A prospective, multicentre, single-arm clinical trial of bevacizumab for patients with surgically untreatable, symptomatic brain radiation necrosis†

Case Report: Successful treatment of external beam radiation-induced optic papillopathy with intravitreal anti-VEGF

Three cases of optic disc edema arising from radiation optic neuropathy isolated to the intra-ocular optic nerve following external beam radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are presented. A literature review of the etiology, presentation, and treatment is included for discussion, along with proposed diagnostic criteria.

High-dose proton beam therapy versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

High-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) uses excellent dose concentricity based on the unique characteristic termed the Bragg peak. PBT is a highly feasible treatment option that improves survival in select patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, selection bias remains an issue in prior studies that evaluated the efficacy of PBT. The aim of the present study was to compare the survival outcomes and toxicities of high-dose PBT and conventional radiation therapy (CRT) using propensity score-matched treatment cohorts.

METHODS

The analysis included patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated with high-dose PBT of 96.6 Gy (RBE) or CRT of 60 Gy from 2010 to 2020. Propensity score generation and 1:1 matching of patients were performed based on the following covariates: age, sex, tumor location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and pre-radiation Karnofsky performance scale score.

RESULTS

From a total of 235 patients, 26 were selected in each group by propensity score matching. The median overall survival (OS) of the PBT group was 28.3 months, while the median OS of the CRT group was 21.2 months. Although acute radiation-related toxicities were equivalent between the PBT and CRT groups, radiation necrosis as a late radiation-related toxicity was observed significantly more frequently in the PBT group.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose PBT provided significant survival benefits for patients with newly diagnosed GBM compared to CRT as shown by propensity score matching analysis. Radiation necrosis remains an issue in high-dose PBT; thus, the establishment of an effective treatment strategy centered on bevacizumab would be essential.

[Expert Consensus on the Treatment of Antiangiogenic Agents for Radiation Brain Necrosis]

Vascular damage is followed by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression at high levels, which is an important mechanism for cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) development. Antiangiogenic agents (Bevacizumab) alleviates brain edema symptoms caused by CRN through inhibiting VEGF and acting on vascular tissue around the brain necrosis area. Many studies have confirmed that Bevacizumab effectively relieves symptoms caused by brain necrosis, improves patients' performance status and brain necrosis imaging. Considering that the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy is mainly related to the duration of drug action, low-dose antiangiogenic agents can achieve favorable efficacy. Prevention is the best treatment. The occurrence of CRN is associated with tumor-related factors and treatment-related factors. By controlling these factors, CRN can be effectively prevented.
.

Review: Neurological Complications From Therapies for Pediatric Brain Tumors

Surgery, chemotherapy and radiation have been the mainstay of pediatric brain tumor treatment over the past decades. Recently, new treatment modalities have emerged for the management of pediatric brain tumors. These therapies range from novel radiotherapy techniques and targeted immunotherapies to checkpoint inhibitors and T cell transfer therapies. These treatments are currently investigated with the goal of improving survival and decreasing morbidity. However, compared to traditional therapies, these novel modalities are not as well elucidated and similarly has the potential to cause significant short and long-term sequelae, impacting quality of life. Treatment complications are commonly mediated through direct drug toxicity or vascular, infectious, or autoimmune mechanisms, ranging from immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome with CART-cells to neuropathy with checkpoint inhibitors. Addressing treatment-induced complications is the focus of new trials, specifically improving neurocognitive outcomes. The aim of this review is to explore the pathophysiology underlying treatment related neurologic side effects, highlight associated complications, and describe the future direction of brain tumor protocols. Increasing awareness of these neurologic complications from novel therapies underscores the need for quality-of-life metrics and considerations in clinical trials to decrease associated treatment-induced morbidity.

Resolution of radiation necrosis with bevacizumab following radiation therapy for primary CNS lymphoma

IMPORTANCE

Radiation necrosis (RN) is a rare but serious adverse effect following treatment with radiation therapy. No standard of care exists for the management of RN, and efforts to prevent and treat RN are limited by a lack of insight into the pathomechanics and molecular drivers of RN. This case series describes the outcomes of treatment with bevacizumab (BV) in two primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) patients who developed symptomatic biopsy-proven RN after whole brain radiation (WBRT) with a stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) boost.

