Endovascular Treatment of Large and Giant Carotid Aneurysms with Flow-Diverter Stents Alone or in Combination with Coils: A Multicenter Experience and Long-Term Follow-up

Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Coiling in Pipeline Embolization Device Implantation for Small- and Medium-Sized Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The pipeline embolization device with adjunctive coiling (PAC) for small- and medium-sized unruptured cerebral aneurysms (UCAs) has not yet been fully evaluated for promoting aneurysm occlusion and preventing delayed rupture. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of the PAC for UCAs ≤10 mm in diameter.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive UCAs (50 patients) ≤10 mm in diameter that underwent flow diversion with a single pipeline embolization device (PED) at three institutions between January 2019 and January 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into PAC- (n = 23) and PED-alone (n = 27) groups. Data were compared regarding embolization results and complications.

RESULTS

Aneurysms with bleb formation, medium-sized aneurysms (7-10 mm), and those treated via transfemoral access were significantly more frequently managed with PAC than PED alone. In the PAC group, Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification scores immediately after treatment were class 1 in 1 case (4.3%) and class 3 in 22 cases (96%), with a mean volume embolization ratio of 20.6%. The PAC group had a significantly longer procedure time (184 vs. 117 minutes, P < 0.001) but showed no differences in ischemic or hemorrhagic complications, access site complications, or in-stent stenosis. Complete occlusion was significantly higher in the PAC group at 6 months (100% vs. 67%, P = 0.002) and 1 year (100% vs. 74%, P = 0.011). No delayed complications, including ischemic events, aneurysm rupture, or death, were observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

PAC for UCAs ≤10 mm in diameter may enhance the rate of complete occlusion without increasing the risk of complications.

Intraoperative aneurysm flow analysis predicts intracranial large and giant aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion

OBJECTIVES

Incompletely occluded flow-diverter (FD)-treated aneurysms are at risk of rupture and thromboembolic complications; however, intraoperative prediction of FD treatment outcomes has not yet been established. In this study, we investigated the association between intraoperative aneurysm flow analysis, using optical flow imaging, and FD treatment outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with large unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms (≥ 10 mm) who underwent FD treatment. During the procedure, a flow analysis method using optical flow digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was used to measure the flow within the aneurysm sac by calculating the mean aneurysm flow amplitude (MAFA) before and after stent deployment. Occlusion was assessed using the O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading scale on DSA 12 months after FD. The patients were divided into a nearly complete occlusion group (OKM grades C and D) and an incomplete occlusion group (OKM grades A and B).

RESULTS

Eleven patients with 11 aneurysms (mean age, 67.5 [standard deviation, 8.3] years; 10 women, 88.9 %) were treated with FD. Nearly complete occlusion was observed in 6/11 (54.5 %) patients at 12-month follow-up imaging. The nearly complete occlusion group had significantly lower pre-MAFA and post-MAFA values than the incomplete occlusion group (P = 0.023 and P = 0.008, respectively). There was no difference in the MAFA ratio between the two groups (P = 0.315) CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm flow analysis before and after FD deployment is a simple and beneficial approach to predict treatment outcomes, which would indicate the need for intraoperative strategy changes, such as adding FD layers or intrasaccular coils.

Clinical Outcome of Pipeline Embolization Device with and without Coils to Treat Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of a Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) in combination with coils (PEDC) to treat intracranial aneurysms remains unclear as to whether it offers significant benefits for the patients because the results have varied.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcome of the PEDC compared with the PED in treating intracranial aneurysms.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched the articles from PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases published before January 25, 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

We selected studies comparing the PEDC versus the PED to treat intracranial aneurysms. Patients treated with the PEDC but using dense coiling were excluded from the study.

DATA ANALYSIS

The clinical outcomes observed in this meta-analysis were intraprocedural complications, postoperative complications (stenosis, stroke, hemorrhage, mortality), favorable outcome (mRS ≤2), complete occlusion rate, and retreatment rate. A forest plot was used to analyze pooled OR of clinical outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 3001 subjects from 9 observational studies were included. The PEDC was mainly used to treat larger aneurysms. The PEDC has a significantly higher complete occlusion rate at 6 months (OR = 2.66; 95% CI, 1.26-115.59; P = .01), a lower retreatment rate (OR = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05-0.07; P = .010), higher stroke-related complications (OR= 1.66, 95% CI, 1.16-2.37; P = .005), and higher hemorrhage-related complications (OR = 1.98; 95% CI, 1.22-13.21; P = .005). There was no significant difference in intraprocedural complications, stenosis-related complications, mortality, favorable outcomes, and complete occlusion at the end of the study.

LIMITATIONS

No randomized controlled trials have been performed comparing the PEDC and PED. Considering that all the included studies were observational, the patients' baseline characteristics were not completely balanced.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis study showed that the PEDC in large intracranial aneurysms induces a faster complete occlusion rate at 6 months and a lower retreatment rate. However, it increases the risk of stroke-related postoperative complications, and the faster complete aneurysm occlusion rate found in this study did not correlate with a reduction in long-term aneurysm or distal artery ruptures. Thus, this study suggests the need to find a better strategy to improve long-term hemorrhage-related complications in large intracranial aneurysms.

Comparison of flow diverter alone versus flow diverter with coiling for large and giant intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Large and giant intracranial aneurysms pose treatment challenges. The benefit-risk balance of flow diverters (FDs) alone versus FDs with coiling remains unclear. This study aimed to compare these two strategies.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science was performed up to October 2024. Studies comparing FDs with or without adjunctive coiling in large/giant intracranial aneurysms were included. The primary outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion, defined by the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification. Additional outcomes included procedural and postprocedural complications. Data were analyzed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

15 studies with 1130 patients were analyzed, with 557 in the FD alone group and 573 in the FD+coiling group. The meta-analysis revealed that FD+coiling significantly improved complete aneurysm occlusion rates (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.40, P=0.03). While overall ischemic complications were significantly lower in the FD alone group, a sensitivity analysis showed no significant difference (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.23, P=0.13). Subgroup analysis of fusiform aneurysms showed no significant difference in complete aneurysm occlusion rates (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.40, P=0.82). Procedural and hemorrhagic complications did not differ significantly, and no publication bias was detected in the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining FDs with coiling improved complete aneurysm occlusion rates in large and giant saccular intracranial aneurysms, although the impact on complications remains controversial. Further investigation into the benefit-risk ratio of this combined approach is warranted.

Exploring the latest findings on endovascular treatments for giant aneurysms: a review

Giant intracranial aneurysms represent a very challenging aspect of aneurysmal pathophysiology with very high mortality and morbidity if left untreated. Their variety in clinical presentation (subarachnoid hemorrhage, cranial nerve palsy, etc.) and pathological and imaging properties (location, anatomy, presence of collateral circulation) pose serious questions regarding the best treatment option. Admirable advances have been achieved in surgical techniques, while endovascular modalities with flow diversion techniques have become widely used. However, there is still lack of data regarding whether a single endovascular technique can be the universal treatment for such cases. In this review, we aim to summarize the current funds of knowledge concerning giant intracranial aneurysms and the role of endovascular management in their treatment.

