Vinorelbine after paclitaxel in breast cancer: cross resistance and cumulative neurotoxicity?

Prior acquired resistance to paclitaxel relays diverse EGFR-targeted therapy persistence mechanisms

Secondary drug resistance stems from dynamic clonal evolution during the development of a prior primary resistance. This collateral type of resistance is often a characteristic of cancer recurrence. Yet, mechanisms that drive this collateral resistance and their drug-specific trajectories are still poorly understood. Using resistance selection and small-scale pharmacological screens, we find that cancer cells with primary acquired resistance to the microtubule-stabilizing drug paclitaxel often develop tolerance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), leading to formation of more stable resistant cell populations. We show that paclitaxel-resistant cancer cells follow distinct selection paths under EGFR-TKIs by enriching the stemness program, developing a highly glycolytic adaptive stress response, and rewiring an apoptosis control pathway. Collectively, our work demonstrates the alterations in cellular state stemming from paclitaxel failure that result in collateral resistance to EGFR-TKIs and points to new exploitable vulnerabilities during resistance evolution in the second-line treatment setting.

Absence of major peripheral neuropathy in a phase II trial of ifosfamide with vinorelbine in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum and paclitaxel

Both ifosfamide and vinorelbine have been shown to produce responses in women with previously treated ovarian cancer. However, vinorelbine has been reported to cause severe neuropathy in patients previously treated with paclitaxel. We assessed a regimen consisting of ifosfamide 1.6 g/m2/d and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2/d for 3 days consecutively every 21 days. Because these doses resulted in severe neutropenia despite the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, doses were reduced to a final level of ifosfamide 960 mg/m2/d and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/d. Peripheral sensory neuropathy was evaluated by questionnaire. A total of 30 women were treated. All had previously been treated with both a platinum compound and paclitaxel. One partial response was observed among 23 patients with measurable disease, and two CA-125 responses were noted among seven patients without measurable disease. Severe progressive neurotoxicity was not observed. Despite the fact that almost half the patients had not been exposed to cyclophosphamide, this regimen produced few responses. Superior response rates have been reported with single-agent vinorelbine at doses that do not require growth factor support. With this dose and schedule, vinorelbine is reasonably safe therapy for patients who have received prior paclitaxel and who have have mild baseline sensory neuropathy.

Neurological monitoring of neurotoxicity induced by paclitaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy

To evaluate the neurotoxicity of paclitaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy, we studied neurological and electrophysiological functions in 14 patients who had been treated with 1-7 courses of paclitaxel/cisplatin. The cumulative paclitaxel and cisplatin doses ranged from 175 to 1225 mg/m2 and 100-700 mg/m2, respectively. Neurological examinations as well as motor nerve conduction studies of the peroneal nerve were performed and summarised by means of a peripheral neuropathy score. Neurotoxicity with onset usually after the second treatment cycle occurred in 13 patients. 12 patients complained about sensory symptoms, 13 patients had impaired vibration sense and 8 patients developed additional muscle weakness, predominantly of the legs. Dysfunction of peroneal motor nerve conduction occurred in 13 patients. Reduction of amplitudes as well as slowing of conduction velocities were seen in 13 patients and prolonged distal latencies in 10 patients. The peripheral neuropathy score was elevated in 13 patients. Neurological symptoms, impairment of both vibration sense and tendon reflexes, and the peripheral neuropathy score increased with the cumulative doses of paclitaxel/cisplatin. Serial analysis among selected patients also revealed an increase in neurotoxicity with increasing cumulative drug doses. These data indicate the development of neurotoxicity in most patients treated with paclitaxel/cisplatin and also suggest that early signs of neurotoxicity can be detected by clinical examination with emphasis on symptoms as well as vibration sense and can be well documented by electrophysiological investigations.