1
|
Brooks AL, Hoel D, Glines WM. Radiobiology of Select Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Waste. HEALTH PHYSICS 2022; 123:99-115. [PMID: 35506883 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
There are several important radionuclides involved in the "clean-up" or environmental isolation of nuclear waste contained in US Department of Energy Hanford Site underground waste tanks that drive many of the decisions associated with this activity. To make proper human health risk analyses and ensure that the most appropriate decisions are made, it is important to understand the radiation biology and the human health risk associated with these radionuclides. This manuscript provides some basic radiological science, in particular radiation biology, for some of these radionuclides, i.e., 3 H, 90 Sr, 137 Cs, 99 Tc, 129 I, and the alpha emitters 239, 240 Pu, 233,234,235,238 U, and 241 Am. These radionuclides were selected based on their designation as "constituents of potential concern," historical significance, or potential impact on human health risk. In addition to the radiobiology of these select radionuclides, this manuscript provides brief discussions of the estimated cost of planned management of Hanford tank waste and a comparison with releases into the Techa River from activities associated with the Mayak Production Association. A set of summary conclusions of the potential human health risks associated with these radionuclides is given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antone L Brooks
- Research Professor Emeritus, Washington State University Tri-Cities, Richland, WA
| | - David Hoel
- Medical University of South Carolina, 36 South Battery, Charleston, SC 29401
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zarnke AM, Tharmalingam S, Boreham DR, Brooks AL. BEIR VI radon: The rest of the story. Chem Biol Interact 2019; 301:81-87. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2018.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
3
|
Brooks AL. The impact of dose rate on the linear no threshold hypothesis. Chem Biol Interact 2019; 301:68-80. [PMID: 30763551 DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 11/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The goal of this manuscript is to define the role of dose rate and dose protraction on the induction of biological changes at all levels of biological organization. Both total dose and the time frame over which it is delivered are important as the body has great capacity to repair all types of biological damage. The importance of dose rate has been recognized almost from the time that radiation was discovered and has been included in radiation standards as a Dose, Dose Rate, Effectiveness Factor (DDREF) and a Dose Rate Effectiveness Factor (DREF). This manuscript will evaluate the role of dose rate at the molecular, cellular, tissue, experimental animals and humans to demonstrate that dose rate is an important variable in estimating radiation cancer risk and other biological effects. The impact of low-dose rates on the Linear-No-Threshold Hypothesis (LNTH) will be reviewed since if the LNTH is not valid it is not possible to calculate a single value for a DDREF or DREF. Finally, extensive human experience is briefly reviewed to show that the radiation risks are not underestimated and that radiation at environmental levels has limited impact on total human cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antone L Brooks
- Environmental Science, Washington State University, Richland, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sridharan DM, Asaithamby A, Blattnig SR, Costes SV, Doetsch PW, Dynan WS, Hahnfeldt P, Hlatky L, Kidane Y, Kronenberg A, Naidu MD, Peterson LE, Plante I, Ponomarev AL, Saha J, Snijders AM, Srinivasan K, Tang J, Werner E, Pluth JM. Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure. LIFE SCIENCES IN SPACE RESEARCH 2016; 9:19-47. [PMID: 27345199 PMCID: PMC5613937 DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2016.