1
|
Herbst J, Li QQ, De Veylder L. Mechanistic insights into DNA damage recognition and checkpoint control in plants. NATURE PLANTS 2024; 10:539-550. [PMID: 38503962 DOI: 10.1038/s41477-024-01652-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
The plant DNA damage response (DDR) pathway safeguards genomic integrity by rapid recognition and repair of DNA lesions that, if unrepaired, may cause genome instability. Most frequently, DNA repair goes hand in hand with a transient cell cycle arrest, which allows cells to repair the DNA lesions before engaging in a mitotic event, but consequently also affects plant growth and yield. Through the identification of DDR proteins and cell cycle regulators that react to DNA double-strand breaks or replication defects, it has become clear that these proteins and regulators form highly interconnected networks. These networks operate at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels and include liquid-liquid phase separation and epigenetic mechanisms. Strikingly, whereas the upstream DDR sensors and signalling components are well conserved across eukaryotes, some of the more downstream effectors are diverged in plants, probably to suit unique lifestyle features. Additionally, DDR components display functional diversity across ancient plant species, dicots and monocots. The observed resistance of DDR mutants towards aluminium toxicity, phosphate limitation and seed ageing indicates that gaining knowledge about the plant DDR may offer solutions to combat the effects of climate change and the associated risk for food security.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Herbst
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Gent, Belgium
| | - Qian-Qian Li
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Gent, Belgium
| | - Lieven De Veylder
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Gent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Franek M, Koptašíková L, Mikšátko J, Liebl D, Macíčková E, Pospíšil J, Esner M, Dvořáčková M, Fajkus J. In-section Click-iT detection and super-resolution CLEM analysis of nucleolar ultrastructure and replication in plants. Nat Commun 2024; 15:2445. [PMID: 38503728 PMCID: PMC10950858 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46324-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) is an important tool for the localisation of target molecule(s) and their spatial correlation with the ultrastructural map of subcellular features at the nanometre scale. Adoption of these advanced imaging methods has been limited in plant biology, due to challenges with plant tissue permeability, fluorescence labelling efficiency, indexing of features of interest throughout the complex 3D volume and their re-localization on micrographs of ultrathin cross-sections. Here, we demonstrate an imaging approach based on tissue processing and embedding into methacrylate resin followed by imaging of sections by both, single-molecule localization microscopy and transmission electron microscopy using consecutive CLEM and same-section CLEM correlative workflow. Importantly, we demonstrate that the use of a particular type of embedding resin is not only compatible with single-molecule localization microscopy but shows improvements in the fluorophore blinking behavior relative to the whole-mount approaches. Here, we use a commercially available Click-iT ethynyl-deoxyuridine cell proliferation kit to visualize the DNA replication sites of wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings, as well as fasciata1 and nucleolin1 plants and apply our in-section CLEM imaging workflow for the analysis of S-phase progression and nucleolar organization in mutant plants with aberrant nucleolar phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Franek
- Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | - Lenka Koptašíková
- Charles University, Faculty of Science, Biology Section, Imaging Methods Core Facility at BIOCEV, Průmyslová 595, 252 50, Vestec, Czech Republic
- University of Exeter, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Bioimaging Centre, Geoffrey Pope Building, Stocker Road, EX4 4QD, Exeter, UK
| | - Jíří Mikšátko
- Charles University, Faculty of Science, Biology Section, Imaging Methods Core Facility at BIOCEV, Průmyslová 595, 252 50, Vestec, Czech Republic
| | - David Liebl
- Charles University, Faculty of Science, Biology Section, Imaging Methods Core Facility at BIOCEV, Průmyslová 595, 252 50, Vestec, Czech Republic
| | - Eliška Macíčková
- Charles University, Faculty of Science, Biology Section, Imaging Methods Core Facility at BIOCEV, Průmyslová 595, 252 50, Vestec, Czech Republic
| | - Jakub Pospíšil
- Cellular Imaging Core Facility CELLIM, Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University (CEITEC MU), Kamenice 5, CZ-62500, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Milan Esner
- Cellular Imaging Core Facility CELLIM, Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University (CEITEC MU), Kamenice 5, CZ-62500, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martina Dvořáčková
- Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | - Jíří Fajkus
- Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500, Brno, Czech Republic
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, National Centre for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-61137, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Závodník M, Pavlištová V, Machelová A, Lyčka M, Mozgová I, Caklová K, Dvořáčková M, Fajkus J. KU70 and CAF-1 in Arabidopsis: Divergent roles in rDNA stability and telomere homeostasis. THE PLANT JOURNAL : FOR CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2024. [PMID: 38493352 DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
