1
|
Chertov O, Frolov P, Shanin V, Priputina I, Bykhovets S, Geraskina A. A Model of the Ectomycorrhizal Contribution to Forest Soil C and N Dynamics and Tree N Supply Within the EFIMOD3 Model System. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2025; 14:417. [PMID: 39942979 PMCID: PMC11820865 DOI: 10.3390/plants14030417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2024] [Revised: 01/21/2025] [Accepted: 01/28/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025]
Abstract
Mycorrhizal symbiosis has been the focus of research for more than a century due to the positive effect of fungi on the growth of the majority of woody plants. The extramatrical mycelium (EMM) of ectomycorrhiza (EMR) accounts for up to one-third of the total soil microbial biomass, whereas litter from this short-living pool accounts for 60% of the total litterfall mass in forest ecosystems. The functioning of EMR improves the nitrogen (N) nutrition of trees and thus contributes to the carbon (C) balance of forest soils. The model presented here is an attempt to describe these EMR functions quantitatively. It calculates the growth of EMM and the subsequent "mining" of additional nitrogen from recalcitrant soil organic matter (SOM) for EMR growth, with the associated formation of "dissolved soil carbon". The decomposition of EMM litter is carried out by all organisms in the soil food webs, forming available NH4+ in the first phase and then solid-phase by-products (excretes) as a new labile SOM pool. These substances are the feedback that determines the positive role of EMR symbiosis for forest vegetation. A sensitivity analysis revealed a leading role of the C:N ratio of biotic components in the dynamics of EMM. The model validation showed a satisfactory agreement between simulated and observed data in relation to EMM respiration in larch forest plantations of different ages. Model testing within the EFIMOD3 model system allowed a quantitative assessment of the contribution of different components to forest soil and ecosystem respiration. The validation and testing of this model demonstrated the adequacy of the theoretical background used in this model, with a fast EMM decomposition cycle by all soil biota of the food webs and without direct resource exchange between plants and fungi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Chertov
- Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya st., 84/32, bld. 14, 117997 Moscow, Russia; (V.S.); (A.G.)
| | - Pavel Frolov
- Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya st., 2, 142290 Pushchino, Russia; (P.F.); (I.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Vladimir Shanin
- Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya st., 84/32, bld. 14, 117997 Moscow, Russia; (V.S.); (A.G.)
- Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya st., 2, 142290 Pushchino, Russia; (P.F.); (I.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Irina Priputina
- Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya st., 2, 142290 Pushchino, Russia; (P.F.); (I.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Sergey Bykhovets
- Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya st., 2, 142290 Pushchino, Russia; (P.F.); (I.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Anna Geraskina
- Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya st., 84/32, bld. 14, 117997 Moscow, Russia; (V.S.); (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marshall JD, Tarvainen L, Zhao P, Lim H, Wallin G, Näsholm T, Lundmark T, Linder S, Peichl M. Components explain, but do eddy fluxes constrain? Carbon budget of a nitrogen-fertilized boreal Scots pine forest. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2023; 239:2166-2179. [PMID: 37148187 DOI: 10.1111/nph.18939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Nitrogen (N) fertilization increases biomass and soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation in boreal pine forests, but the underlying mechanisms remain uncertain. At two Scots pine sites, one undergoing annual N fertilization and the other a reference, we sought to explain these responses. We measured component fluxes, including biomass production, SOC accumulation, and respiration, and summed them into carbon budgets. We compared the resulting summations to ecosystem fluxes measured by eddy covariance. N fertilization increased most component fluxes (P < 0.05), especially SOC accumulation (20×). Only fine-root, mycorrhiza, and exudate production decreased, by 237 (SD = 28) g C m-2 yr-1 . Stemwood production increases were ascribed to this partitioning shift, gross primary production (GPP), and carbon-use efficiency, in that order. The methods agreed in their estimates of GPP in both stands (P > 0.05), but the components detected an increase in net ecosystem production (NEP) (190 (54) g C m-2 yr-1 ; P < 0.01) that eddy covariance did not (19 (62) g C m-2 yr-1 ; ns). The pairing of plots, the simplicity of the sites, and the strength of response provide a compelling description of N effects on the C budget. However, the disagreement between methods calls for further paired tests of N fertilization effects in simple forest ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Marshall
- Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, SE-901 83, Sweden
- Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung, Isotopen-Biogeochemie and Gasflüsse, Müncheberg, 15374, Germany
| | - Lasse Tarvainen
- Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, SE-901 83, Sweden
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Sweden
| | - Peng Zhao
- Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, SE-901 83, Sweden
| | - Hyungwoo Lim
- Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, SE-901 83, Sweden
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Juhan Liivi 2, Tartu, 50409, Estonia
| | - Göran Wallin
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Sweden
- Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK
| | - Torgny Näsholm
- Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, SE-901 83, Sweden