Microsurgical and endovascular treatment of large and giant aneurysms of the anterior circulation: A systematic review

Introduction

Large and Giant intracranial aneurysms (LGIAs) have become the paradigm for which endovascular techniques do not provide satisfactory results. Yet, microsurgery is followed by non-negligible rates of morbimortality. This scenario may have changed since the introduction of flow-diversion devices.

Research question

Contemporary and standardised revision on microsurgical and endovascular results, with emphasis on anterior circulation LGIAs.

Materials and methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in two databases (PubMed and Embase) on treatment outcomes of LGIAs of the anterior circulation, after the introduction of flow-diverters 2008/01/01, till 2023/05/20. Small case series (<5 cases), series including >15% of posterior circulation aneurysms, and studies not reporting clinical and/or angiographic outcomes were excluded.

Results

44 relevant studies (observational cohorts) were identified, including 2923 LGIAs predominantly from anterior circulation. Mean follow-up 22 (±20) months. 1494 (51%) LGIAs were treated endovascularly and 1427 (49%) microsurgically. According to the random effects model, pooled rates of favourable clinical outcomes were 85.8% (CI 95% 82.6-88.4), complete occlusion 69.4% (CI 95% 63.7-7.46), complications 19.6% (CI 95%16-23.9) and mortality 5.6% (CI 95% 4.4-7.1). Focusing on type of treatment, occlusion rates are higher with microsurgical (842/993, 85% vs 874/1,299, 67%), although good outcomes are slightly more frequent with endovascular (1045/1,135, 92% vs 1120/1,294, 87%).

Discussion and conclusions

According to contemporary data about occlusion rates, functional outcomes, and complications, primary or secondary treatment of LGIAs of the anterior circulation seems justified. Microsurgical occlusion rates are higher in LGIAs. An expert consensus on reporting complications and management strategies is warranted.

Treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverting stent: Long-term results from the International Retrospective Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device (IntrePED) study

BACKGROUND

Traditional endovascular treatments of giant intracranial aneurysms are associated with high rates of complications and retreatment. Our objective was to examine the safety and long-term efficacy of the Pipeline Embolization Device for treatment of these aneurysms.

METHODS

This retrospective study using the IntrePED database included all patients with giant intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline device between July 2008 and February 2013. Efficacy outcomes were stratified by using the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification. Predefined safety outcomes included spontaneous rupture of the target aneurysm; ipsilateral intracranial hemorrhage; ischemic stroke; parent artery stenosis; and sustained cranial neuropathy.

RESULTS

Sixty-six embolizations were performed to treat 63 giant intracranial aneurysms (including 2 ruptured): 49 (77.8%) in the anterior and 14 (22.2%) in the posterior circulation. The median follow-up was 22.4 (0.1-60.5) months. Class I angiographic occlusion was achieved in 72.0% (36/50). The neurological morbidity/mortality rate was 23.8% (15/63), with higher rates in the posterior circulation than in the anterior circulation (22.4% vs. 28.6%). Among seven deaths, five had neurological causes. The procedure-related neurological morbidity and mortality rates were 22.7% (15/66) and 7.6% (5/66), respectively. The spontaneous rupture rate was 4.5% (3/66). Two spontaneous ruptures (1 death), 4/4 postprocedural intracranial hemorrhages, and 6/9 ischemic events occurred within 30 days. In-stent stenosis and new-onset cranial neuropathy were not observed during the angiographic follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Although procedure-related neurological morbidity/mortality rates were not insignificant, this study confirms the feasibility and long-term efficacy of the Pipeline Embolization Device to treat giant intracranial aneurysms.

Evaluation of the Significance of Persistent Remnant Filling and Enlargement After Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical course after flow diversion (FD) treatment with a focus on aneurysms with remnant sac filling, by analyzing angiographic outcomes, aneurysm volume, and clinical events.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 61 patients who underwent FD for intracranial aneurysms between July 2014 and June 2021.

RESULTS

The majority of aneurysms (52.5%) were located in the internal carotid artery, with a median diameter of 16.6 mm and neck size of 9.3 mm. Remnant filling was observed in 17 aneurysms (27.9%) more than 18 months after FD, 10 (16.4%) of these aneurysms underwent enlargement, which occurred only in cases with subtotal filling or entry remnant states. Eleven patients experienced major adverse events, and three exhibited unfavorable functional outcomes. The incidence of major adverse events and unfavorable functional outcomes was significantly higher in the aneurysm enlargement group than that in the no-filling or stable remnant filling groups (P < 0.001). Aneurysmal diameter and the presence of incorporated branches were independent predictors of aneurysm enlargement, while the presence of incorporated branches was the only independent predictor of persistent remnant filling.

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysm enlargement after FD is not uncommon, particularly when the aneurysm is large, has incorporated vessels, or does not undergo occlusion within 12 months, often culminating in major adverse events and unfavorable functional outcomes. In addition to investigating angiographic results, it is necessary to evaluate the changes in aneurysm size and clinical events when assessing the efficacy of FD.

Coiling embolization strategy for medium-to-giant-sized intracranial aneurysms treated with pipeline embolization device: a propensity score-weighted study

OBJECTIVES

We aim to investigate associations between different coil strategies and outcomes in the aneurysms treated by a pipeline embolization device (PED).

METHODS

Patients with medium-to-giant-sized aneurysms treated by PED were included. The total cohort was divided into PED-alone and PED-coiling groups, and the PED-coiling group was further divided into loose and dense packing subgroups. Multivariate logistic analyses and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) were performed to investigate the relationships between coiling strategies and outcomes. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves were used to describe the coiling degree and angiographic outcome relationship.

RESULTS

A total of 398 patients with 410 aneurysms were included. Aneurysms treated with PED coiling had a lower incomplete occlusion rate (15.3% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.002), higher total perioperative complication rate (14.2% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.001), longer production time (142.14 min vs. 101.26 min, p < 0.001), and higher total cost ($45,158.63 vs. $34,680.91, p < 0.001) than those treated with PED alone. There were no differences in outcomes between the loose and dense packing subgroups. However, the total cost was higher in the dense packing group ($43,787.46 vs. $47,288.32, p = 0.001) than in the loose packing group. The result was still robust in the multivariate and sIPTW analyses. The RCS curves showed "L-shape" relationships between the coil degree and angiographic outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Compared with PED alone, PED coiling could improve aneurysm occlusion. However, it could also increase the total complication risk, prolong procedure time, and increase the total cost. Compared with loose packing, dense packing did not enhance the treatment effectiveness but increased the treatment cost.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The additional treatment effect from coiling embolization declines sharply after a certain point. Specifically, the aneurysm occlusion rate is roughly stable when the coil number is greater than 3 or the total coil length is longer than 150 cm.

KEY POINTS

• Compared with pipeline embolization device (PED) alone, PED combined with coiling can improve aneurysm occlusion. • Compared with PED alone, PED combined with coiling increases the total complication risk, cost, and prolongs procedure time. • Compared with loose packing, dense packing did not increase the treatment effectiveness but increased the cost.

