Intestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease: New kid on the block

Intestinal ultrasound is an emerging technique for diagnosing and monitoring patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is a simple, non-invasive, inexpensive, safe and reliable tool for monitoring patients with IBD. This technique has good diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of the extent and severity of IBD and its complications. The most commonly used parameters are bowel wall thickness, color Doppler flow, bowel wall stratification and peri-bowel inflammation. Various scoring systems have been developed utilizing the above parameters to monitor patients with IBD. It is a good tool to monitor response to therapy and follow-up for post-operative recurrence. Early response on intestinal ultrasound (IUS) predicts long-term clinical remission and mucosal healing in patients with Crohn's disease. In patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), the response to IUS can be assessed as early as two weeks. Recent data has emerged to predict the response to corticosteroids and colectomy in patients with acute severe UC. Point of care IUS in the outpatient clinic is an excellent tool to follow-up patients and guide clinical decision-making and has good acceptability among patients. It is an underutilized technique in spite of its appeal and the availability of evidence. Underutilization can be attributed to the lack of awareness, expertise and training centres. This review discusses the technical details and the evidence to support the use of IUS in IBD. We aim to increase awareness and use of intestinal ultrasound and build local expertise and data.

Treat to target in Crohn's disease: A practical guide for clinicians

A treat-to-target (T2T) approach applies the principles of early intervention and tight disease control to optimise long-term outcomes in Crohn's disease. The Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE)-II guidelines specify short, intermediate, and long-term treatment goals, documenting specific treatment targets to be achieved at each of these timepoints. Scheduled appraisal of Crohn's disease activity against pre-defined treatment targets at these timepoints remains central to determining whether current therapy should be continued or modified. Consensus treatment targets in Crohn's disease comprise combination clinical and patient-reported outcome remission, in conjunction with biomarker normalisation and endoscopic healing. Although the STRIDE-II guidelines endorse the pursuit of endoscopic healing, clinicians must consider that this may not always be appropriate, acceptable, or achievable in all patients. This underscores the need to engage patients at the outset in an effort to personalise care and individualise treatment targets. The use of non-invasive biomarkers such as faecal calprotectin in conjunction with cross-sectional imaging techniques, particularly intestinal ultrasound, holds great promise; as do emerging treatment targets such as transmural healing. Two randomised clinical trials, namely, CALM and STARDUST, have evaluated the efficacy of a T2T approach in achieving endoscopic endpoints in patients with Crohn's disease. Findings from these studies reflect that patient subgroups and Crohn's disease characteristics likely to benefit most from a T2T approach, remain to be clarified. Moreover, outside of clinical trials, data pertaining to the real-world effectiveness of a T2T approach remains scare, highlighting the need for pragmatic real-world studies. Despite the obvious promise of a T2T approach, a lack of guidance to support its integration into real-world clinical practice has the potential to limit its uptake. This highlights the need to describe strategies, processes, and models of care capable of supporting the integration and execution of a T2T approach in real-world clinical practice. Hence, this review seeks to examine the current and emerging literature to provide clinicians with practical guidance on how to incorporate the principles of T2T into routine clinical practice for the management of Crohn's disease.

Kidney involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: From the patient assessment to a tailored treatment

In the last few years, several studies have provided new evidence for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with lupus nephritis. Evidence showing dissociation between clinical and histological findings has prompted reevaluation of the role of the kidney biopsy as a tool for diagnosis and follow-up. In therapeutics, four immunosuppressive schemes now have supporting evidence for use as initial therapy. Current challenges include individualized selection of the best immunosuppressive regimen, an unmet need for non-invasive biomarkers of disease activity to inform treatment responses and guide subsequent therapy, holistic patient management in this complex, multisystem disease, and ultimately the development of more targeted therapies directed at specific effector pathways driving glomerular inflammation and damage in order to improve treatment response. In this communication, we review the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to lupus nephritis, as well as evaluation of response to therapy and disease control.

Personalized therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease being their most common presentations, comprise a spectrum of diverse disease phenotypes, exhibiting variable behaviors ranging from an indolent course to aggressive phenotypes that impact quality of life of these patients. The last two decades have been marked by the development of new medications (biological therapy and novel small molecules) with diverse mechanisms of action, which have revolutionized the management of IBD, thereby enhancing the quality of life for these patients. This landscape of multiple therapeutic options underscores the need to define which medication will benefit each patient the most and at what speed it should be started. The objective of this review is to present personalized approaches for patients with IBD, thus contributing to therapeutic management.

Treat-to-Target in Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the current evidence on the adoption of the treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in pediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD).

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent advances in the management of PRD have markedly increased the ability to achieve disease remission. Complete disease quiescence is regarded as the ideal therapeutic goal because its attainment leads to lesser long-term damage and physical disability, and to optimization of quality of life. Studies in adult rheumatic diseases have shown that patient outcomes are improved if complete suppression of the inflammatory process is aimed for by frequent adjustments of therapy according to quantitative indices. This approach, which underlies the T2T concept, has been applied in strategic trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Furthermore, recommendations for the T2T have been issued for RA and other adult rheumatic diseases. There is currently a growing interest for the introduction of T2T in PRD, and recommendations for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to target were promulgated. A similar initiative has been undertaken for childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Preliminary therapeutic studies have explored the T2T design in JIA. The T2T strategy is a modern therapeutic approach that holds the promise of improving the outcomes in patients with PRD.

Real-world efficacy of belimumab in achieving remission or low-disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effect of belimumab (BEL) on achieving low disease activity (LDA) and remission as an additive molecular-targeting agent to standard of care (SoC) in patients with SLE.

METHODS

Clinical information was retrospectively collected from patients with SLE who received BEL additive to SoC (BEL+SoC), and from patients treated with SoC alone as a control arm. Disease activity was measured by SLE-disease activity score (SLE-DAS). The proportion of patients in LDA and remission at 12 months was compared after propensity score matching. The factors contributing to LDA and remission achievement was identified by Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

BEL+SoC significantly reduced SLE-DAS at 6 months, with a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving LDA and remission at 12 months compared to SoC alone. The presence of arthritis at baseline was significantly associated with achieving LDA and remission. Additionally, both treatment groups experienced a significant reduction in daily glucocorticoid dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding BEL to SoC was beneficial for patients with arthritis, leading to higher proportion of achieving LDA and remission, while also reducing their glucocorticoid dose. Our results indicate the utility of BEL in a treat-to-target approach for SLE patients in a real-world setting.

