Trust in the attending rheumatologist, health-related hope, and medication adherence among Japanese systemic lupus erythematosus patients

A survey of patient-physician communication regarding treatment prospects and goal setting in the management of major depressive disorder in Japan

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and debilitating cause of disability worldwide. Recently, it has been suggested that individualized goal setting may play a role in patient-centered recovery. This study aimed to survey the landscape of patient-physician communication around goal setting for MDD treatment, as well as understand whether goal setting using the SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time-bound) framework is associated with positive treatment indicators in MDD.

METHODS

Patients in Japan (≥ 18 years of age) who self-reported a verified MDD diagnosis were eligible to complete a self-administered survey through the Personal Health Record service, a web-based smartphone app. Patients were asked about whether they communicated with physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. A 'SMART-Goal score' tool was developed to evaluate patient goals against the five SMART criteria. Treatment satisfaction scores and scores on the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale Short Version (TRUST) were assessed as indicators of outcomes in this study. Descriptive questions were used to explore patients' perceptions of goal setting.

RESULTS

In total, 466 patients were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The majority (70.0%) reported communicating with their physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. These patients (Com + group) had a median (Q1, Q3) TRUST score of 70.0 (60.0, 80.0), compared with 50.0 (40.0, 70.0) in patients who reported an absence of communication (Com - group). Median (Q1, Q3) treatment satisfaction scores were 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) and 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) for the Com + and Com - groups, respectively. In high SMART-Goal scoring groups, approximately 75% of patients exceeded the overall median scores for TRUST (70.0) or treatment satisfaction (5.0) reported for the Com + group; only 25% of patients in low SMART-Goal scoring groups achieved the same in either measure. Most patients (89.3%) who set goals recommended goal setting.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study suggests that communication between patients and physicians regarding goal setting in MDD treatment may be associated with positive patient perceptions of treatment. High-quality SMART goal setting also appears to have positive aspects for patients with MDD, which may in turn affect treatment outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000050370) on 17 February 2023.

Effect of Shared Decision-Making on Trust in Physicians in the Management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The Trust Measurement for Physicians and Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have explored whether the involvement of patients in shared decision-making (SDM) is beneficial to the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between patient participation in SDM and their trust in physicians using data from the Trust Measurement in Physicians and Patients With SLE (TRUMP2-SLE) study.

METHODS

Data regarding the nine-item Japanese version of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) scores, Trust in Physician Scale (TIPS) scores, and Abbreviated Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale (A-WFPTS) scores for interpersonal trust in a physician and trust in the medical profession were collected from patients with SLE who visited the outpatient clinics of five facilities in Japan through a self-administered questionnaire. The relationships among these scores were analyzed by general linear models with cluster-robust variance.

RESULTS

This study included 433 patients with SLE. The median baseline TIPS and A-WFPTS (attending physician version) scores were 82 (73-93) and 80 (70-95), respectively. A higher baseline SDM-Q-9 score was correlated with an increase in the TIPS score at one year (coefficient per 10-point [pt] increase, 0.94 pts, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-1.72). A higher baseline SDM-Q-9 score was correlated with a higher A-WFPTS score for interpersonal trust (coefficient per 10-pt increase, 2.20 pts, 95% CI 1.44-2.96). The baseline SDM-Q-9 score was also correlated with an increase in the general physician version of the A-WFPTS score at one year (coefficient per 10-pt increase, 1.29 pts, 95% CI 0.41-2.18).

CONCLUSION

Engagement of patients with SLE in SDM elevates their trust in the attending physicians and health care providers, potentially enhancing doctor-patient relationships and overall health care trust.

Association between discontinuity of care and patient trust in the usual rheumatologist among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Patient trust plays a central role in the patient-physician relationship. This study aimed to determine whether the number of outpatient visits with a covering rheumatologist is associated with patient trust in their usual rheumatologist.