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Robust predictive models are essential to manage the risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis. Chronic exposure to cosmic rays in the context of the complex deep space environment may place astronauts at high cancer risk. To estimate this risk, it is critical to understand how radiation-induced cellular stress impacts cell fate decisions and how this in turn alters the risk of carcinogenesis. Exposure to the heavy ion component of cosmic rays triggers a multitude of cellular changes, depending on the rate of exposure, the type of damage incurred and individual susceptibility. Heterogeneity in dose, dose rate, radiation quality, energy and particle flux contribute to the complexity of risk assessment. To unravel the impact of each of these factors, it is critical to identify sensitive biomarkers that can serve as inputs for robust modeling of individual risk of cancer or other long-term health consequences of exposure. Limitations in sensitivity of biomarkers to dose and dose rate, and the complexity of longitudinal monitoring, are some of the factors that increase uncertainties in the output from risk prediction models. Here, we critically evaluate candidate early and late biomarkers of radiation exposure and discuss their usefulness in predicting cell fate decisions. Some of the biomarkers we have reviewed include complex clustered DNA damage, persistent DNA repair foci, reactive oxygen species, chromosome aberrations and inflammation. Other biomarkers discussed, often assayed for at longer points post exposure, include mutations, chromosome aberrations, reactive oxygen species and telomere length changes. We discuss the relationship of biomarkers to different potential cell fates, including proliferation, apoptosis, senescence, and loss of stemness, which can propagate genomic instability and alter tissue composition and the underlying mRNA signatures that contribute to cell fate decisions. Our goal is to highlight factors that are important in choosing biomarkers and to evaluate the potential for biomarkers to inform models of post exposure cancer risk. Because cellular stress response pathways to space radiation and environmental carcinogens share common nodes, biomarker-driven risk models may be broadly applicable for estimating risks for other carcinogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Steve R Blattnig
- Langley Research Center, Langley Research Center (LaRC), VA, United States
| | - Sylvain V Costes
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Lynn Hlatky
- CCSB-Tufts School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yared Kidane
- Wyle Science, Technology & Engineering Group, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Amy Kronenberg
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
| | - Mamta D Naidu
- CCSB-Tufts School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Leif E Peterson
- Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ianik Plante
- Wyle Science, Technology & Engineering Group, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Artem L Ponomarev
- Wyle Science, Technology & Engineering Group, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Janapriya Saha
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | | | | | - Jonathan Tang
- Exogen Biotechnology, Inc., Berkeley, CA, United States
| | | | - Janice M Pluth
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Over the past 15 years and more, extensive research has been conducted on the responses of biological systems to radiation delivered at a low dose or low dose rate. This research has demonstrated that the molecular-, cellular-, and tissue-level responses are different following low doses than those observed after a single short-term high-dose radiation exposure. Following low-dose exposure, 3 unique responses were observed, these included bystander effects, adaptive protective responses, and genomic instability. Research on the mechanisms of action for each of these observations demonstrates that the molecular and cellular processes activated by low doses of radiation are often related to protective responses, whereas high-dose responses are often associated with extensive damage such as cell killing, tissue disruption, and inflammatory diseases. Thus, the mechanisms of action are unique for low-dose radiation exposure. When the dose is delivered at a low dose rate, the responses typically differ at all levels of biological organization. These data suggest that there must be a dose rate effectiveness factor that is greater than 1 and that the risk following low-dose rate exposure is likely less than that for single short-term exposures. All these observations indicate that using the linear no-threshold model for radiation protection purposes is conservative. Low-dose research therefore supports the current standards and practices. When a nuclear medical procedure is justified, it should be carried out with optimization (lowest radiation dose commensurate with diagnostic or therapeutic outcome).