Transmural remission characterized by high biologic concentrations demonstrates better prognosis in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

The importance and pathophysiology of transmural healing in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) remains to be verified. We aimed to examine the association between serum concentrations of biologics and transmural remission evaluated via magnetic resonance enterography (MRE).

METHODS

We enrolled patients with CD who received maintenance biologics 1 year after induction and prospectively followed up for at least 1 year after baseline laboratory, endoscopic and MRE examination. We evaluated the relationship between baseline factors including the presence of transmural remission and patient prognosis, as well as between serum concentrations and transmural remission.

RESULTS

We included 134 patients. Of them, 65, 31, 27, and 11 patients received infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab, respectively. Those who achieved transmural remission showed a lower risk of hospitalization and surgery than those who did not achieve remission (P < 0.01). Adjusted hazard ratios of transmural remission for predicting hospitalization and surgery was 0.11 and 0.02, respectively, which was lower than that of clinical remission, biochemical remission, and endoscopic remission. Regarding serum concentrations, the median concentration was higher in patients with transmural remission than in patients with transmural activity for all agents (P < 0.01 for infliximab, P = 0.04 for adalimumab, P < 0.01 for ustekinumab, P = 0.08 for vedolizumab).

CONCLUSIONS

Transmural remission was the best predictor for prognosis in CD patients who received maintenance biologic therapy. High drug concentration levels were associated with transmural remission confirmed via MRE.

Fluctuation and change of serum urate levels and flares in gout: results from the NOR-Gout study

A gout attack may evolve after a purine-rich diet or alcohol and after starting urate-lowering therapy (ULT). The relationships between fluctuation and change in serum urate (SU) with the occurrence of flares were investigated in this study. In the prospective NOR-Gout study, gout patients with increased SU and a recent flare were treated to target with ULT over 1 year, with follow-up at year 2 with SU and flare as outcomes. SU and flares were assessed at both monthly and 3-monthly intervals until target SU was reached. Fluctuation over periods and changes in SU between two time points were assessed and compared in patients with and without flares. At year 1, 186 patients completed follow-up (88.2%) and 173 (82.0%) at year 2. Mean age (SD) at baseline was 56.4 (13.7) years, disease duration was 7.8 (7.6) years, and 95.3% were men. The first-year SU fluctuation and change were related to flare occurrence during year 1 (both p < 0.05). High fluctuation with an absolute sum of all SU changes during the first 9 months was related to flares over 3-month periods (all p < 0.05), and high fluctuation during the first 3 months was related to flares in months 3-6 (p = 0.04). Monthly and high SU changes or again reaching higher SU levels > 360 µmol/l were not related to flares. Fluctuation and change in SU were related to flare occurrence during the first year of ULT, while changes between visits and reaching SU levels > 360 µmol/L were not related to flares. Key Points • Urate-lowering therapy seeks to achieve a treatment target and prevent gout flares, and changes in serum urate are related to gout flares. • Fluctuation and changes in serum urate were associated with gout flares, suggesting that fluctuation in serum urate is unfavourable during gout treatment. • During urate-lowering therapy in gout in clinical practice, fluctuation of serum urate, for example, due to lack of adherence, should be observed and avoided.

Tapering of biological treatment in autoinflammatory diseases: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Biological treatment and treat-to-target approaches guide the achievement of inactive disease and clinical remission in Autoinflammatory Diseases (AID). However, there is limited evidence addressing optimal tapering strategies and/or discontinuation of biological treatment in AID. This study evaluates available evidence of tapering biological treatment and explores key factors for successful tapering.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using the OVID platform (1990-08/2020). Bibliographic search of relevant reviews was also performed. Studies/case series (n ≥ 5) in AID patients aged ≤ 18 years with biological treatment providing information on tapering/treatment discontinuation were included. After quality assessment aggregated data were extracted and synthesized. Tapering strategies were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 6035 records were identified. Four papers were deemed high quality, all focused on systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) (1 open-label randomized trial, 2 prospective, 1 retrospective observational study). Biological treatment included anakinra (n = 2), canakinumab (n = 1) and tocilizumab (n = 1). Strategies in anakinra tapering included alternate-day regimen. Canakinumab tapering was performed randomized for dose reduction or interval prolongation, whereas tocilizumab was tapered by interval prolongation. Key factors identified included early start of biological treatment and sustained inactive disease.

CONCLUSION

Tapering of biological treatment after sustained inactive disease should be considered. Guidance for optimal strategies is limited. Future studies may leverage therapeutic drug monitoring in combination with pharmacometric modelling to further enhance personalized "taper-to-target" strategies respecting individual patients and diseases aspects.

One- and 2-year flare rates after treat-to-target and tight-control therapy of gout: results from the NOR-Gout study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the frequency and predictors of flares over 2 years during a treat-to-target strategy with urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in patients with gout.

METHODS

In the treat-to-target, tight control NOR-Gout study patients started ULT with escalating doses of allopurinol. Flares were recorded over 2 years. Baseline predictors of flares during months 9-12 in year 1 and during year 2 were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 211 patients included (mean age 56.4 years, disease duration 7.8 years, 95% males), 81% (150/186) of patients experienced at least one gout flare during the first year and 26% (45/173) during the second year. The highest frequency of flares in the first year was seen during months 3-6 (46.8% of patients). Baseline crystal depositions detected by ultrasound and by dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) were the only variables which predicted flares both during the first period of interest at months 9-12 (OR 1.033; 95% CI 1.010-1.057, and OR 1.056; 95% CI 1.007-1.108) and also in year 2. Baseline subcutaneous tophi (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.50-5.59) and prior use of colchicine at baseline (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.28-4.79) were independent predictors of flares during months 9-12, whereas self-efficacy for pain was a protective predictor (OR 0.98 per unit, 95% CI 0.964-0.996).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with gout, flares remain frequent during the first year of a treat-to-target ULT strategy, especially during months 3-6, but are much less frequent during year 2. Baseline crystal depositions predict flares over 2 years, supporting ULT early during disease course.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12618001372279.

