Application of High-Intensity Functional Resistance Training in a Skilled Nursing Facility: An Implementation Study

Multicomponent telerehabilitation program for veterans with multimorbidity: A randomized controlled feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Older veterans with multimorbidity experience physical and social vulnerabilities that complicate receipt of and adherence to physical rehabilitation services. Thus, traditional physical rehabilitation programs are insufficient to address this population's heterogenous clinical presentation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a MultiComponent TeleRehabilitation (MCTR) program for older veterans with multimorbidity.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled cross-over feasibility study.

SETTING

Telehealth from Veterans Affairs Medical Center to participants' homes.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty U.S. military veterans, age ≥60 years (mean ± SD; 69.2 ± 6.7) with ≥3 comorbidities (6.0 ± 1.9), and impaired physical function were randomized and allocated equally to two groups.

INTERVENTION

The MCTR program consisted of high-intensity rehabilitation, coaching, social support, and technologies. Physical therapists delivered 12 individual and 20 group telerehabilitation sessions/participant. Participants in the education group started the MCTR program after 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was combined adherence (>75% of participants attending ≥80% sessions). Acceptability was measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Secondary outcomes included safety, participant surveys, and physical function. Patient-level outcomes were collected at baseline, 12 (primary time point), and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 50 participants, 39 adhered to total session attendance (0.78 [95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.88], p = .76), 45 adhered to individual sessions (0.90 [95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.97], p = .01), and 48 rated the program as acceptable (0.96 [95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.99], p < .001). Thirty-five participants reported 78 safety events, and 12 (15%) had some degree of relatedness to the protocol. Most patient-level outcomes were similar between groups at 12-weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The MCTR program was feasible based on high adherence to individual sessions and high acceptability. Adherence results were consistent with previous exercise studies in older adults. Most in-session safety events were related to underlying medical conditions and consistent with in-person physical rehabilitation safety events. These results can inform use of telerehabilitation for similar populations.

The Case for Aggregated Rehabilitation-Relevant Data Across Health Care Systems and Settings

Health care value, quantified as outcome per unit cost, requires knowing which outcomes are influenced by which intervention at what cost. The value of rehabilitation is still largely unknown. Much of the reason for this limited evidence is historically poor standardization and collection of rehabilitation interventions, and objectively measured outcomes across care settings, care providers, and health care systems. The purposeful standardization and aggregation of rehabilitation-relevant data about interventions, cost, and outcomes from routine clinical practices offers potential to understand and improve the value of rehabilitation. This perspective details the critical need for rehabilitation-relevant data that are aggregated across settings, providers, and systems and proposes 3 options to meet this need, including (1) integrating rehabilitation-relevant data into existing research registry databases that are condition specific, (2) adding rehabilitation-relevant data to federally funded research networks, and (3) creating a novel rehabilitation registry database. There must be continued pursuit of discovering which rehabilitation interventions achieve which specific outcomes, in which settings, for which patients, and at what costs. Successfully aggregating rehabilitation-relevant data is critical for generating evidence that answers these key questions about the value of rehabilitation.

"No Matter the Age or Medical Complexity, People Benefit From That Intensity of Exercise": A Mixed-Methods Study Describing Rehabilitation Provider Perceptions of High-Intensity Resistance Training Among Veterans Receiving Post-Acute Care

BACKGROUND

In skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), i-STRONGER is a novel, high-intensity resistance training approach that incorporates progressive resistance training to promote greater improvements in patient function compared to usual care. To inform large-scale expansion of i-STRONGER as standard-of-care in SNFs, this mixed-methods study assessed rehabilitation providers' perceptions of i-STRONGER and purported needs for its adoption.

METHODS

Forty-three rehabilitation providers participated in an 18-week, interactive i-STRONGER training program. Post-training, the validated Perceived Characteristics of Intervention Scale was used to evaluate i-STRONGER relative advantage, compatibility with practice, complexity, potential for reinvention (ie, adaptability), trialability, and risk. Providers reported the top 3 needs for successful i-STRONGER adoption and described i-STRONGER perceptions in training modules and focus groups. A convergent mixed-methods design was used to evaluate and describe clinician perceptions of i-STRONGER.