Collapse
|
6
|
Seth I, Schwartz JL, Stewart RD, Emery R, Joiner MC, Tucker JD. Neutron exposures in human cells: bystander effect and relative biological effectiveness. PLoS One 2014; 9:e98947. [PMID: 24896095 PMCID: PMC4045982 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Bystander effects have been observed repeatedly in mammalian cells following photon and alpha particle irradiation. However, few studies have been performed to investigate bystander effects arising from neutron irradiation. Here we asked whether neutrons also induce a bystander effect in two normal human lymphoblastoid cell lines. These cells were exposed to fast neutrons produced by targeting a near-monoenergetic 50.5 MeV proton beam at a Be target (17 MeV average neutron energy), and irradiated-cell conditioned media (ICCM) was transferred to unirradiated cells. The cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay was used to quantify genetic damage in radiation-naïve cells exposed to ICCM from cultures that received 0 (control), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3 or 4 Gy neutrons. Cells grown in ICCM from irradiated cells showed no significant increase in the frequencies of micronuclei or nucleoplasmic bridges compared to cells grown in ICCM from sham irradiated cells for either cell line. However, the neutron beam has a photon dose-contamination of 5%, which may modulate a neutron-induced bystander effect. To determine whether these low doses of contaminating photons can induce a bystander effect, cells were irradiated with cobalt-60 at doses equivalent to the percent contamination for each neutron dose. No significant increase in the frequencies of micronuclei or bridges was observed at these doses of photons for either cell line when cultured in ICCM. As expected, high doses of photons induced a clear bystander effect in both cell lines for micronuclei and bridges (p<0.0001). These data indicate that neutrons do not induce a bystander effect in these cells. Finally, neutrons had a relative biological effectiveness of 2.0 ± 0.13 for micronuclei and 5.8 ± 2.9 for bridges compared to cobalt-60. These results may be relevant to radiation therapy with fast neutrons and for regulatory agencies setting standards for neutron radiation protection and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isheeta Seth
- Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey L. Schwartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Robert D. Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Robert Emery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Michael C. Joiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America
| | - James D. Tucker
- Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Buonanno M, Garty G, Grad M, Gendrel M, Hobert O, Brenner DJ. Microbeam irradiation of C. elegans nematode in microfluidic channels. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2013; 52:531-537. [PMID: 23942865 PMCID: PMC3809145 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-013-0485-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Accepted: 07/18/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
To perform high-throughput studies on the biological effects of ionizing radiation in vivo, we have implemented a microfluidic tool for microbeam irradiation of Caenorhabditis elegans. The device allows the immobilization of worms with minimal stress for a rapid and controlled microbeam irradiation of multiple samples in parallel. Adapted from an established design, our microfluidic clamp consists of 16 tapered channels with 10-μm-thin bottoms to ensure charged particle traversal. Worms are introduced into the microfluidic device through liquid flow between an inlet and an outlet, and the size of each microchannel guarantees that young adult worms are immobilized within minutes without the use of anesthesia. After site-specific irradiation with the microbeam, the worms can be released by reversing the flow direction in the clamp and collected for analysis of biological endpoints such as repair of radiation-induced DNA damage. For such studies, minimal sample manipulation and reduced use of drugs such as anesthetics that might interfere with normal physiological processes are preferable. By using our microfluidic device that allows simultaneous immobilization and imaging for irradiation of several whole living samples on a single clamp, here we show that 4.5-MeV proton microbeam irradiation induced DNA damage in wild-type C. elegans, as assessed by the formation of Rad51 foci that are essential for homologous repair of radiation-induced DNA damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Buonanno
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, 136 S. Broadway, P.O. Box 21, Irvington, NY, 10533, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hu B, Zhu J, Zhou H, Hei TK. No significant level of inheritable interchromosomal aberrations in the progeny of bystander primary human fibroblast after alpha particle irradiation. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON SPACE RESEARCH (COSPAR) 2013; 51:450-457. [PMID: 23503090 PMCID: PMC3596834 DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
