The desire for multiple births in couples with infertility problems contradicts present practice patterns

Applying a Goal-Directed Behavior Model to Determine Risk Perception of COVID-19 and War on Potential Travelers' Behavioral Intentions

The purpose of this study is to verify the influence of the relationship between risk perception of COVID-19 and the war-applied Model of Goal-directed Behavior (MGB) based on stimulus-organism-response (SOR) and potential travelers' behavioral intention. In addition, this study attempted to verify the relationship among uncertainty toward international travel, mental well-being toward international travel, and desire toward travelers' behavioral intention. Moreover, we examined the moderating effect of gender (female vs. male) among all variables for dependents. The survey was conducted on potential travelers in Korea. As for the survey period, a survey was conducted for one month beginning on 2 September 2022. Of the total 413 surveys, 361 surveys were used for the final analysis, and 52 unfaithful surveys were excluded. In addition, demographic, CFA, correlation analysis, structural equation modeling, and moderation effect analysis were verified using SPSS and AMOS. For the data analysis, we used SPSS 18.0 and Amos 20.0 to perform factor analysis and SEM. Significant effects were found in support for Hypotheses 1-5. Further, when it comes to the difference of gender on the relationship between all the variables, while no significant effect was found for Hypotheses 6a,c,e,g, a significant effect was found for Hypotheses 6b,d,f. Thus, H6a,c,e were rejected and H6b,d,f were supported. It was found that females had a greater influence on mental health and desire for overseas travel than males, but it was found that there was no difference between females and males in the relationship between desire and behavioral intention. Therefore, it was possible to verify that the MGB desire is an important psychological variable for both females and males. Furthermore, these findings offer academic practical implications to travel and tourism companies by presenting basic data based on the results of empirical research analysis in the context of the current dangerous situation.

Revisiting selected ethical aspects of current clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF) practice

Ethical considerations are central to all medicine though, likely, nowhere more essential than in the practice of reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Through in vitro fertilization (IVF), this is the only field in medicine involved in creating human life. IVF has, indeed, so far led to close to 10 million births worldwide. Yet, relating to substantial changes in clinical practice of IVF, the medical literature has remained surprisingly quiet over the last two decades. Major changes especially since 2010, however, call for an updated commentary. Three key changes deserve special notice: Starting out as a strictly medical service, IVF in recent years, in efforts to expand female reproductive lifespans in a process given the term “planned” oocyte cryopreservation, increasingly became more socially motivated. The IVF field also increasingly underwent industrialization and commoditization by outside financial interests. Finally, at least partially driven by industrialization and commoditization, so-called add-ons, the term describing mostly unvalidated tests and procedures added to IVF since 2010, have been held responsible for worldwide declines in fresh, non-donor live birthrates after IVF, to levels not seen since the mid-1990s. We here, therefore, do not offer a review of bioethical considerations regarding IVF as a fertility treatment, but attempt to point out ethical issues that arose because of major recent changes in clinical IVF practice.

Intention of having a second child among infertile and fertile women attending outpatient gynecology clinics in three major cities in China: a cross-sectional study

STUDY QUESTION

What is the intention to have a second child among women attending outpatient gynecology clinics in three major cities in China?

SUMMARY ANSWER

In total, 69.3% of the participants expressed the intention to have a second child and this was related to infertility status, pronatalist attitudes, and sociodemographic factors.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In 2016, the new universal two-child policy was introduced in China enabling all Chinese couples to have a second child. A government-led national survey revealed that the majority of women included under the policy would be 35 years old and older and thus would be at higher risk of infertility. Previous studies found that fertility intention differs by infertility status.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

A cross-sectional survey was performed to examine the intention of having a second child and its associated factors among infertile and fertile women attending gynecology outpatient clinics in three major cities in China. Clinical nurses approached eligible women in person while waiting for their consultations. Recruitment and data collection were conducted from April to August 2016.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

The survey involved four gynecology outpatient clinics in Beijing, Shenzhen, and Hohhot. Married women aged 20-45 years who were seeking outpatient gynecology care for non-malignant problems were invited to participate.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Data from 974 women were included in the analysis. A total of 69.3% of the women expressed the intention to have a second child, and infertile women were more likely to want a second child compared to fertile women (76.6% vs 61.9%, respectively; P < 0.001). Greater ideal parity facilitated the intention for a second child in both groups, while pronatalist attitudes (meaning that they preferred to have their first childbirth at a younger age and attached greater significance to traditional childbearing beliefs), unexplained infertility, presence of a living child and religious affiliation were associated with greater intention among infertile women. In contrast, in the fertile group, older age, full-time work and lower confidence in achieving parity goals diminished the intention for a second child. Although infertile women displayed greater agreement with pronatalist attitudes and desired a higher ideal parity, they had less confidence in achieving their parity goals than their fertile counterparts.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

In addition to self-report and self-selection bias, our participants were recruited from urbanized areas and were more educated than the general population. Owing to the extremely busy environment in the clinics, difficulties were encountered in keeping track of the number of women whom the nurses approached, and the response rate was therefore unavailable.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

With the introduction of the universal two-child policy, there is a need to enhance fertility awareness and to encourage reproductive life planning, as well as to lower the cost of childcare, in order to increase the birth rate in China. Effort is required to make childbearing more compatible with current employment, career and educational development, the burdens of family care (e.g. for elderly parents), social environments and cultural expectations. This is particularly relevant for families who already have a child, as our findings show that their hesitation toward a second child was largely related to difficulties with extra childcare within the woman's current work and family life.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Elective single versus double embryo transfer: live birth outcome and patient acceptance in a prospective randomised trial

The purpose of this study was to determine which strategy of embryo transfer has a better trade-off in live birth delivery rate versus multiple pregnancy considering patient acceptance: elective single embryo transfer (eSET) or elective double embryo transfer (eDET). In all, 199 women <38 years of age undergoing their first IVF treatment in a private centre were included in a prospective open-label randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised into four groups: (1) eSET on Day 3; (2) eSET on Day 5; (3) eDET on Day 3; and (4) eDET on Day 5. Per patient, main analysis included acceptance of assigned group, as well as multiple and live birth delivery rates of the fresh cycle. Secondary analysis included the rates of subsequent cryotransfers and the theoretical cumulative success rate. Of 98 patients selected for eSET, 40% refused and preferred eDET. The live birth delivery rate after eDET was significantly higher after eDET versus eSET (65% vs 42%, respectively; odds ratio=1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.1). No multiple births were observed after eSET, compared with 35% after eDET. Although live birth delivery is higher with eDET, the increased risk of multiple births is avoided with eSET. Nearly half the patients refused eSET even after having been well informed about its benefits.

Two consecutive singleton pregnancies versus one twins pregnancy as preferred outcome of in vitro fertilization for mothers and infants: a retrospective case-control study

OBJECTIVE

Many infertile couples request a multiple embryo transfer because they desire more than one child. Based on this consideration, the current study aimed to compare the reproductive and perinatal outcomes of two consecutive singleton pregnancies versus one twin pregnancy in a large cohort of in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data from patients with clinical twin pregnancy after IVF fresh cycles and from patients with two consecutive IVF fresh cycles and clinical singleton pregnancy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Miscarriage rate, delivery rate, gestational age at birth, neonatal birth weight, and perinatal complications. A sub-analysis of data according to vanishing twin syndrome (VTS) was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 18,703 autologous fresh cycles were analyzed. One hundred seven patients had two consecutive singleton clinical pregnancies, whereas one clinical twin pregnancy occurred in 641 women. In patients who had two consecutive singleton clinical pregnancies the rates of overall pregnancies lost (odds ratio [OR] 4.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4, 6.9) and live births (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1, 0.3) were, respectively, higher and lower when compared to patients who had one clinical twin pregnancy. That data did not change after sub-analysis for VTS. The overall risk of perinatal complications was significantly higher in patients who had one twin delivery rather than patients who had two consecutive singleton deliveries (OR 31.8, 95% CI 14.1, 71.5). No difference between groups was detected in terms of intrauterine/neonatal deaths, perinatal mortality and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Data did not change after adjusting for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with two consecutive singleton pregnancies, twin pregnancies are characterized by higher success rates but worse perinatal outcomes irrespectively of VTS. Well designed prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm or rebut current retrospective findings.

Raising multiples: mental health of mothers and fathers in early parenthood

The rate of twin and higher-order gestation births has risen dramatically in recent decades in the United States as well as other Western countries. Although the obstetrical and neonatal risks of multiple gestation pregnancies are well-documented, much less is known regarding the mental health impact on parents of multiples during the perinatal and early parenthood period. Given that parents of multiples face greater functional demands, as well as other pressures (financial, medical) this population may be at risk for heightened distress. We conducted a systematic review of quantitative, English language studies that assessed mental health outcomes of parents of multiples during pregnancy, in the first postpartum year, and in the period of early parenthood, including depression, anxiety, stress, and related constructs. Twenty-seven articles published between 1989 and 2014 met selection criteria and were included in the review. Studies utilized a wide range of methods and outcome constructs, often making comparisons difficult. Although some studies found no differences, most investigations that compared mental health outcomes in parents of multiples versus parents of singletons found that parents of multiples experience heightened symptoms of depression, anxiety, and parenting stress. We discuss gaps in the existing body of literature on parental mental health related to multiple gestation birth and conclude by discussing the need for novel intervention strategies to meet the needs of this growing population. Parents of multiples may experience worse mental health outcomes than parents of singletons. More research is needed, and future work should explore potential treatment and support options.

The impact of the embryo quality on the risk of multiple pregnancies

The aim of the present study was to determine the chance of pregnancy and the risk of multiple pregnancies taking into account the number and quality of transferred embryos in patients >36 years old or ≤36 years old. For this study, 1497 patients undergoing intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in a private assisted reproduction centre were split into groups according to the number and quality of the transferred embryos on the third or fifth day of development. The pregnancy rate and multiple pregnancy rate were compared between the embryo quality groups in patients <36 years old or ≥36 years old. In patients <36 years old, for the day 3 embryo transfer, no significant difference was noted in the pregnancy rate when the groups were compared. However the multiple pregnancy rate was increased by the transfer of an extra low-quality embryo (17.1 versus 28.2%, P = 0.020). For day 5 embryo transfer, the transfer of an extra blastocyst significantly increased the pregnancy rate (36.0 versus 42.4%, P < 0.001) and the multiple pregnancy rate (4.4 versus 16.9%, P < 0.001). In older patients, no significant difference was noted in the pregnancy rate when the groups were compared. However, when an extra low-quality embryo was transferred, a significantly increased rate of multiple pregnancies was observed for day 3 (18.2 versus 26.4%, P = 0.049) and day 5 embryo transfers (5.2 versus 16.1%, P < 0.001). In conclusion, the transfer of an extra low-quality embryo may increase the risk of a multiple pregnancy. In younger patients, the transfer of an extra low-quality blastocyst may also increase the chance of pregnancy.

