Progressive Response to Repeat Application of Capsaicin 179 mg (8% w/w) Cutaneous Patch in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Comprehensive New Analysis and Clinical Implications

CASPAR: a retrospective cohort study of the high-concentration capsaicin topical system in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the feet

INTRODUCTION

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), a common complication of diabetes, is challenging to treat and negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). Many patients either fail to achieve adequate pain relief with current treatments or suffer from systemic side effects with oral options. This study used data from the German Pain e-Registry (GPeR) to evaluate the high-concentration capsaicin topical system (HCCTS) for treating pDPN of the feet.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective, non-interventional cohort study (CASPAR) included patients with pDPN of the feet who received ≥1 HCCTS treatment (~3-month treatment intervals) and contributed data to the GPeR for ≥12 months. Data were collected on pain intensity, QoL, sleep, mood, concomitant medication, and tolerability.

RESULTS

Overall, 365 patients with pDPN of the feet were included. Significant reductions in 24-hour average pain intensity (API) were observed from baseline to month 3 (following one HCCTS treatment). Further reductions in mean API score were seen over 12 months with ongoing treatments, whereas API increased in patients who discontinued treatment (baseline to month 12 mean API scores: 61.4 to 8.8 for four HCCTS [∆ -52.6], 59.3 to 16.7 for three HCCTS [∆ -42.6], 56.3 to 31.9 for two HCCTS [∆ -24.4], 57.5 to 51.4 for one HCCTS [∆ -6.1]). Similar trends were seen for sleep, mood, and QoL outcomes. There was a significant reduction in concomitant pain medication use in patients receiving ongoing HCCTS treatments. The most common adverse events were local application-site reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study in patients with pDPN of the feet demonstrates that ongoing HCCTS treatments continue to improve pain intensity, mood, and QoL, while concomitant medication use decreases. Benefits from treatment were lost following HCCTS discontinuation. These findings emphasize the importance of ongoing treatments to achieve the potential of HCCTS in improving outcomes for patients with pDPN.

Efficacy and safety of capsaicin 8% patches: The experience of a rheumatology department

Background

Capsaicin 8% patches are recommended for the treatment of localized neuropathic pain, which is a frequent reason for rheumatology consultations.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capsaicin 8% used in our Rheumatology Department.

Design

Single-center retrospective study.

Methods

Patients treated by capsaicin 8% between October 03, 2019 and December 31, 2023 were included. Their age, sex, pain duration, DN4 score, pain intensity, and the cause of the neuropathic pain were collected. Patch safety was assessed on the day of application and after 15 days. The patient was asked about improvement, pain intensity, and the occurrence of burning sensations.

Results

One hundred twelve patients (mean age 62, 70% female) were included. The causes of neuropathic pain were especially scar (n = 31), digital osteoarthritis (n = 26), or radiculalgia (n = 22). Sixty patients reported improvement (54%) at day 15, with a mean percentage of improvement of 59%. Mean pain intensity decreased from 6.4 ± 1.9 to 4.5 ± 2.7 (p < 0.001). This improvement in pain was significant regardless of etiology. There was no difference in age, sex, and pain duration between improved and unimproved patients. Fifty-eight patients (58/106: 54.7%) experienced burning sensations after patching, mainly of moderate to high intensity (32/52: 61.5%), with an average duration of 2 days. Of the eight unimproved after the first patch, six reported a 50% improvement after the second patch.

Conclusion

Capsaicin 8% appeared to be an effective treatment in localized neuropathic pain, whatever the cause. It seemed beneficial to repeat the application after the 1st one had failed. Burning sensations after placement were fairly frequent, usually moderate to high, but lasting only a short time.