RESULTS

i-STRONGER program conceptually aligned with providers' practice. The patterns and was endorsed as feasible and adaptable as part of patient care; however, initial hesitancies surrounding patients' physical abilities and motivation were noted as barriers and appeared to reflect negative age-related beliefs and attitudes within SNF cultures. Providers feared patients would be unwilling or unable to engage with i-STRONGER activities due to their age, deconditioning, medical complexity, or expectation that rehabilitation should feel "easier." As providers began implementing i-STRONGER in real-time, concerns surrounding i-STRONGER's potential risks lessened as providers observed improvements in patient function and motivation, and patients were described as "embracing" i-STRONGER principles. Patient acceptance and satisfaction, equipment, time, and clear communication among providers were cited as critical needs for i-STRONGER adoption.

CONCLUSIONS

With i-STRONGER, a safe and effective approach for delivering resistance training to older adults in SNF settings, "seeing is believing." Real-time implementation of i-STRONGER facilitated an evolution of perspective among providers, fueled by observable, positive changes in patient function and affect as well as unexpected patient participation. Findings support i-STRONGER use in SNF settings, provided that specific training strategies showcase older adults with medical complexity participating in progressive resistance training.

Mixed-Method Evaluation to Understand Clinician Perspectives of a Program to Implement High-Intensity Resistance Rehabilitation Into Skilled Nursing Facilities

OBJECTIVE

To assess rehabilitation clinicians' viewpoints regarding a multicomponent implementation program aimed at promoting high-intensity resistance rehabilitation (HIR), as well as practical implications for its use in skilled nursing facility (SNF) rehabilitation.

DESIGN

Prospective convergent mixed-method design.

SETTING

Eight rural SNFs within the Department of Veterans Affairs.

PARTICIPANTS

Physical rehabilitation clinicians (physical and occupational therapists, physical and occupational therapy assistants, recreational therapists, and kinesiotherapists) who engaged with the implementation program (n=38).

INTERVENTIONS

Clinicians engaged with the multicomponent implementation program to promote the use of HIR in clinical practice. The program components included clinician training (i.e., virtual didactic modules with synchronous case discussions), provision of resources (e.g., equipment, job aids), and facilitated implementation (e.g., external implementation facilitator support, distributed tips and tricks).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Training Acceptability Rating Scale, study-specific questionnaires, and qualitative focus groups exploring perceived acceptability, feasibility, and effect on work experience.

RESULTS

Questionnaires revealed high levels of implementation program acceptability and perceived effect, alongside moderate levels of feasibility. Focus group themes supported these findings, explaining high acceptability and effect through differentiation from other trainings and prolonged engagement. Feasibility results were explained qualitatively by facilitatory factors (i.e., team participation, reduced caseloads, training characteristics) and inhibitory factors (i.e., training timing, self-paced scheduling logistics, lack of protected time and space). There was no reported negative effect on clinician work experience.

CONCLUSIONS

According to SNF clinician perspectives, a positive HIR implementation experience may be enhanced through implementation programs that provide prolonged engagement and a self-paced structure with built-in accountability. Leadership and organizational support appear important to protect time and space for clinicians who experience competing priorities to successfully facilitate evidence uptake. Future work can evaluate the applicability across various contexts beyond rural VA SNFs.

Progressive Multicomponent Intervention for Older Adults in Home Health Settings Following Hospitalization: Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

Reduced physical function following hospitalization places older adults at risk of adverse health events. Many older adults receive home health physical therapy to reverse their deconditioning; however, optimal approaches to improve physical function are currently not known. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a home health care approach comprised of high-intensity exercise, enhanced care transition, and protein supplementation.

METHODS

Eligible participants included adults aged 65 years or older referred to home health care following hospitalization. Two hundred older adults who are medically complex were enrolled and were randomized 1:1 to (1) a high-intensity progressive, multi-component (PMC) intervention or (2) enhanced usual care (UC) comparison group. All participants received 12 visits over 60 days. The primary study outcome was change in the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) from baseline to 60 days. Secondary outcomes included gait speed (usual, fast), modified Physical Performance Test, grip strength, Fatigue Severity Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale-International, physical activity (step count), and adverse events (falls, emergency department visits, hospitalizations). All outcomes were collected at baseline, then 30, 60, 90, and 180 days post baseline.

RESULTS

There was no difference in 60-day SPPB change between groups with both groups experiencing significant improvements (PMC = 1.53 [95% CI: 1.00-2.05]; enhanced UC = 1.39 [95% CI = 0.89-1.88]). Differences were also not observed in secondary measures or adverse events at any time point.

CONCLUSION

An intervention consisting of high-intensity exercise, enhanced care transition, and protein supplementation was not associated with greater functional improvement at 60 days compared to enhanced UC in older adults receiving home health physical therapy.