Deficiency in chromatin assembly factor-1 (CAF-1) in plants through dysfunction of its components, FASCIATA1 and 2 (FAS1, FAS2), leads to the specific and progressive loss of rDNA and telomere repeats in plants. This loss is attributed to defective repair mechanisms for the increased DNA breaks encountered during replication, a consequence of impaired replication-dependent chromatin assembly. In this study, we explore the role of KU70 in these processes. Our findings reveal that, although the rDNA copy number is reduced in ku70 mutants when compared with wild-type plants, it is not markedly affected by diverse KU70 status in fas1 mutants. This is consistent with our previous characterisation of rDNA loss in fas mutants as a consequence part of the single-strand annealing pathway of homology-dependent repair. In stark contrast to rDNA, KU70 dysfunction fully suppresses the loss of telomeres in fas1 plants and converts telomeres to their elongated and heterogeneous state typical for ku70 plants. We conclude that the alternative telomere lengthening pathway, known to be activated in the absence of KU70, overrides progressive telomere loss due to CAF-1 dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Závodník
- Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-62500, Czech Republic
- Department of Cell Biology and Radiobiology, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Brno, CZ-61265, Czech Republic
| | - Veronika Pavlištová
- Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-62500, Czech Republic
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, NCBR, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-61137, Czech Republic
| | - Adéla Machelová
- Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-62500, Czech Republic
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, NCBR, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-61137, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Lyčka
- Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-62500, Czech Republic
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, NCBR, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-61137, Czech Republic
| | - Iva Mozgová
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Karolína Caklová
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, NCBR, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-61137, Czech Republic
| | - Martina Dvořáčková
- Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-62500, Czech Republic
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, NCBR, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-61137, Czech Republic
| | - Jiří Fajkus
- Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-62500, Czech Republic
- Department of Cell Biology and Radiobiology, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Brno, CZ-61265, Czech Republic
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, NCBR, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ-61137, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou Q, Wang Y, Xin C, Wei X, Yao Y, Xia L. Identification of telomere-associated gene signatures to predict prognosis and drug sensitivity in glioma. Comput Biol Med 2024; 168:107750. [PMID: 38029531 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gliomas are a heterogeneous group of brain tumors with distinct biological and clinical properties, leading to significant mortality and morbidity. Emerging evidence shows telomere maintenance has implicated in glioma susceptibility and prognosis. In this study, we comprehensively analyzed gene signatures related to telomere maintenance in glioma and their predictive values for predicting the prognosis and drug sensitivity in glioma. METHODS We initially identified telomere-related genes differentially expressed between low-grade glioma (LGG) and glioblastoma (GBM) and accordingly developed a risk model by univariate and multivariate Cox analysis to assess the expressions of telomere-related genes across the risk groups. Finally, to assess these genes in immune function the anti-tumor medications often used in the clinical treatment of glioma, we computed immune cell infiltration analysis and drug sensitivity analysis. RESULTS The consensus clustering analysis identified 20 telomere-related genes which split LGG patients into two distinct subtypes. The patient survival, the expressions of key telomere-related DEGs, and immune cell infiltration significantly differed between Cluster 1 and Cluster 2. The LASSO risk model [riskScore=(0.086)*HOXA7+(0.242)*WEE1+(0.247)*IGF2BP3+(0.052)*DUSP10] showed significant differences regarding the 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival, immune cell infiltration, and drug sensitivity between high- and low-risk groups. The predictive nomogram constructed to quantify the survival probability of each sample at 1, 3, and 5 years was consistent with the actual patient survival. CONCLUSION Our comprehensive characterization of telomere-associated gene signatures in glioma reveals their possible roles in the development, tumor microenvironment, and prognosis. The study provides some suggestive relationships between four telomere-related genes (HOXA7, WEE1, IGF2BP3, and DUSP10) and glioma prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingqing Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou First People's Hospital, Jingzhou, 434000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yamei Wang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou First People's Hospital, Jingzhou, 434000, People's Republic of China
| | - Chenqi Xin
- Department of Scientific Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou First People's Hospital, Jingzhou, 434000, People's Republic of China
| | - XiaoMing Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou First People's Hospital, Jingzhou, 434000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Yao
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou First People's Hospital, Jingzhou, 434000, People's Republic of China.