METHODS

Japanese adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who met the 1997 revised classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology and had outpatient visits with a covering rheumatologist in the past year were included. We used the 11-item Japanese version of the modified Trust in Physician Scale (range 0-100) to assess patient trust. A general linear model with cluster-robust variance estimation was used to evaluate the association between the number of outpatient visits with covering rheumatologists and the patient's trust in their usual rheumatologist.

RESULTS

Of the 515 enrolled participants, 421 patients with SLE were included in our analyses. Patients were divided into groups according to the number of outpatient visits with a covering rheumatologist in the past year as follows: no visits (59.9%; reference group), one to three visits (24.2%; low-frequency group), and four or more visits (15.9%; high-frequency group). The median Trust in Physician Scale score was 81.8 (interquartile range: 72.7-93.2). Both the low-frequency group (mean difference: -3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.93 to -0.80) and high-frequency group (mean difference: -4.17; 95% CI -7.77 to -0.58) exhibited lower trust in their usual rheumatologist.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that the number of outpatient visits with a covering rheumatologist was associated with lower trust in a patient's usual rheumatologist.

Association between health-related hope and distress from restrictions in chronic kidney disease and dialysis

BACKGROUND

In chronic kidney disease (CKD), the durability of patient adherence to fluid and dietary restrictions may depend on the degree to which they have hope that they will enjoy life. Previous cross-sectional studies have shown that higher hope was associated with lower distress from fluid and dietary restrictions and better adherence in the short term. In this study, we aimed to examine the long-term relationship of hope with distress from fluid and dietary restrictions.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study included 444 patients with CKD undergoing dialysis in one of five Japanese nephrology centers. Hope as a predictor was measured using an 18-item health-related hope scale. Outcomes were two-item measures of distress from fluid and dietary intake restrictions using the Japanese version of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form, Version 1.3 (higher scores indicate lower levels of distress). Multivariate linear mixed models were used to estimate the association of baseline health-related hope with distress from fluid and dietary restrictions at baseline and follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 67 years, and 31.1% of them were females. In total, 124, 98, and 222 had non-dialysis CKD, peritoneal dialysis, and hemodialysis, respectively. Higher levels of baseline health-related hope were associated with lower levels of distress from fluid restriction after one year (per 10-point increase, 2.6 points (95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 4.1)); whereas the baseline score was not associated with the distress from fluid restriction at 2 years. Similarly, higher levels of baseline health-related hope were associated with lower levels of distress from dietary restriction after one year (per 10-point increase, 2.0 points (95% confidence interval, 0.3 to 3.6)); whereas the baseline score was not associated with the distress from dietary restriction at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Health-related hope, regardless of depression, can potentially mitigate long-term distress from fluid and dietary restrictions in patients with a wide range of CKD severities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000054710.

The impact of hope levels on treatment adherence in psychiatric patients

PURPOSE

In this study, aimed to determine the status of hope and treatment adherence in psychiatric patients and the relationship between the two.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The sample of the study consisted of participants (n = 103) in a university hospital psychiatric clinic. Research data were collected using personal information form, Morisky treatment adherence scale and Herth Hope Index (HHI). Statistical analysis of the data was carried out with SPSS 22.0 program using descriptive tests, student t-test, one-way variance analysis, chi-square test and Spearman correlation analysis.

RESULTS

The average score of the patients' hope scale is 34.23 ± 9.59 and is above the intermediate level. 43.7 % of patients have low adherence with treatment. It was found that as patients' hope scores increased (r = -0.417) non-adherence with treatment decreased; as annual hospitalization increased non-adherence increased (r = 0.274); as the duration of disease increased score of hope (r = -0.271), non-adherence with therapy (r = 0.353) and annual hospitalization increased (r = 0.211) (p < .05). Among the patients who took part in the study, 36.9 % were diagnosed with bipolar disorder, 33.0 % with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, 20.4 % with depression. Patients with bipolar disorder had higher treatment non-adherence scores. It was determined that 29.1 % of the patients stopped taking medication thinking they had recovered and 28.2 % did not adhere to the treatment due to drug side effects.