Narrative review of the efficacy and safety of the high-concentration (179mg) capsaicin patch in peripheral neuropathic pain with recommendations for clinical practice and future research

High-concentration capsaicin patch (HC capsaicin patch) is a locally acting treatment option for adults with peripheral neuropathic pain (pNeP) of various etiologies. Numerous clinical trials, post hoc analyses, and meta-analyses have investigated the efficacy and tolerability of the HC capsaicin patch. Despite this extensive body of research, a comprehensive narrative review covering publications on different pNeP conditions is lacking. This narrative review aims to fill the gap by analyzing 52 studies, including randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence. The results show that the HC capsaicin patch consistently provides pain relief and improves quality of life for several pNeP conditions, with increasing benefits seen with repeated treatments. It was found to be superior to placebo and comparable to standard care, regardless of the origin of the pain. Early initiation of therapy appears to improve efficacy, although patients with more prolonged pain also benefit. While the exact mechanisms of action are still unclear, there is evidence to suggest a potential benefit from nerve regeneration in some conditions. However, limited information exists regarding the alteration of treatment intervals and the variation in the size of the painful area upon re-treatment. The review also identifies variability in response rates for different types of pNeP and a lack of reliable predictors of treatment success, indicating a need for further research. In conclusion, the HC capsaicin patch is effective and well tolerated across a range of pNeP conditions, with increasing efficacy upon retreatment. It is a valuable treatment option, although more research is needed to refine its clinical use and explore its full therapeutic potential.

A Review of Nonsurgical Neurolytic Procedures for Neuropathic Pain

Introduction

Ideally, a physical or chemical nonsurgical neurolytic procedure provides targeted neurolysis to relieve pain for a suitable length of time without causing complications. This narrative review focuses on five nonsurgical neurolytic procedures that are well-established and well-documented in the literature for the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain and peripheral neuropathies, in particular: two physical nonsurgical neurolytic techniques (cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation) and three chemoneurolytic agents (alcohol injection, phenol injection, and a high-concentration capsaicin 8% topical system).

Methods

Using the definition of nonsurgical physical and chemical neurolytic procedures for neuropathic pain, a focused literature search of the PubMed database for English-language, human studies published through July 2024 included, but was not limited to, the following search terms: "neuropathic pain" AND "cryoablation", "cryoneurolysis", "radiofrequency ablation", "alcohol neurolysis", "alcohol injection", "phenol neurolysis", "phenol injection", "chemoneurolysis", "topical capsaicin", and "TRPV1." While attempts were made to identify prospective clinical trials for each type of neurolytic procedure, information regarding the conduct and safety and efficacy of some of these nonsurgical neurolytic procedures was primarily limited to case studies and anecdotal evidence.

Results

The risk benefit basis of each technique is discussed, and recommendations for proper use based on the literature are summarized. Most techniques require ultrasound or fluoroscopy guidance. Pain relief typically ranges from 3 to 12 months, with repeat neurolytic procedures often required to maintain suitable levels of pain relief.

Conclusion

The authors provide their insights as to the best utilization of these identified nonsurgical physical and chemoneurolytic procedures for the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain in different patient populations based on neural targets. Together, these five nonsurgical neurolytic techniques provide patients and physicians with a variety of options for the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain.

Is there a role for capsaicin in cancer pain management?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in oncological therapies have resulted in an increase in the number of patients living with and beyond cancer. The personal and societal impact of chronic pain in the survivor population represents an area of significant unmet need. Capsaicin (a TRPV1 agonist) may provide analgesia with limited systemic side effects. This review looks to summarise the most recent evidence regarding the use of capsaicin in the management of cancer pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Various international guidelines have recently endorsed the use of high concentration capsaicin patches in the treatment of chronic painful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy. Numerous studies support the use of capsaicin in the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. This promising data is predominantly yielded from pain secondary to herpes zoster and diabetic neuropathy, with an expanding but small evidence base for its utility in other neuropathic pains. Emerging data suggests that treatments are better tolerated and provide analgesia more rapidly when compared with systemic treatments.

