• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4594882)   Today's Articles (4727)   Subscriber (49326)
For: Dance DR, Hunt RA, Bakic PR, Maidment ADA, Sandborg M, Ullman G, Alm Carlsson G. Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:359-63. [PMID: 15933137 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Ramnarain J, Cartwright L, Diffey J. Trends in patient dose and compression force for digital (DR) mammography systems over an eleven-year period. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024;47:215-222. [PMID: 38019445 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01357-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
2
Marshall NW, Bosmans H. Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis systems: physical methods and experimental data. Phys Med Biol 2022;67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9a35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
3
Yamamuro M, Asai Y, Hashimoto N, Yasuda N, Kimura H, Yamada T, Nemoto M, Kimura Y, Handa H, Yoshida H, Abe K, Tada M, Habe H, Nagaoka T, Nin S, Ishii K, Kondo Y. Utility of U-Net for the objective segmentation of the fibroglandular tissue region on clinical digital mammograms. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2022;8. [PMID: 35728581 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac7ada] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
4
Avramova-Cholakova S, Kulama E, Daskalov S, Loveland J. PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SYSTEMS WITH FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS AND CONTRAST-ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2021;197:212-229. [PMID: 34977945 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncab172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
5
Barufaldi B, Maidment ADA, Dustler M, Axelsson R, Tomic H, Zackrisson S, Tingberg A, Bakic PR. VIRTUAL CLINICAL TRIALS IN MEDICAL IMAGING SYSTEM EVALUATION AND OPTIMISATION. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2021;195:363-371. [PMID: 34144597 PMCID: PMC8507451 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncab080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
6
Teuwen J, Moriakov N, Fedon C, Caballo M, Reiser I, Bakic P, García E, Diaz O, Michielsen K, Sechopoulos I. Deep learning reconstruction of digital breast tomosynthesis images for accurate breast density and patient-specific radiation dose estimation. Med Image Anal 2021;71:102061. [PMID: 33910108 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
7
Fedon C, Caballo M, García E, Diaz O, Boone JM, Dance DR, Sechopoulos I. Fibroglandular tissue distribution in the breast during mammography and tomosynthesis based on breast CT data: A patient-based characterization of the breast parenchyma. Med Phys 2021;48:1436-1447. [PMID: 33452822 PMCID: PMC7986202 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]  Open
8
Bliznakova K. The advent of anthropomorphic three-dimensional breast phantoms for X-ray imaging. Phys Med 2020;79:145-161. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]  Open
9
Mammography dose estimates do not reflect any specific patient's breast dose. Eur J Radiol 2020;131:109216. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
10
Glandular dose indices using a glandular dose to air kerma volume histogram in mammography. Med Phys 2020;47:1340-1348. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]  Open
11
Chang TY, Lai KJ, Tu CY, Wu J. Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography. Sci Rep 2020;10:2234. [PMID: 32042071 PMCID: PMC7010737 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59317-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]  Open
12
M Ali R, England A, Mercer CE, Tootell A, Hogg P. Calculating Individual Lifetime Effective Risk from Initial Mean Glandular Dose Arising from the First Screening Mammogram. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2018;49:406-413. [PMID: 30514558 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
13
Caballo M, Fedon C, Brombal L, Mann R, Longo R, Sechopoulos I. Development of 3D patient-based super-resolution digital breast phantoms using machine learning. Phys Med Biol 2018;63:225017. [PMID: 30418943 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae78d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
14
Normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and dedicated breast CT. Phys Med 2018;55:142-148. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Revised: 09/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]  Open
15
Prediction of glandularity and breast radiation dose from mammography results in Japanese women. Med Biol Eng Comput 2018;57:289-298. [PMID: 30099671 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-018-1882-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
16
Massera RT, Tomal A. Skin models and their impact on mean glandular dose in mammography. Phys Med 2018;51:38-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]  Open
17
Homogeneous vs. patient specific breast models for Monte Carlo evaluation of mean glandular dose in mammography. Phys Med 2018;51:56-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.04.392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Revised: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]  Open
18
Fedon C, Caballo M, Sechopoulos I. Internal breast dosimetry in mammography: Monte Carlo validation in homogeneous and anthropomorphic breast phantoms with a clinical mammography system. Med Phys 2018;45:3950-3961. [PMID: 29956334 PMCID: PMC6099211 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]  Open
19
Suleiman ME, Brennan PC, Ekpo E, Kench P, McEntee MF. Integrating mammographic breast density in glandular dose calculation. Br J Radiol 2018;91:20180032. [PMID: 29400552 PMCID: PMC6190790 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]  Open
20
Fedon C, Caballo M, Longo R, Trianni A, Sechopoulos I. Internal breast dosimetry in mammography: Experimental methods and Monte Carlo validation with a monoenergetic x-ray beam. Med Phys 2018;45:1724-1737. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]  Open
21
Østerås BH, Skaane P, Gullien R, Martinsen ACT. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018;63:035006. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
22
Traino AC, Sottocornola C, Barca P, Marini C, Aringhieri G, Caramella D, Fantacci ME. Average absorbed breast dose in mammography: a new possible dose index matching the requirements of the European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM. Eur Radiol Exp 2017;1:28. [PMID: 29708206 PMCID: PMC5909362 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-017-0026-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]  Open
23
Boone JM, Hernandez AM, Seibert JA. Two-dimensional breast dosimetry improved using three-dimensional breast image data. Radiol Phys Technol 2017;10:129-141. [PMID: 28573551 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-017-0404-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
24
Wang W, Qiu R, Ren L, Liu H, Wu Z, Li C, Niu Y, Li J. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model. Med Phys 2017;44:2503-2514. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2016] [Revised: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]  Open
25
Dance DR, Sechopoulos I. Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging. Phys Med Biol 2016;61:R271-R304. [PMID: 27617767 PMCID: PMC5061150 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/19/r271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
26
Hernandez AM, Seibert JA, Boone JM. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered. Med Phys 2016;42:6337-48. [PMID: 26520725 DOI: 10.1118/1.4931966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
27
Hendrick RE, Tredennick T. Benefit to Radiation Risk of Breast-specific Gamma Imaging Compared with Mammography in Screening Asymptomatic Women with Dense Breasts. Radiology 2016;281:583-588. [PMID: 27257949 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
28
Geeraert N, Klausz R, Muller S, Bloch I, Bosmans H. INDIVIDUALISED CALCULATION OF TISSUE IMPARTED ENERGY IN BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2016;169:267-273. [PMID: 27127209 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncw106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
29
New method for generating breast models featuring glandular tissue spatial distribution. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
30
Young KC, Oduko JM. Radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme in 2010 to 2012. Br J Radiol 2015;89:20150831. [PMID: 26654386 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]  Open
31
Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom. Phys Med 2015;31:785-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2015] [Revised: 02/27/2015] [Accepted: 03/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]  Open
32
Bouwman RW, van Engen RE, Young KC, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJM, Schopphoven S, Jeukens CRLPN, Veldkamp WJH, Dance DR. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:7893-907. [PMID: 26407015 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/20/7893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
33
Geeraert N, Klausz R, Muller S, Bloch I, Bosmans H. Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2015;165:342-345. [PMID: 25897143 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
34
Sechopoulos I, Sabol JM, Berglund J, Bolch WE, Brateman L, Christodoulou E, Flynn M, Geiser W, Goodsitt M, Jones AK, Lo JY, Maidment ADA, Nishino K, Nosratieh A, Ren B, Segars WP, Von Tiedemann M. Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223. Med Phys 2015;41:091501. [PMID: 25186375 DOI: 10.1118/1.4892600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
35
Bouwman RW, van Engen RE, Young KC, Veldkamp WJH, Dance DR. Dose assessment in contrast enhanced digital mammography using simple phantoms simulating standard model breasts. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:N1-7. [PMID: 25500435 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/1/n1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
36
Dance DR, Young KC. Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys Med Biol 2014;59:2127-37. [PMID: 24699200 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/9/2127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
37
Feng SSJ, Patel B, Sechopoulos I. Objective models of compressed breast shapes undergoing mammography. Med Phys 2013;40:031902. [PMID: 23464317 DOI: 10.1118/1.4789579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]  Open
38
Bouwman RW, Diaz O, van Engen RE, Young KC, den Heeten GJ, Broeders MJM, Veldkamp WJH, Dance DR. Phantoms for quality control procedures in digital breast tomosynthesis: dose assessment. Phys Med Biol 2013;58:4423-38. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/4423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
39
Sechopoulos I, Bliznakova K, Qin X, Fei B, Feng SSJ. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry. Med Phys 2012;39:5050-9. [PMID: 22894430 DOI: 10.1118/1.4737025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
40
Bakic PR, Zhang C, Maidment ADA. Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm. Med Phys 2011;38:3165-76. [PMID: 21815391 DOI: 10.1118/1.3590357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
41
Crotty DJ, Brady SL, Jackson DC, Toncheva GI, Anderson CE, Yoshizumi TT, Tornai MP. Evaluation of the absorbed dose to the breast using radiochromic film in a dedicated CT mammotomography system employing a quasi-monochromatic x-ray beam. Med Phys 2011;38:3232-45. [PMID: 21815398 PMCID: PMC3125086 DOI: 10.1118/1.3574875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2010] [Revised: 03/16/2011] [Accepted: 03/17/2011] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
42
Paquerault S. Breast imaging going virtual: is that a reality? Acad Radiol 2011;18:533-5. [PMID: 21474057 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2011] [Revised: 02/22/2011] [Accepted: 02/22/2011] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
43
Yi Y, Lai CJ, Han T, Zhong Y, Shen Y, Liu X, Ge S, You Z, Wang T, Shaw CC. Radiation doses in cone-beam breast computed tomography: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Med Phys 2011;38:589-97. [PMID: 21452696 DOI: 10.1118/1.3521469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
44
Freed M, de Zwart JA, Loud JT, El Khouli RH, Myers KJ, Greene MH, Duyn JH, Badano A. An anthropomorphic phantom for quantitative evaluation of breast MRI. Med Phys 2011;38:743-53. [PMID: 21452712 PMCID: PMC3033878 DOI: 10.1118/1.3533899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2010] [Revised: 12/13/2010] [Accepted: 12/14/2010] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]  Open
45
Bliznakova K, Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Pallikarakis N. Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography. Med Phys 2011;37:5604-17. [PMID: 21158272 DOI: 10.1118/1.3491812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
46
Dance DR, Young KC, van Engen RE. Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys Med Biol 2010;56:453-71. [PMID: 21191150 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/2/011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
47
Cassola VF, Hoff G. Estudo comparativo de dosimetria computacional entre modelos homogêneos e um modelo voxel em mamografia: uma discussão de aplicações em testes de constância e cálculo de dose glandular em pacientes. Radiol Bras 2010. [DOI: 10.1590/s0100-39842010000600012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
48
Experimental validation of a radiographic simulation code using breast phantom for X-ray imaging. Comput Biol Med 2010;40:208-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2009] [Revised: 10/19/2009] [Accepted: 11/30/2009] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
49
Ma AKW, Gunn S, Darambara DG. Introducing DeBRa: a detailed breast model for radiological studies. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:4533-45. [PMID: 19556683 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
50
Dance DR, Young KC, van Engen RE. Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:4361-72. [PMID: 19550001 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 2 12Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA