Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug use according to the 'sawtooth' treatment strategy improves the functional outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a long-term follow-up study with review of the literature

Opposing Trends in Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasties for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis vs. the General Population-A 14-Year Retrospective Study in Taiwan

Objective: To determine the trend of incidence rate of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), and TKA or THA (major joint arthroplasty, MJA) among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) population and compared them with general population (GP) in Taiwan.

Methods: Incidence rates and trends of TKA, THA, and MJA were determined over a 14-year period (2000–2013) among RA patients and compared them with GP. RA of patients was diagnosed based on the ACR 1987 criteria and extracted from GP. Subanalyses of incidences of TKA, THA, and MJA by year, 10-year age group, and gender were further conducted for demographic analysis. Patient profiles were extracted from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) for interrupted time-series analysis and cohort studies.

Results: Patients enrolled were 168,457 receiving TKA, 64,543 receiving THA, and 228,191 receiving MJA surgery. Incidences of TKA, THA, and MJA in RA patients were significantly lower by 49.0, 41.5, and 41.0% compared with concomitantly rises in GP by 131.0, 25.1, and 90.0% among the GP during the study period. The dominant age population for TKA, THA, and MJA were those aged 70–79 years in both GP and RA groups.

Conclusions: We found an opposing trend in incidence of TKA, THA, and MJA between RA patients and the GP. The possible influence of pharmacological treatment is implicated for the lower incidence rates of TKA, THA, and MJA surgeries among RA patients.

Factors contributing to disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients: An Egyptian multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

Minimizing disability and enhancing physical function to its optimal levels is still a challenge in management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim is to identify factors leading to disability in RA.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional Egyptian multicenter study carried out on 215 RA patients attending to our inpatient and outpatient rheumatology clinics during 4 months starting from April to July 2017 who agreed to participate in the study; 170 patients were from Cairo University hospitals and 45 from Zagazig University hospitals. We recorded a number of possible risk factors including demographic, clinical, serological and therapeutic factors. The assessment of patients' disability was done using Modified HAQ (MHAQ).

RESULTS

A significant positive correlation was found between MHAQ and different markers of activity in addition to age and depression score (P<0.001). Illiteracy accounted for higher MHAQ scores (P=0.001). A higher MHAQ was found in patients with ischemic heart disease (P<0.05). Patients with erosions on X-rays had significantly higher MHAQ scores. Subluxations also accounted for higher MHAQ scores (P=0.000).

CONCLUSION

Aging, illiteracy, disease activity, erosions, subluxations, depression and ischemic heart disease were all related to higher disability. Good control of disease activity which in turn reduces erosions and subluxations is mandatory. Screening for depression and proper use of anti-depressants is of great value. Proper screening and prophylaxis is recommended against ischemic heart disease by controlling modifiable risk factors like obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, smoking and sedentary lifestyle.

[Monitoring the functional capacity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis for three years]

OBJECTIVE

To quantify modification of functional capacity in a three year period in a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using HAQ and EPM-ROM inventories.

METHODS

Forty patients with RA on methotrexate (MTX) as disease-modifying anti rheumatic drug (DMARD) were followed for up to three years. The functional status was assessed at the beginning and end of the period by HAQ and EPM-ROM.

RESULTS

Thirty two patients were retrieved, with initial HAQ score of 1.14±0.49 (mean±SD) and EPM-ROM score of 5.8±2.75. After an average period of three years, the HAQ score was 1.13±0.49 and EPM-ROM score, 6.81±3.66. In the subgroup of seven patients submitted to orthopedic surgery, HAQ score decreased from 0.84±0.72 to 1.64±0.56 and the EPM-ROM score, from 5.8±1.80 to 8.3±0.74. In the subgroup of non-operated patients, HAQ score varied from of 1.2±0.45 to 1.07±0.70 and EPM-ROM score, from 5.7±3.06 to 6.4±3.90.

CONCLUSION

In a group of RA patients in use of only MTX as DMARD, there was little change on HAQ score and EPM-ROM scores over the average period of three years. Worsening functional capacity was observed in the group of operated patients in comparison to the not operated ones. This fact alerts us to the need for use of broader therapeutic regimens availability of musculoskeletal surgeries in a timely manner in patients with RA.

The decline in joint replacement surgery in rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a concomitant increase in the intensity of anti-rheumatic therapy: a nationwide register-based study from 1995 through 2010

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Drug-based treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved markedly over the past 2 decades. Using nationwide register data, we studied how this has affected the rates of hip, knee, shoulder, and elbow replacement from 1995 to 2010.

METHODS

The number of primary joint replacements was obtained from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. To test the hypothesis that improvements in medical treatment of RA reduce the need for joint replacements, we also collected data about purchases of different disease-modifying anti-rheumatic agents (DMARDs) and biological drugs from the nationwide drug registers.

RESULTS

The annual incidence of primary joint replacements for RA declined from 19 per 10(5) in 1995 to 11 per 10(5) in 2010. The decline was greater for upper-limb operations than for lower-limb operations. At the same time, the numbers of individuals using methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and sulfasalazine (the most commonly used DMARDs) increased 2- to 4-fold.

INTERPRETATION

Our results are in accordance with observations from other countries, and indicate that the use of joint replacements in RA has decreased dramatically. Our data suggest that effective medical therapy is the most likely explanation for this favorable development.

Improving healthcare consumer effectiveness: an Animated, Self-serve, Web-based Research Tool (ANSWER) for people with early rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

People with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should use DMARDs (disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) within the first three months of symptoms in order to prevent irreversible joint damage. However, recent studies report the delay in DMARD use ranges from 6.5 months to 11.5 months in Canada. While most health service delivery interventions are designed to improve the family physician's ability to refer to a rheumatologist and prescribe treatments, relatively little has been done to improve the delivery of credible, relevant, and user-friendly information for individuals to make treatment decisions. To address this care gap, the Animated, Self-serve, Web-based Research Tool (ANSWER) will be developed and evaluated to assist people in making decisions about the use of methotrexate, a type of DMARD. The objectives of this project are: 1) to develop ANSWER for people with early RA; and 2) to assess the extent to which ANSWER reduces people's decisional conflict about the use of methotrexate, improves their knowledge about RA, and improves their skills of being 'effective healthcare consumers'.

METHODS/DESIGN

Consistent with the International Patient Decision Aid Standards, the development process of ANSWER will involve: 1.) creating a storyline and scripts based on the best evidence on the use of methotrexate and other management options in RA, and the contextual factors that affect a patient's decision to use a treatment as found in ERAHSE; 2.) using an interactive design methodology to create, test, analyze and refine the ANSWER prototype; 3.) testing the content and user interface with health professionals and patients; and 4.) conducting a pilot study with 51 patients, who are diagnosed with RA in the past 12 months, to assess the extent to which ANSWER improves the quality of their decisions, knowledge and skills in being effective consumers.

DISCUSSION

We envision that the ANSWER will help accelerate the dissemination of knowledge and skills necessary for people with early RA to make informed choices about treatment and to manage their health. The latest in animation and online technology will ensure ANSWER fills a knowledge translation gap, focusing on the next generation of people living with RA.

Long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is recognized as a disease with a natural history of severe long-term outcomes, which appear to be improving at this time, as reported from many clinics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improved outcomes of many long-term consequences of inflammation such as joint deformity, functional declines, work disability, and early death have been reported in recent years.

SUMMARY

Therapies for RA are assessed in randomized clinical trials and in clinical care primarily according to measures of inflammatory activity, which may change considerably over days, weeks, and months. In usual clinical care, long-term consequences of the disease, which often require years of observation, can also be assessed. Data in published reports of both clinical trials and clinical care continue to include only a minority of all patients with RA. Further efforts are needed to promote collection of quantitative data in all patients with RA, at all visits in all clinical settings, to facilitate 'tight control' and better outcomes for all patients with RA.

Changing structure and resources in a rheumatology combined unit during 1977–1999

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to study the changing structure and resources in a rheumatism hospital during the period 1977-1999 when rheumatology care was decentralized and new treatment strategies were introduced.

METHODS

Data on hospital management and production were retrieved retrospectively.

RESULTS

The number of beds was stepwise reduced from 133 to 44 and the average length of stay declined from 48 to 16 days. The combined unit and multidisciplinary team organization was kept, ensuring the combined effort of rheumatologists, rheumasurgeons, registered nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and social workers. One-third of the total staff was rheumateam members in 1977 compared to one-half in 1999. The proportions of physicians and registered nurses increased while the proportion of physiotherapists was stable. The number of discharges remained relatively unchanged and the number of outpatient consultations increased. Inflammatory rheumatic diseases remained the largest diagnostic group of in- and outpatients. Hospitalized care was received primarily by patients with arthritis and spondylitis. Patients with vasculitis and diffuse disorders of connective tissue accounted for an increasing proportion of the outpatient clinic production. Surgical procedures became more prevalent. Since 1995 approximately 50 large joint replacements have been performed annually.

CONCLUSION

The length of stay declined and patient care was shifted towards the outpatient clinic. The multidisciplinary team was strengthened. More resources were dedicated to physician-led and nurse-dependent procedures, but physiotherapy and rehabilitation remained part of inpatient care throughout the period. The expertise concentrated on inflammatory rheumatic disorders. The modesty of the large joint replacement caseload may challenge decentralized care.

The good initial response to therapy with a combination of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is sustained over time: the eleven-year results of the Finnish rheumatoid arthritis combination therapy trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the evolution of functional and clinical outcomes over 11 years in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initially treated with a combination of 3 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or with a single DMARD.