A major concern for bystander effects is the probability that normal healthy cells adjacent to the irradiated cells become genomically unstable and undergo further carcinogenesis after therapeutic irradiation or space mission where astronauts are exposed to low dose of heavy ions. Genomic instability is a hallmark of cancer cells. In the present study, two irradiation protocols were performed in order to ensure pure populations of bystander cells and the genomic instability in their progeny were investigated. After irradiation, chromosomal aberrations of cells were analyzed at designated time points using G2 phase premature chromosome condensation (G2-PCC) coupled with Giemsa staining and with multiplex fluorescent in situ hybridization (mFISH). Our Giemsa staining assay demonstrated that elevated yields of chromatid breaks were induced in the progeny of pure bystander primary fibroblasts up to 20 days after irradiation. MFISH assay showed no significant level of inheritable interchromosomal aberrations were induced in the progeny of the bystander cell groups, while the fractions of gross aberrations (chromatid breaks or chromosomal breaks) significantly increased in some bystander cell groups. These results suggest that genomic instability occurred in the progeny of the irradiation associated bystander normal fibroblasts exclude the inheritable interchromosomal aberration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burong Hu
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. of China
| | - Jiayun Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. of China
- Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P. R. of China
| | - Hongning Zhou
- Center for Radiological Research, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032
| | - Tom K. Hei
- Center for Radiological Research, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chapman KL, Kelly JW, Lee R, Goodwin EH, Kadhim MA. Tracking genomic instability within irradiated and bystander populations. J Pharm Pharmacol 2010; 60:959-68. [DOI: 10.1211/jpp.60.8.0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Over the past two decades, our understanding of radiation biology has undergone a fundamental shift in paradigms away from deterministic ‘hit-effect’ relationships and towards complex ongoing ‘cellular responses’. These responses include now familiar, but still poorly understood, phenomena associated with radiation exposure such as genomic instability and bystander effects. Although these responses share some common features (e.g. they occur at high frequency following very low doses, are heterogeneous in their induction and are observed at time points far removed from the initial radiation exposure), the precise relationship between genomic instability and bystander effects remains to be elucidated. This review will provide a synthesis of the known, and proposed, interrelationships among irradiated and bystander cellular responses to radiation. It also discusses our current experimental approach for gaining a clearer understanding of the relationship between damage induction and long-term effects in both irradiated and bystander cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim L Chapman
- School of Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK
| | - James W Kelly
- School of Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK
| | - Ryonfa Lee
- Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung mbH (GSI), Planckstr. 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Edwin H Goodwin
- Bioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS M-888, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
| | - Munira A Kadhim
- School of Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hu B, Shen B, Su Y, Geard CR, Balajee AS. Protein kinase C epsilon is involved in ionizing radiation induced bystander response in human cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2009; 41:2413-21. [PMID: 19577658 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2009] [Revised: 06/16/2009] [Accepted: 06/29/2009] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Our earlier study demonstrated the induction of PKC isoforms (betaII, PKC-alpha/beta, PKC-theta) by ionizing radiation induced bystander response in human cells. In this study, we extended our investigation to yet another important member of PKC family, PKC epsilon (PKCepsilon). PKCepsilon functions both as an anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic protein and it is the only PKC isozyme implicated in oncogenesis. Given the importance of PKCepsilon in oncogenesis, we wished to determine whether or not PKCepsilon is involved in bystander response. Gene expression array analysis demonstrated a 2-3-fold increase in PKCepsilon expression in the bystander human primary fibroblast cells that were co-cultured in double-sided Mylar dishes for 3h with human primary fibroblast cells irradiated with 5Gy of alpha-particles. The elevated PKCepsilon expression in bystander cells was verified by quantitative real time PCR. Suppression of PKCepsilon expression by small molecule inhibitor Bisindolylmaleimide IX (Ro 31-8220) considerably reduced the frequency of micronuclei (MN) induced both by 5Gy of gamma-rays (low LET) and alpha-particles (high LET) in bystander cells. Similar cytoprotective effects were observed in bystander cells after siRNA mediated silencing of PKCepsilon suggestive of its critical role in mediating some of the bystander effects (BE). Our novel study suggests the possibility that PKC signaling pathway may be a critical molecular target for suppression of ionizing radiation induced biological effects in bystander cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burong Hu
- Center for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West, 168th Street, VC-11, Room 239, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Groesser T, Cooper B, Rydberg B. Lack of Bystander Effects from High-LET Radiation for Early Cytogenetic End Points. Radiat Res 2008; 170:794-802. [DOI: 10.1667/rr1458.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2008] [Accepted: 07/28/2008] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
