Drug initiation and escalation strategies of vasodilator therapies for Raynaud's phenomenon: can we treat to target?

Systemic pharmacotherapy approaches for the treatment of systemic sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) represents a complex, multisystem rheumatologic disorder characterized by immune dysregulation, vascular dysfunction, and multi-organ fibrosis. This review discusses the efficacy of the available therapeutic options and the significance of developing effective strategies against its varied manifestations, pivotal to improving patient outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

The review elaborates on the pharmacological treatments available for managing key manifestations of SSc, including skin and lung involvement, and vascular complications, as well as the most recent findings in the field. We evaluated recent literature and clinical trials from the past decade, as well as most recent guidelines from entities like EULAR and the ACR, to provide a comprehensive overview of current management strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite advancements in therapeutic options, SSc remains a challenging disease to manage due to its complexity, our relatively limited understanding of disease pathogenesis, and its severe impact on quality of life. The development of targeted therapies and the refinement of existing treatment protocols offer hope for better management. Future research should focus on personalized medicine approaches and refining treatment algorithms to optimize outcomes for patients.

[Systemic sclerosis]

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a very heterogeneous, chronic, rare, but socioeconomically important disease with a severe disease course and severe impairment of the quality of life of affected patients.

OBJECTIVES

Overview of the current state of research on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of SSc.

METHODS

A literature search was performed.

RESULTS

The pathogenesis of SSc is not fully understood. ACR/EULAR criteria allow the diagnosis of early forms of SSc. Classification into limited cutaneous SSc and diffuse cutaneous SSc is of prognostic and therapeutic relevance. New organ-specific treatment options for SSc have led to improved quality of life and prognosis.

MRI Digital Artery Volume Index (DAVIX) as a surrogate outcome measure of digital ulcer disease in patients with systemic sclerosis: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Vascular fibrosis is a key manifestation of systemic sclerosis that leads to the narrowing of small and medium arteries, causing vascular clinical manifestations including digital ulcers and pulmonary arterial hypertension. We investigated the potential of the MRI-based Digital Artery Volume Index (DAVIX) as a surrogate outcome measure of vascular fibrosis by using it to quantify and predict the burden of digital ulcer disease in patients with systemic sclerosis.

METHODS

Two independent cohorts of patients participating in the prospective observational study STRIKE were consecutively enrolled from the Scleroderma Clinic of the Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and fulfilled the very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (VEDOSS) or the 2013 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) systemic sclerosis classification criteria. DAVIX was calculated as the percentage mean of the ratio of digital artery volume to finger volume in the four fingers of the dominant hand. Data were collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up, and the primary outcome was the presence of digital ulcers at 12-month follow-up.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 7, 2018, and April 11, 2022, we included 85 patients in the exploratory cohort and 150 in the validation cohort. In the exploratory cohort, the mean age was 54·5 years (SD 11·6), 75 (88%) of 85 patients were women, ten (12%) were men, and 69 (82%) were White. In the validation cohort, the mean age was 53·5 years (SD 13·8), 136 (91%) of 150 patients were women, 14 (9%) were men, and 127 (85%) were White. In the exploratory cohort, DAVIX was significantly lower in patients with previous or active digital ulcers (0·34% [IQR 0·16-0·69]) than in those without digital ulcer disease (0·65% [0·42-0·88]; p=0·015); this finding was substantiated in the validation cohort (0·43% [0·20-0·73] vs 0·73% [0·53-0·97]; p<0·0001). Patients who developed new digital ulcers during 12-month follow-up had a lower DAVIX (0·23% [0·10-0·66]) than those who did not (0·65% [0·45-0·91]; p=0·0039). DAVIX was negatively correlated with disease duration (r=-0·415; p<0·0001), the ratio of forced vital capacity to the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (r=-0·334; p=0·0091), nailfold capillaroscopy pattern (r=-0·447; p<0·0001), and baseline modified Rodnan skin score (r=-0·305; p=0·014) and was positively correlated with the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (r=0·368; p=0·0041). DAVIX was negatively correlated with change in score on the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (r=-0·308; p=0·024), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Raynaud's (r=-0·271; p=0·044), and VAS digital ulcers (r=-0·291; p=0·044).

INTERPRETATION

DAVIX is a promising surrogate outcome measure of digital ulcer disease in patients with systemic sclerosis. The ability of DAVIX to non-invasively predict future digital ulcers and worsening of patient-reported outcomes could aid patient enrichment and stratification in clinical trials. Clinically, DAVIX could offer insights into the assessment of vascular activity. The sensitivity of DAVIX to change over time and with treatment will establish its value as an imaging outcome measure of vascular disease.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre and University of Leeds Industry Engagement Accelerator Fund.

Treatment of Vascular Complications in Systemic Sclerosis: What Is the Best Approach to Diagnosis and Management of Renal Crisis and Digital Ulcers?

Vasculopathy as exemplified by scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) and digital ulcers (DUs) is a cardinal feature of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and is associated with significant morbidity, including in patients with early disease. Prompt recognition and management is required to alleviate potentially irreversible damage from SSc-associated vasculopathy. Both SRC and DUs share many etiopathogenic drivers which inform the therapeutic strategy. The aim of our review was to describe the diagnosis and management of SRC and DUs in SSc, and to discuss unmet needs for future research.

Ultrasound Classification of Finger Pulp Blood Flow in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

To define a semiquantitative classification of finger pulp blood flow (FPBF) and to evaluate whether this classification could be used to assess FPBF in healthy controls and in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients.

METHODS

Thirty controls and 86 SSc patients were consecutively included. A classification of FPBF including 5 grades (from grade 0 [no signal] to 4 [signal detected on the entire finger pulp, including the subepidermal vascular network]) was evaluated. This classification was explored in basal conditions and after hand baths in hot and cold water in controls. Its relevance was also assessed at room temperature in SSc patients.

RESULTS

In controls, power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) of FPBF was improved after hot challenge (P = 0.024), whereas cold challenge decreased FPBF (P = 0.001). FPBF correlated with the vasodilation status assessed by the resistivity index of radial arteries (Spearman's correlation coefficient = -0.50, P = 0.0049). Grade 0 was more frequent in SSc patients than in controls (22.1% versus 3.3%; P < 0.05). In SSc patients, grade 0 was associated with severity markers of the digital vasculopathy such as digital ulcers (DUs) (current or past) (P < 0.05) or ulnar artery occlusion (P < 0.05). On the other hand, DUs were less frequent in patients with grade 4 (P < 0.05). A pathologic threshold of <2 (grade 0 or 1) was significantly associated with DUs (odds ratio 6.67 [95% confidence interval 2.31-19.21], P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

PDUS allowed a semiquantitative evaluation of FBPF in SSc patients and controls. Further studies are warranted to validate these results in independent SSc populations and to compare PDUS to existing tools assessing digital blood flow.

Practical management of Raynaud's phenomenon - a primer for practicing physicians

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is a common vasospastic condition that results in digital hypoperfusion in response to cold and/or emotional stress and is associated with significant pain and disability. The aim of our review is to provide a practical approach for clinicians to inform assessment and management of patients with RP.

RECENT FINDINGS

Autoantibodies and nailfold capillaroscopy are key investigations to stratify the risk of progression to systemic sclerosis (SSc) in patients RP, which was recently confirmed in the multicenter, very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (VEDOSS) project. Research has explored the complex lived-patient experience of RP including digital vasculopathy in SSc and has highlighted the need for outcome measure development to facilitate research in the field. Pharmacological treatment strategies vary significantly internationally and there is continued interest in developing surgical approaches.

SUMMARY

We provide a practical and up-to-date approach to inform the assessment and management of patients with RP including guidance on drug initiation and escalation. Calcium channel blockers are first-line treatment and can be initiated by primary care physicians. We also highlight second-line drug therapies used for refractory RP and the potential role for surgical intervention.

The clinical relevance of Raynaud's phenomenon symptom characteristics in systemic sclerosis

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is a cardinal feature of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and manifests with pain, digital colour change, sensory symptoms, and impaired function. SSc-RP is exacerbated by cold exposure (RP 'attacks') but many patients report persistent symptoms of background digital ischaemia. The aim of our study was to examine the significance of RP with digital colour change with or without symptoms, and persistent colour change in between attacks. Patients with SSc responses were obtained from the Patient Survey of experiences of Raynaud's Phenomenon (PASRAP). We enquired about symptoms associated with Raynaud's attacks, and persistent symptoms in between attacks. Data were analysed as descriptive statistics with appropriate parametric/non-parametric testing. Relevant PASRAP survey question data from 747 evaluable SSc patients from across three continents were analysed. Isolated colour change was rare (29/484, 6%). Digital ulcers were more common in SSc-RP associated with other sensory symptoms (42.1% vs. 24.1%, P=0.057) and more readily treated with phosphodiesterase-type 5 inhibitors (22.5% vs. 10.3%%, P=0.124). Over one-third of patients (n=92/239, 38%) reported persistent colour change in between Raynaud's attacks. Patients with persistent colour change were more likely to have pulmonary arterial hypertension (15.2% vs. 7.5%, P=0.057) and be treated with calcium channel blockers (54.3% vs. 39.0%, P=0.021). SSc-RP with colour change and other symptoms and/or or persistent decolourisation in between attacks were more likely to have vascular complications of SSc and be treated with vascular therapies. Future research should explore the judicious use of vascular therapies as a potential form of disease modification in SSc. Key Points • Isolated colour change without other symptoms is rare in SSc patients. • SSc patients often identify persistent symptoms in between attacks of RP. • SSc-RP with colour change and other symptoms, or persistent decolourisation, may have greater disease severity and be treated with vascular therapies.