METHODS

A cohort of 199 patients with early active RA were initially randomized to receive treatment with a combination of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine with prednisolone or treatment with a single DMARD (initially, sulfasalazine) with or without prednisolone. After 2 years, the drug treatment strategy became unrestricted, but still targeted remission. At 11 years, function was assessed with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and clinical outcomes were assessed with the modified Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) measure and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for remission.

RESULTS

At 11 years, 138 patients were assessed (68 in the combination-DMARD group and 70 in the single-DMARD group). The mean+/-SD HAQ scores were 0.34+/-0.54 in the combination-DMARD group and 0.38+/-0.58 in the single-DMARD group (P=0.88). Modified MDA was achieved by 63% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 51, 77) and by 43% (95% CI 32, 55) (P=0.016) of the combination-DMARD group and the single-DMARD group, respectively, and ACR remission by 37% (95% CI 26, 49) and by 19% (95% CI 11, 29) (P=0.017), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Initial therapy with a combination of DMARDs in early RA results in higher rates of patients achieving modified MDA and strict ACR remission even over the long term than initial single-DMARD therapy. Targeting remission with tight clinical controls results in good functional and clinical outcomes in most RA patients.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a global perspective on the use of antirheumatic drugs

Modern therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is based on knowledge of the severity of the natural history of the disease. RA patients are approached with early and aggressive treatment strategies, methotrexate as an anchor drug, biological targeted therapies in those with inadequate response to methotrexate, and “tight control,” aiming for remission and low disease activity according to quantitative monitoring. This chapter presents a rationale for current treatment strategies for RA with antirheumatic drugs, a review of published reports concerning treatments in clinical cohorts outside of clinical trials, and current treatments at 61 sites in 21 countries in the QUEST-RA database.

Response-Driven Combination Therapy with Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Can Achieve High Response Rates in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis with Minimal Glucocorticoid and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of combination therapy in recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with dose adjustments determined by response, in a clinic setting over 3 years.

METHODS

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive patients with RA of median duration of 12 weeks (n = 61) attending an early arthritis clinic were treated with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and fish oil. Dosage adjustments and additions of further DMARDs were contingent on response to therapy and tolerance. Outcome measures for efficacy were Disease Activity Score (DAS28), clinical remission, and modified Sharp radiographic score and for safety, adverse events, and DMARD withdrawal.

RESULTS

At baseline, subjects had at least moderately active disease (mean +/- SD DAS28 was 5.3 +/- 1.1), impaired function as measured by the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) (0.9 +/- 0.5), and 37% had bone erosions. By 3 months, 29% were in remission; this increased to 54% at 3 years. The greatest fall in DAS28 and improvement in mHAQ scores occurred in the first 12 months. Erosions were detected in 62% at 3 years. The mean dose of parenteral glucocorticoid was equivalent to 0.1 mg/d of prednisolone. After 3 years, 48% remained on triple therapy; fish oil was consumed by 75% of patients, and 21% used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Gastrointestinal intolerance was the most frequent unwanted event (leading to DMARD withdrawal in 17 patients). Sulfasalazine was most frequently withdrawn (30%).

CONCLUSION

This implementation study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of combination therapy with inexpensive DMARDs, fish oil, and minimal glucocorticoid use, in routine clinical practice using predefined rules for dosage adjustment.

Physical disability due to musculoskeletal conditions

Musculoskeletal conditions (MSC) are common throughout the world and their impact on individuals is diverse and manifold. Knowledge of the determinants for disability and of strategies for prevention and rehabilitation management according to the scientific evidence is critical for reducing the burden of MSC. The first section of this chapter reviews the evidence for common determinants of functioning and disability in patients with MSC. We have focussed on environmental factors (EF) and personal factors (PF) and have structured them according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. The second section discusses prevention strategies. Generally, prevention needs to address those EF and PF that were presented in the first section. The final section describes modern principles of rehabilitation and reviews the evidence for specific rehabilitation interventions.

Stable occurrence of knee and hip total joint replacement in Central Finland between 1986 and 2003: an indication of improved long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Total joint replacement (TJR) surgery is an important severe long-term outcome of rheumatoid arthritis, but relatively little is known about changes of its incidence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over the past two decades.

METHODS

A population-based, retrospective, incidence case review was conducted to analyse the frequency of primary TJR surgery of the knee and hip in all patients, and specifically in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Central Finland between 1986 and 2003. Patients with TJR surgery of the knee and hip were identified in hospital databases over the 18-year period. Age-standardised incidence rate ratios for the primary TJR of the knee and hip were calculated, stratified to sex and diagnosis, with 1986 as the reference value.