The Desire for Multiple Pregnancy among Patients with Infertility and Their Partners

Objective. To study the predictors for desire for multiple pregnancies and the influence of providing information regarding the maternal and fetal complications associated with multiple pregnancies on their preference for multiple pregnancies. Methods. Couples attending an infertility clinic were offered to fill up a questionnaire separately. Following this, they were handed a pamphlet with information regarding the risks associated with multiple pregnancies. The patients will then be required to answer the question on the number of pregnancies desired again. Results. Two hundred fifty three out of 300 respondents completed the questionnaires adequately. A higher proportion of respondents, 60.3% of females and 57.9% of males, prefer singleton pregnancy. Patients who are younger than 35 years, with preexisting knowledge of risks associated with multiple pregnancies and previous treatment for infertility, have decreased desire for multiple pregnancies. However, for patients who are older than 35, with longer duration of infertility, and those patients who have preexisting knowledge of the increased risk, providing further information regarding the risks did not change their initial preferences. Conclusion. Providing and reinforcing knowledge on the risks to mother and fetus associated with multiple pregnancies did not decrease the preference for multiple pregnancies in patients.

The "graying" of infertility services: an impending revolution nobody is ready for

BACKGROUND

As demand for infertility services by older women continues to grow, because achievable in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes are widely underestimated, most fertility centers do not offer maximal treatment options with use of autologous oocytes. Limited data suggest that clinical IVF outcomes in excess of what the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) considers "futile" can, likely, be achieved up to at least age 45 years.

METHODS

In an attempt to point out an evolving demographic trend in IVF, we here report our center's IVF data for 2010-2012 and national U.S. data for 1997-2010. Though our center's data are representative of only one IVF center's patients, they, likely, are unique since they probably represent the most adversely selected IVF patient population ever reported and, thus, are predictive of future demographic trends. In addition we performed a systematic review of the literature on the subject based on PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar searches till year-end 2013. The literature search was performed using key words and phrases relevant to fertility treatments in older women.

RESULTS

As demonstrated by our center's patient demographics and national U.S. data, IVF centers are destined to treat increasingly adversely selected patients. Despite our center's already extremely adversely selected patient population, age-specific IVF cycle outcomes in women above age 40 years, nevertheless, exceeded criteria for "futility" by the ASRM and widely quoted outcome expectations in the literature for patient ages. Age 43 discriminates between better and poorer clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.

CONCLUSIONS

"Graying" of the infertility populations in the developed world, a problem with potentially far-reaching medical and societal consequences, has so far been only insufficiently addressed in the literature. As women's postmenopausal life spans already exceed postmenarcheal life spans at the start of the 20th century, the "graying" of infertility services can be expected to further accelerate, no longer as in recent decades bringing only women in their 40s into maternity wards but also women in their 50s and 60s. Medicine and society better get ready for this revolution.

Mistaken advocacy against twin pregnancies following IVF

PURPOSE

A recent publication by Swedish Colleagues in Fertility & Sterility for the first time, statistically correctly, attempted to assess risks of twin IVF pregnancies in comparison to two consecutive singleton IVF pregnancies. Historic comparisons have been statistically incorrect, comparing risks of one twin to one singleton pregnancy. We here analyze data and conclusions presented in this Swedish study.

METHODS

We reviewed the manuscript by Sazonova et al. (Fertil Steril, 2013) (doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.023 ).

RESULTS

Based on incorrect statistical methodology, twins after in vitro fertilization (IVF) have come under attack as "adverse" outcomes. Above noted study recently, for the first time, correctly compared one twin to two consecutive singleton pregnancies. Investigators, however, in our opinion interpreted their own data incorrectly by claiming "dramatically" higher maternal and neonatal risks in twin pregnancies. Our interpretation of reported data, indeed, in contrast suggests surprisingly minor differences in observed twin-risks. Moreover, such minor risk increases do not offer adequate compensatory benefits for significantly lower pregnancy chances in first IVF cycles with eSET in comparison to two-embryo transfers (2-ET).

CONCLUSIONS

As significantly higher maternal and neonatal risks of twin IVF pregnancies represent the principal rationale for eSET, the Swedish study actually suggests that eSET offers neither patient-friendly nor cost-effective treatment options for IVF, except where patients object to twins or have medical contraindications. The need for a second pregnancy to achieve equal outcome (2 children), resulting treatment delays, increased efforts and costs, in absence of any guarantees that a second successful singleton pregnancy/delivery will ever be accomplished, invalidates eSET as a routine procedure.

Comparison of Child-rearing Problems Between Mothers with Multiple Children who Conceived after Infertility Treatment and Mothers with Multiple Children who Conceived Spontaneously

The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristic child-rearing problems for mothers of multiple children who conceived after infertility treatment as compared to mothers of multiple children who conceived spontaneously. The subjects were 990 mothers of multiple children: 359 who conceived after infertility treatment and 631 who conceived spontaneously. Mothers who conceived after infertility treatment were more delighted when informed of a multiple pregnancy than those who conceived spontaneously. In addition, with respect to anxiety during twin pregnancies, mothers of twins who conceived after infertility treatment showed lower rates of anxiety about nursing the infants and economic concerns than those of twins who conceived spontaneously. However, after delivery, mothers who conceived after infertility treatment showed a higher rate of depressive symptoms than those who conceived spontaneously. After adjusting for each associated factor using logistic regression, the risk of depressive symptoms in mothers who conceived after infertility treatment was significantly associated with disabled multiple children and the methods for alleviating stress. The odds ratio indicated that mothers with at least one disabled child were twice as likely to have depressive symptoms as mothers with no disabled children. Furthermore, the odds ratio indicated that mothers who used no methods for alleviating stress were twice as likely to have depressive symptoms than those who did.

The use of single embryo transfer to reduce the incidence of twins: Implications and questions for practice from the 'towardSET?' project

In vitro fertilisation treatments where multiple embryos are transferred are associated with high multiple birth rates leading to a corresponding high infant morbidity. Here we review the results from a multidisciplinary project which aimed to combine state of the art statistical modelling of routine clinical data with consideration of patient perspectives to explore options for reducing multiple birth incidence by increased use of single embryo transfer (SET). Modelling was based on a large multicentre cohort, supplemented by analysis of HFEA register data. Patient perspectives were explored in qualitative interviews and focus groups. The data confirm the reduction of around one-third in the chance of a live birth for any couple in moving from double embryo transfer (DET) to SET in a fresh cycle. This can be somewhat offset by appropriate patient and cycle selection for SET, with many suggested schemes performing similarly, although many patients perceive such selection as unfair. If we take a complete cycle perspective, and consider the transfer of all good-quality embryos with cryopreservation then it is possible for SET to match or even outperform DET. However, the additional treatment cycles are seen by patients as physically and emotionally burdensome. Such treatments will require optimisation of embryo freezing policies and a number of options are explored.

Eliminating multiple pregnancies: an appropriate target for government intervention?

The manuscript in this issue of the journal by Bissonette et al. reports on a new government-sponsored intervention into the practice of IVF within the province of Quebec, Canada, which in the authors' opinion highly successfully reduced twinning rates, while maintaining overall acceptable pregnancy rates. Given the opportunity to comment, their manuscript, in my opinion, only reemphasizes why, despite wide professional support, the concept of single embryo transfer (SET) is: (i) damaging to most infertility patients by reducing pregnancy chances; (ii) does so without compensatory benefits; (iii) impinges on patients' rights to self-determination; (iv) has significant negative impact on IVF-generated birth rates; and (v) thus, demonstrating, once more, that governments should not interfere with the patient-physician relationships.

Reducing multiple pregnancies after assisted reproduction treatment: Québec says 'Yes, we can!'

Multiple pregnancy (MP) is widely recognized as the single biggest risk to children born as a result of assisted reproduction treatment. There is an emerging trend in Europe and Canada to promote single-embryo transfer (SET). In this issue, Gleicher argues that twin pregnancies should not be seen as an unfavourable outcome of assisted reproduction treatment. He argues that SET policies 'make no sense' since they will aggravate already unsatisfactory population growth in some countries. He also argues that governmental intervention to impose SET policies, despite proving successful in reducing MP, are inappropriate. The overwhelming evidence in the literature indicates that his opinion is not supported by credible data. Views should be based on solid data rather than personal judgement. Governmental interventions to reduce twin pregnancies, as demonstrated previously in Belgium and now in Québec, have been successful. The risks of twin pregnancies are real and borne by women and children, not their doctors. Doctors managing infertile couples are no longer entitled to take risks with the health of the next generation.

During IVF treatment patient preference shifts from singletons towards twins but only a few patients show an actual reversal of preference

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of patients' preferences for elective single embryo transfer (eSET) or double embryo transfer (DET) and for singletons or twins is of great importance in counselling for embryo transfer (ET) strategies. In this study, the stability of IVF patients' preferences over time for either a healthy single child or healthy twins was measured and we investigated which factors could explain preference shifts.

METHODS

Infertile women (n = 177) who participated in an RCT comparing one cycle eSET with one cycle DET were included. A satisfaction questionnaire was developed to measure patient preferences and attitudes at two moments in time, i.e. at 2 weeks before ET and at 2 weeks following ET, after the results of the pregnancy test. Regression analysis examined the effect of several variables on preference shifts.

RESULTS

Before ET, most patients expressed a preference for a singleton, whereas most patients were indifferent 2 weeks after ET, resulting in an overall preference shift towards twins (P = 0.002; n = 145). Overall, 62% of patients showed a preference shift. Preference shifts were explained by patients' global satisfaction of the information given by the fertility clinic staff received by the fertility clinic staff, and an interaction between the occurrence of pregnancy and transfer policy (eSET or DET).

CONCLUSIONS

In general, patients' preferences for a singleton or twins are not stable during IVF treatment. Possible explanations of a shift in preference are that pregnant patients attuned their preferences to what they expect their pregnancy to result in, whereas non-pregnant patients shifted towards a preference for twins in order to be able to fulfil their ultimate child wish.

Comparing patients' and clinicians' perceptions of elective single embryo transfer using the attitudes to a twin IVF pregnancy scale (ATIPS)

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated a questionnaire originally developed for use with health professionals to explore and compare patients' and clinicians' perceptions of elective single embryo transfer and twin births.

METHODS

IVF clinicians and patients attending an independent Fertility clinic were surveyed using the Attitudes to a twin birth scale (ATIPS) comprising two subscales: attitudes to twins (A-Twin) and attitudes to elective single embryo transfer (A-SET). After refinement total sample scores showed both subscales were reliable with Cronbach's alpha >0.8 and item-total correlations >0.35.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were completed by 100 female IVF patients and 17 IVF clinicians. A-Twin subscale scores indicated neither the IVF clinicians nor female IVF patients demonstrated very positive attitudes to a twin birth although the IVF female patients were more in favour (t = 5.29, n = 117, p = <0.001). Responses suggest both groups would benefit from increased information about the risks of a twin birth for the baby. First cycle IVF female patients were significantly more positive about eSET (z = 3.94, n = 100, p =  <0.001). Clinicians perceive both their colleagues' and female patients' negativity towards eSET; suggesting a role for education.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found the ATIPS to be a reliable measure which could be useful in evaluating interventions to promote single embryo transfer.

Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review

The problems associated with twin and higher order pregnancies have assumed major importance, with international debate about multiple pregnancy; the single biggest risk with in vitro fertilisation (IVF). We have critically reviewed published papers on female patients' and their partners' views of single embryo transfer (SET) and twin or higher level pregnancies to identify the requirements needed to improve the acceptability of SET. Twenty relevant papers were identified and included in the review. Although the majority of IVF patients and their partners, in the more recent studies, exhibited a desire for twins rather than singletons, closer examination of the evidence revealed that elective SET (eSET) could become increasingly acceptable. As success rates of IVF have improved and the risks and consequences of multiple pregnancies are well-documented, patients have accepted the transfer of two rather than three embryos as standard practice. However, more would accept eSET if success rates approached those of double embryo transfer (DET). This emphasises the importance of improving success rates of eSET so that more patients can achieve a singleton birth with one IVF cycle. If patients were offered only SET, it is likely that this would be acceptable as the normal expectation of pregnancy is one baby. Measures to improve the acceptability of SET include: using eSET, especially with younger patients; including partners when providing risk information; improving eSET success rates; improving outcomes with cryopreserved embryos; changing reimbursement/free cycles to favour eSET; using legal enforcement.

Single embryo transfer in clinical practice

The high incidence of multiple pregnancies is the main reason for adverse treatment outcome in assisted reproduction. A good strategy to avoid multiple pregnancies is elective single embryo transfer and cryopreservation of spare embryos. Important factors in an elective single embryo transfer programme are good counselling of the patients and the selection of embryos with high implantation potential. In the infertility clinic at Helsinki University Central Hospital the elective single embryo transfer programme was started in 1997 and in 2000 the transfer policy turned to single embryo transfer as primary option. In 2003 60% of fresh transfers were elective single embryo transfers and 66% of frozen transfers were single embryo transfers. It has been shown that an elective single embryo transfer programme can be adopted in daily practice and that it decreases the multiple pregnancy rate, in our programme to around 7% with acceptable overall pregnancy and delivery rates. In Finland the increased use of single embryo transfer has reduced the proportion of multiple births. Finally, a good cryopreservation programme is essential to achieve a good cumulative delivery rate without multiple pregnancies.

A cost-benefit analysis of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for carrier couples of cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a cost-benefit analysis of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for carrier couples of cystic fibrosis (CF) compared with the alternative of natural conception (NC) followed by prenatal testing and termination of affected pregnancies.

DESIGN

Cost-benefit analysis using a decision analytic model.

SETTING

Outpatient reproductive health practices.

PATIENT(S)

A simulated cohort of 1,000 female patients.

INTERVENTION(S)

We calculated the net benefit of giving birth to a child as the present value of lifetime earnings minus lifetime medical costs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Net benefits in dollars.

RESULT(S)

When used for women younger than 35 years of age, the net benefit of PGD over NC was $182,000 ($715,000 vs. $532,000, respectively). For women aged 35-40 years, the net benefit of PGD over NC was $114,000 ($634,000 vs. $520,000, respectively). For women older than 40 years, however, the net benefit of PGD over NC was -$148,000 ($302,000 vs. $450,000, respectively).

CONCLUSION(S)

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis provides net economic benefits when used by carrier couples of CF. Although there is an upper limit of maternal age at which economic benefit can be demonstrated, carrier couples of CF should be offered PGD for prevention of an affected child.

Single-embryo transfer reduces clinical pregnancy rates and live births in fresh IVF and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It has become an accepted procedure to transfer more than one embryo to the patient to achieve acceptable ongoing pregnancy rates. However, transfers of more than a single embryo increase the probability of establishing a multiple gestation. Single-embryo transfer can minimize twin pregnancies but may also lower live birth rates. This meta-analysis aimed to compare current data on single-embryo versus double-embryo transfer in fresh IVF/ICSI cycles with respect to implantation, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates.

METHODS

Search strategies included on-line surveys of databases from 1995 to 2008. Data management and analysis were conducted using the Stats Direct statistical software. The fixed-effect model was used for odds ratio (OR). Fixed-effect effectiveness was evaluated by the Mantel Haenszel method. Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

When pooling results under the fixed-effect model, the implantation rate was not significantly different between double-embryo transfer (34.5%) and single-embryo transfer group (34.7%) (P = 0.96; OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.78, 1.25). On the other hand, double-embryo transfer produced a statistically significantly higher ongoing clinical pregnancy rate (44.5%) than single-embryo transfer (28.3%) (P < 0.0001; OR:2.06, 95% CI = 1.64,2.60). At the same time, pooling results presented a significantly higher live birth rate when double-embryo transfer (42.5%) (P < 0.001; OR: 1.87, 95% CI = 1.44,2.42) was compared with single-embryo transfer (28.4%).

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis with 95% confidence showed that, despite similar implantation rates, fresh double-embryo transfer had a 1.64 to 2.60 times greater ongoing pregnancy rate and 1.44 to 2.42 times greater live birth rate than single-embryo transfer in a population suitable for ART treatment.

Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efforts to reduce twin pregnancies through progressive implementation of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) among select patients over a 6-year period.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Private practice IVF center.

PATIENT(S)

Infertile women undergoing 15,418 consecutive IVF-ET cycles.

INTERVENTION(S)

IVF-ET, including blastocyst-stage eSET among select patients with good prognosis and high risk of multiple pregnancy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, method of payment.

RESULT(S)

Pregnancy rates were similar for autologous eSET versus double-blastocyst transfer (65% vs. 63%), while twin rates were much lower (1% vs. 44%). For recipients of donor oocytes, pregnancy rates were slightly lower with eSET (63% vs. 74%), while twin rates were much lower (2% vs. 54%). There was no decrease in overall pregnancy rates, despite a dramatic rise in eSET use over time (1.5% to 8.6% of all autologous transfers and 2.0% to 22.5% of all transfers to donor oocyte recipients between 2002 and 2007). Overall singleton pregnancy rates increased, while twin pregnancy rates declined significantly over time. Use of eSET was significantly more common among patients with insurance coverage or who were participating in our Shared Risk money-back guarantee program.

CONCLUSION(S)

Selective eSET use among good-prognosis patients can significantly reduce twin pregnancies without compromising pregnancy rates. Patients are more likely to choose eSET when freed from financial pressures to transfer multiple embryos.

The effects of competition on assisted reproductive technology outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between competition among fertility clinics and assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment outcomes, particularly multiple births.

DESIGN

Using clinic-level data from 1995 to 2001, we examined the relationship between competition and clinic-level ART outcomes and practice patterns.

SETTING

National database registry.

PATIENT(S)

Clinics performing ART.

INTERVENTION(S)

The number of clinics within a 20-mile (32.19-km) radius of a given clinic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinic-level births, singleton births, and multiple births per ART cycle; multiple births per ART birth; average number of embryos transferred per cycle; and the proportion of cycles for women under age 35 years.

RESULT(S)

The number of competing clinics is not strongly associated with ART birth and multiple birth rates. Relative to clinics with no competitors, the rate of multiple births per cycle is lower (-0.03 percentage points) only for clinics with more than 15 competitors. Embryo transfer practices are not statistically significantly associated with the number of competitors. Clinic-level competition is strongly associated with patient mix. The proportion of cycles for patients under 35 years old is 6.4 percentage points lower for clinics with more than 15 competitors than for those with no competitors.

CONCLUSION(S)

Competition among fertility clinics does not appear to increase rates of multiple births from ART by promoting more aggressive embryo transfer decisions.

Factors and perceptions that influence women's decisions to have a single embryo transferred

The aim of this study was to identify factors that inhibit or promote the adoption of single embryo transfer (SET). A cohort of 163 women patients receiving IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, comprising 87 women choosing SET and 63 women choosing double embryo transfer (DET), were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. The data were compared using logistic regression analysis. Confidence in the chance of pregnancy with SET, younger age and first treatment were predictive of a decision for SET. Preference for a healthy and singleton pregnancy was predictive but perceptions of the incidence or risk of multiple gestation were not. Factors such as a sense of time urgency and past experience of treatment were significant and predictive of diminished choice of SET. The clinic doctor was an important influencing factor. The results of this study confirm that improved pregnancy rates in SET coupled with an official clinic policy to promote SET in younger, first cycle patients influenced many women to choose SET. However, repeated treatment, advancing age and urgency to become pregnant are factors that moderate a woman's choice for SET.

Redefining in vitro fertilization success: should triplets be considered failures?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how the ranking of IVF programs changes if high-order multiple pregnancies (HOMPs) are considered negative outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

The 2004 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System.

PATIENT(S)

Two hundred seven programs that performed >50 IVF cycles were analyzed, and only patients <or=35 years of age were included.

INTERVENTION(S)

Program size, success rate, and number of embryos transferred were recorded for each program. All programs were ranked in accordance to these variables.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The programs were re-ranked after considering HOMPs as negative, rather than as positive, outcomes.

RESULT(S)

High-order multiple pregnancies were more abundant as the number of embryos replaced increased. The live birth rate, after excluding HOMPs, significantly decreased as the number of embryos transferred increased. The lowest ranked programs performed transfers with the greatest number of embryos (2.4-4.5). After HOMP exclusion, the rank of programs that transferred >2.4 embryos decreased, as opposed to the programs that transferred fewer embryos (1.8-2.4).

CONCLUSION(S)

Reclassifying HOMPs as failed cycles will result in a reduced rank in programs that maintain high embryo replacements. Redefining success as a singleton or twin birth significantly changes the ranking order of programs and, potentially, how programs are perceived.

Safety versus success in elective single embryo transfer: women's preferences for outcomes of in vitro fertilisation

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether women waiting to undergo in vitro fertilisation (IVF) view adverse outcomes associated with twin pregnancy as more desirable than having no pregnancy at all.

DESIGN

Women's preference values for five adverse birth outcomes associated with twin pregnancy were compared with their preference value for treatment failure (TF), i.e. no pregnancy at all.

SETTING

Aberdeen Fertility Centre, University of Aberdeen, UK.

POPULATION

A total of 74 women waiting to undergo IVF.

METHODS

The standard gamble method was used to elicit women's preference values for giving birth to a child with physical impairments (PI), cognitive impairments (CI), or visual impairments (VI), perinatal death (PD) without a subsequent pregnancy, premature delivery (PremD), and TF (no pregnancy).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preference values were elicited on a scale where 1 represents giving birth to a healthy child and 0 represents immediate death.

RESULTS

The median preference values for having a child with PI, CI, or VI were 0.940, 0.970, and 0.975, respectively. The median values for PremD, PD, and TF were 0.955, 0.725, and 0.815, respectively. Having no child at all was valued significantly lower than having a child with PI, CI, or VI (P < 0.01) but significantly higher than PD (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Some women waiting for IVF treatment view severe child disability outcomes associated with double embryo transfer as being more desirable than having no child at all. Women embarking on IVF may be influenced more strongly by considerations of 'treatment success' rather than future risks to their offspring.

A 47-year-old woman with fertility problems who desires a multiple pregnancy

Mrs Z is a 47-year-old woman with long-standing infertility who is about to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF) using donor oocytes from an anonymous donor. She has already undergone an IVF cycle with her own oocytes and an IVF cycle using donor oocytes from a known donor without a successful pregnancy. Mrs Z has been advised by her infertility physician to consider the transfer of a single embryo, but she does not wish to decrease her likelihood of conception, and, after her long and expensive infertility saga, wishes to conceive twins. The science of IVF has evolved significantly in the last several years, increasing the likelihood of successful pregnancy and reducing the need to transfer more than 1 embryo with its inherent risks of multiple pregnancy. The state of the science and why patients may continue to want multiple embryos transferred, including costs and lack of insurance coverage for infertility treatments, are discussed.

Incidence and complications of multiple gestation in Canada: proceedings of an expert meeting

This paper reports the proceedings of a consensus meeting on the incidence and complications of multiple gestation in Canada. In addition to background presentations about current and possible future practice in Canada, the expert panel also developed a set of consensus points. The need for infertility to be understood, and funded, as a healthcare problem was emphasized, along with recognition of the emotional impact of infertility. It was agreed that the goal of assisted reproduction treatment is the delivery of a single healthy infant and that even though many positive outcomes have resulted from twin or even triplet pregnancies, the potential risks associated with multiple pregnancy require that every effort be made to achieve this goal. The evidence shows that treatments other than IVF (such as superovulation and clomiphene citrate) contribute significantly to the incidence of multiple pregnancy. There is an urgent need for studies to understand better the usage and application of these other fertility technologies within Canada, as well as the non-financial barriers to treatment. The final consensus of the expert panel was that with adequate funding and good access to treatment, it will be possible to achieve the goal of reducing IVF-related multiple pregnancy rates in Canada by 50%.

Is twin pregnancy necessarily an adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies?

It has recently been suggested that the measure of success of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) should be the birth of a singleton baby, whereas a twin pregnancy should be considered as a complication. Although the maternal and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies are significantly higher than those in singleton pregnancies, the classification of a twin pregnancy as a complication of ART is in our opinion debatable. Most twin pregnancies result in the birth of two healthy babies, with little or no complication for the mother, and only few twin pregnancies results in serious morbidity of the mother and of one or both of the children. The crux of our arguments is that one should consider those cases as poor outcomes and not a twin pregnancy per se.

The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer

The option of single embryo transfer (SET) has recently dominated the pages of this and other medical journals. Opinions, in regards to the utility of such an approach, appear to differ between Europe and the US. While US guidelines promote a more individualized approach, European opinions, at times, even advocate mandated practice patterns. The European approach, however, fails to recognize the rather significant differences in supportive arguments between the historical switch from multiple embryo transfers to 2-embryo transfers and the current discussion, favouring a switch from 2-embryo transfer to elective (e)-SET. In the former, a significant risk of (at times, high-order) multiple pregnancies was reduced without loss of pregnancy potential. In the latter, a comparably relatively low twinning risk is reduced at the expense of declining pregnancy rates, a need for more treatment cycles, a potential delay in treatment success and, potentially, higher treatment costs. These consequences of e-SET, together with the preference of some infertility patients to actually conceive twins, raise serious questions about the wide utilization of e-SET, as has been propagated by many authorities. According to US guidelines, e-SET, therefore, appears to represent an appropriate transfer option for only a small minority of IVF patients. Argument in favour of indiscriminate SET appears unrealistic and should be reconsidered.

IVF results: optimize not maximize

The desire to improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) results has led clinicians to replace more than 1 embryo in the uterus. As a result, multiple births have increased over the last 2 decades to epidemic proportions, exposing the field of assisted conception to justified criticism. This review aims to ensure that physicians involved in the field of fertility treatment are aware of the risks and complications related to multiple pregnancies, and to explore possible strategies such as blastocyst culture, preimplantation genetic screening, and embryo cryopreservation, which can help to control and reverse the tide of multiple pregnancies without reducing the good success rate that modern IVF treatment enjoys. A brief overview of the respective UK legislative system is also presented.

Behavioral and cognitive development as well as family functioning of twins conceived by assisted reproduction: findings from a large population study

OBJECTIVE

To establish the nature and extent of difficulties in parenting and child development in families with twins conceived by assisted reproduction.

DESIGN

Comparisons were carried out between a representative sample of 344 families with 2- to 5-year-old twins conceived by IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and a matched comparison group of 344 families with singletons from IVF/ICSI. One twin was randomly selected for data analysis to avoid the bias associated with nonindependence of measures.

SETTING

A general population sample of IVF/ICSI families.

PATIENT(S)

Mothers and children.

INTERVENTION(S)

Mothers completed a questionnaire booklet.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Standardized measures of the mother's psychological well-being (parenting stress, depression, and quality of marriage) and standardized measures of the child's psychological development (emotional/behavioral problems and cognitive development).

RESULT(S)

Mothers of twins showed significantly higher levels of parenting stress and depression than mothers of singletons and were significantly more likely to find parenting difficult and significantly less likely to obtain pleasure from their child. Regarding the children, there was no difference in the level of emotional or behavioral problems between twins and singletons. However, twins showed significantly lower levels of cognitive functioning.

CONCLUSION(S)

Greater difficulties in parenting and child development were experienced by IVF/ICSI families with twins than by IVF/ICSI families with singletons.

IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention

Since the 1970s, the national twin birth rates have been increasing worldwide. Apart from the increasing childbearing age, the main cause is the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). To explore the overall consequences of dual embryo transfer (DET), the literature has been reviewed systematically regarding short- and long-term outcomes of IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies i.e. pregnancy complications, maternal risks, obstetric outcome and long-term morbidity including neurological sequelae, cognitive development and family implications. Another consequence of DET is vanishing twins, which seems to be a possible cause of adverse outcome in IVF singletons. The sparse literature on vanishing twins in IVF pregnancies and the influence on the surviving co-twin were also addressed. Finally, to determine the effects of implementing elective single embryo transfer (eSET), trials concerning eSET versus DET were analysed. In the light of the steadily increasing twin birth rates and the findings in this overview, where IVF/ICSI twins carry adverse outcome, it should be emphasized that the major obstacle in IVF remains the high twin birth rate. Furthermore vanishing twins account for another hazard of DET. These problems can be resolved by implementing eSET, diminishing the twin birth rate without affecting the overall goal of achieving a healthy infant.

Investigation of staff and patients’ opinions of a proposed trial of elective single embryo transfer

BACKGROUND

In the context of mounting concern about the risks of twin pregnancies resulting from IVF, this study aimed to assess staff and patients' attitudes towards a proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) of elective single embryo transfer (SET) in a Scottish fertility centre.

METHODS

The views of 10 members of IVF clinic staff were assessed by means of a focus group and those of 12 couples by semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

Staff were aware of the risks of twin pregnancies to mothers and babies and the need for evidence of success in SET, but had reservations about the proposed RCT. The need to subject patients to unpopular scientific procedures such as randomization and blinding conflicted with their perceived caring role. They felt it would be hard to recruit and onerous to patients but nevertheless discussed how it could be successfully mounted if necessary. They debated how to ensure that consent was fully informed, and when, and how, to randomize. Patients accepted the possibility of twins but were largely unaware of risks inherent in twin pregnancies. They saw no need for a trial and found the idea of randomization unacceptable except in younger women. They would accept SET if it became unit policy and appeared unaffected by financial considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

Involving affected staff at the design stage may make it easier to conduct a SET trial in their clinics. IVF patients whose ultimate goal is pregnancy are less likely to support a trial which aims to minimize twin pregnancies.

Psychosocial risks associated with multiple births resulting from assisted reproduction

OBJECTIVE

To determine if increased psychosocial risks are associated with each increase in birth multiplicity (i.e., singleton, twin, triplet) resulting from assisted reproduction.

DESIGN

Stratified random sample (n = 249).

SETTING

An academic teaching hospital and private practice infertility center.

PATIENT(S)

Mothers raising 1- to 4-year-old children (n = 128 singletons, n = 111 twins, and n = 10 triplets) conceived through assisted reproduction.

INTERVENTION(S)

Self-administered, mailed survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Scales measuring material needs, quality of life, social stigma, depression, stress, and marital satisfaction.

RESULT(S)

Using multivariate logistic regression models, for each additional multiple birth child, the odds of having difficulty meeting basic material needs more than tripled and the odds of lower quality of life and increased social stigma more than doubled. Each increase in multiplicity was also associated with increased risks of maternal depression.

CONCLUSION(S)

To increase patients' informed decision-making, assisted reproduction providers might consider incorporating a discussion of these risks with all patients before they begin fertility treatment, and holding the discussion again if the treatment results in a multiple gestation. These data may also help providers to identify appropriate counseling, depression screening, and supports for patients with multiple births.

En Route to an “Instant Family”: Psychosocial Considerations

Societal and cultural norms require that a worthwhile person engage in reproduction and formation of a family. Young adults who postpone childbearing may presume that fertility is granted. When all other measures fail, the use of assisted reproductive technologies is considered the ultimate salvation for these couples. It is highly stressful and may lead to significant negative psychological consequences (loss of self-esteem, confidence, health, close relationships, security, and hope). Assisted reproductive technology may produce multiple pregnancy, which is frequently overlooked or underappreciated by infertile couples. Despite the real risks associated with a multiple pregnancy and birth, infertile patients often express a desperate wish to have twins or triplets, thereby accomplishing an instant family. It is necessary to provide these couples with detailed information on the risks of multiple pregnancy and birth.

Use of a prediction model for high-order multiple implantation after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins

OBJECTIVE

To determine prospectively the effectiveness in clinical practice of a prediction model for high-order multiple pregnancies (HOMP) (triplets or more).

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Eight hundred forty-nine consecutive infertile patients undergoing a total of 1,542 treatment cycles.

INTERVENTION(S)

Gonadotropin ovarian stimulation or induction of ovulation without IVF MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Observed and predicted overall pregnancy rates and the incidence of HOMP.

RESULT(S)

The use of the prediction model (implying cancellation of all cycles at high risk for HOMP) would result in an 8% (95% confidence interval, 6.8%-9.2%) reduction of overall pregnancy rate but also in a 285% (95% CI, 279%-291%) reduction of HOMP.

CONCLUSION(S)

By using our prediction model, it was possible to maintain a low risk of HOMP with a good pregnancy rate in patients receiving gonadotropin ovarian stimulation or induction of ovulation without IVF.