Optical imaging compared to clinical examination in 484 rheumatoid arthritis patients: the Leeuwarden Handscan Registry

The Handscan is a novel objective optical imaging device for disease follow-up and management in rheumatoid arthritis patients. We aim to examine the association between the baseline outcomes of the Handscan, disease activity levels and joint swelling. The Handscan measures differences in laser light absorption between joints of fingers and wrists and adjacent reference tissue, indicating the presence or absence of inflammation. The device gives an optical spectral transmission (OST) index per joint. The average of these indices is represented in the total optical score (TOS). Associations between TOS and DAS28 at subject level and OST and swelling at joint level were examined. 484 RA patients were included. Compared to patients with high disease activity (defined by DAS28), TOS was significantly lower in patients with moderate (estimated coefficient B: - 7.09, P < 0.001), low disease activity (B: - 6.99, P < 0.001) and patients in remission (B: - 7.72, P < 0.001) but could not distinguish between the latter three disease states. TOS was significantly lower in females (B: - 3.2, P < 0.001). OST was significantly higher in swollen than non-swollen joints (B: 0.28, P < 0.001). TOS was significantly higher in patients with high disease activity than in those in remission or with low and moderate disease activity. The difference in TOS between males and females should be accounted for in the interpretation of this outcome. The OST at joint level discriminates swollen from non-swollen joints and could be a more promising tool than the overall optical activity reflected in TOS.

Expert recommendations on early diagnosis and referral of axial spondyloarthritis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Axial spondyloarthritis is a chronic inflammatory disorder that primarily involves the axial skeleton (sacroiliac joints and spine), causing stiffness, severe pain and fatigue. In some patients, definitive structural damage of sacroiliac joints is visible on imaging and is known as radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Some patients do not have a clear radiographic damage of the sacroiliac joints, and this subtype is known as non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Early diagnosis is important for reducing the risk of irreversible structural damage and disability. Management of axial spondyloarthritis is challenging in Saudi Arabia because of inadequate disease knowledge and the unavailability of local guidelines. Therefore, this expert consensus is intended to provide recommendations, including the referral pathway, the definition of remission and the treat-to-target approach, to all healthcare professionals for the management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. A Delphi technique of consensus was developed by involving an expert panel of 10 rheumatologists, 1 dermatologist and 1 general physician. The experts offered consensus-based recommendations based on a review of available scientific evidence and clinical experience for the referral, screening and management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

Gathering patients and rheumatologists' perceptions to improve outcomes in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic targets in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM) are based on the opinions of physicians/specialists, which may not reflect the main concerns of patients. The authors, therefore, assessed the outcome concerns of patients with IIM and compared them with the concerns of rheumatologists in order to develop an IIM outcome standard set.

METHODS

Ninety-three IIM patients, 51 rheumatologists, and one physiotherapist were invited to participate. An open questionnaire was initially applied. The top 10 answers were selected and applied in a multiple-choice questionnaire, inquiring about the top 3 major concerns. Answers were compared, and the agreement rate was calculated. Concerns were gathered in an IIM outcome standard set with validated measures.

RESULTS

The top three outcome concerns raised by patients were medication side effects/muscle weakness/prevention functionality loss. The top three concerns among rheumatologists were to prevent loss of functionality/to ensure the quality of life/to achieve disease remission. Other's outcomes concerns only pointed out by patients were muscle pain/diffuse pain/skin lesions/fatigue. The agreement rate between both groups was 41%. Assessment of these parameters guided the development of an IIM standard set which included Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Visual Analogue Scale/Manual Muscle Testing/fatigue and pain Global Visual Analogue Scale/Health Assessment Questionnaire/level of physical activity.

CONCLUSION

The authors propose a novel standard set to be pursued in IIM routine follow-up, which includes not only the main patients/rheumatologist outcome concerns but also additional important outcomes only indicated by patients. Future studies are necessary to confirm if this comprehensive approach will result in improved adherence and ultimately in better assistance.

[Current state, goals and quality standards of outpatient care in rheumatology: position paper of the Professional Association of German Rheumatologists (BDRh)]

Even in the era of modern guidelines, the treatment of rheumatic diseases is only as good as the framework of rheumatological care within which the treatment is carried out. The access to high-quality medical treatment for all patients is therefore essentially decisive for the prognosis of the patients. This article describes the current state of outpatient treatment in rheumatology and demonstrates which quality projects, such as treatment contracts, outpatient specialized medical treatment (ASV), digitalization and training as specialized rheumatological assistant (RFA), have been created in order to ensure the treatment of our patients. Furthermore, standards are defined that can guarantee a contemporary and guideline-conform treatment in outpatient rheumatological units. As an example it is an affirmation of the Professional Association of German Rheumatologists (BDRh) for ensuring optimal care for all rheumatology patients through early or emergency rheumatology clinics, treat to target, appropriate delegation of medical duties and diversification of treatment, thus an assurance of the quality and comprehensive treatment in rheumatology. The important topic of safeguarding the next generation of rheumatologists, which is indispensable for this, is also discussed.

Subclinical Treatment Targets in Rheumatology: Lessons from Randomized Clinical Trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis

In treat-to-target strategies, choosing the correct target is fundamental to success. The target should be associated with future good outcomes for the patient. Most rheumatic diseases are characterized by inflammation, affecting different tissues depending on the condition. Low-grade, subclinical inflammation is by definition not apparent on clinical examination, but may have significant long-term consequences for the individual. It has thus been debated whether targeting subclinical inflammation would improve long-term outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. The authors use rheumatoid arthritis as an example to describe and discuss the status of subclinical targets in treat-to-target strategies within rheumatology.

Treat to Target in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Pros, Cons, and Future Directions

Treat to target describes a management paradigm that involves choosing a clinically relevant target, assessment with validated measures at a prespecified frequency, and a change in therapy if the target is not met. Although guidelines recommend treating to target in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), ideal methods to reach this target remain controversial. This review focuses on background for a treat-to-target strategy in axSpA. Potential targets of treatment, association of targets with outcomes, evidence of treatment impact on outcomes, and how treat to target has been incorporated into treatment guidelines are discussed. Treat-to-target trials and the research agenda for studies in axSpA are discussed.

Treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis to target: what is the optimal target definition to reach all goals?

In 2018, an international Task Force formulated recommendations for treating Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) to target. The Task Force has not yet resolved three issues. The first issue is the lack of a single "best" target. The Task Force decided not to recommend the use of a specific instrument to assess inactive disease or remission. Recent studies underscore the use of a broad target definition. The second issue is the basic assumption that a treatment aggressively aimed at the target will have 'domino effects' on other treatment goals as well. Thus far, this assumption was not confirmed for pain, fatigue and stiffness. The third issue is shared decision-making, and the role of individual patient targets. Nowadays, patients and parents should have a more active role in choosing targets and their personal treatment goals. In our department the electronic medical records have been restructured in such a way that the patient's personal treatment goals with a target date appears on the front page. The visualization of their specific personal goals helps us to have meaningful discussions on the individualized treatment strategy and to share decisions. In conclusion, a joint treat to target (T2T) strategy is a promising approach for JIA. The Task Force formulated valuable overarching principles and a first version of recommendations. However, implementation of T2T needs to capture more than just inactive disease. Patients and parents should have an active role in choosing personal targets as well.

Treatment strategies are more important than drugs in the management of rheumatoid arthritis

The treatment of inflammatory arthritides has been changed dramatically in the past two decades with the introduction of the biological (b) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as well as the targeting synthetic (ts) DMARDs that can be used as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs. The concept of treat to target (T2T) and tight control monitoring of disease activity represents a therapeutic paradigm of modern rheumatology. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), this treatment approach has proven to be effective in many clinical trials and is now a well-established approach. The most common treatment strategies rely on the combination of csDMARDs (mainly methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine). This comes from different studies which compare the outcomes of combination therapies versus csDMARD monotherapy or versus methotrexate plus biologics in early RA patients. Here, we review the literature of the most important T2T studies for RA patients. The results showed that a tight control strategy appears to be more important than a specific drug to control RA. T2T approach aiming for remission or low disease activity can be achieved in early RA patients using less expensive drugs in comparison to newer drugs and this may need to be recognised in the future recommendations for the management of RA. KEY POINTS: • Tight-control and treat-to-target (T2T) strategies are the cornerstone in achieving remission or low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) • A plethora of clinical trials has confirmed the efficacy of csDMARDs when the tight-control and T2T strategies are applied • T2T and tight-control strategies are a less expensive option in comparison to newer drugs and may be recognised in the future recommendations for the management of RA. • Treatment decisions and strategies are more important than just the drugs.

Treat to Target: A Valid Concept for Management of Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis?

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are common inflammatory diseases of the elderly. They have variable clinical courses and are usually treated with glucocorticoids (GCs). Relapses are frequent in both conditions. Physicians should balance the tradeoff of treatment-related adverse events and risk of relapse. The ultimate goal of treatment is control of the disease while maintaining patient well-being. A treat-to-target approach may achieve the aim of controlling inflammation and preserving patient's functioning and quality of life, and would require pursuit and evaluation of clinical, laboratory, imaging, and structural targets to tackle the different manifestations of GCA and PMR.

Treat to Target in Axial Spondyloarthritis

This article discusses treat-to-target strategies in axial spondyloarthritis and current status. Treatment ranging from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to biologic and other disease-modifying drugs is discussed in the context of treat-to-target. The article explores evidence from landmark randomized, controlled trials and observational studies focusing on both radiographic and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. The feasibility of treat-to-target, as well as predictors of remission are addressed in line with existing evidence. Finally, issues around management principles and challenges, as well as unmet need in the field, are highlighted.

Treat to Target in Psoriatic Arthritis

A treat-to-target approach to psoriatic arthritis has emerged as a topic of interest following successful application of this treatment paradigm to rheumatoid arthritis. In psoriatic arthritis, this has been examined in one randomized trial to date showing benefits of a tight control treatment strategy over standard care. Nonetheless, international treatment recommendations have called for clinicians to aim for a target of remission or low disease activity, although little or no consensus exists on how to measure these targets. An ideal measure to define a treatment target should be able to address all the disease domains and preferences pertinent to an individual patient.

The "Treat to Target" Approach to Rheumatoid Arthritis

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has evolved significantly over the past decades. Therapeutic advances have made clinical remission a feasible goal. Systematic treatment approaches taking into account objective measures of disease activity ("treat-to-target"/"T2T") have been shown to result in better outcomes. This article reviews the latest information regarding T2T in rheumatoid arthritis, including a synopsis of the different disease activity scores available, new definitions of remission used in clinical trials and in routine clinical care, studies supporting a T2T approach, the role of imaging to guide treatment, and areas in which uncertainty remains.

Improving the quality of care for inflammatory bowel disease

Great strides have been achieved in the development of quality-of-care measures and standards for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) over the last decade. The central structural component of care in IBD revolves around the multidisciplinary team, which should be equipped with the necessary resources to operate and implement decisions. Process measures have been defined by interest groups and can be adapted into process tools for the delivery of care for various patient subgroups and clinical scenarios. The emerging treat-to-target approach to IBD management may be used to achieve optimal long-term and holistic patient-centred outcomes, such as survival, control of inflammation and disease progression, symptomatic remission, quality of life and complications. Other important quality-of-care outcome measures for IBD include disutility of care, healthcare utilization and other patient-reported outcomes such as nutritional status and impact of fistulae. The current challenge for healthcare providers and health systems is the integration of quality-of-care structures and processes into clinical practice, and the consistent delivery of updated evidence-based quality IBD care to various patient populations by individual health care providers. Finally, the awareness and appreciation for quality of care in IBD is increasing in Asia, and Asian healthcare institutions should be encouraged to take the lead in improving the quality of care in IBD.

Treat-to-target in Crohn's disease: Will transmural healing become a therapeutic endpoint?

