1
|
Giles LA. Hyperlipidemia Prevention and Management Utilizing Lifestyle Changes. J Midwifery Womens Health 2024; 69:361-369. [PMID: 38678434 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2024]
Abstract
Hyperlipidemia incidence is on the rise and lifestyle behavior change is the first-line therapy. Left untreated, hyperlipidemia can result in cardiovascular disease leading to increased morbidity and mortality in persons worldwide. Evidence has demonstrated behavioral changes such as increased exercise, healthy nutrition, smoking cessation, alcohol abstinence, and other lifestyle modification interventions significantly decrease the incidence and severity of hyperlipidemia. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence of lifestyle interventions in preventing and managing hyperlipidemia and to suggest innovative ways to integrate those techniques into clinical practice. Recommendations on hyperlipidemia specific to pregnancy, polycystic ovary syndrome, and estrogen deficiency are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Amy Giles
- Louise Herrington School of Nursing, Baylor University, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prosser NS, Green MJ, Ferguson E, Tildesley MJ, Hill EM, Keeling MJ, Kaler J. Cattle farmer psychosocial profiles and their association with control strategies for bovine viral diarrhea. J Dairy Sci 2022; 105:3559-3573. [PMID: 35094853 PMCID: PMC9092459 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) is endemic in the United Kingdom and causes major economic losses. Control is largely voluntary for individual farmers and is likely to be influenced by psychosocial factors, such as altruism, trust, and psychological proximity (feeling close) to relevant “others,” such as farmers, veterinarians, the government, and their cows. These psychosocial factors (factors with both psychological and social aspects) are important determinants of how people make decisions related to their own health, many of which have not been studied in the context of infectious disease control by farmers. Farmer psychosocial profiles were investigated using multiple validated measures in an observational survey of 475 UK cattle farmers using the capability, opportunity, motivation-behavior (COM-B) framework. Farmers were clustered by their BVD control practices using latent class analysis. Farmers were split into 5 BVD control behavior classes, which were tested for associations with the psychosocial and COM-B factors using multinomial logistic regression, with doing nothing as the baseline class. Farmers who were controlling disease both for themselves and others were more likely to do something to control BVD (e.g., test, vaccinate). Farmers who did not trust other farmers, had high psychological capability (knowledge and understanding of how to control disease), and had high physical opportunity (time and money to control disease) were more likely to have a closed, separate herd and test. Farmers who did not trust other farmers were also more likely to undertake many prevention strategies with an open herd. Farmers with high automatic motivation (habits and emotions) and reflective motivation (decisions and goals) were more likely to vaccinate and test, alone or in combination with other controls. Farmers with high psychological proximity (feeling of closeness) to their veterinarian were more likely to undertake many prevention strategies in an open herd. Farmers with high psychological proximity to dairy farmers and low psychological proximity to beef farmers were more likely to keep their herd closed and separate and test or vaccinate and test. Farmers who had a lot of trust in other farmers and invested in them, rather than keeping everything for themselves, were more likely to be careful introducing new stock and test. In conclusion, farmer psychosocial factors were associated with strategies for BVD control in UK cattle farmers. Psychological proximity to veterinarians was a novel factor associated with proactive BVD control and was more important than the more extensively investigated trust. These findings highlight the importance of a close veterinarian-farmer relationship and are important for promoting effective BVD control by farmers, which has implications for successful nationwide BVD control and eradication schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N S Prosser
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom.
