Effect of methotrexate and sulphasalazine on UMR 106 rat osteosarcoma cells

Effect of methotrexate on bone and wound healing

INTRODUCTION

Methotrexate (MTX) is one of the most commonly used disease modifying drugs administered for wide spectrum of conditions. Through the expansion of the indications of MTX use, an increasing number of patients nowadays attend orthopaedic departments receiving this pharmacological agent. The aim of this manuscript is to present our current understanding on the effect of MTX on bone and wound healing. Areas covered: The authors offer a comprehensive review of the existing literature on the experimental and clinical studies analysing the effect of MTX on bone and wound healing. The authors also analyse the available literature and describe the incidence of complications after elective orthopaedic surgery in patients receiving MTX. Expert opinion: The available experimental data and clinical evidence are rather inadequate to allow any safe scientific conclusions on the effect of MTX on bone healing. Regarding wound healing, in vitro and experimental animal studies suggest that MTX can adversely affect wound healing, whilst the clinical studies show that lose-dose MTX is safe and does not affect the incidence of postoperative wound complications.

Inhibition of breast cancer-cell glutamate release with sulfasalazine limits cancer-induced bone pain

Cancer in bone is frequently a result of metastases from distant sites, particularly from the breast, lung, and prostate. Pain is a common and often severe pathological feature of cancers in bone, and is a significant impediment to the maintenance of quality of life of patients living with bone metastases. Cancer cell lines have been demonstrated to release significant amounts of the neurotransmitter and cell-signalling molecule l-glutamate via the system xC(-) cystine/glutamate antiporter. We have developed a novel mouse model of breast cancer bone metastases to investigate the impact of inhibiting cancer cell glutamate transporters on nociceptive behaviour. Immunodeficient mice were inoculated intrafemorally with the human breast adenocarcinoma cell line MDA-MB-231, then treated 14days later via mini-osmotic pumps inserted intraperitoneally with sulfasalazine, (S)-4-carboxyphenylglycine, or vehicle. Both sulfasalazine and (S)-4-carboxyphenylglycine attenuated in vitro cancer cell glutamate release in a dose-dependent manner via the system xC(-) transporter. Animals treated with sulfasalazine displayed reduced nociceptive behaviours and an extended time until the onset of behavioural evidence of pain. Animals treated with a lower dose of (S)-4-carboxyphenylglycine did not display this reduction in nociceptive behaviour. These results suggest that a reduction in glutamate secretion from cancers in bone with the system xC(-) inhibitor sulfasalazine may provide some benefit for treating the often severe and intractable pain associated with bone metastases.

Bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in a group of male ankylosing spondylitis patients: relationship to disease activity

Conflicting data have been published about osteoporosis and bone turnover markers in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The aim of this study was to determine bone mineral density (BMD) of the lateral lumbar spine in a group of male patients with AS and to investigate the relationship between clinical parameters and markers of bone turnover. Thirty-two consecutive AS patients with a mean disease duration of 14.8 years and 32 control subjects were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) was used to determine the activity of disease. BMD was determined for the lateral lumbar spine in both patients and control groups. Serum osteocalcin and urinary N-telopeptide were measured as bone turnover markers in patient and control groups. Although the mean values of lumbar BMD in AS patients tended to be lower than in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. Osteoporosis was observed in 11 (34.3%) of AS patients and in 2 (6.2%) of the control group. Osteocalcin levels were significantly higher in AS patients in comparison with control subjects (p < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis according to the activity of the disease, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and N-telopeptide levels were significantly higher in the severely active group when compared with that in mild or moderate disease groups. Active AS patients compared with the control group had significantly lower BMD and significantly higher N-Telopeptide levels (p < 0.05). The levels of BASDAI scores and N-telopeptide values correlated significantly with each other. The incidence of osteoporosis is high in AS patients, and patients with active disease are especially at risk for developing osteoporosis. The monitoring of bone turnover markers and disease activity indices may help to predict patients at risk. Prophylactic and therapeutic strategies are needed to struggle against bone loss in patients with this disabling condition.

Osteoporosis due to cancer treatment: pathogenesis and management

Many therapeutic regimens in cancer treatment carry the risk of causing or favoring the development of osteoporosis. Therapies in which hypogonadism may occur are most relevant in this respect. Prompt hormone replacement therapy is indicated in these patients. In patients in whom this is undesirable because of a hormone-dependent tumor, the risk of osteoporosis should be assessed by means of osteodensitometry, and prophylactic or therapeutic measures should be instituted if necessary. Early intervention improves outcome because osteoporosis therapy is most effective in preventing deterioration of bone mass. There remains much uncertainty in assessing the risk of combination chemotherapy with regard to the development of osteoporosis. Negative effects on the skeleton have, however, been demonstrated for individual drugs, such as methotrexate and ifosfamide. Negative effects of the tumor itself on bone metabolism may aggravate the degree of osteoporosis. Detailed data and long-term experience to assess the risk are urgently needed in this area and constitute an important research topic for the coming years and decades. This review discusses the most prevalent mechanisms of osteoporosis caused by cancer treatment and outlines therapeutic strategies for the prevention and treatment of therapy-induced bone loss.