IMPACT

The findings of this study demonstrate that a high-intensity progressive, multi-component intervention results in similar physical functional changes as an enhanced UC intervention in older adults who are medically complex and receiving home health care following hospital-associated deconditioning.

A Novel Behavioral Intervention to Enhance Physical Activity for Older Veterans in a Skilled Nursing Facility

Physical activity levels during skilled nursing facility (SNF) rehabilitation fall far below what is needed for successful community living and to prevent adverse events. This feasibility study's purpose was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of an intervention designed to improve physical activity in patients admitted to SNFs for short-term rehabilitation. High-Intensity Rehabilitation plus Mobility combined a high-intensity (i.e., high weight, low repetition), progressive (increasing in difficulty over time), and functional resistance rehabilitation intervention with a behavioral economics-based physical activity program. The behavioral economics component included five mobility sessions/week with structured goal setting, gamification, and loss aversion (the idea that people are more likely to change a behavior in response to a potential loss over a potential gain). SNF physical therapists, occupational therapists, and a mobility coach implemented the High-Intensity Rehabilitation plus Mobility protocol with older Veterans (n = 18) from a single SNF. Participants demonstrated high adherence to the mobility protocol and were highly satisfied with their rehabilitation. Treatment fidelity scores for clinicians were ≥95%. We did not observe a hypothesized 40% improvement in step counts or time spent upright. However, High-Intensity Rehabilitation plus Mobility participants made clinically important improvements in short physical performance battery scores and gait speed from admission to discharge that were qualitatively similar to or slightly higher than historical cohorts from the same SNF that had received usual care or high-intensity rehabilitation alone. These results suggest a structured physical activity program can be feasibly combined with high-intensity rehabilitation for SNF residents following a hospital stay.

Physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions for people living with both frailty and multiple long-term conditions and their informal carers: a scoping review and stakeholder consultation

INTRODUCTION

This scoping review mapped evidence on physical activity (including structured exercise) and sedentary behaviour interventions (interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour) in people living with both frailty and multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) and their informal carers.

METHODS

Ten databases and grey literature were searched from 2000 to October 2023. Two reviewers screened studies and one extracted data. Results were shared with three stakeholder groups (n = 21) in a consultation phase.

RESULTS

After screening, 155 papers from 144 studies (1 ongoing) were retained. The majority were randomised controlled trials (86, 55%). Participants' mean age was 73 ± 12 years, and 73% were of White ethnicity. MLTC and frailty measurement varied widely. Most participants were pre-to-moderately frail. Physical health conditions predominated over mental health conditions.Interventions focused on structured exercise (83 studies, 60%) or combined interventions (55 studies, 39%). Two (1%) and one (0.7%) focused solely on habitual physical activity or sedentary behaviour. Adherence was 81% (interquartile range 62%-89%) with goal setting, monitoring and support important to adherence. Carers were only involved in 15 (11%) studies. Most interventions reported positive outcomes, primarily focusing on body functions and structures.

CONCLUSIONS

A modest volume of evidence exists on multicomponent structured exercise interventions, with less focus on habitual physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Interventions report largely positive effects, but an updated systematic review is required. The field could be advanced by more rigorous characterisation of MLTCs, socioeconomic status and ethnicity, increased informal carer involvement and further evaluation of habitual physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions.

Effectiveness of a multicomponent rehabilitation protocol on outcomes following post-acute care

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a multicomponent rehabilitation protocol on functional outcomes in a post-acute care facility.

METHODS

Eleven older, medically complex patients (80.3 ± 7.3 yrs) completed a multicomponent rehabilitation protocol during a stay at a post-acute care facility. Gait speed, Berg Balance scores, and sit-to-stand velocity were examined upon admission and discharge. Bayesian paired sample t-tests were used to determine changes from PRE to POST and linear regression analyses were used to determine the influence of length of stay.

FINDINGS

Gait speed increased by 0.26 m/s (49% increase) from PRE (0.65 ± 0.38 m/s) to POST (0.90 ± 0.42 m/s) exercise intervention (p = 0.013). Berg Balance Scores significantly increased by 26% from PRE (38.27 ± 8.33) to POST (45.73 ± 3.32) exercise intervention (p = 0.009). A 45% increase in STS velocity from PRE (0.37 ± 0.14 m/s) to POST (0.51 ± 0.13 m/s; p ≤ 0.001) was observed following the multicomponent rehabilitation protocol. Length of stay did not influence improvements in gait speed, Berg Balance Scores, nor Sit-to-stand velocity (p = 0.176-0.811).