| | - Liang Xia
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen H, Pan T, Zheng X, Huang Y, Wu C, Yang T, Gao S, Wang L, Yan S. The ATR-WEE1 kinase module promotes SUPPRESSOR OF GAMMA RESPONSE 1 translation to activate replication stress responses. THE PLANT CELL 2023; 35:3021-3034. [PMID: 37159556 PMCID: PMC10396359 DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koad126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
DNA replication stress threatens genome stability and is a hallmark of cancer in humans. The evolutionarily conserved kinases ATR (ATM and RAD3-related) and WEE1 are essential for the activation of replication stress responses. Translational control is an important mechanism that regulates gene expression, but its role in replication stress responses is largely unknown. Here we show that ATR-WEE1 control the translation of SUPPRESSOR OF GAMMA RESPONSE 1 (SOG1), a master transcription factor required for replication stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Through genetic screening, we found that the loss of GENERAL CONTROL NONDEREPRESSIBLE 20 (GCN20) or GCN1, which function together to inhibit protein translation, suppressed the hypersensitivity of the atr or wee1 mutant to replication stress. Biochemically, WEE1 inhibits GCN20 by phosphorylating it; phosphorylated GCN20 is subsequently polyubiquitinated and degraded. Ribosome profiling experiments revealed that that loss of GCN20 enhanced the translation efficiency of SOG1, while overexpressing GCN20 had the opposite effect. The loss of SOG1 reduced the resistance of wee1 gcn20 to replication stress, whereas overexpressing SOG1 enhanced the resistance to atr or wee1 to replication stress. These results suggest that ATR-WEE1 inhibits GCN20-GCN1 activity to promote the translation of SOG1 during replication stress. These findings link translational control to replication stress responses in Arabidopsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanchen Chen
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
- College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Ting Pan
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
- College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Xueao Zheng
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
- College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Yongchi Huang
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
- College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Chong Wu
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
- College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Tongbin Yang
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
- College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Shan Gao
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
- College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Lili Wang
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
- College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Shunping Yan
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
- College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bao W, Zhang W, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Wu C, Duan L, Wang L, Yan S. Protein kinase ATR inhibits E3 ubiquitin ligase CRL4 PRL1 to stabilize ribonucleotide reductase in response to replication stress. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112685. [PMID: 37354461 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The protein kinase ATR is essential for replication stress responses in all eukaryotes. Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) catalyzes the formation of deoxyribonucleotide (dNTP), the universal building block for DNA replication and repair. However, the relationship between ATR and RNR is not well understood. Here, we show that ATR promotes the protein stability of RNR in Arabidopsis. Through an activation tagging-based genetic screen, we found that overexpression of TSO2, a small subunit of RNR, partially suppresses the hypersensitivity of the atr mutant to replication stress. Biochemically, TSO2 interacts with PRL1, a central subunit of the Cullin4-based E3 ubiquitin ligase CRL4PRL1, which polyubiquitinates TSO2 and promotes its degradation. ATR inhibits CRL4PRL1 to attenuate TSO2 degradation. Our work provides an important insight into the replication stress responses and a post-translational regulatory mechanism for RNR. Given the evolutionary conservation of the proteins involved, the ATR-PRL1-RNR module may act across eukaryotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiyi Bao
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China; Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Weijia Zhang
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China; Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Yongchi Huang
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China; Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Yan Zhao
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China; Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Cong Wu
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China; Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Leilei Duan
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China; Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Lili Wang
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China; Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China.