| | - M J Green
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - E Ferguson
- School of Psychology, University Park, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
| | - M J Tildesley
- Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology & Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom; Joint UNIversities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research (JUNIPER; https://maths.org/juniper/)
| | - E M Hill
- Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology & Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom; Joint UNIversities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research (JUNIPER; https://maths.org/juniper/)
| | - M J Keeling
- Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology & Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom; Joint UNIversities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research (JUNIPER; https://maths.org/juniper/)
| | - J Kaler
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gilligan C, Brubacher SP, Powell MB. "We're All Time Poor": Experienced Clinicians' and Students' Perceptions of Challenges Related to Patient Communication. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2022; 34:1-12. [PMID: 33789547 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1893175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PHENOMENON Communication is a complex and essential element of clinical practice. It is widely accepted that communication skills can be taught and learned, but challenges remain for clinicians in achieving effective communication with patients. This study explored the patient-communication challenges faced by both medical students and experienced clinicians. APPROACH Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty medical students and nineteen experienced clinicians from a range of medical disciplines. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and transcriptions subjected to thematic analysis and coding to quantify the challenges discussed. FINDINGS There was remarkable consistency in the challenges described by both groups of participants, with eight predominant challenges identified: time constraints and chaotic environments, rapport building, patient characteristics, reluctance, omissions, assumptions, decision-making, and keeping conversations focused. INSIGHTS Medical curricula often focus on communication challenges associated with complex or sensitive clinical situations, but many of the challenges identified occur in routine consultations. Both pre-service and post-graduate medical training should adopt strategies to help build students' and clinicians' skills in managing these challenges from the outset of training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor Gilligan
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sonja P Brubacher
- Centre for Investigative Interviewing, Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Martine B Powell
- Centre for Investigative Interviewing, Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kastaun S, Leve V, Hildebrandt J, Funke C, Klosterhalfen S, Lubisch D, Reddemann O, McRobbie H, Raupach T, West R, Wilm S, Viechtbauer W, Kotz D. Training general practitioners in the ABC versus 5As method of delivering stop-smoking advice: a pragmatic, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7:00621-2020. [PMID: 34322552 PMCID: PMC8311138 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00621-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
This study assessed the effectiveness of a 3.5-h training session for general practitioners (GPs) in providing brief stop-smoking advice and compared two methods of giving advice - ABC versus 5As - on the rates of delivery of such advice and of recommendations of evidence-based smoking cessation treatment during routine consultations. A pragmatic, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial was carried out including a pre-/post-design for the analyses of the primary outcome in 52 GP practices in Germany. Practices were randomised (1:1) to receive a 3.5-h training session (ABC or 5As). In total, 1937 tobacco-smoking patients, who consulted trained GPs in these practices in the 6 weeks prior to or following the training, were included. The primary outcome was patient-reported rates of GP-delivered stop-smoking advice prior to and following the training, irrespective of the training method. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported receipt of recommendation/prescription of behavioural therapy, pharmacotherapy or combination therapy for smoking cessation, and the effectiveness of ABC versus 5As regarding all outcomes. GP-delivered stop-smoking advice increased from 13.1% (n=136 out of 1039) to 33.1% (n=297 out of 898) following the training (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.25, 95% CI 2.34-4.51). Recommendation/prescription rates of evidence-based treatments were low (<2%) pre-training, but had all increased after training (e.g. behavioural support: aOR 7.15, 95% CI 4.02-12.74). Delivery of stop-smoking advice increased non-significantly (p=0.08) stronger in the ABC versus 5As group (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 0.94-3.12). A single training session in stop-smoking advice was associated with a three-fold increase in rates of advice giving and a seven-fold increase in offer of support. The ABC method may lead to higher rates of GP-delivered advice during routine consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Kastaun
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Verena Leve
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jaqueline Hildebrandt
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Christian Funke
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stephanie Klosterhalfen
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diana Lubisch
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Olaf Reddemann
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hayden McRobbie
- University of New South Wales, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Randwick, Australia.,Lakes District Health Board, Rotorua, New Zealand
| | - Tobias Raupach
- Dept of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.,Behavioral Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert West
- Behavioral Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stefan Wilm
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Viechtbauer
- Dept of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Kotz
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.,Behavioral Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.,Dept of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kastaun S, Viechtbauer W, Leve V, Hildebrandt J, Funke C, Klosterhalfen S, Lubisch D, Reddemann O, Raupach T, Wilm S, Kotz D. Quit attempts and tobacco abstinence in primary care patients: follow-up of a pragmatic, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial on brief stop-smoking advice - ABC versus 5As. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7:00224-2021. [PMID: 34322551 PMCID: PMC8311137 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00224-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
We developed a 3.5-h training for general practitioners (GPs) in delivering brief stop-smoking advice according to different methods (ABC, 5As). In a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial our training proved effective in increasing GP-delivered rates of such advice (from 13% to 33%). In this follow-up analysis we examined the effect of the training and compared ABC versus 5As on patient-reported quit attempts and point prevalence abstinence at weeks 4, 12 and 26 following GP consultation. Follow-up data were collected in 1937 smoking patients - independently of the receipt of GP advice - recruited before or after the training of 69 GPs. At week 26, ∼70% of the patients were lost to follow-up. All 1937 patients were included in an intention-to-treat analysis; missing outcome data were imputed. Quit attempts and abstinence rates did not differ significantly from pre- to post-training or between patients from the ABC versus the 5As group. However, ancillary analyses showed that patients who received GP advice compared to those who did not had two times higher odds of reporting a quit attempt at all follow-ups and abstinence at week 26. We reported that our training increases GP-delivered rates of stop-smoking advice, and the present analysis confirms that advice is associated with increased quit attempts and abstinence rates in patients. However, our training did not further improve these rates, which might be related to patients' loss to follow-up or to contextual factors, e.g. access to free evidence-based cessation treatment, which can hamper the transfer of GPs' advice into patients' behaviour change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Kastaun
- Institute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Viechtbauer
- Dept of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Verena Leve
- Institute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jaqueline Hildebrandt
- Institute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Christian Funke
- Institute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stephanie Klosterhalfen
- Institute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diana Lubisch
- Institute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Olaf Reddemann
- Institute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tobias Raupach
- Institute for Medical Education, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Behavioral Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stefan Wilm
- Institute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Daniel Kotz
- Institute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Behavioral Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
- Dept of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheung YTD, Jiang N, Jiang CQ, Zhuang RS, Gao WH, Zhou J, Lu JH, Li H, Wang JF, Lai YS, Sun JS, Wu JC, Ye C, Li N, Zhou G, Chen JY, Ou XY, Liu LQ, Huang ZH, Ho SY, Li HCW, Su SH, Yang Y, Jiang Y, Zhu WH, Yang L, Lin P, He Y, Cheng KK, Lam TH. Physicians' very brief (30-sec) intervention for smoking cessation on 13 671 smokers in China: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Addiction 2021; 116:1172-1185. [PMID: 32918512 PMCID: PMC8246886 DOI: 10.1111/add.15262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Three to 10 minutes of smoking cessation advice by physicians is effective to increase quit rates, but is not routinely practised. We examined the effectiveness of physicians' very brief (approximately 30 sec) smoking cessation intervention on quit rates among Chinese outpatient smokers. DESIGN A pragmatic, open-label, individually randomized controlled trial. SETTING Seventy-two medical outpatient departments of hospitals and/or community health centers in Guangdong, China. PARTICIPANTS Chinese adults who were daily cigarette smokers (n = 13 671, 99% males) were invited by their physician to participate during outpatient consultation. Smokers who were receiving smoking cessation treatment or were judged to need specialist treatment for cessation were excluded. INTERVENTIONS The intervention group (n = 7015) received a 30-sec intervention including physician's very brief advice, a leaflet with graphic warnings and a card with contact information of available cessation services. The control group (n = 6656) received a very brief intervention on consuming vegetables and fruit. A total of 3466 participants in the intervention group were further randomized to receive a brief booster advice from trained study personnel via telephone 1 month following their doctor visit. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) in the intervention and control groups at the 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included self-reported 30-day abstinence and biochemically validated abstinence at 12-month follow-up. FINDINGS By intention-to-treat, the intervention (versus control) group had greater self-reported 7-day abstinence [9.1 versus 7.8%, odds ratio (OR) = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.26, P = 0.008] and 30-day abstinence (8.0 versus 6.9%, OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03-1.27, P = 0.01) at 12-month follow-up. The effect size increased when only participants who received the intervention from compliant physicians were included (7-day PPA, OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.11-1.74). The group difference in biochemically validated abstinence was small (0.8 versus 0.8%, OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.71-1.42, P = 0.99). CONCLUSION A 30-sec smoking cessation intervention increased self-reported abstinence among mainly male smokers in China at 12-month follow-up (risk difference = 1.3%), and should be feasible to provide in most settings and delivered by all health-care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nan Jiang
- Department of Population Health, Grossman School of MedicineNew York UniversityNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Run Sen Zhuang