RESULTS

In patients without rheumatoid arthritis the age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (with 95% CI) for TJR of the knee increased 9.8-fold from 1986 to 2003 in women and men, and for TJR of the hip 1.8-fold in women and 2-fold in men. By contrast, no meaningful change was seen over this period, in age-adjusted incidence rate ratios for TJR of the knee or hip in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 in 2003 compared with 1986.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of TJR surgery has increased 2-10-fold in patients without rheumatoid arthritis patients, associated with an ageing population, but has not increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis between 1986 and 2003. These data are consistent with emerging evidence that long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis have improved substantially, even before the availability of biological agents.

Changes in Health Assessment Questionnaire disability scores over five years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with the general population

OBJECTIVE

To analyze longitudinal data over 5 years for changes in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and age- and sex-matched controls from the general population.

METHODS

In 2000 and 2005, identical self-report questionnaires were mailed to a cohort of patients with RA and control cohort from the community. The questionnaire included the HAQ, which was used to assess functional status. Changes in HAQ scores over 5 years were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 2000, 73% of 1,495 patients with RA and 77% of 2,000 general population controls responded to the questionnaire. In 2005, 84% of 2,022 patients with RA and 77% of 1,817 controls responded. A total of 863 patients with RA and 1,176 community controls responded in both 2000 and 2005 and were included in the analyses. Mean baseline HAQ scores were significantly higher in patients with RA than in controls (0.71 versus 0.17; P < 0.001). Over 5 years, the HAQ scores increased by 0.01 units per year in both the RA cohort and the community population; in both cohorts, the net change was primarily attributable to individuals over age 70 years. Changes in HAQ scores were similar in patients and controls who had low HAQ scores at baseline. Female patients with baseline HAQ scores of >or=0.5 had less potential for improvement than did controls. Among subjects in both groups who had HAQ scores >2, death was a common outcome over the next 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Currently, progression of functional disability among patients with RA and among persons in the general population is largely explained by the aging process. Our results showing stable function scores over 5 years in most patients with RA who are younger than age 70 years provide further evidence of improved status of RA patients today compared with the major declines observed in previous decades.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Several treatment strategies have proven value in the amelioration of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the optimal strategy for preventing long-term joint damage and functional decline is unclear. We undertook this study to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of 4 different treatment strategies, with intense monitoring in all patients.

METHODS

In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, 508 patients were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment strategies: sequential disease-modifying antirheumatic drug monotherapy (group 1), step-up combination therapy (group 2), initial combination therapy with tapered high-dose prednisone (group 3), and initial combination therapy with the tumor necrosis factor antagonist infliximab (group 4). Treatment adjustments were made every 3 months in an effort to obtain low disease activity (a Disease Activity Score in 44 joints of < or =2.4).

RESULTS

Initial combination therapy including either prednisone (group 3) or infliximab (group 4) resulted in earlier functional improvement than did sequential monotherapy (group 1) and step-up combination therapy (group 2), with mean scores at 3 months on the Dutch version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (D-HAQ) of 1.0 in groups 1 and 2 and 0.6 in groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.001). After 1 year, mean D-HAQ scores were 0.7 in groups 1 and 2 and 0.5 in groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.009). The median increases in total Sharp/Van der Heijde radiographic joint score were 2.0, 2.5, 1.0, and 0.5 in groups 1-4, respectively (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the number of adverse events and withdrawals between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with early RA, initial combination therapy including either prednisone or infliximab resulted in earlier functional improvement and less radiographic damage after 1 year than did sequential monotherapy or step-up combination therapy.

Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Early Arthritis

This article reviews the use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Finnish early RA cohorts are used as examples of how early and active treatment strategies have improved over time with increasing variety of available DMARDs. Therapy goals of early RA include remission to prevent severe long-term outcomes of RA. Remission can be achieved in a third of patients with early RA using a combination of conventional DMARDs, including methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and prednisolone. Of patients with early RA, 20% to 30% do not improve enough with conventional treatments and should be identified at early phases to consider institution of biologic agents.

The Effectiveness of Methotrexate for the Escape by Salazosulfapyridine

Although disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the selection of agents in the case of relapse (escape phenomenon) lacks clear-cut standards. We compared the effectiveness in a salazosulfapyridine and then methotrexate (SASP-->MTX) group with that in the mothotrexate (SASP+MTX) group after escape phenomenon expression in C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) data. Outpatients of the Matsubara Mayflower Hospital with a history of DMARD administration during the 4 years prior to May 2003 were studied. The CRP level in the SASP-->MTX group (n=8) after the escape phenomenon expression showed a decline after 3 months, but no decline was seen even after 3 months the two in the CRP level in the SASP+MTX group (n=10). However, the difference between groups was not significant. The fluctuation in ESR was similar to that in CRP. However, ESR was significantly lower in the SASP-->MTX group 20 weeks after escape phenomenon expression. In evaluating treatment effectiveness after escape phenomenon expression in each group, SASP-->MTX was effective in 10 and SASP+MTX in 7 patients. Side effects necessitated cessation of treatment in 1 patient in the SASP-->MTX group. Treatment continued in 4 patients in the SASP-->MTX group and 2 in the SASP+MTX group, even though side effects occurred. It should be borne in mind that combination therapy often has greater clinical benefit than single agent therapy but not always.