Flow diversion for compressive unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms with neuro-ophthalmological symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Data on the safety and efficacy of flow diverters (FD) for the treatment of unruptured internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms with compressive neuro-ophthalmological symptoms (NOS) are scarce and comprise mainly small case series.

METHODS

We performed a search of three databases and included series with ≥10 patients, with unruptured aneurysms of the ICA and NOS, treated with FD. Random-effects analysis of treatment results and safety was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies reporting on 594 patients were included. Pooled proportions of NOS recovery, improvement, transient and permanent worsening were: 47.4% (95% CI 35.0% to 60.1%); 74.5% (95% CI 67.9% to 80.2%); 7.1% (95% CI 3.3% to 14.7%); and 4.9% (95% CI 3.2% to 7.4%), respectively. Rates of complete recovery and improvement in patients with isolated visual symptoms were 30.6% (95% CI 12.5% to 57.7%) and 56.6% (95% CI 42.3% to 69.9%). Isolated oculomotor symptoms recovered completely in 47.8% (95% CI 29.9% to 66.3%) and improved in 78% (95% CI 69.2% to 84.9%). Morbidity occurred in 5% (95% CI 2.8% to 9%) and mortality in 3.9% (95% CI 2% to 7.5%) of patients. An increased likelihood of symptom improvement was observed when treatment was performed early (<1 month) after symptom onset (OR=11.22, 95% CI 3.9% to 32.5%).

CONCLUSION

Flow diversion promotes recovery or improvement of compressive symptoms in a large proportion of patients but is associated with significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Transient and permanent NOS worsening is not uncommon. Early treatment is of utmost importance, as it increases the likelihood of symptom improvement more than 10-fold.

Safety and efficacy of pipeline embolization device treatments for intradural internal carotid artery aneurysms in a single center in a Japanese population

Background:

The pipeline embolization device (PED) is the most common flow diverter device in the world. To date, there have been no reports of treatment outcomes specific to intradural internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. The safety and efficacy of the PED treatments for intradural ICA aneurysms are reported.

Methods:

131 patients with 133 aneurysms underwent PED treatments for intradural ICA aneurysms. The mean aneurysm dome size and neck length were 12.7 ± 4.3 mm and 6.1 ± 2.2 mm, respectively. We used adjunctive endosaccular coil embolization for 88 aneurysms (66.2%). A total of 113 aneurysms (85%) were angiographically followed up 6 months following the procedure, and 93 aneurysms (69.9%) were followed up for 1 year.

Results:

The angiographic outcome at 6 months showed that 94 (83.2%) aneurysms had O’Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grade D, 6 (5.3%) had C, 10 (8.8%) had B, and 3 (2.7%) had A. At 1 year, 82 (88.2%) aneurysms had OKM grade D, 6 (6.5%) had C, 3 (3.2%) had B, and 2 (2.2%) had A. Multivariate analysis showed that aneurysm neck size and adjunctive coiling were statistically significant in aneurysm occlusion status. Major morbidity modified Rankin Scale >2 and mortality rates related to procedures were 3.0% and 0%, respectively. Delayed aneurysm ruptures were not observed.

Conclusion:

These results reveal that PED treatment of intradural ICA aneurysms is safe and efficacious. The combined use of adjunctive coil embolization not only prevents delayed aneurysm ruptures but also contributes to an increase in the rate of complete occlusion.

A comparison of antiplatelet therapy during the peri- and post-operative periods following flow-diverting stent insertion for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Flow diverters (FDs) are neuroendovascular stents indicated for the management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Due to their composition, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is essential during the peri- and post-operative periods to prevent thromboembolic events. However, there is limited consensus within the scientific community regarding which antiplatelets to use and dosing following neuroendovascular treatment of aneurysms.

METHOD

A systematic search of four electronic databases was conducted during November 2020 that included studies published between January 2010 and November 2020. Eligibility for inclusion included primary research articles, published in the English language and use of flow-diverting intracranial stents. Studies were excluded if they utilised combined therapies (e.g. FD with stent-assisted coiling), animal studies, clinical trial protocols and study population of less than 10 subjects.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were identified for inclusion with a total of 1312 patients with 1355 unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with FDs. Of these, 13 studies primarily investigated the use of clopidogrel with aspirin with low rates of haemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications. A forest plot of nine of these studies showed average efficacy of 88% at 95% confidence interval (CI) (SD + 5%) with 63% heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

The large proportion of studies investigating clopidogrel and aspirin antiplatelet therapy presents a challenge in comparing antiplatelet regimens. Although prasugrel and ticagrelor have been identified as suitable alternatives to clopidogrel, these were based on studies with small cohort sizes. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors may be efficacious as rescue therapy for intra-procedural thrombosis. Further research is required to determine which antiplatelet is most suitable.

Bilateral blindness following flow diverter placement in a giant thrombosed cavernous carotid aneurysm: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

The best treatment option for giant intracranial aneurysms (GIAs) is still debated. The authors report a case of a giant thrombosed cavernous carotid artery (CCA) aneurysm for which two sessions of flow diverter (FD) placement failed, leading to bilateral blindness.

OBSERVATIONS

A 66-year-old man presented to an outside center with a history of rapid-onset right-sided retro-orbital pain, visual deterioration, and restricted eye movements associated with headache, vomiting, and diminished sensations on the right side of the face. He was diagnosed with an unruptured thrombosed giant CCA aneurysm and was treated twice with unsuccessful FDs. At follow-up, he developed blindness in both eyes. After 1.5 years, he presented to the authors' institution with headache, vomiting, and epistaxis, for which he underwent high-flow external carotid artery-M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery bypass grafting using the radial artery as a conduit and ligation of the internal carotid artery in the neck without any added neurological deficits.

LESSONS

This dreadful complication of bilateral blindness after being treated with repeated unsuccessful FDs has not been reported in the literature. It could have been avoided if microsurgery had been the primary modality of treatment.

Tubridge flow diverter alone vs. Tubridge flow diverter and coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A propensity score matching analysis

Background

The study was designed to assess the clinical performance of a tubridge flow diverter (TFD) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and to compare the efficacy and safety between intracranial aneurysms treated with TFD alone and TFD combined with coiling.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients treated with the TFD alone or TFD combined with coiling between June 2018 to November 2022 were included. The patient demographics, the characteristics of the aneurysm, and the treatment outcomes between the two groups were compared. Propensity score matching was performed to match the variables with a significant difference between groups.

Results

In the current study, data from 93 consecutive patients including 104 aneurysms treated with TFD were analyzed. In total, 43 patients with 49 aneurysms were treated with TFD alone, and 50 patients with 55 aneurysms were treated with TFD combined with coiling. Aneurysms in the TFD combined with the coiling group were larger (12.9 ± 8.6 vs. 8.7 ± 8.8 mm, P = 0.016) and more likely to be saccular (92.7% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.027) than in the TFD alone group. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of perioperative complication rate. During the follow-up period, the complete occlusion rate in the TFD combined with the coiling group was higher (80.0% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.001) than in the TFD alone group. These results were further confirmed using a propensity score matching analysis.