SUMMARY

Whilst randomised controlled trial data in the treatment of cancer pain are lacking, recent large cohort studies, and international guidelines, support the use of high concentration capsaicin patches in a wide variety of neuropathic pain secondary to cancer treatments.

Vascular and nerve biomarkers in thigh skin biopsies differentiate painful from painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Background

Identifying distinct mechanisms and biomarkers for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is required for advancing the treatment of this major global unmet clinical need. We previously provided evidence in calf skin biopsies that disproportion between reduced sensory small nerve fibers and increased blood vessels may distinguish painful from non-painful DPN. We proposed that overexposure of the reduced nerve fibers in DPN to increased hypoxemia-induced vasculature and related algogenic factors, e.g., nerve growth factor (NGF), leads to neuropathic pain. To further investigate this proposed mechanism, we have now studied more proximal thigh skin biopsies, to see if the same disproportion between increased vasculature and decreased nerve fibers generally differentiates painful DPN from painless DPN.

Methods

A total of 28 subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and 13 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent detailed clinical and neurophysiological assessments, based on the neuropathy composite score of the lower limbs [NIS(LL)] plus 7 tests. T2DM subjects were subsequently divided into three groups: painful DPN (n = 15), painless DPN (n = 7), and no DPN (n = 6). All subjects underwent skin punch biopsy from the upper lateral thigh 20 cm below the anterior iliac spine.

Results

Skin biopsies showed decreased PGP 9.5-positive intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density in both painful DPN (p < 0.0001) and painless DPN (p = 0.001). Vascular marker von Willebrand Factor (vWF) density was markedly increased in painful DPN vs. other groups, including painless DPN (p = 0.01). There was a resulting significant decrease in the ratio of intraepidermal nerve fiber density to vasculature and PGP9.5 to vWF, in painful DPN vs. painless DPN (p = 0.05). These results were similar in pattern to those observed in these HV and T2DM groups previously in distal calf biopsies; however, the increase in vWF was much higher and nerve fiber density much lower in the calf than thigh for painful DPN. Thigh skin vWF density was significantly correlated with several metabolic (waist/hip ratio, HbA1c), clinical (e.g., pain score), and neurophysiological measures.

Conclusion

This study supports our proposal that increased dermal vasculature, and its disproportionate ratio to reduced nociceptors, may help differentiate painful DPN from painless DPN. This disproportion is greater in the distal calf than the proximal thigh skin; hence, neuropathic pain in DPN is length-dependent and first localized to the distal lower limbs, mainly feet.

Targeting the TRPV1 pain pathway in osteoarthritis of the knee

INTRODUCTION

The growing prevalence and lack of effective pain therapies for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) results in a substantial unmet need for novel analgesic therapies. The transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) receptor is expressed in subsets of nociceptive sensory neurons and has major roles in pain transmission and regulation. In the structures of the knee joint, nociceptors are present in abundance.

AREAS COVERED

TRPV1-expressing nociceptors in the knee represent a rational target to modulate activity at the origin of the pain pathway in KOA and may avoid systemic side effects seen with currently available analgesics. TRPV1 antagonists can induce analgesia, but hyperthermia and thermal hypesthesia side effects have limited their utility. Clinical development of TRPV1 agonists for pain management has progressed further than that of TRPV1 antagonists. Capsaicin and resiniferatoxin have provided proof-of-concept for the modulation of TRPV1 activity in KOA.

EXPERT OPINION

Intra-articular administration of TRPV1 agonists enables direct delivery to target nerve terminals in the knee, offering a potentially transformative approach for the management of pain associated with KOA. Here, we explore the advances in understanding innervation of the knee joint in KOA, the role of TRPV1-expressing neurons and progress in developing TRPV1 modulators for KOA.

Topical treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) with high-concentration (179 mg) capsaicin patch in breast cancer patients - results of the QUCIP study

Background

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) following oral or intravenous chemotherapy often results in neuropathic pain, accompanied by symptoms such tingling, burning and hypersensitivity to stimuli, with a notable decline in quality of life (QoL). Effective therapies for CIPN are lacking, with a high demand for analgesics to address this issue. The QUCIP study aimed to assess the effectiveness of high concentration (179 mg) capsaicin patch (HCCP) in alleviating neuropathic pain and associated symptoms in breast cancer patients with confirmed CIPN.

Methods

QUCIP is a prospective, multi-center observational study spanning 36 weeks with up to three HCCP treatments. Initial treatment (visit V0) was followed by two telephone contacts (T1, T2) and subsequent face-to-face visits every 12 weeks or upon retreatment (visits V1-V3). 73 female patients with painful CIPN post neoadjuvant/adjuvant breast cancer therapy were enrolled. Primary endpoint was the reduction of neuropathic pain symptom score (painDETECT®). Secondary endpoints included improvements in CIPN-specific QoL (QLQ-CIPN20), reductions in pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale, NPRS), and achievement of ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% pain reduction.

Results

Median age was 61 years, with 52.0% of patients experiencing peripheral neuropathic pain for > 1 year (> 2 years: 34.2%). The painDETECT® score significantly decreased from baseline (19.71 ± 4.69) to 15.80 ± 6.20 after initial treatment (p < 0.0001) and continued to decrease at follow-up visits. The NPRS indicated significant pain intensity reduction at each time point, particularly pronounced in patients receiving three HCCP treatments. Clinically significant pain relief of ≥ 30% increased from 25.0% at week 4 (T2) to 36.2%, 43.5%, and 40.0% at weeks 12 (V1), 24 (V2), and 36 (V3), respectively. The percentage of patients achieving pain relief of ≥ 50% increased from 14.7% at T2 to 15.5%, 21.7% and 32.5% at V1, V2 and V3, respectively. Patients further reported a significant improvement in their CIPN-related QoL throughout the study. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) mainly included application site reactions.

Conclusion

In this study, HCCP shows benefit in managing CIPN in real-world settings. The data demonstrate a sustained and progressive reduction in neuropathic pain and symptomatology, confirming the clinical benefit of repeated treatment observed in former clinical trials. HCCP treatment has also the potential to significantly improve the QoL associated with CIPN. The safety profile of HCCP was confirmed, supporting its use in clinical practice.

Characteristics and outcomes of peripheral neuropathic pain patients with repeated applications of high-concentration capsaicin cutaneous patch: Results of a retrospective chart review in Germany

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient characteristics, concomitant analgesic medication, and pain intensity in a real-world setting in Germany, focusing on the repeated application of high-concentration capsaicin patch (HCCP) for neuropathic pain.

DESIGN

Data were collected from electronic medical records of patients who received at least two HCCP treatments between January 2011 and July 2022. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the number of HCCP treatments, age groups, and specific neuropathic pain conditions.

SETTING

The study was conducted at an outpatient pain center in Wiesbaden, Germany.

SUBJECTS

The study included 97 patients, primarily diagnosed with neuropathic back pain, postoperative or post-traumatic neuropathic pain, and postherpetic neuralgia.

METHODS

The daily dose of concomitant medications (eg, opioids and anticonvulsants) at the start of capsaicin therapy was compared with the average within 2 years of capsaicin therapy. The last observation carried forward method was used if HCCP treatment was discontinued before the end of the 2-year period.

RESULTS

The majority of patients received concomitant medications, with opioids, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants being the most common. The average daily morphine equivalent dose decreased significantly during HCCP treatment. Pain intensity at baseline was generally high, but substantial improvements were observed in patients who received at least three HCCP applications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of HCCP treatment in reducing pain intensity and concomitant opioid use in patients with neuropathic pain. Further research is needed to explore the long-term outcomes and optimal treatment regimens for different patient populations.

Targeting TRP channels for pain relief: A review of current evidence from bench to bedside

Several decades of research support the involvement of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels in nociception. Despite the disappointments of early TRPV1 antagonist programs, the TRP family remains a promising therapeutic target in pain disorders. High-dose capsaicin patches are already in clinical use to relieve neuropathic pain. At present, localized injections of the side-directed TRPV1 agonist capsaicin and resiniferatoxin are undergoing clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis and bone cancer pain. TRPA1, TRPM3, and TRPC5 channels are also of significant interest. This review discusses the role of TRP channels in human pain conditions.

Update on Treating Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review of Current US Guidelines with a Focus on the Most Recently Approved Management Options

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a highly prevalent and disabling complication of diabetes that is often misdiagnosed and undertreated. The management of painful DPN involves treating its underlying cause via lifestyle modifications and intensive glucose control, targeting its pathogenesis, and providing symptomatic pain relief, thereby improving patient function and health-related quality of life. Four pharmacologic options are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat painful DPN. These include three oral medications (duloxetine, pregabalin, and tapentadol extended release) and one topical agent (capsaicin 8% topical system). More recently, the FDA approved several spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices to treat refractory painful DPN. Although not FDA-approved specifically to treat painful DPN, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, gabapentinoids, and sodium channel blockers are common first-line oral options in clinical practice. Other strategies may be used as part of individualized comprehensive pain management plans. This article provides an overview of the most recent US guidelines for managing painful DPN, with a focus on the two most recently approved treatment options (SCS and capsaicin 8% topical system), as well as evidence for using FDA-approved and guideline-supported drugs and devices. Also discussed are unmet needs for this patient population, and evidence for potential future treatments for painful DPN, including drugs with novel mechanisms of action, electrical stimulation devices, and nutraceuticals.

4. Painful diabetic polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Pain as a symptom of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) significantly lowers quality of life, increases mortality and is the main reason for patients with diabetes to seek medical attention. The number of people suffering from painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN) has increased significantly over the past decades.

METHODS

The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy was retrieved and summarized.

RESULTS

The etiology of PDPN is complex, with primary damage to peripheral nociceptors and altered spinal and supra-spinal modulation. To achieve better patient outcomes, the mode of diagnosis and treatment of PDPN evolves toward more precise pain-phenotyping and genotyping based on patient-specific characteristics, new diagnostic tools, and prior response to pharmacological treatments. According to the Toronto Diabetic Neuropathy Expert Group, a presumptive diagnosis of "probable PDPN" is sufficient to initiate treatment. Proper control of plasma glucose levels, and prevention of risk factors are essential in the treatment of PDPN. Mechanism-based pharmacological treatment should be initiated as early as possible. If symptomatic pharmacologic treatment fails, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) should be considered. In isolated cases, where symptomatic pharmacologic treatment and SCS are unsuccessful or cannot be used, sympathetic lumbar chain neurolysis and/or radiofrequency ablation (SLCN/SLCRF), dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGs) or posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) may be considered. However, it is recommended that these treatments be applied only in a study setting in a center of expertise.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of PDPN evolves toward pheno-and genotyping and treatment should be mechanism-based.

Conventional management and current guidelines for painful diabetic neuropathy

Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDN) is common, affecting around a quarter of patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and can lead to significant curtailment of functionality and quality of life. Patients may present with unremitting burning, aching or "electric-shock" type pains in their feet, legs and later, in the hands. Conventional management approaches must focus not only on pain relief, but also on concurrent sleep problems, mood disorders and functionality. The mainstay of treatment is pharmacotherapy. Most current international guidelines recommend a choice of four drugs: amitriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin or gabapentin, as initial treatment for PDN. Recent evidence from the OPTION-DM trial demonstrated that these drugs and their combinations have equivalent efficacy. Moreover, combination treatment provided significant pain relief to patients with inadequate response to the maximum tolerated dose of monotherapy. PDN refractory to pharmacotherapy can be treated with capsaicin 8% or high frequency spinal cord stimulation.

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the feet: integrating prescription-strength capsaicin into office procedures

Prescription-strength (8%) capsaicin topical system is a US FDA-approved treatment for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the feet. A 30 min application of the capsaicin 8% topical system can provide sustained (up to 3 months) local pain relief by desensitizing and reducing TRPV1-expressing cutaneous fibers. Capsaicin is not absorbed systemically; despite associated application-site discomfort, capsaicin 8% topical system is well tolerated, with no known drug interactions or contraindications, and could offer clinical advantages over oral options. Capsaicin 8% topical system are not for patient self-administration and require incorporation into office procedures, with the added benefit of treatment compliance. This article reviews existing literature and provides comprehensive, practical information regarding the integration of capsaicin 8% topical systems into office procedures.

Issues and challenges in diabetic neuropathy management: A narrative review

Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a devastating disorder with an increasing prevalence globally. This epidemic can pose a critical burden on individuals and com-munities, subsequently affecting the productivity and economic output of a country. With more people living a sedentary lifestyle, the incidence of DN is escalating worldwide. Many researchers have relentlessly worked on ways to combat this devastating disease. Their efforts have given rise to a number of commercially available therapies that can alleviate the symptoms of DN. Unfortunately, most of these therapies are only partially effective. Worse still, some are associated with unfavorable side effects. This narrative review aims to highlight current issues and challenges in the management of DN, especially from the perspective of molecular mechanisms that lead to its progression, with the hope of providing future direction in the management of DN. To improve the approaches to diabetic management, the suggested resolutions in the literature are also discussed in this review. This review will provide an in-depth understanding of the causative mechanisms of DN, apart from the insights to improve the quality and strategic approaches to DN management.

Capsaicin treatment in neuropathic pain: axon reflex vasodilatation after 4 weeks correlates with pain reduction

ABSTRACT

Capsaicin, an agonist at the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1, is used for the topical treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. Reversible receptor defunctionalization and degeneration and subsequent regeneration of cutaneous nociceptors are discussed as its mechanism of action. Here, we hypothesize an accelerated functional recovery of a subclass of nociceptive afferents, the peptidergic vasoactive nociceptors, as the potential cause of capsaicin analgesia. In this noninterventional exploratory trial, 23 patients with peripheral neuropathic pain were treated with one topical high-concentration capsaicin application. Baseline pain ratings, comorbidities, and quality of life were assessed. Functional laser speckle contrast analysis (heat-evoked neurogenic vasodilatation to assess functional properties of peptidergic nociceptors) and quantitative sensory testing were performed in the affected skin. Four weeks after treatment, functional laser speckle contrast analysis and questionnaires were repeated. Telephone interviews were conducted at weeks 2, 10, and 12. Topical capsaicin treatment induced a significant reduction in pain intensity with a maximum at 4 weeks. At the same time, heat-evoked neurogenic vasodilatation was on average similar to pretreatment values. Half of the patients not only showed a functional recovery but also an improvement in vasodilatation, indicating regeneration of nerve fibers. Patients with improved heat-evoked neurogenic vasodilatation at week 4 showed a greater pain reduction than those with deterioration. The degree of vasodilatation significantly correlated with pain reduction. These findings suggest that (1) regeneration of peptidergic nociceptors may be the mechanism behind capsaicin-induced analgesia and (2) that a disease-modifying effect of capsaicin on these fibers already occurs 4 weeks after application.

Evaluation of 8% Capsaicin Patches in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Retrospective Study in a Comprehensive Cancer Center

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is often painful and can arise during or after the end of oncological treatments. They are mostly induced by platinum salts, taxanes, and immunotherapies. Their incidence is estimated between 19 and 85%. They can require a chemotherapy dose reduction or early termination. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) recommends high-concentration capsaicin patch (HCCP) in second line for the treatment of painful CIPN. This treatment induces a significative pain relief but only shown by low-powered studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of HCCP applications in CIPN. Methods: This monocentric observational retrospective real-world-data study of the CERCAN cohort took place in the Western Cancer Institute's Anaesthesiology and Pain Department at Angers, France. Independent pain physicians completed the CGIC (Clinician Global Impression of Change) for each patient who benefited from HCCP applications for painful CIPN starting from 1 January 2014 to 22 December 2021, based on the collected data after every patch application. Results: A total of 57 patients (80.7% women) was treated with HCCP for painful CIPN, and 184 applications were realized, consisting of 296 sessions. CGIC found an important or complete pain relief for 61 applications (33.2%, corresponding to 43.9% patients). We found less efficacy for platinum-salts-induced CIPN compared to others (p = 0.0238). The efficacy was significatively higher for repeated applications when HCCP was used in second line compared to third line (p = 0.018). The efficacy of HCCP was significatively higher starting the third application (p = 0.0334). HCCPs were mainly responsible for local adverse events found in 66.6% patients (65.1% burning or painful sensation, 21.1% erythema). Conclusion: HCCP applications in painful CIPN induce an important pain relief with a global satisfying tolerability.

Capsaicin 8% Patch for Spinal Cord Injury Focal Neuropathic Pain, a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain (NP) after spinal cord injury (SCI) exacerbates disability, decreases quality of life (QOL), and is often refractory to available therapies. Patients report willingness to trade potential recovery of strength, bowel, bladder, or sexual function for pain relief. One proposed mechanism causing NP is up-regulation of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV 1) proteins in uninjured C fibers and dorsal root ganglia causing neuronal excitability. Recent studies have found up-regulation of TRPV 1 proteins after SCI.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize the application of capsaicin 8% patch (C8P), FDA approved for NP in diabetic peripheral neuropathy and post-herpetic neuralgia, will improve pain, function and QOL in persons with SCI.

METHODS

Randomized single-blind crossover design in which 11 persons with SCI and NP refractory to two oral pain medications received C8P or a control low dose Capsaicin 0.025% patch (CON) over two 12-week periods. Pain (VAS, MPI-SCI), quality of life (WHO-QOL), and functional status (SCIM) were measured at 2-4-week intervals.

RESULTS

There was a main treatment effect of C8P over CON on VAS and MPI-SCI outcomes with pain reduction of 35% and 29% at weeks 2 and 4, respectively. C8P also demonstrated a main treatment effect over CON on the SCIM mobility subscale. WHO-QOL scores did not improve with C8P.

CONCLUSIONS

C8P improves pain and mobility for patients with SCI and refractory NP. Larger studies should be performed to evaluate impact of repeat applications and QOL outcomes.

Reversing painful and non-painful diabetic neuropathy with the capsaicin 8% patch: Clinical evidence for pain relief and restoration of function via nerve fiber regeneration

Introduction

Current oral treatments for pain in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) do not affect the progression of DPN i.e., "disease modification." We assessed whether Capsaicin 8% patch treatment can provide pain relief and also restore nerve density and function via nerve regeneration, in both painful (PDPN) and non-painful (NPDPN) diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Methods

50 participants with PDPN were randomized to receive Capsaicin 8% patch Qutenza with Standard of Care (SOC) (PDPN Q+SOC group), or SOC alone (PDPN SOC group). Pain symptoms were assessed with a diary (Numerical Pain Rating Scale, NRPS) and questionnaires. Investigations included quantitative sensory testing (QST) and distal calf skin biopsies, at baseline and 3 months after baseline visit; subsequent options were 3-monthly visits over 1 year. 25 participants with NPDPN had tests at baseline, and 3 months after all received Capsaicin 8% patch treatment.

Results

At 3 months after baseline, PDPN Q+SOC group had reduction in NPRS score (p = 0.0001), but not PDPN SOC group. Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) showed significant reductions in scores for overall and other pain descriptors only in the PDPN Q+SOC group. Warm perception thresholds were significantly improved only in the PDPN Q+SOC group (p = 0.02), and correlated with reduction in SF-MPQ overall pain score (p = 0.04). NPDPN Q+SOC group did not report pain during the entire study. Density of intra-epidermal nerve fibers (IENF) with PGP9.5 was increased at 3 months in PDPN Q+SOC (p = 0.0002) and NPDPN Q+SOC (p = 0.002) groups, but not in the PDPN SOC group. Increased sub-epidermal nerve fibers (SENF) were observed with GAP43 (marker of regenerating nerve fibers) only in PDPN Q+SOC (p = 0.003) and NPDPN Q+SOC (p = 0.0005) groups. Pain relief in the PDPN Q+SOC group was correlated with the increased PGP9.5 IENF (p = 0.0008) and GAP43 (p = 0.004), whereas those with lack of pain relief showed no such increase; in some subjects pain relief and increased nerve fibers persisted over months. PGP9.5 IENF increase correlated with axon-reflex vasodilatation in a NPDPN Q+SOC subset (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Capsaicin 8% patch can provide pain relief via nerve regeneration and restoration of function in DPN (disease modification). It may thereby potentially prevent diabetic foot complications, including ulcers.

Prevention and Management Strategies for Diabetic Neuropathy

Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a common complication of diabetes that is becoming an increasing concern as the prevalence of diabetes rapidly rises. There are several types of DN, but the most prevalent and studied type is distal symmetrical polyneuropathy, which is the focus of this review and is simply referred to as DN. It can lead to a wide range of sensorimotor and psychosocial symptoms and is a major risk factor for diabetic foot ulceration and Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy, which are associated with high rates of lower limb amputation and mortality. The prevention and management of DN are thus critical, and clinical guidelines recommend several strategies for these based on the best available evidence. This article aims to provide a narrative review of DN prevention and management strategies by discussing these guidelines and the evidence that supports them. First, the epidemiology and diverse clinical manifestations of DN are summarized. Then, prevention strategies such as glycemic control, lifestyle modifications and footcare are discussed, as well as the importance of early diagnosis. Finally, neuropathic pain management strategies and promising novel therapies under investigation such as neuromodulation devices and nutraceuticals are reviewed.

Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Following Breast Cancer: Effectiveness and Tolerability of High-Concentration Capsaicin Patch

Purpose

Data supporting the use of high-concentration capsaicin patches (HCCPs) in breast cancer (BC) patients and BC survivors (BCSs) with peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) are limited. This observational study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of HCCP applications in BCSs/BC patients with PNP.

Patients and Methods

Data from all patients treated with HCCP in the pain department of a French comprehensive cancer centre were collected from 01-Jan-2014 to 14-Oct-2020. Independent pain specialists completed the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) for each included patient based on data extracted from patient’s electronic medical record compiled by the treating pain specialist after each HCCP application.

Results

Patients (N=279; mean age: 59.2 years; previous history of PNP medication: 54.5%) received on average 4.1 repeated HCCP applications (1141 HCCP applications); 68.8% received HCCP as an add-on to systemic therapy and 27.9% as first-line therapy. PNP was most frequently caused by surgery (62.4%) followed by chemotherapy (11.8%) and radiotherapy (6.5%). A complete or important analgesic effect was reported at least once by 82.3% of patients. A 6.0% reported no effect at all. For post-surgical PNP existing for <12 months and >10 years an important or complete effect was observed for 70.7% and 56.0% of applications. For chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-induced PNP, this important or complete effect was observed for 52.7% and 52.3% of applications, respectively. HCCP application was associated with site reactions in 54.4% of patients (mainly burning sensation or pain, 45.9%, or erythema, 30.8%) and high blood pressure in 7.2%.

Conclusion

This real-world chart review provides important effectiveness and safety information to clinicians when considering topical options to treat PNP in BCSs/BC patients.