Spinal Pathology and Muscle Morphologies with Chronic Low Back Pain and Lower Limb Amputation

INTRODUCTION

Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent after lower limb amputation (LLA) and contributes to substantial reductions in quality of life and function. Towards understanding pathophysiological mechanisms underlying LBP after LLA, this article compares lumbar spine pathologies and muscle morphologies between individuals with LBP, with and without LLA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We queried electronic medical records of Service members with and without LLA who sought care for LBP at military treatment facilities between January 2002 and May 2020. Two groups with cLBP, one with (n = 15) and one without unilateral transtibial LLA (n = 15), were identified and randomly chosen from a larger sample. Groups were matched by age, mass, and sex. Lumbar muscle morphology, Pfirrmann grades, Modic changes, facet arthrosis, Meyerding grades, and lordosis angle were determined from radiographs and magnetic resonance images available in the medical record. Independent t-tests compared variables between cohorts while multiple regression models determined if intramuscular fat influenced Pfirrmann grades. Chi-square determined differences in presence of spondylolysis and facet arthrosis.

RESULTS

Lordosis angle was larger with LLA (P = 0.01). Spondylolysis was more prevalent with LLA (P = 0.008; 40%) whereas facet arthrosis was similar between cohorts (P = 0.3). Muscle area was not different between cohorts, yet intramuscular fat was greater with LLA (P ≤ 0.05). Intramuscular fat did not influence Pfirrmann grades (P > 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar lumbar muscle size, those with unilateral LLA may be predisposed to progress to symptomatic spondylolisthesis and intramuscular fat. Surgical and/or rehabilitation interventions may mitigate long-term effects of diminished spinal health, decrease LBP-related disability, and improve function for individuals with LLA.

Comparative Analysis of Lower Back Pain and Phantom Pain in Unilateral Lower Limb Amputees: A Study on Amputee Football Players vs. Non-Athletes

Background and Objectives: Amputation poses a significant clinical and therapeutic challenge, with over 90.0% of amputations involving the lower limbs, of which 75.0% are associated with diabetes and peripheral artery disease. Individuals with lower limb amputations often experience secondary disabilities. This study aimed to compare the frequency and intensity of lower back pain and phantom pain in individuals with unilateral lower limb amputations who were amputee football players with those who did not participate in adaptive sports. Materials and Methods: This study included 30 men who had undergone unilateral lower limb amputation and were divided into two groups: 15 amputee football players and 15 men who did not participate in adapted sports. Testing included proprietary surveys, questionnaires, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity. The Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMPnoPRO) was used to assess motor function. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica software (Version 13, StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) by applying Student's t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test, correlation coefficients, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Phantom pain was reported in 53.3% of individuals in the study group and in 66.7% of individuals in the control group, with average median pain intensities of 5.5 (IQR: 2) and 5.5 (IQR: 3), respectively. Lower back pain was significantly higher in the control group (86.7%) than for the football players (33.3%), with median pain intensities of 4 (IQR: 2) and 3 (IQR: 2), respectively. The median disability score was 3 (IQR: 3) in the player group and 10 (IQR: 7) in the control group. The median score in the amputee football player group was 35 (IQR: 2), while that in the control group was only 18 (IQR: 19). Conclusions: Amputee football training did not have a significant impact on the frequency or intensity of phantom pain but was associated with lower occurrence and intensity of pain in the lower back. The players exhibited significantly better motor function and lower levels of disability. Preoperative limb pain was a significant risk factor for phantom pain in the study group. Adaptive sports can not only support the development of motor and social skills but also contribute to reducing the severity of lower back pain, which leads to a decrease in the level of disability.

Lumbar Degenerative Disease and Muscle Morphology Before and After Lower Limb Loss in Four Military Patients

INTRODUCTION

Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent after lower limb amputation (LLA). Reports describing longitudinal changes in spine health before and after amputation are rare. This study describes lumbar spine pathology, muscle morphology, and the continuum of care for LBP before and after LLA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We queried electronic medical records of patients who sought care for LBP before and after unilateral LLA between January 2002 and April 2020 and who had documented lumbar imaging pre- and post-LLA. Patient demographics, muscle morphology, spinal pathology, premorbid and comorbid conditions, self-reported pain, and treatment interventions were assessed.

RESULTS

Four patients with LBP and imaging before and after LLA were identified. Intervertebral disc degeneration progressed after amputation in three patients, whereas facet arthrosis progressed in both female patients. The fat content of lumbar musculature generally increased after amputation. Conservative management of LBP before and after amputation was standard, with progression to steroidal injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar spine health may degrade after amputation. Here, lumbar muscle size did not change after LLA, yet the fat content increased in combination with increases in facet and intervertebral disc degeneration.

The associations of depression, anxiety, and insomnia at baseline with disability at a five-year follow-up point among outpatients with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

No previous study has investigated the associations of depression, anxiety, and insomnia at baseline with disability at a five-year follow-up point among outpatients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The study aimed to simultaneously compare the associations of depression, anxiety, and sleep quality at baseline with disability at a 5-year follow-up point among patients with CLBP.

METHODS

Two-hundred and twenty-five subjects with CLBP were enrolled at baseline, and 111 subjects participated at the five-year follow-up point. At follow-up, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and total months of disability (TMOD) over the past five years were used as the indices of disability. The depression (HADS-D) and anxiety (HADS-A) subscales of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) were used to assess depression, anxiety, and insomnia at baseline and follow-up. Multiple linear regression was employed to test the associations.

RESULTS

The scores of the HADS-D, HADS-A, and ISI were correlated with the ODI at the same time points (both at baseline and follow-up). A greater severity on the HADS-D, an older age, and associated leg symptoms at baseline were independently associated with a greater ODI at follow-up. A greater severity on the HADS-A and fewer educational years at baseline were independently associated with a longer TMOD. The associations of the HADS-D and HADS-A at baseline with disability at follow-up were greater than that of the ISI at baseline, based on the regression models.

CONCLUSION

Greater severities of depression and anxiety at baseline were significantly associated with greater disability at the five-year follow-up point. The associations of depression and anxiety at baseline with disability at the long-term follow-up point might be greater than that of insomnia at baseline.

Comparison of clinical and biomechanical characteristics between individuals with lower limb amputation with and without lower back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lower back pain is a debilitating condition common to individuals with lower limb amputation. It is unclear what risk factors contribute to the development of back pain. This study systematically reviewed and analyzed the available evidence regarding the clinical and biomechanical differences between individuals with amputation, with and without lower back pain.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL databases in November 2020 and repeated in June 2021 and June 2022. Studies were included if they reported comparisons of demographic, anthropometric, biomechanical, and other clinical variables between participants with and without LBP. Study quality and potential for reporting bias were assessed. Meta-analyses were conducted to compare the two groups.

FINDINGS

Thirteen studies were included, with aggregated data from 436 participants (239 with LBP; 197 pain free). The median reporting quality score was 37.5%. The included studies enrolled participants who were predominantly male (mean = 91.4%, range = 77.8-100%) and with trauma-related amputation. Meta-analyses showed that individuals with LBP exhibited moderate (3.4 out of 10) but significantly greater pain than those without LBP. We found no between-group differences in age, height, weight, BMI, and time since amputation (p = 0.121-0.682). No significant differences in trunk/pelvic kinematics during gait were detected (p = 0.07-0.446) between the groups.

INTERPRETATION

Demographic, anthropometric, biomechanical, and simple clinical outcome variables may be insufficient for differentiating the risk of developing back pain after amputation. Investigators should be aware of the existing gender bias in sampling and methodological limitations, as well as to consider incorporating psychosocial measures when studying LBP in this clinical population.

Resveratrol-enhanced SIRT1-mediated osteogenesis in porous endplates attenuates low back pain and anxiety behaviors

Low back pain (LBP) is a major clinical problem that lacks effective treatments. The sensory innervation in porous vertebral endplates and anxiety contributes to spinal hyperalgesia. We hypothesized that SIRT1 activator resveratrol alleviates LBP and anxiety via promotion of osteogenesis in the porous endplates. The hyperalgesia and anxiety-related behaviors; sensory innervation, inflammation and porosity of endplates; and osteogenic/osteoclastic factors expression were measured following resveratrol treatment after lumbar spine instability (LSI) surgery. To explore whether resveratrol promotes endplates osteogenesis and thus alleviates LBP through activation of SIRT1 in the osteoprogenitor cells of endplates, SIRT1OSX-/- mice were employed. Additionally, the levels of inflammation markers, phosphorylation of cAMP response element-binding protein (pCREB), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in hippocampus were evaluated. After 4 or 8 weeks LSI surgery, the mice suffered from hyperalgesia and anxiety, which were efficiently attenuated by resveratrol at 8 weeks. Resveratrol treatment-enhanced osteogenesis and decreased endplates porosities accompanied with the reduction of TNFα, IL-1β, and COX2 levels and CGRP+ nerve fibers innervation in porous endplates. Resveratrol-mediated endplates osteogenesis, decreased endplates porosities, and analgesic and antianxiety effects were abrogated in SIRT1OSX-/- mice. Furthermore, resveratrol relieved inflammation and increased pCREB and BDNF expression in the hippocampus after 8 weeks, which alleviate anxiety-related behaviors. This study provides that resveratrol-mediated porous endplates osteogenesis via the activation of SIRT1 markedly blocked sensory innervation and inflammation in endplates, therefore, alleviating LSI surgery-induced LBP and hippocampus-related anxiety.

Resolving the Burden of Low Back Pain in Military Service Members and Veterans (RESOLVE): Protocol for a Multisite Pragmatic Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Physical therapy (PT) is frequently used for the management of low back pain (LBP) within the US Departments of Defense (DOD) and Veterans Affairs (VA). However, variations in PT practice patterns and use of ineffective interventions lower the quality and increase the cost of care. Although adherence to the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can improve the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of LBP care, PT CPG adherence remains below 50%. The Resolving the Burden of Low Back Pain in Military Service Members and Veterans (RESOLVE) trial will evaluate the effectiveness of an active PT CPG implementation strategy using an education, audit, and feedback model for reducing pain, disability, medication use, and cost of LBP care within the DOD and VA health care systems.

DESIGN

The RESOLVE trial will include 3,300 to 7,260 patients with LBP across three DOD and two VA medical facilities using a stepped-wedge study design. An education, audit, and feedback model will be used to encourage physical therapists to better adhere to the PT CPG recommendations. The Oswestry Disability Index and the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale will be used as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes will include the LBP-related medication use, medical resource utilization, and biopsychosocial predictors of outcomes. Statistical analyses will be based on the intention-to-treat principle and will use linear mixed models to compare treatment conditions and examine the interactions between treatment and subgrouping status (e.g., limb loss).

SUMMARY

The RESOLVE trial will provide a pragmatic approach to evaluate whether better adherence to PT CPGs can reduce pain, disability, medication use, and LBP care cost within the DOD and VA health care systems.