Conclusion

TFD combined with coiling can be a safe and effective alternative option for the treatment of complex aneurysms. Given the potential risks of these therapeutic modalities, thus very careful consideration is required on an individual patient basis.

Progressive volume reduction and long-term aneurysmal collapse following flow diversion treatment of giant and symptomatic cerebral aneurysms

Background

The primary goal of conventional endovascular and microvascular approaches is the clinical and radiological resolution of the symptomatic aneurysm-induced mass effect. This study assessed the volume changes and mass effect reduction due to sac shrinkage after treatment with flow diverter stents (FD) for unruptured cerebral aneurysms.

Methods

We analyzed retrospectively 36 symptomatic aneurysms that were larger or equal to 25 mm in diameter in patients treated at our center from January 2016 to April 2022. Radiological and clinical outcomes were analyzed, including aneurysmal volume changes and resolution of aneurysm-related symptoms.

Results

At 6 months, 25 aneurysms decreased in size, 2 remained unchanged, and 9 aneurysms demonstrated a post-treatment dimensional increase. At 12 months, 30 aneurysms showed a progressive radiological volume reduction. Either no change or negligible shrinkage was observed in the remaining six aneurysms. At 24 months, 32 aneurysms showed aneurysmal shrinkage by a mean 47% volume loss with respect to baseline. At the last follow-up, all 13 patients who had presented with third cranial nerve palsy showed improvements. Complete reversal of the pretreatment edematous changes was confirmed in all cases. The overall post-treatment complication rate was 8.3%, as 3 patients experienced non-fatal delayed rupture of their aneurysm. There was no mortality in this study.

Conclusion

Flow diversion could effectively induce progressive aneurysmal shrinkage and resolution of the mass effect associated with giant symptomatic cerebral aneurysms.

Small Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Can Be Effectively Treated With Flow-Diverting Devices

Purpose

To investigate the effect and safety of flow diverters in the management of small (<10 mm in diameter) unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Materials and Methods

One hundred and ten patients with 145 small intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical, endovascular, and follow-up data were analyzed.

Results

One hundred twenty-one flow diverters were deployed for the treatment of 145 small intracranial aneurysms in 110 patients, and the stenting success rate was 99.1%. In 133 (91.7%) aneurysms, only flow-diverting devices were deployed, and in the rest 12 (8.3%) of aneurysms, coils were used to loosely pack the aneurysm after deployment of a flow-diverting device. Five patients (4.5%) experienced ischemic complications, but no hemorrhagic complications were occurred. All patients had clinical follow-up 6-18 (median 12) after the procedure, with the modified Rankin scale score (mRS) 0 in 101 patients, 1 in four patients, 2 in three patients, 4 in one patient, and 5 in one patient. Digital subtraction angiography was performed at follow-up in 90 (81.8%) patients with 118 (81.4%) aneurysms 6-18 months (median 12) after the procedure, with the Raymond grade I in 90 (76.2%) aneurysms and Raymond grade III in 28 (23.7%). Eighteen patients with 22 partially occluded aneurysms at the first angiographic follow-up experienced the second digital subtraction angiography 12-36 months (median 26) after the procedure, and 21 (95.5%) aneurysms were completely occluded. Two patients had asymptomatic in-stent stenosis.

Conclusion

Treatment of small unruptured intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters can be performed safely and effectively with satisfactory outcomes.

Flow Diversion vs. Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Intradural Large Vertebrobasilar Artery Aneurysms

Objective

To compare the safety, angiographic, and long-term clinical outcomes of intradural large vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) aneurysms following flow diversion (FD) or conventional stent-assisted coiling (SAC).

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with intradural large VBA aneurysms between 2014 and 2021 who underwent FD or SAC. Patients' characteristics, postprocedural complications, and clinical and angiographic outcome details were reviewed.

Results

A total of 66 intradural large VBA aneurysms were included, including 42 (63.6%), which were treated with SAC (SAC group) and 24 (36.4%), which were treated with FD (FD group). Clinical follow-up was obtained at the median of 24.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 12.0–45.0] months, with 34 (81.0%) patients achieved the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 in the SAC group and 21 (87.5%) patients in the FD group. Thirteen (19.7%) patients experienced neurological complications, of which 9 (13.6%) patients first occurred during the periprocedural phase and 4 (6.1%) patients first occurred during follow-up. The overall complication rate and periprocedural complication rate were both higher in the SAC group, but did not reach statistical significance (23.8 vs. 12.5%, P = 0.430; 16.7 vs. 8.3%, P = 0.564). The mortality rates were similar between the groups (11.9 vs. 12.5%). Angiographic follow-up was available for 46 patients at the median of 7 (IQR 6–14) months, with a numerically higher complete occlusion rate in the SAC group (82.1 vs. 55.6%, P = 0.051) and similar adequate aneurysm occlusion rates between the groups (85.7 vs. 83.3%, P = 1.000). In the multivariate analysis, ischemic onset (P = 0.019), unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice (P = 0.008), and older age (≥60 years) (P = 0.031) were significantly associated with complications.

Conclusion

There was a trend toward lower complication rate and lower complete occlusion rate for intradural large VBA aneurysms following FD as compared to SAC. FD and SAC have comparable mortality rates and favorable outcomes. Ischemic onset, unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice, and older age could increase the risk of complications.

Recovery from Cranial Nerve Symptoms after Flow Diversion without Coiling for Unruptured Very Large and Giant ICA Aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cranial nerve symptoms, including visual impairment and ophthalmoplegia, are one of the most common presentations of very large and giant (≥15 mm) ICA aneurysms. In this study, we evaluated the treatment outcomes of flow diversion and conventional coiling in terms of recovery from cranial nerve symptoms and postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-nine patients with unruptured ICA aneurysms of >15 mm who were treated with flow diversion or conventional coiling between December 2009 and December 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. We compared the radiologic and clinical outcomes, including recovery from cranial nerve symptoms, between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 49 patients (57.1%) treated with flow diversion and 10 of 30 patients (33.3%) treated with conventional coiling initially presented with cranial nerve symptoms (P = .068). In the clinical follow-up, the symptom recovery rate was significantly higher in those treated with flow diversion (15 [50%] versus 3 [25%] with conventional coiling, P = .046). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that flow diversion was significantly associated with symptom recovery (OR, 7.425; 95% CI, 1.091-50.546; P = .040). The overall postoperative complication rate was similar (flow diversion, 10 [20.4%]; conventional coiling, 6 [20.0%], P = .965), though fatal hemorrhagic complications occurred only in patients with intradurally located aneurysms treated with flow diversion (4 [8.2%] versus 0 [0.0%] with coiling, P = .108).

CONCLUSIONS

Flow diversion without coiling for very large and giant ICA aneurysms yielded a higher rate of recovery from cranial nerve symptoms, but it may be related to an increased hemorrhagic complication rate, especially for intradurally located aneurysms.

