Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography

Proteomic Profiling Identifies Candidate Diagnostic Biomarkers of Hydrosalpinx in Endometrial Fluid: A Pilot Study

Hydrosalpinx is a fluid occlusion and distension of the fallopian tubes, often resulting from pelvic inflammatory disease, which reduces the success of artificial reproductive technologies (ARTs) by 50%. Tubal factors account for approximately 25% of infertility cases, but their underlying molecular mechanisms and functional impact on other reproductive tissues remain poorly understood. This proteomic profiling study applied sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS) to study hydrosalpinx cyst fluid and pre- and post-salpingectomy endometrial fluid. Among the 967 proteins identified, we found 19 and 17 candidate biomarkers for hydrosalpinx in pre- and post-salpingectomy endometrial fluid, respectively. Salpingectomy significantly affected 76 endometrial proteins, providing insights into the enhanced immune response and inflammation present prior to intervention, and enhanced coagulation cascades and wound healing processes occurring one month after intervention. These findings confirmed that salpingectomy reverses the hydrosalpinx-related functional impairments in the endometrium and set a foundation for further biomarker validation and the development of less-invasive diagnostic strategies for hydrosalpinx.

Comparisons of different treatment outcomes in IVF/ET patients with hydrosalpinx: a retrospective study

AIMS

To explore suggestions for clinicians on the most effective treatment for hydrosalpinx undergoing IVF-ET.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 936 women with hydrosalpinx and 6715 tubal infertile women without hydrosalpinx who underwent IVF/ICSI between January 2014 and August 2019 in our center. Hydrosalpinx patients received different treatments including laparoscopic surgery (only salpingectomy and proximal tubal occlusion/ligation were included), ultrasonic-guided aspiration and hysteroscopic tubal occlusion. Outcomes were analyzed by One-way ANOVA, Chi-Square test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

The live birth rate (LBR) of laparoscopic surgery was significantly higher compared with hydrosalpinx aspiration (48.3% vs 39.6%, p = .024). The cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) of subsequent laparoscopic surgery was significantly higher compared with subsequent hysteroscopic occlusion (65.1% vs 34.1%, p = .001) and no subsequent treatment (65.1% vs 44.9%, p  <  .005). Subsequent laparoscopic surgery significantly improved the CLBR of hydrosalpinx patients who received ultrasonic-guided aspiration and didn't get clinical pregnancy in fresh cycles (Odds Ratio (OR) =1.875; 95%CI = 1.041-3.378, p = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery leads to significantly higher LBR than ultrasonic-guided aspiration and significantly higher CLBR than hysteroscopic occlusion and no treatment.

Live birth rates after resolution of endometrial cavity fluid in frozen embryo transfer cycles

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are live birth rates affected in frozen embryo transfer cycles that develop transient endometrial cavity fluid that resolves by day of embryo transfer?

DESIGN

The first frozen blastocyst transfer cycle between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study at an academic fertility center. The presence or absence of endometrial cavity fluid (ECF) detected on initial ultrasound and at time of transfer was recorded. Patients who had persistent ECF at time of transfer were excluded from the study. The primary outcome was live birth rate in the group with resolved ECF relative to the group without ECF.

RESULTS

A total of 1034 frozen blastocyst transfer cycles were included, 54 with resolved ECF and 980 without ECF. Adjusted analyses were performed using a log-binomial regression model. Live birth rates were 35.2% and 34.2%, adjusted risk ratio 1.00 [95% CI 0.70-1.50] in the two groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Live birth rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles are equivalent between patients with resolved endometrial cavity fluid compared to those who never had endometrial cavity fluid. Our findings suggest that the presence of endometrial cavity fluid is likely not detrimental to live birth rates if the fluid spontaneously resolves by the time of embryo transfer.

Aspiration with Diosmin Intake in Endometrial Cavity Fluid Accumulation in ART Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

This was a prospective randomized controlled trial in 200 cases presented with endometrial cavity fluid at the day of oocyte retrieval at a private fertility center from 2013 to 2021. The cases were randomized at day of ovum pickup into 2 groups: Group 1 (control group) (n = 100): conventional management with follow-up and reassessment by transvaginal ultrasound on day 5. Group 2 (interventional group) (n = 100): aspiration of the fluid was done and cases were given diosmin 500 mg 3 times per day till reassessment at embryo transfer day. In both groups, we proceeded with fresh embryo transfer if no fluid is present on day 5 or freeze-all policy if persistent fluid was detected.

Results

Endometrial fluid on the 5th day was significantly higher in the control group (28.0%) than in the interventional group (6.0%) (P < 0.001). Regarding pregnancy rate, although being higher in the interventional group (54.3% vs 50.0%), the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.5). It was found that the intervention was associated with risk reduction of endometrial fluid (OR = 0.168, 95% CI = 0.065-0.429, P < 0.001.

Conclusion

Aspiration of endometrial cavity fluid with diosmin intake increased the likelihood of fresh embryo transfer and with a slightly better pregnancy rate compared to conservative management.Clinical trial number: NCT02158000, Date of registration: 6/6/2014, Date of initial enrollment (first patient recruiting): 1/11/2014, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02158000.

Which patients with hydrosalpinx will benefit more from reproductive surgery to improve natural pregnancy outcomes?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The most common tubal disease leading to infertility occurs in the distal region, manifesting as hydrosalpinx. Tubal surgery is an effective alternative treatment. However, subpopulations that benefit the most from tubal repair surgery remain unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the natural pregnancy outcomes of patients with hydrosalpinx after reproductive surgery and those with different grades of hydrosalpinx.

METHODS

We searched the major online databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials) to collect observational studies on patients with hydrosalpinx who underwent surgeries to preserve natural fertility from January 2000 to August 2022. The outcome indicators were natural intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and ectopic pregnancy (EP) rates. Studies on patients with hydrosalpinx who underwent laparoscopic surgeries and those who intended to be conceived naturally were included. Studies on patients with non-hydrosalpinx diseases, those who underwent open surgery, and those who intended to undergo assisted conception were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies was used for quality evaluation. Meta-analysis of a single rate was performed using RevMan5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles were included in this study, including 1317 patients with hydrosalpinx. Seven studies were retrospective and 3 were prospective. It was found that after surgery for preserving natural fertility function, the IUP and EP rates of patients with hydrosalpinx were 27% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22-32%) and 4.8% (95% CI: 2.91-8.26%), respectively. In addition, the IUP and EP rates in patients with mild (n = 254), moderate (n = 252), and severe (n = 473) hydrosalpinx were 50.5% (95% CI: 38.65-61.97%), 32.9% (95% CI: 21.88-46.24%), 10.7% (95% CI: 4.76-21.88%), and 7.4% (95% CI: 2.91-19.35%), 9.09% (95% CI: 6.54-13.79%), 8.3%, 8.26% (95% CI: 3.85-18.03%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with mild to moderate hydrosalpinx will benefit more from reproductive surgery to improve natural pregnancy outcomes. However, the small sample size in our study needs to be further expanded, and the grouping needs to be more refined, such as grouping based on age. This may provide more guidance in clinical practice.

Is There Still a Place for Reconstructive Surgery in Distal Tubal Disease?

Tubal diseases account for 25–40% of female factor infertility. Mainly, they involve the distal part of the fallopian tube, and hydrosalpinx is the most severe manifestation. Usually, the management decision is made between reconstructive surgery and ART, depending on the severity of the tubal damage, patient age, ovarian reserve, and seminogram, as well as financial, religious, ethical, and psychological factors. Estimated live-birth rates after corrective surgery range from 9% to 69%. The success rate of IVF is about 30% live-birth rate per cycle initiated in women across all ages with tubal factor infertility. Surgery offers a long-term cure and patients may attempt conception many times but are burdened with perioperative adverse events. IVF bypasses potential complications of operative treatment; however, this has its own unique risks. The effectiveness of reconstructive surgery versus ART has not been adequately evaluated. The success of fertility management depends on a thorough interpretation of existing data and careful patient selection. The presented review provides updates on the most recent progress in this area.

Intra-cavitary fluid resulted from caesarean section but not isthmocele compromised clinical pregnancy after IVF/ICSI treatment

The aim of this study was to explore whether the presence of intra-cavitary fluid (ICF) influences the pregnancy outcomes of patients with caesarean section (CS) in embryo transfer cycles. A total of 8494 transferred cycles of 4924 women were enrolled in this retrospective study and separated into three subgroups by previous delivery method and the presence of intra-cavity fluid, a caesarean group with ICF (CS-ICF, n = 649), a caesarean group without ICF (CS-noICF, n = 3207), and the remaining 4638 cycles without ICF were included in the vaginal delivered group (VD, n = 4638). Baseline characteristics and clinical outcome were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust confounding factors between groups. Patients in the CS-ICF group were of younger age (36.49 ± 4.19 vs 37.34 ± 4.25, 37.32 ± 4.86, P < 0.001), had better ovary reserve, and had more blastocyst transferred compared with the CS-noICF and VD groups. However, cycles in the CS-ICF group achieved unsatisfactory clinical pregnancy outcomes. PSM analysis for comparability and differences in clinical outcomes still existed. The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the CS-ICF group than in the CS-noICF group (35.1% vs 41.7% for CS-noICF group, 48.1% for VD group, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of fresh embryo transferred cycles, the differences in clinical outcomes disappeared after PSM analysis, while the clinical pregnancy rate was still lowest among the three matched groups of FET cycles (36.4% vs 50.3% for VD group, P < 0.001). The presence of intra-cavitary fluid (ICF), but not necessarily the isthmocele, significantly compromises the clinical pregnancy rate in patients with previous CS undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment.

Risk factors for the development of endometrial fluid in women undergoing IVF: A retrospective cohort study✰

RESEARCH QUESTION

Presence of endometrial fluid (EF) is a poorly understood pathology and remains a challenge for clinicians, as very little data exists to explain its consequences and treatment. Our objective was to investigate risk factors for EF during IVF.

DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included all women with a freeze all embryos cycle (FAE) for EF between 2010 and 2016 at a university-affiliated private IVF center. Controls (2:1) were randomly selected out of the database of our fresh autologous IVF cycles during the same period. Main outcome measures were possible risk factors for EF, comprising polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), previous pelvic or endometrial surgery (polypectomy or synechia removal), cesarean section, myomas and severe endometriosis. A logistic regression model was used to assess independent risk factors for EF.

RESULTS

Out of 9000 IVF cycles, 1204 were FAE cycles, among which we identified 86 EF cases. We then selected 171 controls. Independent risk factors for presence of EF were a history of previous myomectomy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 19.77, 95%CI [4.01-97.53]), severe endometriosis (aOR 5.97, 95%CI [2.09-17.05]), PCOS (aOR 5.72, 95%CI [2.66-12.33]) and previous cesarean section (aOR 5.17, 95%CI [1.84-14.49]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are not only confirming the association between PCOS, severe endometriosis, previous cesarean procedure and EF, but also reporting for the first time an association between previous myomectomy and EF.

Practical Clinical and Diagnostic Pathway for the Investigation of the Infertile Couple

Capsule

This expert opinion summarizes current knowledge on risk factors for infertility and identifies a practical clinical and diagnostic approach for the male and female partners of an infertile couple aimed to improve the investigation and management of fertility problems.

Background

Infertility represents an important and growing health problem affecting up to 16% of couples worldwide. In most cases, male, female, or combined factor can be identified, and different causes or risk factors have been related to this condition. However, there are no standardized guidelines on the clinical-diagnostic approach of infertile couples and the recommendations concerning infertility are sometimes lacking, incomplete, or problematic to apply.

Objective

The aim of this work is to provide an appropriate clinical and diagnostic pathway for infertile couples designed by a multidisciplinary-team of experts. The rationale is based on the history and physical examination and then oriented on the basis of initial investigations. This approach could be applied in order to reduce variation in practice and to improve the investigation and management of fertility problems.

Methods

Prominent Italian experts of the main specialties committed in the ART procedures, including gynecologists, andrologists, embryologists, biologists, geneticists, oncologists, and microbiologists, called "InfertilItaly group", used available evidence to develop this expert position.

Outcomes

Starting from the individuation of the principal risk factors that may influence the fertility of females and males and both genders, the work group identified most appropriate procedures using a gradual approach to both partners aimed to obtain a precise diagnosis and the most effective therapeutic option, reducing invasive and occasionally redundant procedures.

Conclusions

This expert position provides current knowledge on risk factors and suggests a diagnostic workflow of infertile couples. By using this step-by-step approach, health care workers involved in ART, may individuate a practical clinical management of infertile couples shared by experts.

A retrospective analysis of ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy for hydrosalpinges

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We compared the effects of unilateral and bilateral salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx on ovarian function, oocyte retrieval, and embryogenesis.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the hospital records of 109 women with unilateral hydrosalpinx and 57 women with bilateral hydrosalpinges who had undergone in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment (280 oocyte retrieval cycles) between January 2011 and December 2018. We compared age at oocyte retrieval, level of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measured within 1 year of oocyte retrieval, duration of infertility, number of previous IVF treatments, level of follicle stimulating hormone, total gonadotropin dose, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, blastocyst formation rate, and peak serum estrogen concentration. This study was approved by the institutional review board.

RESULTS

Of the women with unilateral hydrosalpinx, no significant differences were observed in ovarian response, rate of fertilization or rate of blastocyst production between the 21 women (24 cycles) who had undergone unilateral salpingectomy and the 88 women (146 cycles) who had not. Of the women with bilateral hydrosalpinges, the 13 (24 cycles) who had undergone bilateral salpingectomy had slightly lower AMH levels and significantly fewer oocytes retrieved (5.5 ± 3.9 vs 8.3 ± 5.5; P = .0068) than the 44 women (86 cycles) who had not had a salpingectomy. Women who had undergone bilateral salpingectomy also had significantly lower peak serum estrogen concentrations than those who had not undergone salpingectomy (1876.1 ± 765.9 vs 2489.5 ± 1551.4; P = .009).

CONCLUSION

In women with hydrosalpinx, bilateral salpingectomy may reduce ovarian function and response to gonadotropins, especially the number of oocytes retrieved. Unilateral salpingectomy does not have these effects.

Management of Hydrosalpinx in the Era of Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effect of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy outcomes, to compare different types of management of hydrosalpinx and their impact on pregnancy rates as well as on the ovarian reserve.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic search using Pubmed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and including all published studies that examined tubal infertility and its management (assisted reproductive technology or surgery) as well as the effects on ovarian reserve. The following medical subject headings (Mesh) terms combinations were used: "fallopian tube disease," hydrosalpinx," "tubal or salpinx occlusion or obstruction," "in vitro fertilization," "fallopian tube surgery," "salpingectomy," "salpingostomy," "infertility," "subfertility," "sterility" and "ovarian reserve."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

All randomized trials, cohort, and case controls studies were included. We excluded review articles, meeting abstracts, case series and case reports, and abstracts without access to full texts. The search was limited to trials in humans and published in English.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Our electronic search initially retrieved 6354 articles. Finally, 19 studies were included in the quantitative evaluation of the effects of hydrosalpinx: 23 in the qualitative evaluation and 5 in the quantitative evaluation of different types of hydrosalpinx treatments; and 17 in the quantitative evaluation of ovarian reserve. The presence of a hydrosalpinx was associated with decreased rates of implantation and clinical pregnancy, and increased rates of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. Management of hydrosalpinx with salpingectomy, tubal occlusion, or hydrosalpinx aspiration led to better in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates. We found no difference in ovarian response to stimulation after salpingectomy except a decrease in antimüllerian hormone compared to no surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of hydrosalpinx is associated with decreased pregnancy rate and increased rates of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. Management of hydrosalpinx, regardless of the type of treatment, leads to an increased chance of pregnancy.

Effect comparison of salpingectomy versus proximal tubal occlusion on ovarian reserve: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The women with hydrosalpinx have lower pregnancy rates in assisted reproductive technology, and only laparoscopic salpingectomy and tubal occlusion has proven to be effective to improve the outcome of in vitro fertilization. The main objective of the present meta-analysis was to assess and compare the ovarian reserve after salpingectomy or proximal tubal occlusion (PTO) in the published literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We considered all published cohort (retrospective and prospective) and cross-sectional studies as well as randomized controlled trials that investigated changes in serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone levels or antral follicle count (AFC) following salpingectomy or PTO. Two investigators (SW, QZ) independently screened the full text of all identified articles to assess relevance to our meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 648 patients were included in 5 studies. In the analysis of comparative studies. In the analysis of comparative studies, the follicle-stimulating hormone of salpingectomy had no significant difference with that of PTO (WMD 0.46IU/L, 95% CI[-0.14,1.05]). The AMH and AFC of salpingectomy were significantly higher than that of PTO (AFC: WMD -0.80IU/L, 95% CI [-1.46, -0.14]; AMH: WMD -1.01IU/L, 95% CI [-1.28, -0.74]).

CONCLUSIONS

Salpingectomy did more harm to ovarian reserve than PTO in the short-term. However, the long-term effects on ovarian reserve remains uncertain.

Extended doxycycline treatment versus salpingectomy in the management of patients with hydrosalpinx undergoing IVF-ET

Background

The aim of this study was to determine whether the treatment with doxycycline before and after oocyte retrieval is as effective as salpingectomy in minimizing the detrimental effect of hydrosalpinx on the outcomes of IVF-ET.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was done for the outcomes of the IVF-ET cycles of patients with hydrosalpinx who underwent laparoscopic salpingectomy prior to IVF cycle (n = 260) or were treated with extended doxycycline treatment during the IVF cycle (n = 45). In doxycycline group, doxycycline (100 mg twice daily) was started 1 week before anticipated oocyte retrieval and was continued for 1 week after oocyte retrieval. In salpingectomy group, the mesosalpinx was coagulated as close as possible to the fallopian tube.

Results

The implantation, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in the salpingectomy group (20.87% Vs. 9.91%, P value =0.007, 44.62% Vs. 20%, P value = 0.002, 39.62% Vs. 17.78%, P value = 0.005 and 37.31% Vs. 15.56%, P value = 0.005 respectively).

Conclusion

Salpingectomy is more effective than extended doxycycline treatment in improving the outcomes of IVF-ET in patients with hydrosalpinx undergoing IVF-ET. Further, larger well designed randomized controlled trials should be conducted to confirm the findings of this study.

The human tubal lavage proteome reveals biological processes that may govern the pathology of hydrosalpinx

Hydrosalpinx, the blockage of fallopian tubes, can result from pelvic inflammatory disease. Hydrosalpinx is a cause of infertility and negatively impacts in vitro fertilization. To better understand the pathobiology of hydrosalpinx, we compared the proteome of lavages from disease vs. healthy fallopian tubes. Results indicate a disruption of redox homeostasis and activation of the complement system, immune cell infiltration, and phagocytosis; pathways that may drive tubal injury. To our surprise among the most prominent proteins with hydrosalpinx was mesothelin (MSLN), which until now has only been associated with epithelial malignancies. Analogous to mesothelioma and ovarian carcinoma, a significant increase of MSLN was detected in plasma from patients with hydrosalpinx. This finding suggests MSLN may provide clinical diagnosis in lieu of the current approaches that require invasive imaging. Importantly, these findings implicate MSLN in a benign disease, indicating that the activation and role of MSLN is not restricted to cancer.

Hydrosalpinx - Salpingostomy, salpingectomy or tubal occlusion

Tubal factors account for approximately 25% of cases of infertility, and the most severe manifestation of tubal disease is hydrosalpinx, accounting for 10-30% of tubal diseases. Hydrosalpinx is a distension or dilatation of the fallopian tube in the presence of a distal tubal occlusion, and the most common cause is pelvic inflammatory disease. Women with hydrosalpinges have lower implantation and pregnancy rates in assisted reproductive technology (ART), due to a combination of mechanical and chemical factors thought to disrupt the endometrial environment. Current guidance is removal of the tube by salpingectomy (preferably laparoscopically) before IVF treatment. Salpingostomy, or distal tubal plastic surgery in the management of hydrosalpinx, is an alternative for women desiring natural conception, although ectopic pregnancy rates as high as 10% have been reported. Proximal tubal occlusion with Essure^® devices placed hysteroscopically can be considered particularly in cases of distorted pelvic anatomy or pelvic adhesions making abdominal surgery complex. However, low clinical pregnancy and live birth rates have been reported with the use of these devices before IVF. In this review, we discuss salpingostomy, salpingectomy and tubal occlusion as possible management options for the reproductive women with hydrosalpinx.

Ovarian Reserve and Assisted Reproductive Technique Outcomes After Laparoscopic Proximal Tubal Occlusion or Salpingectomy in Women with Hydrosalpinx Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) after proximal tubal occlusion (PTO) or salpingectomy in patients with hydrosalpinx undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).

SETTING

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

PATIENTS

A total of 165 patients were randomized and subsequently allocated to a PTO group (n = 83) or a salpingectomy group (n = 82).

INTERVENTIONS

PTO and salpingectomy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Following surgery, compared with the PTO group, the salpingectomy group showed significant decreases in the ovarian reserve parameters serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH; 3.7 ng/mL vs 2.6 ng/mL; p ˂ .001) and antral follicle count (AFC; 10.6 vs 8.6; p ˂ .001). The salpingectomy group also required a significantly higher dose of gonadotropins (3901 vs 3260; p ˂ .001) and more days of stimulation (11.3 vs 10.2; p ˂ .001) compared with the PTO group. The salpingectomy group had a significantly lower fertilization rate (0.74 vs 0.83; p ˂ .001) and a lower number of grade 1 embryos (4.1 vs 5.6; p = .02); however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to rates of implantation (22.8% vs 23.7%; p = .87), clinical pregnancy (26.3% vs 33.7%, p = .25), live birth (27.5% vs 32.5%; p = .42), and miscarriage (4.7% vs 3.5%; p = .90) CONCLUSIONS: PTO is a superior to salpingectomy for the surgical management of patients with hydrosalpinx undergoing IVF-ET in terms of ovarian reserve. However, the 2 surgical techniques are associated with comparable pregnancy rates.

Impact of endometrial cavity fluid on assisted reproductive technology outcomes

BACKGROUND

The impact of endometrial cavity fluid (ECF) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes has not been evaluated in a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of ECF on the outcome of ART cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed, China Academic Journals Full-text Database, and China Doctoral/Masters Dissertations Full-text Databases were searched for reports published in any language before January 1, 2015, using relevant keywords.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they compared the outcome of ART in women with and without ECF.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Background information, participants' characteristics, and study outcomes were recorded. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies evaluating 5928 ART cycles were included. The pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the group with ECF than in the group without ECF (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.98; P=0.03). The same association was observed if the analysis included only patients with hydrosalpinx (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.86; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical pregnancy rate after ART is significantly lower among patients with ECF than among those without ECF. In addition, if ECF is found in patients with hydrosalpinx, ART cycles should be cancelled after oocyte retrieval.

Essure(®) for management of hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilisation-a systematic review and pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

Hydrosalpinges in infertile women reduce the success of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) by 50%. Surgical management of hydrosalpinges before IVF improves outcome but these procedures are often contraindicated in women with dense pelvic adhesions. Tubal occlusion achieved by Essure(®) via hysteroscopy provides an alternative.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review on the efficacy and safety of Essure(®) in the management of hydrosalpinx before IVF.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (January 1950 to July 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to July 2013) and Web of Science (1899 to July 2013). We also searched reference lists of relevant articles and proceedings of relevant international conferences (2000-2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All types of studies where women with suspected infertility and presence of hydrosalpinx had hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with Essure(®) before IVF.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies and extracted data. Where necessary, study authors were contacted for further data.

MAIN RESULTS

In all, 115 women in 11 studies received Essure(®) , mainly in the outpatient setting where local anaesthesia by paracervical block and/or intravenous sedation was used. Successful placement of Essure(®) was achieved in 96.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 91.1-98.9%) of women and tubal occlusion in 98.1% (95% CI 93.1-99.9%). Subsequent IVF resulted in 38.6% pregnancy rate (95% CI 30.9-46.8%), 27.9% live birth rate (95% CI 21.1-35.8%) and 28.6% combined ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate (95% CI 21.7-36.6%) per embryo transfer.

AUTHOR'S CONCLUSIONS

Essure(®) appears to be an effective option for management of hydrosalpinx in women before IVF although evidence from a randomised controlled clinical trial is lacking.

State-mandated insurance coverage is associated with the approach to hydrosalpinges before IVF

The aim of this study was to determine whether practice in states with infertility insurance mandates is associated with physician-reported practice patterns regarding hydrosalpinx management in assisted reproduction clinics. A cross-sectional, internet-based survey of 442 members of Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility or Society of Reproductive Surgeons was performed. Physicians practising in states without infertility insurance mandates were more likely to report performing diagnostic surgery after an inconclusive hysterosalpingogram than physicians practising in states with mandates (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3, P < 0.01). Additionally, respondents in states without mandates were more likely to report that, due to lack of infertility insurance coverage, they did not perform salpingectomy (SPX) or proximal tubal occlusion (PTO) before assisted reproduction treatment (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8, P = 0.01). Finally, respondents in states without mandates were less likely to report that the presence of assisted reproduction treatment coverage determined the urgency with which they pursued SPX or PTO before treatment (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.0, NS). These results persisted after controlling for physician years in practice, age and clinic volume. In conclusion, self-reported physician practice interventions for hydrosalpinges before assisted reproduction treatment may be associated with state-mandated infertility insurance. Fallopian tube dysfunction is a known cause of infertility and severe dysfunction is manifested by dilation and occlusion, known as hydrosalpinx. Outcomes with assisted reproductive techniques (ART) are lower when hydrosalpinges are present and while there are several theories for this, reproductive specialist recommend "neutralizing" the tube either by occlusion or removal in order to enhance pregnancy rates. In the United States, coverage for infertility services is not uniform with only 15 states having some legislation requiring infertility benefits. Some states where ART is covered liberally, physicians might have different practice patterns related to the neutralization of hydrosalpinges compared to those who are in non -mandated states. We utilized a survey of over 400 providers in the United States to examine their practice patterns as it relates to hydrosalpinges based on which state they practice in and whether or not that state has mandated coverage of not.

Tubal factor infertility and perinatal risk after assisted reproductive technology

OBJECTIVE

To assess trends of tubal factor infertility and to evaluate risk of miscarriage and delivery of preterm or low birth weight (LBW) neonates among women with tubal factor infertility using assisted reproductive technology (ART).

METHODS

We assessed trends of tubal factor infertility among all fresh and frozen, donor, and nondonor ART cycles performed annually in the United States between 2000 and 2010 (N=1,418,774) using the National ART Surveillance System. The data set was then limited to fresh, nondonor in vitro fertilization cycles resulting in pregnancy to compare perinatal outcomes for cycles associated with tubal compared with male factor infertility. We performed bivariate and multivariable analyses controlling for maternal characteristics and calculated adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

The percentage of ART cycles associated with tubal factor infertility diagnoses decreased from 2000 to 2010 (26.02-14.81%). Compared with male factor infertility, tubal factor portended an increased risk of miscarriage (14.0% compared with 12.7%, adjusted RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12); risk was increased for both early and late miscarriage. Singleton neonates born to women with tubal factor infertility had an increased risk of preterm birth (15.8% compared with 11.6%, adjusted RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.20-1.34) and LBW (10.9% compared with 8.5%, adjusted RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.20-1.36). Significant increases in risk persisted for early and late preterm delivery and very low and moderately LBW delivery. A significantly elevated risk was also detected for twin, but not triplet, pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

Tubal factor infertility, which is decreasing in prevalence in the United States, is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage, preterm birth, and LBW delivery as compared with couples with male factor infertility using ART.

How members of the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility and Society of Reproductive Surgeons evaluate, define, and manage hydrosalpinges

OBJECTIVE

To describe the management of hydrosalpinges among Society for Reproduction Endocrinology and Infertility (SREI)/Society of Reproductive Surgeons (SRS) members.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of SREI/SRS members.

SETTING

Academic and private practice-based reproductive medicine physicians.

PARTICIPANT(S)

A total of 442 SREI and/or SRS members.

INTERVENTION(S)

Internet-based survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

To understand how respondents evaluate, define, and manage hydrosalpinges.

RESULT(S)

Of 1,070 SREI and SRS members surveyed, 442 responded to all items, for a 41% response rate. Respondents represented both academic and private practice settings, and differences existed in the evaluation and management of hydrosalpinges. More than one-half (57%) perform their own hysterosalpingograms (HSGs), and 54.5% involve radiologists in their interpretation of tubal disease. Most respondents thought that a clinically significant hydrosalpinx on HSG is one that is distally occluded (80.4%) or visible on ultrasound (60%). Approximately one in four respondents remove a unilateral hydrosalpinx before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)/intrauterine insemination (IUI) and clomiphene citrate (CC)/IUI (29.3% and 22.8%, respectively), and physicians in private practice were more likely to intervene (COH: risk ratio [RR] 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.51; CC: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.33-2.95). Although laparoscopic salpingectomy was the preferred method of surgical management, nearly one-half responded that hysteroscopic tubal occlusion should have a role as a primary method of intervention.

CONCLUSION(S)

SREI/SRS members define a "clinically significant hydrosalpinx" consistently, and actual practice among members reflects American Society for Reproductive Medicine/SRS recommendations, with variation attributed to individual patient needs. Additionally, one in four members intervene before other infertility treatments when there is a unilateral hydrosalpinx present.

The current place of tubal surgery in the management of subfertility

Treatment of tubal disease can be challenging and complex. It requires accurate assessment of the extent of disease and evaluation of all fertility parameters. Although traditionally treatment involved salpingectomy or IVF or a combination of the two, less invasive treatment options may prove beneficial. We evaluated the various diagnostic tools for disease assessment and the treatment options available.

Endometrial appearance in the presence of communicating hydrosalpinx

We report the hysteroscopic findings in a 22 year old nulligravid patient with bilateral communicating hydrosalpinges. The inflamed hyperemic endometrial cavity encountered preoperatively normalized at second look hysteroscopy six months after bilateral tubal interruption. The patient underwent successful IVF with culmination in a singleton, live birth. We propose that an inflamed appearance at hysteroscopy, done for endometrial cavity screening, should prompt a dedicated study to rule out hydrosalpinx prior to proceeding with IVF treatment. To date, such a hysteroscopic endometrial phenotype in the presence of hydrosalpinx has not been well characterized.

The progressive simplification of the infertility evaluation

OBJECTIVE

With the advent of evidence-based medicine, much of the complex testing that infertile couples used to undergo is no longer recommended as part of the routine evaluation. Examples of tests no longer implemented include the postcoital test, Rubin test of tubal patency, endometrial biopsy, sperm antibody testing, and the zona-free hamster test. The role of routine diagnostic laparoscopy and hysteroscopy is also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2010, the simplicity of the current evaluation of couples presenting with infertility is essential information for patients to know at the initial visit. Ideally, it can help alleviate anxiety and provide patients with a road-map during a visit that is often associated with stress and high emotions.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this educational activity, the obstetrician/gynecologist should be better able to assess the current recommendations for evaluating infertile couples; examine the various ways to assess ovarian reserve, the uterine cavity, and fallopian patency; and appraise the controversy surrounding diagnostic surgery.

Effect of ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid during oocyte retrieval on the outcomes of in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: a randomised controlled trial (NCT01040351)

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid at the time of oocyte retrieval can improve the outcomes of in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

PATIENTS

One hundred and ten women with ultrasound-visible hydrosalpinges were randomised to two groups based on computer generated randomisation list. Fifty-four women underwent ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid prior to IVF-ET and 53 women underwent IVF-ET without any prior intervention.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent aspiration of hydrosalpinges demonstrated a significantly increased implantation, clinical pregnancy rates. Among the patients in the aspiration group, the implantation rate and pregnancy rates were higher in the subgroup of patients with no reaccumulation of hydrosalpingeal fluid within the first 2 weeks after aspiration compared to patients with reaccumulation of hydrosalpingeal fluid within the first 2 weeks after aspiration, but this difference failed to reach statistical significance. Furthermore, no pregnancies occurred in the four patients with uterine fluid collection detected during IVF-ET cycles.

CONCLUSION

The aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid at the time of oocyte retrieval is simple, safe and effective procedure for treatment of patients with ultrasound-visible hydrosalpinges particularly those without rapid reaccumulation of hydrosalpingeal fluid after aspiration or uterine fluid collection during the IVF-ET cycles.

Implantation failure: molecular mechanisms and clinical treatment

BACKGROUND

Implantation is a complex initial step in the establishment of a successful pregnancy. Although embryo quality is an important determinant of implantation, temporally coordinated differentiation of endometrial cells to attain uterine receptivity and a synchronized dialog between maternal and embryonic tissues are crucial. The exact mechanism of implantation failure is still poorly understood.

METHODS

This review summarizes the current knowledge about the proposed mechanisms of implantation failure in gynecological diseases, the evaluation of endometrial receptivity and the treatment methods to improve implantation.

RESULTS

The absence or suppression of molecules essential for endometrial receptivity results in decreased implantation rates in animal models and gynecological diseases, including endometriosis, hydrosalpinx, leiomyoma and polycystic ovarian syndrome. The mechanisms are diverse and include abnormal cytokine and hormonal signaling as well as epigenetic alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimizing endometrial receptivity in fertility treatment will improve success rates. Evaluation of implantation markers may help to predict pregnancy outcome and detect occult implantation deficiency. Treating the underlying gynecological disease with medical or surgical interventions is the optimal current therapy. Manipulating the expression of key endometrial genes with gene or stem cell-based therapies may some day be used to further improve implantation rates.

Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation

BACKGROUND

Tubal disease, and particularly hydrosalpinx, has a detrimental effect on the outcome of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Performing a surgical intervention such as salpingectomy, tubal occlusion, aspiration of the hydrosalpinx fluid, or salpingostomy, prior to the IVF procedure in women with hydrosalpinges is thought improve the likelihood of successful outcome.

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the value of surgical treatments for tubal disease prior to IVF.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were sought in the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PSYCHMED and in Conference proceedings and reference lists up until Ocober 28 2009. Researchers in the field were contacted to reveal unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All trials comparing a surgical treatment for tubal disease with a control group generated by randomisation were considered for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The studied outcomes were live birth, ongoing pregnancy, viable-, clinical- and biochemical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ovarian function and complications.

MAIN RESULTS

Five randomised controlled trials involving 646 women were included in this review. Four studies assessed salpingectomy versus no treatment, two of which also included a tubal occlusion arm, and one trial assessed aspiration versus no treatment. No trials reported on the primary outcome: live birth. The odds of ongoing pregnancy (Peto OR 2.14, 95%CI 1.23 to 3.73) and of clinical pregnancy (Peto OR 2.31, 95%CI 1.48 to 3.62) however were increased with laparoscopic salpingectomy for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF. Laparoscopic occlusion of the fallopian tube versus no intervention did not increase the odds of ongoing pregnancy significantly (Peto OR 7.24, 95%CI 0.87 to 59.57) but the odds of clinical pregnancy (Peto OR 4.66, 95%CI 2.47 to 10.01) had sufficient power to show a significant increase. Comparison of tubal occlusion to salpingectomy did not show a significant advantage of either surgical procedure in terms of ongoing pregnancy (Peto OR: 1.65, 95%CI 0.74, 3.71) or clinical pregnancy (Peto OR 1.28, 95%CI 0,76 to 2.14). One RCT reported efficacy of ultrasound guided aspiration, however the odds of pregnancy did not show a significant increase in the odds of clinical pregnancy (Peto OR 1.97, 95%CI 0.62 to 6.29), and confidence intervals were wide. Throughout the different comparisons no significant differences were seen in adverse effects of surgical treatments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment should be considered for all women with hydrosalpinges prior to IVF treatment. Previous evidence supported only unilateral salpingectomy for a unilateral hydrosalpinx (bilateral salpingectomy for bilateral hydrosalpinges). This review now provides evidence that laparoscopic tubal occlusion is an alternative to laparoscopic salpingectomy in improving IVF pregnancy rates in women with hydrosalpinges. Further research is required to assess the value of aspiration of hydrosalpinges prior to or during IVF procedures and also the value of tubal restorative surgery as an alternative (or as a preliminary) to IVF.

The value of salpingoscopy in tubal infertility

Tubal factors are estimated to account for 15–20 per cent of infertility. The incidence not only depends on the patient population but is probably also underestimated since evaluation of tubai function is largely restricted to the appraisal of its patency. Consequently the treatment of tubai infertility is primarily focused on the restoration of tubai patency. That infertility frequently persists in spite of successfully restored patency and that tubal pregnancy frequently occurs after infertility surgery suggest that underlying disease has not been diagnosed.

Laparoscopic proximal tubal division can preserve ovarian reserve for infertility patients with hydrosalpinges

AIM

To investigate whether laparoscopic proximal tubal division for the treatment of hydrosalpinges could preserve ovarian function.

METHODS

From June 2002 to October 2006, before assisted reproductive treatment (ART), a total of 17 infertile patients with bilateral hydrosalpinges were studied--11 patients underwent laparoscopic proximal tubal division (PTD group), and six underwent laparoscopic salpingectomy (salpingectomy group). In both groups, the basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) values before and after surgery, the operation time and outcome of ART treatment were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean FSH value before laparoscopic PTD was similar to that after surgery. The FSH value before laparoscopic salpingectomy significantly increased after surgery (6.8 +/- 1.1 vs 14.1 +/- 9.3). The operation time in the PTD group was significantly shorter than in the salpingectomy group. The outcomes of ART were similar in both groups. The pregnancy rate per patient in the PTD and salpingectomy groups were 45.5% and 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic proximal tubal division preserved ovarian function and was an optimal operation method for infertility patients with hydrosalpinges. The basal FSH values after laparoscopic proximal tubal division were comparable to those before surgery.

High prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women with normal ovulation and normospermic partners

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of histologically proven endometriosis in a subset of infertile women.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series with electronic file search and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

SETTING

Tertiary academic fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

Two hundred twenty-one infertile women without previous surgical diagnosis for infertility with regular cycles (variation, 21-35 days) whose partners have a normal semen analysis.

INTERVENTION(S)

Diagnostic laparoscopy and, if necessary, operative laparoscopy with CO(2) laser excision.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT(S)

The prevalence of endometriosis and of fertility-reducing nonendometriotic tubal and/or uterine pathology.

RESULT(S)

The prevalence of endometriosis was 47% (104/221), including stage I (39%, 41/104), stage II (24%, 25/104), stage III (14%, 15/104), and stage IV (23%, 23/104) endometriosis, and was comparable in patients with (54%, 61/113) and without (40%, 43/108) pelvic pain. The prevalence of fertility-reducing nonendometriotic tubal and/or uterine pathology was 29% in all patients (15% in women with and 40% in women without endometriosis). A multivariate logistic regression model including pain, ultrasound data, age, duration of infertility, and type of fertility was not or not sufficiently reliable for the prediction of endometriosis according to the revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) classifications I-II and rAFS III-IV, respectively.

CONCLUSION(S)

Reproductive surgery is indicated in infertile women belonging to the study population, regardless of pain symptoms or transvaginal ultrasound results, since half of them have endometriosis and 40% of those without endometriosis have fertility-reducing pelvic pathology.

Essure treatment of hydrosalpinges

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of Essure microinsert placement in patients with hydrosalpinges before IVF.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-series.

SETTING

An advanced endoscopic practice within a university-affiliated teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Five women with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinges on transvaginal ultrasound, laparoscopy, or hysterosalpingogram who were planning further fertility therapy. In all patients, laparoscopy was felt to be relatively contraindicated because of previous extensive abdominopelvic surgery.

INTERVENTION(S)

Hysteroscopic placement of the Essure microinsert in four patients under general anesthesia. One patient underwent fluoroscopically guided placement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Placement rates and postoperative recovery, technical challenges in Essure placement, and results of subsequent treatment with IVF when available.

RESULT(S)

Successful bilateral Essure placement was confirmed in two of five patients. Unilateral placement was achieved in two of five. There were no postoperative complications. No pregnancies have occurred thus far.

CONCLUSION(S)

Hysteroscopic placement of the Essure microinsert is a minimally invasive option for proximal tubal occlusion. In patients requiring occlusion of hydrosalpinges before IVF and with contraindications to abdominal surgery, this technique may offer a safer alternative. Preoperative documentation of proximal tubal patency helps predict placement success. Further research into this unique clinical scenario is required.

Treatment of hydrosalpinx in the patient undergoing assisted reproduction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with hydrosalpinx are a recognized group with poor prognosis in in-vitro fertilization. This review presents evidence for the effectiveness of different treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Theories explaining the mechanisms behind the impaired outcome of in-vitro fertilization still focus on the hydrosalpingeal fluid. Gamete and embryotoxic effects have been demonstrated, but it is not a consistent finding. Endometrial receptivity may be altered by the reduced expression of cytokines and integrins important to implantation, and reduced endometrial and subendometrial blood flows may play a role. The rationale for treatments to improve the results of in-vitro fertilization is based on interruption of the leakage of hydrosalpinx fluid into the uterine cavity. Laparoscopic salpingectomy has been evaluated in a large randomized trial and proved effective in restoring birth rates. Proximal tubal ligation may also be effective according to one smaller randomized trial. Other suggested methods such as transvaginal drainage have been poorly investigated.

SUMMARY

Pre-in-vitro fertilization salpingectomy is the only method that has proved effective in restoring birth rates in patients with hydrosalpinx. The underlying mechanism explaining reduced implantation and embryo development awaits further research.

Hydrosalpinx and IVF: assessment of treatments implemented prior to IVF

It is well known that the success of artificial reproductive techniques, especially IVF, for patients with tubal pathologies such as hydrosalpinx is reduced by half compared with patients without hydrosalpinx. Notably, there are also substantial increases in both early pregnancy loss and ectopic pregnancies. Alterations in the outcome of these patients generally reflect a detrimental effect of hydrosalpinx. However, although many theories have been published, a single explanation has not yet been found over a period of decades. Therefore, the negative effects of hydrosalpinx have generally been attributed largely to: (i) mechanical effects; (ii) embryo and gametotoxicity; (iii) alterations in endometrial receptivity markers; or dwindled cross talk between embryo-endometrium resulting in hindered implantation, and (iv) direct effect on endometrium, leading to intrauterine fluid formation. On the other hand, the most important question is selection of the preferred treatment option with either surgical or medical therapies. How should hydrosalpinx be managed? Does selection of the surgical method, either proximal obstruction or salpingectomy, depending on patients' clinical findings, differ in outcome, or is routine prophylactic salpingectomy needed? Additionally, the requirement for IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection is still controversial in patients with unilateral hydrosalpinx who have been treated with unilateral salpingectomy.

Laparoscopic Management of Hydrosalpinx

Hydrosalpinx is a common cause of female infertility. Lower implantation and pregnancy rates have been reported in women with hydrosalpinges. How hydrosalpinx exerts its negative effect on the implantation process is not clearly understood. Mechanical factors, toxicity of the hydrosalpingeal fluid, and receptivity dysfunction may explain the impaired IVF outcome in the presence of hydrosalpinx. Laparoscopic surgery has a place in the diagnosis and management of hydrosalpinx. Analysis of the results of laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinx underscores the positive role of laparoscopy in fertility outcomes in women with this pathological tubal disease. Laparoscopic salpingectomy should be offered in those women who have bilateral disease or in cases where hydrosalpinges are large enough to be visible on ultrasound. Further randomized trials are required to assess other surgical treatment options for hydrosalpinx, such as laparoscopic salpingostomy, laparoscopic or hysteroscopic tubal occlusion, and drainage of hydrosalpinx before or during oocyte retrieval.

Effect of endometrial cavity fluid on clinical pregnancy rate in tubal embryo transfer (TET)

PURPOSE

In this study, we assess whether the endometrial cavity fluid (ECF) generated physiologically by the genital tract have negative effect on the pregnancy rate during tubal embryo transfer (TET) in patients who do not have hydrosalpinx or bilateral tubal obstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected samples from 176 women with 195 cycles receiving TET due to male factor, unexplained infertility or endometriosis from June 1999 to Dec. 2003, and divided them into two groups (group I: patient with fluid accumulation >1 mm in the anterior-posterior diameter in the uterine cavity; group II: patient without fluid accumulation in the uterine cavity). Endometrium thickness was measured as a maximal distance between anterior and posterior myometrium-endometrium interface under the long-axis view. The A-P diameter of ECF was measured via vaginal sonar on the day of ovum pick-up (OPU).

RESULTS

From a total of 195 ART cycles involving 176 patients, the accumulation of ECF was detected in 10 cycles (5.1%). Seven of ten cycles (70%) with the accumulation of ECF were proved to be pregnant clinically. However, in the rest 185 cycles (group II), 98 of them (53%) were proved to be pregnant. At the mean time, the implantation rate was 29.03% and 25.71% in the groups I and II, respectively. No significant difference of the clinical pregnancy rate and the implantation rate was found between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our study, if the ECF was generated physiologically by the genital tract during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), the clinical pregnancy rate is not worse and no influence of embryo implantation was found.

Proximal tubal occlusion and salpingectomy result in similar improvement in in vitro fertilization outcome in patients with hydrosalpinx

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the clinical impact of proximal tubal occlusion and salpingectomy when performed before IVF in patients with hydrosalpinges.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized study.

SETTING

Assisted reproduction unit in an obstetrics and gynecology department in a university hospital in Greece as well as assisted reproduction unit in an urban clinic in a major city in Greece.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred fifteen patients with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinges who were candidates for IVF treatment.

INTERVENTION(S)

Laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion, laparoscopic salpingectomy, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, IVF, and embryo transfer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Implantation rate, clinical-pregnancy rate, ongoing-pregnancy rate, abortion rate, and ectopic-pregnancy rate.

RESULT(S)

Patients who underwent proximal tubal occlusion before IVF demonstrated significantly increased implantation, clinical-pregnancy, and ongoing-pregnancy rates compared with those with no surgical intervention and demonstrated implantation, clinical-pregnancy, and ongoing-pregnancy rates comparable to those who underwent salpingectomy.

CONCLUSION(S)

Proximal tubal occlusion, when performed in women with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinges before their IVF treatment, represents a potentially beneficial surgical procedure, increasing significantly the chances for successful implantation and for clinical and ongoing pregnancy. Proximal tubal occlusion may be viewed as a valid alternative when salpingectomy is technically difficult or not feasible.

Presence of hydrosalpinx correlated to endometrial inflammatory response in vivo

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the inflammatory response and mediators in the endometrium of patients with hydrosalpinges compared with normal controls.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

Urban medical center.

PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S)

Hysterectomy samples were identified as being affected by hydrosalpinx or salpingitis (n = 30) and were age-matched with control samples (n = 30).

INTERVENTIONS

Fallopian tube and endometrial slides were analyzed for leukocytes and immunohistochemical techniques performed for cytokines (interleukin-2 [IL-2]).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Evaluate and compare the endometrial inflammatory response (leukocytes and cytokines) from samples affected and non-affected by hydrosalpinx and salpingitis.

RESULT(S)

Examination of tubal and endometrial slides with hydrosalpinx demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the number of overall inflammatory cells. High-intensity immunohistochemical staining for IL-2 was demonstrated in 7.4% of controls versus 65% of cases.

CONCLUSION(S)

A defined, identifiable, local response to hydrosalpingeal fluid has been demonstrated in the endometrium. This response consists of statistically significant elevations of leukocytes and IL-2. An inflammatory endometrial response may be an independent contributor to the decreased reproductive outcome observed in patients with hydrosalpinges.