The Examination of the Escape Phenomenon of the Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

Although disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the selection of agents in the case of relapse (escape phenomenon) lacks clear-cut standards. Therefore we investigated the rate and conditions of escape as well as the agents used after escapes had occurred. Outpatients of the Matsubara Mayflower Hospital with a history of DMARD administration during the 4 years prior to May 2003 were studied. Those receiving salazosulfapyridine (SASP) had a high escape rate and those receiving methotrexate (MTX) and bucillamine (BC) had a low rate. The continuous duration of administration was long for MTX and BC, but short for sodium aurothiomalate (GST). BC and Actarit (AR) gradually elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). In patients receiving SASP and MTX, a high level of CRP and high ESR was seen 2 months prior to the occurrence of escape and remained unchanged after escape. With respect to the agents used after escape, SASP and BC were substituted with other DMARDs. A combination with other DMARDs was usually administered to patients who had been receiving MTX. Taken together, the present results clarified the characteristics of DMARD escape and will contribute to the appropriate pharmacotherapy for RA.

Modelling cost effectiveness and cost utility of sequential DMARD therapy including leflunomide for rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: II. The contribution of leflunomide to efficiency

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the 3-year incremental cost effectiveness and cost utility of introducing leflunomide into sequential therapy, consisting of the most frequently used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in specialised, i.e. rheumatological, care in Germany.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The analysis was conducted from the societal perspective in Germany using an existing 3-year simulation model, which was adapted to the German healthcare system after secondary analysis of relevant publications and data. DMARD sequences including leflunomide were compared with those excluding leflunomide. Costs comprised direct costs incurred by treatment and indirect costs incurred by loss of productivity (sick leave and premature retirement) of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Effectiveness parameters were given by response years gained (RYGs) according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for 20%, 50% and 70% improvement (ACR20/50/70RYGs) and by QALYs gained (QALYGs). Costs, effects and QALYs were discounted by 5% per annum. In the base-case analysis, average values of costs, response years and QALYs were applied. Costs were in 1998-2001 values (euro 1 approximately equal to $US 0.91, average of the period from the year 2000 through 2001).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

After 3 years, adding leflunomide was less costly and more effective than the strategy excluding leflunomide when total (direct and indirect) costs were considered. There were savings of euro 271,777 and 8.1, 4.3, 5.1 and 4.9 ACR20RYGs, ACR50RYGs, ACR70RYGs and QALYGs per 100 patients, respectively, obtained through adding leflunomide. Focusing on direct costs, adding leflunomide was more costly and more effective compared with excluding leflunomide, with an incremental cost effectiveness of euro 5004 per ACR20RYG, euro 9535 per ACR50RYG, euro 7996 per ACR70RYG, and an incremental cost utility of euro8301 per QALYG, after 3 years. The robustness of the results was shown in comprehensive sensitivity analyses. In the analysis of extremes, different combinations of the limits of cost, effectiveness and utility parameters were investigated. Adding leflunomide to sequential DMARD therapy remained dominant in 79% of the possible cases, i.e. was less costly and more effective than the strategy excluding leflunomide. Focusing on direct costs, adding leflunomide became dominant in 29% and remained more costly and more effective in 50% of possible cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests, with its underlying data and assumptions, that having leflunomide as an additional option in a DMARD treatment sequence extends the time patients benefit from DMARD therapy at reasonable additional direct costs. Adding leflunomide may even be cost saving when total (direct and indirect) costs are considered. As data on DMARD effectiveness were extracted from the results of clinical trials, real-world data from observational studies would be needed to corroborate the findings of the present analysis.

Gaps in care for rheumatoid arthritis: A population study

OBJECTIVE

Treatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) now recommend early, aggressive, and persistent use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to prevent joint damage in all people with active inflammation, and evaluation by a rheumatologist, when possible. This research assesses whether care for RA, at a population level, is consistent with current treatment guidelines.

METHODS

Using administrative billing data from the Ministry of Health in 1996-2000, all prevalent RA cases in British Columbia, Canada were identified. Data were obtained on all medications and all provincially-funded health care services.

RESULTS

We identified 27,710 RA cases, yielding a prevalence rate of 0.76%, consistent with epidemiologic studies. DMARD use was inappropriately low. Only 43% of the entire RA cohort received a DMARD at least once over 5 years, and 35% over 2 years. When used, DMARDs were started in a timely fashion, but were not used consistently. Care by a rheumatologist increased DMARD use 31-fold. Yet, only 48% and 34% saw a rheumatologist over 5 and 2 years, respectively. DMARD use was significantly more frequent, persistent, and more often used as combination therapy with continuous rheumatologist care. DMARDs were used by 84% and 73%, 40%, and 10% of people followed by rheumatologists continuously and intermittently, internists, and family physicians, respectively (P < 0.001). NSAID use, physiotherapy, and orthopedic surgeries were similar across these 4 care groups.

CONCLUSION

RA care in the British Columbia population was not consistent with current treatment guidelines. Efforts to educate family physicians and consumers about the shift in RA treatment paradigms and to improve access to rheumatologists are needed.

Modelling cost effectiveness and cost utility of sequential DMARD therapy including leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: I. Selected DMARDs and patient-related costs

OBJECTIVE

To quantify direct costs of medication and cost of illness (according to functional capacity) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany, allowing further use in a health economic evaluation of sequential therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in specialised, i.e. rheumatological, care in Germany.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The analysis was conducted from the societal perspective in Germany using a modelling approach, which was based on secondary analysis of existing data and on data from a sample of 583 patients from the German rheumatological database of 1998. Functional capacity was defined by the Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (HFAQ) scores. Costs were calculated from resources utilised and patients' work capacity. Direct costs consisted of outpatient medical services, inpatient treatment, long-term care and rehabilitation treatment. Indirect costs incurred by sick leave and premature retirement were quantified according to the human-capital approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

Average total direct costs (year 1998-2001 values) per patient per year for continuous treatment with the selected DMARDs comprising costs for drugs, monitoring and treatment of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were highest for intramuscular gold (sodium aurothiomalate) [euro 2106 (euro 1 approximately equal to $US 0.91; average of the period from 2000 through 2001)] followed by leflunomide (euro 2010), azathioprine (euro 1878), sulfasalazine (euro 1190), oral methotrexate (euro 708), and lowest for the antimalarials chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine (euro 684). There were additional yearly costs for RA-related non-DMARD medication of euro 554 per patient, including management of ADRs. Mean cost of illness (year 1998 values) excluding medication cost amounted to euro 17,868 per RA patient per year. Annual costs increased with increasing disability, i.e. decreasing functional capacity, of RA patients from euro 6029 per patient with more than 94% of functional capacity to euro 28,509 per patient with <20% of functional capacity. In general, there was a predominance of indirect costs in each of the categories of functional capacity, ranging between 74% and 87% of total (direct and indirect) annual costs per RA patient. Annual direct costs increased from euro 811 to euro 7438 per patient with increasing disability. Inpatient treatment was the predominant component of direct costs. Patients in the worst category (<20%) of function experienced hospital costs that were 6.5 times higher than those of patients in the best category (>94%).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the data presented it can be concluded that the results of this investigation are typical for patients in rheumatological care in Germany and can therefore be used in a health economic analysis of different DMARD sequences aimed at changing disease progression over time.

Predictive factors of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Work disability-a common outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-is a societal (for example, financial costs) and individual problem (for example, loss of status, income, social support, and distraction from pain and distress). Until now, factors that predict work disability in RA have not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine predictive factors of work disability in RA as reported in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in Cinahl (1988-2004), Embase (1988-2004), and Medline (1989-2004) was followed by the application of two sets of criteria related to: (a) methodological quality, and (b) measurement of the predictive factor. Based on the quality and the consistency of the findings, a rating system was used to assess the level of evidence for each predictive factor.

RESULTS

Nineteen publications (17 cohorts) were identified, of which 13 met the general methodological quality criteria. Results provided strong evidence that physical job demands, low functional capacity, old age, and low education predict work disability in RA. Remarkably, biomedical variables did not consistently predict work disability. Moreover, owing to the lack of high quality studies no evidence was found for personal factors such as coping style, and work environmental factors such as work autonomy, support, work adjustments that are presumed crucial in the work disablement process.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that work disability in RA is a biopsychosocially determined misfit between individual capability and work demands.

"The rheumatologist can see you now": Successful implementation of an advanced access model in a rheumatology practice

OBJECTIVE

To provide rheumatologic care to patients in a timely and patient-centered manner.

METHODS

We developed and implemented processes to measure and help eliminate backlog, created access time for same-day patients, and retooled the appointments process to be more efficient and patient focused. In addition, we developed a protocol to be used by our primary care colleagues to care for osteoarthritis of the knee in a standardized manner.

RESULTS

The third available rheumatology appointment fell from about 60 days to <2 days. Cancellations fell from 40% to <20%. Patient satisfaction measures (composite score, physician score, and accessibility score) improved significantly. The number of new patients seen for knee osteoarthritis decreased by 6.7%, whereas the number of new rheumatoid arthritis referrals increased by 50.4%. Financial performance improved as well.

