A protocol using a low dose of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist might be the best protocol for patients with high follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations on day 3

Long-term GnRH agonist pretreatment before frozen embryo transfer improves pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles following long-term gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) pretreatment have better pregnancy outcomes than fresh embryo transfer cycles with long or ultra-long GnRHa protocol in these patients?

DESIGN

This study included 537 women with adenomyosis divided into three groups: (Group A) FET cycles following long-term GnRHa pretreatment (192 patients); (Group B) fresh embryo transfer cycles with the ultra-long GnRHa protocol (241 patients); (Group C) fresh embryo transfer cycles with the long GnRHa protocol (104 patients).

RESULTS

The total gonadotrophin dose and stimulation duration were significantly lower in Group A than in Groups B and C. The implantation and live birth rates were significantly higher in Group A than in Groups B and C. In the long-term GnRHa pretreatment and FET treatment of Group A, implantation (odds ratio [OR] 1.729, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.073-2.788, P = 0.025), clinical pregnancy (OR 1.665, 95% CI 1.032-2.686, P = 0.037) and live birth rates (OR 1.694, 95% CI 1.045-2.746, P = 0.033) increased and miscarriage rate (OR 0.203, 95% CI 0.078-0.530, P = 0.001) decreased when compared with Group C. Comparison of Groups A and B showed that with the long-term GnRHa pretreatment, FET was a protective factor for live birth rate (OR 1.350, 95% CI 1.017-1.792, P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

FET following long-term GnRHa pretreatment has a better IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome, and a potential benefit in terms of a lower gonadotrophin dose, and a shorter stimulation duration than fresh embryo transfer combined with a long or ultra-long GnRHa protocol.

Pregnancy outcome of "delayed start" GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders: A clinical trial study

BACKGROUND

Management of poor-responding patients is still major challenge in assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Delayed-start GnRH antagonist protocol is recommended to these patients, but little is known in this regards.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was assessment of delayed-start GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized clinical trial included sixty infertile women with Bologna criteria for ovarian poor responders who were candidate for IVF. In case group (n=30), delayed-start GnRH antagonist protocol administered estrogen priming followed by early follicular-phase GnRH antagonist treatment for 7 days before ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin. Control group (n=30) treated with estrogen priming antagonist protocol. Finally, endometrial thickness, the rates of oocytes maturation, , embryo formation, and pregnancy were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Rates of implantation, chemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy in delayed-start cycles were higher although was not statistically significant. Endometrial thickness was significantly higher in case group. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of oocyte maturation, embryo formation, and IVF outcomes between two groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference between delayed-start GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol.

A novel approach using a minimal number of injections during the IVF/ICSI cycle: Luteal half-dose depot GnRH agonist following corifollitropin alfa versus the corifollitropin alfa with a GnRH-antagonist cycle

OBJECTIVE

Corifollitropin alfa is a good choice for assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles because fewer injections are needed than with other agents. In this retrospective cohort, we analyzed luteal injected half-dose depot gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist cycles in women who received corifollitropin alfa and those who underwent a conventional corifollitropin alfa cycle with a GnRH antagonist.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort, we analyzed luteal injected half-dose depot GnRH agonist cycles in women who received corifollitropin alfa and those who underwent a conventional corifollitropin alfa cycle with a GnRH antagonist at the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and IVF Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Başkent University School of Medicine, Adana, Turkey, from March 2014 to August 2015. The patient's baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Forty-five patients underwent the long protocol, in which a half-dose of depot GnRH agonist was administered on day 21 of the preceding cycle. Forty-nine patients underwent the GnRH-antagonist protocol. Corifollitropin alfa was administered on the menstrual cycle day 3.

RESULTS

The mean ages of the two groups were similar (32.77±5.55 vs. 34.2±4.51 years ["for the long- and antagonist-protocol groups, respectively"]). The total number of retrieved oocytes, the fertilization rate, and the number of transferred embryos were similar between the two groups. The only significant difference between the two protocols was the number of injections during the controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) cycle, which included the depot-agonist injection in the long-protocol group (4.46±1.64 vs. 5.71±2.51, p=0.006). The clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were similar in the two protocols (16/45 [35.6%] vs. 16/49 [32.7%] for the intention to treat and 32.5±6.82% vs. 36.25±8.58%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that ART cycles could be performed with fewer injections using corifollitropin alfa and a half-dose of depot GnRH agonist.

Delayed Start Versus Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Pretreated With Estradiol in Luteal Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the new delayed start protocol against the conventional gonadotropin (Gn)-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders (PORs).

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 160 women with poor response to previous in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle were randomized either to start Gn then Cetrotide 0.25 subcutaneously (sc) added when leading follicle (DF) reach >12 mm or Cetrotide 0.25 mg sc started first from day 2 to day 8 then Gn therapy was added and Cetrotide restarted when DF reach >12 mm.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between conventional and delayed start protocols regarding the needed dose of Gn for stimulation (4368 ± 643 and 3798 ± 515), level of estradiol (E2; 778 ± 371 and 1076 ± 453), and endometrial thickness at human chorionic gonadotropin triggering (8.6 ± 1.8 and 9.8 ± 1.9), the number of DF (3.4 ± 1.5 and 4.9 ± 2.1), the number of retrieved follicles (2.4 ± 2.1 and 4.3 ± 2.5), and successful embryo transfer (13 vs 16), respectively (P < .05). There was a highly statistically significant difference between the 2 study groups regarding the number of oocytes fertilized (1.2 ± 2.0 vs 3.3 ± 1.4), metaphase II oocytes (0.9 ± 1.0 vs 2.7 + 1.6), and grade I embryos (0.7 ± 0.9 vs 2.1 + 1.1; P < .001). The chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and abortion rate showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 study groups (P value .003 and .006, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Delayed start protocol significantly improved clinical pregnancy rate and IVF cycle parameters in PORs.

Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy

Background

In patients treated with IVF, the incidence of poor ovarian response (POR) after ovarian stimulation varies from 9 to 25 %. However, at present, there are no clear guidelines for treating these poor responders. This study was designed to compare two different ovarian stimulation protocols and addresses future perspectives in the management of these unfortunate patients.

Method

Four hundred and forty poor responders were studied during their second IVF cycle. They had all failed to become pregnant during their first IVF cycle where the long GnRH-agonist stimulation protocol (P1) was used. Patients were prospectively randomly assigned to 2 protocol groups (P2 or P3, 220 patients in each arm) at the start of ovarian stimulation according to the order of entry into the study including one patient per each stimulation protocols: The P2 group was treated with a contraceptive pill + flare-up GnRH-agonist protocol and the P3 group with the GnRH-antagonist protocol. The ovarian stimulation characteristics as well as the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were compared.

Result(s)

Although the numbers of embryos obtained and transferred were significantly higher with the P2 protocol, the implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates per transfer were the same in the two studied groups (8.9 % versus 14.6 % and 8.4 % versus 14.2 % for the P2 and P3 protocols, respectively). Good prognostic factors for ongoing pregnancy with both protocols were: a maternal age <36, no tobacco consumption, a total dose of gonadotropins injection <5000 IU and an endometrial thickness >10 mm.

Conclusion(s)

In poorly responding patients treated with IVF, the implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates per transfer were not significantly different between the two protocols studied: contraceptive pill + flare-up GnRH-agonist protocol and the GnRH-antagonist protocol. It is suggested that current strategies for the management of poor responders be reconsidered in the light of the potential contribution of age and the effect of life style changes on fertility potential. A customised policy of ovarian stimulation in these patients including mild stimulation protocols, sequential IVF cycles, oocytes-embryos freeze all protocols and blastocyst transfers after screening may improve the clinical outcome.

The effect of aromatase inhibitor letrozole incorporated in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist multiple dose protocol in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether letrozole incorporated in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist multiple dose protocol (MDP) improved controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) results in poor responders who underwent IVF treatment.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 103 consecutive IVF cycles that were performed during either the letrozole/GnRH antagonist MDP cycles (letrozole group, n=46) or the standard GnRH antagonist MDP cycles (control group, n=57) were included in 103 poor responders. COS results and IVF outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Total dose and days of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (rhFSH) administered were significantly fewer in the letrozole group than in the control group. Duration of GnRH antagonist administered was also shorter in the letrozole group. The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the letrozole group. However, clinical pregnancy rate per cycle initiated, clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer, embryo implantation rate and miscarriage rate were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The letrozole incorporated in GnRH antagonist MDP may be more effective because it results comparable pregnancy outcomes with shorter duration and smaller dose of rhFSH, when compared with the standard GnRH antagonist MDP.

GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor IVF responders: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of the long GnRH agonist and the fixed GnRH antagonist protocols in IVF poor responders.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized controlled trial performed in the Iakentro IVF centre, Thessaloniki, from January 2007 to December 2011, concerning women characterised as poor responders after having 0-4 oocytes retrieved at a previous IVF cycle. They were assigned at random, using sealed envelopes, to either a long GnRH agonist protocol (group I) or a GnRH antagonist protocol (group II).

RESULTS

Overall 364 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were allocated to the two groups: finally 330 participated in our trial. Of these, 162 were treated with the long GnRH agonist protocol (group I), and 168 with the fixed GnRH antagonist protocol (group II). Numbers of embryos transferred and implantation rates were similar between the two groups (P=NS). The overall cancellation rate was higher in the antagonist group compared to the agonist group, but the difference was not significant (22.15% vs. 15.2%, P=NS). Although clinical pregnancy rates per transfer cycle were not different between the two groups (42.3% vs. 33.1%, P=NS), the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle initiated was significantly higher in the agonist compared to the antagonist group (35.8% vs. 25.6%, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although long GnRH agonist and fixed GnRH antagonist protocols seem to have comparable pregnancy rates per transfer in poor responders undergoing IVF, the higher cancellation rate observed in the antagonist group suggests the long GnRH agonist protocol as the first choice for ovarian stimulation in these patients.

[Prospective randomised study of long versus short agonist protocol with poor responder patients during in vitro fertilization]

OBJECTIVES

Different ovarian stimulation protocols are used for in vitro fertilization (IVF) in "poor responder" patients. Our work aims at comparing two ovarian stimulation protocols (long agonist half-dose protocol versus short agonist protocol without pretreatment) in this population of women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized study was realized at the University Hospital of Saint-Étienne and concerns "poor responder" patients (age between 38 and 42 years and FSH at day 3 more than 9.5 IU/L; and/or antral follicles count less or equal to 6; and/or failure of previous stimulation). The primary endpoint is based on the number of oocytes retrieved at the end of an IVF cycle.

RESULTS

Out of the 44 patients randomized, 39 cycles were taken into account (20 in the long protocol, 19 in the short one). At the end of the stimulation (FSH-r 300 to 450 UI/d), the number of follicles recruited appears higher in the long protocol but the difference is not significant (diameter between 14 and 18 mm: 3.0±2.31 vs. 1.88±1.89 and diameter greater than 18 mm: 3.9±2 85 vs. 3.06±2.77). The same tendency is observed for all the following criteria: the number of retrieved oocytes (6.74±2.73 vs. 6.38±4.26), the total number of embryos (3.16±2.03 vs. 2.25±2.11), the pregnancy rate per retrieval (21% vs. 19%) and per cycle (20% vs. 16%), and the number of children born alive.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The study did not reveal any difference between the two protocols but the long half-dose seems to be better.

GnRH antagonist multiple dose protocol with oral contraceptive pill pretreatment in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of GnRH antagonist multiple-dose protocol (MDP) with oral contraceptive pill (OCP) pretreatment in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI, compared with GnRH antagonist MDP without OCP pretreatment and GnRH agonist low-dose long protocol (LP).

Methods

A total of 120 poor responders were randomized into three groups according to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) options; GnRH antagonist MDP after OCP pretreatment (group 1), GnRH antagonist MDP without OCP pretreatment (group 2) or GnRH agonist luteal low-dose LP without OCP pretreatment (group 3). Patients allocated in group 1 were pretreated with OCP for 21days in the cycle preceding COS, and ovarian stimulation using recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) was started 5 days after discontinuation of OCP.

Results

There were no differences in patients' characteristics among three groups. Total dose and days of rhFSH used for COS were significantly higher in group 3 than in group 1 or 2. The numbers of mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes and grade I, II embryos were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 or 3. There were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate among three groups.

Conclusion

GnRH antagonist MDP with OCP pretreatment is at least as effective as GnRH agonist low-dose LP in poor responders and can benefit the poor responders by reducing the amount and duration of FSH required for follicular maturation.

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for low responders in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a low-dose flare protocol

In this retrospective study of 652 anticipated low response women, the overall clinical outcomes (live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate [PR]) of low-dose flare (LDF) protocol appeared lower than those of conventional down-regulation (DR) (LDF: 15.1% vs. DR: 20.6% and LDF: 10.3% vs. DR: 17.4%, respectively). The findings that LDF protocol improved the clinical outcome in older women, or when LDF followed an unsuccessful IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle with DR (LDF: 19.4% vs. DR: 9.76% and LDF: 13.9% vs. DR: 4.2% respectively), need further evaluation through randomized trials.

In-vitrofertilisation treatment: Factors affecting its results and outcome

The objective of this study was to determine factors affecting results and outcome of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). In this retrospective study, a total of 891 infertile women underwent IVF/ICSI cycles at the King Hussein Medical Center (KHMC) between January 2001 and December 2002. Conventional IVF treatment was performed in 64.6% of women and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 35.4%, using a standardised long luteal protocol. Pregnancy rate was analysed according to age, type of infertility, cause of infertility, duration of infertility, number of eggs collected and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels. A total of 126 cycles (14.1%) were cancelled. Among 765 cycles continued, fertilisation rate was 73.9%, implantation rate was 15.1% and pregnancy rate was 29.8%. Pregnant women had a multiple pregnancy rate of 28.9%, abortion rate of 13.6% and ectopic pregnancy rate of 1.3%. Duration and type of infertility had no significant effect on the pregnancy rate. Factors which appear to affect significantly the outcome of treatment include the woman's age, cause of infertility, basal concentrations of FSH, adequate ovarian responsiveness and the number of eggs collected. In some cases with poor outcome, the understanding of these factors may predict the results and lead to the development of new strategies to improve the outcome of IVF treatment.

Management of the poor responder: the role of GnRH agonists and antagonists

PURPOSE

Evaluate the relative benefit of various doses and regimens of GnRH agonists (GnRHa) and antagonists (GnRHant) in the management of the poor responder.

METHODS

Review of English language publications with an emphasis on prospective randomized trials where available.

RESULTS

The lack of a uniformly applied definition of the poor responder and dearth of prospective randomized trials make data analysis difficult. Traditional GnRHa flare and long luteal phase protocols do not appear to be beneficial. Reduction of GnRHa doses, "stop" protocols, and microdose GnRHa flare regimes all appear to enhance outcomes, although the relative benefit of one approach over another has not been conclusively demonstrated. GnRHant does improve outcomes in this patient population, although, in general, pregnancy rates appear to be lower in comparison to microdose GnRHa flare regimes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no one controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol which is best suited for all poor responders. Low dose GnRHa regimes appear to be most advantageous. Prediction of compromised response prior to cycle initiation by a thorough assessment of ovarian reserve as well as a careful review of past response should allow for selection of an appropriate COH protocol for each individual patient.

Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve

PURPOSE

To review the available treatments for women with significantly diminished ovarian reserve and assess the efficacy of different ovarian stimulation protocols.

METHODS

Literature research performed among studies that have been published in the Pubmed, in the Scopus Search Machine and in Cohrane database of systematic reviews.

RESULTS

A lack of clear, uniform definition of the poor responders and a lack of large-scale randomized studies make data interpretation very difficult for precise conclusions. Optimistic data have been presented by the use of high doses of gonadotropins, flare up Gn RH-a protocol (standard or microdose), stop protocols, luteal onset of Gn RH-a and the short protocol. Natural cycle or a modified natural cycle seems to be an appropriate strategy. Low dose hCG in the first days of ovarian stimulation has promising results. Molecular biology tools (mutations, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) have been also considered to assist the management of this group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ideal stimulation for these patients with diminished ovarian reserve remains a great challenge for the clinician, within the limits of our pharmaceutical quiver.

Role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in poor responders

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of GnRH antagonists in poor-responder protocols.

DESIGN

Literature review.

CONCLUSION(S)

The optimum stimulation protocol for poor responders is unknown. Although many IVF programs currently use GnRH antagonists for poor responders, there have been only four prospective, randomized trials comparing GnRH antagonists to alternate protocols. None of these studies had sufficient power to evaluate a difference in pregnancy rates (PRs), and in all four cases, IVF outcomes were comparable. Nevertheless, interest in the use of GnRH antagonists in poor responders has continued. GnRH antagonists may be associated with simpler stimulation protocols, lower gonadotropin requirements, reduced patient costs, and shorter downtimes between consecutive cycles. However, the greatest advantage of GnRH antagonists may lie in the ability to assess ovarian reserves immediately prior to deciding whether or not to initiate gonadotropin stimulation. The ability to respond to cycle-to-cycle variation in antral follicle counts may allow the optimization of oocyte yield and reduce cycle cancellation rates. It remains to be seen if this approach (initiating gonadotropins only in cycles where an adequate antral follicle count is present) also translates into higher clinical PRs for poor responders.

Cetrorelix in women with poor ovarian response in previous assisted reproduction cycles

Our aim was to compare a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol with an analogue protocol using high dose gonadotrophins (rFSH) in women with poor ovarian response in order to optimise the management while undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. We recruited 31 consecutive patients over 5 months. The eligibility criteria for the study were: one or more previous cancelled cycle due to <or=3 follicles on day of hCG, or a total of >or=4,500 IU of rFSH. For the antagonist cycle regimen, we used daily 300 IU of rFSH from day 2 on the menses, and then from day 5 daily 0.25 mg of Cetrorelix until the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration. We demonstrated that the use of an antagonist cycle was associated with a reduction in cancellation rates from 48% (agonist) to 10% (antagonist) (p < 0.039) allowing women to undergoing oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer with a non-significant improvement in the pregnancy rates.

A preliminary study on reduced dose (33 or 25 microg) gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol for multifollicular ovarian stimulation in patients with high basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of half-dose (50 mug) and further reduced dose (33 or 25 mug) gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a; triptorelin) long protocols for multifollicular ovarian stimulation (MFOS) for patients with high basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). One hundred and two IVF-ET cycles performed in 84 infertile patients with high basal serum FSH (>10.0 mIU/ml) were included in this retrospective study. Study subjects were assigned to two groups: continuous half-dose GnRH-a long protocol (group A, n = 63) vs. further reduced dose GnRH-a long protocol (group B, n = 39) from half-dose at the start of GnRH-a to one-third or one-quarter dose after pituitary downregulation. Exogenous FSH or human menopausal gonadotropin was administered for MFOS in step-down mode, four or fewer embryos were transferred, and the outcomes of MFOS were compared between the two groups. Serum estradiol (E(2)) level on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration was significantly higher in group B (mean +/- standard deviation (SD): 1318.3 +/- 1120.4 vs. 2054.9 +/- 1773.5 pg/ml, p = 0.015). The number of transferable and good-quality embryos was also significantly higher in group B (mean +/- SD: 2.9 +/- 1.7 vs. 3.7 +/- 2.0, p = 0.027; 1.8 +/- 1.4 vs. 2.7 +/- 2.0, p = 0.020). No statistically significant difference in the outcomes was observed with respect to the dose of gonadotropins administered, the number of oocytes retrieved or the clinical pregnancy rate. In conclusion, GnRH-a long protocol with a reduced dose, tapered from the starting half-dose to a third or a quarter of the normal dose after pituitary suppression, may be beneficial for MFOS in IVF-ET patients with a high basal serum FSH level. A further prospective randomized controlled study on a larger scale is needed to confirm these findings.

An initial low response predicts poor outcome in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection despite improved ovarian response in consecutive cycles

OBJECTIVE

To study the predictive value of initial low response (LR) in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Two Finnish fertility centers.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 3,846 IVF/ICSI cycles performed from 1994 to 2002.

INTERVENTION(S)

Consecutive cycles in the same subject were identified. The study groups consisted of subjects who had three treatment cycles and at least one LR cycle (n = 80).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy rate (PR), total gonadotropin dose, and embryo quality.

RESULT(S)

Only 2.5% (2/80) of subjects had a LR in all three consecutive cycles. In 43 women an initial LR was followed by >/=1 normal response (NR) cycle, and in 35 women an initial NR was followed by >/=1 LR cycle. The PR/cycle was similarly low in women with an initial LR and an initial NR (10.1% vs. 16.2%). An increase in gonadotropin dose resulted in a higher number of oocytes in women with an initial LR (from 2.1 +/- 0.9 to 6.7 +/- 2.7) but the PR/cycle remained low, compared to the overall mean PR (27.2%). In cycles in which top quality embryos were transferred, subjects with an initial LR had a lower PR than women with an initial NR (17.8% vs. 41.2%).

CONCLUSION(S)

An initial LR is a predictor of poor outcome in subsequent cycles, even if ovarian response is improved by increasing the gonadotropin dose or a top quality embryo is replaced.

GnRH antagonist in IVF poor-responder patients: results of a randomized trial

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH) in comparison with the standard long protocol in poor-responder patients. Sixty patients with poor ovarian response in previous treatment cycles were randomized into two groups: group A (n = 30) was stimulated with a standard long protocol, and group B (n = 30) received GnRH antagonist. Vaginal ultrasound was performed to evaluate ovarian response. There was a significantly reduced duration of ovarian stimulation (9.8 +/- 0.8 versus 14.6 +/- 1.2, P = 0.001) in group B in comparison with group A, and a reduced number of ampoules was used in group B (49.3 +/- 4.3 versus 72.6 +/- 6.8, P = 0.0001). In group B, the number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher than in group A (5.6 +/- 1.6 versus 4.3 +/- 2.2, P = 0.02) and there was an increased number of follicles with a diameter >15 mm at human chorionic gonadotrophin administration in group B (P = 0.0001). Fewer cycles were cancelled with the use of an antagonist protocol. Five pregnancies (17% for embryo transfer) were obtained with GnRH antagonist protocol and two (7% for embryo transfer) with GnRH agonist protocol.

Randomized trial to compare the effect of recombinant human FSH (follitropin alfa) with or without recombinant human LH in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment

Women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for male factor infertility were randomly assigned to receive ovarian stimulation in a long agonist protocol with a combination of recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH; Gonal-F) and recombinant human LH (r-hLH; Luveris) (n = 212) starting on day 6 of FSH stimulation until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) at a daily fixed dose of 150 IU r-hLH, or with r-hFSH alone (n = 219). There was no significant difference in the number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved (10.3 versus 10.4) in patients treated with r-hFSH and r-hLH versus r-hFSH alone; however, more embryos were transferred in the LH-supplemented group (2.9 versus 2.8, P = 0.037). Overall, the implantation rates were 22.9 versus 27.0% in patients treated with r-hFSH and r-hLH versus with r-hFSH alone respectively (NS). The respective numbers of MII oocytes retrieved in patients <35 or >or=35 years were 11 versus 8.3 (P = 0.010) for patients treated with r-hFSH alone, and 10.7 versus 9.3 (NS) for those given supplemental r-hLH (150 IU) from day 6. Implantation rates in patients <35 years treated with r-hFSH were higher (30.7%) than those receiving r-hFSH and r-hLH, (23.5%) (P = 0.068). In patients >or=35 years, the implantation rates were 21.7% for those patients supplemented with 150 IU r-hLH from day 6 of stimulation versus 15.7% when treated with FSH alone (NS). Younger patients therefore do not seem to benefit from an LH-supplemented ovarian stimulation protocol, but women >or=35 years undergoing assisted reproduction may benefit from using r-hLH in addition to r-hFSH.

Half-dose depot triptorelin in pituitary suppression for multiple ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology: a randomized study*

BACKGROUND

Pituitary suppression by depot GnRH agonist may be excessive for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology. This study compares the efficacy of standard and half-dose depot triptorelin in a long protocol.

METHODS

A total of 180 patients were randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes. Pituitary desensitization was obtained in group 1 (90 patients) with half-dose (1.87 mg) triptorelin depot in the mid-luteal phase of their menstrual cycle, and in group 2 (90 patients) with full-dose (3.75 mg) triptorelin.

RESULTS

There was no premature LH surge, with LH levels being lower in the full-dose group (1.04+/-0.05 versus 0.7+/-0.06 IU/l on the day of hCG). The number of FSH ampoules used was lower in group 1 (42+/-2 versus 59+/-3). The numbers of mature oocytes (10.1+/-0.54 versus 7.4+/-0.55), of fertilized oocytes (8.24+/-0.35 versus 6.34+/-0.37) and of embryos (7.8+/-0.36 versus 5.9+/-0.37) were significantly higher in group 1. No significant differences were found in pregnancy (38.8 versus 25.3%), implantation (22.6 versus 13.8%) or abortion (6.1 versus 5.0%) rates. Cumulative pregnancy (fresh plus frozen embryo transfers: 56.8 versus 35.4%) rate was significantly higher in group 1.

CONCLUSION

A half-dose of depot triptorelin can be successfully used in ovarian stimulation for IVF and produce a higher number of good quality embryos with a good chance of implantation.

GnRH analogs: depot versus short formulations

Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) are widely used in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for assisted reproduction (ART). Two different formulations are now available: short formulations and depot formulation. Some authors have suggested that depot GnRH-a induce a too high pituitary suppression and have put forward protocols using reduced GnRH-a doses. A reduced dose of daily triptorelin is enough for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation but provides no significant improvement in IVF cycle outcome when compared with depot formulation in normally responding women. However, it seems to improve ovarian response and overall results in poor responding patients. Low doses of short GnRH-a allow shorter treatment, requiring lower amounts of gonadotropins. This possibility should be considered in view of its economic advantage.

Alternative Approaches in the Management of Poor Response in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH)

Improving pregnancy rates in patients with many failed attempts remains a challenge during IVF-ET or ICSI-ET programs. The availability of good-quality oocytes is a prerequisite for good results in such programs. The use of a personalized protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) that gives the best possible results for the specific patient is a main factor for the success in IVF or ICSI. The response of many patients to the ovarian stimulation used is very poor, giving fewer oocytes than expected, resulting in much lower, if any, pregnancy rates. The definition of a poor responder is not clear and differs among researchers. A variety of strategies have been used to improve response in these patients, regardless of the definition used. These include various ovulation induction protocols that we believe might assist these patients achieve a pregnancy. The difficulty is greater due to the fact that poor responders are not a homogeneous group and each patient may have a different cause. More studies with large numbers of patients are needed in order to find those protocols that could provide these couples with an acceptable pregnancy rate.

Age-related decline in fertility

A progressive decline in fecundity with advancing age is a reality, attributed primarily to the detrimental impact of various aging processes on female gametes. Despite medical advances that have dramatically prolonged the female life span, declining numbers and deteriorating quality of oocytes, and an increasing incidence of meiotic errors and aneuploidy of gametes and embryos, reduce clinical pregnancy rates and escalate pregnancy wastage. Increased fetal aneuploidies in ongoing pregnancies and an increased predisposition to obstetric morbidities further contribute to the diminishing reproductive successes associated with advancing age. The age of male partners, despite the decline in semen parameters and sexual performance with aging, does not appear to have a major impact on the eventual fertility of the aging couple. The contributions of age-related impaired sexuality and ejaculatory problems, although slight albeit significant, to declining fertility in the aging should be appreciated in appropriate cases. With the realization of the age-related detriment on fertility potential and the limitations of available therapeutic interventions, management of subfecundity in women beyond their mid-30s should be approached aggressively. Success of ovulation induction with clomiphine citrate or gonadotropins is marginal in women aged older than 40 years; a case can be made to proceed directly with ART in women in this age group, especially when there is coexisting male factor or pelvic disease. Except for the use of donor oocytes, the outcome of various therapeutic interventions to optimize reproductive performance in women aged older than 44 years remains dismal. A broader application of PGD techniques may contribute to improved live birth rates in reproductively aging women. The greater likelihood of obstetric complications in pregnancies resulting from donor oocytes and an increased prevalence of age-related medical problems complicating pregnancy should prompt a thorough medical evaluation before proceeding with ART.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and reproductive medicine

The hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is a key regulator of the reproductive system, mainly through its effects on pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) release. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues are modifications of the natural decapeptide, being either agonists (GnRHa) or antagonists. GnRHa may imitate the native hormone and induce an endogenous LH surge; however, sustained treatment with GnRHa results in complete refractoriness of LH and FSH production. This aspect of GnRHa action is the main application of the GnRHa in reproduction today. The hypogonadotropic hypogonadal state that results from the sustained treatment is the basis for additional applications of the GnRHa. The agonists appear to be effective, to some extent, for the treatment of endometriosis and were proved to be beneficial prior to surgery for fibroma uteri. GnRHa is used in assisted reproduction for both induction of an endogenous LH surge and for induction of ovulation, and its capacity to cause refractoriness of the pituitary may be used to avoid a premature LH surge. It is suggested that the GnRHa have a direct effect on ovarian steroidogenesis, which is independent of its action on the pituitary. This unwanted effect and other possible drawbacks of the agonists are thought to be eliminated with the use of the antagonists. The mechanism of action of these antagonists is through competitive blocking of the GnRH receptor, which results in a rapid but reversible suppression of gonadotropin secretion. As for GnRHa, GnRH antagonists have been proven effective to prevent the LH surge and to reduce the incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles.

Poor responders: does the protocol make a difference?

An inadequate response to gonadotropins during in-vitro fertilization treatment may result in cycle cancellation, fewer embryos available for transfer and decreased pregnancy rates. For these reasons, numerous strategies to improve ovarian stimulation in poor responders have been proposed. These include variations in the type, dose and timing of gonadotropins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Unfortunately, despite optimism generated by studies using retrospective controls, epidemiologically sound trials have been scarce. Indeed, of the three prospective randomized trials performed in poor responders to date no compelling advantage for one stimulation protocol over another has been established. Although this lack of improvement may reflect inadequate sample sizes, an alternative explanation is simply that the protocol, after a certain point, does not make a difference. Aside from oocyte donation, greater hope for poor responders may rest in aneuploidy screening, in-vitro oocyte maturation and cytoplasm/nuclear transfer.

Rescue of IVF cycles by HMG in pituitary down-regulated normogonadotrophic young women characterized by a poor initial response to recombinant FSH

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adding human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) during controlled ovarian stimulation in normoovulatory normogonadotrophic patients showing an initial suboptimal response to a standardized long protocol therapy with recombinant FSH (rFSH) (300 IU/day).

METHODS

A total of 43 such patients were randomized in two groups. In Group A, 150 IU rFSH was substituted by 150 IU HMG after day 8 of stimulation. The stimulation protocol of Group B involved a simple increase of the daily rFSH dose to 375 IU after day 8. A total of 40 BMI and age matched patients with an optimal ovarian response formed the control group (Group C).

RESULTS

The mean Group A serum concentration of oestradiol on the day of HCG administration and average number of oocytes retrieved were significantly higher than Group B (P < 0.001) and equivalent to Group C. A total of 10 pregnancies (50%) in Group A, 8 (34.8%) in Group B and 19 (47.5%) in the control group were achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that LH supplementation improves the ovarian outcome in patients characterized by an inadequate initial response to rFSH therapy in a long protocol.

Hypothalamic-pituitary suppression with oral contraceptive pills does not improve outcome in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the use of OCP with GnRHa for hypothalamic-pituitary suppression in poor responder IVF patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of IVF-ET cycles of poor responders. Hypothalamic-pituitary suppression with OCP (Group I, n = 29) or GnRHa (Group II, n = 52), followed by stimulation with gonadotropin, oocyte retrieval, and embryo transfer. Baseline characteristics and cycle outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

73 women underwent 81 cycles from 1/1/1999 to 1/1/2000. Baseline characteristics were similar. 31/81 (38%) cycles were cancelled (Group I, 14/29 (48%) vs. Group II, 17/52 (33%), NS). Cycle outcomes including amount of gonadotropin, number of eggs retrieved, number of embryos transferred, and embryo quality were similar. Patients in Group I required fewer days of stimulation to reach oocyte retrieval. Pregnancy outcomes were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective analysis revealed no improvement in IVF cycle outcomes in poor responders who received OCPs to achieve hypothalamic-pituitary suppression instead of GnRHa.

Evaluation and treatment of low responders in assisted reproductive technology: a challenge to meet

PURPOSE

To investigate the various methods of evaluation and treatment of patients with a low response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive technologies (ART).

METHODS

Review and analysis of relevant studies published in the last decade, identified through the literature and Medline searches.

RESULTS

While a universally accepted definition for low responders is still lacking, these patients are reported to represent about 10% of the ART population. Several ovarian reserve screening techniques have been proposed; however, currently the best-characterized and most sensitive screening tools available are the basal day 3 serum follicle-stimulating hormone level and the clomiphene citrate challenge test. When abnormal, these tests allow physicians to counsel patients that their prognosis for conception is poor. Although the presence of a normal result does indicate better long-term chances for conception, on age-related decline in fecundity remains and patient age should still be considered when counseling patients with normal screening results. Several stimulation protocols have been applied in the low-response group with varying success. Recent studies show that the use of a minidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist protocol may result in significantly decreased cycle cancellations as well as increased clinical and ongoing pregnancies, and thus is proposed as a first-line therapy. Studies evaluating supplementary forms of treatment to the ovulation induction regimen show improved outcome when pretreating with oral contraceptives, whereas there seems to be no benefit from cotreatment with growth hormone or glucocorticoids. Blastocyst culture and transfer and assisted hatching in low responders are still under evaluation, whereas natural cycle in vitro fertilization may be used in cases of repeated failures as a last option before resorting to oocyte donation or adoption. Future possible forms of treatment like in vitro maturation of immature human oocytes, cytoplasm, and nuclear transfer currently are experimental in nature and their efficacy has still to be proven.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation and treatment of low responders in ART remains a challenge. Understanding of the underlying etiology and pathophysiology of this disorder may help the clinician to approach it successfully.

Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of various controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimens in the prior poor-responder patient preparing for assisted reproductive techniques.

DESIGN

English-language literature review.

PATIENT(S)

Candidates for assisted reproductive techniques who had been defined as having a prior suboptimal response to standard COH regimens.

INTERVENTION(S)

A variety of regimes are reviewed, including increased gonadotropin doses, change of gonadotropins, adjunctive growth hormone (GH), luteal phase (long) GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) initiation, early follicular phase (flare) GnRH-a initiation, low-dose luteal phase (ultrashort) GnRH-a initiation, progestin pretreatment, and microdose flare GnRH-a initiation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Maximal serum E(2) levels, follicular development, dose, and duration of gonadotropin therapy, cycle cancellation rates, oocytes retrieved, embryos transferred, and clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates.

RESULT(S)

A lack of uniformity in definition of the poor responder and of prospective randomized trials make data interpretation somewhat difficult. Of the varied strategies proposed, those that seem to be more uniformly beneficial are microdose GnRH-a flare and late luteal phase initiation of a short course of low-dose GnRH-a discontinued before COH.

CONCLUSION(S)

No single regimen will benefit all poor responders. General acceptance of uniform definitions and performance of large-scale prospective randomized trials are critical. Development of a reliable precycle screen will allow effective differentiation among normal responders, poor responders, and those who will not conceive with their own oocytes.

Does pretreatment with progestogen or oral contraceptive pills in low responders followed by the GnRHa flare protocol improve the outcome of IVF-ET?

PURPOSE

Women undergoing in vitro fertilization with low ovarian reserve and poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) present a management dilemma. In a retrospective observational study, we compared the pretreatment use of the gestogen medroxyprogesterone acetate (10 mg twice daily from day 15 of the cycle for a minimum of 2 weeks) with an oral contraceptive pill (one tablet daily from day 4 of the cycle for a minimum of 3 weeks).

METHODS

The criteria for inclusion in the study included one or more of the following: abandoned cycles due to poor response, fewer than four oocytes retrieved following a standard COH protocol, age > 39 years, and elevated basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Thirty-eight women received pretreatment with gestogen, and a similar number of women received pretreatment with the pill. The flare protocol was used in all treatment cycles combined with an individualized dose of human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) (4-8 ampoules/day of 75 units FSH/ampoule) depending on previous response, age, and early follicular serum FSH level. Both groups were similar in mean age, duration of infertility, early follicular FSH levels, and the distribution of various aetiologies.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine cycles were abandoned before oocyte retrieval, 15 (39.5%) in the pill group and 14 (36.8%) in the gestogen group, because of an inadequate ovarian response. The mean (+/- SD) number of ampoules (75 IU FSH/ampoule) of hMG used per cycle was similar in the pill and gestogen groups (59.7 +/- 19.3 vs. 70.2 +/- 29.4, respectively). There also was no difference seen in the numbers of oocytes retrieved (4.4 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.2 +/- 2.5), total number of embryos (2.5 +/- 2.4 vs. 2.2 +/- 1.1), or the number of embryos transferred (1.8 +/- 1.2 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.0) in the pill and gestogen groups, respectively. One pregnancy in each group resulted following embryo transfer in 22 women in the pill group and in 24 women in the gestogen group.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that pre-IVF treatment with oral contraceptive pill or gestogen combined with the flare protocol in women at high risk of or with a history of poor ovarian response, as defined in this study, did not appear to result in an improvement in outcome of IVF-embryo transfer.

Gonadotropin stimulation following GnRH-a priming for poor responders in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programs

The effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) administration before gonadotropin superovulation on the stimulation characteristics of poor responder patients was assessed in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. Thirty consecutive patients who had exhibited low ovarian response (fewer than four retrieved oocytes) in at least two previous IVF cycles (control cycles, n = 60), were eligible for the study. GnRH-a (nafarelin) was administered daily for 7-10 days from the mid-luteal phase of the previous cycle until the first day of menstruation. Menotropin treatment was commenced on cycle day 3 (with no additional GnRH-a) (study cycles, n = 39). A significantly higher number of oocytes was retrieved (p < 0.0002) and a higher number of embryos transferred (p < 0.003) in the study cycles than in the control cycles. No cases of premature luteinizing hormone surge were recorded. Pregnancy rates per embryo transfer and per cycle were 10.4% and 7.7% for the study cycles and 2.8% and 1.6% for the control cycles, respectively. GnRH-a, administered prior to gonadotropin treatment, should be an additional option of ovulation induction protocol for poor responders in IVF programs.

The significance of delayed suppression using buserelin acetate and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a long protocol in vitro fertilization program

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the time taken to achieve ovarian suppression has an impact on ovarian responsiveness and the outcome of IVF-ET.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

An assisted reproduction unit at a university center.

PATIENT(S)

Patients undergoing a long protocol of IVF-ET that included buserelin acetate therapy initiated on day 2 of the cycle and recombinant FSH.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of buserelin acetate therapy required to achieve pituitary and ovarian suppression (group 1 = 2 weeks, n = 172; group 2 = > or =3 weeks, n = 337).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Number of recombinant FSH ampules administered, duration of ovarian stimulation (days), ovarian response, and IVF outcome.

RESULT(S)

The patients in group 2 had lower mean E2 levels after 5 days and 9 days of stimulation than the patients in group 1. The number of recombinant FSH ampules administered and the number of days of stimulation required were higher in group 2 than in group 1. These differences were prominent in the subgroups of older patients (> or =36 years) and patients who had no evidence of polycystic ovaries on ultrasound examination. The number of oocytes retrieved and fertilized, the cancelation rate, and the pregnancy rate were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Prolonged administration of a GnRH agonist to achieve suppression leads to a reduced ovarian response, particularly in women > or =36 years of age, but does not affect the success rate of IVF-ET.

Effectiveness of low dose of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist on hormonal flare-up

PURPOSE

The hormonal response (flare-up) following administration of a standard dose (100 micrograms) or a low dose (25 micrograms) of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) (Triptorelin) was compared in patients prior to an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle and during the early follicular phase of a short-term IVF protocol.

METHODS

The gonadotroph (FSH, LH) and steroid [estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P)] flare-up was studied on two consecutive cycles in 30 normo-ovulatory women. Patients were randomized to receive either 25 or 100 micrograms of triptorelin for three days at the beginning of the first cycle. Then doses were switched according to a crossing over design in the second cycle.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the magnitude of FSH and E2 release could be observed following administration of the two doses of agonist whereas maximal plasma LH level was significantly reduced after injection of 25 micrograms of triptorelin.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared to a standard dose, using a low dose of GnRH-a induces an hormonal flare-up which seems adequate for an optimal follicular recruitment.

Selection of good embryos for transfer depends on embryo cohort size: implications for the 'mild ovarian stimulation' debate

Embryo quality evaluated by the embryo morphology is a critical parameter in human in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer. It determines which and how many embryos will be replaced, as pregnancy rates are directly related to number and quality of transferred embryos. This retrospective analysis included 1301 IVF and embryo transfer cycles to identify which factors influenced embryo quality. Embryo quality did not correlate with maternal age, causes of infertility, ovarian stimulation parameters or embryo cohort size. However, the mean score of transferred embryos was significantly higher for patients with more than five embryos compared to fewer than five embryos (P < 0.001), irrespective of maternal age. Patients tended to produce a similar embryo quality from cycle to cycle, r = 0.33 (P < 0.001) for the embryo cohort and r= 0.47 (P < 0.001) for the transferred embryos. Poor embryo morphology probably reflects oocytes with compromised development competence and could be an independent factor of infertility. Furthermore, a large embryo cohort was the main factor increasing the chances of at least one good embryo in the cohort.

Cessation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) upon down-regulation versus conventional long GnRH-a protocol in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen that involves GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) discontinuation before administration of gonadotropins would benefit poor responders.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Hospital-based IVF Unit.

PATIENT(S)

Sixty-three patients with previous poor response to COH and/or high basal FSH level (> or =9 mIU/mL) undergoing 78 IVF-ET cycles.

INTERVENTION(S)

In both groups, administration of GnRH-a was started in the midluteal phase. Whereas in the study group (40 cycles), it ended before administration of gonadotropins, in controls (38 cycles) GnRH-a treatment was continued throughout the follicular phase.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Ovarian stimulation patterns and IVF outcome.

RESULT(S)

A significantly higher cancellation rate was noted in the study group than in the controls (22.5% versus 5%, respectively). The new and control regimens resulted in similar stimulation characteristics and clinical pregnancy rates (11% versus 10.3%, respectively). In 13 patients with a basal FSH level that was not persistently high, the new regimen resulted in a significantly higher number of retrieved oocytes compared with the standard protocol (7.6+/-1.03 versus 4.0+/-0.68, respectively).

CONCLUSION(S)

Whereas for most low responders, the new COH regimen offers no further advantage, future prospective studies may demonstrate whether it can confer a benefit for a subset of patients with a basal FSH level that is not persistently high.

In vitro fertilization outcome according to age and follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3

PURPOSE

In a retrospective study, the prognostic factors of in vitro fertilization outcome were studied in women of 39 years of age or older, with an elevated cycle day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level.

METHODS

Ovarian stimulation was achieved with a combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/human menopausal gonadotropin in a short protocol. All patients underwent FSH dosage on cycle day 3 prior to stimulation. The pregnancy rate was studied according to age, FSH levels, and stimulation parameters.

RESULTS

There was a negative correlation between day 3 FSH levels and the number of ovocytes retrieved. Cycles canceled because of the absence of ovarian response had a significantly higher mean FSH value (18.2 mlU/ml) than cycles ending in ovocyte retrieval (14.6 mlU/ml). Patients with three or more growing follicles during stimulation achieved a significantly higher pregnancy rate per egg retrieval (16%) compared to patients with fewer than three growing follicles (6%). Eighty percent of those pregnancies were obtained during the first two IVF cycles. Even with an elevated FSH level, some patients developed three or more follicles after stimulation. In such cases, the number of embryos available for transfer was the only significant limiting factor to achieving pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

As our results suggest, there is a discrepancy between biological and chronological ovarian age. In patients with an elevated cycle day 3 FSH level and over 40 years of age, alternatives to fertility treatments (ovum donation, adoption, or no treatment) should not be considered as first choices. Indeed, even with elevated FSH levels, a 16% pregnancy rate per egg retrieval may be obtained if three or more growing follicles can be seen during ovarian stimulation. However, in the presence of fewer than three growing follicles during ovarian stimulation, the patient should be informed about the discouraging prognosis of the running cycle.