Crohn's disease (CD) represents a chronic transmural inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract, which usually leads to structural damage and significant disability. Deep remission - defined by both clinical and endoscopic remission, signifying mucosal healing - represents the current endpoint in the treat-to-target strategy, significantly improving patients' long-term outcomes. Transmural healing (TH) could be a more effective target, but this possibility remains unclear. This narrative review aims to critically review and summarize the available literature relating TH to long-term outcomes, being the first of its kind and to the best of the author's knowledge. A systematic literature search (from inception to March 31 2018) was performed, using multiple databases, and identifying seven full-text manuscripts. In those studies, long-term favorable outcomes (≥ 52 wk) included sustained clinical remission, as well as fewer therapeutic changes, CD-related hospitalizations, and surgeries. Despite heterogeneous design and methodological limitations, six of the studies demonstrated that TH or intestinal healing (TH plus mucosal healing) were predictive for the aforementioned favorable outcomes. Therefore, TH may become a reasonable therapeutic target and be included in the concept of deep remission. Further prospective, well-designed, multicenter trials aiming to better define the role of TH in personalized therapy for CD and to determine the long-term influence of TH on bowel damage and disability are warranted.

Novel Concepts in Psoriatic Arthritis Management: Can We Treat to Target?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory spondyloarthritis that can cause progressive joint damage and irreversible disability. Advances in modern therapies, now mean a target of remission is an achievable goal in PsA. There is strong and consistent evidence that a treat-to-target (T2T) approach to PsA management results in better patient outcomes; however, the practicalities of incorporating this strategy into routine clinical practice remain a challenge. The heterogeneous nature of this condition and the need for validated outcome measures have to-date hampered consensus on a definition of remission. This review aims to summarise the current T2T research landscape in PsA and highlight potential roles for biomarkers and imaging advances in revolutionising the T2T concept.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a growing body of evidence to support the implementation of a T2T strategy, using a pre-defined target in PsA management, with significant benefits in disease outcome, physical function and quality of life. Whilst remission is the ultimately goal for PsA patients and their clinicians, further comparative studies of different treatment targets are needed to establish a widely acceptable definition of remission.

Capsule endoscopy: Current status and role in Crohn’s disease

Capsule endoscopy (CE) has proved to be an important non-invasive tool for diagnosis and monitoring Crohn’s disease patients. It has the advantage of excellent visualization of digestive tract mucosa, a good tolerability and safety in well-selected patients. The risk of retention can be diminished by good selection of patients using imaging techniques and by the use of patency capsule. The aim of a capsule examination is not only an early diagnosis but also a very good stratification of prognosis, thus directing the treatment strategy for either a step up or top-down approach and also permitting the optimization of the treatment depending on the findings. When symptoms and biomarkers point to a change in the disease’s activity we can either adjust the treatment directly as recommended in CALM study or choose in selected patients to visualize the digestive mucosa through a CE and take a decision afterwards. The appearance of the new capsule from Medtronic-the Pillcam Crohn’s might be an important step forward in diagnosis, evaluating disease extent, the severity of the disease, prognosis, management in a treat to target approach, with treatment modifications according to the data from CE examination. Serial examinations in the same patient can be compared and a more objective evaluation of the lesions modification from one exam to another can be performed. We present the latest developments and current status and evidence that in selected patients capsule can be a tool in a treat to target approach.

Ten years of follow-up data in psoriatic arthritis: results based on standardized monitoring of patients in an ordinary outpatient clinic in southern Norway

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy has been recommended for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and new treatment options have become available. There is a lack of data on PsA regarding any changes that may have occurred over these past years. Thus, the main aim of this study was to look for changes in clinical disease status and treatment in a PsA outpatient clinic population monitored over the period 2008 to 2017.

METHODS

Annual data collection included demographic data, laboratory (erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP)) and clinic measures of disease activity (e.g., 28 and 32 joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and modified Disease Activity index for Psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA)), evaluator's global assessment, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including for example measures of physical function, pain, and patient global assessment. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use was also registered.

RESULTS

In the PsA outpatient clinic population over the 10-year period (annual mean number of patients, 331) the mean (standard deviation) age was 58.4 (12.4) years, disease duration was 9.6 (7.9) years, 49.4% were female, and 17.6% were current smokers. From 2008 to 2017, no statistically significant increase in remission rates was seen for DAPSA (13.5% and 22.0%) or Boolean remission (6.6% and 8.9%), whereas a statistically significant increase was seen for DAS28-ESR (36.8% and 50.6%) and CDAI (20.0% and 29.6%), but not for the last 5 years (DAS28-ESR, 42.3% and 50.6%; CDAI, 27.9% and 29.6%). Furthermore, over the 10-year period no significant improvement for PROs and no significant change in the use of synthetic (annual mean 53.0%) and biologic DMARDs (annual mean 29.9%) was found.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that even in the biologic treatment era there is an unmet need for treating PsA patients to target remission. New treatment options and the development of more feasible and valid outcome measures for use in a T2T strategy in ordinary clinical practice may in the future to further improve clinical outcomes in PsA.

What Is the Evidence for Treat-to-Target Serum Urate in Gout?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Most current clinical guidelines for gout management advocate a treat-to-target serum urate approach, although notable differences exist. Serum urate is a rational target for gout treatment given the central role of urate in disease causality, its association with key outcomes and its practicality of use in clinical practice. This review analyses the evidence for this strategy in gout.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have confirmed the efficacy of urate-lowering therapy in achieving serum urate targets, both in trials using fixed doses and those applying a treat-to-target strategy. In a limited number of long-term studies (> 12-month duration), interventions that incorporate a treat-to-target serum urate approach have been shown to promote regression of tophi, reduce the frequency of gout flares and improve MRI-detected synovitis. A strong case can be made for a treat-to-target serum urate strategy in gout, supported by existing knowledge of disease pathophysiology, outcomes from urate-lowering therapy studies and emerging results of randomised strategy trials of sufficient duration.

Spanish consensus on treat to target for osteoporosis

To reach a Spanish expert consensus on a treat-to-target strategy in osteoporosis, a Delphi Consensus Study has been developed. Most of the experts (59.8%) were rheumatologist with a mean clinical experience of 21.3 years (SD 8.5). Consensus was achieved for 70% of the items. Therapeutic objectives, patient follow-up scheme, treatment failure criteria, and appropriate treatment choice for use in T2T strategy in Spain have been defined.

INTRODUCTION

The paper aims to achieve a Spanish expert consensus on a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in osteoporosis.

