The role of sham continuous positive airway pressure as a placebo in controlled trials: Best Apnea Interventions for Research Trial

Strategies to Assess the Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Long-Term Clinically Important Outcomes among Patients with Symptomatic Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although CPAP improves symptoms (e.g., daytime sleepiness), there is a lack of high-quality evidence that CPAP prevents many long-term outcomes, including cognitive impairment, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Observational studies suggest that patients with symptoms may be particularly likely to experience these preventive benefits with CPAP, but ethical and practical concerns limited the participation of such patients in prior long-term randomized trials. As a result, there is uncertainty about the full benefits of CPAP, and resolving this uncertainty is a key priority for the field. This workshop assembled clinicians, researchers, ethicists, and patients to identify strategies to understand the causal effects of CPAP on long-term clinically important outcomes among patients with symptomatic OSA. Quasi-experimental designs can provide valuable information and are less time and resource intensive than trials. Under specific conditions and assumptions, quasi-experimental studies may be able to provide causal estimates of CPAP's effectiveness from generalizable observational cohorts. However, randomized trials represent the most reliable approach to understanding the causal effects of CPAP among patients with symptoms. Randomized trials of CPAP can ethically include patients with symptomatic OSA, as long as there is outcome-specific equipoise, adequate informed consent, and a plan to maximize safety while minimizing harm (e.g., monitoring for pathologic sleepiness). Furthermore, multiple strategies exist to ensure the generalizability and practicality of future randomized trials of CPAP. These strategies include reducing the burden of trial procedures, improving patient-centeredness, and engaging historically excluded and underserved populations.

The placebo effect in pharmacological treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

New drug treatments are under development in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The placebo effect is well recognized in various conditions, but its relevance in OSA is debated. In the current study we determined the influence of a placebo effect in studies of drug therapy in OSA.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42021229410) with searches in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to 2021-01-19. Inclusion criteria were (i) RCTs of adults with OSA, (ii) drug intervention with placebo baseline and follow-up sleep study (iii) outcomes: apnea hypopnea index (AHI), mean oxygen saturation (mSaO2), oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and/or Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Risk-of-bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.

RESULTS

7436 articles were identified and 29 studies included (n = 413). Studies were generally small (median n = 14), with 78% men, baseline AHI range 9-74 events/h and treatment duration range 1-120 days. Meta-analyses were conducted for main outcomes. Mean change of the primary outcome, AHI, was -0.84 (95% CI -2.98 to 1.30); mSaO2 and ODI estimations were also non-significant. ESS showed a trend towards a reduction of -1 unit. Subgroup analysis did not show significant differences. Risk-of-bias assessment indicated mostly low risk but studies were small with wide confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis we did not identify systematic placebo effects on the AHI, ODI or mSaO2 while ESS score showed a trend for a small reduction. These results have an impact on the design and interpretation of drug trials in OSA.

Pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic approaches in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a common breathing disorder in sleep in which the airways narrow or collapse during sleep, causing obstructive sleep apnea. The prevalence of OSAS continues to rise worldwide, particularly in middle-aged and elderly individuals. The mechanism of upper airway collapse is incompletely understood but is associated with several factors, including obesity, craniofacial changes, altered muscle function in the upper airway, pharyngeal neuropathy, and fluid shifts to the neck. The main characteristics of OSAS are recurrent pauses in respiration, which lead to intermittent hypoxia (IH) and hypercapnia, accompanied by blood oxygen desaturation and arousal during sleep, which sharply increases the risk of several diseases. This paper first briefly describes the epidemiology, incidence, and pathophysiological mechanisms of OSAS. Next, the alterations in relevant signaling pathways induced by IH are systematically reviewed and discussed. For example, IH can induce gut microbiota (GM) dysbiosis, impair the intestinal barrier, and alter intestinal metabolites. These mechanisms ultimately lead to secondary oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, and sympathetic activation. We then summarize the effects of IH on disease pathogenesis, including cardiocerebrovascular disorders, neurological disorders, metabolic diseases, cancer, reproductive disorders, and COVID-19. Finally, different therapeutic strategies for OSAS caused by different causes are proposed. Multidisciplinary approaches and shared decision-making are necessary for the successful treatment of OSAS in the future, but more randomized controlled trials are needed for further evaluation to define what treatments are best for specific OSAS patients.

