend admission for cervical spinal cord injury associated with shorter length of stay at private non-profit centers

OBJECTIVE

We assessed if weekend versus weekday admission for cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) influenced medical comorbidities, length of stay, and mortality while also exploring the role of hospital-specific factors.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (2015-2020) was queried for patients with CSCI. Propensity score matching (PSM) controlled for age, gender, hospital region, and illness severity, matching weekend admissions in a 1:1 ratio with weekday admissions. Parametric statistical tests then compared clinical and hospital-specific factors.

RESULTS

5036 patients were analyzed (mean age 56, 24 % female). Weekend admissions showed no increase in mortality (p = 0.305) despite a higher likelihood of shock (p = 0.0154), cervical fractures (p = 0.0408), and ventilatory support requirements (p < 0.001). Patients with spinal fractures had higher mortality than those with non-spinal fractures (p < 0.001). After stratification by weekend status, hospital ownership/control and hospital location/teaching status were significantly correlated with length of stay (p < 0.001, p = 0.0276, respectively). Private non-profit hospitals showed a shorter length of stay for weekend admissions (p = 0.00573), though fewer were discharged directly home (p = 0.0314). There was a weak association between payer type and disposition (Cramér's V = 0.146, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This national retrospective study revealed no difference in overall mortality rates between weekend and weekday admissions for patients presenting with CSCI. In patients with associated fractures, spinal fractures showed higher mortality rates than non-spinal fractures. Decreased length of stay was associated with weekend admissions to private non-profit centers, with no difference in mortality rates in this cohort.

Effect of Hospital Arrival Time on Functional Prognosis of Stroke Patients: Japan Stroke Data Bank Over 20 Years

AIMS

The impact of weekend/holiday and nighttime hospitalization on functional outcomes and long-term trends in stroke patients is unclear. We examined functional and life outcomes and changes over time.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical data of 203,176patients for hospital arrival day of week and 76,442patients for arrival times using Japan Stroke Data Bank. The endpoints were favorable outcome (Modified Rankin Scale[mRS]0-2), unfavorable outcome(mRS 5-6), and in-hospital mortality. We calculated odds ratios(OR) and 95% confidence interval(CI) of weekends/holidays and off-hours versus weekdays and on-hours for 2000-2009 and 2010-2020 using a mixed-effect multivariate model adjusted for confounding factors and evaluated interactions. Thereafter, we performed to check for year trends.

RESULTS

All endpoints were worse in weekend/holiday admissions for all stroke and in off-hours hospitalization for total stroke(TS), ischemic stroke(IS), and intracerebral hemorrhage(ICH). The adjusted ORs for favorable outcomes of weekend/holiday admissions were TS, 0.90(0.87-0.93); IS, 0.89(0.86-0.93); ICH, 0.91(0.84-0.98) and unfavorable outcome TS, 1.04(1.002-1.08) IS, 1.06(1.01-1.11). Off-hour hospitalization had adjusted ORs for favorable outcome(TS, 0.86 [95% CI: 0.82-0.91]; IS, 0.90 [0.84-0.95]; ICH, 0.85 [0.75-0.96]), unfavorable outcome(TS, 1.14 [1.07-1.22]; IS, 1.13 [1.04-1.23]; ICH, 1.15 [1.01-1.31]), and mortality (TS, 1.15 [1.05-1.26]; IS, 1.17 [1.04-1.32]). For IS, the incidence of unfavorable outcomes during off-hours was significantly lower in 2010-2020 than in 2000-2009; after adjusting for reperfusion therapy, it was no longer significant.

CONCLUSION

Stroke patients admitted on weekends/holidays and off-hours had worse functional and life outcomes. Functional outcomes for off-hour admission for IS improved at 10-year intervals, possibly due to improvements in stroke care systems.

