Hepatitis C virus infection in chronic haemodialysis patients, a clinicopathologic study

Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dialysis is a replacement therapy for patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Patients on dialysis are at high risk of acquiring hepatitis C virus (HCV), which has become a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. There is a wide range of prevalence of HCV in dialysis populations around the world. It is still unknown how prevalent HCV infection is among worldwide dialysis patients (including those undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis). A review was conducted to estimate the global epidemiology of hepatitis C in dialysis patients. We searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Global Index Medicus and Web of Science until October 2022. A manual search of references from relevant articles was also conducted. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the χ2 test on Cochrane's Q statistic, and the sources of heterogeneity were investigated using subgroup analysis. In order to assess publication bias, funnel plots and Egger tests were conducted, and pooled HCV prevalence estimates were generated using a DerSimonian and Laird meta-analysis model. The study is registered with PROSPERO under CRD42022237789. We included 634 papers involving 392160 participants. The overall HCV case fatality rate was 38.7% (95% CI = 28.9-49). The global prevalence of HCV infection in dialysis population group were 24.3% [95% CI = 22.6-25.9]. As indicated by UNSD region, country, dialysis type, and HCV diagnostic targeted; Eastern Europe had the highest prevalence of 48.6% [95% CI = 35.2-62], Indonesia had 63.6% [95% CI = 42.9-82], hemodialysis patients had 25.5% [95% CI = 23.8-27.3], and anti-HCV were detected in 24.5% [95% CI = 22.8-26.2]. Dialysis patients, particularly those on hemodialysis, have a high prevalence and case fatality rate of HCV infection. Hemodialysis units need to implement strict infection control measures.

Liver enzymes serum levels in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis: a comprehensive review

We reviewed the literature regarding the serum levels of the enzymes aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis with and without viral hepatitis. Original articles published up to January 2013 on adult patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis were selected. These articles contained the words "transaminases" "aspartate aminotransferase" "alanine aminotransferase" "gamma glutamyl transferase," "liver enzymes", AND "dialysis" OR "hemodialysis". A total of 823 articles were retrieved. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 49 articles were selected. The patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis had reduced serum levels of aminotransferases due to hemodilution, lower pyridoxine levels, or elevated homocysteine levels. The chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis infected with the hepatitis C virus also had lower aminotransferase levels compared with the infected patients without chronic kidney disease. This reduction is in part due to decreased viremia caused by the dialysis method, the production of a hepatocyte growth factor and endogenous interferon-α, and lymphocyte activation, which decreases viral action on hepatocytes. Few studies were retrieved on gamma-glutamyl transferase serum levels; those found reported that there were no differences between the patients with or without chronic kidney disease. The serum aminotransferase levels were lower in the patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis (with or without viral hepatitis) than in the patients with normal renal function; this reduction has a multifactorial origin.

Hepatitis C and kidney disease

Multiple extrahepatic manifestations have been associated with chronic hepatitis C, the most important among them being cryoglobulinemia, glomerulonephritis, porphyria cutanea tarda, lichen planus, seronegative arthritis, and lymphoproliferative disorders as in the sudies of Bonkovsky and Mehta (2001) and El-Serag et al. (2002). We will discuss in this paper chronic hepatitis C- related kidney disease and course and management of patients with chronic hepatitis C in special circumstances like hemodialysis and kidney transplantation.

Meta-analysis: Effect of hepatitis C virus infection on mortality in dialysis

BACKGROUND

The natural history of hepatitis C virus infection among patients on long-term dialysis treatment remains incompletely understood. Efforts to elucidate the natural history of hepatitis C virus in this population are difficult because of the slowly progressive nature of hepatitis C virus with often an unrecognized onset in patients whose life-expectancy is substantially diminished by end-stage renal disease.

AIM

To conduct a systematic review of the published medical literature concerning the impact of hepatitis C virus infection on the survival of patients receiving chronic dialysis. The relative risk of mortality was regarded as the most reliable outcome end-point.

METHODS

We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to generate a summary estimate of the relative risk for mortality with hepatitis C virus across the published studies.

