Rheumatology training in the UK: the trainees' perspective

Rheumatology training in Poland vs. United Kingdom

When evaluating the quality of Rheumatology specialty training, it can be useful to explore similarities and differences between countries. In this article we compare the training in the UK and Poland. The two training programmes are similar in length and in the competencies that must be achieved, although they do have significant differences in the way the training is structured. The UK-based system is more out-patient based, which can be advantageous, as after completion of training the doctor is more confident in treating common rheumatological problems.

On the other hand, having exposure to paediatric rheumatology and orthopaedics like one has in Polish-based training, despite a short placement time, is definitely beneficial for the trainee in gaining all-round knowledge.

In conclusion, each system has its merits and can be further enhanced by observing how junior doctors are sub-speciality trained in different countries.

Paediatric musculoskeletal matters (pmm)--collaborative development of an online evidence based interactive learning tool and information resource for education in paediatric musculoskeletal medicine

BACKGROUND

We describe the collaborative development of an evidence based, free online resource namely 'paediatric musculoskeletal matters' (pmm). This resource was developed with the aim of reaching a wide range of health professionals to increase awareness, knowledge and skills within paediatric musculoskeletal medicine, thereby facilitating early diagnosis and referral to specialist care.

METHODS

Engagement with stakeholder groups (primary care, paediatrics, musculoskeletal specialties and medical students) informed the essential 'core' learning outcomes to derive content of pmm. Representatives from stakeholder groups, social science and web development experts transformed the learning outcomes into a suitable framework. Target audience representatives reviewed the framework and their opinion was gathered using an online survey (n = 74) and focus groups (n = 2). Experts in paediatric musculoskeletal medicine peer reviewed the content and design.

RESULTS

User preferences informed design with mobile, tablet and web compatible versions to facilitate access, various media and formats to engage users and the content presented in module format (i.e. Clinical assessment, Investigations and management, Limping child, Joint pain by site, Swollen joint(s) and Resources).

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that our collaborative and evidence-based approach has ensured that pmm is user-friendly, with readily accessible, suitable content, and will help to improve access to paediatric musculoskeletal medicine education. The content is evidence-based with the design and functionality of pmm to facilitate optimal and 'real life' access to information. pmm is targeted at medical students and the primary care environment although messages are transferable to all health care professionals involved in the care of children and young people.

Improving junior doctors' confidence in paediatric musculoskeletal assessment

AIM

Musculoskeletal symptoms are a common cause for presentation of children and adolescents to health-care settings. Junior doctors report lack of confidence in assessment of the paediatric musculoskeletal system. Our aim was to assess the confidence of junior medical officers (JMOs) working in the emergency department (ED) with paediatric musculoskeletal assessment and determine if a readily available teaching module would improve confidence.

METHODS

JMOs rostered to the paediatric ED were surveyed regarding their confidence in paediatric musculoskeletal assessment at the start and end of their ED rotation. A subgroup of these JMOs received formal teaching on paediatric musculoskeletal assessment using the paediatric gait, arm, leg and spine examination as part of their protected teaching time during their rotation.

RESULTS

Forty-three JMOs were considered in the final analysis. Of those, 27 received teaching (intervention group), and 16 received no teaching (non-intervention group). In the intervention subgroup, there was a trend towards an increase in confidence in paediatric musculoskeletal assessment with the commonest response prior to the teaching intervention being 'some confidence' (11/27 41%) and the commonest response after teaching being 'fairly confident' (14/27 52%) without achieving statistical significance (P = 0.068). Of the JMOs in the intervention group, 26/27 (96%) found the teaching session useful, and 25/27 (93%) considered it relevant to their future practice.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinical examination teaching intervention resulted in a trend towards an increase in confidence for JMOs in paediatric musculoskeletal assessment. Formal evaluation of a teaching module was feasible within the ED.

Predictors of access to care in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: evidence from the UK JSLE Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate factors that may influence the interval between symptom onset and JSLE diagnosis.