INTERPRETATIONS

The multicomponent rehabilitation protocol with movement velocity biofeedback is feasible in a post-acute care facility in medically complex older patients and demonstrates improvements in clinical mobility and balance outcomes.

Older Veterans' Experiences of a Multicomponent Telehealth Program: Qualitative Program Evaluation Study

BACKGROUND

There are 8.8 million American veterans aged >65 years. Older veterans often have multiple health conditions that increase their risk of social isolation and loneliness, disability, adverse health events (eg, hospitalization and death), mental illness, and heavy health care use. This population also exhibits low levels of physical function and daily physical activity, which are factors that can negatively influence health. Importantly, these are modifiable risk factors that are amenable to physical therapy intervention. We used a working model based on the dynamic biopsychosocial framework and social cognitive theory to conceptualize the multifactorial needs of older veterans with multiple health conditions and develop a novel, 4-component telehealth program to address their complex needs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe veterans' experiences of a multicomponent telehealth program and identify opportunities for quality and process improvement. We conducted qualitative interviews with telehealth program participants to collect their feedback on this novel program; explore their experience of program components; and document perceived outcomes and the impact on their daily life, relationships, and quality of life.

METHODS

As part of a multimethod program evaluation, semistructured interviews were conducted with key informants who completed ≥8 weeks of the 12-week multicomponent telehealth program for veterans aged ≥50 years with at least 3 medical comorbidities. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analyzed by a team of 2 coders using a directed content analysis approach and Dedoose software was used to assist with data analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 21 individuals enrolled in the program, 15 (71%) met the inclusion criteria for interviews. All 15 individuals completed 1-hour interviews. A total of 6 main conceptual domains were identified: technology, social networks, therapeutic relationship, patient attributes, access, and feasibility. Themes associated with each domain detail participant experiences of the telehealth program. Key informants also provided feedback related to different components of the program, leading to adaptations for the biobehavioral intervention, group sessions (transition from individual to group sessions and group session dynamics), and technology supports.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this program evaluation identified quality and process improvements, which were made before rigorously testing the intervention in a larger population through a randomized controlled trial. The findings may inform adaptations of similar programs in different contexts. Further research is needed to develop a deeper understanding of how program components influence social health and longer-term behavior change.

High-intensity home health physical therapy among older adult Veterans: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Older adult Veterans are at high risk for adverse health outcomes following hospitalization. Since physical function is one of the largest potentially modifiable risk factors for adverse health outcomes, our purpose was to determine if progressive, high-intensity resistance training in home health physical therapy (PT) improves physical function in Veterans more than standardized home health PT and to determine if the high-intensity program was comparably safe, defined as having a similar number of adverse events.

METHODS

We enrolled Veterans and their spouses during an acute hospitalization who were recommended to receive home health care on discharge because of physical deconditioning. We excluded individuals who had contraindications to high-intensity resistance training. A total of 150 participants were randomized 1:1 to either (1) a progressive, high-intensity (PHIT) PT intervention or (2) a standardized PT intervention (comparison group). All participants in both groups were assigned to receive 12 visits (3 visits/week over 30 days) in their home. The primary outcome was gait speed at 60 days. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (rehospitalizations, emergency department visits, falls and deaths after 30 and 60-days), gait speed, Modified Physical Performance Test, Timed Up-and-Go, Short Physical Performance Battery, muscle strength, Life-Space Mobility assessment, Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey, Saint Louis University Mental Status exam, and step counts at 30, 60, 90, 180 days post-randomization.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups in gait speed at 60 days, and no significant differences in adverse events between groups at either time point. Similarly, physical performance measures and patient reported outcomes were not different at any time point. Notably, participants in both groups experienced increases in gait speed that met or exceeded established clinically important thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adult Veterans with hospital-associated deconditioning and multimorbidity, high-intensity home health PT was safe and effective in improving physical function, but not found to be more effective than a standardized PT program.

Advancing Rehabilitation Paradigms for Older Adults in Skilled Nursing Facilities: An Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Type 1 Clinical Trial Protocol

OBJECTIVE

Skilled nursing facility rehabilitation is commonly required to address hospital-associated deconditioning among older adults with medical complexity. In skilled nursing facilities, standard-of-care rehabilitation focuses on low-intensity interventions, which are not designed to sufficiently challenge skeletal muscle and impart functional improvements. In contrast, a high-intensity resistance training approach (IntenSive Therapeutic Rehabilitation for Older NursinG homE Residents; i-STRONGER) in a single-site pilot study resulted in better physical function among patients in skilled nursing facilities. To extend this work, an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 design, cluster-randomized trial will be conducted to compare patient outcomes between 16 skilled nursing facilities utilizing i-STRONGER principles and 16 Usual Care sites.