Raynaud's Phenomenon with Focus on Systemic Sclerosis

Raynaud’s phenomenon is a painful vascular condition in which abnormal vasoconstriction of the digital arteries causes blanching of the skin. The treatment approach can vary depending on the underlying cause of disease. Raynaud’s phenomenon can present as a primary symptom, in which there is no evidence of underlying disease, or secondary to a range of medical conditions or therapies. Systemic sclerosis is one of the most frequent causes of secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon; its appearance may occur long before other signs and symptoms. Timely, accurate identification of secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon may accelerate a final diagnosis and positively alter prognosis. Capillaroscopy is fundamental in the diagnosis and differentiation of primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon. It is helpful in the very early stages of systemic sclerosis, along with its role in disease monitoring. An extensive range of pharmacotherapies with various routes of administration are available for Raynaud’s phenomenon but a standardized therapeutic plan is still lacking. This review provides insight into recent advances in the understanding of Raynaud’s phenomenon pathophysiology, diagnostic methods, and treatment approaches.

An Overview of Different Techniques for Improving the Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary in Systemic Sclerosis Patients

In systemic sclerosis (SSc) mortality is mainly linked to lung involvement which is characterized by interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH). In SSc, PH may be due to different etiologies, including ILD, chronic thromboembolic disease, pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The main tool to screen PAH is transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which has a sensitivity of 90%, even if definitive diagnosis should be confirmed by right heart catheterization (RHC). The radiological evaluation (i.e., HRTC) plays an important role in defining the possible causes and in monitoring the evolution of lung damage. For PAH, identifying individuals who have borderline elevation of pulmonary arterial pressure needs to be appropriately managed and followed. In the past few years, the strategy for the management of PAH has significantly evolved and new trials are underway to test other therapies. This review provides an overview of the tools to evaluate PAH in SSc patients and on treatment options for these patients.

Factors influencing patient decision-making concerning treatment escalation in Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To explore patient priorities and ranking of factors influencing patient decision-making concerning treatment escalation in the management of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) secondary to systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

SSc patients were invited to participate in an online survey disseminated through patient-led organisations and social media platforms.

RESULTS

Responses from 747 people with self-reported SSc-RP were evaluable with broad international representation. The mean age (54.7years, SD 12.1), clinical phenotype and disease subsets distribution (limited [402/747, 53.8%], diffuse [260/747, 34.8%] and overlap disease, 85/747 [11.4%]) were consistent with expected demographics. Around half (56.3%) of patients reported their SSc-RP symptoms were adequately controlled. The 5 highest-ranked (out of 13) factors that would prompt treatment escalation for SSc-RP were; 1) inability to use the fingers properly 2) emergence of new digital ulcer (DU) on one or more fingers, 3) worsening pain or discomfort of Raynaud's, 4) more severe attacks, and 5) if it may help with internal problems. Despite symptoms not being adequately controlled, 47.1% were concerned about potential treatment side effects and were more likely to accept 'mild' (~20-40%) vs. 'severe' (2%) side effects. Patients were open to different management strategies for uncontrolled Raynaud's that included adding new treatment in combination to existing (52.8%), drug substitution (40.9%), increasing the current dose (28.8%), or focussing on non-pharmacological approaches (29.7%).

CONCLUSION

We have identified the relative importance of different factors influencing patient-preferences for treatment decision-making for SSc-RP. Side-effects profiles influence acceptability of drug treatments and many patients report a preference for non-pharmacological management of SSc-RP.

Raynaud's phenomenon

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is a common vasospastic condition which affects ~5% of the general population. The majority of individuals have primary RP; however, Raynaud's can also occur secondary to a broad range of underlying medical conditions and drug therapies. RP is a cardinal feature in patients with systemic sclerosis and is often the earliest symptom of the disease. Unlike primary RP, patients with secondary RP can develop persistent digital ischaemia, including ulcers and gangrene. Patients require a comprehensive clinical assessment and investigation, in particular, the detection of autoantibodies and nailfold capillaroscopic abnormalities. Non-pharmacological management is indicated in all patients. There are a wide range of available drug therapies to treat RP, including when complicated by digital ulceration, and surgical intervention is sometimes required. Future research is needed to understand the complex pathogenesis of RP and to measure the impact and severity of RP to develop optimised approaches to management.

Correction to: How do patients define Raynaud's phenomenon? Differences between primary and secondary disease

INTRODUCTION/ OBJECTIVES:

To examine how people define Raynaud’s Phenomenon (RP), based on their lived experiences and explore if differences exist depending on primary or secondary RP diagnosis.

METHOD:

An international survey was sent to people with RP through health systems, foundations, and social media. Qualitative coding of responses to an open text question regarding one’s own definition of RP was performed and themes were identified. Prevalence of themes among the sample and then comparisons between themes among people who self-reported primary versus secondary diagnosis of RP were performed.

RESULTS:

There were 1345 respondents from 45 countries (mean age 51.5 years, 93% female) who defined RP in their own words; 17% reported primary RP and 83% reported secondary RP (69% of secondary RP was scleroderma-related, n = 927). Over half defined their RP by describing the body parts affected, color changes, pain, and triggers or situations in which an episode occurs. Patients with primary RP more frequently defined RP in terms of its impact on function/quality of life and pain compared to those with secondary RP (34.5% versus 25.3% respectively, p=0.004; 54.0% versus 46.8%, p=0.05). Patients with secondary RP more frequently included specific body parts, color change, the management of attacks and other digital vascular complications in their definition of RP.

CONCLUSIONS:

We have identified differences in how people with primary and secondary RP define RP, in terms of how they feel and function. Our findings have implications for the domains of outcome measures for assessing RP within different patient populations.

How do patients define Raynaud's phenomenon? Differences between primary and secondary disease

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

To examine how people define Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) based on their lived experiences and explore if differences exist depending on primary or secondary RP diagnosis.

METHOD

An international survey was sent to people with RP through health systems, foundations, and social media. Qualitative coding of responses to an open text question regarding one's own definition of RP was performed and themes were identified. The prevalence of themes among the sample and then comparisons between themes among people who self-reported primary versus secondary diagnosis of RP were performed.

RESULTS

There were 1345 respondents from 45 countries (mean age 51.5 years, 93% female) who defined RP in their own words; 17% reported primary RP and 83% reported secondary RP (69% of secondary RP was scleroderma-related, n = 927). Over half defined their RP by describing the body parts affected, color changes, pain, and triggers or situations in which an episode occurs. Patients with primary RP more frequently defined RP in terms of its impact on function/quality of life and pain compared to those with secondary RP (34.5% versus 25.3%, respectively, p=0.004; 54.0% versus 46.8%, p=0.05). Patients with secondary RP more frequently included specific body parts, color change, the management of attacks, and other digital vascular complications in their definition of RP.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified differences in how people with primary and secondary RP define RP, in terms of how they feel and function. Our findings have implications for the domains of outcome measures for assessing RP within different patient populations. Key Points • Pain is more often mentioned in primary RP and color change in secondary RP. • Over 25% of patients included reduced the quality of life as part of their RP definition. • The concept of "attack" is used to define RP by only 2% of patients.

Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis

Raynaud phenomenon is a symptom complex caused by impaired digital perfusion and can occur as a primary phenomenon or secondary to a wide range of underlying causes. Raynaud phenomenon occurs in virtually all patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and is often the earliest clinical manifestation to occur. Careful assessment is required in patients with Raynaud phenomenon to avoid missing secondary causes such as SSc. Digital ulcers are a painful and disabling visible manifestation of digital vascular injury in patients with SSc. Progress has been made in the classification and assessment of digital ulcers and in understanding ulcer pathogenesis, and there are a wide range of treatments available to both prevent and heal digital ulcers, some of which are also used in Raynaud phenomenon management. In this Review, the assessment of patients with Raynaud phenomenon is discussed, including 'red flags' that are suggestive of SSc. The pathogenesis, classification and assessment of SSc-associated digital ulcers are also covered, alongside an overview of management approaches for SSc-associated Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers. Finally, unmet needs are discussed and the concept of a unified vascular phenotype in which therapies that affect the vasculature to support disease modification strategies is introduced.