OBSERVATIONS

Patient 1 is a 52 year-old female with PCNSL treated with WBRT followed by an SRS boost. She developed symptomatic biopsy-proven RN, and initial treatment with tocopherol and pentoxifylline was unsuccessful. A 100% clinical and radiographic response was achieved with 4 cycles of BV. Patient 2, a 48 year-old male with PCNSL, presented with seizures and biopsy-proven RN after radiation therapy. Initial empiric treatment with tocopherol and pentoxifylline was unsuccessful. A 100% clinical and radiographic response was achieved with 3 cycles of BV.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Monitoring for RN in patients with PCNSL treated with radiation therapy is warranted. BV is an efficacious treatment and a viable alternative to corticosteroids or surgical intervention.

Boron neutron capture therapy and add-on bevacizumab in patients with recurrent malignant glioma

BACKGROUND

Although boron neutron capture therapy has shown excellent survival data, previous studies have shown an increase in radiation necrosis against recurrent malignant glioma. Herein, we proposed that bevacizumab may reduce radiation injury from boron neutron capture therapy by re-irradiation. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a boron neutron capture therapy and add-on bevacizumab combination therapy in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent malignant glioma were treated with reactor-based boron neutron capture therapy. Treatment with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) was initiated 1-4 weeks after boron neutron capture therapy and was administered every 2-3 weeks until disease progression. Initially diagnosed glioblastomas were categorized as primary glioblastoma, whereas other forms of malignant glioma were categorized as non-primary glioblastoma.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (14 with primary glioblastoma and 11 with non-primary glioblastoma) were treated with boron neutron capture therapy and add-on bevacizumab. The 1-year survival rate for primary glioblastoma and non-primary glioblastoma was 63.5% (95% confidence interval: 33.1-83.0) and 81.8% (95% confidence interval: 44.7-95.1), respectively. The median overall survival was 21.4 months (95% confidence interval: 7.0-36.7) and 73.6 months (95% confidence interval: 11.4-77.2) for primary glioblastoma and non-primary glioblastoma, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% confidence interval: 4.2-12.1) and 15.6 months (95% confidence interval: 3.1-29.8) for primary glioblastoma and non-primary glioblastoma, respectively. Neither pseudoprogression nor radiation necrosis were identified during bevacizumab treatment. Alopecia occurred in all patients. Six patients experienced adverse events ≥grade 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Boron neutron capture therapy and add-on bevacizumab provided a long overall survival and a long progression-free survival in recurrent malignant glioma compared with previous studies on boron neutron capture therapy alone. The add-on bevacizumab may reduce the detrimental effects of boron neutron capture therapy, including pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis. Further studies of the combination therapy with a larger sample size and a randomized controlled design are warranted.

Salvage Surgical Resection after Linac-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastasis

Background: This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of salvage surgical resection (SSR) after stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/fSRT) for newly diagnosed brain metastasis. Methods: Between November 2009 and May 2020, 318 consecutive patients with 1114 brain metastases were treated with SRS/fSRT for newly diagnosed brain metastasis at our hospital. During this study period, 21 of 318 patients (6.6%) and 21 of 1114 brain metastases (1.9%) went on to receive SSR after SRS/fSRT. Three patients underwent multiple surgical resections. Twenty-one consecutive patients underwent twenty-four SSRs. Results: The median time from initial SRS/fSRT to SSR was 14 months (range: 2–96 months). The median follow-up after SSR was 17 months (range: 2–78 months). The range of tumor volume at initial SRS/fSRT was 0.12–21.46 cm³ (median: 1.02 cm³). Histopathological diagnosis after SSR was recurrence in 15 cases, and radiation necrosis (RN) or cyst formation in 6 cases. The time from SRS/fSRT to SSR was shorter in the recurrence than in the RNs and cyst formation, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.067). The median survival time from SSR and from initial SRS/fSRT was 17 and 74 months, respectively. The cases with recurrence had a shorter survival time from initial SRS/fSRT than those without recurrence (p = 0.061). Conclusions: The patients treated with SRS/fSRT for brain metastasis need long-term follow-up. SSR is a safe and effective treatment for the recurrence, RN, and cyst formation after SRS/fSRT for brain metastasis.

Bevacizumab vs laser interstitial thermal therapy in cerebral radiation necrosis from brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Radiation necrosis (RN) represents a serious post-radiotherapy complication in patients with brain metastases. Bevacizumab and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) are viable treatment options, but direct comparative data is scarce. We reviewed the literature to compare the two treatment strategies.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched. All studies of patients with RN from brain metastases treated with bevacizumab or LITT were included. Treatment outcomes were analyzed using indirect meta-analysis with random-effect modeling.

RESULTS

Among the 18 studies included, 143 patients received bevacizumab and 148 underwent LITT. Both strategies were equally effective in providing post-treatment symptomatic improvement (P = 0.187, I² = 54.8%), weaning off steroids (P = 0.614, I² = 25.5%), and local lesion control (P = 0.5, I² = 0%). Mean number of lesions per patient was not statistically significant among groups (P = 0.624). Similarly, mean T1-contrast-enhancing pre-treatment volumes were not statistically different (P = 0.582). Patterns of radiological responses differed at 6-month follow-ups, with rates of partial regression significantly higher in the bevacizumab group (P = 0.001, I² = 88.9%), and stable disease significantly higher in the LITT group (P = 0.002, I² = 81.9%). Survival rates were superior in the LITT cohort, and statistical significance was reached at 18 months (P = 0.038, I² = 73.7%). Low rates of adverse events were reported in both groups (14.7% for bevacizumab and 12.2% for LITT).

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab and LITT can be safe and effective treatments for RN from brain metastases. Clinical and radiological outcomes are mostly comparable, but LITT may relate with superior survival benefits in select patients. Further studies are required to identify the best patient candidates for each treatment group.

Radiation Necrosis from Stereotactic Radiosurgery-How Do We Mitigate?

OPINION STATEMENT

Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective and convenient treatment for many brain conditions. Data regarding safety come mostly from retrospective single institutional studies and a small number of prospective studies. Variations in target delineation, treatment delivery, imaging follow-up protocols and dose prescription limit the interpretation of this data. There has been much clinical focus on radiation necrosis (RN) in particular, as it is being increasingly recognized on follow-up imaging. Symptomatic RN may be treated with medical therapy (such as corticosteroids and bevacizumab) with surgical resection being reserved for refractory patients. Nevertheless, RN remains a challenging condition to manage, and therefore upfront patient selection for SRS remains critical to provide complication-free control. Mitigation strategies need to be considered in situations where the baseline risk of RN is expected to be high-such as large target volume or re-irradiation. These may involve reduction in the prescribed dose or hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT). Recently published guidelines and international meta-analysis report the benefit of HSRT in larger lesions, without compromising control rates. However, careful attention to planning parameters and SRS techniques still need to be adhered, even with HSRT. In cases where the risk is deemed to be high despite mitigation, a combination approach of surgery with or without post-operative radiation should be considered.

Determination of brain tumor recurrence using 11 C-methionine positron emission tomography after radiotherapy

We conducted a prospective multicenter trial to compare the usefulness of ¹¹C‐methionine (MET) and ¹⁸F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for identifying tumor recurrence. Patients with clinically suspected tumor recurrence after radiotherapy underwent both ¹¹C‐MET and ¹⁸F‐FDG PET. When a lesion showed a visually detected uptake of either tracer, it was surgically resected for histopathological analysis. Patients with a lesion negative to both tracers were revaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 months after the PET studies. The primary outcome measure was the sensitivity of each tracer in cases with histopathologically confirmed recurrence, as determined by the McNemar test. Sixty‐one cases were enrolled, and 56 cases could be evaluated. The 38 cases where the lesions showed uptake of either ¹¹C‐MET or ¹⁸F‐FDG underwent surgery; 32 of these cases were confirmed to be subject to recurrence. Eighteen cases where the lesions showed uptake of neither tracer received follow‐up MRI; the lesion size increased in one of these cases. Among the cases with histologically confirmed recurrence, the sensitivities of ¹¹C‐MET PET and ¹⁸F‐FDG PET were 0.97 (32/33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85‐0.99) and 0.48 (16/33, 95% CI: 0.33‐0.65), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .0001). The diagnostic accuracy of ¹¹C‐MET PET was significantly better than that of ¹⁸F‐FDG PET (87.5% vs. 69.6%, P = .033). No examination‐related adverse events were observed. The results of the study demonstrated that ¹¹C‐MET PET was superior to ¹⁸F‐FDG PET for discriminating between tumor recurrence and radiation‐induced necrosis.

Update on Chemotherapeutic Approaches and Management of Bevacizumab Usage for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, has one of the most dismal prognoses in cancer. In 2009, bevacizumab was approved for recurrent glioblastoma in the USA. To evaluate the clinical impact of bevacizumab as a first-line drug for glioblastoma, two randomized clinical trials, AVAglio and RTOG 0825, were performed. Bevacizumab was found to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and was reported to be beneficial for maintaining patient performance status as an initial treatment. These outcomes led to bevacizumab approval in Japan in 2013 as an insurance-covered first-line drug for glioblastoma concurrently with its second-line application. However, prolongation of overall survival was not evinced in these clinical trials; hence, the clinical benefit of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastomas remains controversial. A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of bevacizumab combined with temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma also showed an effect only on PFS, and the benefit of bevacizumab even for recurrent glioblastoma is controversial. Here, we discuss the clinical impact of bevacizumab for glioblastoma treatment by reviewing previous clinical trials and real-world evidence by focusing on Japanese experiences. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab are summarized, and we provide suggestions for updating the approaches and management of bevacizumab.

Treatment-induced brain tissue necrosis: a clinical challenge in neuro-oncology

Cancer therapy-induced adverse effects on the brain are a major challenge in neuro-oncology. Brain tissue necrosis (treatment necrosis [TN]) as a consequence of brain directed cancer therapy remains an insufficiently characterized condition with diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties and is frequently associated with significant patient morbidity. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms, improvement of diagnostic tools, development of preventive strategies, and implementation of evidence-based therapeutic practices are pivotal to improve patient management. In this comprehensive review, we address existing challenges associated with current TN-related clinical and research practices and highlight unanswered questions and areas in need of further research with the ultimate goal to improve management of patients affected by this important neuro-oncological condition.

Bevacizumab for pediatric radiation necrosis

Background

Radiation necrosis is a frequent complication occurring after the treatment of pediatric brain tumors; however, treatment options remain a challenge. Bevacizumab is an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody that has been shown in small adult cohorts to confer a benefit, specifically a reduction in steroid usage, but its use in children has not been well described.

Methods

We describe our experience with bevacizumab use for symptomatic radiation necrosis at 5 institutions including patients treated after both initial irradiation and reirradiation.

Results

We identified 26 patients treated with bevacizumab for symptomatic radiation necrosis, with a wide range of underlying diagnoses. The average age at diagnosis of radiation necrosis was 10.7 years, with a median time between the last dose of radiation and the presentation of radiation necrosis of 3.8 months (range, 0.6-110 months). Overall, we observed that 13 of 26 patients (50%) had an objective clinical improvement, with only 1 patient suffering from significant hypertension. Radiological improvement, defined as reduced T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery signal and mass effect, was observed in 50% of patients; however, this did not completely overlap with clinical response. Both early and late radiation necrosis responded equally well to bevacizumab therapy. Overall, bevacizumab was very well tolerated, permitting a reduction of corticosteroid dose and/or duration in the majority of patients.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab appears to be effective and well-tolerated in children as treatment for symptomatic radiation necrosis and warrants more robust study in the context of controlled clinical trials.

Linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with a micro-multileaf collimator for large brain metastasis unsuitable for surgical resection

The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes using linac-based, fractionated, stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) with a micro-multileaf collimator for large brain metastasis (LBM) unsuitable for surgical resection. Between January 2009 and October 2018 we treated 21 patients with LBM using linac-based fSRT. LBM was defined as a tumor with ≥30 mm maximal diameter in gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance images. LBMs originated from the lung (n = 17, 81%), ovary (n = 2, 9.5%), rectum (n = 1, 4.8%) and esophagus (n = 1, 4.8%). The median pretreatment Karnofsky performance status was 50 (range: 50-80). Recursive partition analysis (RPA) was as follows: Classes 2 and 3 were 7 and 14 patients, respectively. The median follow-up was 5 months (range: 1-86 months). The range of tumor volume was 8.7-26.5 cm3 (median: 17.1 cm3). All patients were basically treated with 35Gy in 5 fractions, except in three cases. The progression-free survival was 3.0 months. The median survival time was 7.0 months. There was no permanent radiation injury in any of the patients. Radiation-caused central nervous system necrosis, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0, occurred in one patient (grade 3). One patients received bevacizumab for radiation necrosis. Two patients underwent additional surgical resection due to local progression and cyst formation. For patients with LBM unsuitable for surgical resection, linac-based fSRT is a promising therapeutic alternative.

Bevacizumab as a treatment option for radiation necrosis after cranial radiation therapy: a retrospective monocentric analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiation necrosis is a possible adverse event after cranial radiation therapy and can cause severe symptoms, such as an increased intracranial pressure or neurological deterioration. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab (BEV) has been shown to be a feasible therapeutic option for symptomatic radiation necrosis, either when traditional antiedematous steroid treatment fails, or as an alternative to steroid treatment. However, to the best of our knowledge, only one randomized study with a rather small cohort exists to prove a beneficial effect in this setting. Therefore, further real-life data are needed. This retrospective monocentric case study evaluates patients who received BEV due to radiation necrosis, with a specific focus on the respective clinical course.

METHODS

Using the internal database for pharmaceutical products, all patients who received BEV in our department were identified. Only patients who received BEV as symptomatic treatment for radiation necrosis were included. Patient characteristics, symptoms before, during, and after treatment, and the use of dexamethasone were evaluated using medical reports and systematic internal documentation. The symptoms were graded using CTCAE version 5.0 for general neurological symptoms. Symptoms were graded directly before each cycle and after the treatment (approximately 6 weeks). Additionally, the daily steroid dose was collected at these timepoints. Patients who either improved in symptoms, received less dexamethasone after treatment, or both were considered to have a benefit from the treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients who received BEV due to radiation necrosis were identified. For 10 patients (47.6%) symptoms improved and 11 patients (52.4%) remained clinically stable during the treatment. In 14 patients (66.7%) the dexamethasone dose could be reduced during therapy, 5 patients (23.8%) received the same dose of dexamethasone before and after the treatment, and 2 patients (9.5%) received a higher dose at the end of the treatment. According to this analysis, overall, 19 patients (90.5%) benefited from the treatment with BEV. No severe adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSION

BEV might be an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with radiation necrosis as a complication after cranial radiation therapy. Patients seem to benefit from this treatment by improving symptomatically or through reduction of dexamethasone.

Effect of bevacizumab on brain radiation necrosis in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung cancer

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer often results in failure of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Patients with uncontrolled CNS metastases receive radiation therapy, which sometimes causes brain radiation necrosis. We added bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, every 3-4 weeks) to the regimen of four ALK-positive lung cancer patients with brain radiation necrosis who were receiving ALK-TKI therapy. A decrease in brain radiation necrosis was seen in all the patients, and an improvement in symptoms was seen in three patients. In one patient who was receiving corticosteroid therapy, we could taper the dose and subsequently discontinue it. While one patient discontinued bevacizumab because of adverse events, the other three continued with the treatment. Therefore, the combination of bevacizumab with ALK-TKI seems to be an effective, manageable, and tolerable treatment for brain radiation necrosis.

Radiological diagnosis of brain radiation necrosis after cranial irradiation for brain tumor: a systematic review

Introduction

This systematic review aims to elucidate the diagnostic accuracy of radiological examinations to distinguish between brain radiation necrosis (BRN) and tumor progression (TP).

Methods

We divided diagnostic approaches into two categories as follows—conventional radiological imaging [computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): review question (RQ) 1] and nuclear medicine studies [single photon emission CT (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET): RQ2]—and queried. Our librarians conducted a comprehensive systematic search on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Japan Medical Abstracts Society up to March 2015. We estimated summary statistics using the bivariate random effects model and performed subanalysis by dividing into tumor types—gliomas and metastatic brain tumors.

Results

Of 188 and 239 records extracted from the database, we included 20 and 26 studies in the analysis for RQ1 and RQ2, respectively. In RQ1, we used gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted image, MR spectroscopy, and perfusion CT/MRI to diagnose BRN in RQ1. In RQ2, ²⁰¹Tl-, ^99mTc-MIBI-, and ^99mTc-GHA-SPECT, and ¹⁸F-FDG-, ¹¹C-MET-, ¹⁸F-FET-, and ¹⁸F-BPA-PET were used. In meta-analysis, Gd-enhanced MRI exhibited the lowest sensitivity [63%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 28–89%] and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and combined multiple imaging studies displayed the highest sensitivity (96%; 95% CI: 83–99%) and DOR among all imaging studies. In subanalysis for gliomas, Gd-enhanced MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET revealed low DOR. Conversely, we observed no difference in DOR among radiological imaging in metastatic brain tumors. However, diagnostic parameters and study subjects often differed among the same imaging studies. All studies enrolled a small number of patients, and only 10 were prospective studies without randomization.

Conclusions

Differentiating BRN from TP using Gd-enhanced MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET is challenging for patients with glioma. Conversely, BRN could be diagnosed by any radiological imaging in metastatic brain tumors. This review suggests that combined multiparametric imaging, including lesional metabolism and blood flow, could enhance diagnostic accuracy, compared with a single imaging study. Nevertheless, a substantial risk of bias and indirectness of reviewed studies hindered drawing firm conclusion about the best imaging technique for diagnosing BRN.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1228-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

An Acquired Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor T790M Mutation after the Addition of Bevacizumab to Preceding Erlotinib Monotherapy in a Lung Cancer Patient with Leptomeningeal Metastases

A 53-year-old man with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion received erlotinib. After 12 months of disease control with erlotinib monotherapy, leptomeningeal metastases (LM) occurred. A cerebrospinal fluid examination demonstrated a pre-existing EGFR exon 19 deletion. Bevacizumab was combined with erlotinib, and the LM improved. After six months of combination therapy, however, the LM was exacerbated. A re-examination of the cerebrospinal fluid revealed a T790M mutation and exon 19 deletion. Osimertinib was administered, and the LM improved. The combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib was effective for erlotinib-resistant LM and resulted in the expression of a newly acquired T790M mutation, which enabled successful treatment with osimertinib.

Boron Neutron Capture Therapy Combined with Early Successive Bevacizumab Treatments for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas - A Pilot Study

Recurrent malignant gliomas (RMGs) are difficult to control, and no standard protocol has been established for their treatment. At our institute, we have often treated RMGs by tumor-selective particle radiation called boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). However, despite the cell-selectivity of BNCT, brain radiation necrosis (BRN) may develop and cause severe neurological complications and sometimes death. This is partly due to the full-dose X-ray treatments usually given earlier in the treatment course. To overcome BRN following BNCT, recent studies have used bevacizumab (BV). We herein used extended BV treatment beginning just after BNCT to confer protection against or ameliorate BRN, and evaluated; the feasibility, efficacy, and BRN control of this combination treatment. Seven patients with RMGs (grade 3 and 4 cases) were treated with BNCT between June 2013 and May 2014, followed by successive BV treatments. They were followed-up to December 2017. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after combination treatment were 15.1 and 5.4 months, respectively. In one case, uncontrollable brain edema occurred and ultimately led to death after BV was interrupted due to meningitis. In two other cases, symptomatic aggravation of BRN occurred after interruption of BV treatment. No BRN was observed during the observation period in the other cases. Common terminology criteria for adverse events grade 2 and 3 proteinuria occurred in two cases and necessitated the interruption of BV treatments. Boron neutron capture therapy followed by BV treatments well-prevented or well-controlled BRN with prolonged OS and acceptable incidence of adverse events in our patients with RMG.

Focal radiation necrosis of the brain in patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with pembrolizumab

Introduction

Up to 60% of patients with metastatic melanoma develop melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) during the course of their disease. Surgery, radiosurgery (SRS), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), and whole‐brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or combinations of these are commonly used local treatment modalities. Inhibitory monoclonal antibodies against the CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 immune checkpoint receptors significantly improved the survival of metastatic melanoma patients, including patients with MBM. This prolonged survival, and potentially also the immunostimulatory mechanisms, may expose patients to a higher risk for long‐term complications such as focal postradiation necrosis of the brain (RNB).

Methods

We analyzed the incidence of pseudotumoral RNB in a single institution cohort of 142 melanoma patients that were prospectively followed after starting treatment with pembrolizumab in an expanded access program.

Results

Of the 142 patients, 43 (30.7%) patients had MBM at initiation pembrolizumab. Of these, 31 (72.1%) were treated with SRS, 8 (18.6%) with WBRT while 4 (9.3%) had no prior local therapy. Of patients treated with RT, 28 (71.1%) received RT before the initiation of pembrolizumab. 5 (12.8%) patients developed a new symptomatic pseudotumoral lesion at a median time of 11.15 months (range 8‐46) after the RT. In all patients, the diagnosis of RNB was radiologically confirmed. The RNB was treated with corticosteroids in two patients, bevacizumab in two patients, and surgery in three symptomatic patients. The diagnosis was histologically confirmed in the patients treated with surgery.

Conclusion

Melanoma patients with MBM treated with radiosurgery and showing a beneficial response to pembrolizumab are at risk for late RNB. In case of suspected isolated progression at the site of a previously irradiated MBM, the diagnosis of RNB should be considered.

Usefulness of 11C-Methionine Positron Emission Tomography for Monitoring of Treatment Response and Recurrence in a Glioblastoma Patient on Bevacizumab Therapy: A Case Report

Recently developed molecular targeted therapies such as bevacizumab (BEV; Avastin) therapy have therapeutic efficacy for glioblastoma. However, it is difficult to distinguish between a tumor response and nonenhancing tumor progression with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after BEV administration. Here we present a recurrent glioblastoma case in which ¹¹C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) provided useful information for detecting tumor recurrence after complete remission, as assessed by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. A 47-year-old male with a left frontal lobe glioblastoma experienced recurrence 6 months postoperatively. We administered BEV concomitantly with temozolomide, subsequent to gamma knife surgery. Two months after starting BEV, complete remission was obtained. MET uptake on PET gradually decreased and had nearly disappeared 4 months after initiating BEV. No enhanced area was seen on MRI for 17 months after BEV initiation. Nevertheless, MET-PET revealed recurrence, visualized as nonenhancing tumor progression. MET-PET provides useful information for detecting glioblastoma recurrence, which lacks contrast enhancement on MRI after BEV therapy.

Interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Brain radionecrosis (tissue death caused by radiation) can occur following high-dose radiotherapy to brain tissue and can have a significant impact on a person's quality of life (QoL) and function. The underlying pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear for this condition, which makes establishing effective treatments challenging.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of interventions used for the treatment of brain radionecrosis in adults over 18 years old.

SEARCH METHODS

In October 2017, we searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for eligible studies. We also searched unpublished data through Physicians Data Query, www.controlled-trials.com/rct, www.clinicaltrials.gov, and www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials for ongoing trials and handsearched relevant conference material.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any intervention directed to treat brain radionecrosis in adults over 18 years old previously treated with radiation therapy to the brain. We anticipated a limited number of RCTs, so we also planned to include all comparative prospective intervention trials and quasi-randomised trials of interventions for brain radionecrosis in adults as long as these studies had a comparison group that reflects the standard of care (i.e. placebo or corticosteroids). Selection bias was likely to be an issue in all the included non-randomised studies therefore results are interpreted with caution.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (CC, PB) independently extracted data from selected studies and completed a 'Risk of bias' assessment. For dichotomous outcomes, the odds ratio (OR) for the outcome of interest was reported. For continuous outcomes, treatment effect was reported as mean difference (MD) between treatment arms with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