METHODS

A scientific committee led the project and was involved in expert panel identification and Delphi questionnaire development. Two Delphi rounds were completed. The first-round questionnaire included 24 items and assessed, using a seven-point Likert scale, the experts' wish (W) and prognosis (P) in 5 years for each topic (applicability, therapeutic objectives, patient follow-up, and possible treatment to be prescribed). Items for which there was no consensus in the first round were included in the second round. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement (somewhat/mostly/entirely agree) or disagreement (somewhat/mostly/entirely disagree) responses.

RESULTS

Of the experts, 112 and 106 completed the first and second rounds, respectively. 59.8% were rheumatologists with a mean clinical experience of 21.3 years (SD 8.5). Consensus was achieved for 70% of the items, and was established regarding the utility of a T2T strategy to define therapeutic objectives, optimal follow-up, and therapeutic algorithm. Participants agreed on the utility of the bone mineral density (BMD) value (T-score >-2.5 SD for spine and >-2.5/-2.0 SD for femoral neck), lack of fractures, and fracture risk (FRAX) as therapeutic objectives. For measuring BMD changes, consensus was achieved on the suitability of hip and femoral neck locations. Experts agreed to consider treatment failure as when a significant BMD gain could not be achieved, or when a new fracture occurs within 2-3 years. There was consensus that all proposed therapies should achieve a therapeutic target through T2T strategy (treatments with the highest consensus scores were denosumab and teriparatide).

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic objectives, patient follow-up scheme, treatment failure criteria, and appropriate treatment choice for use in T2T strategy in Spain have been established by a panel of experts. Some aspects nevertheless still require further analysis.

A comprehensive care program achieves high remission rates in rheumatoid arthritis in a middle-income setting. Experience of a Center of Excellence in Colombia

Management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in many Latin-American countries is impaired by fragmentation and scarce healthcare provision, resulting in obstacles to access, diagnosis, and treatment, and consequently in poor health outcomes. The aim of this study is to propose a comprehensive care program as a model to provide healthcare to RA patients receiving synthetic DMARDs in a Colombian setting by describing the model and its results. Health outcomes were prospectively collected in all patients entering the program. By protocol, patients are followed up during 24 months using a treat-to-target strategy with a patient-centered care (PCC) model, meaning that a patient should be seen by rheumatologist, physical and occupational therapist, physiatrist, nutritionist and psychologist, at least three times a year according to disease activity by DAS28. Otherwise, patients receive standard therapy. The incidence of remission and low disease activity (LDA) was calculated by periods of follow-up. A total of 968 patients entered the program from January 2015 to December 2016; 80.2% were women. At baseline, 41% of patients were in remission, 17% in LDA and 42% in MDS/SDA. At 24 months of follow-up, 66% were in remission, 18% in LDA and only 16% in MDS/SDA. Regarding DAS28, the mean at the beginning of the time analysis was 3.1 (SD 1.0) and after 24 months it was 2.4 (SD 0.7), showing a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001). In all patients, the reduction of disease activity was 65% (95% CI, 58-71). Patients entering the PCC program benefited from a global improvement in disease activity in terms of DAS28.

Protocols on classification, monitoring and therapy in children's rheumatology (PRO-KIND): results of the working group Polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Several effective pharmacologic treatment options for polyarticual juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have emerged but initial treatment is heterogeneous in Germany. Therefore, the German Society of Pediatric Rheumatolgy has established a commission to develop consensus "Protocols on classification, monitoring and therapy in children's rheumatology (PRO-KIND)" to harmonize diagnostic and treatment approaches for new-onset JIA in Germany.

METHODS

A set of definitions for in- and exclusion, diagnostic workup, parameters for the evaluation of disease activity criteria, therapeutic options, medication dosing, monitoring recommendations, targets, definitions of a therapy failure and four therapeutic algorithms developed by a working group were agreed by web based survey to which all members of the GKJR have been invited. A final protocol with 4 consensus treatment plans (CTP) was agreed in a face-to-face consensus conferences employing modified nominal group technique.

RESULTS

The initial 17 definitions and recommendations for new-onset polyarticular JIA agreed by the working group reached >80% agreement in a web survey in 68 German paediatric rheumatologist. Four CTPs were developed based on treatment strategies for the first 12 months of therapy, as well as definitions for clinical and laboratory monitoring. The CTPs include a step-up plan (nonbiologic Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [DMARD] followed by a biologic), a combination plan (combination of nonbiologic and biologic after failure of initial DMARD), an intensive pulse corticosteroid scheme in parallel with a DMARD followed by combination therapy and a multiple corticosteroids joint injections strategy in a treat to target approach. Step up will be guided by a treat to target strategy to reach a JADAS-improvement at month 3, acceptable disease at month 6 or 9 and JADAS remission or at least JADAS minimal disease activity at month 12.

CONCLUSION

Standardized baseline work-up, disease activity evaluation and a definition of a treat to target approach will result in better health outcomes for polyarticular JIA patients. Four CTPs were developed for new-onset polyarticular JIA, which coupled with data collection at defined intervals will be evaluated and improved to optimize management of polyarticular JIA. Harmonization of treatment will be the basis for future comparative effectiveness research.

Treat to Target in Axial Spondyloarthritis: What Are the Issues?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Treat to Target (T2T) strategy has been widely used in the management of chronic medical conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes, and hypothyroidism, as well as rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and gout. The purpose of this review is to discuss the importance, feasibility, and challenges in adopting the T2T strategy for the management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

RECENT FINDINGS

In 2014, a panel of international experts published recommendations for T2T in axSpA. Recent Tight Control of Inflammation in Early Psoriatic Arthritis (TICOPA) trial demonstrated efficacy of T2T in the management of the psoriatic arthritis. However, there are several issues in the adoption of T2T in axSpA. They include lack of evidence of the impact of aggressive management on clinical and radiographic outcomes in axSpA and unavailability of a definite target for the treatment, as well as limited therapeutic options. In this review, we discuss the intricacies of the T2T strategy in axSpA. We need more clinical evidence in the form of randomized clinical studies to assess the impact of T2T on outcomes in axSpA. We also need a definite target which is useful in the routine clinical practice, as well as for clinical trials.

