Pre-clinical evaluation of contraceptive steroids: regulatory requirements and scientific expectations

History of chronic toxicity and animal carcinogenicity studies for pharmaceuticals

During the 20th century, as drug products were being developed to treat both known and emerging human diseases and conditions, determining the safety of these new chemicals became of increasing importance and necessity. For a time, the safety of use in human populations was of question, let alone whether the drug product was truly effective. As such, US and international regulatory agencies have played a major role in establishing standardized testing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug products. Pharmacologic and toxicologic evaluation of a new drug in animals is an important part of the pharmaceutical development process prior to its first-time use in humans, as well as its potential chronic use in affected populations. Just as both science and technology have evolved over the past century and further, so have the guidelines that have been put forth to adequately and efficiently evaluate the toxicity of new drugs and their subsequent safety in humans. This review summarizes the historical highlights of the conduct of drug safety evaluations in animals, particularly with regard to chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity assessments, and how we have progressed to our current standards and protocols to ensure safe use of drug products in human populations.

Comparative aspects of contraceptive steroids--effects observed in beagle dogs

The effects of oral contraceptives have been studied in the beagle bitch for periods up to 7 yr. High doses of these potent estrogen: progestogen (E:P) combinations have been shown to promote tumors in the mammary glands, smooth muscle of the tubular genitalia, and occasionally in the transitional epithelium of the neck/trigone area of the urinary bladder. The contraceptive formulations used in humans are balanced with an E:P ratio of about 1:5 to 1:80 to produce a desired decidual response in the uterus. The corresponding ratio for producing the decidual reaction in the dog is 1:1,000 to 1:3,000 with the result that the dog is grossly overdosed with estrogens when given the human formulation at the usual multiples of up to 25 times the human dose. Smooth muscle tumors of the tubular reproductive tract are common sequelae to estrogen overstimulation in the dog and are known to occur in other species, including the humans. The dog also has major differences in hormonal control and sensitivity when compared to humans. Progestogens stimulate synthesis and release of growth hormone (GH) in dogs which in turn is the major stimulant (with progestogens) of mammary growth and tumors. Evidence is accumulating which indicates that most if not all progestogens can produce mammary tumors in the dog if given by the correct route and at high enough dosage. In contrast, GH in humans is not increased nor does it have any significant mammotrophic role. Mammary tumors in dogs related to oral contraceptives are now widely considered to be irrelevant as a model or predictor for human tumors. Transitional cell tumors in the urinary bladder seem to be a species specific phenomenon seen on occasion in the dog, but not in the rat, monkey, or human. The usual location in the neck/trigone area may be related to the embryologic origin of this portion of the bladder, which derives from tissues more closely related to the genital organs than does the rest of the bladder.

Guidelines and requirements for the evaluation of contraceptive steroids

Since their introduction in the early 1960s, the oral contraceptive (OCs) steroids have been subjected to preclinical and clinical investigations unprecedented in medical history. As a result of such extensive studies, it is now possible to make a comprehensive review of preclinical and clinical data on oral contraceptives. The OCs were introduced at a time when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was undergoing drastic changes as a result of the thalidomide tragedy, the introduction of the Kefauver-Harris Amendment, and the desire for greater control over the pharmaceutical industry. The initial requirements for the safety evaluation of OCs were identical to those of other drugs. There were no explicit requirements for OCs although it was generally felt that the requirements should be more stringent because the OCs were being used in otherwise healthy women for long periods of time and with minimal medical supervision. In the 1960s when it became apparent from ongoing studies that there was an increased incidence of mammary tumors in dogs treated with some progestins, the FDA made the decision to terminate clinical studies and established the requirement for 7- and 10-yr studies in dogs and monkeys, respectively. The primary purpose of this paper is to present an historical perspective of the evolution of the preclinical requirements for the evaluation of the safety of OCs prior to their use in the various phases (I, II, III) of clinical trials. Some proposed changes in the requirements are discussed. This information will form the basis for other presentations dealing with the safety assessment of OCs in rats, dogs, and monkeys.