Changes in Functional Connectivity of Hippocampal Subregions in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea after Six Months of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment

Previous studies have shown that the structural and functional impairments of hippocampal subregions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are related to cognitive impairment. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment can improve the clinical symptoms of OSA. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate functional connectivity (FC) changes in hippocampal subregions of patients with OSA after six months of CPAP treatment (post-CPAP) and its relationship with neurocognitive function. We collected and analyzed baseline (pre-CPAP) and post-CPAP data from 20 patients with OSA, including sleep monitoring, clinical evaluation, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. The results showed that compared with pre-CPAP OSA patients, the FC between the right anterior hippocampal gyrus and multiple brain regions, and between the left anterior hippocampal gyrus and posterior central gyrus were reduced in post-CPAP OSA patients. By contrast, the FC between the left middle hippocampus and the left precentral gyrus was increased. The changes in FC in these brain regions were closely related to cognitive dysfunction. Therefore, our findings suggest that CPAP treatment can effectively change the FC patterns of hippocampal subregions in patients with OSA, facilitating a better understanding of the neural mechanisms of cognitive function improvement, and emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and timely treatment of OSA.

Placebo response in objective and subjective measures of hypersomnia in randomized clinical trials on obstructive sleep apnea. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sleepiness is one of the outcomes most used in randomized clinical trials (RCT) on the effect of treatments for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Furthermore, it is known that there is a placebo effect, especially in subjective measures. Therefore, given that sleepiness is a subjective measure, the objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis and three-level meta-regression was to assess the response to different placebos (pills and sham-CPAP) used in RCTs in OSA, both on subjective (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) and objective (Multiple Sleep Latency Test [MSLT], Maintenance Wake Test [MWT], the Osler test and the Psychomotor Vigilance Task [PVT]). We observed a statistically significant placebo effect in both subjective and objective measures of hypersomnia, and in both sham-CPAP and pills. This placebo effect was greater, even clinically significant, in subjective measures (ESS: -2.84 points) and in those RCTs that used pills as a placebo. In the meta-regression, only a higher baseline value of the ESS and Osler test was related to the placebo effect.

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on ambulatory blood pressures in high-risk sleep apnea patients: a randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The long-term effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on 24-hour blood pressure (BP) in high-risk patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is uncertain. We aimed to determine the effect of CPAP treatment on ambulatory BP in individuals with moderate or severe OSA and cardiovascular disease (CVD) or multiple CVD risk factors without severe sleepiness.

METHODS

In this randomized, controlled, parallel group study, 169 participants were randomly assigned to CPAP treatment or the control group. The primary outcome was the change in mean 24-hour systolic BP between groups from baseline to the average of 6 and 12 month measurements using mixed effect linear regression models.

RESULTS

The 24-hour systolic BP did not significantly differ by group, although there was a trend of decrease in the CPAP group (treatment effect -2.7 mm Hg [95% confidence interval -5.9 to 0.6]; P=0.105) compared with control. CPAP had the greatest effect on nighttime systolic BP (treatment effect -5.9 mm Hg [95% confidence interval -9.9 to -1.9]; P=0.004). Similar improvements in other nocturnal BP indices were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In high risk patients with moderate-severe OSA without severe sleepiness, CPAP resulted in modest BP improvements over 6 to 12 months of follow-up, with possibly larger effects for nocturnal BP. Use of office blood pressure may under-estimate the effect of CPAP on BP profile in patients with OSA.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Title: Sleep Apnea Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Reduction; Identifier: NCT01261390; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01261390.