The Evolution of Treatment Paradigms in Crohn's Disease: Beyond Better Drugs

Despite advances in care, most patients with Crohn's disease (CD) develop complications, such as fistulas, or require surgery. Given the recent advances in drug therapy, an opportunity exists to optimize the management of this chronic disease through early use of effective therapies, clear definition of treatment targets, and application of the principles of personalized medicine. In this article, the authors discuss the evolution of treatment algorithms for CD to incorporate these strategies.

A composite indicator to assess the quality of care in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in outpatient rheumatology clinics

OBJECTIVE

The current guidelines in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include the early diagnosis and early use of disease modifying drugs to achieve remission or low disease activity level, known as "Treat to Target" (T2T). The objective of this study is to develop a composite indicator (CI) to evaluate the quality of care in the management of patients with RA, according to the T2T strategy and other general recommendations concerning the management of these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The phases of the construction of the CI were: 1) selection of quality criteria through expert judgment; 2) prioritization of the criteria, according to relevance and feasibility, applying the Delphi methodology (two rounds) involving 20 experts; 3) design of quality indicators; and 4) calculation of the weighted CI, using the mean value in relevance and feasibility granted by the experts. The source of information for the calculation of the CI are the medical records of patients with RA.

RESULTS

Twelve criteria out of 37 required a second Delphi round. Thirty-one criteria were prioritized. These criteria presented a median in relevance and feasibility greater than or equal to 7.5, with an interquartile range of less than 3.5, and a level of agreement (score greater than or equal to 8) greater than or equal to 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

The constructed CI allows us to evaluate the quality of care of patients with RA following the T2T strategy in the rheumatology units of Spanish hospitals, offering a valid and easily interpretable summary measure.

A comparison of three treatment strategies in recent onset non-systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: initial 3-months results of the BeSt for Kids-study

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy with prednisone or etanercept may induce earlier and/or more improvement in disease activity in Disease Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) naïve non-systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) patients. Here we present three months clinical outcome of initial treatments of the BeSt-for-Kids study.

METHODS

Included patients were randomized to either: 1. initial DMARD-monotherapy (sulfasalazine (SSZ) or methotrexate (MTX)), 2. Initial MTX / prednisolone-bridging, 3. Initial combination MTX/etanercept. Percentage inactive disease, adjusted (a) ACR Pedi30, 50 and 70 and JADAS after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment (intention to treat analysis) and side effects are reported.

RESULTS

94 patients (67% girls, 32 (arm 1), 32 (arm 2) and 30 (arm 3) with median (InterQuartileRange) age of 9.1 (4.7-12.9) years were included. 38% were ANA positive, 10 had oligo-articular disease, 68 polyarticular JIA and 16 psoriatic arthritis. Baseline median (IQR) ACRpedi-scores: VAS physician 49 (40-58) mm, VAS patient 54 (37-70) mm, ESR 6.5 (2-14.8)mm/hr, active joint count 8 (5-12), limited joint count 3 (1-5), CHAQ score 0.88 (0.63-1.5). In arm 1, 17 started with MTX, 15 with SSZ. After 3 months, aACR Pedi 50 was reached by 10/32 (31%), 12/32(38%) and 16/30 (53%) (p = 0.19) and aACR Pedi 70 was reached by 8/32 (25%), 6/32(19%) and 14/30(47%) in arms 1-3 (p = 0.04). Toxicity was similar. Few serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

After 3 months of treatment in a randomized trial, patients with recent-onset JIA achieved significantly more clinical improvement (aACRPedi70) on initial combination therapy with MTX / etanercept than on initial MTX or SSZ monotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NTR1574 . Registered 3 December 2008.

Treat to Target in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Updated Review of Literature. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC. 2017;15:116-125. [PMID: 28161818 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-017-0130-6]

OPINION STATEMENT

Therapeutic management of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) has, for years, been tailored towards monitoring patient clinical presentation as a way to gauge therapeutic management. With the advent of newer biological agents, treatment and management have begun to focus on more objective rather than subjective parameters. These objective parameters include endoscopic targets and focus on the impact of mucosal healing, radiologic and histologic targets, patient reported outcomes, and use of non-invasive biomarkers. However, a recent consensus statement has identified clinical/patient-reported outcome (PRO) remission and endoscopic remission (defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0-1) as the target for UC with histological remission being an adjunctive goal. For CD, clinical/PRO remission defined as resolution of abdominal pain and diarrhea/altered bowel habit and endoscopic remission, defined as resolution of ulceration at ileocolonoscopy, and resolution of findings of inflammation on cross-sectional imaging in patients who cannot be adequately assessed with ileocolonoscopy were the primary targets. Biomarker remission (normal C-reactive protein (CRP) and calprotectin) was considered as an adjunctive target. This approach requires continuous monitoring and therapeutic adjustments with an aim to achieve the target. This article attempts to review the most updated literature regarding the treat to target approach and thus provides current recommendations and supported evidence.

Tapering biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic approach for clinical practice

Optimal rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy in daily clinical practice is based on the treat-to-target strategy. Quicker escalation of therapy and earlier introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have led to improved outcomes in RA. However, chronic immunosuppressive therapy is associated with adverse events and higher costs. In addition, our patients frequently express a desire for lower dosing and drug holidays. Current clinical practice guidelines from the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism suggest that rheumatologists consider tapering treatment after achieving remission. However, the optimal approach for tapering therapy in RA, specifically de-escalation of biologics, remains unknown. This clinical review discusses biologic tapering strategies in RA. We draw our recommendations for everyday clinical practice from the most recent observational, pragmatic, and controlled clinical trials on de-escalation of biologics in RA. For each biologic, we highlight clinically relevant outcomes, such as flare rates, recapture of the disease control with retreatment, radiographic progression, side effects, and functional impact. We discuss the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound to select patients for successful tapering. In conclusion, we provide the reader with a practical guide for tapering biologics in the rheumatology clinic.

