1
|
Collum TD, Stone AL, Sherman DJ, Damsteegt VD, Schneider WL, Rogers EE. Viral Reservoir Capacity of Wild Prunus Alternative Hosts of Plum Pox Virus Through Multiple Cycles of Transmission and Dormancy. PLANT DISEASE 2022; 106:101-106. [PMID: 34293916 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-04-21-0802-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Plum pox virus (PPV) is a significant pathogen of Prunus worldwide and is known for having a broad experimental host range. Many of these hosts represent epidemiological risks as potential wild viral reservoirs. A comparative study of the PPV reservoir capacity of three commonly found native North American species, western choke cherry (Prunus virginiana var. demissa), black cherry (Prunus serotina), and American plum (Prunus americana) was conducted. Pennsylvania isolates of PPV-D were transmitted from the original host peach (Prunus persica cv. GF305) to all three species. Viral accumulation and transmission rates to alternative hosts and peach were monitored over the course of five vegetative growth and cold induced dormancy (CID) cycles. The three alternative host species demonstrated differences in their ability to maintain PPV-D and the likelihood of transmission to additional alternative hosts or back transmission to peach. Western choke cherry had low (5.8%) initial infection levels, PPV-D was not transmissible to additional western choke cherry, and transmission of PPV-D from western choke cherry to peach was only possible before the first CID cycle. Black cherry had intermediate initial infection levels (26.6%) but did not maintain high infection levels after repeated CID cycles. Conversely, American plum had a high level (50%) of initial infection that was not significantly different from initial infection in peach (72.2%) and maintained moderate levels (15 to 25%) of infection and PPV-D transmission to both American plum and peach through all five cycles of CID. Our results indicate that American plum has the greatest potential to act as a reservoir host for Pennsylvania isolates of PPV-D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara D Collum
- Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Frederick, MD 21702
| | - Andrew L Stone
- Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Frederick, MD 21702
| | - Diana J Sherman
- Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Frederick, MD 21702
| | - Vernon D Damsteegt
- Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Frederick, MD 21702
| | - William L Schneider
- Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Frederick, MD 21702
| | - Elizabeth E Rogers
- Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Frederick, MD 21702
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gougherty AV, Pazdernik KT, Kaiser MS, Nutter FW. Evaluation of Sampling and Testing Efficiencies of Plum pox virus Eradication Programs in Pennsylvania and Ontario. PLANT DISEASE 2015; 99:1247-1253. [PMID: 30695922 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-07-14-0694-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Plum pox virus (PPV) was first detected in the United States in Pennsylvania in 1999 and in Ontario, Canada in 2000. Following a 10-year survey and eradication program, PPV was officially declared eradicated in Pennsylvania in 2009. Although incidence of PPV was greatly reduced from 2000 to 2008, PPV remains present in Ontario. The objective of this study was to compare how the Pennsylvania and Ontario PPV eradication programs affected the probability of detecting PPV at the leaf, scaffold, tree, and Prunus orchard block scales. A simulation model was developed to evaluate the sampling and testing efficiency of the two programs. At the tree scale, the Pennsylvania sampling and detection protocols had a detection efficiency of 71.8% compared with 40.5% for the Ontario program. Several components in the Pennsylvania and Ontario PPV eradication programs affected PPV detection efficiency. A stratified (by tree scaffold) random sampling design did not improve PPV detection efficiency in either program, compared with a simple random sampling design to select leaves for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing. Detection efficiency for both programs increased with sample size but gains in detection efficiency diminished as sample size increased. There was good agreement (between the commercial ELISA kit used in Pennsylvania and the kit used in Ontario) at the leaf and scaffold scales but not the tree scale. Based on simulation modeling, the Pennsylvania PPV eradication program required that >2 PPV-positive trees must be present within a Prunus block to achieve a 95% probability of correctly detecting PPV at the block scale, whereas the Ontario program required >5 PPV-positive trees within a block to achieve 95% probability of detection. The results from this study have important implications with regard to the efficiency of the two eradication programs to detect PPV-positive trees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - F W Nutter
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gougherty AV, Nutter FW. Impact of Eradication Programs on the Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Plum pox virus on Prunus spp. in Pennsylvania and Ontario, Canada. PLANT DISEASE 2015; 99:593-603. [PMID: 30699685 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-03-14-0224-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The goals of this research were to quantify the impacts of the Pennsylvania and Ontario Plum pox virus (PPV) eradication programs on the spatial and temporal dynamics of PPV epidemics on Prunus spp. The incidence of PPV-positive trees detected over time decreased in both Pennsylvania (-ln 0.85 units per year) and Ontario (-ln 0.51 units per year); however, PPV incidence per year decreased only 60% as fast in Ontario as in Pennsylvania. Marked point pattern analysis revealed that PPV-positive Prunus blocks in Pennsylvania were clustered for distances of 0.7 to 4.3 km, whereas PPV-positive blocks in Ontario were clustered for distances of 1.0 to 25.0 km. Multiyear spatiotemporal analyses revealed that