12
|
Hei TK, Zhou H, Ivanov VN, Hong M, Lieberman HB, Brenner DJ, Amundson SA, Geard CR. Mechanism of radiation-induced bystander effects: a unifying model. J Pharm Pharmacol 2008; 60:943-50. [PMID: 18644187 DOI: 10.1211/jpp.60.8.0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The radiation-induced bystander effect represents a paradigm shift in our understanding of the radiobiological effects of ionizing radiation, in that extranuclear and extracellular events may also contribute to the final biological consequences of exposure to low doses of radiation. Although radiation-induced bystander effects have been well documented in a variety of biological systems, the mechanism is not known. It is likely that multiple pathways are involved in the bystander phenomenon, and different cell types respond differently to bystander signalling. Using cDNA microarrays, a number of cellular signalling genes, including cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), have been shown to be causally linked to the bystander phenomenon. The observation that inhibition of the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) suppressed the bystander response further confirmed the important role of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling cascade in the bystander process. Furthermore, cells deficient in mitochondrial DNA showed a significantly reduced response to bystander signalling, suggesting a functional role of mitochondria in the signalling process. Inhibitors of nitric oxide (NO) synthase (NOS) and mitochondrial calcium uptake provided evidence that NO and calcium signalling are part of the signalling cascade. The bystander observations imply that the relevant target for various radiobiological endpoints is larger than an individual cell. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the bystander phenomenon, together with evidence of their occurrence in-vivo, will allow us to formulate a more accurate model for assessing the health effects of low doses of ionizing radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom K Hei
- Center for Radiological Research, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brooks AL, Couch L. DOE program--developing a scientific basis for responses to low-dose exposures: impact on dose-response relationships. Dose Response 2006; 5:11-25. [PMID: 18648552 DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.06-001.brooks] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The DOE Low Dose Radiation Research Program focuses on biological mechanisms involved in response to low doses of both low and high-LET radiation (< 0.1Gy). This research program represents a merging of new technologies with cutting edge biological techniques associated with genomics. This merger enables observation of radiation-induced cellular and molecular changes previously undetectable. These low-dose responses define mechanisms of interaction of radiation with living systems, and characterize the shape of dose-response. The research from this program suggests radiation paradigms regarding the involvement of radiation in the carcinogenic process. New biological phenomena observed at low doses include initial radiation-induced DNA damage and repair, changes in gene expression, adaptive responses and bystander effects. However, information from this cellular-molecular level cannot be directly extrapolated to risks in human populations. Links must be carefully developed between dose-response relationships at the cell and tissue levels and risk to human populations. The challenge and the ultimate goal of the Program is to determine if basic scientific data can be combined with more traditional epidemiological methods to improve the estimation of radiation risk from low level radiation exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antone L Brooks
- Washington State University Tri-Cities, 2710 University Drive, Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mothersill C, Seymour C. Radiation-induced bystander effects: evidence for an adaptive response to low dose exposures? Dose Response 2006; 4:283-90. [PMID: 18648593 DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.06-111.mothersill] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper reviews our current knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the induction of bystander effects by low dose, low-LET ionizing radiation and discusses how they may be related to observed adaptive responses or other protective effects of low dose exposures. Bystander effects appear to be the result of a generalized stress response in tissues or cells. The signals may be produced by all exposed cells, but the response appears to require a quorum in order to be expressed. The major response involving low LET radiation exposure discussed in the existing literature is a death response. This has many characteristics of apoptosis but is p53 independent. While a death response might appear to be adverse, the position is argued in this paper that it is in fact protective and removes damaged cells from the population. Since many cell populations carry damaged cells without being exposed to radiation, so called "background damage", it is possible that low doses exposures cause removal of cells damaged by agents other than the test dose of radiation. This mechanism would lead to the production of "U-shaped" dose response curves. In this scenario, the level of "adaptive" or beneficial response will be related to the background damage carried by the cell population. This model may be important when attempting to predict the consequences of mixed exposures involving radiation and other environmental stressors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmel Mothersill
- Medical Physics and Applied Radiation Sciences Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bowler DA, Moore SR, Macdonald DA, Smyth SH, Clapham P, Kadhim MA. Bystander-mediated genomic instability after high LET radiation in murine primary haemopoietic stem cells. Mutat Res 2006; 597:50-61. [PMID: 16414086 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2005] [Revised: 03/30/2005] [Accepted: 04/08/2005] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Communication between irradiated and unirradiated (bystander) cells can result in responses in unirradiated cells that are similar to responses in their irradiated counterparts. The purpose of the current experiment was to test the hypothesis that bystander responses will be similarly induced in primary murine stem cells under different cell culture conditions. The experimental systems used here, co-culture and media transfer, are similar in that they both restrict communication between irradiated and bystander cells to media borne factors, but are distinct in that with the media transfer technique, cells can only communicate after irradiation, and with co-culture, cells can communication before, during and after irradiation. In this set of parallel experiments, cell type, biological endpoint, and radiation quality and dose, were kept constant. In both experimental systems, clonogenic survival was significantly decreased in all groups, whether irradiated or bystander, suggesting a substantial contribution of bystander effects (BE) to cell killing. Genomic instability (GI) was induced under all radiation and bystander conditions in both experiments, including a situation where unirradiated cells were incubated with media that had been conditioned for 24h with irradiated cells. The appearance of delayed aberrations (genomic instability) 10-13 population doublings after irradiation was similar to the level of initial chromosomal damage, suggesting that the bystander factor is able to induce chromosomal alterations soon after irradiation. Whether these early alterations are related to those observed at later timepoints remains unknown. These results suggest that genomic instability may be significantly induced in a bystander cell population whether or not cells communicate during irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A Bowler
- Radiation and Genome Stability Unit, Medical Research Council, Harwell, Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0RD, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang R, Coderre JA. A Bystander Effect in Alpha-Particle Irradiations of Human Prostate Tumor Cells. Radiat Res 2005; 164:711-22. [PMID: 16296877 DOI: 10.1667/3475.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Alpha-particle exposures were used to determine whether cells of the human prostate carcinoma cell line DU-145 can produce and respond to a bystander effect signal. An apparatus for alpha-particle irradiation of cells growing as a monolayer on a 1.4-microm-thick Mylar membrane directly above an 241Am alpha-particle source was constructed and calibrated. At the cell irradiation position, the alpha-particle fluence was 998 counts/mm2 s(-1), the average alpha-particle energy was 3.14 MeV, and the average linear energy transfer was 128 keV/microm. The average dose rate to the cells growing on the Mylar surface was 1.2 Gy/min. A co-culture system was used to examine bystander effects transmitted through the medium from the directly targeted cells to tumor cells growing on an insert well beyond the range of the alpha particles. Alpha-particle doses from 0.1 to 6.0 Gy to the targeted cells on the Mylar membrane, followed by a 2-h co-incubation of the cells on the insert in the irradiated medium above the irradiated cells, all caused an approximately 50% increase in micronucleus formation in the nontargeted co-cultured cells. Addition of the radical scavenger DMSO to the medium during the irradiation and the 2-h postirradiation incubation period completely blocked the bystander effect, whereas addition of a nitric oxide scavenger had no effect. Irradiation of medium containing serum, followed by a 2-h incubation, caused no bystander effect in the co-cultured cells. When the co-cultured cells on the insert were placed into the irradiated medium above the directly targeted cells immediately (approximately 1 min) after the irradiation and co-incubated for 2 h, there was no bystander effect. These data indicate that the observed bystander effect requires that the co-cultured cells be present in the medium during the irradiation of the directly targeted cells and suggest the involvement of a short-lived radical species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Wang
- Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mothersill C, Seymour C. Radiation-induced bystander effects and adaptive responses--the Yin and Yang of low dose radiobiology? Mutat Res 2005; 568:121-8. [PMID: 15530545 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2004] [Revised: 04/30/2004] [Accepted: 06/04/2004] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Our current knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the induction of bystander effects by low doses of high or low LET ionizing radiation is reviewed. The question of what actually constitutes a protective effect is discussed in the context of adaptive (often referred to as hormetic or protective) responses. Finally the review considers critically, how bystander effects may be related to observed adaptive responses or other seemingly protective effects of low doses exposures. Bystander effects induce responses at the tissue level, which are similar to generalized stress responses. Most of the work involving low LET radiation exposure discussed in the existing literature measures a death response. Since many cell populations carry damaged cells without being exposed to radiation (so-called "background damage"), it is possible that low doses exposures cause removal of cells carrying potentially problematic lesions, prior to exposure to radiation. This mechanism could lead to the production of "U-shaped" or hormetic dose-response curves. The level of adverse, adaptive or apparently beneficial response will be related to the background damage carried by the original cell population, the level of organization at which damage or harm are scored and the precise definition of "harm". This model may be important when attempting to predict the consequences of mixed exposures involving low doses of radiation and other environmental stressors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmel Mothersill
- Medical Physics and Applied Radiation Sciences Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada L8S 4K1.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ponnaiya B, Jenkins-Baker G, Bigelow A, Marino S, Geard CR. Detection of chromosomal instability in alpha-irradiated and bystander human fibroblasts. Mutat Res 2005; 568:41-8. [PMID: 15530538 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2004] [Revised: 05/21/2004] [Accepted: 06/04/2004] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
There is increasing evidence biological responses to ionizing radiation are not confined to those cells that are directly hit, but may be seen in the progeny at subsequent generations (genomic instability) and in non-irradiated neighbors of irradiated cells (bystander effects). These so called non-targeted phenomena would have significant contributions to radiation-induced carcinogenesis, especially at low doses where only a limited number of cells in a population are directed hit. Here we present data using a co-culturing protocol examining chromosomal instability in alpha-irradiated and bystander human fibroblasts BJ1-htert. At the first cell division following exposure to 0.1 and 1Gy alpha-particles, irradiated populations demonstrated a dose dependent increase in chromosome-type aberrations. At this time bystander BJ1-htert populations demonstrated elevated chromatid-type aberrations when compared to controls. Irradiated and bystander populations were also analyzed for chromosomal aberrations as a function of time post-irradiation. When considered over 25 doublings, all irradiated and bystander populations had significantly higher frequencies of chromatid aberrations when compared to controls (2-3-fold over controls) and were not dependent on dose. The results presented here support the link between the radiation-induced phenomena of genomic instability and the bystander effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Ponnaiya
- Radiological Research Facility, Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University, 136 S. Broadway, P.O. Box 21, Irvington, NY 10533, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Our current knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the induction of bystander effects by low dose-low linear-energy-transfer ionising radiation is reviewed, and the question of how bystander effects may be related to observed adaptive responses, systemic genomic instability or other effects of low doses exposures is considered. Bystander effects appear to be the result of a generalised stress response in tissues or cells. The signals may be produced by all exposed cells but the response may require a quoram in order to be expressed. The major response involving low LET radiation exposure discussed in the existing literature is a death response, which has many characteristics of apoptosis but may be detected in cell lines without p53 expression. While a death response might appear to be adverse, it can in fact be protective and remove damaged cells from the population. Since many cell populations carry damaged cells without being exposed to radiation ('background damage') low doses exposures might cause removal of cells damaged by agents other than the test dose of radiation, which would lead to the production of 'u- or n-shaped' dose-response curves. The level of harmful or beneficial response would then be related to the background damage carried by the cell population and the genetic programme determining response to damage. This model may be important when attempting to predict the consequences of mixed exposures involving radiation and other environmental stressors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmel Mothersill
- Medical Physics and Applied Radiation Sciences Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hill MA, Ford JR, Clapham P, Marsden SJ, Stevens DL, Townsend KMS, Goodhead DT. Bound PCNA in nuclei of primary rat tracheal epithelial cells after exposure to very low doses of plutonium-238 alpha particles. Radiat Res 2005; 163:36-44. [PMID: 15606305 DOI: 10.1667/rr3282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Bystander effects from ionizing radiation have been detailed for a number of cell systems and a number of end points. We wished to use a cell culture/ex vivo rat model of respiratory tissue to determine whether a bystander effect detected in culture could also be shown in a tissue. Examination by immunofluorescence techniques of tracheal cell cultures after exposure to very low doses of alpha particles revealed a large proportion of cells