Cost-effectiveness of clinical remission by treat to target strategy in established rheumatoid arthritis: results of the CREATE registry

To analyse the cost-effectiveness, in daily clinical practice, of the strategy of treating to the target of clinical remission (CR) in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA), after 2 years of treatment with biological therapy. Adult patients with established RA were treated with biological therapy and followed up for 2 years by a multidisciplinary team responsible for their clinical management. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated by the DAS28 score. The direct costs incurred during this period were quantified from the perspective of the healthcare system. We calculated the cost-effectiveness of obtaining a DAS28 < 2.6, considered as CR. The study included 144 RA patients treated with biological therapies. After 2 years of treatment, 32.6% of patients achieved CR. The mean cost of achieving CR at 2 years was 79,681 ± 38,880 euros. The strategy of treatment to the target of CR is considered the most effective, but in actual clinical practice in patients with established RA, it has a high cost.

Treat to Target in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

OPINION STATEMENT

With the expanding armamentarium in IBD the current treatment targets can be reached. By optimally using our drugs we can avoid long-term complications in IBD. For this the therapeutic strategy has to be changed from a clinically driven approach to a target-driven strategy. Currently mucosal healing, normalization of biomarkers, histological healing, and healing on abdominal imaging are proposed targets. Correct phenotyping of the patient before initiation of therapy is mandatory. Once treatment is initiated a continuous re-evaluation with consequent adaptation of the treatment when goals are not (yet) reached is needed. Both escalation and de-escalation should be considered. Drug levels can be used as a guidance to reach these targets.

Implementation of treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis through a Learning Collaborative: Rationale and design of the TRACTION trial

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Treat-to-target (TTT) is a recommended strategy in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but various data sources suggest that its uptake in routine care in the US is suboptimal. Herein, we describe the design of a randomized controlled trial of a Learning Collaborative to facilitate implementation of TTT.

METHODS

We recruited 11 rheumatology sites from across the US and randomized them into the following two groups: one received the Learning Collaborative intervention in Phase 1 (month 1-9) and the second formed a wait-list control group to receive the intervention in Phase 2 (months 10-18). The Learning Collaborative intervention was designed using the Model for Improvement, consisting of a Change Package with corresponding principles and action phases. Phase 1 intervention practices had nine learning sessions, collaborated using a web-based tool, and shared results of plan-do-study-act cycles and monthly improvement metrics collected at each practice. The wait-list control group sites had no intervention during Phase 1. The primary trial outcome is the implementation of TTT as measured by chart review, comparing the differences from baseline to end of Phase 1, between intervention and control sites.

RESULTS

All intervention sites remained engaged in the Learning Collaborative throughout Phase 1, with a total of 38 providers participating. The primary trial outcome measures are currently being collected by the study team through medical record review.

CONCLUSIONS

If the Learning Collaborative is an effective means for improving implementation of TTT, this strategy could serve as a way of implementing disseminating TTT more widely.

Factors associated with the intensification of treatment in rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice

The aim of the present study was to analyse the patterns of treatment adjustment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with active disease in routine clinical care. This was a cross-sectional study of consecutive patients with RA conducted in five hospitals. Activity scales (DAS28-ESR) and function (HAQ) were measured, as well as whether ultrasound was performed as part of the assessment. Treatment decision (no changes/reduction/intensification) and time to the next scheduled visit were the outcomes variables. Associated factors were analysed by multilevel regression models. A total of 343 patients were included (77 % women, mean age 57 years, mean RA duration 10 years), of whom 44 % were in remission by DAS28. Treatment was continued in 202 (59 %) patients, reduced in 57 (16 %), and intensified in 83 (24 %). In the 117 patients with active RA (DAS28 ≥ 3.2), treatment was intensified in 61 (52 %). Factors associated with treatment intensification were physician and patient VAS, and DAS28, but not the centre. In the multilevel regression analysis with intensification of treatment as dependent variable, the following factors were significantly associated: DAS28 [OR 3.67 (95 % CI 2.43-5.52)], patient VAS [OR 1.04 (95 % CI 1.01-1.08)], and have performed an ultrasound [OR 3.36 (95 % CI 1.47-7.68)]. Factors associated with time to the next scheduled visit (an average of 4.3 months) were patient and physician VAS, DAS28, and centre. In clinical practice, half of the patients with active RA maintain or reduce the treatment. The decision to intensify treatment in active RA as recommended by a treat-to-target strategy is complex in practice.

Influence of urate-lowering therapies on renal handling of uric acid

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of urate-lowering therapies (ULTs) on renal uric acid excretion in gout patients. This prospective observational study involved 106 primary gout patients and 51 healthy controls. Gout patients received ULT with either xanthine oxidase inhibitors or the uricosuric agent benzbromarone. Parameters such as 24-h urinary uric acid, creatinine clearance, uric acid clearance, glomerular filtration load of uric acid, fractional excretion of uric acid, excretion of uric acid per volume of glomerular filtration, and urinary uric acid to urinary creatinine ratio were used to evaluate the pre- and post-treatment renal capacity for uric acid clearance in gout patients and were compared with the values in the healthy controls. Compared to healthy controls, gout patients had higher glomerular filtration load of uric acid and lower uric acid clearance, creatinine clearance, and fractional uric acid excretion. After ULT, both the xanthine oxidase inhibitor group and benzbromarone group patients showed reduction in glomerular filtration load of uric acid. Creatinine clearance was significantly improved in the xanthine oxidase inhibitor group. Excretion function was remarkably enhanced in patients who reached the treatment target (serum uric acid <6 mg/dl). Changes in glomerular uric acid filtration load were significantly correlated with changes in serum urate levels. Gout patients have impaired renal uric acid excretion. ULTs reduce renal urate load and enhance the renal capacity of uric acid clearance. Xanthine oxidase inhibitors showed superiority over benzbromarone in improving renal function.

What is the best treatment strategy for early RA?

Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis has to be started very early, when the diagnosis is made, preferentially before 6 months of symptoms. Combination therapy with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with low-dose, oral glucocorticoids in the induction phase from the start gives the best results. The patient should be monitored systematically, at start between 1 and 3 months, and the patient should have access to additional visits if a flare or arthritis or adverse event occurs. The treatment should aim to remission (no tender and swollen joints, no signs of inflammatory activity), which can be reached by 60-80% of the patients. Intra-articular glucocorticoid injections as part of the treatment strategy increase the suppression of arthritis and retard joint destruction. Biological drugs are reserved for patients who have consistent active disease and who do not respond to conventional combinations.