METHODS

Clinicians at i-STRONGER sites will be trained to deliver i-STRONGER as a standard of care using an implementation package that includes a clinician training program. Clinicians at Usual Care sites will continue to provide usual care. Posttraining, changes in physical performance (eg, gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery scores) from patients' admission to discharge will be collected over a period of 12 months. The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework will be used to evaluate i-STRONGER effectiveness and factors underlying successful i-STRONGER implementation. Effectiveness will be evaluated by comparing changes in physical function between study arms. Reach (proportion of patients treated with i-STRONGER), adoption (proportion of clinicians utilizing i-STRONGER), implementation (i-STRONGER fidelity), and maintenance (i-STRONGER sustainment) will be concurrently quantified and informed by clinician surveys and focus groups.

IMPACT

This effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 cluster-randomized trial has the potential to shift rehabilitation care paradigms in a nationwide network of skilled nursing facilities, resulting in improved patient outcomes and functional independence. Furthermore, evaluation of the facilitators of, and barriers to, implementation of i-STRONGER in real-world clinical settings will critically inform future work evaluating and implementing best rehabilitation practices in skilled nursing facilities.

Exercise Guidelines to Counteract Physical Deconditioning in Long-Term Care Facilities: What to Do and How to Do It?

With age, older adults experience a decrease in muscle function and changes in body composition, which raise the risk of functional incapacity and loss of autonomy. These declines are more pronounced in older adults living in long-term care (LTC) facilities than those living in the community (ie, sarcopenia prevalence: ∼41% vs ∼10%; obesity prevalence: 30% vs17%). The main cause of these declines is chronic diseases, which are a driver of higher rates of sedentary behavior (85% of time in LTC). Exercise, however, is recognized to help counteract age-related decline, yet it is not integrated into clinical practice.

An innovative rehabilitation program for the veterans affairs post-acute skilled nursing setting: Preliminary results

BACKGROUND

Skilled nursing rehabilitative care plays a critical role in older adults' functional recovery impacting post-discharge outcomes. Variations across post-acute rehabilitative care services and patient outcomes indicate a need to improve rehabilitative care in this setting. We adapted a successful outpatient care program (Live Long Walk Strong-LLWS) to address this need in post-acute care settings within the Veterans Health Administration. LLWS differs from standard PT care by treating impairments linked to functional decline that are not traditionally targeted by standard care, providing formalized coaching to optimize behavior change, and providing post-discharge case management to optimize long-term outcomes. The purpose was to adapt, refine and implement the LLWS program for the Community Living Center (CLC), determine its acceptability and feasibility, and evaluate its preliminary effectiveness among older adults.

METHODS

The design of the program was adapted from the original outpatient LLWS program to the CLC setting through quality improvement methods and the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) framework. Primary outcomes included measures of feasibility and acceptability of >80% enrollment and completion of sessions as well as preliminary effectiveness using performance-based and patient-reported measures of function including the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), AM-PAC, a Global Rating of Change questionnaire, and a satisfaction survey.

RESULTS

After 18 months, 51 Veterans had enrolled in the LLWS program, with 94.1% maintaining enrollment. We observed >80% completion of the inpatient and home follow-up sessions. Most patients were highly satisfied with care. Improvements in the SPPB (2.3 (SD 2.2) points), gait speed (0.17 (0.14) m/s) and the AM-PAC (6.5 (SD 5.7)) surpassed clinically meaningful thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel care program is feasible and acceptable to Veterans, demonstrating preliminary effectiveness with improving functional outcomes. Future research is needed to further examine the program's impact on other important outcomes relative to standard modes of care.

Safety, feasibility and initial efficacy of an app-facilitated telerehabilitation (AFTER) programme for COVID-19 survivors: a pilot randomised study

OBJECTIVES

Determine the safety, feasibility and initial efficacy of a multicomponent telerehabilitation programme for COVID-19 survivors.

DESIGN

Pilot randomised feasibility study.

SETTING

In-home telerehabilitation.

PARTICIPANTS

44 participants (21 female, mean age 52 years) discharged home following hospitalisation with COVID-19 (with and without intensive care unit (ICU) stay).