the locations of PPV-positive blocks detected were spatially dependent upon the locations of PPV-positive blocks detected during the previous year. In Pennsylvania, between 2002 and 2006, distances to 95% of newly detected PPV-positive blocks occurred within 10 and 20 km from the previous year's PPV-positive blocks. In Ontario, 95% of new PPV-positive blocks occurred within 500 to 900 m from PPV-positive blocks detected the previous year. Until 2011, the PPV eradication policy for Prunus blocks in Ontario was triggered by a threshold incidence or PPV-positive tests for three consecutive years. Although the Ontario program was highly successful in reducing PPV incidence from 2001 to 2008, PPV was not eradicated. This study provides important quantitative information concerning the impact of PPV eradication programs on the spatial and temporal dynamics of PPV epidemics in Pennsylvania and Ontario. The analyses employed in this study may help to improve the effectiveness of present and future PPV eradication programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A V Gougherty
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
| | - F W Nutter
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mavrodieva V, James D, Williams K, Negi S, Varga A, Mock R, Levy L. Molecular Analysis of a Plum pox virus W Isolate in Plum Germplasm Hand Carried into the USA from the Ukraine Shows a Close Relationship to a Latvian Isolate. PLANT DISEASE 2013; 97:44-52. [PMID: 30722258 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-01-12-0104-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Four of 19 Prunus germplasm accessions hand carried from the Ukraine into the United States without authorization were found to be infected with Plum pox virus (PPV). Of the three isolates characterized, isolates UKR 44189 and UKR 44191 were confirmed to be isolates of PPV strain W, and UKR 44188 was confirmed to be an isolate of PPV strain D. UKR 44189 and UKR 44191 are very closely related to the PPV strain W isolate LV-145bt (HQ670748) from Latvia. Nucleotide and amino acid sequence identities between these three isolates were greater than 99%. This indicates that the isolates are very closely related and likely originated from a common source. The high genetic diversity among PPV-W strain isolates allowed the identification of potential recombination events between PPV isolates. It appears also that GF 305 peach and Prunus tomentosa are not hosts for the PPV isolate UKR 44189.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vessela Mavrodieva
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services (APHIS), Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), Center for Plant Health Science and Technology (CPHST) Beltsville Laboratory, Bldg. 580, BARC-East, Powder Mill Rd., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - Delano James
- Sidney Laboratory, Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), 8801 East Saanich Road, Sidney, BC, V8L 1H3, Canada
| | - Karen Williams
- USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST Beltsville Laboratory, Bldg. 580, BARC-East, Powder Mill Rd., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - Sarika Negi
- USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST Beltsville Laboratory, Bldg. 580, BARC-East, Powder Mill Rd., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - Aniko Varga
- Sidney Laboratory, CFIA, 8801 East Saanich Road, Sidney, BC, V8L 1H3, Canada
| | - Ray Mock
- USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Laurene Levy
- USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST Beltsville Laboratory, Bldg. 580, BARC-East, Powder Mill Rd., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sochor J, Babula P, Adam V, Krska B, Kizek R. Sharka: the past, the present and the future. Viruses 2012; 4:2853-901. [PMID: 23202508 PMCID: PMC3509676 DOI: 10.3390/v4112853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2012] [Revised: 10/25/2012] [Accepted: 10/30/2012] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Members the Potyviridae family belong to a group of plant viruses that are causing devastating plant diseases with a significant impact on agronomy and economics. Plum pox virus (PPV), as a causative agent of sharka disease, is widely discussed. The understanding of the molecular biology of potyviruses including PPV and the function of individual proteins as products of genome expression are quite necessary for the proposal the new antiviral strategies. This review brings to view the members of Potyviridae family with respect to plum pox virus. The genome of potyviruses is discussed with respect to protein products of its expression and their function. Plum pox virus distribution, genome organization, transmission and biochemical changes in infected plants are introduced. In addition, techniques used in PPV detection are accentuated and discussed, especially with respect to new modern techniques of nucleic acids isolation, based on the nanotechnological approach. Finally, perspectives on the future of possibilities for nanotechnology application in PPV determination/identification are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiri Sochor
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; (J.S.); (P.B.); (V.A.); (R.K.)
- Department of Natural Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Palackeho 1-3, CZ-612 42, Czech Republic
- Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Babula
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; (J.S.); (P.B.); (V.A.); (R.K.)
- Department of Natural Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Palackeho 1-3, CZ-612 42, Czech Republic
- Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vojtech Adam
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; (J.S.); (P.B.); (V.A.); (R.K.)
- Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Boris Krska
- Department of Fruit Growing, Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Valticka 337, CZ-691 44 Lednice, Czech Republic;
| | - Rene Kizek
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; (J.S.); (P.B.); (V.A.); (R.K.)
- Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|