Telemedicine interventions for CPAP adherence in obstructive sleep apnea patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the preferred therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, data suggests treatment adherence is low. In recent years, telemedicine-based intervention (TM) has been evaluated to increase adherence. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we evaluated the efficacy of TM on CPAP adherence in patients with OSA. Two independent reviewers explored five databases; the risk of bias (RoB) was evaluated using the Cochrane tool. Outcomes were defined as the mean difference (MD) in CPAP use per night and the proportion of patients with increased CPAP adherence of ≥4 h/night. The meta-analysis was conducted following the DerSimonian-Laird method, and the certainty of the evidence was rated according to GRADE. We included 16 RCTs including 3039 participants. The RoB was low in 12/16 studies. TM was associated with an increase in CPAP adherence of 29.2 min/night, I² =75% (p < 0.01), and CPAP adherence ≧4 h/night, RR: 1.09 (1.02-1.17), I² =22%. Subgroup analyses reported better results between three and 6 months, in the sleepy subgroup. Finally, based on the results obtained in this systematic review, there is favorable evidence regarding the treatment with TM in patients with OSA using CPAP. REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020165367.

Sleep Apnea and Fetal Growth Restriction (SAFER) study: protocol for a pragmatic randomised clinical trial of positive airway pressure as an antenatal therapy for fetal growth restriction in maternal obstructive sleep apnoea

INTRODUCTION

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major contributor to fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality with intrauterine, neonatal and lifelong complications. This study explores maternal obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) as a potentially modifiable risk factor for FGR. We hypothesise that, in pregnancies complicated by FGR, treating mothers who have OSA using positive airway pressure (PAP) will improve birth weight and neonatal outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Sleep Apnea and Fetal Growth Restriction study is a prospective, block-randomised, single-blinded, multicentre, pragmatic controlled trial. We enrol pregnant women aged 18-50, between 22 and 31 weeks of gestation, with established FGR based on second trimester ultrasound, who do not have other prespecified known causes of FGR (such as congenital anomalies or intrauterine infection). In stage 1, participants are screened by questionnaire for OSA risk. If OSA risk is identified, participants proceed to stage 2, where they undergo home sleep apnoea testing. Participants are determined to have OSA if they have an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥5 (if the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) is also ≥5) or if they have an AHI ≥10 (even if the ODI is <5). These participants proceed to stage 3, where they are randomised to nightly treatment with PAP or no PAP (standard care control), which is maintained until delivery. The primary outcome is unadjusted birth weight; secondary outcomes include fetal growth velocity on ultrasound, enrolment-to-delivery interval, gestational age at delivery, birth weight corrected for gestational age, stillbirth, Apgar score, rate of admission to higher levels of care (neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery) and length of neonatal stay. These outcomes are compared between PAP and control using intention-to-treat analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri; Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem; and the University of Rochester, New York. Recruitment began in Washington University in November 2019 but stopped from March to November 2020 due to COVID-19. Recruitment began in Hadassah Hebrew University in March 2021, and in the University of Rochester in May 2021. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences and scientific publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04084990.

Continuous positive airway pressure improves blood pressure and serum cardiovascular biomarkers in obstructive sleep apnoea and hypertension

RATIONALE

The impact of treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) on reduction of cardiovascular risk is unclear. This study aimed to examine the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and subclinical myocardial injury in subjects with OSA and hypertension.

METHODS

Subjects with hypertension requiring at least three anti-hypertensive medications and moderate-severe OSA were enrolled. Eligible subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive either CPAP treatment or control (no CPAP) for eight weeks. Changes in ambulatory BP and serum biomarkers were compared. Stratified analysis according to circadian BP pattern was performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Ninety two subjects (75% men; age, 51±8 years; apnoea-hypopnoea index 40±8 events·h^-1, taking average of 3.4 anti-hypertensive drugs [range 3-6]) were randomised. The group on CPAP treatment, compared to the control group, demonstrated significant reduction in 24-h systolic BP (-4.4 mmHg, 95% CI -8.7 to -0.1, p=0.046), 24-h diastolic BP (-2.9 mmHg, 95% CI -5.5 to -0.2, p=0.032), daytime systolic BP (-5.4 mmHg, -9.7 to -1.0, p=0.016) and daytime diastolic BP (-3.4 mmHg, 95% CI -6.1 to -0.8, p=0.012). CPAP treatment was associated with significant BP lowering only in non-dippers, but not in dippers. Serum troponin I (mean difference -1.74 pg·mL^-1, 95% CI -2.97 to -0.5, p=0.006) and brain natriuretic peptide (-9.1 pg·mL^-1, 95% CI -17.6 to -0.6, p=0.036) were significantly reduced in CPAP compared to control group.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort with OSA and multiple cardiovascular risk factors including difficult-to-control hypertension, short-term CPAP treatment improved ambulatory BP and alleviated subclinical myocardial injury and strain.

Where to Next for Optimizing Adherence in Large-Scale Trials of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure?

Large-scale randomized trials of positive airway pressure (PAP) efficacy have been largely negative but PAP adherence was notably suboptimal across the trials. To address this limitation, evidence-based PAP adherence protocols embedded within the larger trial protocol are recommended. The complexity of such protocols depends on adequacy of resources, including funding and inclusion of behavioral scientist experts on the scientific team, and trial-specific considerations (eg, target population) and methods. Recommendations for optimizing PAP adherence in large-scale trials are set forth that address rigor and reproducibility.

Propensity score weighting for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials

Chance imbalance in baseline characteristics is common in randomized clinical trials. Regression adjustment such as the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is often used to account for imbalance and increase precision of the treatment effect estimate. An objective alternative is through inverse probability weighting (IPW) of the propensity scores. Although IPW and ANCOVA are asymptotically equivalent, the former may demonstrate inferior performance in finite samples. In this article, we point out that IPW is a special case of the general class of balancing weights, and advocate to use overlap weighting (OW) for covariate adjustment. The OW method has a unique advantage of completely removing chance imbalance when the propensity score is estimated by logistic regression. We show that the OW estimator attains the same semiparametric variance lower bound as the most efficient ANCOVA estimator and the IPW estimator for a continuous outcome, and derive closed-form variance estimators for OW when estimating additive and ratio estimands. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate OW consistently outperforms IPW in finite samples and improves the efficiency over ANCOVA and augmented IPW when the degree of treatment effect heterogeneity is moderate or when the outcome model is incorrectly specified. We apply the proposed OW estimator to the Best Apnea Interventions for Research (BestAIR) randomized trial to evaluate the effect of continuous positive airway pressure on patient health outcomes. All the discussed propensity score weighting methods are implemented in the R package PSweight.

A Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study of CPAP for Patients with Chronic Cough and Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

An association between chronic cough and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been reported in prior studies with resolution or improvement in cough after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Controlled studies of the benefit of CPAP on cough-quality of life measures have not been conducted.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does CPAP therapy for OSA improve cough in patients with chronic unexplained cough?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with unexplained chronic cough (> 2 months duration of cough) and OSA were randomized to receive either CPAP or sham CPAP therapy for 6 weeks. The primary end point was the change in health status assessed with the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) in patients treated with CPAP vs. sham CPAP. Secondary end points were changes in exhaled breath condensate markers of airway inflammation (interleukin-6, nitrite/nitrates, hydrogen peroxide and 8-isoprostanes).

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients with chronic unexplained cough and OSA were randomized of whom18 completed 6 weeks of treatments with either CPAP or sham CPAP. The CPAP vs. sham CPAP-treated group were comparable in terms of sex distribution, body mass index, and OSA severity. Following CPAP therapy, there was a significantly greater improvement in total LCQ scores as compared to those treated with sham therapy (ANCOVA p value 0.016). No significant differences were noted in the exhaled breath condensate marker changes between CPAP-treated vs. sham CPAP-treated groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of comorbid OSA in patients with chronic cough improved cough quality of life measures following treatment of OSA with CPAP in this pilot study. Larger studies to understand this association and unravel mechanisms of CPAP benefit in chronic cough need to be undertaken. Clinical Trial Registration NCT03172130.