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were block randomised 2:1 to receive 12 individual biobehaviourally informed, app-facilitated, multicomponent telerehabilitation sessions with a licenced physical therapist (n=29) or to a control group (n=15) consisting of education on exercise and COVID-19 recovery trajectory, physical activity and vitals monitoring, and weekly check-ins with study staff. Interventions were 100% remote and occurred over 12 weeks.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was feasibility, including safety and session adherence. Secondary outcomes included preliminary efficacy outcomes including tests of function and balance; patient-reported outcome measures; a cognitive assessment; and average daily step count. The 30 s chair stand test was the main secondary (efficacy) outcome.

RESULTS

No adverse events (AEs) occurred during testing or in telerehabilitation sessions; 38% (11/29) of the intervention group compared with 60% (9/15) of the control group experienced an AE (p=0.21), most of which were minor, over the course of the 12-week study. 27 of 29 participants (93%; 95% CI 77% to 99%) receiving the intervention attended ≥75% of sessions. Both groups demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in secondary outcomes with no statistically significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

Fully remote telerehabilitation was safe, feasible, had high adherence for COVID-19 recovery, and may apply to other medically complex patients including those with barriers to access care. This pilot study was designed to evaluate feasibility; further efficacy evaluation is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04663945.

Implementation of a rehabilitation model in a Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): Preliminary data

BACKGROUND

Nursing home eligible participants in the Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) are at high risk for falls. Physical function is a modifiable predictor of falls and an important target for prevention. We engaged a PACE site to explore feasibility of implementing progressive intensive rehabilitation to improve physical function and preliminary patient-level improvements.

METHODS

The research involved a mixed-methods, pre-post implementation study with longitudinal patient follow-up at one Denver PACE site. Older adults at risk for institutionalization (N = 28) took part in Screening and high-intensity interventions to Improve Falls risk and Transform expectations in age and aging (SHIFT) rehabilitation program over six weeks. Outcomes included the short physical performance battery (SPPB); 4-meter gait speed at baseline, discharge, and 6 and 12 months postdischarge from SHIFT. A focus group with staff explored facilitators and barriers to program implementation in the PACE setting and with complex patients and perceived effectiveness.

RESULTS

The rehabilitation team demonstrated high treatment fidelity to SHIFT (>80%). No treatment-specific adverse events were reported. SPPB scores and gait speeds improved significantly over time (p < 0.005). The average SPPB score at evaluation was 4.6 ± 0.24 compared to 7.7 ± 0.38 points at discharge. The average gait speed at evaluation was 0.58 ± 0.03 meters/second (m/s) compared to 0.79 ± 0.04 m/s at discharge. Common barriers to program completion included changes in health status and environmental factors (e.g., transportation).

CONCLUSIONS

Rehabilitation therapists incorporated a high-intensity resistance training program into routine care of complex older adults in PACE and improved pre-post physical function to levels above independence thresholds (SPPB ≥6; gait speed ≥0.65 m/s). Our pilot implementation study informed refinement of eligibility criteria, number of visits, and strategies to address long-term adherence to enhance scalability and optimize impact.

Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding Determinants of Practice Change in Skilled Nursing Facility Rehabilitation: Adapting to and Sustaining Value With Postacute Reform

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Postacute care reform is driving physical and occupational therapists in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) to change how they deliver care to produce better outcomes in less time. However, gaps exist in understanding determinants of practice change, which limits translation of evidence into practice. This study explored what determinants impacted change in care delivery at 2 SNFs that implemented a high-intensity resistance training intervention.

METHODS

We used a mixed-methods, sequential explanatory design to explain quantitative findings using qualitative methods with a multiple-case study approach. Quantitative data were collected on therapists' attitudes toward evidence-based practice and aspects of intervention implementation. We conducted focus groups with therapists (N = 15) at 2 SNFs, classified as either high- (SNF-H) or low-performing (SNF-L) based on implementation fidelity and sustainability.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Determinants of SNF rehabilitation practice change included the organizational system, team dynamics, patient and therapist self-efficacy, perceptions of intervention effectiveness, and ability to overcome preconceived notions. A patient-centered system, positive team dynamics, and ability to overcome preconceived notions fostered practice change at SNF-H. While self-efficacy and perception of effectiveness positively impacted change in practice at both SNFs, these determinants were not enough to overcome challenges at SNF-L. To adapt to changes and sustain rehabilitation value, further research must identify the combination of determinants that promote application of evidence-based practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first step in understanding what drives change in SNF rehabilitation practice. As SNF rehabilitation continues to face changes in health care delivery and reimbursement, therapists will need to adapt, by changing practice patterns and adopting evidence-based approaches, to demonstrate value in postacute care.