CONCLUSION

The findings underscore the crucial role of hope in influencing treatment adherence among psychiatric patients. Clinicians should consider strategies to bolster hope as a potential avenue for improving adherence rates.

Effect of Attending Rheumatologists' Big 5 Personality Traits on Patient Trust in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The TRUMP2-SLE Project

OBJECTIVE

Differences in communication styles based on physicians' personality traits have been identified, particularly in primary care, and these physician-related factors can be important in building patient-physician trust. This study examined the effects of rheumatologists' personality traits on patients' trust in their attending rheumatologists.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included adult Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at 5 academic medical centers between June 2020 and August 2021. The exposures were the Big 5 personality traits (ie, extraversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability) of attending rheumatologists using the Japanese version of the 10-Item Personality Inventory scale (1-7 points each). The outcome was the patients' trust in their attending rheumatologist using the Japanese version of the 5-item Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale (0-100 points). A general linear model was fitted.

RESULTS

The study included 505 patients with a mean age of 46.8 years; 88.1% were women. Forty-three attending rheumatologists (mean age: 39.6 years; 23.3% female) were identified. After multivariable adjustment, higher extraversion and agreeableness were associated with higher trust (per 1-point increase, 3.76 points [95% CI 1.07-6.45] and 4.49 points [95% CI 1.74-7.24], respectively), and higher conscientiousness was associated with lower trust (per 1-point increase, -2.17 points [95% CI -3.31 to -1.03]).

CONCLUSION

Whereas higher extraversion and agreeableness of attending rheumatologists led to higher patient trust in their rheumatologist, overly high conscientiousness may lead to lower trust resulting from the physicians' demand of responsibility and adherence to instructions from patients with SLE.

Kidney involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: From the patient assessment to a tailored treatment

In the last few years, several studies have provided new evidence for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with lupus nephritis. Evidence showing dissociation between clinical and histological findings has prompted reevaluation of the role of the kidney biopsy as a tool for diagnosis and follow-up. In therapeutics, four immunosuppressive schemes now have supporting evidence for use as initial therapy. Current challenges include individualized selection of the best immunosuppressive regimen, an unmet need for non-invasive biomarkers of disease activity to inform treatment responses and guide subsequent therapy, holistic patient management in this complex, multisystem disease, and ultimately the development of more targeted therapies directed at specific effector pathways driving glomerular inflammation and damage in order to improve treatment response. In this communication, we review the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to lupus nephritis, as well as evaluation of response to therapy and disease control.

Promoting awareness of terminology related to unmet medical needs in context of rheumatic diseases in Japan: a systematic review for evaluating unmet medical needs

To optimize patient prognosis, patient needs, including unmet needs, should be adequately assessed. However, such needs are more challenging to report and, consequently, more likely to go unmet compared with the needs reported by physicians. We aimed to determine the appropriate direction of future research on unmet medical needs in rheumatic diseases in Japan by conducting a literature review. We searched PubMed and Web of Science using 23 terms linked to unmet medical needs for major rheumatic diseases in Japan. Further, we collected articles on health-related quality of life and investigated the scales used for assessment, as well as whether the terms "unmet needs" or "unmet medical needs" were used. We identified 949 papers on 10 diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, adult-onset Still's disease, antiphospholipid syndrome, mixed connective tissue disease, Takayasu arteritis, Sjögren's syndrome, and Behçet's disease; 25 of the 949 papers were selected for full-text review. Fifteen articles on five diseases were related to health-related quality of life. The term "unmet needs" was used in only one article. Six out of 15 studies used the 36-item short form survey, whereas the scales used in other studies differed. The optimal treatment plan determined by a physician may not necessarily align with the best interests of the patient. In clinical research, cross sectional and standardized indicators of health-related quality of life should be employed along with highly discretionary questionnaires to assess and optimize resource allocation in healthcare and simultaneously achieve patient-desired outcomes.