| | - Tomas Lundmark
- Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, SE-901 83, Sweden
| | - Sune Linder
- Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU, PO Box 190, Lomma, SE-234 22, Sweden
| | - Matthias Peichl
- Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, SE-901 83, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang Y, Wang F, Zhang L, Zhao J, Zheng H, Zhang F, Wang N, Gu J, Zhao Y, Zhang W. Changes and net ecosystem productivity of terrestrial ecosystems and their influencing factors in China from 2000 to 2019. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2023; 14:1120064. [PMID: 37008462 PMCID: PMC10050708 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1120064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Changes in net ecosystem productivity (NEP) in terrestrial ecosystems in response to climate warming and land cover changes have been of great concern. In this study, we applied the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), average temperature, and sunshine hours to drive the C-FIX model and to simulate the regional NEP in China from 2000 to 2019. We also analyzed the spatial patterns and the spatiotemporal variation characteristics of the NEP of terrestrial ecosystems and discussed their main influencing factors. The results showed that (1) the annual average NEP of terrestrial ecosystems in China from 2000 to 2019 was 1.08 PgC, exhibiting a highly significant increasing trend with a rate of change of 0.83 PgC/10 y. The terrestrial ecosystems in China remained as carbon sinks from 2000 to 2019, and the carbon sink capacity increased significantly. The NEP of the terrestrial ecosystem increased by 65% during 2015-2019 compared to 2000-2004 (2) There was spatial differences in the NEP distribution of the terrestrial ecosystems in China from 2000-2019. Taking the line along the Daxinganling-Yin Mountains-Helan Mountains-Transverse Range as the boundary, the NEP was significantly higher in the eastern part than in the western part. Among them, the NEP was positive (carbon sink) in northeastern, central, and southern China, and negative (carbon source) in parts of northwestern China and the Tibet Autonomous Region. The spatial variation of NEP in terrestrial ecosystems increased from 2000 to 2009. The areas with a significant increase accounted for 45.85% and were mainly located in the central and southwestern regions. (3) The simulation results revealed that vegetation changes and CO2 concentration changes both contributed to the increase in the NEP in China, contributing 85.96% and 36.84%, respectively. The vegetation changes were the main factor causing the increase in the NEP. The main contribution of this study is to further quantify the NEP of terrestrial ecosystems in China and identify the influencing factors that caused these changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutao Huang
- Heilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Geographical Environment Monitoring and Spatial Information Service in Cold Regions, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China
| | - Fang Wang
- Heilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Geographical Environment Monitoring and Spatial Information Service in Cold Regions, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China
| | - Lijuan Zhang
- Heilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Geographical Environment Monitoring and Spatial Information Service in Cold Regions, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China
| | - Junfang Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Zheng
- Laboratory of Climate Application, Climate Center of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, China
| | - Fan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China
| | - Nan Wang
- Heilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Geographical Environment Monitoring and Spatial Information Service in Cold Regions, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China
| | - Jiakai Gu
- Heilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Geographical Environment Monitoring and Spatial Information Service in Cold Regions, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China
| | - Yufeng Zhao
- Heilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Geographical Environment Monitoring and Spatial Information Service in Cold Regions, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China
| | - Wenshuai Zhang
- Heilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Geographical Environment Monitoring and Spatial Information Service in Cold Regions, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tagesson T, Tian F, Schurgers G, Horion S, Scholes R, Ahlström A, Ardö J, Moreno A, Madani N, Olin S, Fensholt R. A physiology-based Earth observation model indicates stagnation in the global gross primary production during recent decades. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2021; 27:836-854. [PMID: 33124068 PMCID: PMC7898396 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Earth observation-based estimates of global gross primary production (GPP) are essential for understanding the response of the terrestrial biosphere to climatic change and other anthropogenic forcing. In this study, we attempt an ecosystem-level physiological approach of estimating GPP using an asymptotic light response function (LRF) between GPP and incoming photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) that better represents the response observed at high spatiotemporal resolutions than the conventional light use efficiency approach. Modelled GPP is thereafter constrained with meteorological and hydrological variables. The variability in field-observed GPP, net primary productivity and solar-induced fluorescence was better or equally well captured by our LRF-based GPP when compared with six state-of-the-art Earth observation-based GPP products. Over the period 1982-2015, the LRF-based average annual global terrestrial GPP budget was 121.8 ± 3.5 Pg C, with a detrended inter-annual variability of 0.74 ± 0.13 Pg C. The strongest inter-annual variability was observed in semi-arid regions, but croplands in China and India also showed strong inter-annual variations. The trend in global terrestrial GPP during 1982-2015 was 0.27 ± 0.02 Pg C year-1 , and was generally larger in the northern than the southern hemisphere. Most positive GPP trends were seen in areas with croplands whereas negative trends were observed for large non-cropped parts of the tropics. Trends were strong during the eighties and nineties but levelled off around year 2000. Other GPP products either showed no trends or continuous increase throughout the study period. This study benchmarks a first global Earth observation-based model using an asymptotic light response function, improving simulations of GPP, and reveals a stagnation in the global GPP after the year 2000.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torbern Tagesson
- Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource ManagementUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Feng Tian
- Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden
- School of Remote Sensing and Information EngineeringWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
| | - Guy Schurgers
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource ManagementUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Stephanie Horion
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource ManagementUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Robert Scholes
- Global Change InstituteUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Anders Ahlström
- Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden
- Center for Middle Eastern StudiesLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Jonas Ardö
- Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Alvaro Moreno
- Image Processing Laboratory (IPL)Universitat de ValènciaPaterna, ValènciaSpain
- Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, W.A. Franke College of Forestry & ConservationUniversity of MontanaMissoulaMTUSA
| | | | - Stefan Olin
- Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Rasmus Fensholt
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource ManagementUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xie Y, Lei X, Shi J. Impacts of climate change on biological rotation of Larix olgensis plantations for timber production and carbon storage in northeast China using the 3-PGmix model. Ecol Modell 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
6
|
Collalti A, Ibrom A, Stockmarr A, Cescatti A, Alkama R, Fernández-Martínez M, Matteucci G, Sitch S, Friedlingstein P, Ciais P, Goll DS, Nabel JEMS, Pongratz J, Arneth A, Haverd V, Prentice IC. Forest production efficiency increases with growth temperature. Nat Commun 2020; 11:5322. [PMID: 33087724 PMCID: PMC7578801 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19187-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Forest production efficiency (FPE) metric describes how efficiently the assimilated carbon is partitioned into plants organs (biomass production, BP) or-more generally-for the production of organic matter (net primary production, NPP). We present a global analysis of the relationship of FPE to stand-age and climate, based on a large compilation of data on gross primary production and either BP or NPP. FPE is important for both forest production and atmospheric carbon dioxide uptake. We find that FPE increases with absolute latitude, precipitation and (all else equal) with temperature. Earlier findings-FPE declining with age-are also supported by this analysis. However, the temperature effect is opposite to what would be expected based on the short-term physiological response of respiration rates to temperature, implying a top-down regulation of carbon loss, perhaps reflecting the higher carbon costs of nutrient acquisition in colder climates. Current ecosystem models do not reproduce this phenomenon. They consistently predict lower FPE in warmer climates, and are therefore likely to overestimate carbon losses in a warming climate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Collalti
- National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Agriculture and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean (ISAFOM), 06128, Perugia (PG), Italy
- University of Tuscia, Department of Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| | - A Ibrom
- Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Department of Environmental Engineering, Lyngby, Denmark.
| | - A Stockmarr
- Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - A Cescatti
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Ispra, Italy
| | - R Alkama
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Ispra, Italy
| | - M Fernández-Martínez
- Research group PLECO (Plants and Ecosystems), Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - G Matteucci
- National Research Council of Italy, Institute for BioEconomy (IBE), 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy
| | - S Sitch
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4RJ, UK
| | - P Friedlingstein
- College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK
| | - P Ciais
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et del'Environnement, CEA CNRS UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France
| | - D S Goll
- Department of Geography, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - J E M S Nabel
- Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Pongratz
- Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Luisenstr 37, 80333, Munich, Germany
| | - A Arneth
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research/Atmospheric Environmental Research, 82467, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
| | - V Haverd
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - I C Prentice
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, London, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia
- Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, 100084, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|