The weekend effect in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a single centre experience and review

Clinical outcomes for patients admitted to hospital during weekend hours have been reported to be poorer than for those admitted during the week. Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating form of haemorrhagic stroke, with a mortality rate greater than 30%. A number of studies have reported higher mortality for patients with aSAH who are admitted during weekend hours. This study evaluates the effect of weekend admission on patients in our unit with aSAH in terms of time to treatment, treatment type, rebleeding rates, functional outcome, and mortality. We analysed a retrospective database of all patients admitted to our tertiary referral centre with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage between February 2016 and February 2020. Chi-square tests and t-tests were used to compare weekday and weekend demographic and clinical variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess for any association between admission during weekend hours and increased neurological morbidity (assessed via Glasgow Outcome Scale at 3 months) and mortality. Of the 571 patients included in this study, 191 were admitted during on-call weekend hours. There were no significant differences found in time to treatment, type of treatment, rebleeding rates, neurological morbidity, or mortality rates between patients admitted during the week and those admitted during weekend hours. Weekend admission was not associated with worsened functional outcome or increased mortality in this cohort. These results suggest that provision of 7-day cover by vascular neurosurgeons and interventional neuroradiologists in high-volume centres could mitigate the weekend effect sometimes reported in the aSAH cohort.

Analysis of the Weekend Effect at a High-Volume Center for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The "weekend effect" is the negative effect on disease course and treatment resulting from being admitted to the hospital during a weekend. Whether the weekend effect is associated with worse outcomes for patients treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is unknown. We assessed neurologic outcomes of patients with aSAH admitted during the weekend versus during the week.

METHODS

A retrospective database was reviewed to identify all patients with aSAH who received open or endovascular treatment from August 1, 2007, to July 31, 2019, at a quaternary center. The primary outcome was a poor neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2). Propensity adjustment included age, sex, treatment type, Hunt and Hess grade, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

RESULTS

A total of 1014 patients (women, 703 [69.3%]; men, 311 [30.7%]; mean age, 56 [standard deviation, 14]) met inclusion criteria; 726 (71.6%) had weekday admissions, and 288 (28.4%) had weekend admissions. There was no significant difference between patients with a weekday versus a weekend admission in mean (standard deviation) time to treatment (0.85 [1.29] vs. 0.93 [1.30] days, P = 0.10) or length of stay (19 [9] vs. 19 [9] days, P = 0.04). Total cost and rates of delayed cerebral ischemia and vasospasm were similar between the admission groups, both overall and within the open and endovascular treatment cohorts. After propensity adjustment, weekend admission was not a significant predictor of a modified Rankin Scale score greater than 2 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]; 1.12 [0.85-1.49]; P = 0.4).

CONCLUSION

No difference in neurologic outcomes was associated with weekend admission among this cohort of patients with aSAH.

Impact of Off-Hour Admission with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis assessed the impact of off-hour hospitalization (weekends, and evenings or nighttime on weekdays) on mortality and morbidity in patients with nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched for studies comparing outcomes between patients with nontraumatic SAH hospitalized during off-hour and on-hour periods (daytime on weekdays). The primary outcome was mortality (in-hospital and at different follow-up periods after hospitalization). Secondary outcomes included delays in treatment, and complications. Sensitivity analysis including only studies in which adjusted multivariate analyses were performed for any of the outcomes, and meta-regression controlling for clinically important patient factors, were also performed.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.09; P = 0.30) and at all follow-up periods (7/14 days and 1/3/6 months) after hospitalization between SAH patients who were admitted during off-hour compared with on-hour periods, despite adjusted multivariate meta-analysis being performed. However, patients who were admitted during off-hour periods experienced greater delays from their initial scan to treatment (mean difference, 42.7, 25.2-60.1 hours; P < 0.0001) and had higher rates of pneumonia (odds ratio, 1.65, 1.12-2.44; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis has not shown an increased risk of mortality in the short-term and long-term among patients with nontraumatic SAH who were hospitalized during off-hour compared with on-hour periods, despite adjusting for potentially confounding patient factors. The delays to treatment and higher observed rates of pneumonia highlight areas in which hospital services and resources should be targeted during these off-hour periods in patients presenting with nontraumatic SAH.

Impact of the weekend effect on outcome after microsurgical clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The "weekend effect" describes the assumption that weekend and/or on-call duty admission of emergency patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. For aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, we investigated, whether presentation out of regular working hours and microsurgical clipping at nighttime correlates with worse patient outcome.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients that underwent microsurgical clipping of an acutely ruptured aneurysm at our institution between 2010 and 2019. Patients admitted during (1) regular working hours (Monday-Friday, 08:00-17:59) and (2) on-call duty and microsurgical clipping performed during (a) daytime (Monday-Sunday, 08:00-17:59) and (b) nighttime were compared regarding the following outcome parameters: operation time, treatment-related complications, vasospasm, functional outcome, and angiographic results.

RESULTS

Among 157 enrolled patients, 104 patients (66.2%) were admitted during on-call duty and 48 operations (30.6%) were performed at nighttime. Admission out of regular hours did not affect cerebral infarction (p = 0.545), mortality (p = 0.343), functional outcome (p = 0.178), and aneurysm occlusion (p = 0.689). Microsurgical clipping at nighttime carried higher odds of unfavorable outcome at discharge (OR: 2.3, 95%CI: 1.0-5.1, p = 0.039); however, there were no significant differences regarding the remaining outcome parameters. After multivariable adjustment, clipping at nighttime did not remain as independent prognosticator of short-term outcome (OR: 2.1, 95%CI: 0.7-6.2, p = 0.169).

CONCLUSIONS

Admission out of regular working hours and clipping at nighttime were not independently associated with poor outcome. The adherence to standardized treatment protocols might mitigate the "weekend effect."

Impact of Off-Hour Hospital Presentation on Mortality in Different Subtypes of Acute Stroke in Korea : National Emergency Department Information System Data

Objective

Several studies have reported inconsistent findings among countries on whether off-hour hospital presentation is associated with worse outcome in patients with acute stroke. However, its association is yet not clear and has not been thoroughly studied in Korea. We assessed nationwide administrative data to verify off-hour effect in different subtypes of acute stroke in Korea.

Methods

We respectively analyzed the nationwide administrative data of National Emergency Department Information System in Korea; 7144 of ischemic stroke (IS), 2424 of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and 1482 of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), respectively. “Off-hour hospital presentation” was defined as weekends, holidays, and any times except 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM on weekdays. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality in different subtypes of acute stroke. We adjusted for covariates to influence the primary outcome using binary logistic regression model and Cox's proportional hazard model.

Results

In subjects with IS, off-hour hospital presentation was associated with unfavorable outcome (24.6% off hours vs. 20.9% working hours, p<0.001) and in-hospital mortality (5.3% off hours vs. 3.9% working hours, p=0.004), even after adjustment for compounding variables (hazard ratio [HR], 1.244; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.106–1.400; HR, 1.402; 95% CI, 1.124–1.747, respectively). Off-hours had significantly more elderly ≥65 years (35.4% off hours vs. 32.1% working hours, p=0.029) and significantly more frequent intensive care unit admission (32.5% off hours vs. 29.9% working hours, p=0.017) than working hours. However, off-hour hospital presentation was not related to poor short-term outcome in subjects with ICH and SAH.

Conclusion

This study indicates that off-hour hospital presentation may lead to poor short-term morbidity and mortality in patients with IS, but not in patients with ICH and SAH in Korea. Excessive death seems to be ascribed to old age or the higher severity of medical conditions apart from that of stroke during off hours.

Association between weekend admissions and mortality after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the "weekend effect" revisited

OBJECTIVE

Higher mortality has been reported with weekend or after-hours patient admission across a wide range of surgical and medical specialties, a phenomenon termed the "weekend effect." The authors evaluated whether weekend admission contributed to death and long-term neurological outcome in patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of the Clazosentan to Overcome Neurological Ischemia and Infarction Occurring After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (CONSCIOUS-1) study was conducted. Univariable and stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the associations between weekend admission and mortality and long-term neurological outcome.