RESULTS

We identified four clinical trials (2341 unique patients); three (75%) of them were prospective, cohort studies; the fourth was a case-control study. Pooling of study results demonstrated that presence of antihepatitis C virus antibody was an independent and significant risk factor for death in patients on maintenance dialysis. The summary estimate for relative risk was 1.57 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.33-1.86. A test for homogeneity of the relative risks across the four studies gave a P-value of 0.77. As a cause of death, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis were significantly more frequent among antihepatitis C virus-positive than -negative dialysis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that antihepatitis C virus-positive patients on dialysis have an increased risk of mortality compared with hepatitis C virus-negative patients. The excess risk of death in hepatitis C virus-positive patients may be at least partially attributed to chronic liver disease with its attendant complications. Clinical trials with extended follow-up are currently under way to assess the effect of hepatitis C virus treatment on the excess risk of mortality in this population.

Spectrum of liver damage and correlation with clinical and laboratory parameters in HCV infected hemodialysis patients

There are conflicting results in studies concerning the best marker for liver histopathological features of HCV infection in HD patients. We planned a prospective study to follow HCV viremia and laboratory parameters of HD patients and correlate these with clinic features and histopathological findings. We included 68 HCV infected patients (45 male, 23 female, age: 39.8 +/- 11.9 years, HD duration: 58.2 +/- 36.4 months) in our study. The follow-up period after the biopsy was 33.2 +/- 20.3 months. Patients liver enzyme (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT)) levels were determined monthly and ferritin levels every three months, and the mean value was recorded. We also screened patients for HCV RNA. During the follow-up period, 22 (32.4%) of the patients had positive RNA, 26 (38.2%) negative RNA. 20 (29.4%) had intermittent RNA positivity. The patients with high grade of portal necroinflammatory activity had significantly higher AST and ALT levels. In addition patients with high grade lobular activity had significantly shorter HD and HCV infection duration and higher AST, ALT and ferritin levels. AST levels were negatively correlated with duration of HD and HCV infection, and positively correlated with GGT and ferritin levels. Additionally, we found that ALT levels were negatively correlated with HD duration and positively correlated with GGT levels. ALT levels higher than 30 U/L were reflected necroinflammatory activity more significantly than levels higher than 40 U/L. Cirrhosis was detected in 5.9% of the patients, and we could not find any laboratory parameter that was correlated with stage of fibrosis. Although there is a high degree of liver involvement, cirrhosis is a relatively less frequent finding in HD patients. Serum aminotransferases and ferritin levels but not the pattern of HCV viremia are predictors of necroinflammatory activity in liver biopsy specimens. Liver biopsy obligatory to assess the disease activity in HD patients.

Interferon-alpha in chronic hepatitis C infection in dialysis patients

This study assesses the efficacy and adverse effects of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) administered at a dosage of 3 million units three times weekly for 1 year in 17 hemodialysis patients with hepatitic C virus (HCV)-associated chronic hepatitis (biopsy proven). The patients were prospectively followed up for a period of 18 months. Liver biopsy was repeated after 6 months of treatment in 13 patients. Patients were classified according to the histological activity index. Biochemical and virological responses were evaluated at the end (end-of-treatment response) and 6 months after completion of therapy (sustained response). HCV RNA became negative in 76% of the patients after 12 weeks of treatment, in 88% after 12 months of treatment, and in 71% of the patients 6 months after completion of therapy. HCV genotype 4 was found in 60% of our population. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were initially increased in only 6 patients and normalized in 4 of these patients after 12 weeks of therapy, with end-of-treatment and sustained biochemical responses of 83% and 67%, respectively. Of 13 patients who underwent liver biopsies after 6 months of therapy, 11 patients (85%) showed histological improvement. One patient could not tolerate therapy because of marked lethargy and myalgia; the other patients had minor side effects that did not require discontinuation of treatment. Two patients received a cadaveric renal transplant after 1 year of IFN treatment, and they continued to maintain biochemical and virological responses after a follow-up of 17 and 28 months, respectively.

Blood-borne virus infections in dialysis units--a review

Hepatitis outbreaks in haemodialysis unit patients and staff were reported in the late 1960s. In 1972, the Rosenheim report in the UK established guidelines which included routine tests for hepatitis B surface antigen and isolation facilities for dialysing patients with hepatitis B virus which resulted in a dramatic fall in cases of hepatitis. However, since these guidelines were introduced, other blood-borne viruses, notably HCV and HIV have been discovered, and failures of infection control practices still lead to outbreaks of HBV in haemodialysis units. The prevalence of HCV in dialysis patients varies considerably throughout the world, with reported prevalence ranging from 3.9% to 71%. The number of blood transfusions and the length of time on dialysis have consistently been associated with HCV prevalence. Several reports provide evidence of patient-to-patient HCV transmission with environmental blood contamination the most significant factor in intra-unit transmission. There is no evidence that HCV has been transmitted by re-use of dialysis machines but being dialysed next to an HCV positive patient is associated with a significant risk of HCV acquisition. Several studies have shown that dialysing HCV positive patients in a separate unit or in a defined sector of a dialysis unit significantly reduces nosocomial HCV infection. HGV is prevalent in dialysis units where there is evidence of transmission to patients but no evidence of associated symptoms. HIV is infrequently transmitted in dialysis units and several units treating many HIV-positive patients have shown no evidence of transmission. Careful attention needs to be paid to infection control procedures and regular virological testing.

Hepatitis C in haemodialysis and nonuraemic patients: a histopathological study

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the major cause of posttransfusion non-A, non-B hepatitis. Haemodialysis patients carry the risk of HCV infection. The aim of this study is to compare the morphological changes related to chronic HCV infection found in haemodialysis and nonuraemic patients. Liver biopsies from nine haemodialysis patients and 37 patients with normal renal function were studied. This study shows that haemodialysis patients may have less active and progressive chronic hepatitis C than patients with normal renal function. The number of patients in this study is limited, therefore further studies are needed for definite conclusion.

Hepatitis C infection in transplantation

This review emphasizes the role of HCV in the transplant setting. Prolonged HCV infection results in end-stage liver disease and as such represents a common indication for liver transplantation. Recurrence of infection is almost universal after transplantation in those with viremia before transplantation. Acquired disease is uncommon but nevertheless important, particularly in organ populations in whom screening for infection is not routine. The natural history of post-transplantation disease suggests that the effect on graft or patient survival is minor, at least during short-term follow-up. Long-term follow-up is needed, as well as more detailed study of the factors contributing to severity of post-transplantation disease. Kidney transplant recipients are commonly infected with HCV prior to transplantation. HCV infection after transplantation is associated with an increased risk of liver disease and infectious complications, but its effect on survival is still controversial. Similarly, observations in recipients of other solid organ transplants, such as heart and lung, and bone marrow patients suggest that HCV infection usually is not a major cause of mortality in the first 5 to 10 years of follow-up. Many issues still need to be addressed. The most important is the identification of factors that contribute to disease progression. Finally, effective therapies to eradicate infection and prevent disease progression are awaited.

Serological diagnosis of hepatitis C virus in patients with liver disease in Saudi Arabia. Evaluation of antibody determination by recombinant immunoblot assays in relation to RNA detection by polymerase chain reaction

Sera from 164 Saudi Arabian patients with non-A, non-B hepatitis liver disease were examined for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) by second- and third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2 and RIBA-3) and for HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). By using RIBA-2, 92 (56.1%) were reactive, 64 (39%) were nonreactive, and 8 (4.9%) were indeterminate. By using RIBA-3, 98 (59.7%) were reactive 60 (36.6%) were nonreactive, and 6 (3.7%) were indeterminate. By using PCR, 108 (65.9%) were positive. Of the eight RIBA-2 indeterminate samples, seven became RIBA-3 reactive but PCR-positive, and one became RIBA-3 nonreactive but PCR-negative. Of the six RIBA-3 indeterminate samples, five were RIBA-2 nonreactive but PCR-positive, and one was RIBA-2 reactive but PCR-negative. From our study on Saudi patients, we conclude that RIBA-3 has slightly but not significantly improved the results of anti-HCV antibody detection, and is probably of more value to resolve those indeterminate samples by RIBA-2. Although expensive, PCR remains the most reliable HCV diagnostic method until an HCV antigen detection test is available.

New insights into hepatitis C virus infection of hemodialysis patients: the implications

The authors compared the diagnostic performance of a second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) (RIBA HCV 2.0 SIA) and the recently introduced third-generation RIBA (RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA) with that of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 55 patients on chronic hemodialysis. Compared with HCV RNA by PCR, RIBA 3.0 increased the sensitivity of HCV detection to 72% as compared with 56% of RIBA 2.0. Both assays underestimated the prevalence of HCV infection as determined by PCR. However, RIBA HCV 3.0 outperformed RIBA HCV 2.0, detecting all of the RIBA 2.0-positive patients plus an additional eight (8 of 22 RIBA 2.0 negative; confidence interval [CI] = [17.2%, 59.3%]). Forty-three of 51 patients with positive RIBA 3.0 or positive HCV RNA by PCR underwent a liver biopsy. Thirty (70%) had chronic hepatitis (three with cirrhosis), 10 (23%) had nonspecific changes, and three (7%) had normal liver histology. Thirty of 37 patients (81%) with hepatitis C viremia and positive anti-HCV had chronic hepatitis, whereas none of the viremic patients with negative anti-HCV had chronic hepatitis. Among the reactive antigens on RIBA 3.0, c33c was found to be most predictive of chronic hepatitis (P = 0.0002). Detection of HCV RNA continues to be the method of choice in the early phase of HCV infection. In places where a validated HCV RNA assay is not available, RIBA HCV 3.0 (soon to be commercially available) is a better alternative. Early detection of HCV infection and the implementation of an isolation strategy might be important in preventing the spread of HCV infection among hemodialysis patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Incidence and risk factors for hepatitis C seroconversion in hemodialysis: a prospective study. The UCL Collaborative Group

To delineate the incidence and risk factors for seroconversion (SC) for HCV, from May 1991 to November 1992 we followed all 401 patients (no i.v. drug abusers) dialyzed in 15 Belgian hemodialysis (HD) units, none of which isolates anti-HCV (+) patients. The sensitive ELISA II test was performed in the same laboratory for all patients. ELISA II (+) sera were considered truly positive if specific antibodies were detected by RIBA II against at least one HCV antigen. Blood transfusions given from 12 months prior to inclusion in the study, dialyzer reuse and frequency of dialysis monitor sterilization were recorded. In May 1991, prevalence of truly positive ELISA II tests averaged 13.5% (54/399). During the three consecutive six-month periods, ELISA II became truly positive in 3 of 305 (1%), 4 of 314 (1.3%) and 1 of 313 (0.3%) patients, respectively, which was an average yearly incidence of 1.7%. SC was preceded (1 to 6 months) in all cases by an unexplained, unprecedented increase in the alanine aminotransferase level. The mean monthly rate of transfusions was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in eight patients with SC (0.7 +/- 0.6 U) than in 393 patients without SC (0.1 +/- 0.01 U). However, three of eight patients with SC had not been transfused at all. SC was observed in only 3 of 13 units (1, 3 and 4 cases, respectively) dialyzing ELISA (+) patients. In the unit with three SC, patients were always assigned a fixed station: SC was observed only in patients dialyzed next to an ELISA II (+) patient (3 of 8 vs. 0 of 30, P < 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Detection of hepatitis C infection by polymerase chain reaction among hemodialysis patients

One hundred forty-five patients on regular hemodialysis (HD) at our institution were evaluated for the presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Forty-three patients (29%) were found to have detectable antibodies to HCV using second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent and recombinant immunoblot assays. Forty positive patients (anti-HCV+) and 10 negative patients (anti-HCV-) were tested for direct detection of the HCV genome by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Twenty-one anti-HCV+ patients (52%) had detectable RNA HCV in plasma (PCR+). No anti-HCV- patient had viremia. In addition, we compared the 43 anti-HCV+ patients with the 102 anti-HCV- patients for duration of HD, history of blood transfusion, serologic markers of hepatitis B virus, and acute and chronic liver disease. On retrospective univariate analysis, statistically significant associations with anti-HCV+ were duration of HD (P = 0.0001), blood transfusions (P = 0.0005), co-infection with hepatitis B virus (P = 0.01), and acute and chronic liver disease (P = 0.06 and 0.01, respectively). Three significant variables (duration of HD, chronic hepatitis, and blood transfusions) of the multivariate analysis permit the classification of 65% of anti-HCV+ patients and 81% of anti-HCV- patients. In the anti-HCV+ group, when the same parameters were compared in PCR+ or PCR- patients, no statistical difference appeared. These results reveal that 52% of anti-HCV+ HD patients have HCV infection. The clinical consequences of HCV infection in that population are not characterized since no difference has been documented between PCR+ and PCR- results.

Hepatitis C infection in children and adolescents on haemodialysis and after renal transplant

Serum antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) were measured in children and adolescents on haemodialysis (HD, n = 20) and after renal transplant (RT, n = 33). Seropositivity was observed in 3 HD patients (15%) and in 7 RT patients (21.2%) with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (2nd generation) and a recombinant immunoblotting assay (2nd generation). HCV RNA was detected by the polymerase chain reaction in the 10 patients with anti-HCV antibodies. Anti-HCV positivity was significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with the number of blood transfusions and the time on HD. Transaminase levels were not useful for screening. This study confirms that there is a high risk of HCV infection in children and adolescents on HD or after RT. Moreover, HCV infection is closely related to the number of blood transfusions as well as the time on HD.