with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) bound in their nuclei. PCNA was selected as an end point because it is involved in both DNA repair and the changes in cell cycle that are typical of many reported bystander effects. Maximum response can be detected in up to 28% of the cells in sub-confluent cultures with a dose of only 2 mGy. At this dose less than 2% of the cell nuclei have experienced a particle traversal and less than 6% of the cells have experienced an alpha-particle traversal through either their nucleus or some part of their cytoplasm. The hypothesis that this bystander response in nontargeted cells is mediated through secreted factor(s) is presented, and supporting evidence was found using partial irradiation and co-culture experiments. Examination of the effect with excised pieces of trachea demonstrated a response similar to that seen in culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Hill
- Medical Research Council, Radiation and Genome Stability Unit, Harwell, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RD, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brooks AL. From cell to organism: the need for multiparametric assessment of exposure and biological effects. Br J Radiol 2005. [DOI: 10.1259/bjr/78464782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
22
|
Suzuki M, Zhou H, Geard CR, Hei TK. Effect of Medium on Chromatin Damage in Bystander Mammalian Cells. Radiat Res 2004; 162:264-9. [PMID: 15332998 DOI: 10.1667/rr3226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
In the present study, we examined the potential contribution of irradiated medium to the bystander effect using custom-made double-Mylar stainless steel rings. Exponentially growing human-hamster hybrid (A(L)) cells were plated on either one or both sides of double-Mylar dishes 2-4 days before irradiation. One side (with or without cells) was irradiated with alpha particles using the track segment mode of a 4 MeV Van de Graaff accelerator at the Radiological Research Accelerator Facility of Columbia University. Since alpha particles can traverse only a very limited distance (around 23 microm in water), cells plated on the other side of a medium-filled Mylar dish will not be irradiated by the alpha particles. The results of the cytogenetic assay of unirradiated target cells that were attached to the top Mylar layer indicate that the number of chromatid-type aberrations was higher when there was a bottom layer of cells in the medium-filled chambers than with just medium alone. Furthermore, when the medium was transferred from these cell-irradiated dishes to fresh A(L) cell cultures, chromatid-type aberrations were produced in the unirradiated fresh cells. In contrast, medium irradiated in the absence of cells had no effect on chromatid aberrations. These results suggest that certain unidentified modulating factors secreted from the irradiated cells on the bottom Mylar layer into the medium induce chromatin damage in the unirradiated bystander cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masao Suzuki
- Center for Radiological Research, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brooks AL. Developing a scientific basis for radiation risk estimates: goal of the DOE Low Dose Research Program. HEALTH PHYSICS 2003; 85:85-93. [PMID: 12852475 DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200307000-00016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Energy's Low Dose Radiation Research Program is a 10 y activity currently funded at $21 million per year. It focuses on biological responses to low doses (<0.1 Gy) of low-LET ionizing radiation. The overall goal of this program is to provide a sound scientific basis for the radiation protection standards. The program supports basic research that combines modern genomic, molecular, and cellular techniques with recent advances in scientific instrumentation. These combinations make it possible to detect responses and test paradigms associated with the mechanisms of low dose radiation action not previously measurable or testable. Research to date is briefly reviewed and suggests the need for some major paradigm shifts. Exposure of the extracellular matrix can modify both the pattern of gene expression and the phenotype of the cells which result in cell transformation without direct mutation. Low dose radiation exposure results in a range of dose-response relationships for changes in the number, types, and patterns of gene expression. Such studies suggest an increased role for gene expression relative to single mutations for radiation induced cancer. Low dose research using microbeams demonstrated that cells do not require a direct "hit" to result in significant biological alterations. These "bystander effects" demonstrate that "non-hit" cells respond with changes in gene expression, DNA repair, chromosome aberrations, mutations, and cell killing. Research to link genomic instability with cancer is also being conducted and will be discussed. Detection of radiosensitivity genes as markers of genetic susceptibility in individuals and populations can be used in epidemiological studies to determine how molecular changes may impact risk. It is not possible to determine how this research will influence current radiation standards. However, the Low Dose Research Program will help ensure that radiation standards are set using the best scientific data available, and that they are adequate and appropriate for the protection of workers and the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antone L Brooks
- Washington State University Tri-Cities, 2710 University Drive, Richland, WA 99352, USA.
| |
Collapse
|