RESULTS

Of 413 subjects included in the CONSCIOUS-1 study, 140 patients had been admitted during the weekend. A significant interaction was identified between weekend admission and neurological grade on presentation, suggesting that the outcomes of patients who had initially presented with a poor grade were disproportionately influenced by the weekend admission. On stepwise multivariable logistic regression in the subgroup of patients who had presented with a poor neurological grade (29 of 100 patients), admission on the weekend was found to be independently associated with death (OR 6.59, 95% CI 1.62-26.88, p = 0.009). Weekend admission was not associated with long-term neurological outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekend admission was an independent risk factor for death within 12 weeks following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients presenting with a poor neurological grade. Further work is required to identify and mitigate any mediating factors.

A Large Database Analysis of Rates of Aneurysm Screening, Elective Treatment, and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Patients With Polycystic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Professional societies provide conflicting guidelines on aneurysm screening in patients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD), and the rate of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate screening, elective treatment, and the rate of SAH in patients with known PKD.

METHODS

We examined longitudinally linked claims data from a large private insurer, identifying screening, elective treatment, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and secured aneurysmal SAH (saSAH) in 2004 to 2014 amongst patients with known PKD.

RESULTS

We identified 20 704 patients diagnosed with PKD. Among patients with an initial PKD diagnosis, 51/446 (15.9%) underwent angiographic screening within 2 yr. Forty aneurysms were treated electively in 48 868 yr at risk in PKD patients (82/100K patient yr, 95% confidence interval [CI] 60-112) vs 24 elective treatments in 349 861 yr at risk in age- and sex-matched controls (7/100K patient yr, 95% CI 5-10, P < .0001). Eleven admissions for aSAH were identified in PKD patients (23/100K patient yr, 95% CI 13-41) and 22 admissions for aSAH in controls (6/100K patient yr, 95% CI 4-10), giving an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 3.6 (95% CI 1.7-7.4, P < .0001) and a comorbidity-adjusted IRR of 3.1 (95% CI 1.4-6.9). The incidence of saSAH was proportionally even higher in PKD patients than controls, 16 vs 2/100K patient years, IRR 9.5 (95% CI 3.3-27.5, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Screening in PKD is performed only selectively, though resulting rates of elective treatment were over 10× those of controls. Despite screening and treatment, the rate of SAH remains significantly elevated over that of controls.

Weekend versus Weekday Admission in Spinal Cord Injury and Its Effect on Timing of Surgical Intervention

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare timing of intervention for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) requiring surgical procedures during weekend versus weekday admissions.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2014 was queried to identify patients with SCI who underwent surgical treatment (decompression with or without stabilization) as an emergent/urgent procedure. Timing of intervention, inpatient morbidity, and inpatient mortality were compared between patients admitted during the weekend versus a weekday. Multiple logistic regression analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 9390 patients were identified (mean age 55 years, 73.2% male) from the database, with 34.1% admitted during the weekend and 65.9% during a weekday. The average day of intervention for the entire cohort was 2.8 (SD 3.9, interquartile range 1-4); day 2.7 (standard deviation [SD] 4.0) versus day 2.8 ([SD] 3.9) for patients admitted in a weekend versus weekday (P = 0.418). After controlling for patient age, sex, and injury severity score on multiple logistic regression analysis, weekend admission was not significantly associated with early intervention (odds ratio [OR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.21; P = 0.993), complication occurrence (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86-1.38; P = 0.476), or inpatient mortality (OR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.44-1.56; P = 0.563). Patients with complete/American Spinal Injury Association A injuries were more likely to undergo early intervention (OR 2.09; 95% CI, 1.31-3.31; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In this national study, patients with SCI who were admitted during the weekend received surgical intervention as early as patients admitted during a weekday. Furthermore, no differences in complication or mortality rates between groups were found.