CONCLUSIONS

This advanced access model in a busy academic rheumatology practice demonstrated considerable improvement in access, patient satisfaction, and finances. Using a team approach, we are now able to give the patient the rheumatologic care they want and need at a time they want and need it.

A home-based two-year strength training period in early rheumatoid arthritis led to good long-term compliance: a five-year followup

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a 2-year home-based strength-training program on physical function in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after a subsequent 3-year followup.

METHODS

Seventy patients with early RA were randomized to perform either strength training (experimental group [EG]) or range-of-motion exercises (control group [CG]). Maximal strength values were recorded by dynamometers. The Modified Disease Activity Score (DAS28), pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), walking speed, and stair-climbing speed were also measured.

RESULTS

The maximum strength of assessed muscle groups increased by 19-59% in the EG during the training period and remained at the reached level throughout the subsequent 3 years. Muscle strength improved in the CG by 1-31%, but less compared with the EG. During the 2-year training period, DAS28 decreased by 50% and 45% and pain by 67% and 39% in the EG and CG, respectively. The differences in muscle strength, DAS28, and HAQ were significantly in favor of the EG both at the 2-year and 5-year followup assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

The improvements achieved during the 2-year strength-training period were sustained for 3 years in patients with early RA.

Normative values for the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index: Benchmarking disability in the general population

OBJECTIVE

The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI) has been commonly used in rheumatology to quantify functional disability in patient groups, but current general population values of this index are not available. This study was undertaken to establish normative values for the HAQ DI in a general population and to analyze its correlates.

METHODS

The HAQ DI (range of scores 0-3) was measured in a random sample of 1,530 adults in the Central Finland District. Prevalence rates of disability by strata of age, sex, education level, body mass index (BMI), and health behaviors (including smoking and exercise habits) were calculated. Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient and ordinary least squares regression were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

The estimated population mean HAQ DI was 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.22-0.28), and 32% of respondents had at least some disability. Both for men and for women, functional disability increased exponentially with age. The HAQ DI was correlated with pain (r = 0.58) and global self assessment (r = 0.61). The prevalence of disability decreased with increasing number of years of education, lower BMI, and increasing frequency of physical exercise.

CONCLUSION

Almost one-third of the general population has some functional disability. Functional disability is associated in part with lifestyle choices and increases with age in a nonlinear manner. The normative values of the HAQ DI that we have presented could be used as a reference benchmark for clinical and epidemiologic studies using this measure of disability.

Pursuit of optimal outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis

The aim of this review is to describe methods of quantifying disease activity and symptomatology and discuss treatment goals for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The benefits and limitations of existing therapeutic approaches, the importance of early therapy in preventing disease progression and the place of biologicals in early therapy will be discussed. Disease activity and symptomatology in RA are often measured using a set of core endpoints that incorporate pain, patient global assessment, physical disability, swollen joints, tender joints, acute phase reactants, physician global assessment and radiographic imaging of joints. Imaging of joints is the only means by which to measure the effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on the irreversible joint damage that occurs during RA. There is increasing evidence that this damage and its functional consequences occur early in the onset of disease. The consensus is that patients with RA should be treated with DMARDs earlier rather than later in the disease process. Remission, or a state of sustained response or low disease activity that is not damaging or disabling, is the ideal goal of therapy for RA, but formal criteria defining a state of remission need to be revised and, ideally, updated to include a radiographic component. Currently available DMARDs are limited in their ability to achieve early, sustained response or remission, by delayed onset of action, cumulative toxicity and lack of long-term therapeutic response. It is hoped that the emergence of novel DMARDs--targeted biological agents, such as anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-alpha)--will help to counteract such limitations and will allow early DMARD use to be adopted as standard practice in place of their use as a last resort therapy after failure of other treatment. One such biological agent, etanercept, has been shown to reduce radiographic disease progression and induce overall clinical response during the early stages of RA. It is significantly more effective and fast-acting than methotrexate, one of the most effective, commonly used DMARDs.

Reduction in long-term functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis from 1977 to 1998:a longitudinal study of 3035 patients

PURPOSE

If newer, more aggressive treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis are more effective, long-term outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis should be improving substantially. We therefore assessed trends in disability over time in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

We examined functional disability data from 3035 patients with rheumatoid arthritis whose disease onset was from 1977 to 1998. Disability data were collected semiannually with the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index. We then estimated average disability for each patient. We also computed mean disability for each calendar year by averaging the values from all patients in that year. We examined the relation of successive annual cohorts and subsequent disability, adjusting for age, sex, race, education, clinical center, disease duration, follow-up, and attrition. We used two regression approaches: ordinary and generalized least squares.

RESULTS

Average disability declined by about 2% to 3% per calendar year of disease onset (2.7% to 2.8% per year [P <0.001] in univariable models and 2.0% to 2.1% per year [P <0.001] in multivariable models). This trend was consistent by age, sex, race, disease duration, clinical center, and baseline disability.

CONCLUSION

After accounting for potential confounders, average disability levels in rheumatoid arthritis have declined by approximately 40% in the 20+ years since 1977. This decline is consistent with a beneficial effect of the associated changes in treatment strategies.

Early and extensive erosiveness in peripheral joints predicts atlantoaxial subluxations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To study the prevalence of cervical spine subluxations and predictive factors for atlantoaxial subluxations (including anterior atlantoaxial subluxation and atlantoaxial impaction, i.e., vertical subluxation) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were treated early and continuously with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for 8-13 years.

METHODS

Radiographs of the cervical spine were obtained in 103 of 110 patients (the 110 surviving patients of the original 135-patient cohort) at their 8-13-year followup visits. The prevalence of cervical spine subluxations was determined. Demographic variables and the first 5-year serial data concerning disease course were analyzed in a logistic regression model to find predictive factors for atlantoaxial subluxations.

RESULTS

Atlantoaxial subluxations were found in 14 patients (14%), and 5 patients (5%) had subaxial subluxations. Older age at baseline, greater disease activity during the first 5 years, and early erosiveness in peripheral joints predicted the development of atlantoaxial subluxations. Patients who had >or=10% of the maximum possible radiographic damage (by Larsen score) in peripheral joints at 5 years were 15.9 times more likely to develop atlantoaxial subluxations at 8-13 years than patients whose peripheral joint damage remained <10% of the maximum.

CONCLUSION

Compared with historical control RA cohorts, a lower prevalence of cervical spine destruction was found in the present group of patients. Rapid erosiveness in peripheral joints was the best predictor for atlantoaxial subluxations. Extensive erosiveness in peripheral joints should alert rheumatologists to the possible development of atlantoaxial subluxations in patients with RA.

Were the patterns of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis during 1977-1992 consistent with modern clinical guidelines?

OBJECTIVE

Quality assessment of the long-term treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Treatment patterns in a cohort of 70 local and 77 distant RA patients during 1977-1992 were reviewed retrospectively and compared to modern clinical guidelines.

RESULTS

In 1977 disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were given to 62% of the new, hospitalised patients, systemic corticosteroids to 7%, and corticosteroid joint injections to 24%. Patients with short disease duration and/or serious disease were selected for DMARD-treatment. Rheumasurgery was performed on 21%. During follow-up of local patients 54% were recorded with DMARDs for a mean duration of 29 months; approximately 1/5 of the follow-up period. Methotrexate was used infrequently. Local and systemic corticosteroids were recorded in approximately 20%. Rheumasurgery, predominantly non-prosthetic, was performed on 27%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early and serious disease were selected for DMARD-therapy, but the treatment duration was too short for modern requirements. Pharmaceutical and surgical treatment patterns were otherwise mainly consistent with present guidelines.

Combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

It has become clear that early suppression of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity is important in preventing progressive joint destruction and functional decline. To achieve this goal, many rheumatologists today advocate a more aggressive approach, using combinations of classic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-often including methotrexate-or new drugs. During the last 2 years, the combination of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and prednisolone has been demonstrated to be more beneficial than monotherapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, the superior efficacy of the combination of new tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking agents plus methotrexate to methotrexate alone in patients with chronic disease is very promising. Most studies of combination therapy focus on the efficacy of a combination compared with monotherapy, rather than on the efficacy of a treatment strategy. Although these studies of combination therapy provide useful information about the possible synergistic action of combinations of drugs, many questions remain unanswered, and studies evaluating different treatment strategies are needed before a new approach can be suggested.

How can the risk of long-term consequences of rheumatoid arthritis be reduced?

The long-term natural history of rheumatoid arthritis includes early radiographic damage and progression, severe functional declines, work disability and increased mortality rates. Emerging evidence suggests that this natural history may be favourably affected by disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), which slow the radiographic progression and functional decline. It is necessary to document both the efficacy of these drugs in randomized controlled clinical trials and their long-term effectiveness in clinical observational studies. Although a 20% improvement in inflammatory measures in the American College of Rheumatology Core Data Set (ACR20) distinguishes DMARDs from placebo in clinical trials, it is not clear that a control of inflammation at this level, or even at 50%, is sufficient to prevent long-term damage. There is limited financial support for long-term observational studies, which depend on data from the clinical experience of rheumatologists. Quantitative databases from clinical care, can be developed to document long-term outcomes in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis to include additional physical, radiographic, laboratory and patient questionnaire quantitative data. Patient self-report questionnaires appear to provide the least expensive and most effective measures toward this goal.