The effects of induced abortion on subsequent reproduction

Separating Procedure-related Fears From Future Fertility Concerns Among a Cohort Seeking Abortion Information Online

INTRODUCTION

The general public and abortion patients in the United States have misinformation about the risks of infertility associated with abortion, which may influence abortion care-seeking.

METHODS

The Google Ads Abortion Access Study was a national study of people considering abortion and searching online for information. Participants completed baseline and follow-up surveys, providing free text responses to questions about barriers and facilitators to abortion. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the free text responses related to fertility and used thematic analysis to identify concerns raised about links between abortion and future fertility.

RESULTS

Of 864 participants who provided free text responses in the follow-up survey, 32 specifically mentioned fertility. Few expressed fear that complications from the abortion procedure would somehow lead to infertility; rather, most discussed complex and overlapping thoughts about how abortion factored into their reproductive life plans. These included age-related concerns, missing out on their "chance" to have a child, fear of being punished by God with infertility for having an abortion, and conflicting emotions if they had previously been told they were subfecund or infertile.

CONCLUSION

Although previous research has focused on misinformation about the link between abortion and infertility, participants in this study rarely mentioned it as a concern. Researchers and practitioners should be attuned to the distinctions people make between infertility occurring as a result of abortion and other fears they might have about not achieving their future reproductive aspirations, ask questions, and provide counseling accordingly.

Obedient mothers, healthy children: communication on the risks of reproduction in state-socialist Czechoslovakia

The article analyses medical communication in popular media relating to the risks in reproduction in the state-socialist Czechoslovakia between 1948 and 1989 and shows how it used emotions as an instrument to control women's reproductive behaviour. In particular, we use an approach inspired by Donati's (1992) political discourse analysis and by Snow and Bedford's (1988) framing analysis to explore communication on the risk of infertility in the abortion debate, the risk of fetal abnormalities in the prenatal screening debate, and the risk of emotional deprivation and morbidity in infants in the debate on mothering practices. The analysis contributes to the knowledge on how the construction of risk in reproduction, including childcare, serves to create a moral order of motherhood by defining what constitutes 'irresponsible' reproductive behaviours and their associated risks, and in doing so may lead to the further marginalisation of already marginalised people. We explain how expert discourse on reproduction and care aimed at the general public worked by constructing risks, a fear of these risks, and women's responsibility for avoiding them in order to regulate women's behaviour through self-discipline, which worked alongside other disciplinary techniques. These techniques were applied unequally and mainly to marginalised groups of women, such as women of Roma ethnicity and single mothers.

Time for Better Access to High-Quality Abortion Data in the United States

Despite considerable lay attention on the regulation and legislation of abortion in the United States, important gaps remain in our understanding of its incidence and health and social consequences since its legalization in 1973. Many of these gaps in knowledge can be attributed to a lack of access to high-quality, individual-level abortion data over the past 46 years. Herein, we review the strengths and limitations of different, currently available methods for enumerating abortions in the United States and discuss how lack of access to high-quality data limits our surveillance and research activities of not only abortion but other important reproductive and perinatal health outcomes. We conclude by discussing some potential opportunities for improved access to high-quality abortion data in the United States.

No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews evidence relating to the provision of surgical induced abortion (IA) and second trimester medical abortion, including pre- and post-procedural care.

INTENDED USERS

Gynaecologists, family physicians, nurses, midwives, residents, and other health care providers who currently or intend to provide and/or teach IAs.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with an unintended or abnormal first or second trimester pregnancy.

EVIDENCE

PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Database were searched using the key words: first-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester medical abortion, dilation and evacuation, induction abortion, feticide, cervical preparation, cervical dilation, abortion complications. Results were restricted to English or French systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies published from 1979 to July 2017. National and international clinical practice guidelines were consulted for review. Grey literature was not searched.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework. The summary of findings is available upon request.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

IA is safe and effective. The benefits of IA outweigh the potential harms or costs. No new direct harms or costs identified with these guidelines.

Association of induced abortion with preterm birth risk in first-time mothers

Women who have previously had an induced abortion (IA) before their first birth have been associated with preterm birth (PTB). However, previous studies on the PTB are inconsistent. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the association between IA and PTB and low birth weight (LBW) for first-time mothers. A total of 3,684 Southern Chinese women who gave birth for the first time to a live singleton infants were recruited between January 2015 and December 2015 in the province of Guangdong, China. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine whether IA was associated with PTB and LBW. Previous IA was not associated with increased risks of PTB or LBW, adjusted odds ratios were 0.80 (95% CI = 0.53 to 1.20) and 0.86 (95% CI = 0.57 to 1.31), respectively. Additionally, no significant associations were observed for infants born at before 37, before 32, and before 28 gestational weeks. And no significant associations were also observed for LBW measuring lower than 2500 grams and also measuring lower than 1500 grams. Our study suggested that a previous IA, as compared with women who reported no previous IA, does not increase the risk of PTB or LBW in subsequent pregnancy for the first-time mothers among Southern Chinese women.

Effect of induced abortions on early preterm births and adverse perinatal outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between prior induced abortions and prematurity and to explore potential mechanisms for a relationship, including second trimester pregnancy losses and infections.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the records of all women who delivered between April 2001 and March 2006 using data from the McGill Obstetric and Neonatal Database. Exposure was categorized as having had no prior induced abortions, one prior induced abortion, or two or more prior induced abortions. Our primary outcome was gestational age at delivery, categorized as < 24 weeks, < 26 weeks, < 28 weeks, < 32 weeks and < 37 weeks. Secondary outcomes were intrapartum fever, NICU admission, and use of tocolysis.

RESULTS

A total of 17 916 women were included in the study. Of these 2276 (13%) had undergone one prior induced abortion, and 862 (5%) had undergone two or more prior induced abortions. Women with a prior induced abortion were more likely to be smokers and to consume alcohol, and were less likely to be married. Women who reported one prior induced abortion were more likely to have premature births by 32, 28, and 26 weeks; adjusted odds ratios were 1.45 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.90), 1.71 (95% CI 1.21 to 2.42), and 2.17 (95% CI 1.41 to 3.35), respectively. This association was stronger for women with two or more previous induced abortions. Prior induced abortion was associated with an increased requirement for tocolysis in subsequent pregnancies, but there was no association between prior induced abortions and NICU admission, intrapartum fever, and preterm premature rupture of membranes.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a significant increase in the risk of preterm delivery in women with a history of previous induced abortion. This association was stronger with decreasing gestational age.

Modelling prior reproductive history to improve prediction of risk for very preterm birth

In published studies of preterm birth, analyses have usually been centred on individual reproductive events and do not account for the joint distributions of these events. In particular, spontaneous and induced abortions have often been studied separately and have been variously reported as having no increased risk, increased risk or different risks for subsequent preterm birth. In order to address this inconsistency, we categorised women into mutually exclusive groups according to their reproductive history, and explored the range of risks associated with different reproductive histories and assessed similarities of risks between different pregnancy histories. The data were from a population-based case-control study, conducted in Victoria, Australia. The study recruited women giving birth between April 2002 and April 2004 from 73 maternity hospitals. Detailed reproductive histories were collected by interview a few weeks after the birth. The cases were 603 women who had had a singleton birth between 20 and less than 32 weeks gestation (very preterm births including terminations of pregnancy) and the controls were 796 randomly selected women from the population who had had a singleton birth of at least 37 completed weeks gestation. All birth outcomes were included. Unconditional logistic regression was used to assess the association of very preterm birth with type and number of prior abortions, prior preterm births and sociodemographic factors. Using the complex combinations of prior pregnancy experiences of women (including nulligravidity), we showed that a history of prior childbirth (at term) with no preterm births gave the lowest risk of very preterm birth. With this group as the reference category, odds ratios of more than two were associated with all other prior reproductive histories. There was no evidence of difference in risk between types of abortion (i.e. spontaneous or induced) although the risk increased if a prior preterm birth had also occurred. There was an increasing risk of very preterm birth associated with increasing numbers of abortions. This method of data analysis reveals consistent and similar risks for very preterm birth following spontaneous or induced abortions. The findings point to the need to explore commonalities rather than differences in regard to the impact of abortion on subsequent births.

Abortion in adolescents: epidemiology, confidentiality, and methods

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the epidemiology, confidentiality, and methods of abortion provision specific to adolescents.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the United States, four out of five pregnancies in teenagers are unintended and about one-third of all adolescent pregnancies end in induced abortion. Barriers such as travel and cost decrease abortion access for all women and adolescents, whose pregnancies are diagnosed later than older women, may be particularly impacted by such challenges. An increasing majority of states require parental involvement in adolescents' decisions to end their pregnancies. Recent analyses indicate that mandating parental involvement does not promote family communication; rather, such laws may actually increase the risk of harm by delaying appropriate medical care. Medication and surgical abortion are options for adolescents; both are safe and effective. There is no evidence that abortion during adolescence causes negative psychological consequences, decreased fertility, or increased risk in future pregnancies.

SUMMARY

Continued high rates of unintended pregnancy among US adolescents necessitate access to safe and timely abortion services. Unfortunately, teens encounter unique barriers in obtaining abortion care that lead to delays and preventable risk associated with later abortion.

Cervical dilation in second-trimester abortion

Dilation and evacuation, the most common method performed for second-trimester abortion in the United States, requires sufficient cervical dilation to reduce the risk of complications such as cervical laceration or uterine perforation. The cervix may be prepared with osmotic dilators such as laminaria, Lamicel, or Dilapan-S, or with pharmacologic agents such as misoprostol. Dilapan-S and Lamicel achieve their maximum dilation faster than laminaria, making same-day procedures possible. Misoprostol has limited data supporting its use in this setting. Decisions regarding which method is best are clinician-dependent, and factors such as gestational age and time allowed for preparation should be considered.

Sequelae of induced abortion

In the long-term prospective controlled study reported here, 1509 general practitioners and 795 gynaecologists in England, Scotland and Wales are cooperating in providing information on the sequelae of abortion, especially on the problems of later pregnancies, subfertility and all reported morbidity, in particular psychiatric illness. Morbidity within 21 days after induced abortion, and considered to be related to induced abortion, was found in 10% of 6105 women who had an induced abortion in their index pregnancy, and there were major complications in 2.1%. The main factors affecting morbidity were the place of operation, gestation at termination, the method of termination, sterilization at the time of operation, and smoking habits. Several differences between National Health Service and private sector operations were found which could affect the morbidity rates. Possible means of reducing early morbidity are discussed. The outcome of the first post-index pregnancy in 745 women whose index pregnancy had ended in induced abortion and in 1339 controls was also compared. There was no statistically significant difference between cases and controls. Further analysis of a large number of pregnancies is required to permit confident interpretation of these observations.

[A study comparing previous induced abortion rates in populations of newly delivered women and infertile women]

OBJECTIVE

For years, induced abortions (IA) have been deemed responsible for altered fertility. The implication of various mechanisms including tubal infertility, intra-uterine adhesions, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy, cervical incompetence, shortened gestations, and any psychological trouble leading to anovulation has been raised. Though many authors find no evidence of an increased risk on fertility for women, whose IA is not complicated by infection, it might sometimes be insinuated that infertility is the consequence of previous abortion. Thus, we compared the rate of patients with any prior IA in a population of newly delivered women and in women ongoing IVF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at Sèvres hospital, comparing two populations of women, newly delivered women (n=1738) between January 1st and December 31st 2005, and women ongoing IVF at the same period (n=430). We reported the number of previous medical or surgical induced abortions and compared it in both groups. Another analysis compared these rates, among two subgroups of women with one or more prior pregnancy (secondary infertility (n=148), and secondary gestation (n=1088).

RESULTS

The rate of prior IA was not different in the two populations. In the IVF group, 13% (n=56) had undergone one or more IA, versus 16.7% (n=291) in the newly delivered group (P=0.06). Among women with previous pregnancy, 37.8% (56) women of the IVF group had undergone one or more previous IA, versus 26.7% (291) of the newly delivered women (P=0.007).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

As expected by literature data on IA and fertility, rates of prior induced abortions were not different in the population of fertile women versus infertile. However, women with one or more previous pregnancy are more likely to have undergone previous IA in the IVF group than in the newly delivered group, possibly due to a bias of age. More data are requested to eliminate linkage between IA and infertility.

Cervical length for prediction of preterm birth in women with multiple prior induced abortions

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether transvaginal sonographic cervical length predicts preterm birth in women with multiple prior induced abortions.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Thomas Jefferson University Prematurity Database. Patients with a singleton pregnancy and a history of more than one induced abortion were identified. Exclusion criteria were cerclage and indicated preterm birth. Subjects were followed with transvaginal ultrasound measurement of the cervix between 14 and 24 weeks' gestation and grouped into those with and those without a short cervix; a cervical length of < 25 mm was considered short. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth at < 35 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifteen of the 65 (23%) women with more than one induced abortion included in the study had a short cervix. The demographics and risk factors were similar between those with and those without a short cervix. The overall incidence of preterm birth was 21.5% (14/65); in women with a short cervix the incidence was 47% (7/15) and in women without a short cervix it was 14% (7/50). The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of a short cervix in the prediction of preterm birth were 50%, 84%, 47% and 86%, respectively. The relative risk of a short cervix for spontaneous preterm birth was 3.3 (95% CI, 1.4-7.4).

CONCLUSION

A cervical length of < 25 mm on transvaginal ultrasound is predictive of preterm birth in women with more than one prior induced abortion. Women with multiple prior induced abortions and a short cervix have a 3.3-fold greater chance of spontaneous preterm birth compared with those with a cervical length of > or = 25mm.

Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks of gestation

Roughly 11% of induced abortions in the United States are performed after 14 weeks of gestation, most commonly by dilation and evacuation (D&E). For a D&E procedure, the cervix must be dilated sufficiently to allow passage of operative instruments and products of conception without injuring the uterus or cervical canal. Preoperative preparation of the cervix reduces the risk of cervical laceration and uterine perforation. The cervix may be prepared with osmotic dilators, prostaglandin analogues, or both. Osmotic dilators currently available in the United States include Dilapan-S, Lamicel, and laminaria. Laminaria tents are made from dehydrated seaweed and require 12-24 h to achieve greatest dilation. The synthetic products, Dilapan-S and Lamicel, achieve maximum effect within 6 h. Dilapan-S achieves greater dilation than the others and, thus, requires fewer dilators to be placed but may be more difficult to remove. For same day procedures, Dilapan-S and Lamicel are preferable to laminaria. A single set of one to several dilators is usually adequate for D&E before 20 weeks of gestation. Additional sets over 1-2 days may be needed in challenging cases. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin analogue, is sometimes used instead of osmotic dilators; however, the data to support such use are limited. Misoprostol is inferior to overnight dilation with laminaria for cervical priming prior to D&E. Misoprostol use as an adjunct to overnight osmotic dilation is only marginally beneficial for priming beyond 16 weeks and does not truly demonstrate any benefit before 19 weeks of gestation. Limited data demonstrate the safety of misoprostol prior to D&E in patients with a uterine scar. The Society of Family Planning recommends preoperative cervical preparation to decrease the risk of complications when performing a D&E prior to 20 weeks of gestation. The three currently available osmotic dilators (laminaria, Lamicel, and Dilapan-S) are safe and effective for this use. Since no single protocol has been found to be superior, clinical judgment is warranted when selecting a method of preoperative cervical preparation.

Induced abortion and risk of small-for-gestational-age birth

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the possibility of an association between previous induced abortion and subsequent birth of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

General and university hospitals.

METHODS

Cases were 555 women who delivered SGA babies. Controls were 1966 women who gave birth at term (>37 weeks of gestation) to healthy infants of normal weight on randomly selected days at the hospital where cases had been identified. All women in the case and control categories were interviewed on the obstetric wards by one of a team of six interviewers. During the interviews, information was obtained regarding general socio-demographic factors, personal characteristics and habits, gynaecological and obstetric history, general anamnesis, family history of obstetric and gynaecological diseases, and the age of the father of the child. Further information on current pregnancy and delivery was also collected. We used conditional multiple logistic regression (with age as the matching variable), with maximum likelihood fitting, to obtain odds ratios and their corresponding 95% CIs. Included in the regression equations were terms for education, plus terms significantly associated in this data set with the risk of SGA birth (smoking in pregnancy, history of SGA, gestational hypertension and parity).

POPULATION

Women admitted to a general and a university hospital.

RESULTS

No significant increase in the risk of SGA birth was observed in women with a previous induced abortion [odds ratio (OR) 1.0; 95% CI 0.6-1.7]. The OR for SGA birth was 1.2 (95% CI 0.7-2.1) for preterm and 1.0 (95% CI 0.7-1.4) for term SGA births.

CONCLUSION

This study found no association between risk of SGA birth and induced abortion.

Previous induced abortions and the risk of very preterm delivery: results of the EPIPAGE study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk of very preterm birth (22-32 weeks of gestation) associated with previous induced abortion according to the complications leading to very preterm delivery in singletons.

DESIGN

Multicentre, case-control study (the French EPIPAGE study).

SETTING

Regionally defined population of births in France.

SAMPLE

The sample consisted of 1943 very preterm live-born singletons (< 33 weeks of gestation), 276 moderate preterm live-born singletons (33-34 weeks) and 618 unmatched full-term controls (39-40 weeks).

METHODS

Data from the EPIPAGE study were analysed using polytomous logistic regression models to control for social and demographic characteristics, lifestyle habits during pregnancy and obstetric history. The main mechanisms of preterm delivery were classified as gestational hypertension, antepartum haemorrhage, fetal growth restriction, premature rupture of membranes, idiopathic preterm labor and other causes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Odds ratios for very preterm birth by gestational age and by pregnancy complications leading to preterm delivery associated with a history of induced abortion.

RESULTS

Women with a history of induced abortion were at higher risk of very preterm delivery than those with no such history (OR + 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0); the risk was even higher for extremely preterm deliveries (< 28 weeks). The association between previous induced abortion and very preterm delivery varied according to the main complications leading to very preterm delivery. A history of induced abortion was associated with an increased risk of premature rupture of the membranes, antepartum haemorrhage (not in association with hypertension) and idiopathic spontaneous preterm labour that occur at very small gestational ages (< 28 weeks). Conversely, no association was found between induced abortion and very preterm delivery due to hypertension.

CONCLUSION

Previous induced abortion was associated with an increased risk of very preterm delivery. The strength of the association increased with decreasing gestational age.

Mifepristone-induced early abortion and outcome of subsequent wanted pregnancy

Follow-up information on subsequent pregnancies after mifepristone (RU486)-induced abortion is scarce. The authors examined whether one mifepristone-induced first-trimester abortion affects the outcome of a subsequent wanted pregnancy. In a study conducted in 1998-2001 at antenatal clinics in Beijing, Chengdu, and Shanghai, China, the authors enrolled 4,925 women with no history of induced abortion, 4,931 women with one previous mifepristone-induced abortion, and 4,800 women with one previous surgical abortion and followed them through pregnancy and childbirth. The adjusted odds ratio for preterm delivery in women with one mifepristone abortion compared with women with no abortion was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.61, 0.98). Although the mean birth weight of infants born to women with mifepristone abortion was 33 g (95% confidence interval: 17, 49) higher than that of infants born to women with no abortion, the frequencies of low birth weight and mean lengths of pregnancy were similar. There were no significant differences in risk of preterm delivery, frequency of low birth weight, or mean infant birth weight in the comparisons of women with previous mifepristone abortion and women with surgical abortion. This study suggests that one early abortion induced by mifepristone in nulliparous women has no adverse effects on the outcome of a subsequent pregnancy.

History of fetal loss and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in relation to subsequent risk of preterm delivery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between maternal reproductive history and preterm delivery.

METHODS

The 312 preterm delivery cases, studied in aggregate, and in subgroups (spontaneous preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, medically induced preterm delivery, moderate preterm delivery [gestational age at delivery 34-36 weeks], and very preterm delivery [gestational age at delivery <34 weeks]), were compared with 424 randomly selected women who delivered at term. Maternal medical records provided information on maternal reproductive history, pregnancy outcome, as well as sociodemographic characteristics. Using multivariate logistic regression, we derived maximum likelihood estimates of adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A history of 2+ miscarriages was (OR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.2-3.9), but a history of 2+ prior induced abortions (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 0.7-2.0) was not, associated with preterm delivery in the index pregnancy. Analyses of preterm delivery subgroups indicated that a history of 2+ miscarriages was associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm labor (OR = 2.6; 95% CI 1.2-2.8), preterm premature rupture of membrane (OR = 1.8; 95% 0.7-4.4), and medically induced preterm delivery (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 0.8-4.2), though only the former approached statistical significance. Excess risk of preterm delivery was associated with maternal prior history of delivering a stillborn infant (OR = 10.7), a prior history of delivering a newborn that later died during the neonatal period (OR = 3.2), and a prior history of having a pregnancy complicated by spontaneous preterm delivery (OR = 6.0). Generally these associations were evident for each subgroup of preterm delivery, though inferences were often hindered by our relatively small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the hypothesis that maternal adverse reproductive history is associated with an increased risk of preterm labor and delivery.

Risk factors in miscarriage: a review

Miscarriage is one of the most frequent problems in human pregnancy. The most widely accepted definition is that proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1977. The incidence among clinical pregnancies is about 12-15% but including early pregnancy losses it is 17-22%. The only two etiologic factors recognized by all authors are uterine malformations and parental balanced chromosomal rearrangements. There have been many other suggested risk factors. In this revision we discuss these.

Surgical abortion

This review of surgically-induced abortion focuses on conventional first trimester suction evacuation. Manual vacuum aspiration at early gestations and dilatation and evacuation at more advanced gestation are also considered. The place of surgical abortion in contemporary abortion practice is reviewed alongside developments in medical abortion. There is still debate about the best method for later abortions. Patient choice and pre-procedure assessment are considered fundamental to practice. The importance of antibiotic prophylaxis or infection screening is highlighted. The value of ultrasound emerges. The need for cervical priming is considered along with choice of suitable pharmacological agents. Current practice and the procedure of surgical abortion is outlined. Complications and strategies to minimize risk are detailed. The overview concludes with consideration of the impact on future reproductive health.

Epidemiology of preterm deliveries in Southeast Brazil: a hospital-based study

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the role of some factors in the genesis of preterm deliveries in Southeast Brazil. METHODS: a cohort hospital-based study of 589 mothers who delivered in Taubaté, a middle-size city in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, between May 1, and October 31, 1999. The statistical approach was Risk Ratio with statistical significance established at alpha: 5%. RESULTS: 70 preterm newborns were identified representing 11,9% of the total birth rate. The variables holding statistical significance were: previous history of stillbirth delivery, smoking during pregnancy, poor weight gain, arterial hypertension, vaginal bleeding, genitourinary tract infection and five or less medical visits for prenatal care. CONCLUSIONS: this study indicates that good quality prenatal care has a great value in preventing preterm births, for poor weight gain, arterial hypertension, vaginal bleeding, genitourinary tract infection and smoking are conditions that can be controlled in the course of pregnancy.

Impact of induced abortions on subsequent pregnancy outcome: the 1995 French national perinatal survey

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of previous induced abortions on preterm delivery, small for gestational age and low birthweight in subsequent pregnancies.

DESIGN

Survey of a national sample of births in France in 1995.

SETTING

All public and private maternity hospitals in France.

POPULATION

12,432 women who had a singleton live birth during one week.

METHODS

Data were collected during the women's postpartum stay in hospital, partly obtained by interview and partly abstracted from hospital medical records. Rates of preterm delivery, small for gestational age and low birthweight were compared according to existence and number of previous induced abortions. Maternal age, parity, history of previous adverse pregnancy outcome, maternal weight before pregnancy, marital status, educational level, maternal employment status during pregnancy, nationality, smoking during the third trimester of pregnancy and antenatal care were controlled for using multiple logistic regression and polytomous logistic regression.

RESULTS

Twelve percent of women reported one previous induced abortion, and 3% two or more. Previous induced abortion was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8); the risk of preterm delivery increased with the number of previous induced abortions (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.7 for one previous abortion and OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2-2.8 for two or more). The relationship was the same for very preterm and moderately preterm deliveries and for spontaneous and indicated preterm deliveries. After controlling for potential confounders, the association between previous induced abortions and small for gestational age and low birthweight infants was no longer significant.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that a history of induced abortion increases the risk of preterm delivery, particularly for women who have had repeated abortions. The respective role of the surgical and medical techniques used for induced abortions needs to be explored.

Risk factors for spontaneous preterm birth in two urban areas of Ukraine

The economic, social and health problems faced by former eastern bloc countries after the demise of the Soviet Union are unique in the recent history of Europe. We conducted a study in two urban areas of Ukraine, asking if the traditional predictors of preterm delivery continue to be associated with risk under these conditions. Subjects were pregnant women with last menstrual period (LMP) between 25 December 1992 and 23 July 1994. Self-completed questionnaires and the medical record provided data. We compared 137 spontaneous preterm deliveries with 2,886 full-term births, using all established risk factors for which we had data. Maternal age was the variable most strongly related to preterm birth. Being 18 or less had an odds ratio (OR) of 3.7; being 30+ had an OR of 2.5 relative to the reference group of age 25-29. Placental complications and pre-existing hypertension had ORs of 2.7 and 2.3, respectively, but the confidence interval included 1.0. Low net pregnancy weight gain (less than 10 kg) was significantly associated with preterm birth, but the rate of net weight gain was not. Marital status and educational category were only weakly related. We conclude that although Ukraine faced serious difficulties during its transition to a market economy, these problems did not generally alter the outcome of pregnancy in our sample when the classic risk factors for preterm delivery were present.

Induced abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy and risk of miscarriage

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the relation between induced abortion and risk of subsequent miscarriage.

DESIGN

Case-control study conducted between February 1990 and May 1995.

PARTICIPANTS

Case group included 782 women (median age 32 years, range 14-46) admitted for spontaneous abortion (within the 12th week of gestation) to a network of obstetric departments in the greater Milan area. The control group was recruited among women who gave birth at term (> 37 weeks of gestation) to healthy infants on randomly selected days at the hospitals where cases had been identified. A total of 1543 controls (median age 30 years, range 14-45) were interviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 102 cases (13%) and 181 controls (12%) reported one or more induced abortions. No clear relation emerged between miscarriage and induced abortions. In comparison with women reporting no induced abortion the odds ratio (OR) for miscarriage were 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.4) in women reporting one induced abortion and 0.9 (95% CI 0.4-1.8) in women reporting two or more. Likewise, there was no association between time since last and age at first induced abortion and risk of miscarriage.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find any strong association between induced and spontaneous abortion.

Selection bias in a study on how women experienced induced abortion

OBJECTIVE

One third of the women who had an induced abortion at the department of gynecology and obstetrics in Malmö 1989 refused to participate in an interview a year later to explore their experience and the care they had received. Using data from the mandatory preoperative visit it was then possible to compare participants with non-participants with regard to socio-demographic characteristics. reproductive history and stated reason for abortion. By continued follow-up of medical records it has furthermore been possible to ascertain how many women conceived within a year, and how many of them applied for another abortion and how many elected to continue the pregnancy to term.

SETTING

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö Sweden. This is the sole referral hospital serving the population of Malmö (approx. 230000).

SUBJECTS

All 1285 women who underwent induced abortion at the department in 1989. +

STUDY DESIGN

In each case information on socio-demographic characteristics, reproductive history and stated reasons for abortion was collected at the mandatory clinical visit prior to the abortion. This information was used for comparison of participants and non-participants in the planned 1-year follow-up interview.

RESULTS

Young, unmarried women of low educational status and without full-time employment or studying were overrepresented in the non-participant group. The proportion of women with children was however smaller in that group. Within 12 months after the abortion, 118 women 66 (7.7%) of the participants in the follow-up interview and 52 (12%) of the non-participants conceived again but elected to continue the pregnancy to term (P<0.05). whereas 124 of the women 80 (9.5%) and 44 (10.2%) of the respective subgroups again applied for abortion within 12 months.

CONCLUSION

One third of the women who underwent induced abortion did not wish to be interviewed about their emotional and somatic experience of the abortion 1 year later. Non-participation at the follow-up interview was associated with socio-demographic factors which in studies about other medical problems have been shown to be associated with increased vulnerability and morbidity. Non-participation was also associated with an increased childbirth rate during the following 2 years. The large proportion of non-participants is a matter for concern as to some extent it reflects inability of the health care system to establish trustful relationships with these women. How the participants in the follow-up study experienced this relationship will soon be published in our next paper. Support from the women's surroundings and the adviser the women met at the public health care system clearly influenced the women's psychological reactions after the abortion. It is therefore important to ascertain to what extent the management of abortion applicants in fact fulfils their individual needs and expectations.

Prior pregnancy outcome and the risk of intraamniotic infection in the following pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine whether the outcome of a prior pregnancy influenced the risk of intraamniotic infection in the following pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control study was conducted at five King County, Washington, hospitals from 1990 through 1994. Cases (n = 585) of intraamniotic infection were identified by a medical record review for clinical signs of infection during labor and compared with controls (n = 575). Women were classified as having a spontaneous abortion or elective termination if the pregnancy had been diagnosed by a health care professional before 20 weeks and was verified by medical record review. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Women with spontaneous abortion (odds ratio = 4.3; 95% confidence interval 2.9 to 6.4) or elective termination (odds ratio = 4.0; 95% confidence interval 2.7 to 5.8) had an increased risk of intraamniotic infection. The increased risk was similar for women who did and did not have an earlier pregnancy carried beyond 20 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who have had a spontaneous abortion or an elective termination have an increased risk of intraamniotic infection regardless of previous successful pregnancy outcome.

O impacto do aborto ilegal na saúde reprodutiva: sugestões para melhorar a qualidade do dado básico e viabilizar essa análise

Estatísticas fidedignas sobre o aborto provocado, provenientes de países em que essa prática é legalizada, permitem uma adequada avaliação do impacto do aborto na Saúde Reprodutiva. Paradoxalmente, é justamente nesses países que observam-se os menores danos à Saúde da Mulher enquanto que, mesmo pautando-se em dados pouco ou nada confiáveis, o custo da prática clandestina é altíssimo: suas sequelas são bastante frequentes e, não raras vezes, levam ao óbito. Avaliar-se o quão alto é este custo, contudo, é uma tarefa bastante árdua e, infelizmente, dependendo do enfoque desejado pode até ser inexequível. A solução mais acertada para a resolução desse dilema seria, a julgar pela literatura especializada, legalizar-se o aborto. Nessa eventualidade, além de se reduzir, automaticamente, os custos da prática clandestina, a análise do dueto Aborto/ Saúde, por si, permitiria remover os custos remanecentes.Mas, enquanto se convive com uma legislação restritiva, a solução mais sensata, é buscar otimizar a qualidade de análise daquele dueto. Nesse sentido, pode-se recorrer à adoção de uma técnica estatística que remove o maior dos entraves na determinação da dinâmica do aborto ilegal - a saber, a sub-declaração e/ou sub-registro da frequência de recorrência ao aborto -, a TRA; bem como elaborar-se estudos populacionais, a partir de um plano de amostragem simplificado, sobretudo por serem raríssimos frente aos estudos baseados em dados hospitalares, apesar de fornecerem informações bem mais amplas sobre a dinâmica do aborto.

Medical abortion or vacuum aspiration? Two year follow up of a patient preference trial

OBJECTIVE

To describe and compare health outcomes two years after medical abortion or vacuum aspiration in women recruited into a patient preference trial during 1990 to 1991.

DESIGN

Women recruited to the original, partially randomised study were contacted for assessment using a structured interview.

SETTING

Grampian region of Scotland, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and forty women who had participated in a partially randomised study of first trimester abortion two years previously.

INTERVENTION

Vacuum aspiration or medical abortion using mifepristone and gemeprost.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Long-term general, reproductive and psychological health; acceptability of procedure; perceived value of choice of method of termination.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between women who had undergone medical abortion or vacuum aspiration two years previously in general, reproductive or psychological health. Almost all women placed a high value on the provision of choice of method of termination. There was a significant difference in perception of long term procedure acceptability among women who had been randomised to a method of termination.

CONCLUSIONS

Women should have the opportunity to choose the method of termination. This opportunity will result in high levels of acceptability, particularly at gestations under 50 days of amenorrhoea.

Multiple induced abortions: Danish experience

Experience with 50 first time aborters, 50 second time aborters, and 50 third time aborters residing in an urban area of Copenhagen suggests that women having a repeat abortion are more similar than dissimilar to women having a first induced abortion. There were no differences in socioeconomic status, educational level, or stated reasons for choosing abortion (usually socioeconomic and family considerations). Though similar to first and second time aborters in their life situations and greater contraceptive risk-taking, third timers seemed to become pregnant more readily. They were also less willing to be interviewed. Related studies and suggestions for postabortion counseling are discussed.

Reproductive history and the risk of neonatal sepsis

It was recently suggested that a previous abortion increases the risk of intrapartum infection in a following pregnancy. The authors hypothesised that abortion also could be associated with a higher risk of neonatal sepsis. A case-control study of neonatal sepsis was conducted using the Washington State Birth Registry. Cases of sepsis were selected among singleton livebirths during the period 1984-90, and compared with a control group for the occurrence of spontaneous or induced abortion in previous pregnancies. The risk estimates were calculated using a stratified analysis. After exclusion of primigravidae, the age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.68, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33, 2.11 for previous spontaneous abortion, and 2.20 (95% CI 1.73, 2.79) for induced abortion, compared with previous livebirth. After exclusion of nulliparous women, the OR decreased to 1.19 (95% CI 0.90, 1.58) for spontaneous abortion and 1.45 (95% CI 1.03, 2.04) for induced abortion. After controlling for the effect of parity, induced abortion is associated with an increased risk of neonatal sepsis in a subsequent pregnancy, but the association between spontaneous abortion and sepsis is small and non-significant. The authors suggest that the procedures involved in a therapeutic abortion might produce a latent, sub-clinical infection that persists until the next pregnancy, and is then transmitted to the newborn.

Past obstetric history of the mother and its association with low birthweight of a subsequent child: a population based study

A total population sample of 7286 multigravidae from the Greek National Perinatal Survey (April 1983) was used to determine the association between maternal obstetric history and low birthweight of the subsequent singleton delivery. Significant associations were found with previous early and late fetal losses (miscarriages, induced abortions, stillbirths) and history of haemorrhage during a prior pregnancy. It was found that mothers who had experienced miscarriage(s), induced abortion(s) or stillbirth(s) had relative risks (RRs) of 1.65, 1.81 and 3.59 respectively compared with mothers without any fetal loss. The risk increased substantially with the increasing number of losses and reached 8.83 for the small group of mothers who had experienced all three kinds of fetal loss. For mothers with a history of bleeding in a previous pregnancy the risk was double that of mothers without such a history. The results above were changed only slightly when the significant socio-economic characteristics of the family were taken into account.

The epidemiology of preterm birth

Secular trends in the prevalence of preterm birth and international comparisons of the rates of preterm birth are difficult to interpret because of differences, both formal and informal, in the registration of extremely preterm births. Accurate estimation of gestational age is another problem in the measurement of preterm birth. Preterm birth is heterogeneous in several ways. It is heterogeneous in terms of the extent to which the birth is preterm (20-27 weeks, 28-31 weeks or 32-36 weeks of gestation); in whether the birth was elective or spontaneous; and among spontaneous idiopathic preterm births, in whether there was preterm labour or premature rupture of the membranes. Case-control study designs taking account of these subgroups have been a recent feature of epidemiologic approaches. The classic social associations of preterm birth--low socioeconomic status, extremes of maternal age, primiparity, being unmarried--apply to extremely preterm and moderately preterm births as well as to the mildly preterm group. The strength of these associations is small compared with factors in the prior reproductive history and with medical and obstetric complications of the current pregnancy. Recent epidemiological research activities have focused on the ways in which risk factors such as physical workload, drugs and alcohol, lack of social support and infection might be mediating factors between sociodemographic status and preterm birth. As Eastman (1947) pointed out almost 50 years ago, 'only when the factors causing prematurity are clearly understood can any intelligent attempt at prevention be made'.

The effect of induced abortion on subsequent fertility

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of induced abortion on subsequent fertility.

DESIGN

1. Prospective cohort study of women who had an unplanned pregnancy at recruitment. 2. Retrospective study of women who had a planned pregnancy at recruitment.

SETTING

Joint Royal College of General Practitioners/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists study based in general practice in England, Scotland and Wales, between 1976 and 1987.

SUBJECTS

1. Prospective study: Four hundred and thirty-three women with a recruitment unplanned pregnancy ending in induced abortion (abortion group) and 1035 women with a recruitment unplanned pregnancy which ended naturally (nonabortion group). All subsequently had a planned pregnancy, or were known to be trying to conceive at some point during the follow-up. 2. Retrospective study: Nine thousand two hundred and ninety-nine women who presented at recruitment with a planned pregnancy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The women's estimated length of planning time, expressed as a fertility rate ratio.

RESULTS

Induced abortion was not related to future fertility. In the prospective study, the fertility rate ratio (FRR) of the abortion group relative to the nonabortion group was 0.94 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.07, P = 0.37). This result was supported by the retrospective study, which again showed no important difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Induced abortion does not appear to have an important effect on future fertility.

Induced abortions, miscarriages, and tobacco smoking as risk factors for secondary infertility

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim was to determine whether induced abortions could increase the risk of secondary infertility.

DESIGN

This was a case-control study; cases were women with secondary infertility, individually matched to two controls who were currently pregnant. Each participant was interviewed by one of two medical doctors using a questionnaire that sought information on their demographic, socioeconomic, medical, and reproductive status. The data were analysed by conditional logistic regression.

SETTING

The study took place in the Alexandra Maternity Hospital in Athens, Greece, in 1987-88.

PARTICIPANTS

84 women consecutively admitted with secondary infertility and 168 pregnant controls took part.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight cases and no controls reported a previous ectopic pregnancy, confirming that the occurrence of a pregnancy of this type dramatically increases the risk of secondary infertility. Furthermore, the occurrence of either induced abortions or spontaneous abortions independently and significantly increased the risk of subsequent development of secondary infertility. The logistic regression adjusted relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals) for secondary infertility were 2.1 (1.1-4.0) when there was one previous induced abortion and 2.3 (1.0-5.3) when there were two previous induced abortions. Tobacco smoking significantly increased the risk of secondary infertility, the adjusted relative risk being 3.0 (1.3-6.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Legalised induced abortions, as currently practised in Greece, appear to increase slightly the relative risk of secondary infertility.

Low birth weight in relation to multiple induced abortions

BACKGROUND

Most studies report that a single induced abortion does not increase risk for delivering a low birth weight infant in a subsequent pregnancy. However, the effect of multiple abortions has not been adequately evaluated.

METHODS

This relationship was studied in 6541 White women who delivered their first child between 1984 and 1987. We compared the frequencies of low birth weight (less than 2500 g) among infants born to 1999 women without prior induced abortion and 1999 women with one abortion with the frequencies of low birth weight among infants born to women with two (n = 1850), three (n = 520), and four or more (n = 173) prior induced abortions.

RESULTS

After adjustment for confounding variables, we found no linear relationship in risk of low birth weight among women with one (relative risk [RR] = 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9-1.5), two (RR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.0), three (RR = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.8-1.9), or four or more (RR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.9-2.9) prior induced abortions.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm earlier reports of little or no evidence of harmful effects on birth weight by one or by two or more induced abortions. We further report that risk is not significantly elevated even in women with three, four, or more prior terminations of pregnancy when compared with women with one or two abortions.

The effect of induced abortion on subsequent pregnancy outcome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of induced abortion on the outcome of the next pregnancy.

DESIGN

Long-term prospective controlled cohort study.

SETTING

Joint Royal College of General Practitioners/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists study based in general practice in England, Scotland and Wales.

SUBJECTS

1311 women whose recruitment pregnancy had ended in induced abortion (the abortion group) and 2131 women whose recruitment pregnancy had a natural conclusion (the non-abortion group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Non-viable outcome (spontaneous or missed miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy or stillbirth), birthweight, length of gestation.

RESULTS

Induced abortion was not materially associated with any of the three measures of adverse outcome. Compared with the non-abortion group the relative risk of a non-viable outcome in the abortion group was 1.01 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.27). In the abortion group birthweight was an average 23 g lighter (95% CI -76 g to + 30 g) and length of gestation an average 0.9 days shorter (95% CI -2.2 days to + 0.4 days) than in the non-abortion group. Women who had their abortions in NHS premises had an increased risk of a non-viable outcome (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.31 to 4.94) and had babies with significantly lower mean birthweight (-119 g, 95% CI -233 g to +5 g) compared with those who obtained their operations in the private sector. Women whose abortion had been carried out by a consultant had the lowest risk of non-viable outcome. Although these differences remained after adjustment for a number of important variables, it is possible that factors not measured in the present study, such as economic status and occupation, played a contributory role.

CONCLUSION

Overall, induced abortion was not associated with any important effect on the three measures of adverse outcome in the subsequent pregnancy.