Patient dose for computed tomography examination: dose reference levels and effective doses based on a national survey of 2013 in Korea

Proposing Multiregional Diagnostic Reference Levels for Common CT Angiography Examinations in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVES

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are crucial tools for optimizing radiation exposure during different radiological examinations. This study aimed to establish preliminary DRLs for commonly performed computed tomographic angiography (CTA) examinations in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Data for three types of CTA examinations (cerebral, pulmonary, and lower-extremity) were collected from six medical cities across Saudi Arabia. Data sets related to 723 CTAs with a mean patient weight of 75 kg were analysed in detail. The DRL values were determined based on the 75th, median, and 25th CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) values.

RESULTS

The established DRLs were 1221 mGy cm for cerebral CTAs, 475 mGy cm for pulmonary CTAs, and 1040 mGy cm for lower-extremity CTAs. These values were comparable to those reported in other studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary DRLs for three common CTA procedures in Saudi Arabia. The widespread implementation of a low kVp and a high level of image reconstruction (IR) presents an opportunity for further dose reduction. These findings can serve as a foundation for future nationwide DRL surveys and the optimization of CTA imaging protocols in Saudi Arabia.

ESTIMATION OF PATIENT RADIATION DOSES FROM MULTI-DETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY PROCEDURES IN TANZANIA

The aim of the present study was to estimate the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) to patients from five multi-detector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) procedures: brain, carotid, coronary, entire aorta and lower limb from four medical institutions in Tanzania; to compare these doses to those reported in the literature, and to compare the data obtained with ICRP 103 and Monte Carlo software. The radiation doses for 217 patients were estimated using patient demographics, patient-related exposure parameters, the geometry of examination and CT-Expo V 2.4 Monte Carlo-based software. The median values of the CTDIvol, DLP and ED for MDCTA procedures of the brain and carotids were 36.8 mGy, 1481.0 mGy∙cm and 5.2 mSv, and 15.9 mGy, 1224.0 mGy∙cm and 7.8 mSv, respectively; while for the coronary, entire aortic, and lower limbs were 49.4 mGy, 1493.0 mGy∙cm and 30.6 mSv; 16.2 mGy, 2287.0 mGy∙cm and 41.1 mSv; and 6.4 mGy, 1406.0 mGy∙cm and 10.5 mSv, respectively. The ratio of the maximum to minimum ED values to individual patients across the four medical centers were 41.4, 11.1, 4.6, 9.5 and 37.4, respectively, for the brain, carotid, coronary, entire aortic and lower limb CT angiography procedures. The mean values of CTDIvol, DLP and ED in the present study were typically higher than the values reported from Kenya, Korea and Saudi Arabia. The 75th percentile values of the DLP were above the preliminary diagnostic references levels proposed by Kenya, Switzerland and Korea. The observed wide range of examination scanning protocols and patient doses for similar MDCTA procedures within and across hospitals; and the observed relatively high patient doses compared to those reported in the literature, call for the need to standardize scanning protocols and optimise patient dose from MDCTA procedures.

Computed tomography diagnostic reference levels for adult brain, chest and abdominal examinations: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Radiation dose variation within and among Computed Tomography (CT) centres is commonly reported. This work systematically reviewed published articles on adult Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for the brain, chest and abdomen to determine the causes and extent of variation. A systematic literature search and review was performed in selected databases containing leading journals in radiography, radiology and medical physics using carefully defined search terms related to CT and DRLs. The quality of the included articles was determined using the Effective Public Health Practise Project tool for quantitative studies.

KEY FINDINGS

The 54 articles reviewed include: 45 studies using human data, 8 studies using phantom data, and one study with both human and phantom data. The main comparator in between studies was the dose indices used in reporting DRLs. DRL variations of up to a factor of 2 for the same procedure were noted in phantom studies, and up to a factor of 3 in human studies. Sources of variation include the type of scanner, the age of the scanner, differences in protocols, variations in patients, as well as variations in study design. Different combinations of dose indices were reported: volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) (59%); DLP only (11%); weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDIw) and DLP (9%); CTDIvol only (7%); CTDIvol, DLP and effective dose (ED) (6%); CTDIw only (4%); CTDIvol, DLP and size specific dose estimate (SSDE) (1%) and CTDIw, CTDIvol and DLP (1%). The use of different dose indices limited dose comparison between studies.

CONCLUSION

The study noted a 2-3 fold variation in DRLs between studies for the same procedure. The causes of variation are reported and include study design, scanner technology and the use of different dose indices.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There is a need for standardisation of CT DRLs in line with the International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations to reduce dose variation and facilitate dose comparison.

Evaluation of Impact of Factors Affecting CT Radiation Dose for Optimizing Patient Dose Levels

The dose metrics and factors influencing radiation exposure for patients undergoing head, chest, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans were investigated for optimization of patient dose levels. The local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of adult CT scans performed in our hospital were established based on 28,147 consecutive examinations, including 5510 head scans, 9091 chest scans, and 13,526 abdominal scans. Among the six CT scanners used in our hospital, four of them are 64-slice multi-detector CT units (MDCT64), and the other two have detector slices higher than 64 (MDCTH). Multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of body size, kVp, mAs, and pitch on volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). The local DRLs expressed in terms of the 75th percentile of CTDIvol for the head, chest, and abdominal scans performed on MDCT64 were 59.32, 9.24, and 10.64 mGy, respectively. The corresponding results for MDCTH were 57.90, 7.67, and 9.86 mGy. In regard to multivariate analysis, CTDIvol showed various dependence on the predictors investigated in this study. All regression relationships have coefficient of determination (R2) larger than 0.75, indicating a good fit to the data. Overall, the research results obtained through our workflow could facilitate the modification of CT imaging procedures once the local DRLs are unusually high compared to the national DRLs.

A systematic review on the current status of adult diagnostic reference levels in head, chest and abdominopelvic Computed Tomography

Computed tomography (CT) is a routinely employed diagnostic tool for the detection and diagnosis of disease processes. Despite the primary focus of radiation dose reduction and improvements in CT scanners, radiation dose exposure remains an ever-increasing concern. Scanning protocol optimisation relative to body weight and scanner manufacturer still lags behind the diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) that are set on an international scale. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the current status of adult DRLs in head, chest and abdominopelvic CT over time on a global scale. A search was carried out in early 2019 using the Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and manual databases. The reference lists of published articles were also assessed to identify further articles. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology was employed to evaluate articles for relevance. Articles were included if they assessed the DRL in head, chest and abdominopelvic scans. The search resulted in 6079 articles, of which 67 were included after a thorough screening process. The literature demonstrates a wide dose variation in reported head, chest and abdominopelvic dose length product (DLP) DRL, ranging from 700-1359, 330-707 and 550-1486 mGy·cm, respectively. Where reported, the volumed CT dose index (CTDI_vol) DRL in the head, chest and abdominopelvic studies ranged from 30.4-85.5, 9-15 and 12.3-31 mGy·cm, respectively. The global means were shown to be slightly lower and significantly lower than the reported values of DLP and CTDI_vol values for the American College of Radiology and European Commission, respectively. This review emphasises the need for an international standardisation for head and body DRL establishment methods, to provide a more comparable global measurement of dose variations across CT sites as well as regular monitoring of delivered radiation dose to patients.

Local clinical diagnostic reference levels for chest and abdomen CT examinations in adults as a function of body mass index and clinical indication: a prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

To compare institutional dose levels based on clinical indication and BMI class to anatomy-based national DRLs (NDRLs) in chest and abdomen CT examinations and to assess local clinical diagnostic reference levels (LCDRLs).

METHODS

From February 2017 to June 2018, after protocol optimization according to clinical indication and body mass index (BMI) class (< 25; ≥ 25), 5310 abdomen and 1058 chest CT series were collected from 5 CT scanners in a Swiss multicenter group. Clinical indication-based institutional dose levels were compared to the Swiss anatomy-based NDRLs. Statistical significance was assessed (p < 0.05). LCDRLs were calculated as the third quartile of the median dose values for each CT scanner.

RESULTS

For chest examinations, dose metrics based on clinical indication were always below P75 NDRL for CTDI_vol (range 3.9-6.4 vs. 7.0 mGy) and DLP (164.0-211.2 vs. 250 mGycm) in all BMI classes except for DLP in BMI ≥ 25 (248.8-255.4 vs. 250.0 mGycm). For abdomen examinations, they were significantly lower or not different than P50 NDRLs for all BMI classes (3.8-9.0 vs. 10.0 mGy and 192.9-446.8 vs. 470mGycm). The estimated LCDRLs show a drop in CTDI_vol (21% for chest and 32% for abdomen, on average) with respect to current DRLs. When considering BMI stratification, the largest LCDRL difference within the same clinical indication is for renal tumor (4.6 mGy for BMI < 25 vs. 10.0 mGy for BMI ≥ 25; - 117%).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest the necessity of estimating clinical indication-based DRLs, especially for abdomen examinations. Stratifying per BMI class allows further optimization of the CT doses.

KEY POINTS

• Our data show that clinical indication-based DRLs might be more appropriate than anatomy-based DRLs and might help in reducing large variations in dose levels for the same type of examinations. • Stratifying the data per patient-size subgroups (non-overweight, overweight) allows a better optimization of CT doses and therefore the possibility to set LCDRLs based on BMI class. • Institutions who are fostering continuous dose optimization and LDRLs should consider defining protocols based on clinical indication and BMI group, to achieve ALARA.

Diagnostic Reference Levels for Adult Nuclear Medicine Imaging Established from the National Survey in Korea

PURPOSE

There is substantial need for optimizing radiation protection in nuclear medicine imaging studies. However, the diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) have not yet been established for nuclear medicine imaging studies in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of administered activity in 32 nuclear medicine imaging studies were collected from the Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine (KSNM) dose survey database from 2013 and 2014. Through the expert discussions and statistical analyses, the 75th quartile value (Q3) was suggested as the preliminary DRL values. Preliminary DRLs were subjected to approval process by the KSNM Board of Directors and KSNM Council, followed by clinical applications and performance rating by domestic institutes.

RESULTS

DRLs were determined through 32 nuclear medicine imaging studies. The Q3 value was considered as appropriate selection as it was generally consistent with the most commonly administered activity. In the present study, the final version of initial DRL values for nuclear medicine imaging in Korean adults is described including various protocols of the brain and myocardial perfusion imaging.

CONCLUSION

The first DRLs for nuclear medicine imaging in Korean adults were confirmed. The DRLs will enable optimized radiation protection in the field of nuclear medicine imaging in Korea.

Computed Tomography Scans in Patients With Young Adult Hip Pain Carry a Lifetime Risk of Malignancy

PURPOSE

To calculate the lifetime risk of malignancy in young adult patients with hip pain using 5 different imaging and radiation dose protocols with or without pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Radiographic and CT patient radiation doses were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging protocols for hip pain composed of radiographs with or without pre- and postoperative CT scans were modeled and radiation doses were estimated using the PCXMC computer code. Based on these radiation doses, lifetime attributable risks of cancer and mortality for a 10- through 60-year-old male and female were calculated as published by the committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) in the BEIR VII report. Relative risks and number needed to harm (NNH) were calculated for each protocol.

RESULTS

Based on a review of our institutional database, 2 CT scan doses were used for this study: a high 5.06 mSv and a low 2.86 mSv. Effective doses of radiation ranged from 0.59 to 0.66 mSv for radiographs alone to 10.71 to 10.78 mSv for radiographs and CT both pre- and postoperatively at the higher dose. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer for radiographs alone was 0.006% and 0.011% for a 20-year-old male and female, respectively. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer for radiographs along with pre- and postoperative CT scans at higher dose was 0.105% and 0.177% for a 20-year-old male and female, respectively. Radiographs alone lead to an NNH of 16,667 for males and 9,090 for females, whereas the protocol with pre- and postoperative CT scans at the higher dose led to an NNH of 952 for males and 564 for females. The relative risk of this protocol compared to radiographs alone was 17.5 for males and 16.1 for females.

CONCLUSION

Protocols with CT scans of the hip/pelvis pose a small lifetime attributable risk (0.034%-0.177% for a 20-year-old) but a large relative risk (5-17 times) of cancer compared with radiographs alone in the imaging evaluation for hip pain that decreases with increasing age.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study illustrates the need for clinicians to understand the imaging protocols used at their institution to understand the risks and benefits of using those protocols in their practice.

RADIATION DOSE FOR PEDIATRIC AND YOUNG ADULT CT: A SURVEY TO ESTABLISH AGE-BASED REFERENCE LEVELS OF 2015-2016 IN KOREA

To assess the doses delivered to pediatric patients during computed tomography (CT) examinations of the brain, chest, high-resolution lung and abdomen, and to establish diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for various age groups in Korea. Dose survey was done to the 19 hospitals performing CT on children, addressing the scan parameters, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP). Per five age group (0, 1, 2-5, 6-10, 11-17 y of age), the proposed DRLs for brain, chest, high-resolution lung and abdomen CT are, respectively, in terms of CTDIvol: 18, 23, 26, 31, 36 mGy; 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 mGy; 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 mGy; 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 mGy; and in terms of DLP: 260, 350, 420, 500, 620 mGy•cm; 50, 80, 100, 170, 340 mGy•cm; 30, 40, 60, 90, 280 mGy•cm; 70, 80, 200, 300, 500 mGy•cm. Compared with published DRLs our suggestion for pediatric CT dose is the lower end. However, an optimization process should be initiated to reduce the spread in patient dose among hospitals despite same CT protocols shown in the study. A major element of this process should be the establishment of institution performance standard and the use of built DRLs.

Quantification of radiation dose reduction by reducing z-axis coverage in 320-detector coronary CT angiography

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the radiation dose reduction achievable by minimizing z-axis coverage in 320-detector coronary CT angiography (CCTA).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 130 CCTAs performed on 320-detector CT that offers up to 16 cm z-axis coverage (adjustable in 2-cm increments), allowing complete coverage of the heart in a single gantry rotation. For each CT, we obtained the radiation dose [CT dose index and dose-length product (DLP)], measured the z-axis field of view and measured the craniocaudal cardiac size (distance from the left main coronary artery to the cardiac apex). We calculated the radiation dose savings achievable by reducing the z-axis coverage to the minimum necessary to cover the heart using 320 × 0.5-mm (maximum 16 cm) and 256 × 0.5-mm (maximum 12.8 cm) detector collimations.

RESULTS

Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The mean craniocaudal cardiac size was 10.5 ± 1.0 cm, with 85% (n = 112) of CCTAs performed with 16 cm of z-axis coverage. The mean DLP was 417.6 ± 182.4 mGy cm, with the mean DLP saving achievable using the minimum z-axis coverage required to completely image the heart being 96.2 ± 47.4 mGy cm, an average dose reduction of 26.9 ± 7.0%. z-axis coverage of ≤12 cm was adequate for 92% and 12.8 cm for 98% of subjects.

CONCLUSION

Using the minimal z-axis coverage to adequately image the heart is a simple step that can reduce the DLP in 320-detector CCTA by approximately 27%. z-axis coverage of ≤12 cm is adequate for 92%, 12.8 cm for 98% and 14 cm for 100% of patients undergoing CCTA. Advances in knowledge: Reducing z-axis coverage in 320-detector CCTA can reduce DLP by approximately 27%.

Diagnostic Reference Levels and Monitoring Practice Can Help Reduce Patient Dose From CT Examinations

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to establish provincial diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and to determine whether this process may help reduce the patient radiation dose from the most frequently performed CT examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated the following CT examinations: head, chest, low-dose chest, abdomen and pelvis, and chest, abdomen, and pelvis examinations. The sample for each protocol included 15 patients of average body weight (mean [± SD], 70 ± 20 kg). The differences in dose between scanners were evaluated using one-way ANOVA. Correlations between dose, scanner age, and the number of detector rows were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. A sample of abdominal and chest examinations were randomized and blinded for review by experienced radiologists who graded diagnostic image quality. Provincial DRLs were calculated as the 75th percentile of patient dose distributions. For hospitals with doses exceeding the DRLs, dose reduction was recommended, followed by another survey.

RESULTS

The initial survey included data of 1185 patients, and an additional 180 patients were surveyed after protocol optimization. The differences between the mean values of the dose distributions from each scanner were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for all examinations. The variation was greatest for low-dose chest CT, with a greater than fivefold difference in the mean dose values noted between scanners. A very weak correlation was found between dose and scanner age or the number of detector rows. Analysis of image quality revealed no statistically significant differences in any scoring categories, with the exception of the noise category in abdominal imaging. Implementation of the DRLs allowed a reduction in patient dose of up to 41% as a result of a protocol change.

CONCLUSION

Establishing provincial DRLs allows an effective reduction in patient dose without resulting in degradation of image quality.

Effective radiation doses of CT examinations in Japan: a nationwide questionnaire-based study

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to estimate the effective radiation doses from CT examinations of both adults and children in Japan and to study the impact of various scan parameters on the effective doses.

METHODS

A questionnaire, which contained detailed questions on the CT scan parameters employed, was distributed to 3000 facilities throughout Japan. For each scanner protocol, the effective doses for head (non-helical and helical), chest and upper abdomen acquisitions were estimated using ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator software v. 1.0.4 (St George's Hospital, London, UK).

RESULTS

The mean effective doses for chest and abdominal examinations using 80-110 kV were significantly lower than those using 120 kV. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean effective doses for head scans between facilities employing 80-110 kV and 120 kV. In chest and abdominal examinations, the mean effective doses using CT scanners from Western manufacturers [Siemens (Forchheim, Germany), Philips (Eindhoven, Netherlands) and GE Medical Systems (Milwaukee, WI)] were significantly lower than those of examinations using Japanese scanners [Hitachi (Kashiwa, Japan) and Toshiba (Otawara, Tochigi, Japan)], except for in paediatric chest examinations.

CONCLUSION

The mean effective doses for adult head, chest and abdominal CT examinations were 2.9, 7.7 and 10.0 mSv, respectively, whereas the corresponding mean effective doses for paediatric examinations were 2.6, 7.1 and 7.7 mSv, respectively.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Facilities using CT scanners by Western manufacturers commonly adopt low-tube-voltage techniques, and low-tube-voltage CT may be useful for reducing the radiation doses to the patients, particularly for the body region.

Survey of volume CT dose index in Japan in 2014

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study are to propose a new set of Japanese diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for 2014 and to study the impact of tube voltage and the type of reconstruction algorithm on patient doses. The volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) for adult and paediatric patients is assessed and compared with the results of a 2011 national survey and data from other countries.

METHODS

Scanning procedures for the head (non-helical and helical), chest and upper abdomen were examined for adults and 5-year-old children. A questionnaire concerning the following items was sent to 3000 facilities: tube voltage, use of reconstruction algorithms and displayed CTDI(vol).

RESULTS

The mean CTDI(vol) values for paediatric examinations using voltages ranging from 80 to 100 kV were significantly lower than those for paediatric examinations using 120 kV. For adult examinations, the use of iterative reconstruction algorithms significantly reduced the mean CTDI(vol) values compared with the use of filtered back projection. Paediatric chest and abdominal scans showed slightly higher mean CTDI(vol) values in 2014 than in 2011. The proposed DRLs for adult head and abdominal scans were higher than those reported in other countries.

CONCLUSION

The results imply that further optimization of CT examination protocols is required for adult head and abdominal scans as well as paediatric chest and abdominal scans.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Low-tube-voltage CT may be useful for reducing radiation doses in paediatric patients. The mean CTDI(vol) values for paediatric scans showed little difference that could be attributed to the choice of reconstruction algorithm.