Comparison of the Pipeline embolisation device alone or combined with coiling for treatment of different sizes of intracranial aneurysms

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare complications and outcomes between intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolisation device (PED) alone or with PED combined with coiling for different-sized aneurysms.

Method

Patients with aneurysms treated by PED were collected from the PED in China postmarket multicentre registry study. We performed a propensity match analysis to compare the efficacy and safety between PED alone and PED combined with coiling treatment, and then aneurysms were organised into three groups based on their size: small (≤7 mm), medium (≤15 mm to >7 mm) and large/giant (>15 mm). Complications and aneurysm occlusion rates in the aneurysm size groups were compared between PED alone and PED combined with coiling patients.

Result

A total of 1171 patients with 1322 aneurysms were included. All patients received clinical follow-up, while angiographic follow-up was available in 967 aneurysms. For small aneurysms, there was no difference in the aneurysm occlusion rate between two groups (79.1% vs 88.4%, respectively), while there was a significant increase in the ischaemic complication rate (8.3% vs 19.3%, respectively, p=0.0001). For medium and large/giant saccular aneurysms, PED combined with coiling significantly improved the occlusion rate (medium aneurysms: 74.7% vs 88.8%, respectively, p<0.0001; large/giant saccular aneurysms: 72.9% vs 86.9%, respectively, p=0.018), while there were no differences in the total complication rate. For large/giant non-saccular aneurysms, two groups showed no differences.

Conclusion

Use of the PED with adjunctive coils can significantly improve the occlusion rate of medium aneurysms, without increasing the total complication rate.

Pipeline flow diversion with adjunctive coil embolization for internal carotid artery aneurysms following an intradural component: results in 46 consecutive aneurysms from a Japanese single-center experience

In the treatment of an intracranial aneurysm with the flow diverter, the combined use of coil embolization can help promote subsequent progressive thrombosis within the aneurysm sac and reduce the risk of delayed aneurysm rupture. This study retrospectively reviewed outcomes of patients who had undergone the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) with adjunctive coil embolization (PED/coil) at a single center to determine its safety and efficiency. Patients with internal carotid artery aneurysms following an intradural component were selected for PED/coil between 2015 and 2020. All patients were premedicated with dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin plus clopidogrel or prasugrel. A minimal number of PEDs were deployed, with coils inserted using a stent-jail technique, avoiding dense packing. A total of 46 aneurysms (43 patients; median dome size, 11.6 mm; median neck width, 6.3 mm) were treated with PED/coil. The median volume embolization ratio was 14.8%. The degree of angiographic filling at the 6-month and latest angiography showed complete occlusion in 60.5% (26/43) and 70.5% (31/44), respectively. Small (< 10 mm) aneurysms achieved a higher complete occlusion rate in the early period; a lower cumulative incidence of aneurysm occlusion was observed in large and giant (≥ 10 mm) aneurysms (P = .024). The median clinical follow-up was 22 months, and no aneurysm ruptures occurred. Favorable clinical outcomes were achieved, with permanent neurological morbidity of 4.7% and no mortality. PED/coil demonstrated a high angiographic occlusion rate at an early stage. Loosely packed coils are sufficient to obliterate aneurysms effectively.

Design and Analysis of a Biodegradable Polycaprolactone Flow Diverting Stent for Brain Aneurysms

The flow diverting stent (FDS) has become a promising endovascular device for the treatment of aneurysms. This research presents a novel biodegradable and non-braided Polycaprolactone (PCL) FDS. The PCL FDS was designed and developed using an in-house fabrication unit and coated on two ends with BaSO₄ for angiographic visibility. The mechanical flexibility and quality of FDS surfaces were examined with the UniVert testing machine, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and 3D profilometer. Human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) adhesion, proliferation, and cell morphology studies on PCL FDS were performed. The cytotoxicity and NO production by HUVECs with PCL FDS were also conducted. The longitudinal tensile, radial, and bending flexibility were found to be 1.20 ± 0.19 N/mm, 0.56 ± 0.11 N/mm, and 0.34 ± 0.03 N/mm, respectively. The FDS was returned to the original shape and diameter after repeated compression and bending without compromising mechanical integrity. Results also showed that the proliferation and adhesion of HUVECs on the FDS surface increased over time compared to control without FDS. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and NO production showed that PCL FDS were non-toxic and satisfactory. Cell morphology studies showed that HUVECs were elongated to cover the FD surface and developed an endothelial monolayer. This study is a step forward toward the development and clinical use of biodegradable flow diverting stents for endovascular treatment of the aneurysm.

Vertebral artery dissection and associated ruptured intracranial pseudoaneurysm successfully treated with coil assisted flow diversion: A case report and review of the literature

Dissecting intracranial pseudoaneurysms (IPs) are associated with a high incidence of rupture and poor neurologic outcomes. Lesions in the posterior circulation are particularly malignant and pose even greater management challenges. Traditional management consists of microsurgical vessel sacrifice with or without bypass. Flow diversion (FD) in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) represents a reconstructive treatment option and can be paired with coil embolization to promote more rapid thrombosis of the lesion. We report a case of a ruptured dissecting vertebral artery (VA) IP successfully acutely treated with coil-assisted FD. A 53-year-old male presented with a right V4 dissection spanning the origin of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery and associated ruptured V4 IP. The patient was treated with coil-assisted FD. Oral dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was initiated during the procedure, and intravenous tirofiban was used as a bridging agent. Immediate obliteration of the IP was achieved, with near-complete resolution of the dissection within 48 h. The patient made a complete recovery, and angiography at 6 weeks confirmed total IP obliteration, reconstruction of the VA, and a patent stent. The use of FD and DAPT in the setting of acute SAH remains controversial. We believe that coil-assisted FD in carefully selected patients offers significant advantages over traditional microsurgical and endovascular options. The risks posed by DAPT and potential for delayed thrombosis with FD can be effectively mitigated with planning and the development of protocols. We discuss the current literature in the context of our case and review the challenges associated with treating these often devastating lesions.

Current Strategies in the Treatment of Intracranial Large and Giant Aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Very large and giant aneurysms are among the most challenging cerebrovascular pathologies in neurosurgery.

METHODS

The aim of this paper is to review the current literature on the management of very large and giant aneurysms and to describe representative cases illustrating possible treatment strategies.

RESULTS

In view of the poor natural history, active management using multiprofessional individualized approaches is required to achieve aneurysm occlusion, relief of mass effect, and obliteration of the embolic source. Both reconstructive (clipping, coiling, stent-assisted coiling, flow diversion [FD]) and deconstructive techniques (parent artery occlusion [PAO], PAO in conjunction with bypass surgery, and strategies of flow modification) are available to achieve definitive treatment with acceptable morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients harboring such lesions should be managed at high-volume cerebrovascular centers by multidisciplinary teams trained in all techniques of open and endovascular neurosurgery.

Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) with or without Adjunctive Coiling in Treatment of Very Large and Giant Cerebral Aneurysms

PURPOSE

Flow diverter stents are gaining wider use in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms; however, there are limited data on occlusion and complication rates of flow diverters in very large and giant aneurysms. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) and FRED Jr. stents in aneurysms ≥ 20 mm.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all aneurysms ≥ 20 mm treated with FRED/FRED Jr. between January 2010 and June 2020 from three centers. Endpoints for clinical safety were absence of major stroke, aneurysmal rupture, or death and complete or near-complete occlusion for efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients with very large (28 cases) and giant aneurysms (17 cases) were treated with FRED (41 cases), and FRED Jr. (4 cases) stents. The majority of the aneurysms (40/45, 88.9%) were in the anterior circulation. Adjunctive aneurysm coiling was performed in 21 aneurysms (46.7%). Technical complications were encountered in 4 procedures (8.9%). Ischemic and hemorrhagic complication rates were 6.7% and 8.9%, respectively. There was no case with major stroke. The mortality rate was 8.9%, and all cases were due to hemorrhagic complications from aneurysmal rupture. Median angiographic follow-up was 21.5 months (range 3-60 months). Complete occlusion was achieved in 32 aneurysms (71.1%), and near-complete occlusion in 5 cases (11.1%).

CONCLUSION

The use of FRED/FRED Jr. for the treatment of aneurysms ≥ 20 mm achieved a long-term aneurysm occlusion rate and a safety profile comparable to the large series reported with other flow diverter stents.

Predictors of the Effects of Flow Diversion in Very Large and Giant Aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The treatment paradigm for very large and giant aneurysms has recently changed to flow diversion, in light of the results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms trial. However, the effects of flow diversion were definitely unknown. We explored this topic and identified the predictors of such effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients with unruptured aneurysms admitted to our institution for flow diversion between February 2014 and August 2019. Patients were categorized into an effect group (no filling or remnant entry) and a no-effect group (subtotal or total filling). We evaluated the aneurysm size and shape, incorporation vessel, parent artery stenosis and curvature, stagnation of contrast medium within the aneurysm, use of balloon angioplasty, and intra-aneurysm thrombus as potential predictors of the effects of flow diversion.

RESULTS

The effect group comprised 34 patients (66.7%, 34/51; no filling, 35.3%, 18/51; and remnant entry, 31.4%, 16/51). The no-effect group comprised 17 patients (33.3%, 17/51; subtotal filling, 29.4%, 15/51; and total filling, 3.9%, 2/51). An incorporation vessel and balloon angioplasty were independent risk factors for the no-effect group in multivariate logistic regression analyses (OR = 0.13 and 0.05; 95% confidence intervals, 0.02-0.62 and 0.00-0.32; P values, .021 and .004, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Flow diversion is effective for very large and giant aneurysms, but the outcomes require further improvement. The results of this study show that an incorporated vessel and excessive balloon angioplasty might compromise flow diversion. This finding can help improve the outcomes of flow diversion.

Endovascular management of large and giant intracranial aneurysms: Experience from a tertiary care neurosurgery institute in India

Objective

With the development of endovascular technique and devices, large and giant intracranial aneurysms are increasingly being managed by this less invasive method. Here we discuss our experience on managing such aneurysms via endovascular technique.

Methods

Retrospective data on 42 patients with large and giant intracranial aneurysms managed by endovascular techniques between September 2015 to December 2017 at our neurosurgery institute were included in this analysis.

Results

There were a total 42 patients with 9 giant and 33 large aneurysms in this study. Eight aneurysms were treated by parent vessel occlusion, 22 aneurysms with coils and rest 12 aneurysms were treated with stent assisted coiling. Following the procedure, Raymond class I occlusion was accomplished in 31 (73.8%) patients while class Ⅱ in 9 (21.4%) and class Ⅲ in 2 (4.8%) patients. Overall morbidity and mortality were 9.5% and 14.3% respectively and favorable outcome was seen in 80.9% patients. Significant correlation was observed with clinical outcome and initial neurological status.

Conclusions

The study indicates that endovascular intervention is a safe and effective method in managing large and giant intracranial aneurysms with lesser morbidity and mortality.

Giant aneurysm of the bilateral vertebrobasilar junction treated by pipeline and coils: A case report and literature review

Giant aneurysm of the posterior circulation is associated with a higher risk of rupture compared with that of the anterior circulation. Furthermore, surgical clipping and interventional embolization for giant aneurysm of the posterior circulation are more difficult and complex to perform. The present study reported on the case of a 26-year-old female who exhibited a giant spherical aneurysm of the vertebrobasilar junction (VBJ) with a maximum diameter of ~35 mm that caused cervical discomfort. In addition, the patient experienced symptoms including left-sided walking and hoarseness caused by the compression of the brainstem and the posterior cranial nerves. The risks associated with performing surgery in this area are high and the prognosis is mainly poor. The patient of the present study was treated using the Pipeline Flex device with coil embolization. As a giant aneurysm of the VBJ simultaneously affects the bilateral vertebral arteries (VAs) and basilar artery, it is a unique condition and the treatment strategy must be personalized. Based on an analysis of the hemodynamic influence on the aneurysm in the present case, the Pipeline was placed through the left VA, the coils were packed through the right VA, and finally, the right VA was proximally occluded. At 7 months after embolization, the patient's modified Rankin scale score was 1 point. Upon analysis of the hemodynamic influence on the aneurysm of the VBJ, the VA with the larger shear force on the wall of the aneurysm was selected for occlusion to simplify the treatment of the aneurysm and to maximize the probability to achieve recovery.

Unruptured Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: Risk Factors for Mortality and Long-Term Outcome

This study aims to investigate the long-term outcomes of unruptured giant intracranial aneurysms (GIAs) with different treatment modalities and to analyze the factors affecting prognosis. We performed a retrospective medical record review of patients with unruptured GIAs treated at our institution from 2011 to 2018. Prognosis was compared to the best medical treatment without intervention (conservative treatment, CT) and surgical (ST) or endovascular (ET) treatment. Risk factors for mortality were investigated. A total of 276 patients were included in this study. Patients received CT in 16.3%, ST in 30.1%, and ET in 53.6% of cases. After an average 7-year follow-up, the rupture rate after CT was 22.2%, accounting for an annual rupture rate of 7.3%. The postoperative complication rate was 30.1% and 8.1% after ST and ET, respectively. The recurrence rate after ET was 10.1%, compared with ST which was 1.2%. The follow-up mortality in unruptured GIAs was 26.7% after CT, 7.2% after ST, and 5.4% after ET. Older age (50~59, HR 5.877; 60~69, HR 8.565), size ≥ 40 mm (HR 3.916), and posterior circulation location (HR 6.411) were associated with increased mortality. ET significantly decreased mortality (HR 0.191). Unruptured GIAs warrant treatment if feasible due to the high rupture rate and mortality of the natural history. Older age, posterior circulation location, and larger size are risk factors for poor prognosis. Both ST and ET showed a lower mortality rate than CT. ST showed less likely recurrence compared to ET, while ET had a lower complication rate than ST.

Pipeline Embolization Device With Adjunctive Coils for the Treatment of Unruptured Large or Giant Vertebrobasilar Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience

Objective: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of Pipeline embolization device (PED) for large or giant verterbrobasilar aneurysms (LGVBAs), and to compare the therapeutic effects of PED with and without adjunctive coils. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 21 cases of unruptured LGVBAs who were treated in our hospital with PED. These cases were divided into "PED group" and "PED with adjunctive coils group." We compared the aneurysm characteristics and treatment outcomes between the two groups. Results: The overall neurological complication rate was 28.6% (6/21) and the mortality rate was 4.8% (1/21). There were 12 patients in the PED group and nine in the PED with adjunctive coils group. There were no significant differences in age, smoking, hypertension, aneurysm size, aneurysm location, or operation time between the two groups. The complete aneurysm embolization rate and favorable outcome rate (modified Rankin Scale = 0,1) of the PED with adjunctive coils group was 78% (7/9) and 100% (9/9), respectively, which were both better compared with the PED group with 63.6% (7/11) and 83% (10/12), respectively. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The effectiveness and safety of PED for LGVBAs is acceptable. Treatment results did not differ between the PED and PED with adjunctive coils groups; therefore, whether coils should be used may depend the operator. Our results suggest that correct use of the coils does not increase complications. We suggest that PED with adjunctive coils should be used for some selected LGVBAs.

Surgical Management of Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: Overall Results of a Large Series

OBJECTIVE

To review and discuss surgical treatment options for giant intracranial aneurysms (GIAs), focusing on indications, technical aspects, and results, along with some illustrative cases.

METHODS

We reviewed the data of 82 consecutive patients surgically managed between January 2000 and December 2019 for treatment of a GIA.

RESULTS

Male sex and hemorrhage at presentation were prevalent. The average follow-up was 81.2 ± 45 months. The anterior circulation was involved in 76.8% of GIAs. If the GIA showed a clear neck, minimal atherosclerosis, or intrasaccular thrombosis, and ≤2 branches arising from the neck, it was reconstructed. This procedure was possible in 78% of cases. The technique also involved temporary clipping, remodeling, and thrombectomy, as well as fragmentation techniques. Angioarchitectural features other than these techniques underwent bypass and aneurysm trapping. Most bypasses were extracranial to intracranial and high flow. Flow capacity, collateral circulation, and availability of the donor vessel mainly affected the choice of the type of bypass. Overall, successful exclusion of the GIA was 91.4%. The need for retreatment and complication rate were 3.6% and 19.5%, respectively. A good overall outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3) was achieved in 84.2% of patients, and mortality was 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Microneurosurgical techniques still maintain a significant role for most GIAs, with a high durability and acceptable rate of morbidity and mortality. Clip reconstruction is the first-line surgical treatment option, whereas bypass is indicated in cases of planned or unplanned sacrifice of the parent artery to prevent long-term ischemic complications.

Flow diversion for internal carotid artery aneurysms: Impact of complex aneurysm features and overview of outcome

OBJECTIVE

Flow diversion is a popular technique used to treat ordinary small, as well as complex internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. We describe aneurysm occlusion rates, complications and patient outcomes in patients with ICA aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified all consecutive patients with ICA aneurysms that were treated with flow diverter stents between 2014 and 2019 at our institution. We divided the aneurysms into two anatomic subgroups (cavernous and supraclinoid segments). All the imaging studies and medical records were reviewed for relevant features in relation to aneurysms, complications and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients with 76 ICA aneurysms (72 unruptured; 4 ruptured) were treated with 70 flow diversion procedures, including six re-treatments. Complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 61 % of patients at 6-month follow-up (cavernous 69 %, supraclinoid 58 %), and in 69 % at the latest follow-up (mean of 18 months). Postprocedural intracranial ischemia or hemorrhage was seen in 24 % of patients, including two aneurysm ruptures after flow diversion, and related major long-term functional decline or mortality was seen in 6% of patients. Preprocedural dysfunction of extraocular muscles or vision disturbance improved moderately at best (40-60 %). At the latest follow-up, 54 patients (87 %) were functionally independent (mRS ≤2).

CONCLUSION

Flow diversion for cavernous and supraclinoid ICA aneurysms demonstrated acceptable results, but complex aneurysm features cause uncertainty in predicting aneurysm occlusion probability. Patients should be informed of the non-negligible rate of complications, and of only moderate improvement rate of cranial nerve dysfunctions.

Findings and Prognostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Recent studies imply an association between aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and aneurysm rupture. We investigated the prevalence and clinical significance of AWE and enhancement within the aneurysm (inner enhancement [IE]) in coiled aneurysms.

METHODS

We assessed the frequency of AWE and IE after coil embolization on postinterventional magnetic resonance imaging (<6 weeks) in 30 consecutive patients with 33 aneurysms and elucidated the association between enhancement and subsequent aneurysm recurrence or hemorrhage.

RESULTS

AWE and IE occurred in 97% and 36% of cases, respectively. There was no rehemorrhage, and there was no significant association between subsequent reperfusion and AWE (P = 0.200) or IE (P = 0.148) during a median follow-up period of 19 months. The greatest share of IE (8 of 12 aneurysms) was found in incompletely coiled aneurysms with small remnants (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AWE after coil embolization cannot be used for recurrence risk stratification owing to its high prevalence. IE is likely to represent contrast inflow in the coiled aneurysm.

Agreement of intracranial vessel diameters measured on 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography using an automatic windowing algorithm

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Precise vessel measurement plays a major role in size selection of stents used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and became even more critical after the introduction of flow diverter stents. We assessed agreement between intracranial vessel diameters of aneurysm patients measured on 2D digital subtraction (2D DSA) and 3D volume rendering digital subtraction angiography (3D DSA) images using an automatic windowing algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients with intracranial aneurysms were enrolled and 120 measurement points were selected on both 2D and 3D DSA images acquired by a biplane angiographic system. Automatic windowing was applied to the 3D DSA images. Inter-method agreement of vessel measurements on 2D and 3D DSA images was assessed by Bland Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Inter- and intra-rater agreement of measurements on 3D DSA images were assessed by ICCs.

RESULTS

The mean differences between measurements on 2D and 3D DSA images were 0.14mm for the ICA, and 0.18mm for the ACA and MCA, which is about the size of one 3D DSA image voxel. For ICA measurements, inter-method, inter-rater and intra-rater agreements were good or excellent (consistency and absolute ICC≥0.95). For ACA and MCA measurements, the inter-method, inter-rater and intra-rater agreements were also good or excellent (consistency ICC=0.94, 0.89 and 0.93, absolute ICC=0.83, 0.84 and 0.85 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Vessel diameters may be measured on 3D DSA images with sufficient reliability for clinical use when applying an automatic windowing algorithm.