METHODS

Data from all patients recruited to the UK JSLE Cohort Study between 2006 and 2011 and meeting ACR criteria for lupus were analysed. Variables associated with time between symptom onset and diagnosis were identified using correlation tests. Linear regression was used to identify independent predictors of access to care.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-seven children with JSLE were included in the analysis (216 females, 41 males, ratio 5.3:1). The median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 0.4 years (range 0.0-14.1 years, interquartile range 0.2-1.4). A linear regression model identified being of African or Caribbean origin (P = 0.006), Asian (P = 0.045), referred by a paediatrician (P = 0.047) or having nephritis (P = 0.045) at presentation as independent predictors of shorter time to diagnosis. Being of Caribbean or Asian origin, compared with white, was associated with a 56% and 37% reduction in geometric mean time to diagnosis, respectively. Similarly, being referred to paediatric rheumatology by a paediatrician or having nephritis at presentation was also associated with a 32% and 36% reduction in geometric mean time to diagnosis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Within this national UK cohort, ethnic origin, initial source of referral and having lupus nephritis at presentation were strong predictors of the interval to establishing a diagnosis of JSLE.

pGALS - paediatric Gait Arms Legs and Spine: a simple examination of the musculoskeletal system

We describe pGALS (paediatric Gait, Arms, Legs and Spine) - a simple quick musculoskeletal assessment to distinguish abnormal from normal joints in children and young people. The use of pGALS is aimed at the non-specialist in paediatric musculoskeletal medicine as a basic clinical skill to be used in conjunction with essential knowledge about red flags, normal development and awareness of patterns of musculoskeletal pathologies. pGALS has been validated in school-aged children and also in the context of acute general paediatrics to detect abnormal joints. We propose that pGALS is an important part of basic clinical skills to be acquired by all doctors who may be involved in the care of children. The learning of pGALS along with basic knowledge is a useful way to increase awareness of joint disease, facilitate early recognition of joint problems and prompt referral to specialist teams to optimise clinical outcomes. We have compiled this article as a resource that can be used by the paediatric rheumatology community to facilitate teaching.

Acceptability and practicality of pGALS in screening for rheumatic disease in Malawian children

The pGALS (paediatric Gait, Arms, Legs, Spine) Musculoskeletal (MSK) screen is validated in English-speaking school-aged children and has been shown to be useful in acute paediatric practice in the UK. The aim of this study is to evaluate the practicality and acceptability of pGALS in children in an acute hospital setting in Malawi. School-aged inpatients and children presenting to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Blantyre, Malawi, participated. Practicality (time taken, degree of completion) and patient/parent assessed acceptability (time take, discomfort) were assessed using a 'smiley face' visual analogue scale. Fifty-one children (median age 8 years) were assessed; 23 out of 51 (45%) in the emergency department and the remainder were inpatients. Most presentations were infection or trauma related (n = 35, 69%). Practicality of pGALS was good [median time to complete pGALS--4 min (range 1.8-7.4)] and completed in 48 out of 51 children (94%). Acceptability was high; 98% of parents considered the time taken to be acceptable, 84% of children deemed little/no additional discomfort. Abnormalities using pGALS were found in 21 out of 51 (41%), mostly in the lower limbs. The pGALS MSK screen was practical and acceptable in this acute setting. Abnormal findings were common.

Acceptability and practicality of musculoskeletal examination in acute general pediatric assessment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the practicality and the acceptability of pGALS (pediatric Gait, Arms, Legs and Spine) screening, a simple pediatric musculoskeletal screening examination, when performed as part of an acute pediatric assessment.

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutive school-aged children attending an acute pediatric assessment unit were assessed with the addition of pGALS to the routine clinical examination. Practicality (ie, time taken, degree of completion) and patients/parent-assessed acceptability (ie, time taken, discomfort caused) were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty consecutive school-aged children (median age 8 years) were evaluated by pGALS. Median time taken was 3 minutes (range 1.2-5.3), and examination was completed in 47/50 (96%) children. Acceptability of pGALS was deemed high: time taken was "about right" (98% children, 94% parents) and caused no or little discomfort (72% of children, 92% of parents). Abnormalities on pGALS examination were common, with most (17/50, 34%) explained by confirmed musculoskeletal disease, and 6 of 50 (12%) had non- musculoskeletal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

PGALS is practical and acceptable to perform in acute pediatric assessment performed by a non expert in musculoskeletal medicine. Abnormal musculoskeletal findings are common as part of the pGALS examination but need to be interpreted in the global clinical context and assessment.

Musculoskeletal screening examination (pGALS) for school-age children based on the adult GALS screen

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a musculoskeletal screening examination applicable to school-age children based on the adult Gait, Arms, Legs, Spine (GALS) screen.

METHODS

Adult GALS was tested in consecutive school-age children attending pediatric rheumatology clinics and was compared with an examination conducted, on the same day, by a pediatric rheumatologist who classified children as having abnormal or normal joints. Adult GALS was tested for validity compared with the pediatric rheumatologist's assessment and deficiencies in adult GALS were identified. Experts proposed amendments to adult GALS, achieving consensus by modified Delphi techniques. The resultant pediatric screening tool (pGALS) was tested (methodology identical to the testing of adult GALS) in an additional group of children.

RESULTS

Adult GALS was tested in 50 children (median age 11 years, range 4-16), of whom 37 (74%) had juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Adult GALS missed important abnormalities in 18% of children, mostly at the ankle, foot, and temporomandibular joints. The pGALS was tested in 65 children (median age 13 years, range 5-17 years) and demonstrated excellent sensitivity (97-100%) and specificity (98-100%) at all joints, with high acceptability scored by child and parent/guardian. The median time to perform pGALS was 2 minutes (range 1.5-3 minutes).

CONCLUSION

The pGALS musculoskeletal screening tool has excellent validity, is quick to perform, and is acceptable to school-age children and parents/guardians. We propose that pGALS be incorporated into undergraduate and postgraduate medical training to improve pediatric musculoskeletal clinical skills and facilitate diagnosis and referral to specialists.

Is musculoskeletal history and examination so different in paediatrics?

Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints in children and adolescents are common. The differential diagnosis is broad and based predominantly on clinical assessment. The skills both for eliciting history and for examination require understanding of the child/young person's specific emotional and cognitive developmental stage; interpretation of the findings requires knowledge of normal (and abnormal) motor and musculoskeletal growth and development. We specifically describe the different approach, unique skills and knowledge required by all clinicians who assess children and adolescents with MSK complaints; children and adolescents are not 'just little adults'. We emphasize the importance of clinical competence in ensuring that patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis are diagnosed early and referral to specialist centres is not delayed with consequential suboptimal management and outcome. There is evidence that physician clinical skills in MSK assessment are inadequate, probably as a result of systemic deficiencies in the education process. Current and proposed solutions are discussed.

Paediatric rheumatology—A global perspective

This chapter aims to give a global perspective to paediatric rheumatology. The main points covered are the incidence, recognition of paediatric autoimmune diseases, and ethnic/geographic distribution. The most prevalent disease is juvenile idiopathic arthritis; robust data are still required for childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, and scleroderma. Mimicking or overlapping infections are a major challenge in developing countries, and immunization policies in our patients in these areas need specific attention. The delivery of paediatric rheumatology care is also overviewed. Discrepancies in health-care resources and priorities are found in developing countries. Although most anti-rheumatic treatments are available worldwide, they are prohibitively expensive in many countries. For more traditional anti-rheumatic drugs there is still an ongoing need for good core outcome data across the world to ensure valid comparisons. Parent/patient education has been implemented worldwide in paediatric rheumatology through the power of the Internet. Physician and undergraduate training goals must be met to facilitate competent musculoskeletal assessment, a proper understanding of age-dependent variations, diagnosis, referral to specialists, and improved standards of care.