- Shenzhen Health Education and Promotion CentreShenzhenChina
| | - Wen Hui Gao
- Shenzhen Health Education and Promotion CentreShenzhenChina
| | - Jian Zhou
- Department of Respiratory MedicineGuangzhou Medical University Second Affiliated HospitalGuangzhouChina
| | - Jin Hong Lu
- Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of HuangpuGuangzhouChina
| | - Hui Li
- Shenzhen Bao'an District Songgang People's Hospital, Hongqiaotou Community Health Service CenterShenzhenChina
| | - Jun Feng Wang
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen University, ZhongshangChina
| | - Yi Sheng Lai
- Shenzhen Longgang District Central HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Jun Sheng Sun
- Shenzhen Longgang District Central HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Jiu Chang Wu
- Shenzhen Bao'an District Fuyong HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Chiang Ye
- Division of EndocrinologyShenzhen Bao'an District People's HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Na Li
- Shenzhen Longgang District Central HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Gang Zhou
- Guangzhou No. 12 HospitalGuangzhou Guangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Jing Ying Chen
- Shenzhen Longgang District Second People's HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Xiu Yan Ou
- ZhongShan City People's Hospital, ZhongShanChina
| | - Liu Qing Liu
- Longhua District People's Hospital Yansong Community CenterShenzhenChina
| | - Zhuang Hong Huang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College Guan Bu Zhai Mei Healthcare StationShantouChina
| | - Sai Yin Ho
- School of Public HealthThe University of Hong KongHong Kong, China
| | | | - Sheng Hua Su
- Health Care Center for Cadre of Guangdong ProvinceGuangzhouChina
| | - Yan Yang
- Tobacco Control Office, Chinese Center for Disease Control and PreventionChina
| | - Yuan Jiang
- Tobacco Control Office, Chinese Center for Disease Control and PreventionChina
| | - Wei Hua Zhu
- Guangzhou No. 12 HospitalGuangzhou Guangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Lie Yang
- Guangzhou No. 12 HospitalGuangzhou Guangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Peiru Lin
- Guangzhou First Municipal People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Yao He
- Institute of Geriatrics, Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Kar Keung Cheng
- Institute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamUK
| | - Tai Hing Lam
- School of Public HealthThe University of Hong KongHong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kastaun S, Leve V, Hildebrandt J, Funke C, Becker S, Lubisch D, Viechtbauer W, Reddemann O, Hempel L, McRobbie H, Raupach T, West R, Kotz D. Effectiveness of training general practitioners to improve the implementation of brief stop-smoking advice in German primary care: study protocol of a pragmatic, 2-arm cluster randomised controlled trial (the ABCII trial). BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2019; 20:107. [PMID: 31351460 PMCID: PMC6660716 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-0986-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background The German clinical guideline on tobacco addiction recommends that general practitioners (GPs) provide brief stop-smoking advice to their patients according to the “5A” or the much briefer “ABC” method, but its implementation is insufficient. A lack of training is one barrier for GPs to provide such advice. Moreover, the respective effectiveness of a 5A or ABC training regarding subsequent delivery of stop-smoking advice has not been investigated. We developed a training for GPs according to both methods, and conducted a pilot study with process evaluation to optimize the trainings according to the needs of GPs. This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of both trainings. Methods A pragmatic 2-arm cluster randomised controlled trial with a pre-post data collection will be conducted in 48 GP practices in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany). GPs will be randomised to receive a 3.5-h-training in delivering either 5A or ABC, including peer coaching and intensive role plays with professional actors. The patient-reported primary outcome (receipt of GP advice to quit: yes/no) and secondary outcomes (recommendation rates of smoking cessation treatments, group comparison (5A versus ABC): receipt of GP advice to quit) will be collected in smoking patients routinely consulting their GP within 4 weeks prior, and 4 weeks following the training. Additional secondary outcomes will be collected at 4, 12 and 26 weeks following the consultation: use of cessation treatments during the last quit attempt (if so) since the GP consultation, and point-prevalence abstinence rates. The primary data analysis will be conducted using a mixed-effects logistic regression model with random effects for the cluster variable. Discussion If the training increases the rates of delivery of stop-smoking advice, it would offer a low-threshold strategy for the guideline implementation in German primary care. Should one method prove superior, a more specific guideline recommendation can be proposed. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012786); registered on 22th August 2017, prior to the first patient in. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0986-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Kastaun
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Verena Leve
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jaqueline Hildebrandt
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Christian Funke
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stephanie Becker
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diana Lubisch
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Viechtbauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Olaf Reddemann
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Linn Hempel
- Clinical Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hayden McRobbie
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,The Dragon Institute for Innovation, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Tobias Raupach
- Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.,Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert West
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Kotz
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.,Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|