Tulip Giant Aneurysm Amputation and "Shingle Clip Cut Clip" Technique for Microsurgical Reconstruction of a Giant Thrombosed Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm

In this video, we present the case of a 61-year-old female who was brought to the emergency department after she had partial complex seizures. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed a right temporal lobe mass, which was initially thought to be a tumor. The patient was therefore referred to us for further management. The round nature of the lesion raised suspicion for an aneurysm. Computed tomography angiography was performed, followed by a diagnostic conventional cerebral angiogram, and confirmed the presence of a giant thrombosed aneurysm. Giant aneurysms represent 3%-5% of all cerebral aneurysms.¹ They are more common in females with a ratio of 2:1 to 3:1.¹ They have a high risk of rupture up to 50% in the posterior circulation and 40% in the anterior circulation over 5 years according to the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators.^2,3 Their treatment can be complex and treacherous. Treatment options vary widely from parent artery sacrifice in select cases to clip reconstruction to an array of endovascular approaches such as flow diversion. In some cases a combination of both open and endovascular approaches might be necessary.^4-8 In our case, we opted for an open surgical clip reconstruction. A superior temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass was attempted to allow for trapping of the aneurysm without risking ischemic complication distal to it. Unfortunately, the patient's vessels were too atherosclerotic to maintain patency. A strategy was then devised, which consisted of cutting the dome of the aneurysm and clearing the distal two thirds of the clot ("tulip technique") and then completing thrombus resection under temporary occlusion. Once clot removal was completed, the aneurysm was clipped using the "shingle clip cut clip" technique (Video 1). The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient remained seizure free.

Cranial nerve deficits in giant cavernous carotid aneurysms and their relation to aneurysm morphology and location

BACKGROUND

Giant cavernous carotid aneurysms (GCCAs) usually exert substantial mass effect on adjacent intracavernous cranial nerves. Since predictors of cranial nerve deficits (CNDs) in patients with GCCA are unknown, we designed a study to identify associations between CND and GCCA morphology and the location of mass effect.

METHODS

This study was based on data from the prospective clinical and imaging databases of the Giant Intracranial Aneurysm Registry. We used magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography to examine GCCA volume, presence of partial thrombosis (PT), GCCA origins, and the location of mass effect. We also documented whether CND was present.

RESULTS

We included 36 GCCA in 34 patients, which had been entered into the registry by eight participating centers between January 2009 and March 2016. The prevalence of CND was 69.4%, with one CND in 41.7% and more than one in 27.5%. The prevalence of PT was 33.3%. The aneurysm origin was most frequently located at the anterior genu (52.8%). The prevalence of CND did not differ between aneurysm origins (p = 0.29). Intracavernous mass effect was lateral in 58.3%, mixed medial/lateral in 27.8%, and purely medial in 13.9%. CND occurred significantly more often in GCCA with lateral (81.0%) or mixed medial/lateral (70.0%) mass effect than in GCCA with medial mass effect (20.0%; p = 0.03). After adjusting our data for the effects of the location of mass effect, we found no association between the prevalence of CND and aneurysm volume (odds ratio (OR) 1.30 (0.98-1.71); p = 0.07), the occurrence of PT (OR 0.64 (0.07-5.73); p = 0.69), or patient age (OR 1.02 (95% CI 0.95-1.09); p = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Distinguishing between medial versus lateral location of mass effect may be more helpful than measuring aneurysm volumes or examining aneurysm thrombosis in understanding why some patients with GCCA present with CND while others do not.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO

NCT02066493 ( clinicaltrials.gov ).

Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverter Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The implantation of flow-diverter stents for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms required further investigation.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to analyze the outcomes after flow diversion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of 3 databases was performed for studies published from 2006 to 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we included studies (from 2010 to 2018) reporting acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diversion.

DATA ANALYSIS

Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the following: aneurysm occlusion rate, complications, rebleeding, and factors influencing the studied outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We included 20 studies evaluating 223 patients with acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverter stents. Immediate angiographic occlusion was obtained in 32% (29/86; 95% CI, 15.4%-48%; I² = 79.6%) of aneurysms, whereas long-term complete/near-complete aneurysm occlusion was 88.9% (162/189; 95% CI, 84%-93.5%; I² = 20.9%) (mean radiologic follow-up of 9.6 months). The treatment-related complication rate was 17.8% (42/223; 95% CI, 11%-24%; I² = 52.6%). Complications were higher in the posterior circulation (16/72 = 27%; 95% CI, 14%-40%; I² = 66% versus 18/149 = 11.7%; 95% CI, 7%-16%; I² = 0%) (P = .004) and after treatment with multiple stents (14/52 = 26%; 95% CI, 14%-45%; I² = 59%) compared with a single stent (20/141 = 10%; 95% CI, 5%-15%; I² = 0%) (P = .004). Aneurysm rebleeding after treatment was 4% (5/223; 95% CI, 1.8%-7%; I² = 0%) and was higher in the first 72 hours.

LIMITATIONS

Small and retrospective series.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow-diversion treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms yields a high rate of long-term angiographic occlusion with a relatively low rate of aneurysm rebleeding. However, treatment is associated with a complication rate of 18%. When coiling or microsurgical clipping are not feasible strategies, anterior circulation ruptured aneurysms can be effectively treated with a flow-diversion technique, minimizing the number of stents deployed. Given the 27% rate of complications, flow diversion for ruptured posterior circulation aneurysms should be considered only in selected cases not amenable to other treatments.

Endovascular Treatment of Very Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison between Reconstructive and Deconstructive Techniques-A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of reconstructive and deconstructive endovascular treatments of very large/giant intracranial aneurysms are not completely clear.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to compare treatment-related outcomes between these 2 techniques.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of 3 data bases was performed for studies published from 1990 to 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

We selected series of reconstructive and deconstructive treatments with >10 patients.

DATA ANALYSIS

Random-effects meta-analysis was used to analyze occlusion rates, complications, and neurologic outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty-nine studies evaluating 894 very large/giant aneurysms were included. Long-term occlusion of unruptured aneurysms was 71% and 93% after reconstructive and deconstructive treatments, respectively (P = .003). Among unruptured aneurysms, complications were lower after parent artery occlusion (16% versus 30%, P = .05), whereas among ruptured lesions, complications were lower after reconstructive techniques (34% versus 38%). Parent artery occlusion in the posterior circulation had higher complications compared with in the anterior circulation (36% versus 15%, P = .001). Overall, coiling yielded lower complication and occlusion rates compared with flow diverters and stent-assisted coiling. Complication rates of flow diversion were lower in the anterior circulation (17% versus 41%, P < .01). Among unruptured lesions, early aneurysm rupture (within 30 days) was slightly higher after reconstructive treatment (5% versus 0%, P = .08) and after flow diversion alone compared with flow diversion plus coiling (7% versus 0%).

LIMITATIONS

Limitations were selection and publication biases.

CONCLUSIONS

Parent artery occlusion allowed high rates of occlusion with an acceptable rate of complications for unruptured, anterior circulation aneurysms. Coiling should be preferred for posterior circulation and ruptured lesions, whereas flow diversion is relatively safe and effective for unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms.