Fracturing osteoporosis after kidney transplantation--what are the options?

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Homocysteine, Parathormone, Vitamin D3, and Bone Mineral Densitometry in Recipients of Kidney Transplant

PURPOSE

In this study, we evaluated the relationship between serum homocysteine level and proteinuria, parathyroid hormone, vitamin D, and bone mineral density in kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 117 stable KTR older than 18 years was followed in our outpatient clinic. Demographic data were recorded. Simultaneously biochemical parameters, including glucose, blood urea nitrogenous, creatinine, calcium, phosphorus, sodium, potassium, albumin, parathormone, vitamin D₃, homocysteine, vitamin B₁₂, folate, and 24-hour urine protein, and bone mineral density of the femoral neck and spine by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) were measured.

RESULTS

DEXA measurements were normal, osteoporotic, and osteopenic (12.3%, 36.3%, and 51.3%, respectively). There was a relationship between the serum homocysteine and usage of rapamycin (P = .05), statins (P = .057), and beta blockers (P = .01), DEXA measurements were not related with serum homocysteine levels and immunosuppressive drugs used. Serum homocysteine levels correlated negatively with blood urea nitrogen (P = .002), creatinine (P = .001), vitamin B₁₂ (P < .001), and a positively daily proteinuria (rho = 0.203, P = .031). There was a negative relationship between proteinuria and serum level of vitamin D.

CONCLUSIONS

The bone mineral density decreased in more than 87% of our KTR. We did not find any relationship between DEXA measurements and levels of homocysteine, vitamin D, parathormone, and immunosuppressive drugs. It should be noted that some drugs used may affect serum homocysteine levels. Interestingly, there was a relationship between proteinuria and serum levels of homocysteine and vitamin D. Therefore, serum levels of homocysteine and vitamin D should be evaluated for preventing renal damage in KTR.

Alendronate as an effective treatment for bone loss and vascular calcification in kidney transplant recipients

Kidney transplant recipients develop secondary osteoporosis induced by immunosuppressive medication, with a high risk of fracture, and abdominal aortic calcification (AC) is a known predictor of cardiovascular mortality. In this study of 12 stable kidney recipients, we estimated the preventive effect of bisphosphonate treatment on bone loss and progression of AC. We randomly divided the subjects into a treatment group with alendronate (group A: 5 subjects) and a control group (group C: 7 subjects). Group A patients received 35 mg/week of alendronate over 24 months, while group C patients were not administered with any bisphosphonates. Two major endpoints were established: (1) the time-dependent change in bone mineral density (BMD) estimated with DEXA and (2) progression of abdominal AC, calculated twice as an index (ACI) using computed tomography data. Over the 2-year study period, group A patients showed significantly increased BMD of 1.86 ± 0.85% (P = 0.015 versus baseline), and almost complete inhibition of ACI progression (38.2 ± 24.2% to 39.6 ± 24.3%), but group C patients showed a decrease in BMD decline with bone loss and progression of ACI (32.8 ± 25.0% to 37.8 ± 29.2%, P = 0.061). In conclusion, alendronate therapy was an effective treatment in kidney transplant recipients for secondary osteoporosis and vascular calcification as ectopic calcification. This clinical trial is registered with number JMA-IIA00155 of JMACCT CTR.

Oral alendronate can suppress bone turnover but not fracture in kidney transplantation recipients with hyperparathyroidism and chronic kidney disease

Post-transplantation bone diseases negatively affect the quality of life of solid organ recipients. Secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism is a frequent complication in kidney transplantation (KTx) recipients. Treatment with immunosuppressive agents including glucocorticoids can lead to deterioration in bone metabolism in these patients. In the present study, we explored the effects of a three-year treatment period with oral alendronate (ALN) in long-term KTx recipients. Post-KTx recipients were recruited (n = 24, M/F = 12/12, mean age 52.0 ± 7.8 years) into this study. All patients were prescribed methylprednisolone (4.07 ± 0.86 mg/day) with various immunosuppressive agents. Before treatment with oral ALN (35 mg/week), the mean concentrations of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D were 139.2 ± 71.4 pg/mL and 20.8 ± 4.1 ng/mL, respectively. After 36 months of ALN treatment, mean iPTH levels increased slightly (+20.9 %). Treatment with ALN reduced bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (-35.4 %), serum type I collagen N-terminal telopeptide (-31.2 %) and osteocalcin (-55.6 %) levels. ALN did not increase bone mass after 24 months. Four patients with the highest baseline iPTH levels suffered a clinical osteoporotic fracture during the 36-month ALN treatment period. Higher iPTH levels with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at baseline were associated with the incidence of new clinical fractures during ALN treatment. In conclusion, anti-resorptive therapy with ALN can suppress bone turnover even when iPTH concentration is elevated in long-term KTx recipients. However, hyperparathyroidism with CKD seems to be associated with new clinical fractures during ALN treatment.

Long-term fracture risk following renal transplantation: a population-based study

Abnormal bone metabolism is a recognized complication of end-stage renal disease, but fracture risk following renal transplantation has not been well quantified. We followed the 86 Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents who underwent initial renal transplantation in 1965-1995 for 911 person-years (median, 10.6 years per subject) in a retrospective cohort study. Fractures, and possible risk factors, were assessed through review of each subject's complete community medical records. Altogether, 117 fractures were observed during follow-up extending to 33 years. The cumulative incidence of any fracture at 15 years was 60% versus 20% expected ( P<0.001). There was a significantly increased risk of fractures generally [standardized incidence ratio (SIR), 4.8; 95% CI, 3.6-6.4] and vertebral (SIR, 23.1; 95% CI, 12.3-39.6) and foot fractures (SIR, 8.4; 95% CI, 5.1-12.9) especially. Age at first transplantation, renal failure due to diabetes, pancreas transplantation, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease and blindness were all associated with overall fracture risk. In a multivariate analysis, however, only age and diabetic nephropathy were independent predictors of fracture risk generally, while higher activity status was protective. Diabetes was the only independent predictor of lower limb fractures, whereas age and osteoporosis history predicted vertebral fractures. Cumulative corticosteroid dosage was not associated with increased fracture risk in this analysis. Despite the fact that our patients had few risk factors for preexisting bone disease attendant to postmenopausal osteoporosis, prior corticosteroid use or renal osteodystrophy, these data indicate that renal transplantation is associated with a significant increase in fracture risk among unselected patients in the community. Diabetic patients, particularly, experience excess lower limb fractures. Patients and their care providers should be aware of this elevated fracture risk, which continues long-term.

Hospitalizations for fractures after renal transplantation in the United States

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and associated mortality of fractures in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Retrospective registry study of 33,479 patients in the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) who received kidney transplants between 1 July 1994 and 30 June 1997. Associations with hospitalizations for a primary discharge diagnosis of fractures (all causes) were assessed.

RESULTS

Renal transplant recipients had an adjusted incidence ratio for fractures of 4.59 (95% confidence interval 3.29 to 6.31). In multivariate analysis, recipients with prevalent fractures, as well as recipients who were Caucasian, women, in the lower quartiles of recipient weight (<95.9 kg), had end stage renal disease caused by diabetes, and had prolonged pretransplant dialysis were at increased risk for hospitalization because of fractures after transplantation. Recipients hospitalized for hip fractures had decreased all-cause survival (hazard ratio for mortality 1.60, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.26) in Cox Regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In the early post-transplant course (<3 years), renal transplant recipients had a greater incidence of fractures than the general population, which were associated with decreased patient survival. Preventive efforts should focus on recipients with the risk factors identified in this analysis, most of which can be easily obtained through history and physical examination.

Recommendations for the outpatient surveillance of renal transplant recipients. American Society of Transplantation

Many complications after renal transplantation can be prevented if they are detected early. Guidelines have been developed for the prevention of diseases in the general population, but there are no comprehensive guidelines for the prevention of diseases and complications after renal transplantation. Therefore, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation developed these guidelines to help physicians and other health care workers provide optimal care for renal transplant recipients. The guidelines are also intended to indirectly help patients receive the access to care that they need to ensure long-term allograft survival, by attempting to systematically define what that care encompasses. The guidelines are applicable to all adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, and they cover the outpatient screening for and prevention of diseases and complications that commonly occur after renal transplantation. They do not cover the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and complications after they become manifest, and they do not cover the pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates. The guidelines are comprehensive, but they do not pretend to cover every aspect of care. As much as possible, the guidelines are evidence-based, and each recommendation has been given a subjective grade to indicate the strength of evidence that supports the recommendation. It is hoped that these guidelines will provide a framework for additional discussion and research that will improve the care of renal transplant recipients.

Withdrawal of steroids from triple-drug therapy in kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

In renal transplant patients with stable graft function, triple-drug immunosuppression may not be necessary, while withdrawal of steroids may eliminate side effects. The primary aim of this study was to assess the risk of rejection after steroid withdrawal.

METHODS

A total of 88 patients with stable graft function and serum creatinine <160 micromol/l, treated with cyclosporin A, azathioprine and prednisone were randomized into group A (n=46) with a gradual prednisone reduction to zero in the course of 6 months, and group B (n=42) on triple-drug therapy without change. At the time of randomization, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was carried out in all of the patients. After stopping steroids, the patients were followed up for a period of 12 months.

RESULTS

Four patients failed to complete steroid withdrawal, three due to rejection, and one due to leukopenia. The proportion of rejection in three patients in group A (6.6%) was not significantly different from rejection in two patients in group B (4.8%). The mean value of serum creatinine was not significantly different in both groups in the course of follow-up. A finding of some degree of immunological activity in FNAB was made in four patients in each group, but none of these patients developed rejection. Compared with group B, significant decreases in serum cholesterol and blood leukocytes were observed in group A. Prednisone withdrawal did not have any influence on hypertension and serum triglycerides.

CONCLUSIONS

Gradual withdrawal of steroids is not associated with a higher risk for rejection and has a beneficial effect on serum total cholesterol levels. FNAB was not a useful tool for predicting rejection.

The fate of bone after renal transplantation

Post-renal-transplantation bone disease is a well known entity. Immunosuppressive agents and persistence of hyperparathyroidism have primarily been implicated in its etiology. Renal transplantation patients are unique in that the bone changes occur on a background of pre-existing renal osteodystrophy. This review focuses on post-renal-transplantation bone disease. Unfortunately, the existing data in the review period, besides being scanty, provide conflicting information. This is due to the diversity of immunosuppressive regimens employed, the patient populations studied, diagnostic tools and criteria used by different centers, and the lack of formal trials.

No trend toward a spontaneous improvement of hyperparathyroidism and high bone turnover in normocalcemic long-term renal transplant recipients

Although hyperparathyroidism is a common feature in renal transplant recipients, the long-term course of parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion in these patients is not well established, and the actual contribution of PTH to posttransplant bone disease remains incompletely understood. Therefore, we studied calcium-regulating hormones and serum osteocalcin, as a marker of bone remodeling, in 82 normocalcemic renal transplant recipients with good renal function who had received a graft 6 to 73 months previously and in 82 healthy subjects matched for age and sex. In all subjects, fasting serum and 24-hour urinary samples were collected. The transplant recipients had excessive PTH secretion (serum PTH, 6.9 +/- 0.5 pmol/L in recipients v 3.0 +/- 0.1 pmol/L in healthy subjects; P < 0.001) and high bone turnover (osteocalcin, 16.6 +/- 0.8 microg/L v 8.0 +/- 0.3 microg/L; P < 0.001). (Values are mean +/- SEM.) In addition, transplant recipients had a slightly higher ionized calcium than the healthy subjects, providing definite evidence of an inappropriate PTH secretion in renal transplant recipients. Furthermore, in subgroups of 25 recipients and 25 healthy controls matched for creatinine clearance, the results superimposed those obtained in the whole groups, suggesting that excessive PTH secretion and high bone turnover in renal transplant recipients did not merely reflect the moderately reduced renal function of some recipients. In the whole group of transplant recipients, PTH correlated positively with osteocalcin (r = 0.40; P < 0.001), suggesting that PTH contributes at least partly to posttransplant bone disease. Conversely, there was no correlation between serum PTH or osteocalcin and the delay from grafting. Therefore, our results provide no evidence for a spontaneous improvement of either persistent hyperparathyroidism or high bone turnover in normocalcemic long-term renal transplant recipients.