| | - Shunping Yan
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Shenzhen 518000, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518000, China; Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pedroza-Garcia JA, Xiang Y, De Veylder L. Cell cycle checkpoint control in response to DNA damage by environmental stresses. THE PLANT JOURNAL : FOR CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2022; 109:490-507. [PMID: 34741364 DOI: 10.1111/tpj.15567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Being sessile organisms, plants are ubiquitously exposed to stresses that can affect the DNA replication process or cause DNA damage. To cope with these problems, plants utilize DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, consisting of both highly conserved and plant-specific elements. As a part of this DDR, cell cycle checkpoint control mechanisms either pause the cell cycle, to allow DNA repair, or lead cells into differentiation or programmed cell death, to prevent the transmission of DNA errors in the organism through mitosis or to its offspring via meiosis. The two major DDR cell cycle checkpoints control either the replication process or the G2/M transition. The latter is largely overseen by the plant-specific SOG1 transcription factor, which drives the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors and MYB3R proteins, which are rate limiting for the G2/M transition. By contrast, the replication checkpoint is controlled by different players, including the conserved kinase WEE1 and likely the transcriptional repressor RBR1. These checkpoint mechanisms are called upon during developmental processes, in retrograde signaling pathways, and in response to biotic and abiotic stresses, including metal toxicity, cold, salinity, and phosphate deficiency. Additionally, the recent expansion of research from Arabidopsis to other model plants has revealed species-specific aspects of the DDR. Overall, it is becoming evidently clear that the DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms represent an important aspect of the adaptation of plants to a changing environment, hence gaining more knowledge about this topic might be helpful to increase the resilience of plants to climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Antonio Pedroza-Garcia
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium
| | - Yanli Xiang
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium
| | - Lieven De Veylder
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Desvoyes B, Echevarría C, Gutierrez C. A perspective on cell proliferation kinetics in the root apical meristem. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY 2021; 72:6708-6715. [PMID: 34159378 PMCID: PMC8513163 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erab303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Organogenesis in plants is primarily postembryonic and relies on a strict balance between cell division and cell expansion. The root is a particularly well-suited model to study cell proliferation in detail since the two processes are spatially and temporally separated for all the different tissues. In addition, the root is amenable to detailed microscopic analysis to identify cells progressing through the cell cycle. While it is clear that cell proliferation activity is restricted to the root apical meristem (RAM), understanding cell proliferation kinetics and identifying its parameters have required much effort over many years. Here, we review the main concepts, experimental settings, and findings aimed at obtaining a detailed knowledge of how cells proliferate within the RAM. The combination of novel tools, experimental strategies, and mathematical models has contributed to our current view of cell proliferation in the RAM. We also discuss several lines of research that need to be explored in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bénédicte Desvoyes
- Centro de Biologia Molecular Severo Ochoa, CSIC-UAM, Nicolas Cabrera 1, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Clara Echevarría
- Centro de Biologia Molecular Severo Ochoa, CSIC-UAM, Nicolas Cabrera 1, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Crisanto Gutierrez
- Centro de Biologia Molecular Severo Ochoa, CSIC-UAM, Nicolas Cabrera 1, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eekhout T, Pedroza-Garcia JA, Kalhorzadeh P, De Jaeger G, De Veylder L. A Mutation in DNA Polymerase α Rescues WEE1KO Sensitivity to HU. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:9409. [PMID: 34502313 PMCID: PMC8430855 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22179409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
During DNA replication, the WEE1 kinase is responsible for safeguarding genomic integrity by phosphorylating and thus inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which are the driving force of the cell cycle. Consequentially, wee1 mutant plants fail to respond properly to problems arising during DNA replication and are hypersensitive to replication stress. Here, we report the identification of the polα-2 mutant, mutated in the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase α, as a suppressor mutant of wee1. The mutated protein appears to be less stable, causing a loss of interaction with its subunits and resulting in a prolonged S-phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Eekhout
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Gent, Belgium; (T.E.); (J.A.P.-G.); (P.K.); (G.D.J.)
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, 9052 Gent, Belgium
| | - José Antonio Pedroza-Garcia
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Gent, Belgium; (T.E.); (J.A.P.-G.); (P.K.); (G.D.J.)
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, 9052 Gent, Belgium
| | - Pooneh Kalhorzadeh
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Gent, Belgium; (T.E.); (J.A.P.-G.); (P.K.); (G.D.J.)
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, 9052 Gent, Belgium
| | - Geert De Jaeger
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Gent, Belgium; (T.E.); (J.A.P.-G.); (P.K.); (G.D.J.)
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, 9052 Gent, Belgium
| | - Lieven De Veylder
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Gent, Belgium; (T.E.); (J.A.P.-G.); (P.K.); (G.D.J.)
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, 9052 Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tulin F. Buying time: FASCIATA1 deficiency rescues wee1 plants from replication stress by delaying mitosis. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 2021; 186:1762-1764. [PMID: 34618115 PMCID: PMC8331142 DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Frej Tulin
- Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Plant Science Department, Botany, Technische Universität München, 85354 Freising, Germany
| |
Collapse
|