Diagnostic performance and validation of autoantibody testing in myositis by a commercial line blot assay

Association between anti-PL7 antibodies and increased fibrotic component in patients with antisynthetase syndrome and interstitial lung disease: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether anti-PL7 and anti-PL12 autoantibodies are associated with a greater extent of the fibrotic component of ILD in ASSD patients.

METHODS

Patients with ILD-ASSD who were positive for one of the following autoantibodies: anti-Jo1, anti-PL7, anti-PL12, and anti-EJ were included. Clinical manifestations, CPK levels, pulmonary function tests, and HCRT assessments were prospectively collected according to the Goh index. The fibrotic, inflammatory, and overall extension of the Goh index and DLCO were assessed by multiple linear analyses and compared between ASSD antibody subgroups.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included; 17 were positive for anti-Jo1 (26%), 17 for anti-PL7 (26%), 20 for anti-PL12 (30%), and 9 (14%) for anti-EJ. Patients with anti-PL7 and anti-PL12 had a more extensive fibrotic component than anti-Jo1. Anti-PL7 patients had a 7.9% increase in the fibrotic extension (cβ = 7.9; 95% CI 1.863, 13.918), and the strength of the association was not modified after controlling for sex, age, and time of disease evolution (aβ = 7.9; 95% CI 0.677, 15.076) and also was associated with an increase in ILD severity after adjusting for the same variables, denoted by a lower DLCO (aβ =  - 4.47; 95% CI - 8.919 to - 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-PL7-positive ASSD patients had more extensive fibrosis and severe ILD than the anti-Jo1 subgroup. This information is clinically useful and has significant implications for managing these patients, suggesting the need for early consideration of concurrent immunosuppressive and antifibrotic therapy.

Positive predictive value of myositis antibody line blot testing in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Line blot (LB) is in widespread use for myositis antibody detection. Yet, studies of its positive predictive value (PPV) in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), which would be of particular relevance to neuromuscular clinicians, are lacking. We aimed to determine the PPV of myositis antibody LB testing in patients with suspected IIM, and examine whether PPV was significantly impacted by intensity of antibody positivity.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent myositis antibody LB testing for suspected IIM between March 2019 and August 2022.

RESULTS

Of 70 patients who underwent testing for suspected IIM and had positive myositis antibody LB results, 43 (61%) were female and the median age was 61 years (range: 10-83 years). Forty-four were classified as true-positives, yielding a PPV of 63%. The PPV of patients with weak-positive myositis antibody results (14/30, 47%) was significantly lower than the PPV of patients with moderate-positive or strong-positive myositis antibody results (30/40, 75%) (p = .02).

DISCUSSION

Our study found that myositis antibody LB testing in patients with suspected IIM had a modest PPV, underscoring the need for antibody interpretation in the context of all available clinical and ancillary test data to avoid misdiagnosis. The significantly lower PPV in patients with weak-positive results emphasizes the particular importance of clinical correlation in such patients. Further study into the diagnostic performance of various LBs for myositis antibody detection is needed to inform their interpretation in clinical practice.

Diagnosis and subtyping of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: caution required in the use of myositis autoantibodies

Detection of myositis autoantibodies (MAs) has utility in both the diagnosis and subtyping of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Multiplex assays such as the Euroimmun line immunoassay (LIA) have significant limitations in rare diseases like IIM. A retrospective cohort study was performed on positive MA detected on LIA in 171 patients using the manufacturer's recommended cut-off. Only 16.7% were deemed true positive after clinical correlation. Autoantibody-specific cut-offs were created and applied to the original cohort, along with generically applied higher cut-offs. Positive predictive value (PPV) improved, but there was variable increase in false negatives. False positive MA results are common using LIA, but locally derived cut-offs can improve performance. Clinicians must be aware of the limitations of LIA, which is the commonest method for MA detection in Australasia.

Novel endotypes of antisynthetase syndrome identified independent of anti-aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase antibody specificity that improve prognostic stratification

OBJECTIVES

To systemically analyse the heterogeneity in the clinical manifestations and prognoses of patients with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) and evaluate the transcriptional signatures related to different clinical phenotypes.

METHODS

A total of 701 patients with ASS were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical presentation and prognosis were assessed in association with four anti-aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase (ARS) antibodies: anti-Jo1, anti-PL7, anti-PL12 and anti-EJ. Unsupervised machine learning was performed for patient clustering independent of anti-ARS antibodies. Transcriptome sequencing was conducted in clustered ASS patients and healthy controls.

RESULTS

Patients with four different anti-ARS antibody subtypes demonstrated no significant differences in the incidence of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) or prognoses. Unsupervised machine learning, independent of anti-ARS specificity, identified three endotypes with distinct clinical features and outcomes. Endotype 1 (RP-ILD cluster, 23.7%) was characterised by a high incidence of RP-ILD and a high mortality rate. Endotype 2 (dermatomyositis (DM)-like cluster, 14.5%) corresponded to patients with DM-like skin and muscle symptoms with an intermediate prognosis. Endotype 3 (arthritis cluster, 61.8%) was characterised by arthritis and mechanic's hands, with a good prognosis. Transcriptome sequencing revealed that the different endotypes had distinct gene signatures and biological processes.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-ARS antibodies were not significant in stratifying ASS patients into subgroups with greater homogeneity in RP-ILD and prognoses. Novel ASS endotypes were identified independent of anti-ARS specificity and differed in clinical outcomes and transcriptional signatures, providing new insights into the pathogenesis of ASS.

Clinical risk factors in patients with interstitial lung disease associated with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies

INTRODUCTION

The anti-MDA5-associated autoimmune disease represents a poorly understood entity. The study's objectives were to describe a cohort of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients who were positive for anti-MDA5 autoantibody and identify clinical risk factors associated with survival.

METHODS

This single-center cohort study included ILD patients positive for anti-MDA5 autoantibody. Baseline clinical features were registered, and survival analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with worse survival.

RESULTS

Fifty-three ILD-MDA5 positive patients were included; twelve died during follow-up due to rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD). Dermatological signs of anti-MDA5 (Gottron papules, Gottron sign, palmar papules, V-neck sign, facial dermatomyositis rashes, and skin ulcers) were strongly associated with death secondary to RP-ILD (HR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.02-13.35). Patients with dermatological signs were younger, had higher anti-MDA5 autoantibodies titers, more frequent inflammatory patterns in HRCT evaluation, and less fibrosis extent in HRCT.

CONCLUSION

Dermatological manifestation in ILD patients to anti-MDA5 autoantibodies are associated with RP-ILD and short-term fatal outcomes. Dermatological signs may identify a subgroup of ILD-positive to anti-MDA5 patients with a high risk of RP-ILD.

Detection of Myositis Autoantibodies by Multi-Analytic Immunoassays in a Large Multicenter Cohort of Patients with Definite Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

BACKGROUND

The usefulness of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) for the assessment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) is acknowledged, but laboratory standardization remains a challenge. We detected MSAs/MAAs by multi-analytic line immunoassay (LIA) and particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) in a multicenter cohort of patients with IIMs.

METHODS

We tested the sera from 411 patients affected with definite IIM, including 142 polymyositis (PM), 147 dermatomyositis (DM), 19 cancer-associated myositis, and 103 overlap myositis syndrome (OM), and from 269 controls. MSAs/MAAs were determined by 16Ags LIA in all sera, and anti-HMGCR by ELISA in 157/411 IIM sera and 91/269 control sera. The analytical specificity of LIA/HMGCR ELISA was compared with that of PMAT in 89 MSA+ IIM sera.

RESULTS

MSAs/MAAs were positive in 307/411 (75%) IIM patients and 65/269 (24%) controls by LIA (Odds Ratio 9.26, 95% CI 6.43-13.13, p < 0.0001). The sensitivity/specificity of individual MSAs/MAAs were: 20%/100% (Jo-1), 3%/99.3% (PL-7), 4%/98.8% (PL-12), 1%/100% (EJ), 0.7%/100% (OJ), 9%/98% (SRP), 5.6%/99.6% (TIF1γ), 4.6%/99.6% (MDA5), 8%/96% (Mi-2), 1.5%/98% (NXP2), 1.7%/100% (SAE1), 4%/92% (Ku), 8.5%/99% (PM/Scl-100), 8%/96% (PM/Scl-75), and 25.5%/79% (Ro52). Anti-HMGCR was found in 8/157 (5%) IIM patients and 0/176 (0%) controls by ELISA (p = 0.007). Concordance between LIA/HMGCR ELISA and PMAT was found in 78/89 (88%) samples. Individual MSAs detected by LIA were associated with IIM subsets: Jo-1 with PM and OM, PL-12 with OM, Mi-2, TIF1γ, and MDA5 with DM, SRP with PM, and PM/Scl-75/100 with OM (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Since MSAs are mostly mutually exclusive, multi-specific antibody profiling seems effective for a targeted clinical-serologic approach to the diagnosis of IIMs.

Polymyositis and dermatomyositis biomarkers

Polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) are the two subtypes of idiopathic inflammatory myositis and are characterized as symmetrical progressive muscle weakness in the proximal extremities. PM/DM affect multiple organs and systems, including the cardiovascular, respiratory and digestive tract systems. An in-depth understanding of PM/DM biomarkers will facilitate development of simple and accurate strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis prediction. This review summarized the classic biomarkers of PM/DM, including anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (ARS) antibody, anti-Mi-2 antibody, anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody, anti-transcription intermediary factor 1-γ (TIF1-γ) antibody, anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP2) antibody, among others. Among them, anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetases antibody is the most classic. In addition, many potential novel biomarkers were also discussed in this review, including anti-HSC70 antibody, YKL-40, interferons, myxovirus resistance protein 2, regenerating islet-derived protein 3-α, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-35, microRNA (miR)-1 and so on. Among the biomarkers of PM/DM described in this review, classic biomarkers have become the mainstream biomarkers to assist clinicians in diagnosis due to their early discovery, in-depth research, and widespread application. The novel biomarkers also have potential and broad research prospects, which will make immeasurable contributions to exploring biomarker-based classification standards and expanding their application value.

Anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis: an update from bench to bedside

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the recent developments about anti-MDA5 antibody positive dermatomyositis with a focus on its pathogenesis, clinical features and treatment options of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease, its most ominous complication.

RECENT FINDINGS

Anti-MDA5+ dermatomyositis has a heterogeneous clinical spectrum with different patient subsets exhibiting widely different outcomes; severe acute interstitial lung disease is the main factor impacting prognosis. The pathogenetic role of anti-MDA5 antibodies is an active area of investigation.

SUMMARY

Anti-MDA5+ dermatomyositis has a wider spectrum of manifestations than previously thought. A high index of suspicion is needed not to miss atypical presentations. In the setting of acute interstitial lung involvement, once a confident diagnosis is made, an aggressive approach with early combined immunosuppression affords the best chances of survival.

Screening and characterization of myositis-related autoantibodies in COVID-19 patients

An efficient host immune response against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19) appears to be crucial for controlling and resolving this viral infection. However, many studies have reported autoimmune characteristics in severe COVID-19 patients. Moreover, clinical observations have revealed that COVID-19-associated acute distress respiratory syndrome shares many features in common with inflammatory myopathy including interstitial lung disease (ILD), most particularly rapidly progressive (RP)-ILD. This study explored this phenomenon by seeking to identify and characterize myositis-specific and related autoantibodies in 25 COVID-19 patients with mild or severe symptoms. Line blot analysis with the EUROLINE Myopathies Ag kit identified 9 (36%) patients with COVID-19 with one or more autoantibodies against several myositis-related antigens (Jo-1, Ku, Mi-2β, PL-7, PL-12, PM-Scl 75, PM-Scl 100, Ro-52, and SRP); no anti-MDA5 antibodies were detected. As the presence of antibodies identified by line blots was unrelated to disease severity, we further characterized the autoantibodies by radioimmunoassay, in which [³⁵ S]methionine-labeled K562 cellular antigens were precipitated and visualized by gel electrophoresis. This result was confirmed by an immunoprecipitation assay and immunoblotting; 2 patients exhibited anti-Ku70 and anti-Ku80 antibodies. Our data suggest that it is necessary to use more than one method to characterize and evaluate autoantibodies in people recovered from COVID-19, in order to avoid misinterpreting those autoantibodies as diagnostic markers for autoimmune diseases.

Interstitial lung disease progression in patients with anti-aminoacyl transfer-RNA-synthetase autoantibodies is characterized by higher levels of sCD163

BACKGROUND

Patients with anti-tRNA autoantibodies are characterized by arthritis, mechanic´s hands, fever, Raynaud´s phenomenon, and interstitial lung disease (ILD), in at least two clinical scenarios: the antisynthetase syndrome (ASSD) and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). The anti-tRNA-ILD treatment is centered on the administration of corticosteroids and a wide variety of immunosuppressive drugs; however, the effectiveness of the treatment depends on factors not fully understood. This research work aimed to quantify the serum levels of two molecules related to pulmonary fibrosis and explore their relationship with the progression of ILD associated with ASSD METHODOLOGY: Serum levels of sCD163 and TGF-β1 from baseline and after six months of treatment of ILD patients' positives to anti-tRNA were included in the current study. At six months, patients were classified as with or without ILD progression RESULTS: Forty patients were included (anti-Jo1, anti-PL7, anti-PL12, and anti-Ej). Five patients (12.5%) had ILD progression and were characterized by higher levels of sCD163 at baseline. Baseline sCD163 serum levels showed good discriminatory capacity in patients with ILD progression. On the other hand, at follow-up, serum TGF-β1 levels significantly increased in both patients' groups, with and without progression CONCLUSION: Basal levels of sCD163 were higher in patients who later developed ILD progression and kinetics of both molecules suggests the participation of M2 macrophages in the development of ILD.

Myositis-specific Antibodies: Overview and Clinical Utilization

Purpose of review-To review autoantibodies associated with different subtypes of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) and their clinical applications. IIM are a heterogenous group of autoimmune disorders characterized by muscle weakness, cutaneous features, and internal organ involvement. The diagnosis and classification, which is often challenging, is made using a combination of clinical features, muscle enzyme levels, imaging, and biopsy. The landmark discoveries of novel autoantibodies specific to IIM subtypes have been one of the greatest advancements in the field of myositis. The specificity of these autoantibodies has simplified the diagnostic algorithm of IIM with their heterogenous presentation and outdated the earlier diagnostic criteria. Myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) have improved diagnostics, clinical phenotyping, and prognostic stratification of the subtypes of IIMs. Furthermore, the levels of certain MSAs correlate with disease activity and muscle enzyme levels such that titers may be able to be used to predict disease course and treatment response.

Concordance between myositis autoantibodies and anti-nuclear antibody patterns in a real-world, Australian cohort

OBJECTIVES

Myositis autoantibodies (MAs) were traditionally used as diagnostic biomarker for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). Its clinical utility had recently expanded to include interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis. Depending on the patient cohort, MAs false positives can be common. Correlation between anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) indirect immunofluorescent (IIF) pattern and MAs may improve its positive predictive value (PPV). The aim of our study was to determine the PPV of MAs in IIM and ILD in a real-world patient cohort. We also assessed whether concordance between MAs and ANA IIF pattern can improve the PPV of positive MA results.

METHODS

Patients with positive MAs and corresponding ANA IIF pattern were identified from Sutherland Centre of Immunology, New South Wales Health Pathology, Australia. The corresponding health records were reviewed to identify each patient's primary diagnosis. Chi-square test was used to compare the PPV between MA-ANA concordant and discordant groups.

RESULTS

Between January 2016 and July 2019, 118 patients were positive for at least one MA (mean age 66.7 years, 55% female). The most frequently detected autoantibodies were Ro52, anti-synthetase antibodies, and PM-Scl. The PPV of MAs for IIM or ILD was 47.4%. The overall concordance rate of MAs and ANA IIF pattern was 70.2%. Patients with concordant MA-ANA results were more likely to have true clinical disease (64.1% vs 17.8%, p< 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Myositis autoantibodies have a low PPV for IIM and ILD in a real-world patient cohort. A positive concordance with ANA IIF pattern can improve MA test accuracy.

Myositis Antibodies and Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a heterogeneous group of inflammatory and fibrotic conditions, often resulting in progressive lung function decline and increased mortality. Connective tissue disease (CTD) should be considered in all patients with ILD, as distinguishing between CTD-ILD and other forms of fibrotic lung disease has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) represent a CTD subtype of growing interest to ILD experts. The expansion and availability of myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibody testing has allowed for improved disease detection and characterization.

CONTENT

In this review, we highlight the relationship between myositis antibodies and ILD. Select forms of IIM, such as the antisynthetase syndrome and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis can present with rapidly progressive ILD, warranting timely disease diagnosis and management. Disease phenotypes, prevalence, laboratory testing, prognosis, and management strategies are described according to select myositis antibodies.

SUMMARY

Myositis antibodies provide valuable information for clinicians managing patients with ILD. This review aims to increase awareness of their role in disease detection, pathophysiology, and possibly therapeutics.

An Italian Multicenter Study on Anti-NXP2 Antibodies: Clinical and Serological Associations

The identification of anti-NXP2 antibodies is considered a serological marker of dermatomyositis (DM), with calcinosis, severe myositis and, in some reports, with cancer. Historically, these associations with anti-NXP2 antibodies have been detected by immunoprecipitation (IP), but in the last few years commercial immunoblotting assays have been released. The aim of this collaborative project was to analyse the clinical features associated to anti-NXP2 antibodies, both with commercial line blot (LB) and IP. Myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies were detected in single centres by commercial line blot (LB); available sera were evaluated in a single centre by protein and RNA immunoprecipitation (IP), and IP-Western blot. Sixty patients anti-NXP2+ (NXP2+) positive by LB were compared with 211 patients anti-NXP2 negative with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM). NXP2+ showed a younger age at IIM onset (p = 0.0014), more frequent diagnosis of dermatomyositis (p = 0.026) and inclusion-body myositis (p = 0.009), and lower rate of anti-synthetase syndrome (p < 0.0001). As for clinical features, NXP2+ more frequently develop specific skin manifestations and less frequently features related with overlap myositis and anti-synthetase syndrome. IP confirmed NXP2 positivity in 31 of 52 available sera (62%). Most clinical associations were confirmed comparing NXP2 LB+/IP+ versus NXP2-negative myositis, with the following exceptions: inclusion-body myositis diagnosis was not detected, whilst dysphagia and myositis were found more frequently in NXP2 LB+/IP+ patients. The 21 LB+ /IP-myositis patients did not show differences in clinical features when compared with the NXP2-myositis patients and more frequently displayed multiple positivity at LB. Risk of developing cancer-associated myositis was similar between NXP2-positive and NXP2-negative myositis patients, either when detected by LB or IP. Protein-IP confirmed NXP2 antibodies in nearly 60% of sera positive for the same specificity with commercial assay. Double-positive cases rarely occurred in myositis patients with a clinical diagnosis other than dermatomyositis. Patients only positive by LB (LB+/IP-) did not display clinical features typical of NXP2. NXP2 positivity by LB should be confirmed by other methods in order to correctly diagnose and characterize patients affected by idiopathic inflammatory myositis.

OptimisAtion of Diagnostic Accuracy in idioPathic inflammaTory myopathies (ADAPT study): a protocol for a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of multimodality testing in patients suspected of a treatable idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) excluding inclusion body myositis (IBM) are a group of heterogeneous autoimmune disorders characterised by subacute-onset and progressive proximal muscle weakness, which are frequently part of a multisystem autoimmune disorder. Reaching the diagnosis can be challenging, and no gold standard for the diagnosis of IIM exists. Diagnostic modalities include serum creatine kinase activity, muscle imaging (MRI or ultrasound (US)), electromyography (EMG), myositis autoantibody testing and muscle biopsy. Several diagnostic criteria have been developed for IIMs, varying in reported sensitivity and specificity.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesise that an evidence-based diagnostic strategy, using fewer and preferably the least invasive diagnostic modalities, can achieve the accuracy of a complete panel of diagnostic tests, including MRI, US, EMG, myositis-specific autoantibody testing and muscle biopsy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The OptimizAtion of Diagnostic Accuracy in idioPathic inflammaTory myopathies study is a prospective diagnostic accuracy study with an over-complete study design. 100 patients suspected of an IIM excluding IBM will be included. A reference diagnosis will be assigned by an expert panel using all clinical information and all results of all ancillary tests available, including 6 months of follow-up. Several predefined diagnostic strategies will be compared against the reference diagnosis to find the optimal diagnostic strategy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the medical ethics committee of the Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2019-814). The results will be distributed through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Netherlands trial register; NL8764.

Profiling of Myositis Specific Antibodies and Composite Scores as an Aid in the Differential Diagnosis of Autoimmune Myopathies

(1) Background: Myositis specific antibodies (MSA) represent important diagnostic and stratification tools in idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) patients. Here we aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of MSA profiled by a novel particle based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) in IIM and subsets thereof. (2) Methods: 264 IIM patients and 200 controls were tested for MSA using PMAT (Inova Diagnostics, research use only). Diagnostic performance was analyzed and composite scores were generated. (3) Results: The sensitivity/specificity of the individual MSA were: 19.7%/100% (Jo-1), 7.2%/100.0% (Mi-2), 3.0%/99.0% (NXP2), 3.8%/100.0% (SAE), 2.7%/100.0% (PL-7), 1.9%/99.5 (PL-12), 1.1%/100.0% (EJ), 15.5%/99.5% (TIF1γ), 8.3%/98.5% (MDA5), 6.1%/99.0% (HMGCR) and 1.9%/98.5% (SRP). Of all IIM patients, 180/264 tested positive for at least one of the MSAs. In the individual control group, 12/200 (6.0%) tested positive for at least one MSA, most of which had levels close to the cut-off (except one SRP and one PL-12). Only 6/264 (2.3%) IIM patients were positive for more than one antibody (MDA5/HMGCR, EJ/PL-7, 2 x MDA5/TIF1γ, EJ/SAE, SAE/TIF1γ). The overall sensitivity was 68.2% paired with a specificity of 94.0%, leading to an odds ratio of 33.8. The composite scores showed good discrimination between subgroups (e.g., anti-synthetase syndrome). (4) Conclusion: MSA, especially when combined in composite scores (here measured by PMAT), provide value in stratification of patients with IIM.

Clinical profile and treatment outcomes in antisynthetase syndrome: a tertiary centre experience

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to describe the clinical profile and outcomes in patients with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) from a tertiary care centre.

METHODS

The clinical data and investigations of all patients classified as ASS by Connors criteria over 5 years were recorded, and they were followed up prospectively. The median (interquartile range) was used for descriptive statistics. Clinical variables between the Jo-1 and non-Jo-1 groups and between patients with and without anti-Ro52 antibodies were compared using the χ2 test. Survival analysis was done using the log rank test.

RESULTS

The 28 patients (23 females) had a median age of 42.5 (34.8-52.3) years, with a disease duration of 1.75 (0.6-3.8) years at diagnosis, and had a follow-up of 2 (0.25-4.25) years. Seronegative arthritis was seen in 23 of 28 patients. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia was seen in 19 patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Antibodies to Jo-1 (n = 17) were more frequent than non-Jo-1 antibodies (n = 11; five anti-PL-12, four anti-PL-7 and two anti-EJ). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of myositis (P = 0.07) or ILD (P = 0.11) between groups. Anti-Ro52 antibodies were more frequently found in the non-Jo-1 group (P = 0.006, ϕ = 0.51). A partial or complete improvement with treatment was seen in three-quarters of the patients. Five patients succumbed to the illness. Better survival was seen in the Jo-1 group (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The most typical presenting manifestation of ASS in our cohort was isolated seronegative arthritis. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia was the commonest ILD pattern. Patients with antibodies to Jo-1 had better survival compared with non-Jo-1. The non-Jo-1 aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetases had a strong association with anti-Ro52 antibodies.

Diagnosis of myositis-associated interstitial lung disease: Utility of the myositis autoantibody line immunoassay

OBJECTIVES

The detection of myositis autoantibodies (MA) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) has major implications for diagnosis and management, especially amyopathic and forme frustes of idiopathic inflammatory myositis-associated ILD (IIM-ILD). Use of the MA line immunoblot assay (MA-LIA) in non-rheumatological cohorts remains unvalidated. We assessed the diagnostic performance of the MA-LIA and explored combined models with clinical variables to improve identification of patients with IIM-ILD.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred to a specialist ILD clinic, with ILD-diagnosis confirmed at multidisciplinary meeting, and MA-LIA performed within six months of baseline were included. Pre-specified MA-LIA thresholds were evaluated for IIM-ILD diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total 247 ILD patients were included (IIM-ILD n = 12, non-IIM connective tissue disease-associated ILD [CTD-ILD] n = 52, idiopathic interstitial pneumonia [IIP] n = 115, other-ILD n = 68). Mean age was 64.8 years, with 45.3% female, mean FVC 75.5% and DLCO 59.2% predicted. MA were present in 13.8% overall and 83.3% of IIM-ILD patients. The most common MA in IIM-ILD and non-IIM ILD patients were anti-Jo-1 (prevalence 40%) and anti-PMScl (29.2%) autoantibodies respectively. The pre-specified low-positive threshold (>10 signal intensity) had the highest discriminative capacity for IIM-ILD (AUC 0.86). Combining MA-LIA with age, gender, clinical CTD-manifestations and an overlap non-specific interstitial pneumonia/organising pneumonia pattern on HRCT improved discrimination for IIM-ILD (AUC 0.96).

CONCLUSION

The MA-LIA is useful to support a diagnosis of IIM-ILD as a complement to multi-disciplinary ILD assessment. Clinical interpretation is optimised by consideration of the strength of the MA-LIA result together with clinical and radiological features of IIM-ILD.

Prognostic values of anti-Ro52 antibodies in anti-MDA5-positive clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis associated with interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

Anti-Ro52 antibody often co-occurs with anti-Jo1 antibody in antisynthetase syndrome and their co-occurrence correlates with a more aggressive clinical phenotype and poorer prognosis. The strong association of anti-Ro52 antibody with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein-5 (anti-MDA5) antibody has been indicated in juvenile myositis. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of anti-Ro52 antibody in a cohort of adult patients with anti-MDA5-positive clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis with interstitial lung disease (CADM-ILD).

METHODS

We assessed a cohort of 83 consecutive patients with anti-MDA5-positive CADM-ILD. Anti-MDA5 antibodies and anti-Ro52 antibodies were detected in immunoblotting and semi-quantitatively analysed by densitometry. Clinical features and the 24 month survival were compared between anti-MDA5-positive patients with and without anti-Ro52 antibodies.

RESULTS

Anti-Ro52 antibodies were found in 74.7% of anti-MDA5-positive CADM-ILD patients and were associated with an increased frequency of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD; 54.8% vs 23.8%; P = 0.014) and cutaneous ulcerations (27.4% vs 4.8%; P = 0.033). The cumulative 24 month survival rate tended to be lower in patients with anti-Ro52 antibodies than patients without (59.9% vs 85.7%; P = 0.051). The combination of anti-Ro52 antibody status and anti-MDA5 antibody levels further stratified patients' survival rates, showing that the survival rate of patients who were dual positive for anti-MDA5 antibody and anti-Ro52 antibody was significantly lower than patients with mild positive anti-MDA5 antibody alone (59.9% vs 100%; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Anti-Ro52 antibody is highly prevalent in anti-MDA5-positive CADM-ILD patients and their coexistence correlates with a subgroup of patients with more aggressive phenotypes. The combination of anti-MDA5 antibody levels and anti-Ro52 antibody status could help to predict patients' prognosis and guide risk-based therapy.

Performance of myositis-specific antibodies detected on myositis line immunoassay to diagnose and sub-classify patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, a retrospective records-based review

AIM

To evaluate myositis line immunoassay (LIA) for diagnosis and sub-classification of suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). To investigate if test performance is improved by increasing signal strength cut-off for myositis-specific antibody (MSA) or combining MSA with indirect immunofluorescence (IIF).

METHODS

A retrospective, consecutive case series of patients investigated for MSAs from June 2013 to June 2020 for suspected IIM. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated with 95% confidence intervals for diagnosis of IIM. Association of IIM diagnosis with increased signal strength and presence of an expected IIF pattern on Hep-2 cells was assessed by Fisher's exact test in MSA-positive patients.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients were evaluated. IIM was diagnosed in 32/195 (16.4%) patients. MSAs were detected in 41/195 (21%) patients, 18/41 (43.9%) patients with an MSA had a diagnosis of IIM. The probability of an IIM diagnosis was increased in MSA-positive patients with high compared with low signal strength (83.3% vs 43.5%; P = 0.01) and an expected compared with unexpected IIF pattern (61.5% vs 23.8%; P = 0.04). Specificity for IIM was not significantly improved by increasing signal strength cut-off (85.9% vs 93.8%). Positive predictive value of myositis LIA was only modest and not significantly improved by either increasing signal strength cut-off or requiring an expected IIF pattern for determination of MSA positivity (43.9% vs 60% vs 61.5%). Sub-classification of IIM correlated closely for respective MSAs (88.9%).

CONCLUSION

Increased MSA signal strength on myositis LIA and the presence of an expected IIF pattern were associated with IIM diagnosis. Test performance was non-significantly improved by these methods. Prevalence of IIM in this patient cohort was low; it is not excluded that LIA performance could be improved by these methods in a higher prevalence cohort.

The Association of Myositis Specific Antibodies in Patients with Inflammatory Myositis: Preliminary Data in Indian Patients

CONTEXT

Autoantibodies have a role in the diagnosis and prognosis in Autoimmune Inflammatory Myositis (AIM).

AIMS

The aim of this work was to study the prevalence and clinical correlation of myositis specific and associated antibodies (MSA and MAA) in AIM.

SETTING AND DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional observational study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Consecutive AIM patents were divided into groups as dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), CTD-associated myositis (CTD-M), cancer-associated myositis (CAM) and juvenile myositis (JM). Their data along with serum samples were collected after obtaining informed consent. Sera was analyzed for IgG antibodies against Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, EJ, SRP, Mi-2, MDA-5, TIF1γ, SAE1, SAE2, NXP2 and SSA/R052kD using the microELISA technique. The institutional ethics committee approved the study.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

SPSS software (version 24.0) was used. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 48 patients (DM = 19, PM = 19, CTD-M = 5, CAM = 2, JM = 3) included. MSA were positive in 37.5% patients. Antibodies against Mi-2 were present in 6 (12.5%), Jo-1 in 5 (10.4%), 2 (4.1%) each had PL-7 and SRP antibodies. One patient (2%) each had MDA-5, NXP2 and TIf1g antibodies. Jo-1 antibody was associated with mechanic's hands and ILD. There was a significant association of rash in the Mi-2 group with none of the patients having ILD. Malignancy screening was negative in NXP2 and TIF1g antibody-positive patients. Ro52 was the most common MAA (33.3%) and was associated with mechanic's hand.

CONCLUSION

MSA was present in almost 40% of the cohort. Anti Jo-1 antibody was associated with mechanic's hands and ILD. None of the Mi-2 patients had ILD, which may point to a protective role of this antibody for ILD. The association of newer antibodies in Indian patients needs to be further studied in larger cohorts.

Possible misclassification of cardiovascular risk by SCORE in antisynthetase syndrome: results of the pilot multicenter study RI.CAR.D.A

OBJECTIVES

To test the ability of an established traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk prediction score [Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE)] and its EULAR modified version (mSCORE) to identify antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) patients at high CV risk and to examine for the first time associations of CV and cerebrovascular surrogate markers with clinical and immunological ASyS parameters.

METHODS

SCORE/mSCORE and the gold standard marker of aortic stiffness [carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV)] were examined in ASyS patients and healthy controls. Moreover, sonography of the common- (CCA) and internal- (ICA) carotid arteries was performed in subsets of both groups, evaluating carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), plaques and Doppler sonographic cerebrovascular surrogates [resistance (RI) and pulsatility (PI) indices].

RESULTS

We recruited 66 ASyS patients and 88 controls. According to mSCORE, 10% of the patients had high CV risk. However, cfPWV and carotid sonography revealed an increased CV risk in 21.2% and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis (SCA) in 85.7% of the patients, respectively. cfPWV and cIMT were higher in patients compared with controls (Padj=0.021 and Padj=0.003, respectively). In the ASyS group, cfPWV and cIMT correlated significantly with age (r = 0.679; P<0.001 and r = 0.664; P<0.001, respectively). Moreover, cfPWV correlated with BMI (Padj=0.001) and diabetes (Padj=0.043). CCA-RI and CCA-PI showed significant associations with creatine phosphokinase (r = 0.629; P=0.012 and r = 0.574; P=0.032, respectively) and ICA-RI and ICA-PI were higher in patients with lung involvement (both; P=0.039).

CONCLUSION

ASyS patients had higher aortic stiffness and SCA compared with controls, even after adjustment for confounders. SCORE/mSCORE performed poorly in identifying high-risk patients compared with cfPWV and carotid sonography. Thus, cfPWV and carotid sonography may improve CV and cerebrovascular screening in ASyS.

Geographical Latitude Remains as an Important Factor for the Prevalence of Some Myositis Autoantibodies: A Systematic Review

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are characterized by muscular weakness, cutaneous manifestations, muscle damage revealed by increase of muscular enzymes, muscle biopsy, electromyography and changes on magnetic resonance imaging. However, the hallmark of these IIM, is the development of myositis specific antibodies (MSA) or myositis associated antibodies (MAA). The theories about their presence in the serum of IIM is not known. Some studies have suggested that some of these MSA, such as anti-Mi-2 increases according to the intensity of UV radiation. There is scarce information about the environmental factors that might contribute in order to be considered as triggering factors as UV radiation might be. In this review, we analyzed the reported prevalence of MSAs and MAAs regarding to their geographical location and the possible relation with UV radiation. We collected the prevalence data of fifteen MSA and thirteen MAA from 22 countries around the world and we were able to observe a difference in prevalence between countries and continents. We found differences in anti-PL7, anti-Ro52, anti-La and anti-Ku prevalence according to UV radiation level. Otherwise, we observed that anti-Mi-2 prevalence increases near to the Equator meanwhile anti-MJ/NXP2 and anti-ARS prevalence had an opposite behavior increasing their prevalence in the geographical locations farther to the Equator. Our results highlighted the importance to include the UV radiation and other environmental factors in IIM studies, in order to clarify its association with MSA and MAA prevalence as well as its possible role in the immunopathogenesis of these diseases.

Dermatomyositis autoantibodies: how can we maximize utility?

The past 15 years has seen significant advances in the characterization of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and their associated phenotypes in patients with dermatomyositis (DM). As more careful studies are performed, it is clear that unique combinations of clinical and pathological phenotypes are associated with each MSA, despite the fact that there is considerable heterogeneity within antibody classes as well as overlap across the groups. Because risk for interstitial lung disease (ILD), internal malignancy, adverse disease trajectory, and, potentially response to therapy differ by DM MSA group, a deeper understanding of MSAs and validation and standardization of assays used for detection are critical for optimizing diagnosis and treatment. Like any test, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of assays for various MSAs is not perfect. Currently tests for MSAs are helpful at minimum for a clinician to assess relative risk or contribute to diagnosis and perhaps counsel the appropriate patient about what to expect. With international standardization and larger studies it is likely that more antibody tests will make their way into formal schemata for diagnosis and actionable risk assessment in DM. In this review, we summarize key considerations for interpreting the clinical and pathologic associations with MSA in DM and identify critical gaps in knowledge and practice that will maximize their clinical utility and utility for understanding disease pathogenesis.

Autoantibodies in outbred Swiss Webster mice following exposure to gold and mercury

Exposure to heavy metals may have toxic effects on several human organs causing morbidity and mortality. Metals may trigger or exacerbate autoimmunity in humans. Inbred mouse strains with certain H-2 haplotypes are susceptible to xenobiotic-induced autoimmunity; and their immune response to metals such as mercury, gold, and silver have been explored. Serum antinuclear antibodies (ANA), polyclonal B-cell activation, hypergammaglobulinemia and tissue immune complex deposition are the main features of metal-induced autoimmunity in inbred mice. However, inbred mouse strains do not represent the genetic heterogeneity in humans. In this study, outbred Swiss Webster (SW) mice exposed to gold or mercury salts showed immune and autoimmune responses. Intramuscular injection of 22.5 mg/kg.bw aurothiomalate (AuTM) induced IgG ANA in SW mice starting after 5 weeks that persisted until week 15 although with a lower intensity. This was accompanied by elevated serum levels of total IgG antibodies against chromatin and total histones. Exposure to gold led to development of serum IgG autoantibodies corresponding to H1 and H2A histones, and dsDNA. Both gold and mercury induced polyclonal B-cell activation. Eight mg/L mercuric chloride (HgCl₂) in drinking water, caused IgG antinucleolar antibodies (ANoA) after 5 weeks in SW mice accompanied by immune complex deposition in kidneys and spleen. Serum IgG antibodies corresponding to anti-fibrillarin, and anti-PM/Scl-100 antibodies, were observed in mercury-exposed SW mice. Gold and mercury trigger systemic autoimmune response in genetically heterogeneous outbred SW mice and suggest them as an appropriate model to study xenobiotic-induced autoimmunity.

The use and diagnostic value of testing myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies by line immuno-assay: a retrospective study

AIMS

Line immune-assays (LIA) for the detection of myositis-specific antibodies (MSA) are used widely for characterization of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Their current use and significance for the diagnosis of IIM remains unclear.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we retrieved clinical diagnoses of patients tested for MSA and myositis-associated antibodies (MAA) Jo-1, Mi-2α, Mi-2β, TIF1γ, SRP, MDA-5, NXP-2, SAE, PL-7, PL-12, EJ, OJ, PM-Scl100, PM-Scl75 and Ku. We calculated clinical specificity, clinical sensitivity, negative- and positive predictive values (PPV) as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios.

RESULTS

In total, we analyzed 3167 samples. After exclusion of repeated measurements and patients with insufficient clinical information, data of 1118 patients were available for analysis. A total of 242 patients tested positive for at least one antibody, of which 45 patients had a diagnosis of IIM; 25 IIM patients were negative for all MSA/MAA. Clinical specificity of MSA/MAA for the diagnosis of IIM ranged between 94.2% and 99.9%. Clinical sensitivity and PPV across all antibodies tested ranged from 0.0% to 12.9% and 0.0% to 72.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice MSA/MAA are used widely for diagnostic work-up of IIM, resulting in a low pre-test probability. Clinicians should be aware that PPVs for most MSA/MAA are low.

COVID-19 or clinical amyopathic dermatomyositis associated rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease? A case report

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has reach pandemic proportions globally. For patients with symptoms of fever and cough accompanied by rapid lung damage progression, COVID-19 needs to be distinguished from interstitial lung disease (ILD) attributed to connective tissue disease (CTD), especially dermatomyositis (DM)/clinical amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) associated rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD).

Case presentation

We report a case of a woman observed with fever, cough, and rapid lung damage during the epidemic. The patient had a suspicious epidemiological history, and her chest CT scans showed lung damage similar to that caused by COVID-19, but anti-Ro52 antibody was strongly positive. She was diagnosed with CADM associated RP-ILD and died 1 month later.

Conclusions

During the COVID-19 epidemic, it is critical to carefully assess patients with CTD related ILD, especially RP-ILD associated with CADM. Repeated nucleic acid tests for COVID-19 are necessary to achieve accurate case diagnosis. High-resolution CT (HRCT) of the chest is presently deemed an inefficient technique to distinguishing between COVID-19 and CADM associated RP-ILD. The characteristic rashes of dermatomyositis require careful observation and can often provide diagnostic clues. For patients with CADM, a high titers of anti-Ro52 antibody may be related to the pathogenesis of RP-ILD, suggesting a poor prognosis.

Auto-antibody evaluation in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia and worse survival of patients with Ro52/TRIM21auto-antibody

Some patients with interstitial pneumonia (IP) have auto-antibodies, but do not fit the criteria for specific connective tissue diseases. Examination of auto-antibodies is recommended for diagnosis idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. A prospective cohort study was performed in 285 patients with IP. Eleven auto-antibodies were assessed and patients were followed for 2 years. All 285 patients underwent the myositis panel test (MPT) for 11 auto-antibodies. Among them, 23.5% (67/285) of the patients had a positive MPT and 14.7% (42/285) had connective tissue diseases. Among the 49 MPT positive patients without connective tissue diseases, 29 patients (59.2%) were positive for Ro52, including 17 patients with Ro52 mono-positivity. Among interstitial pneumonia patients without connective tissue diseases, the Ro52 mono-positive patients showed worse at 2-years survival than those who were Ro52 negative (p = 0.022, HR = 5.88, 95% CI 1.29–26.75). Most of the Ro52 positive patients also showed a low titer of anti-nucleolar antibody. About 20% of IP patients had auto-antibodies detectable by the MPT, and Ro52 positive patients accounted for more than half of the MPT positive patients without connective tissue diseases. Detection of Ro52 auto-antibodies may be useful for assessing the risk of progression in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia patients without connective tissue diseases and a low anti-nucleolar antibody titer.

Line blot immunoassays in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: retrospective review of diagnostic accuracy and factors predicting true positive results

Background

Line blot immunoassays (LIA) for myositis-specific (MSA) and myositis-associated (MAA) autoantibodies have become commercially available. In the largest study of this kind, we evaluated the clinical performance of a widely used LIA for MSAs and MAAs.

Methods

Adults tested for MSA/MAA by LIA at a tertiary myositis centre (January 2016–July 2018) were identified. According to expert-defined diagnoses, true and false positive rates were calculated for strongly and weakly positive autoantibody results within three cohorts: idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), connective tissue disease (CTD) without myositis, and non-CTD/IIM. Factors associated with true positivity were determined.

Results

We analysed 342 cases. 67 (19.6%) had IIM, in whom 71 autoantibodies were detected (50 strong positives [70.4%], 21 weak positives [29.6%]). Of the strong positives, 48/50 (96.0%; 19 MSAs, 29 MAAs) were deemed true positives. Of the weak positives, 15/21 (71.4%; 3 MSAs, 12 MAAs) were deemed true positives.

In CTD without myositis cases (n = 120), 31/61 (51.0%; 5 MSAs, 26 MAAs) autoantibodies were strongly positive, with 24/31 (77.4%; 0 MSAs, 24 MAAs) true positives. 30/61 (49.2%; 13 MSAs, 17 MAAs) were weakly positive, with 16/30 (53.3%; 0 MSAs, 16 MAAs) true positives. In non-CTD/IIM cases (n = 155), all 24 MSAs and 22 MAAs were false positives; these results included 17 (37.0%; 7 MSAs, 10 MAAs) strong positives.

Individual autoantibody specificities were > 98.2 and > 97.5% for weakly and strongly positive results, respectively. True positivity was associated with high pre-test for IIM (odds ratio 50.8, 95% CI 13.7–189.2, p < 0.001) and strong positive (versus weak positive) results (4.4, 2.3–8.3, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

We demonstrated the high specificity of a myositis LIA in a clinical setting. However, a significant burden of false positive results was evident in those with a low pre-test likelihood of IIM and for weakly positive autoantibodies.

Extended myositis-specific and -associated antibodies profile in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

In systemic sclerosis (SSc) and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), auto-antibodies are used in daily practice as potent biomarkers of clinical phenotypes. This study aimed at estimating the prevalence of myositis-specific (MSA) and myositis-associated (MAA) auto-antibodies in a well-characterised SSc patients cohort using two different immunoblot assays, and studying their clinical associations.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, the sera of 300 consecutive patients were tested at the same time with myositis antibodies Euroimmun® and D-tek® immunoblot assays.

RESULTS

Prevalence of MSA/MAA, MSA and MAA were 17.0%, 8.0% and 9.7%, respectively. When combining results of both tests, anti-PM/Scl 100 were found in 5.0% (95% confidence interval 2.8; 8.1); anti-PM/Scl 75 and anti-TIF1γ in 3.7% (1.8; 6.5); anti-Ku 3.0% (1.4; 5.6); anti-MDA5 in 1.3% (0.4; 3.4); anti-Mi-2 β, anti-NXP2, anti-PL-7 and anti-SRP in 0.7% (0.08; 2.4); anti-EJ and anti-PL-12 in 0.3% (0.01; 1.8) of patients. No reactivity against SAE1, Jo-1 or OJ was observed. Anti-PM/Scl 75 antibodies were associated with interstitial lung disease (80% vs. 42%) and myositis (27% vs. 3%); anti-Ku antibodies were associated with myositis (33% vs. 3%).

CONCLUSION

In this cross-sectional study of 300 SSc patients, the prevalence of MSA/MAA, MSA and MAA using immunoblot assays were 17.0%, 8.0% and 9.7%, respectively. MAA positivity was associated with ILD and myositis, but this study did not highlight any clinical associations with MSA positivity.

Anti-Aminoacyl Transfer-RNA-Synthetases (Anti-tRNA) Autoantibodies Associated with Interstitial Lung Disease: Pulmonary Disease Progression has a Persistent Elevation of the Th17 Cytokine Profile

Anti-tRNA autoantibodies are associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), in at least two clinical scenarios: the anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). Under pathological conditions, cytokines indicate the participating elements and the course of inflammatory phenomena. We aimed to quantify serum concentrations of different inflammatory cytokines profiles in patients with anti-tRNA associated ILD (anti-tRNA-ILD) and estimate the association between these and ILD improvement and progression. Serum levels of 18 cytokines from baseline and after six months of treatment of ILD patients’ positives to anti-tRNA were included in the current study. At six months, patients were classified as with or without ILD progression. A total of 39 patients were included (10 anti-Jo1, eight anti-PL7, 11 anti-PL12, and 10 anti-Ej). Three patients (7.6%) had ILD progression (progressors patients, PP) and showed statistically higher levels in IL-4, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-22, GM-CSF, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-18, and TNF-α, compared to patients without disease progression (no progressors patients, NPP). IL-17A, IL-1β, and IL-6 (T-helper-lymphocyte (Th)17 inflammatory cytokine profile) were elevated and had a high discriminatory capacity in distinguishing ILD PP of those NPP at follow-up. Overall, there is an association between the cytokines of the Th17 inflammatory profile and the ASSD progression.

Autoantibodies to Mi-2 alpha and Mi-2 beta in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the results obtained from different assays for the detection of anti-Mi-2 antibodies, which are important markers in the diagnosis of DM.

METHODS

The study included 82 patients (68 females/14 males), most of whom had DM (n = 57), followed by PM (n = 16) and juvenile DM (n = 9). All samples were tested using a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) (Inova Diagnostics, research use only) in parallel with a line immunoassay (LIA: Euroimmun). To assess clinical specificity for the PMAT assay, a total of 775 disease and healthy controls were tested.

RESULTS

29 samples were positive by at least one test for anti-Mi-2 antibodies. Of those, 24 were Mi-2β LIA+, five were Mi-2α LIA+ and 23 Mi-2 PMAT+. The comparison shows varying agreement between the different methods (kappa 0.27-0.77). When LIA results were used as reference for receiver operating characteristics analysis, high area under the curve values were found for both PMAT vs LIA Mi-2α and LIA Mi-2β. When analysing the results in the context of the myositis phenotype, PMAT associated closest with the DM phenotype. In the control group, 3/775 controls (all low levels) were anti-Mi-2+ resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 28.1% and 99.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Overall, good agreement was found between LIA and PMAT for anti-Mi-2 antibodies, which is important for the standardization of autoantibodies. Anti-Mi-2β antibodies measured by PMAT tend be more highly associated with the clinical phenotype of DM.

Frequencies and clinical associations of myositis-related antibodies in The Netherlands: A one-year survey of all Dutch patients

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous group of connective tissue diseases, collectively known as myositis. Diagnosis of IIM is challenging while timely recognition of an IIM is of utter importance considering treatment options and otherwise irreversible (severe) long-term clinical complications. With the EULAR/ACR classification criteria (2017) considerable advancement has been made in the diagnostic workup of IIM. While these criteria take into account clinical parameters as well as presence of one autoantibody, anti-Jo-1, several autoantibodies are associated with IIM and are currently evaluated to be incorporated into classification criteria. As individual antibodies occur at low frequency, the development of line blots allowing multiplex antibody analysis has improved laboratory diagnostics for IIM. The Euroline myositis line-blot assay (Euroimmun) allows screening and semi-quantitative measurement for 15 autoantibodies, i.e. myositis specific antibodies (MSA) to SRP, EJ, OJ, Mi-2α, Mi-2β, TIF1-γ, MDA5, NXP2, SAE1, PL-12, PL-7, Jo-1 and myositis associated antibodies (MAA) to Ku, PM/Scl-75 and PM/Scl-100. To evaluate the clinical significance of detection and levels of these autoantibodies in the Netherlands, a retrospective analysis of all Dutch requests for extended myositis screening within a 1 year period was performed. A total of 187 IIM patients and 632 non-IIM patients were included. We conclude that frequencies of MSA and MAA observed in IIM patients in a routine diagnostic setting are comparable to cohort-based studies. Weak positive antibody levels show less diagnostic accuracy compared to positive antibody levels, except for anti-NXP2. Known associations between antibodies and skin involvement (anti-MDA5, anti-TIF1-γ), lung involvement (anti-Jo-1), and malignancy (anti-TIF1-γ) were confirmed in our IIM study population. The availability of multiplex antibody analyses will facilitate inclusion of additional autoantibodies in clinical myositis guidelines and help to accelerate diagnosing IMM with rare but specific antibodies.

Evaluation of a novel particle-based assay for detection of autoantibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

BACKGROUND

Myositis specific antibodies (MSA) represent not only important diagnostic tools for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), but also help to stratify patients into subsets with particular clinical features, treatment responses, and disease outcome. Consequently, standardization of MSA is of high importance. Although many laboratories rely on protein immunoprecipitation (IP) for the detection of MSA, IP standardization is challenging and therefore reliable alternatives are mandatory. Recently, we identified significant variation between IP and line immunoassay (LIA) for the detection of MSA and myositis associated antibodies. In this study we aimed to compare the results from our previous study to the results obtained with a novel fully automated particle-based technology for the detection of MSA and MAA.

METHODS

A total of 54 sera from patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) were tested using three methods: IP, LIA (Euroimmun, Germany) and a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT, Inova Diagnostics, US, research use only). The analysis focused on antibodies to EJ, SRP, Jo-1, NXP-2, MDA5, TIF1-γ, and Mi-2.

RESULTS

Significant variations were observed among all methods. Overall, the novel PMAT assays showed slightly better correlation with IP, but the kappa agreement was strongly dependent on the antibody tested. When the results obtained from IP were used as reference for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, good discrimination and a high area under the curve (AUC) value were found for PMAT (AUC = 0.83, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.70-0.95) which was significantly higher (p = .0332) than the LIA method (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.84).

CONCLUSION

The novel PMAT used to detect a spectrum of MSA in IIM represents a potential alternative to IP and other diagnostic assays. Additional studies based on larger cohorts are needed to fully assess the performance of the novel PMAT system for the detection of autoantibodies in myositis.

Dermatomyositis: Diagnosis and treatment

The second article in this continuing medical education series reviews the initial evaluation of patients with suspected dermatomyositis (DM), the relevant work-up for malignancy and interstitial lung disease once a diagnosis of DM is made, and treatment recommendations for patients with DM based on disease severity, the presence of systemic symptoms, and myositis-specific antibody (MSA) profiles. This review emphasizes the emerging role of MSAs in the diagnosis of DM and highlights how MSAs can be used to guide the appropriate work-up for malignancy and interstitial lung disease. The treatment approach proposed by this continuing medical education series discusses both established and novel therapies for DM and highlights the importance of considering lesion type, degree of muscle involvement, presence of systemic symptoms, presence of MSAs, and patient age when determining the best treatment approach for a patient with DM.

Evolution of Pulmonary Function in a Cohort of Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease and Positive for Antisynthetase Antibodies

Objective.

To describe the evolution of the pulmonary function in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who are positive for at least 1 of the antisynthetase antibodies (ASAB) after medical treatment, and to compare whether the evolution of pulmonary function is associated with the type of ASAB.

Methods.

Patients with ILD and positive for at least 1 of the ASAB (anti-Jo1, anti-PL7, anti-PL12, anti-EJ, or anti-OJ) were included. The clinical evolution, time until death or censoring, and improvement of lung disease were registered.

Results.

The study included 118 patients. Most of the patients had a high extent of ground glass opacities in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and low extent of fibrosis. In the final evaluation of pulmonary function (median 749.5 days of followup), 67% of the patients had lung disease improvement. The improvement occurred within the first 6 months after initiating medical treatment; thereafter, pulmonary function remained stable in most of the patients. A decrease of the extent of ground glass opacities was demonstrated in HRCT at followup in those patients with pulmonary improvement. No differences were observed in the percentage of patients who achieved improvement between the ASAB groups, or in survival.

Conclusion.

Improvement of pulmonary function was observed in 67% of the patients. Improvement was observed in all ASAB groups and occurred within 6 months after initiating medical treatment.

Focused HLA analysis in Caucasians with myositis identifies significant associations with autoantibody subgroups

Objectives

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a spectrum of rare autoimmune diseases characterised clinically by muscle weakness and heterogeneous systemic organ involvement. The strongest genetic risk is within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Since autoantibody presence defines specific clinical subgroups of IIM, we aimed to correlate serotype and genotype, to identify novel risk variants in the MHC region that co-occur with IIM autoantibodies.

Methods

We collected available autoantibody data in our cohort of 2582 Caucasian patients with IIM. High resolution human leucocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and corresponding amino acid sequences were imputed using SNP2HLA from existing genotyping data and tested for association with 12 autoantibody subgroups.

Results

We report associations with eight autoantibodies reaching our study-wide significance level of p<2.9×10^–5. Associations with the 8.1 ancestral haplotype were found with anti-Jo-1 (HLA-B*08:01, p=2.28×10^–53 and HLA-DRB1*03:01, p=3.25×10^–9), anti-PM/Scl (HLA-DQB1*02:01, p=1.47×10^–26) and anti-cN1A autoantibodies (HLA-DRB1*03:01, p=1.40×10^–11). Associations independent of this haplotype were found with anti-Mi-2 (HLA-DRB1*07:01, p=4.92×10^–13) and anti-HMGCR autoantibodies (HLA-DRB1*11, p=5.09×10^–6). Amino acid positions may be more strongly associated than classical HLA associations; for example with anti-Jo-1 autoantibodies and position 74 of HLA-DRB1 (p=3.47×10^–64) and position 9 of HLA-B (p=7.03×10^–11). We report novel genetic associations with HLA-DQB1 anti-TIF1 autoantibodies and identify haplotypes that may differ between adult-onset and juvenile-onset patients with these autoantibodies.

Conclusions

These findings provide new insights regarding the functional consequences of genetic polymorphisms within the MHC. As autoantibodies in IIM correlate with specific clinical features of disease, understanding genetic risk underlying development of autoantibody profiles has implications for future research.

Comparison of Three Immunoassays for the Detection of Myositis Specific Antibodies

Objectives: Standardization of myositis specific antibody (MSA) detection is of high importance because these antibodies are relevant for diagnosis and stratification of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) and have the potential to be used in classification criteria. Many laboratories rely on immunoprecipitation (IP) for the detection of MSA but this approach is compromised by logistic, standardization, and regulatory challenges. Therefore, reliable alternatives to IP are mandatory. Here we aimed to compare three methods for the detection of MSA.

Methods: Our study initiated from a cohort of 1,619 IIM patients (BIRD/University of Bath serology service and UKMyoNet cohorts) and resulted in 157 unique serum samples enriched for higher prevalence of MSA characterized by the laboratory's routine methods, IP and line immunoassay (LIA: Euroimmun). All samples were tested using a novel fully automated particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT, Inova Diagnostics, research use only). Analyses included antibodies to PL-7, PL-12, SRP, NXP2, Mi-2, SAE, EJ, MDA5, TIF1γ, SRP, NXP2.

Results: Overall high agreements were observed between novel methods (LIA and PMAT) and IP (Cohen's kappa 0.46–0.96) for the detection of MSA. Lowest level of agreement was found for EJ and highest for SAE.

Conclusion: The data hold promise for advancements in standardization of MSA assays as well as for the potential inclusion of MSA in future classification criteria.