Two RCTs and one prospective non-randomised study evaluating pharmacological interventions met the inclusion criteria for this review. As each study evaluated a different drug or intervention using different endpoints, a meta-analysis was not possible. There were no trials of non-pharmacological interventions that met the inclusion criteria.A very small randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab versus placebo reported that 100% (7/7) of participants on bevacizumab had reduction in brain oedema by at least 25% and reduction in post-gadolinium enhancement, whereas all those receiving placebo had clinical or radiological worsening or both. This was an encouraging finding but due to the small sample size we did not report a relative effect. The authors also failed to provide adequate details regarding the randomisation and blinding procedures Therefore, the certainty of this evidence is low and a larger RCT adhering to reporting standards is needed.An open-label RCT demonstrated a greater reduction in brain oedema (T2 hyperintensity) in the edaravone plus corticosteroid group than in the corticosteroid alone group (MD was 3.03 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.92; low-certainty evidence due to high risk of bias and imprecision); although the result approached borderline significance, there was no evidence of any important difference in the reduction in post-gadolinium enhancement between arms (MD = 0.47, 95% CI - 0.80 to 1.74; low-certainty evidence due to high risk of bias and imprecision).In the RCT of bevacizumab versus placebo, all seven participants receiving bevacizumab were reported to have neurological improvement, whereas five of seven participants on placebo had neurological worsening (very low-certainty evidence due to small sample size and concerns over validity of analyses). While no adverse events were noted with placebo, three severe adverse events were noted with bevacizumab, which included aspiration pneumonia, pulmonary embolus and superior sagittal sinus thrombosis. In the RCT of corticosteroids with or without edaravone, the participants who received the combination treatment were noted to have significantly greater clinical improvement than corticosteroids alone based on LENT/SOMA scale (OR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.26 to 5.01; low-certainty evidence due to open-label design). No differences in treatment toxicities were observed between arms.One included prospective non-randomised study of alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E) versus no active treatment was found but it did not include any radiological assessment. As only one included study was a double-blinded randomised controlled trial, the other studies were prone to selection and detection biases.None of the included studies reported quality of life outcomes or adequately reported details about corticosteroid requirements.A limited number of prospective studies were identified but subsequently excluded as these studies had a limited number of participants evaluating different pharmacological interventions using variable endpoints.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of good certainty evidence to help quantify the risks and benefits of interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery. In an RCT of 14 patients, bevacizumab showed radiological response which was associated with minimal improvement in cognition or symptom severity. Although it was a randomised trial by design, the small sample size limits the quality of data. A trial of edaravone plus corticosteroids versus corticosteroids alone reported greater reduction in the surrounding oedema with combination treatment but no effect on the enhancing radionecrosis lesion. Due to the open-label design and wide confidence intervals in the results, the quality of this data was also low. There was no evidence to support any non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of radionecrosis. Further prospective randomised studies of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are needed to generate stronger evidence. Two ongoing RCTs, one evaluating bevacizumab and one evaluating hyperbaric oxygen therapy were identified.

Immunotherapy of Nivolumab with Dendritic Cell Vaccination Is Effective against Intractable Recurrent Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Case Report

We report effective treatment with nivolumab of a patient with recurrent primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) after multiple therapies. A 41-year-old woman with a right parietal PCNSL underwent treatment with high-dose methotrexate and radiotherapy. After recurrence in the left frontal lobe, the patient received several chemotherapies, including methotrexate and rituximab, and underwent surgery. The tumor was refractory to these treatments, and the patient then underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Multiple small, new recurrent tumors appeared in the right frontal lobe and the left frontoparietal region 2 months after IMRT. The patient received nivolumab 3 mg/kg with dendritic cell vaccination. Complete remission of the tumors was achieved after six cycles of nivolumab, and remission was maintained for 10 months after the initiation of nivolumab. Nivolumab could be a novel treatment for intractable recurrent PCNSL in the future.